This application claims the priority benefit of China application serial no. 202011245559.2, filed on Nov. 10, 2020. The entirety of the above-mentioned patent application is hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this specification.
The disclosure relates to the technical field of fault diagnosis of power electronic equipment, and more specifically relates to a method and a system for diagnosing an open-circuit fault of a power switching device of a three-phase three-level rectifier.
Compared with the traditional two-level converter, the three-level converter is widely applied to high-voltage high-power scenarios due to advantages such as higher efficiency and lower current harmonics. However, since the three-level converter has more power switching devices that work in the high-frequency switching state for a long time, the three-level converter is one of the most failure-prone component in the converter. For the open-circuit fault of the power switching device, fault-tolerant control may enable the converter system to maintain higher performance and continuous operation. The fault diagnosis is a necessary condition to implement fault-tolerant control. Since different fault-tolerant control strategies need to be adopted for different faulty switches, when the power switching device of the converter has an open-circuit fault, accurately and quickly identifying and locating the fault is an important measure to improve the reliability of the converter.
At present, the research on the open-circuit fault diagnosis of the power switching device of the three-level rectifier mainly focuses on the signal-based method, the model-based method, and the artificial intelligence-based method. The signal-based method performs simple calculation and analysis on measurable signals before and after the fault to implement fault location, and may be divided into the current method and the voltage method according to the type of signals. The current method includes the Parker's current vector angle method, the normalized average current method, and the current zero zone method. The principles of the methods are simple, but the diagnosis speed is slower, and the dependence on the load is strong. The diagnosis speed of the voltage method has been improved, but an additional sensor or measuring circuit is usually required to measure the voltage, and the cost of diagnosis is higher. The model-based method establishes a mathematical model to calculate signals and implements fault diagnosis through analyzing residuals between predicted signals and actual signals. Therefore, no additional hardware is required, and the diagnosis speed is faster, but the diagnosis speed and the robustness still need to be improved. The knowledge-based method mainly adopts theories such as the wavelet transform, the neural network, and the support vector machine to perform signal processing and fault classification on voltage and current signals in the circuit to implement the accurate location of the faulty switching device. Such method generally has intensive calculation and slower diagnosis speed.
Therefore, it is of great significance to research on the method for diagnosing the open-circuit fault of the power switching device of the three-phase three-level rectifier to improve the speed, the applicability, the robustness, etc. of the diagnosis method.
In view of the above defects or improvement requirements of the prior art, the disclosure proposes a method and a system for diagnosing an open-circuit fault of a power switching device of a three-phase three-level rectifier, which can implement quick, low-cost, high-robustness identification and location the open-circuit faults of all power switching devices in the three-level rectifier.
In order to achieve the above objective, according to one aspect of the disclosure, the method for diagnosing the open-circuit fault of the power switching device of the three-phase three-level rectifier is provided, which includes the following steps.
(1) An expected value VXY*(k) of a phase-to-phase voltage between an X-phase and a Y-phase of a rectifier k at a current time and an actual value VXY(k) of the phase-to-phase voltage are selected. A deviation ΔVXY(k) between the two is used as a diagnosis variable, where XY=AB, BC, CA.
(2) Voltage current information required for diagnosis is obtained from a control system of the rectifier. The diagnosis variable ΔVXY(k) is calculated by adopting a screening technique.
(3) According to fault characteristics of faulty switches at different times, fault sections are classified. A diagnosis threshold THXY(k) at the current time is updated for a current fault section.
(4) Whether the diagnosis variable exceeds a threshold range and a polarity thereof are judged according to the diagnosis variable ΔVXY(k) and the diagnosis threshold THXY(k).
(5) A fault of an internal switching transistor is identified and located according to the above judgment result.
(6) A diagnosis result of the fault is checked to verify whether the diagnosis result is correct, and the diagnosis result of a fault of an external switching transistor that may be misdiagnosed as the fault of the internal switching transistor is corrected to implement identification and location of an external switching fault.
In some alternative embodiments, the expected value VXY*(k) of the phase-to-phase voltage is obtained from VXY*(k)=½VDC(k)(SX(k)−SY(k)), and the actual value VXY(k) of the phase-to-phase voltage is obtained from
where VDC(k) is a direct current side voltage of the rectifier at the current time; SX(k) and SY(k) are respectively switching control signals of the X-phase and the Y-phase of the rectifier, SX(k)=1 represents that switches SX1 and SX2 are turned on and switches SX3 and SX4 are turned off, SX(k)=0 represents that the switches SX2 and SX3 are turned on and the switches SX1 and SX4 are turned off, and SX(k)=1 represents that the switches SX3 and SX4 are turned on and the switches SX1 and SX2 are turned off; EX(k) and EY(k) are respectively alternating current side voltages of the X-phase and the Y-phase of the rectifier; IX(k) and IY(k) are respectively alternating current side currents of the X-phase and the Y-phase of the rectifier; R is an alternating current side equivalent resistance of the rectifier; L is an alternating current side inductance of the rectifier; T is a sampling interval time, k represents a sampling point at the current time, and k−1 represents a sampling point at a previous time.
In some alternative embodiments, Step (2) includes the following.
If there is no switching of three-phase switching control signals between sampling points k and k−1, that is, when SA(k)=SA(k−1), SB(k)=SB(k−1), and SC(k)=SC(k−1) are satisfied, ΔVXY(k)=VXY*(k) VXY(k); and if one of SA(k)=SA(k−1), SB(k)=SB(k−1), and SC(k)=SC(k−1) is not satisfied, ΔVXY(k) is not calculated, and ΔVXY(k) at the current time is regarded as zero.
In some alternative embodiments, Step (3) includes the following.
For the fault diagnosis of the internal switching transistor, the fault sections are divided into a current zero zone and a current non-zero zone. Different thresholds are set for different sections:
where V is a preset value, which is a relatively small constant; IXY(k)=0 represents that IX or IY is in the current zero zone, IXY(k)=1 represents that IX and IY are both in the current non-zero zone, and VDC(k) is a direct current side voltage of the rectifier at the current time.
For the definition of the current zero zone and the current non-zero zone, considering noise and fluctuations of current, the following definition is provided: IXY(k)=
where ITH is a current threshold.
In some alternative embodiments, Step (4) includes the following.
A variable FXY(k) indicating whether the diagnosis variable exceeds a threshold range [−THXY(k), THXY(k)] and the polarity thereof is obtained from FXY(k)=
In some alternative embodiments, Step (5) includes the following.
A corresponding relationship between the fault of the internal switching transistor and the variable FXY(k) is as follows.
When SA2 is faulty, FAB=1, FBC=0, FCA=−1;
When SA3 is faulty, FAB=−1, FBC=0, FCA=1;
When SB2 is faulty, FAB=−1, FBC=1, FCA=0;
When SB3 is faulty, FAB=1, FBC=−1, FCA=0;
When SC2 is faulty, FAB=0, FBC=−1, FCA=1;
When SC3 is faulty, FAB=0, FBC=1, FCA=−1.
In some alternative embodiments, Step (6) includes the following.
During a preset current cycle after completing the fault diagnosis, if at least one value of three diagnosis variables ΔVAB(k), ΔVBC(k), and ΔVCA(k) is greater than a threshold TH(k) at a certain time, the diagnosis result is correct and is represented by Fcheck=1. Conversely, during the preset current cycle after completing the fault diagnosis, if values of all sampling points of ΔVAB(k), ΔVBC(k), and ΔVC A(k) all do not exceed the threshold T H (0, the diagnosis result is wrong and is represented by Fcheck=0, where the threshold TH(k) is set to VDC(k)/2+V.
In some optional implementations, when Fcheck=0, a corresponding relationship between the diagnosis result, Fcheck, and the checking result is as follows.
According to another aspect of the disclosure, a system for diagnosing an open-circuit fault of a power switching device of a three-phase three-level rectifier is provided, which includes the following.
A diagnosis variable determination module is configured to select an expected value VXY*(k) of a phase-to-phase voltage between an X-phase and a Y-phase of a rectifier k at a current time and an actual value VXY(k) of the phase-to-phase voltage, and use a deviation ΔVXY(k) between the two is as a diagnosis variable, where XY=AB, BC, CA.
A diagnosis variable calculation module is configured to obtain voltage current information required for diagnosis from a control system of the rectifier, and calculate the diagnosis variable ΔVXY(k) by adopting a screening technique.
A diagnosis threshold determination module is configured to classify fault sections according to fault characteristics of faulty switches at different times, and update a diagnosis threshold THXY(k) at the current time for a current fault section.
A polarity determination module is configured to judge whether the diagnosis variable exceeds a threshold range and a polarity thereof according to the diagnosis variable ΔVXY(k) and the diagnosis threshold THXY(k).
A diagnosis module is configured to identify and locate a fault of an internal switching transistor according to the above judgment result.
A correction module is configured to check a diagnosis result of the fault to verify whether the diagnosis result is correct, and correct the diagnosis result of a fault of an external switching transistor that may be misdiagnosed as the fault of the internal switching transistor to implement identification and location of an external switching fault.
According to another aspect of the disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium stored with a computer program is provided. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method are implemented.
Generally speaking, compared with the prior art, the above technical solutions conceived by the disclosure can achieve the following beneficial effects.
(1) Through Step (6), the disclosure adopts a diagnosis result checking method to implement quick identification and location of the open-circuit faults of all power switching devices in the three-phase three-level rectifier.
(2) Through Step (2), the disclosure adopts a screening calculation method to calculate the deviation of the phase-to-phase voltage, which reduces the calculation error and improves the accuracy of diagnosis.
(3) The disclosure only needs the existing voltage current signals in the control system of the rectifier, so no additional hardware is required and low-cost fault diagnosis can be implemented.
(4) Through Step (3), the disclosure adopts a sectioned real-time update of the threshold, which not only improves the diagnosis speed, but also ensures higher robustness.
In order for the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the disclosure to be clearer, the following further describes the disclosure in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described here are only used to explain the disclosure, but not to limit the disclosure. In addition, the technical features involved in the various embodiments of the disclosure described below may be combined with each other as long as there is no conflict therebetween.
In Step S1, information required for diagnosis is obtained from a control system of a rectifier.
Alternating current side three-phase voltages (EA(k), EB(k), EC(k)), three-phase currents (IA(k), IB(k), IC(k)), and a direct current side voltage (VDC(k)) obtained by the three-phase three-level rectifier through sampling are sent to the control system. According to information such as the above signals and the stored alternating current side inductance (L) and equivalent resistance (R), the control system obtains control signals (SA(k), SB(k), SC(k)) of each phase power switching device through calculation and sends the same to the rectifier, so that the rectifier runs according to a control target. Therefore, the control system has all the information required for diagnosis. The information is used to calculate a diagnosis variable and update a threshold.
For an X-phase of the rectifier, X=A, B, C, four power switching transistors thereof are classified into two outer switching transistors SX1 and SX4 and two inner switching transistors SX2 and SX3. Therefore, the rectifier consists of six outer switching transistors and six inner switching transistors in total.
In Step S2, a deviation of a phase-to-phase voltage is calculated.
Taking an AB phase-to-phase voltage as an example, an expected value VAB*(k) of the AB phase-to-phase voltage is:
VAB*(k)=½VDC(k)(SA(k)−SB(k)),
where k represents a k-th sampling.
An actual value VAB(k) of the AB phase-to-phase voltage is:
where T is a sampling interval time.
For a deviation ΔVAB(k) of the AB phase-to-phase voltage, when conditions SA(k)=SA(k−1), SB(k)=SB(k−1), and SC(k)=SC(k−1) are satisfied, ΔVAB(k)=VAB*(k)−VAB(k); and when one of the conditions SA(k)=SA(k−1), SB(k)=SB(k−1), and SC(k)=SC(k−1) is not satisfied, ΔVAB(k)=0.
By analogy, a deviation ΔVBC(k) of a BC phase-to-phase voltage and a deviation ΔVCA(k) of a CA phase-to-phase voltage are calculated.
In Step S3, fault sections are determined and the threshold is updated in real time.
In Step S3, fault characteristics of different faulty switches at different times are analyzed. If errors are not considered, when the rectifier is working normally, three diagnosis variables ΔVAB(k), ΔVBC(k), and ΔVCA(k) are all zero; and when an open-circuit fault of a switch occurs, the diagnosis variables have different values according to different faulty switches, currents, and switching control signals, as shown in Table 1 below.
For the fault diagnosis of the internal switching transistor, the specific method for determining the threshold is as follows.
Taking the AB phase as an example, a current zero zone and a current non-zero zone are determined.
where IAB(k)=0 represents IA or IB is in the current zero zone, IAB(k)=1 represents that IA or IB are both in the current non-zero zone, ITH is a current threshold, and a current amplitude may be 5%.
By analogy, current zero zones and current non-zero zones of the BC phase and the CA phase are determined.
Taking the AB phase as an example, a main threshold is updated.
where V is a relatively small constant, which may be 2% times of VDC.
By analogy, main thresholds of the BC phase and the CA phase are updated.
The threshold required for diagnosis result checking is updated.
In Step S4, whether the diagnosis variable exceeds a main threshold range and a polarity thereof is judged.
Taking the AB phase as an example, a variable FAB(k) indicating whether ΔVAB(k) exceeds a range [−THAB(k), THAB(k)] and the polarity thereof is:
By analogy, indicating variables FBC(k) and FCA(k) of the BC phase and the CA phase are determined.
In Step S5, the fault of the internal switching transistor is identified and located.
After obtaining FAB(k), FBC(k), and FCA(k), the fault of the internal switching transistor may be located according to Table 2.
In Step S6, the diagnosis result is checked (a fault of an external switching transistor is identified and located).
After obtaining the diagnosis result of Step S5, whether ΔVAB(k), ΔVBC(k), and ΔVCA(k) are greater than the threshold TH(k) is judged. During ⅛ of a current cycle, if a value of at least one sampling point of any of the variables ΔVAB(k), ΔVBC(k), and ΔVCA(k) is greater than the threshold TH(k), the diagnosis result is correct and is represented by Fcheck=1. Conversely, during ⅛ of the current cycle, if values of all sampling points of ΔVAB(k), ΔVBC(k), and ΔVCA(k) do not exceed the threshold TH(k), the diagnosis result is wrong and is represented by Fcheck=0. When Fcheck=0, the diagnosis result is corrected to a fault of a corresponding external switching transistor, as shown in Table 3. Taking the diagnosis result of Step S5 being SA2 open-circuit fault as an example, if Fcheck=1, it represents that the diagnosis result is correct and it is SA2 open-circuit fault; and if Fcheck=0, it represents that the diagnosis result is wrong and is corrected to SA1 open-circuit fault.
In order to describe the example more clearly,
As shown in
As shown in
The above results prove that the disclosure can implement the open-circuit fault diagnosis of all power switching devices of the three-phase three-level rectifier and ensure the speed and the accuracy of the fault diagnosis of the internal switching transistor that has a greater impact on the system, and the overall diagnosis speed is faster.
The disclosure also provides a system for diagnosing an open-circuit fault of a power switching device of a three-phase three-level rectifier, which includes the following.
A diagnosis variable determination module is configured to select an expected value VXY*(k) of a phase-to-phase voltage between an X-phase and a Y-phase of a rectifier k at the current time and an actual value VXY(k) of the phase-to-phase voltage, and use a deviation ΔVXY(k) between the two is as a diagnosis variable, where XY=AB, BC, CA.
A diagnosis variable calculation module is configured to obtain voltage current information required for diagnosis from a control system of the rectifier, and calculate the diagnosis variable ΔVXY(k) by adopting a screening technique.
A diagnosis threshold determination module is configured to classify fault sections according to fault characteristics of faulty switches at different times, and update a diagnosis threshold THXY(k) at the current time for a current fault section.
A polarity determination module is configured to judge whether the diagnosis variable exceeds a threshold range and a polarity thereof according to the diagnosis variable ΔVXY(k) and the diagnosis threshold THXY(k).
A diagnosis module is configured to identify and locate a fault of an internal switching transistor according to the above judgment result.
A correction module is configured to check a diagnosis result of the fault to verify whether the diagnosis result is correct, and correct the diagnosis result of a fault of an external switching transistor that may be misdiagnosed as the fault of the internal switching transistor to implement identification and location of an external switching fault.
For the specific implementation of each module, reference may be made to the description of the foregoing embodiment of the method, which will not be repeated in the embodiment of the disclosure.
The disclosure also provides a computer-readable storage medium stored with a computer program. When the program is executed by a processor, the method for diagnosing the open-circuit fault of the power switching device of the three-phase three-level rectifier in the embodiment of the method is implemented.
It should be noted that according to implementation requirements, each step/component described in the disclosure may be split into more steps/components or two or more steps/components or partial operation of a step/component may be combined into a new step/component to implement the objective of the disclosure.
Persons skilled in the art may easily understand that the above are only preferred embodiments of the disclosure and are not intended to limit the disclosure. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc., made within the spirit and principle of the disclosure should be included in the protection scope of the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
202011245559.2 | Nov 2020 | CN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20190173384 | Kutsuki | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105158623 | Dec 2015 | CN |
111624514 | Sep 2020 | CN |
WO-2017083527 | May 2017 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220146592 A1 | May 2022 | US |