The present invention relates generally to credit card transactions and specifically to detecting fraud in such credit card transactions when ordering and downloading information over the Internet.
Credit card transactions are being utilized in a variety of environments. In a typical environment a user provides a merchant with a credit card, and the merchant through various means will verify whether that information is accurate. For example, referring now to
These systems work well in a credit card transaction in which either the customer has a face-to-face meeting with the merchant or the merchant is actually shipping a package or the like to the address of a customer. The verification procedure typically includes receiving at the AVS system address information and identity information. However, when downloading information from an online service or the Internet, the address and identity information are not enough to adequately verify that the customer who is purchasing the goods is actually the owner of the credit card. For example, an individual may have both the name and the address of a particular credit card holder and that information in a normal transaction may be sufficient for authorization of such a transaction. However, in an Internet transaction it is possible to obtain all the correct information related to the particular credit card holder through unscrupulous means, and therefore, be able to fraudulently obtain information.
Accordingly, what is needed is a system and method that overcomes the problems associated with a typical verification system for credit card transactions particularly in the Internet or online services environment The system should be easily implemented within the existing environment and should also be straightforwardly applied to existing technology. The present invention addresses such a need.
A method and system for detecting fraud in a credit card transaction between a consumer and a merchant over the Internet. The method and system comprises obtaining credit card information relating to the transaction from the consumer; and verifying the credit card information based upon a variety of parameters. The variety of parameters are weighted so as to provide a merchant with a quantifiable indication of whether the credit card transaction is fraudulent In so doing, an integrated verification system is provided which allows a merchant, or the like, to accurately and efficiently determine the validity of a transaction over the Internet
The present invention relates to a fraud detection method, system and apparatus for use in credit card transaction over online services or the Internet. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art and the generic principles herein may be applied to other embodiments. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
The present invention provides an integrated verification system for credit card transactions over an online service or the Internet. Referring now to
Consistency check 204 allows IVS 106 to determine whether the credit information is consistent, i.e., does the credit information match the user and other information. AVS system 206 provides similar information as AVS 16 described in
History check 202 is provided which also accesses a history database 222 which may include card number and email information. The history check 202 will also actively determine if the particular transaction matches previous database information within the history database 222. Therefore, the Internet ID verification system 208 and history check 202 increases in utility over time. The Internet ID verification system 208 provides for a system for verifying the validity of Internet address, the details of which will be discussed hereinafter. The Internet identification verification system 208 similar to the history check 202 includes a database 224 which can be added to by other merchants.
In addition, the Internet identification verification system 208 accesses and communicates with a database of Internet addresses. This system will be used to verify whether the Internet address is consistent with other Internet addresses being used in transactions utilizing this credit card.
These different parameters are weighted via weighting blocks 214-220, respectively, dependent upon the particular credit card transaction. For example, if the amount of dollar transaction is critical, it may be appropriate for the history check 202 and AVS system 206 to be weighted more critically than the other parameters. On the other hand, if a critical point is the consistency of the Internet address, then the consistency check 204 and the Internet identification system 208 may be more critical. Accordingly, each of the verification parameters 202-208 may be weighted in different amounts depending upon its importance in the verification process.
A particularly important feature of the present invention is the Internet identification system 208 and its operation within the integrated verification system 106. Through this system 208, it is possible to quickly determine if an Internet identification address is being utilized fraudulently. To describe this feature in more detail refer now to FIG. 4 and the accompanying discussion.
Accordingly, what is provided is a system and method for accurately determining whether a particular credit card transaction is a fraudulent one. The integrated verification system in accordance with the present invention provides for weighting the variety of parameters so as to provide a merchant with a quantifiable indication on whether the credit and transaction is fraudulent.
Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that there could be variations to the embodiment and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, although the present invention was described in terms of a particular verification system, one of ordinary skill in the art readily recognizes, that any number of parameters can be utilized and their use would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, the scope of which is defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3657702 | Stephenson, Jr. | Apr 1972 | A |
3950733 | Cooper et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4044243 | Cooper et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4254474 | Cooper et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
RE30579 | Goldman et al. | Apr 1981 | E |
RE30580 | Goldman et al. | Apr 1981 | E |
4305095 | Dallas | Dec 1981 | A |
4326259 | Cooper et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4485300 | Peirce | Nov 1984 | A |
4510382 | Walter | Apr 1985 | A |
4528643 | Freeny, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4578530 | Zeidler | Mar 1986 | A |
4594663 | Nagata et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4734564 | Boston et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4734858 | Schlafly | Mar 1988 | A |
4755935 | Davis et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4755940 | Brachtl et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760604 | Cooper et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4792968 | Katz | Dec 1988 | A |
4795890 | Goldman | Jan 1989 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4812628 | Boston et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4827508 | Shear | May 1989 | A |
4845739 | Katz | Jul 1989 | A |
4893330 | Franco | Jan 1990 | A |
4897811 | Scofield | Jan 1990 | A |
4922521 | Krikke et al. | May 1990 | A |
4935870 | Burk, Jr. et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4947028 | Gorog | Aug 1990 | A |
4949257 | Orbach | Aug 1990 | A |
4958375 | Reilly | Sep 1990 | A |
4977595 | Ohta et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4982346 | Girouard et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
5025373 | Keyser, Jr. et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5060153 | Nakagawa | Oct 1991 | A |
5077607 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5175682 | Higashiyama et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177342 | Adams | Jan 1993 | A |
5206488 | Teicher | Apr 1993 | A |
5220501 | Lawlor et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231570 | Lee | Jul 1993 | A |
5247575 | Sprague et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253341 | Rozmanith et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5291550 | Levy et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305195 | Murphy | Apr 1994 | A |
5311594 | Penzias | May 1994 | A |
5321751 | Ray et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5335265 | Cooper et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336870 | Hughes et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341429 | Stringer et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347632 | Filepp et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351186 | Bullock et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351293 | Michener et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351296 | Sullivan | Sep 1994 | A |
5377269 | Heptig et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383113 | Kight et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386104 | Sime | Jan 1995 | A |
5398300 | Levey | Mar 1995 | A |
5414833 | Hershey et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420405 | Chasek | May 1995 | A |
5471627 | Means et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475585 | Bush | Dec 1995 | A |
5479574 | Glier et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5491817 | Gopal et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500513 | Langhans et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5511122 | Atkinson | Apr 1996 | A |
5515307 | Aiello et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530438 | Bickham et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5557518 | Rosen | Sep 1996 | A |
5590197 | Chen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596642 | Davis et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596643 | Davis et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5604802 | Holloway | Feb 1997 | A |
5608801 | Aiello et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5621797 | Rosen | Apr 1997 | A |
5623547 | Jones et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627972 | Shear | May 1997 | A |
5629982 | Micali | May 1997 | A |
5642419 | Rosen | Jun 1997 | A |
5671280 | Rosen | Sep 1997 | A |
5696907 | Tom | Dec 1997 | A |
5696909 | Wallner | Dec 1997 | A |
5701398 | Glier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703949 | Rosen | Dec 1997 | A |
5708422 | Blonder et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710887 | Chelliah et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724424 | Gifford | Mar 1998 | A |
5729594 | Klingman | Mar 1998 | A |
5732400 | Mandler | Mar 1998 | A |
5745654 | Titan | Apr 1998 | A |
5757917 | Rose et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758327 | Gardner et al. | May 1998 | A |
5790645 | Fawcett et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802497 | Manasse | Sep 1998 | A |
5805686 | Moller et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809144 | Sirbu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812668 | Weber | Sep 1998 | A |
5815657 | Williams et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819226 | Gopinathan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822737 | Ogram | Oct 1998 | A |
5826245 | Sandberg-Diment | Oct 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5870473 | Boesch et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875236 | Jankowitz et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878139 | Rosen | Mar 1999 | A |
5878337 | Joao et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884289 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897621 | Boesch et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899980 | Wilf et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905736 | Ronen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5970469 | Scroggie et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5988497 | Wallace | Nov 1999 | A |
6000608 | Dorf | Dec 1999 | A |
6029154 | Pettitt | Feb 2000 | A |
6094643 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6163604 | Baulier et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6330546 | Gopinathan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363488 | Ginter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389402 | Ginter et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6430539 | Lazarus et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
20010029496 | Otto et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9631043 | Oct 1996 | WO |