Method and system for assisting an operator in endoscopic navigation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11744445
  • Patent Number
    11,744,445
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 24, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 5, 2023
    8 months ago
Abstract
A medical system comprises an elongate instrument including a camera configured to capture at least one real-time image of anatomy within a patient anatomy. The medical system further comprises a processor configured to display, on one or more display screens: a three-dimensional patient computer model of the patient anatomy; a synthetic representation of the elongate instrument registered to the three-dimensional patient computer model; over the patient computer model, a representation of a view angle of the elongate instrument, the representation of the view angle being displayed so as to appear to project from a distal tip of the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument; and in a position based on the registration of the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument to the patient computer model, the at least one captured real-time image so as to appear to project from the distal tip of the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to steerable endoscopes and in particular, to a method and system for assisting an operator in endoscopic navigation.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Minimally invasive surgical procedures are known to offer many benefits over traditional open surgery techniques, including less pain, shorter hospital stays, quicker return to normal activities, minimal scarring, reduced recovery time, and less injury to tissue. To perform such procedures, entry into the patient may be made through an incision or a natural body orifice. Both robotic and manually operated minimally invasive surgical devices may be used.


One example of a minimally invasive surgical robotic system is the da Vinci® Surgical System from Intuitive Surgical, Inc., of Sunnyvale, Calif. The da Vinci® Surgical System has a number of robotic arms that move attached medical devices, such as an image capturing device and Intuitive Surgical's proprietary EndoWrist® articulating surgical instruments, in response to movement of input devices by a surgeon viewing images captured by the image capturing device at a surgical site. Each of the medical devices may be inserted through its own minimally invasive incision into the patient and positioned to perform a medical procedure at the surgical site. The incisions are placed about the patient's body so that the surgical instruments may be used to cooperatively perform the medical procedure and the image capturing device may view it without their robotic arms colliding during the procedure.


An endoscope is a medical device that allows physicians to capture images of and diagnose problems with internal body organs by inserting the device either through a natural orifice or a surgeon created opening and guiding it to a target site within a patient. In some cases, it may also be used to perform medical procedures on the internal body organs. It may be steerable so that its distal tip is controllably oriented for navigation purposes. An image capturing device such as a stereoscopic or monoscopic camera may be provided at its distal tip so that images captured by the camera from that perspective may be viewed on a display screen by the surgeon. To perform various medical procedures at the target site, surgical tools, such as those used for cutting, grasping, cauterizing, etc., may extend out of the endoscope's distal tip.


The endoscope may be rigid such as those used in laparoscopy or it may be flexible so that it is capable of following the curvatures of body lumens. It may also be rigidizable and/or robotic. A rigidizable endoscope is an endoscope that has at least one section of its flexible body that can be made substantially rigid by a mechanical locking mechanism. A robotic endoscope is a flexible endoscope that has at least one section that bends under a computer controlled servo mechanism. It may also be a capsule like the EndoCapsule by Olympus or a tethered capsule in which case it is not controllably oriented for navigation purposes and gets moved in the patient anatomy by gravity, forces applied by the anatomy or by other surgical devices.


Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (“NOTES”) may employ a steerable endoscope to perform surgical procedures on patients. As an example, a flexible endoscope may be guided through one of the body's orifices and enter the abdomen from the inside of the patient, rather than through a minimally invasive incision from the outside. For example, in “transgastric” surgery, instruments are passed through the mouth and into the stomach. A gastrostomy is then performed so that the instruments may enter the abdomen and be used by the surgeon to perform a medical procedure within the abdominal cavity. Once the procedure is completed, the instruments are withdrawn along with any tissue removed during the procedure, and the entry point is closed back up. Because no incisions are made in the patient to accommodate entry of the endoscope, NOTES may be even less painful than surgery using minimally invasive incisions. Also, since it uses a natural body orifice instead of incisions to enter the body, it may result in reduced needs for general anesthetics and faster recovery times.


During the operation of a steerable endoscope, such as in a NOTES application, the endoscope tip may be turned multiple times and in different directions while moving towards a target site. As a consequence, the flexible endoscope may wind up looping around itself and disorienting the operator so as to make it difficult for the operator to keep track of the current direction of the endoscope tip if its captured image fails to clearly indicate its current direction with respect to the target site. In contrast, the operator may have a relatively rigid connection to the view in conventional laparoscopy.


If the operator accidentally moves the endoscope tip in the wrong direction, the tip may inadvertently perforate or otherwise damage tissue causing harm to the patient. Even if such harm is avoided by carefully moving the endoscope tip, additional time is required to repeatedly ascertain the true direction of the endoscope relative to the target site in the patient. Thus, the time required to perform the procedure is lengthened which adds to the cost of the surgery and increases health safety concerns.


OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, one object of one or more aspects of the present invention is a method, and a system for performing the method, of providing navigation guidance for assisting an operator in steering an endoscope towards a site in a patient.


Another object of one or more aspects of the present invention is a method, and a system for performing the method, of providing information to an operator of an endoscope that visually indicates the direction that the endoscope tip is currently pointing towards.


Still another object of one or more aspects of the present invention is a method, and a system for performing the method, of providing information to an operator of an endoscope that visually indicates the current position and shape of the endoscope relative to the anatomy of a patient.


These and additional objects are accomplished by the various aspects of the present invention, wherein briefly stated, one aspect is a computer implemented method for assisting an operator in endoscopic navigation, the method comprising: referencing a computer model of the patient to a reference frame; determining a current position and shape of an endoscopic device relative to the reference frame; generating a computer model of the endoscopic device according to the determined current position and shape; and displaying the computer models of the endoscopic device and patient on a display screen so as to provide the endoscopic navigation assistance to the operator.


Another aspect is a system comprising: a display screen; an endoscopic device; and a processor adapted to reference a computer model of a patient to a reference frame, determine a current position and shape of the endoscopic device relative to the reference frame, generate a computer model of the endoscopic device according to the determined current position and shape, and display the computer models of the endoscopic device and patient on the display screen so as to provide navigation assistance to an operator of the system.


Additional objects, features and advantages of the various aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of its preferred embodiment, which description should be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a steerable endoscope system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of a processing portion of a steerable endoscope system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of a teleoperative portion of a steerable endoscope system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a computer implemented method for assisting an operator in endoscopic navigation, utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 5 illustrates parts of a position determining portion of a steerable endoscope system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 6 illustrates a primary display screen displaying an image captured by a steerable endoscope as viewed in a system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 7 illustrates an auxiliary display screen displaying an anterior-posterior view of registered patient and endoscopic device models as generated by a system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 8 illustrates an auxiliary display screen displaying an oblique view of patient and endoscopic device models as generated by a system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 9 illustrates an auxiliary display screen displaying a lateral-medial view of patient and endoscopic device models as generated by a system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 10 illustrates a primary display screen displaying an image captured by an endoscopic device in a main window area and an oblique view of patient and endoscopic device models in a picture-in-picture window area as generated by a system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 11 illustrates a primary display screen displaying an image captured by an endoscopic device in a first area and an oblique view of patient and endoscopic device models in a second area as generated by a system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 12 illustrates a flow diagram of a computer implemented method of providing directional guidance to maneuver an endoscopic device to one or more landmarks, utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 13 illustrates a flow diagram of a computer implemented method for establishing landmarks using an endoscopic device as it moves by the landmarks, utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 14 illustrates an oblique view of a patient torso with an endoscopic device inserted therein and examples of various landmarks as employed in a system utilizing aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 15 illustrates a primary display screen displaying a current image captured by an endoscopic device and graphical representations of various vectors indicating directions to corresponding landmarks along with an image associated with one of the landmarks, according to a method utilizing aspects of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT


FIG. 1 illustrates, as an example, a system 100 including a steerable endoscope 110, one or more fiber optic cables 120 inserted in the endoscope 110, a position processor 130, an image processor 140, an image capturing device 141, a display processor 150, a primary display screen 600, and an auxiliary display screen 160. Although shown as separate units, the position processor 130, image processor 140 and display processor 150 may each be implemented as hardware, firmware, software or a combination thereof, which interact with or are otherwise executed by one or more computers, such as the one or more computers 200 depicted in FIG. 2. The primary and auxiliary display screens, 600 and 160, are preferably computer monitors capable of displaying three-dimensional images to an operator of the system 100. However, for cost considerations, either or both of the primary and auxiliary display screens, 600 and 160, may be a standard computer monitor capable of only displaying two-dimensional images.


The endoscope 110, in this example, has a flexible body 114, a steerable tip 112 at its distal end 111 and a handle or electromechanical interface 116 at its proximal end 115. Control cables (not shown) or other control means typically extend from the handle or electromechanical interface 116 to the steerable tip 112 so that the tip 112 may be controllably bent or turned as shown for example by dotted line versions of the bent tip 112. Although a steerable endoscope is described in this example, the present invention is not to be limited to endoscopes of this type and may be practiced with other endoscopic devices (such as rigid, rigidizable, robotic, or capsule endoscopes) as well.


A stereoscopic or monoscopic camera 141 is provided at the distal end 111 for capturing images that are transmitted to and processed by the image processor 140 and/or display processor 150 and displayed on the primary display screen 600 and/or auxiliary display screen 160 according to the various aspects of the invention as described herein. One of a plurality of fiber optic cables 120 may be coupled at its proximal end to a light source (not shown) for illumination purposes at the distal end 111. Others of the fiber optic cables 120 may be configured with bend or shape sensors such as Fiber Bragg Gratings (or other strain sensors such as those employing Rayleigh scattering) so that light passing through the fiber optic cable is processed by the position processor 130 to determine a current position and shape of the endoscope 110 including the orientation of its distal tip 112. In addition to the fiber optic cables 120 extending through the endoscope 110, one or more additional fiber optic cables (not shown) configured with strain sensors may be attached to the endoscope 110 so as to provide position information of the endoscope 110 at the attachment point.


When the steerable endoscope 110 is manipulated manually by an operator, a handle 116 is used with appropriate levers or other control mechanism(s) for controllably orienting the endoscope tip 112 by pulling appropriate cables (not shown) which couple such control mechanisms of the handle 116 to the tip 112. On the other hand, when the steerable endoscope 110 is manipulated teleoperatively by an operator, an electromechanical interface 116 is used instead of a handle.


As shown in FIG. 3, the electromechanical interface 116 allows the endoscope 110 to be electrically and mechanically coupled to a robot arm 301 whose movement is controlled by a controller 302 in response to operator manipulation of an input device 303. Either or both the interface 116 and the robot arm 301 include motors that drive the cables used to steer the endoscope tip 112. In addition to controlling bending of the endoscope's tip 112, the robot arm 301 may also be configured to insert/retract the endoscope 110 into and out of an aperture (e.g., natural orifice or minimally invasive incision) in the patient, rotate the endoscope 110 about its central axis, and/or rotate the electromechanical interface 116 about a pivot point at the aperture. The controller 302 is preferably implemented as hardware, firmware or software (or a combination thereof) in the one or more computers 200 along with the processors 130, 140, 150.


Details on the determination of the endoscope's position and bending using Fiber Bragg Gratings may be found, for examples, in U.S. 2007/0156019 A1 entitled “Robotic Surgery System Including Position Sensors Using Fiber Bragg Gratings”, U.S. 2008/0212082 A1 entitled “Fiber Optic Position and/or Shape Sensing Based on Rayleigh Scatter”, U.S. 2008/0218770 A1 entitled “Robotic Surgical Instrument and Methods using Bragg Fiber Sensors”, and U.S. application Ser. No. 12/164,829 entitled “Fiber Optic Shape Sensor, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. Details on a conventional steerable endoscope may be found for example in U.S. Pat. No. 6,869,396 B2 entitled “Steerable Endoscope and Improved Method of Insertion”.



FIG. 4 illustrates, as an example, a flow diagram of a computer implemented method 400 for assisting an operator in endoscopic navigation of the steerable endoscope 110 towards a site in a patient. The computer in this case is preferably the one or more computers 200 that include the processors 130, 140, 150.


In 401, a patient computer model stored in memory 155 is referenced to a fixed reference frame (i.e., one that does not move during the medical procedure to be performed using the endoscope 110) by first referencing points on a live patient who is generally prone on an operating table with the fixed reference frame, then associating the referenced points with corresponding points on the patient computer model.


For example, using a pointer device whose tip position may be readily determined in the fixed reference frame (such as the endoscope's tip 112), the operator may move the pointer device so that it first touches the mouth of the patient to establish a first reference point corresponding to the mouth of the patient computer model. The operator may then move the pointer device so that it next touches the right and left crest of the iliac of the patient to establish a second reference point corresponding to the right and left crest of the iliac of the patient computer model. Other points such as the navel and the left and right arm pits may also be used to establish more reference points. By referencing the patient computer model to the patient in this manner, the proper size (i.e., length and width) of the patient computer model may also be established as well as its alignment with the patient and its position in the fixed reference frame. Thus, with just a few points, the patient computer model may be properly scaled and aligned (i.e., conformed) with the patient using model information in an anthropometry database in the memory 155.


Several patient computer models may be stored in memory 155. For example, a number of generic patient computer models may be stored so that a different model may be used depending on the age, sex, size, etc., of the patient. Preferably, each of the models is a three-dimensional computer model including at least a head and torso (such as seen in FIGS. 7-9) so that all natural orifices are included as well as potential target sites for performing diagnostic or surgical procedures on a patient. Three-dimensional computer models of the actual patient may also be stored and used with the present system if available, such as may be generated using a Computed Tomography (CT) scan. Alternatively, the surgeon or assistant may move the distal tip 112 over the surface of the patient's body to map its profile and provide sufficient information to the position processor 130 to generate information for a three-dimensional computer model of the patient which it stores in the memory 155.


In 402, a determination is made whether or not the operator has issued a start guidance command. The operator may issue the start guidance command in any one of a number of ways such as depressing an input button or flipping a switch on the input device 303 when the steerable endoscope 110 is being controlled teleoperatively, or depressing an input button or flipping a switch on the handle 116 when the steerable endoscope 110 is being controlled manually. Other ways may include voice actuation using a microphone and voice recognition processor (not shown) that may be implemented in or operatively coupled to the one or more computers 200; a foot pedal (not shown) that may be depressed by the operator so as to turn on or off the guidance; and a graphical user interface using the auxiliary display screen 160, the primary display screen 600 or another display screen (not shown) that the operator may interact with using an input device.


If the determination in 402 is NO (i.e., navigation guidance mode has not been initiated by the operator), then the method loops through 402 each process cycle (or other programmed cycle) until a YES determination is made, at which time, the method proceeds to 403.


In 403, the current position and shape (e.g., bending) of the endoscope 110 is determined by the position processor 130 using information received from one or more optical fibers configured with shape sensors that has been inserted in the flexible body 114 of the endoscope 110. As an example of one such optical fiber, referring to FIG. 5, the distal end of an optical fiber 501 extends to the endoscope's tip 112 and its proximal end is attached to a base point 502 whose position in the fixed reference frame is known or readily determinable by the position processor 130. Preferably, the position processor 130 is also attached or otherwise coupled to the base point 502 so that the processor 130 may receive information from the bend sensors of the optical fiber 501 at that point.


Since the length of the fiber optic cable 501 is known, its proximal end is fixed to a known location, and its distal end extends out the endoscope's tip 112, the current position and orientation of the tip 112 in the fixed reference frame may be readily determined from the current bending of the optical fiber 501 as indicated by information received from the bend sensors. Although only one fiber optic cable 501 is shown for illustrative purposes, multiple fibers or a single fiber with multiple cores configured with strain sensors are preferably employed for determining the shape of the endoscope body 114 and distal tip 112, such as described using shape sensors in previously incorporated by reference U.S. 2007/0156019 A1, U.S. 2008/0212082 A1, and U.S. application Ser. No. 12/164,829.


In 404, a computer model that is indicative of the current configuration of the flexible endoscope 110 is generated using a model of the endoscope stored in the memory 155 and modifying it to reflect the shape information received from the optical fibers configured as shape sensors. Preferably, both the stored and generated computer models of the endoscope 110 are three-dimensional models.


In 405, the patient computer model generated in 401 and the endoscope computer model generated in 404 are displayed together properly registered with respect to each other according to their respective positions in the fixed reference frame on the auxiliary display screen 160. Thus, the operator of the steerable endoscope 110 is provided a view of the current shape of the endoscope 110 relative to the patient's body in order to provide guidance to the operator for navigating the endoscope 110 to a target site within the patient. A visual indication of the target site may also be displayed as well as computer models or other indications of any anatomic structures or body lumens that the endoscope 110 may encounter or pass through in its path to the target site.


The manner in which the patient and endoscope computer models are displayed on the auxiliary display screen 160 is preferably selectable by the operator using any one or more of a number of well known techniques such as clickable icons and pull down menus provided on the auxiliary display screen 160 and/or primary display screen 600. For example, icons may be provided on the auxiliary display screen 160 so that the operator may select an anterior-posterior view 750, oblique view 751, or lateral-medial view 752 of the patient and endoscope 110, such as shown respectively in FIGS. 7, 8 and 9, by clicking on the appropriate icon using a computer mouse or other suitable device.


Referring to FIG. 7, the anterior-posterior view 750 of the patient computer model 720 and endoscope computer model 710 is shown along with indications of various landmarks along the endoscope's path (e.g., mouth entry, esophagus, stomach entry, and colon) on the auxiliary display screen 160. In addition, real-time images captured by the endoscope 110 (such as the captured image 650 shown in FIG. 6 being displayed on a primary display screen 600) may also be displayed on the auxiliary display screen 160 adjacent to (or appearing to emanate from) the distal end 711 of the endoscope computer model 710.


In addition to (or alternative of) displaying the patient and endoscope computer models, 720 and 710, on the auxiliary display screen 160, the computer models may be displayed on the primary display screen 600 along with the captured image 650. For example, the oblique view 751 may be shown as a picture-in-picture insert to the captured image 650 on the primary display screen 600 as shown in FIG. 10 or it may be shown in an adjacent window to that of the captured image 650 on the primary display screen 600 as shown in FIG. 11.


Referring back to FIG. 4, in 406, a determination is made whether or not the operator has issued a stop guidance command. The operator may issue the stop guidance command in any one of a number of ways similar to, but complementary of those in which the operator issues the start guidance command.


If the determination in 406 is NO (i.e., navigation guidance mode has not been stopped by the operator), then the method loops back to 403 to update the current position and bend of the endoscope 110 and display a computer model of it along with the computer model of the patient for the next process cycle (or other programmed cycle). On the other hand, if the determination in 406 is YES (i.e., navigation guidance mode has been stopped by the operator), then the method proceeds to 407 in which the display processor 150 either causes the computer models of the patient and endoscope to no longer be displayed on the auxiliary display screen 160 and/or primary display screen 600 or freezes them on the display screen.


During the whole endoscopic procedure, starting from the insertion of the endoscope 110 in the patient's body, the proposed method and invention stores in the memory device 155 digital versions of images periodically captured by the camera 141 (at the distal tip 112 of the endoscope 110) together with the three-dimensional (3-D) position and orientation information of the camera 141 (as determined by the position processor 130) with respect to the patient anatomy at the times (e.g., at a processing rate of 30 HZ) that the images were captured. Timestamps indicating the times are also stored in the memory device 155. The resulting database provides endoscopic images tagged by their respective 3-D locations in the fixed reference frame that can be accessed at any successive time by the display processor 150 for the purpose of computing synthetic two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) views of the visited anatomy. Thus, a full recording of the endoscopic procedure may be stored in the memory device 155 (preferably a mass storage device, such as a hard drive, for this application) that may be played back on the display screens 600 and 160 for educational and/or archival purposes.


A first synthetic 2-D view can be computed by assembling (stitching together) multiple endoscopic images taken from neighboring 3-D locations into a single larger panoramic image according to the well known Computer Vision technique known as mosaicking (see for instance the seminal work by R. Szeliski, H. Y. Shum, Creating full view panoramic image mosaics and environment maps, In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 1997.) Endoscopic panoramas allow improved endoscopic navigation by providing a larger field of view then the endoscopic camera is capable of hence delivering greater awareness of the surrounding anatomy to the surgeon. Thus, the captured images shown in various figures herein on the primary display screen 600 are preferably panoramic images generated by the display processor 150 by mosaicking images retrieved from the memory device 155 which are representative of the most recently captured images by the camera 141.


As an additional endoscopic navigation tool, graphical indications showing steering directions to previously defined landmarks in the patient are also provided as an aspect of the present invention.



FIG. 12 illustrates, as an example, a flow diagram of a computer implemented method 1200 for providing directional guidance to maneuver the steerable endoscope 110 to one or more landmarks in a patient. The computer in this case is preferably the one or more computers 200 that include the processors 130, 140, 150.


In 1201, a determination is made whether or not the operator has turned on a landmarks directional guidance mode. The operator may turn on and/or off this mode in any one of a number of ways such as depressing an input button or flipping a switch on the input device 303 when the steerable endoscope 110 is being controlled teleoperatively, or depressing an input button or flipping a switch on the handle 116 when the steerable endoscope 110 is being controlled manually. Other ways may include voice actuation using a microphone and voice recognition processor (not shown) that may be implemented in or operatively coupled to the one or more computers 200; a foot pedal (not shown) that may be depressed by the operator so as to turn on or off the mode; and a graphical user interface (GUI) 202 using the display screen 600 that the operator may interact with using an input device 201 as shown in FIG. 2 to turn on and off the mode as well as specify other aspects or parameters of the method as described herein.


If the determination in 1201 is NO (i.e., landmark directional guidance is turned off), then the method loops through 1201 each process cycle (or other programmed cycle) until a YES determination is made, at which time, the method proceeds to 1202.


In 1202, the current position of the endoscope tip 112 in a fixed reference frame (i.e., a reference frame that does not move during the performance of a medical procedure using the endoscope 110) is determined by the position processor 130 using information received from the optical fibers configured with strain sensors (e.g., optical fiber 501 in FIG. 5) that have been inserted in the flexible body 114 of the endoscope 110.


The current position and orientation of the endoscope tip 112 may be readily determined in the fixed reference frame (for example, as previously explained in reference to 403 of FIG. 4) from the current bending of the optical fibers as indicated by information received from their strain sensors since their lengths are known, their proximal ends are fixed to a known location (such as fiber 501 to base point 502 as shown in FIG. 5), and their distal ends extend to the endoscope's tip 112.


In 1203, a vector connecting the current position of the endoscope tip 112 to the position of each landmark to which guidance indications are to be provided is determined by the display processor 150 using the endoscope tip position determined in 1202 and landmark positions stored in the memory device 155.


Typically, the landmarks are established by the operator as he or she guides the steerable endoscope 110 along its path from an entry point to a target site in the patient. As an example, FIG. 14 shows an oblique view of a patient's head and torso where the steerable endoscope 110 has entered through the patient's mouth and its tip 112 guided to a target site. In this example, the endoscope 110 has been guided through the esophagus to the patient's stomach. The stomach was then entered and the endoscope 110 guided to the target site. Along the way, landmarks are established at the mouth entry and stomach entry using a method such as described below in reference to FIG. 13.


Alternatively, the positions of landmarks within the patient may be based upon preoperative measured data such as generated by Computer Axial Tomography (CAT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), or X-rays. In this case, the patient's body (as he or she is lying down on the operating room table) is referenced to the fixed reference frame and the landmarks are registered with the patient's body so that their positions are determinable in the fixed reference frame by their respective positions in the patient's body. The landmark positions are then stored in the memory device 155 (or other storage device accessible to the display processor 150). Although establishing landmarks in this manner may be time consuming and expensive, it allows the method described herein to provide directional guidance to landmarks in front of the endoscope tip 112 (i.e., between the current position of the endoscope tip and the target site), not just behind it (i.e., between the entry point into the patient and the current position of the endoscope tip).


In 1204, the vectors determined in 1203 are then transformed from the fixed reference frame to a reference frame associated with the endoscope tip 112 (or camera 141) by the display processor 150.


In 1205, 3-D arrows (or other graphical representations) indicative of the transformed vectors determined in 1204 are generated by the display processor 150. The directions of the 3-D arrows are referenced to the endoscope tip's reference frame so that they correspond to directions that the operator should steer the endoscope's tip 112 using the handle or electromechanical interface 116 as previously described.


The sizes of the 3-D arrows, on the other hand, may be generated so as to be proportional to the magnitudes of the translated vectors so that landmarks further away are represented by larger arrows. As an alternative, the sizes may be generated so as to be inversely proportional to the magnitudes of the translated vectors so that landmarks further away are represented by smaller arrows. As yet another alternative, the sizes may be generated so as to each have the same length (such as shown by arrows 1511, 1512 and 1513 in FIG. 15).


The 3-D arrows may also be color-coded so that the color of each arrow is uniquely associated with a particular anatomic structure. For example, referring to FIG. 15, a 3-D arrow 1511 indicating a steering direction towards the mouth entry landmark may be colored red, a 3-D arrow 1512 indicating a steering direction towards the stomach entry landmark may be colored yellow, and 3-D arrow 1513 indicating a steering direction towards the colon entry landmark may be colored blue. Alternatively, the edges of the display screen 600 may be colored to correspond to landmarks. The color schemes used herein may be operator defined or correspond to the color scheme used on MR viewers.


In 1206, the 3-D arrows (or other graphical representations) generated in 1205 and a current image (as currently captured at the endoscope tip 112 and processed by the image processor 140 or a panoramic image as previously described using mosaicking of the current and previously captured images) are displayed on the primary display screen 600 by the display processor 150. In addition, previously captured images of the landmarks may also be selectively or automatically retrieved from the memory device 155 and displayed adjacent or otherwise proximate to their respective 3-D arrows. The positions of the 3-D arrows may be displayed on the display screen 600 so as to relate to the orientations of the translated vectors so that, for example, arrows pointing to the left are positioned on the left side of the image and arrows pointing to the right are positioned on the right side of the image. Alternatively, the 3-D arrows may all be positioned near the same side of the image or spaced around the image. In the case where edges of the display screen 600 may be colored to correspond to landmarks, the 3-D arrow corresponding to each landmark is displayed adjacent its respective colored edge so that the association of the 3-D arrow and landmark is clear.


In addition to showing the landmarks as 3-D arrows on or near the current endoscope image on the primary display screen 600, the landmarks can be displayed together with the 3-D patient and endoscope computer models being displayed on the auxiliary display screen 160 wherein positions of stored landmarks may be shown in their proper locations relative to the patient computer model. The landmarks may be indicated, for example, by a text label with the landmark name, a thumbnail image with the stored endoscope image captured with the landmark, a small graphic icon related to the type of landmark, or with an approximate 3-D model of the landmark.


Selection of which, if any, landmark images are to be displayed may be made by the operator, for example, using the input device 201 and GUI 202 to select one display option from a menu including: all landmark images to be displayed, no landmark images displayed, and only nearest landmark image to be displayed. Alternatively, the operator may not be provided an option and the choice pre-selected and programmed into the display processor 150. Position, size, color and other options for displaying the 3-D arrows on the display screen 600 may be selected by the operator using the input device 201 and GUI 202 as shown in FIG. 2.


As an example of such displaying, FIG. 15 shows the display screen 600 having a current image 1501 (i.e., an image currently captured by the endoscope 110 or a panoramic image as described elsewhere herein) displayed on it along with arrows 1511, 1512 and 1513 respectively providing directional guidance to the mouth entry, stomach entry and colon entry landmarks. In addition, a previously captured image 1523 of the colon entry landmark is shown being displayed in a window adjacent to its associated arrow 1513, which happens to be the nearest landmark to the current position of the endoscope tip 112.


In 1207, a determination is made whether or not the operator has turned off the landmark directional guidance mode. The operator may turn off the mode in any one of a number of ways similar to, but in an opposite manner of those in which the operator turned on the landmark guidance mode (e.g., placing a switch in an “off” vs. “on” position).


If the determination in 1207 is NO (i.e., landmark directional guidance mode has not been turned off by the operator), then the method loops back to 1202 to update the landmark directional vectors (e.g., 1511, 1512, 1513 in FIG. 15) as the endoscope tip 112 is being guided to the target site and display updated graphical representations of the translated vectors on the display screen 600 along with a current image captured by the endoscope 110. On the other hand, if the determination in 1207 is YES (i.e., landmark direction guidance mode has been turned off by the operator), then the method proceeds to 1208 in which the display processor 150 causes the graphical representations of the translated vectors and any corresponding landmark captured images to no longer be displayed on the display screen 600.


It is to be appreciated that even though landmark directional guidance mode may be turned off, the operator may still be guiding the steerable endoscope 110 towards the target site and continually updated images captured at the endoscope tip 112 (and processed by image processor 130) may still be displayed on the display screen 600 by the display processor 150. For example, referring to FIG. 15, the display screen 600 may still have the current or panoramic image 1501 displayed on it, but the arrows 1511, 1512, 1513 and landmark image 1523 are no longer displayed after the operator turns off the landmark directional guidance mode.


It is also to be appreciated that the operator may interactively establish landmarks for which directional guidance is to be provided at any time while guiding the steerable endoscope 110 towards the target site. In particular, landmark establishment may be performed while landmark directional guidance mode is turned on as well as off.



FIG. 13 illustrates, as an example, a computer implemented method 1300 for establishing anatomic structure landmarks as the steerable endoscope 110 is being guided through a patient's body. As in the case of the method 1200 described in reference to FIG. 12, the computer in this case is preferably the one or more computers 200 that include the processors 130, 140, 150. In particular, it is preferably performed by the display processor 150 concurrently with other activities performed by the display processor 150 as described herein.


In 1301, a landmark establishment request is received from the operator. The operator may initiate the request in any one of various well known interactive techniques including those previously described in reference to turning on and off the landmark directional guidance mode (but preferably a different one so as not confuse the two actions).


In 1302, the current position of the endoscope tip 112 in the fixed reference frame is determined. Note that if the landmark directional guidance mode is turned on, this action is the same as 1202 of method 1200 and therefore, it does not have to be performed since the result from 1202 may be used in this case (i.e., it does not have to be performed a second time or twice in the same process cycle).


In 1303, the current position of the endoscope tip 112 is then stored in the memory device 155 and referenced as the position of the landmark whose establishment has been requested. In 1304, a current image captured at the endoscope tip 112 is identified as an image of the landmark and in 1305, information of the image is also stored in the memory device 155 and referenced as the image of the landmark whose establishment has been requested.


As may be appreciated in performing the method 1300, the order in which actions 1302 and 1304 occur is not important. In fact, the image processor 140 may process captured images at a different rate than that in which the position processor 130 determines current positions of the endoscope tip 112. Therefore, the two actions may differ in the time as well as in the order in which they may each occur. In any event, upon receiving the landmark establishment request in 1301, the next determined position of the endoscope tip 112 is stored in the memory device 155 and the next captured image received from the image processor 130 is stored in the memory device 155 without concern about which one occurs first.


In addition to the establishment of landmarks while navigating the endoscope 110 towards a target site within the patient, anatomic structures (such as the esophagus, stomach, colon, etc.) may be measured using position information of the endoscope tip 112 as it moves from one end of the anatomic structure to the other. Information of the measured anatomic structure may than be used to align and size 3-D models or preoperative measured data of the anatomic structures to their proper positions inside the patient's body and display the structures together with the 3-D patient computer model on the auxiliary display screen 160. As an example, FIG. 14 shows how the measured positions of the mouth and stomach entry landmarks have been used, together with the intermediate shape of the endoscope, to align and size a 3-D model of the esophagus connecting the mouth to the stomach entry. The esophagus model is then displayable as a 3-D curved tube 1401, together with the 3-D models of the patient and the endoscope 110 on the auxiliary display screen 160.


Although the various aspects of the present invention have been described with respect to one or more preferred embodiments, it will be understood that the invention is entitled to full protection within the full scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A medical system comprising: an elongate instrument including a camera configured to capture at least one real-time image of anatomy within a patient anatomy;a processor configured to display, on one or more display screens: a three-dimensional patient computer model of the patient anatomy;a synthetic representation of the elongate instrument registered to the three-dimensional patient computer model;over the three-dimensional patient computer model, a representation of a view angle of the elongate instrument, wherein the representation of the view angle is displayed so as to appear to project from a distal tip of the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument; andin a position based on the registration of the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument to the three-dimensional patient computer model, the at least one captured real-time image so as to appear to project from the distal tip of the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument.
  • 2. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the elongate instrument includes at least one sensor for determining shape.
  • 3. The medical system of claim 2, wherein the at least one sensor includes an optical fiber extending along the elongate instrument.
  • 4. The medical system of claim 2, wherein the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument is generated based on shape information from the at least one sensor.
  • 5. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument is a three-dimensional synthetic representation.
  • 6. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument is registered to the three-dimensional patient computer model to provide endoscopic navigation assistance to an operator.
  • 7. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the three-dimensional patient computer model includes an exterior model including a torso of a patient.
  • 8. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the three-dimensional patient computer model is generated from a computed tomography scan.
  • 9. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to display, on the one or more display screens, an indicator of a target site within the patient anatomy modeled by the three-dimensional patient computer model.
  • 10. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument is selectable from a plurality of directional view synthetic representations of the elongate instrument.
  • 11. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument represents a length of the elongate instrument extending from a distal portion of the elongate instrument to a portion of the elongate instrument at an anatomic entry point of the patient anatomy registered to the three-dimensional patient computer model.
  • 12. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument represents a length of the elongate instrument extending from a distal portion of the elongate instrument to a portion of the elongate instrument at an organ entry point of an organ of the patient anatomy registered to the three-dimensional patient computer model.
  • 13. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the elongate instrument comprises a teleoperatively steerable portion for insertion within the patient anatomy.
  • 14. The medical system of claim 1, wherein the camera is configured to capture a plurality of real-time images of the anatomy, and wherein the processor is configured to generate a panoramic image from the plurality of captured real-time images by mosaicking each captured real-time image of the plurality of captured real-time images together.
  • 15. The medical system of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to display, on the one or more display screens, the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument and the three-dimensional patient computer model as a picture-in-picture over the panoramic image.
  • 16. A computer implemented method comprising: generating a three-dimensional patient computer model of a patient anatomy;generating a synthetic representation of an elongate instrument, the elongate instrument including a camera configured to capture at least one real-time image of anatomy within the patient anatomy; anddisplaying, on one or more display screens: the three-dimensional patient computer model;the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument registered to the three-dimensional patient computer model;over the three-dimensional patient computer model, a representation of a view angle of the elongate instrument, wherein the representation of the view angle is displayed so as to appear to project from a distal tip of the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument; andin a position based on the registration of the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument to the three-dimensional patient computer model, the at least one captured real-time image so as to appear to project from the distal tip of the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument.
  • 17. The computer implemented method of claim 16, further comprising receiving shape information from at least one sensor of the elongate instrument, wherein generating the synthetic representation of the elongate instrument includes generating the synthetic representation based on the shape information.
  • 18. The computer implemented method of claim 17, wherein receiving the shape information includes receiving shape information from an optical fiber extending along the elongate instrument.
  • 19. The computer implemented method of claim 16, further comprising displaying, on the one or more display screens, an indicator of a target site within the patient anatomy modeled by the three-dimensional patient computer model.
  • 20. The computer implemented method of claim 16, further comprising generating a panoramic image from a plurality of real-time images captured by the camera by mosaicking each captured real-time image of the plurality of captured real-time images together.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/725,592, filed Dec. 23, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/074,663, filed Mar. 18, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,524,641, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/411,501, filed Mar. 26, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,004,387, entitled “Method and System for Assisting an Operator in Endoscopic Navigation,” all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (165)
Number Name Date Kind
5432543 Hasegawa et al. Jul 1995 A
5517990 Kalfas et al. May 1996 A
5638819 Manwaring et al. Jun 1997 A
5681260 Ueda et al. Oct 1997 A
5729129 Acker Mar 1998 A
5732703 Kalfas et al. Mar 1998 A
5765561 Chen et al. Jun 1998 A
5776050 Chen et al. Jul 1998 A
5797849 Vesely et al. Aug 1998 A
5840024 Taniguchi et al. Nov 1998 A
5893045 Kusama et al. Apr 1999 A
5928248 Acker Jul 1999 A
5951475 Gueziec et al. Sep 1999 A
5997473 Taniguchi et al. Dec 1999 A
6059718 Taniguchi et al. May 2000 A
6106466 Sheehan et al. Aug 2000 A
6246898 Vesely et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256090 Chen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6295368 Hasegawa et al. Sep 2001 B1
6346940 Fukunaga Feb 2002 B1
6468203 Belson Oct 2002 B2
6468265 Evans et al. Oct 2002 B1
6511417 Taniguchi et al. Jan 2003 B1
6522906 Salisbury, Jr. et al. Feb 2003 B1
6580938 Acker Jun 2003 B1
6610007 Belson et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612980 Chen et al. Sep 2003 B2
6747646 Gueziec et al. Jun 2004 B2
6774624 Anderson et al. Aug 2004 B2
6775404 Pagoulatos et al. Aug 2004 B1
6868195 Fujita Mar 2005 B2
6869396 Belson Mar 2005 B2
6890297 Belson May 2005 B2
6892090 Verard et al. May 2005 B2
6923768 Camus et al. Aug 2005 B2
6978166 Foley et al. Dec 2005 B2
7044907 Belson May 2006 B2
7072707 Galloway, Jr. et al. Jul 2006 B2
7087013 Belson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7139601 Bucholz et al. Nov 2006 B2
7144367 Chen et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155315 Niemeyer et al. Dec 2006 B2
7195587 Taniguchi et al. Mar 2007 B2
7233820 Gilboa Jun 2007 B2
7300398 Chefdhotel et al. Nov 2007 B2
7343195 Strommer et al. Mar 2008 B2
7366562 Dukesherer et al. Apr 2008 B2
7381183 Hale et al. Jun 2008 B2
7398116 Edwards Jul 2008 B2
7427263 Hoeg et al. Sep 2008 B2
7517320 Wibowo et al. Apr 2009 B2
7542791 Mire et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561733 Vilsmeier et al. Jul 2009 B2
7599730 Hunter et al. Oct 2009 B2
7636595 Marquart et al. Dec 2009 B2
7657300 Hunter et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660623 Hunter et al. Feb 2010 B2
7697972 Verard et al. Apr 2010 B2
7751865 Jascob et al. Jul 2010 B2
7756563 Higgins et al. Jul 2010 B2
7818044 Dukesherer et al. Oct 2010 B2
7840253 Tremblay et al. Nov 2010 B2
7857753 Onoda et al. Dec 2010 B2
7889905 Higgins et al. Feb 2011 B2
7901348 Soper et al. Mar 2011 B2
7967742 Hoeg et al. Jun 2011 B2
7971341 Dukesherer et al. Jul 2011 B2
8050523 Younge et al. Nov 2011 B2
8050532 Katayama Nov 2011 B2
8062212 Belson Nov 2011 B2
8102416 Ito et al. Jan 2012 B2
8116847 Gattani et al. Feb 2012 B2
8180428 Kaiser et al. May 2012 B2
8226546 Belson Jul 2012 B2
8239001 Verard et al. Aug 2012 B2
8273013 Niwa et al. Sep 2012 B2
8308635 Tanaka et al. Nov 2012 B2
8320991 Jascob et al. Nov 2012 B2
8337397 Prisco et al. Dec 2012 B2
8597177 Sano et al. Dec 2013 B2
8600478 Verard et al. Dec 2013 B2
8641602 Belson Feb 2014 B2
8801601 Prisco et al. Aug 2014 B2
10004387 Prisco et al. Jun 2018 B2
10524641 Prisco Jan 2020 B2
10856770 Prisco et al. Dec 2020 B2
20010027272 Saito et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020087169 Brock et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020188174 Aizawa et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030038802 Johnson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030055317 Taniguchi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055410 Evans et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030114730 Hale et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030220541 Salisbury et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040019254 Belson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040138548 Strommer et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040152972 Hunter Aug 2004 A1
20040199072 Sprouse et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050004449 Mitschke et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050020878 Ohnishi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033149 Strommer et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050054895 Hoeg et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050085718 Shahidi Apr 2005 A1
20050113643 Hale et al. May 2005 A1
20050143651 Verard et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154259 Demarco Jul 2005 A1
20050182319 Glossop Aug 2005 A1
20050197559 Boese et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050222497 Belson Oct 2005 A1
20050261550 Akimoto et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060009679 Ito et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013523 Childlers et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060058647 Strommer et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060149134 Soper et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060184016 Glossop Aug 2006 A1
20060264740 Van et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060269275 Krause et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070065077 Childers et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066866 Noguchi et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066887 Mire et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070135803 Belson Jun 2007 A1
20070156019 Larkin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173694 Tsuji et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070197896 Moll et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070265503 Schlesinger et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270650 Eno et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070293721 Gilboa Dec 2007 A1
20080045794 Belson Feb 2008 A1
20080071142 Gattani et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071143 Gattani et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080114238 Lloyd May 2008 A1
20080118135 Averbuch et al. May 2008 A1
20080161677 Sutherland et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195109 Hunter et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080207997 Higgins et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080212082 Froggatt et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080214893 Tartaglia et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080214922 Hartmann et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080218770 Moll et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080262297 Gilboa et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262312 Carroll et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269596 Revie et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080287777 Li et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090027486 Hirakawa et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030306 Miyoshi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090118742 Hartmann et al. May 2009 A1
20090131746 Seo et al. May 2009 A1
20090137952 Ramamurthy et al. May 2009 A1
20090148017 Inoue et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090161927 Mori et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090175518 Ikuma et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192524 Itkowitz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090227861 Ganatra et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090234217 Mire et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090281417 Hartmann et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090324161 Prisco Dec 2009 A1
20090326556 Diolaiti et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100305435 Magill Dec 2010 A1
20110098532 Graumann et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098533 Onoda et al. Apr 2011 A1
20120046521 Hunter et al. Feb 2012 A1
20130231556 Holsing et al. Sep 2013 A1
20190247130 State et al. Aug 2019 A1
20200129045 Prisco Apr 2020 A1
20210177299 Prisco et al. Jun 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
2325036 Apr 2001 CA
1550221 Dec 2004 CN
101026988 Aug 2007 CN
1504712 Feb 2005 EP
WO-9109375 Jun 1991 WO
WO-0224051 Mar 2002 WO
WO-2007023771 Mar 2007 WO
WO-2007036925 Apr 2007 WO
WO-2007113055 Oct 2007 WO
WO-2008065600 Jun 2008 WO
WO-2008094949 Aug 2008 WO
WO-2008097540 Aug 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (89)
Entry
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP22153756, dated May 16, 2022, 11 pages.
Advisory Action dated Mar. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,515, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
Amin D.V. et al., “Ultrasound Registration of the Bone Surface for Surgical Navigation,” Computer Aided Surgery, Jan. 6, 2010, vol. 8 (1), pp. 1-17.
Banovac, Filip et al., “Liver Tumor Biopsy in a Respiring Phantom with the Assistance of a Novel Electromagnetic Navigation Device,” 2002, pp. 200-207, Springer-Verlag.
Bardaro, Sergio Jose and Lee Swanstrom, “Development of advanced endoscopes for Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (Notes),” J. Minimally Invasive Therapy, vol. 15, Issue 6, 2006, pp. 378-383.
Baumhauer M et al., “Navigation in Endoscopic Soft Tissue Surgery: Perspectives and Limitations,” Journal of Endourology, Apr. 2008, vol. 22 (4), 16 pages.
Burschka, Darius et al., “Navigating Inner Space: 3-D Assistance for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2005, pp. 5-26, vol. 52—Issue 1, Elsevier.
Chiu, Adeline M. et al., “3-D Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass,” The Heart Surgery Forum, Jun. 8, 2000, vol. 3—No. 3, pp. 224-231.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand For Jury Trial, Aug. 31, 2018, 14 pages.
Coste-Maniere; Eve et al., “Optimal Planning of Robotically Assisted Heart Surgery: First Results on the Transfer Precision in the Operating Room,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2004, pp. 539-548, vol. 23—Issue 4-5, SAGE Publications.
Da Vinci by Intuitive, Enabling Surgical Care to get Patients Back to what Matters, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, Aug. 29, 2019, Retrieved from the internet: URL: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci], pp. 202 pages.
Decision on Granting Institution of Inter Parties Review 35 U.S.C. 314, dated Dec. 16, 2019 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601 B2, IPR2019-01173, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, 41 pages.
Declaration of Kevin Cleary, PH.D. of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, review No. IPR2019-01173, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc., Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. dated Mar. 6, 2020, 78 pages.
Declaration of Vincent Duindam, PH.D. of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, review No. IPR2019-01173, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc., Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. dated Mar. 4, 2020, 25 pages.
Demand for Jury Trial Public Redacted Version, Defendant Auris Health, Inc. and Third Parties Johnson and Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.'s Responsive Letter to the Court Regarding Discovery, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 234, Apr. 1, 2020, 6 pages.
Demand for Jury Trial Public Redacted Version, Declaration of Jamie L. Kringstein in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc. and Third Parties Johnson and Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.'s Responsive Letter to the Court Regarding Discovery, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 235, Apr. 1, 2020, 4 pages.
Demand for Jury Trial Public Redacted Version, Declaration of Jamie L. Kringstein in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Letter To The Court Regarding Discovery, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 233, Mar. 31, 2020, 5 pages.
Demand For Jury Trial, Redacted Public Version, Defendant's Mar. 31, 2020 Letter To The Honorable Maryellen Noreika Regarding Discovery Dispute Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Mar. 31, 2020, 6 pages.
Demonstratives For Petitioner Auris Health, review No. IPR2019-01173, Petitioner Auris—Ex. 1021, Demonstrative Exhibit—Not Evidence—Auris Health, Inc. v. Intuitive Surgical Ops, Inc, dated Sep. 8, 2020, 33 Pages.
Doignon, C. et al., “Model-based 3-D pose estimation and feature tracking for robot assisted surgery with medical imaging,” published in “From Features to Actions: Unifying Perspectives in Computational and Robot Vision” workshop at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 2007, 10 pages. Internet: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/35/06/47/PDF/2007_wkicra_doignon.pdf.
Examiner Initiated Interview Summary dated May 9, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,515, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
Exhibit 1, Redacted in its Entirety, Demand for Jury Trial, Defendant Auris Health,INC.'s First set of Requests for production to Plaintiffs, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 233-1, 2019, 1-70 pages.
Exhibit 1, Non-party Johnson and Johnson, Inc.'s Responses to Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Subpoena and Requests for Production to Johnson and Johnson (Nos. 1-7), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 235-1, Sep. 20, 2019, 37 pages.
Expert Report of Joseph M. Reinhardt, Ph.d., Regarding Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. And Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, May 21, 2020, 318 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19165830.1 dated Nov. 20, 2019, 7 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15192812.4, dated Jun. 30, 2016, 7 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP21164409.1 dated Apr. 19, 2021, 11 pages.
Final Office Action dated May 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,501, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,515, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/027660, dated Jun. 28, 2010, 12 pages.
ION Endoluminal systems, System, instrucment and accessoried User manual, Auris vs. Intuitive, 2018, 91 pages.
Joint Appendix to Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114, Oct. 29, 2019, 4 pages.
Joint Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 113, Oct. 29, 2019, 103 pages.
Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 76, Aug. 2, 2019, 31 pages.
Judgment Final Written Decision Determining All Challenged Claims Unpatentable of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, Review No. IPR2019-01173, Dec. 11, 2020, 67 pages.
Lau, William W. et al., “Stereo-Based Endoscopic Tracking of Cardiac Surface Deformation,” Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004, pp. 494-501, vol. 2, Springer Verlag.
Levy, L. Campbell et al., “Training for Notes,” J. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, vol. 18, 2008, pp. 343-360.
Luebbers, HT et al., “Comparison of Different Registration Methods for Surgical Navigation in Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 2008, vol. 36 (2), pp. 109-116.
Memorandum Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), 2019, 16 pages.
MicroBIRD, “Miniaturized Sensors for IntraBody Navigation and Localization”, Ascension Technology Corporation, 2004, pp. 1-3.
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,501, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,501, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,501, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/678,917, filed Nov. 16, 2012.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,515, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
Notice of Allowance dated May 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,515, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,515, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 2010823187 filed Mar. 17, 2010, 16 pages.
Order Conduct of the Proceeding, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2019-01173, Case IPR2019-01189, Case IPR2019-01496, Case IPR2019-01547, Dated Dec. 9, 2019, 04 pages.
Patent Owner's Demonstratives of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, Review No. IPR2019-01173, Oral hearing to be held, Sep. 15, 2020, 49 pages.
Patent Owner's Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Sep. 18, 2019, 3 pages.
Patent Owner's Supplemental Brief Regarding Claim Construction of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Dec. 10, 2019, 5 pages.
Patent Owner's Sur-reply of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01173, Jul. 27, 2020, 32 pages.
Patent Owner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, v. Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, Case No. IPR2019-01173 dated Sep. 8, 2020, 4 pages.
Patent Owner's Updated Mandatory Notices of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, v. Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, Case No. IPR2019-01173 dated Sep. 22, 2020, 5 pages.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Sep. 18, 2019, 34 pages.
Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, v. Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Dec. 22, 2020, 72 pages.
Patent Owner's Response of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Mar. 9, 2020, 70 pages.
Patent Owner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01173, Jul. 27, 2020, 4 pages.
Patent Owner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Mar. 9, 2020, 4 pages.
Patent Owner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Dec. 10, 2019, 3 pages.
PCT/US10/27760 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 28, 2010, 14 pages.
Pearl, Jonathan P. and Jeffrey L. Ponsky, “Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Past, present and future,” Editorial in J. Minimal Access Surgery, vol. 3, Issue 2, Apr.-Jun. 2007, pp. 43-46.
Peters T, et al., “Image-Guided Interventions,” Technololgy and Applications, Intuitive Exhibit, 2001, pp. 1-95.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Jun. 12, 2019, 84 pages.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, v. Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, Review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Sep. 8, 2020, 5 pages.
Petitioner's Corrected Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Jun. 20, 2019, 5 pages.
Petitioner's Reply Brief Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01173, Jun. 15, 2020, 31 pages.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations INC, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Jun. 15, 2020, 4 pages.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Dec. 5, 2019, pp. 1-4.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Dec. 9, 2019, pp. 1-4.
Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II: Interactive Technology & Healthcare: Visionary Applications for Simulation Visualization Robotics, 1994, Elsevier, 275 Total Pages.
PTAB Teleconference for review No. IPR2019-01173, dated Dec. 6, 2019, Petitioner Auris Health, Inc, pp. 1-33.
Rao, G.V. et al., “NOTES: Human Experience,” J. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, vol. 18, 2008, pp. 361-370.
Redacted Public Version, Declaration of Jamie L. Kringstein in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Renewed Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, C.A. No. 18-01359-MN, Document 230, Mar. 27, 2020, 3 pages.
Sargent D et al., “Cross Modality Registration of Video and Magnetic Tracker Data for 3D Appearance and Structure Modeling,” Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Mar. 2010, pp. 1-9.
Shaw Keller LLP, Before: The Honorable Maryellen Noreika, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al. v. Auris Health, Inc., BY Karen Keller, ESQ. Nov. 20, 2019, pp. 1-162.
Shaw Keller LLP, Responsive Letter to Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 236, Apr. 1, 2020, 1-117 pages.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Mar. 31, 2020, pp. 1-77.
Shuhaiber J.H., “Augmented Reality in Surgery”, American Medical Association, Feb. 2004, vol. 139, pp. 170-174.
Stipulation Regarding Prior art, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand For Jury Trial, CA No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 4, 2020, 4 pages.
Supplemental Briefing Regarding Claim Construction Arguments and Rulings in Parallel District Court Action of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, Review No. IPR2019-01173 dated Dec. 10, 2019, 6 pages.
Swanstrom, Lee and Bin Zheng, “Spatial Orientation and Off-Axis Challenges for Notes,” J. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, vol. 18, 2008, pp. 315-324.
Szeliski, Richard and Heung-Yeung Shum, “Creating full view panoramic image mosaics and environment maps,” Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH '97), Aug. 3-8, 1997, Los Angeles, California, published by ACM, pp. 251-258.
Szeliski, Richard, “Image Alignment and Stitching: A Tutorial,” Preliminary Draft dated Jan. 26, 2005, Microsoft Technical Report MSR-TR-2004-92, 71 pages.
The American Heritage College Dictionary, Fourth edition, Petitioner Auris Health, Inc, EX. 1015, Feb. 5, 2016, 3 pages.
The Petition email to Board dated Nov. 20, 2019, 2 page.
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages.
Weller S., He Helped Pioneer Robotic Surgery. Now He Wants to Reinvent Lung Cancer Care, JNJ.com, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-2, Apr. 2019, 155 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220007919 A1 Jan 2022 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 16725592 Dec 2019 US
Child 17484192 US
Parent 15074663 Mar 2016 US
Child 16725592 US
Parent 12411501 Mar 2009 US
Child 15074663 US