The field of the invention relates generally to rotating machinery, and more specifically, to a system and method for creep measurement of rotating components.
As rotatable machines operate, a condition of components of the machine may deteriorate over time. This degradation of condition typically affects performance. Degradation may be due to various factors. One such factor is the deformation of the material of the component when exposed to stresses less than its yield strength over time, via a mechanism commonly referred to as creep. Creep can degrade gaps between parts that move relative to each other and can create projectile hazards and debris if the creep is permitted to occur until failure of the component material. Some components, such as turbine blades, are difficult or costly to remove from service for periodic inspections, and scheduled shutdowns for plant maintenance and repair may occur infrequently enough that creep may cause damage before it can be detected and repaired.
A method has been demonstrated to measure strain of rotating components such as turbine parts, using a periodic pattern printed on a part, compared against a referenced pattern to create a moiré pattern. In this method, the moiré pattern created is entirely assumed to be the result of the surface strain or creep of the part, without accounting for any miss-alignment, equipment change, or environmental changes. Hence, there is a need to separately recognize and correct the contribution of these factors in the creation of the moiré pattern, and thereby more accurately measure the actual creep that is undergone by the parts.
In one embodiment, a method of monitoring creep in an object is disclosed. The method includes monitoring a creep sensor assembly that has an image pattern pair disposed on a surface of the object, receiving information from the creep sensor assembly regarding an observed creep associated with the object, receiving information from the creep sensor assembly regarding an offset of the creep sensor assembly, correcting the observed creep using the information regarding the offset, and outputting the corrected information relative to creep. The image pattern pair of the creep sensor assembly includes a first pattern and a second pattern.
In another embodiment, a creep monitoring system for monitoring creep in an object is disclosed. The system includes a creep sensor assembly. The creep sensor assembly includes an image pattern pair including a first pattern and a second pattern disposed on a surface of the object. The creep sensor assembly further includes an optical monitoring system and a processor. The optical monitoring system is in line of sight to the image pattern pair, and configured to collect information regarding observed creep and an offset of the creep sensor assembly. The processor is configured to receive the information regarding the observed creep and the offset; and determine a corrected information relative to creep.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
The following detailed description illustrates embodiments of the invention by way of example and not by way of limitation. It is contemplated that the invention has general application to analytical and methodical embodiments of monitoring creep in moving objects in industrial, commercial, and residential applications.
As used herein, an element or step recited in the singular and preceded with the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding plural elements or steps, unless such exclusion is explicitly recited. Furthermore, references to “one embodiment” of the present invention are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a creep monitoring system for high speed rotating devices, such as, but not limited to, a gas turbine blade. In various embodiments, a creep rate, a crack presence and size, a temperature, and a coating spallation for high speed rotating devices are monitored simultaneously. The creep monitoring system can be a part of a prognosis and health monitoring (PHM) system.
Various manufacturing techniques may be used to form creep sensor assembly 116 (shown in
Various materials may be used to form creep sensor assembly 116 (shown in
In one embodiment of the present invention, a method of monitoring and measuring creep in an object 114 is disclosed. According to this method, instead of one image pattern for measuring the creep, the creep sensor assembly 116 includes an image pattern pair 300 disposed on a surface of the object 114 as shown in
The first pattern 312 and second pattern 314 of the image pattern pair 300 are placed on a surface of the object, either placed adjacent to each other, or partially or fully overlapped with each other so that each pattern 312 and 314 substantially registers the changes happening at that particular part of the object 114. This layout of image pattern pair 300 having adjacent or overlapping first pattern 312 and second pattern 314 is clearly different from having multiple creep sensor assemblies 116 (as shown in
As used herein an “offset” of the creep sensor assembly 116 includes different factors that potentially affect the accuracy of the creep determination. Some non-limiting examples for the causes of offset are described below. The offset may result from a small change in the standoff distance of the optical monitoring system 210 with respect to the object 114 during the measurement, wherein the change in the standoff distance is so small that the operator might not account for the magnification change that result from the change in the standoff distance. Similarly, a small tilt in the optical monitoring system from the ideal angle for recording may introduce an error in the creep measurement, which may be accepted as the correct creep measurement. In one embodiment, if the sensor that records the final pattern and thus creates the moiré pattern is replaced with a new sensor, a small change in the calibration of the new sensor would introduce errors in the creep measurement. In another embodiment, if the overall part (of the object 114) gets heated up and hence the part expands uniformly, the creep sensor assembly 116 may pick up the magnification as a part of the one-directional creep rather than accounting as an overall magnification change.
Embodiments of this invention involve adding other patterns (such as, second pattern 314) to the originally printed pattern 312 on the part, thus enabling the system to compensate for the standoff distance, tilt, or calibration of the sensor as well as other factors that might change the magnifications of the pattern as seen by the optical monitoring system. This correction makes the system highly robust to small setup errors when reading the pattern, thus improving the accuracy of the reading.
The image pattern pair 300 may include different combinations of first pattern 312 and second pattern 314. In one embodiment, the first pattern 312 is a periodic grating and the second pattern 314 is another periodic pattern that is disposed at a finite angle relative to the first pattern. In one particular embodiment, the second pattern 314 is positioned adjacent to, and oriented perpendicular to, the first pattern 312 as shown in
The use of image pattern pair 300 in identifying the errors in creep measurement is explained below using the exemplary pattern pair of
Considering a second pattern 314 oriented perpendicular, and placed adjacent to the first pattern 312, any change in that surface region of the part 114, or change in the image captured by the sensors due to any reason other than the creep resulting from rotational movement, would be captured in the second moiré pattern corresponding to the gratings pattern 314. The moiré pattern of the second pattern 314 would not include any effect of the creep, since the gratings are not patterned in the direction of the rotation and hence should not see strain as the part is assumed to only be stretching in one direction. Therefore, by reading the new pattern also against a reference grating in the sensor (also perpendicular to the original reference), a moiré pattern is produced that can be read by the same analysis as the original pattern. This analysis may be Fourier analysis, fringe counting, or phase shift methods. The change in this adjacent pattern should only be due to other changes (than creep), caused by for example, a change in distance, a change in angle of the view to the surface, or a change due to environmental differences such as elevated temperatures that may cause the whole part to change uniformly (therefore not a surface strain of interest). Thus, the second pattern 314 is used to receive information from the creep assembly 116 regarding an offset of the creep sensor assembly. Hence, by accounting for the errors captured by the second pattern 314 in the creep calculated using the first pattern 312, one may correct the observed creep and determine actual creep of the surface region of the part 114. Since the patterns 312 and 314 are placed adjacent to each other, the corrections would substantially correspond to the surface region that has the first and second patterns printed thereon. The information regarding the offset of the creep sensor assembly 116 may also be obtained from a comparison of relative change in frequency of first 312 and second 314 patterns.
Thus, the method of monitoring creep in the object 114 includes monitoring the creep sensor assembly 116, which includes monitoring the image pattern pair 300 on the surface of the object 114. The information about the observed creep and the offset may be obtained from monitoring the image pattern pair and receiving information regarding the changes happened in the image pattern pair 300. The method further includes correcting the observed creep using the information regarding the offset and outputting the corrected information relative to creep.
For any of the method described above, the grating patterns 312 and 314 could be encoded using such effects as color, fluorescence, or unique structures (such as waves in the lines) to be different from each other so as to be easily distinguished from each other. These methods of encoding would potentially permit both patterns to be overlaid in the same space without interfering with each other (rather than adjacent). The use of color cameras or separate encoded gratings would permit the patterns to be read either sequentially or simultaneously.
By introducing capability for correction into the sensor assembly through the use of pattern pair 300, the system described herein may demonstrate improved robustness and accuracy, because the alignment and standoff of the sensor may be less critical to obtain an accurate reading, when compared to that of a single pattern reading.
The system and method of measuring accurate creep as disclosed in the above embodiments may be used for static as well as dynamic measurements. As used herein “static measurement” refers to the measurements that are performed at a substantially short period after a change in the object 114 occurred. A “dynamic measurement” may be the measurement that is performed when the object 114 is still in movement without substantial intentional delay.
The above-described embodiments of a method and system of measuring the observed creep, measuring the offset, and correcting the observed creep to determine the actual creep, provides a cost-effective and reliable means for providing a lifing prediction for moving objects while in service. As a result, the method and system described herein facilitate managing machinery assets in a cost-effective and reliable manner.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4026660 | Ueda et al. | May 1977 | A |
4490773 | Moffatt | Dec 1984 | A |
4591996 | Vachon | May 1986 | A |
4649759 | Lee | Mar 1987 | A |
4979827 | Matsui | Dec 1990 | A |
5238366 | Ferleger | Aug 1993 | A |
5436462 | Hull-Allen | Jul 1995 | A |
5568259 | Kamegawa | Oct 1996 | A |
6259111 | Tullis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6817528 | Chen | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7064811 | Twerdochlib | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7162373 | Kadioglu et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7360437 | Hardwicke et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7411150 | Lavers et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7493809 | Ward, Jr. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7552647 | Soechting et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7690840 | Zombo et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7787996 | Draper et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7810385 | Narcus | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7905031 | Paulino | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7925454 | Narcus | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8209839 | Brostmeyer et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8525073 | Quitter et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8665426 | Huettner et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8818078 | Telfer et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8818130 | Morgan-Mar et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030063270 | Hunik | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050083032 | Goldfine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070070327 | Asundi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070120561 | Goldfine et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070258807 | Brummel | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090178417 | Draper et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100030493 | Rao | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110099809 | Hovel et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120166102 | Nieters et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176629 | Allen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130057650 | Song et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011027526 | Feb 2011 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Wu et al., “Research on Color Space-Time Coded Structured Light for Molded Line Evaluation in Industrial Site”, International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST), Oct. 13-15, 2010, pp. 1-4. |
Liao et al., “Continuous Turbine Blade Creep Measurement Based on Moiré”, Optical Metrology and Inspection for Industrial Applications II, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 8563, Nov. 20, 2012, pp. 85630H-1-85630H-12. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150107368 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |