This disclosure is generally related to the field of data storage. More specifically, this disclosure is related to a high-capacity object storage system with configuration agility and mixed deployment flexibility.
Today, various storage systems are being used to store and access the ever-increasing amount of digital content. A storage system can include storage servers with one or more storage devices or drives, and a storage device or drive can include storage media with a non-volatile memory (such as a solid state drive (SSD) or a hard disk drive (HDD)). An object storage system manages stored data as objects, rather than as files or blocks. As the amount of digital content increases, so increases the demand on object storage in terms of high availability, high capacity, and high performance. In order to deploy an object storage system on a worldwide scale which meets these demands, two important features to consider are cost reduction and availability consolidation.
One current storage system can include multiple just a bunch of disks or drives (JBODs) or just a bunch of flash (JBOF), where each JBOD/JBOF can include hundreds of storage drives with a PCIe/SAS fabric expansion. However, the deployment, operation, and maintenance of this current storage system may result in some constraints, which can limit the flexibility and performance of the overall storage system.
One embodiment provides a system which facilitates operation of a storage system. During operation, the system receives, by a master node, a first I/O request with associated data, wherein the master node is in communication with a first plurality of storage drives via a switch based on a network protocol, wherein the master node and the first plurality of storage drives are allowed to reside in different cabinets, and wherein a respective collection of storage drives are coupled to a converter module, which is configured to convert data between the network protocol and an I/O protocol used to access the storage drives. The system identifies, by the master node, a first collection of storage drives from the first plurality on which to execute the first I/O request. The system executes, based on a communication via the switch and a converter module associated with the first collection of storage drives, the first I/O request on the first collection of storage drives.
In some embodiments, the first I/O request is associated with a first application. The system creates a first association between the master node and the first plurality of storage drives. The system receives a second I/O request associated with a second application, wherein the first application and the second application have different resource requirements. The system detects a condition to dynamically associate the master node with a second plurality of storage drives. The system removes the first association between the master node and the first plurality of storage drives. The system creates a second association between the master node and the second plurality of storage drives.
In some embodiments, detecting the condition is based on one or more of: a difference in capacity and input/output per second (IOPS) requirements between the first application and the second application; a first predetermined threshold for dynamically associating the master node with the second or a third plurality of storage drives; a second predetermined threshold for removing or creating an association between the master node and another plurality of storage drives; an amount of power budgeted to the different cabinets and other cabinets; an average amount of a number of IOPS per Gigabyte (GB); and a design of a respective storage drive of the first or the second plurality of storage drives.
In some embodiments, the resource requirements include one or more of a capacity requirement and an input/output per second (IOPS) requirement.
In some embodiments, the network protocol is an Ethernet protocol, and the I/O protocol is a Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) protocol.
In some embodiments, the converter module includes an adaptor and a controller coupled to at least one expander. The adaptor comprises: a first integrated circuit configured, based on the network protocol, to process data received from or sent to the switch; and a second integrated circuit configured, based on the I/O protocol, to process data sent to or received from the storage drives via the controller and the at least one expander or directly via a lane.
In some embodiments, when the second integrated circuit processes data sent to or received from the storage drives via the controller and the at least one expander: the controller is a Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) controller, the expander is an SAS expander, and the storage drives are hard disk drives or solid state drives. When the second integrated circuit processes data sent to or received from the storage drives directly via the lane: the lane is a Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) lane; and the storage drives are solid state drives or optane drives.
In some embodiments, the adaptor further comprises: a data path processor; a control path processor; a network offload engine; a PCIe root complex; and an internal memory.
In some embodiments, the master node, at least one other master node, the switch, at least one other switch, the first plurality of storage drives, and the second plurality of storage drives comprise an object storage system.
In some embodiments, the storage drives are one or more of: a solid state drive; a hard disk drive; an optane drive; and a storage device with a persistent memory which can be accessed via an SAS expander or a PCIe lane.
In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the embodiments described herein are not limited to the embodiments shown, but are to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
The embodiments described herein facilitate an object storage system which provides flexibility in configuration and mixed deployment by modifying the JBOD design, Ethernet topology, and master configuration, which can efficiently enable the high-capacity drives of a JBOD.
As described above, in order to deploy an object storage system on a worldwide scale which meets the increasing demands of high-availability, high-capacity, and high-performance, two important features to consider are cost reduction and availability consolidation. One current storage system can include multiple JBODs (or JBOFs), where each JBOD can include hundreds of storage drives with a PCIe/SAS fabric expansion. However, the deployment, operation, and maintenance of this current storage system may result in some constraints. For example, for a given rack/cabinet configuration in a data center, dual access switches (ASWs) and dual master nodes may be used to achieve high availability. The master nodes may use a host bus adaptor (HBA) card to connect to the high-capacity JBODs, via, e.g., Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) cables. SAS expanders within a given JBOD can be used to further extend the SAS fabric to connect to the multiple storage drives. This cabinet configuration can result in several limitations, including: a required physical proximity of master nodes and paired JBODs based on a maximum length of the SAS cable; difficulty in repair and maintenance due to heavy reliance on on-site support; and a rigid and inflexible system configuration resulting in isolated JBODs with coarse operational granularity. An exemplary current cabinet configuration is described below in relation to
The embodiments described herein address these challenges by providing an object storage system which modifies the JBOD design, Ethernet topology, and master configuration. The system can provide configuration agility and mixed deployment flexibility, which can efficiently enable the high-capacity drives and provide improvements in the efficiency and scalability of the overall storage system. Unlike the rigid cabinet configuration in current storage systems, the embodiments described herein can decouple the master nodes from the JBODs by using a universal Ethernet connection to replace the SAS fabric of current storage systems. Thus, JBODs and master nodes from different cabinets can form the described object storage system, as described below in relation to
Moreover, the described embodiments can provide for an efficient mixed deployment, e.g., mixing varying input/outputs per second (IOPS) for different SLAs on the same drive to most efficiently utilize both the capacity and throughput of the drive, as described below in relation to
Thus, by modifying the Ethernet topology of the object storage system and by including a NIC-to-SAS board in each JBOD, the embodiments described herein can decouple the master nodes and JBODs, which can result in a more efficient and flexible configuration. Also, by providing a dynamic logical grouping of these decoupled master nodes and JBODs, the embodiments described herein can provide a significant reduction in cost due to fully and efficiently utilizing each drive of a JBOD, e.g., via a mixed deployment of applications which require different IOPS and capacity. These improvements can result in a consolidation of availability and a reduction in cost, which in turn can result in a more efficient overall storage system.
A “distributed storage system” or a “storage system” can include multiple storage servers. An “object storage system” refers to a storage system which stores data as objects. A “storage server” or a “storage system” can refer to a computing device which can include multiple storage devices or storage drives. A “storage device” or a “storage drive” refers to a device or a drive with a non-volatile memory which can provide persistent storage of data, e.g., a solid state drive (SSD), a hard disk drive (HDD), or a flash-based storage device. A storage system can also be a computer system. In this disclosure, a storage system or a computer system can include a plurality of master nodes and at least one collection of storage drives (e.g., a JBOD).
A “computing device” refers to any server, device, node, entity, or drive, including a master node, a collection of storage drives or files (JBODs/JBOFs), or any other entity which can provide any computing capabilities.
The term “master node” refers to a computing device which can receive an I/O request. In this disclosure, a master node can be coupled to or in communication with one or more switches (such as access switches), and can also be in communication with a plurality of storage drives (or a plurality of collections of storage drives, e.g., multiple JBODs/JBOFs). One or more master nodes can also be associated with a plurality of storage drives or pluralities of storage drives (e.g., collections of storage drives or JBODs/JBOFs).
The term “JBOD” refers to just a bunch or bundle of disks, and the term “JBOF” refers to just a bunch or bundle of flash. A JBOD or JBOF can be a collection of storage drives or storage devices.
The term “rack” generally refers to an open frame designed for housing or mounting electronic equipment modules or entities, including servers, storage drives, storage devices, computing devices, switches, and any other components that may communicate with or be coupled to an entity in the rack. The term “cabinet” refers to a physical structure which is similar to a rack but is generally partially or fully enclosed with sidewalls. Cabinets can also house or mount electronic equipment modules or entities similar to those listed above for racks. The terms “rack” and “cabinet” are used interchangeably in this disclosure.
The term “converter module” refers to a component or module which can be configured to convert data between a network protocol and an I/O protocol. An example of a converter module as used in this disclosure includes a “NIC-to-SAS board” and an “Ethernet-to-PCIe/SAS converter board,” as described below in relation to
Exemplary Operation of a Storage System in the Prior Art
As described above, this configuration can result in several constraints. First, in order to maintain signal integrity, the length of the SAS cable is constrained by a maximum length of 1.5 meters. Thus, a master node and its paired or associated JBODs must be placed physically close to each other in the same cabinet. This limitation can affect the overall design of the cabinet. Furthermore, the cabinet must be designed with a sufficiently high power budget to accommodate these proximally placed components/devices, which can be especially difficult to deploy in data centers with prior generations of design and components/devices.
Second, the SAS fabric system relies heavily on on-site support, creating difficulties in making repairs and performing maintenance activities/operations. If a single storage drive (out of hundreds of storage drives) in a JBOD fails, an operator (e.g., a field engineer) must take the JBOD offline, replace the defective storage drive, and then place the JBOD back online. Given the hundreds of storage drives in each JBOD and the non-trivial likelihood of hardware failure, the operator may need to spend a certain amount of time to perform these tasks. During the time that a given JBOD is offline, several Petabytes (PB) of data may not be accessible, which can result in a service interrupt. Such a service interrupt can result in an inefficient storage system, and can also affect the Quality of Service (QoS) and any service level agreements (SLAs).
Third, the configuration of the current cabinets (with the proximally close collaboration of master nodes and JBODs connected via the SAS fabric) can result a rigid online resource re-allocation, in that each system (i.e., a set of connected master nodes and JBODs) is essentially an isolated, stand-alone island. Furthermore, the operational granularity can be coarse, and due to the large amount of data stored in each system, a single fault in the system can affect a wider range, e.g., result in errors across the system. These constraints can limit the flexibility and performance of the overall storage system, and can especially affect the availability of the resources and the overall cost.
Exemplary Operation of a Storage System With Redundancy and Host-Based Mapping
The embodiments described herein provide a system which addresses the challenges described above in relation to prior art environment 100 of
For example, cabinet 210 can include: an access switch 212; an access switch 213; a master node 214 with a NIC 216; a master node 218 with a NIC 220; a JBOD/JBOF 222 with a NIC-to-SAS card 224; and a JBOD/JBOF 226 with a NIC-to-SAS card 228. Similarly, cabinet 230 can include: an access switch 232; an access switch 233; a master node 234 with a NIC 236; a master node 238 with a NIC 240; a JBOD/JBOF 242 with a NIC-to-SAS card 244; and a JBOD/JBOF 246 with a NIC-to-SAS card 248. As another example, JBOD 242 can include: a NIC-to-SAS card or board 244 (i.e., the converter module); SAS expanders 254; and drives 261-272.
In environment 200, the master nodes can communicate with a plurality of storage drives, which can include a collection (a single JBOD) of storage drives or collections (multiple JBODs) of storages drives. For example, master node 214 (which resides in cabinet 210) can be in communication with JBODs 222 and 226 (of the same cabinet 210) via access switches 212 and 213. Furthermore, master node 214 can be in communication with JBODs 242 and 246 of cabinet 230 via access switches 212 and 213 and via access switches 232 and 233 of cabinet 230. That is, a master node can be in communication with any plurality of storage drives in environment 200, where the master node and the plurality of storage drives are allowed to reside in different cabinets.
In addition, a master node can be associated with a plurality of storage drives, including a plurality of collections of storage drives, e.g., multiple JBODs. The master node and its associated JBODs can be allowed to reside in different cabinets. For example, master node 214 can be associated with JBOD 222 (which resides in the same cabinet 210 as master node 214) and JBOD 246 (which resides in a different cabinet 230 as master node 214).
Furthermore, a pair or plurality of master nodes can be associated with pluralities of storage drives, where each of the master nodes and pluralities of storage drives are allowed to reside in different cabinets. In
Thus, by decoupling the master nodes from the JBODs, the embodiments described herein allow an object storage system to provide logical groupings of associated masters and JBODs, by using the converter module associated with each collection of storage drives (e.g., NIC-to-SAS cards or boards 224, 228, 244, and 248) to provide communication between computing devices which reside in different cabinets (e.g., cabinets 210 and 230). An exemplary NIC-to-SAS board is described below in relation to
Exemplary Ethernet Topology and Exemplary NIC-to-SAS Board/Card
For example, each of pod switches 302, 304 and 306 can be coupled to or in communication with each of access switches 212, 213, 232, 233, and 320. Access switch 212 can be coupled to or in communication with at least master node 214, JBOD/JBOF 226, and master node 218. Access switch 213 can be coupled to or in communication with at least JBOD/JBOF 222. Access switch 232 can be coupled to or in communication with at least master node 238 and JBOD/JBOF 242. Access switch 233 can be coupled to or in communication with at least master node 234 and JBOD/JBOF 242. Access switch 320 can be coupled to or in communication with JBOD/JBOFs 322 and 326.
Note that topology 300 depicts the four associated computing devices from
During operation, board 400 can receive data from or send data to an access switch (via a from/to ASW 452 communication). In the example of receiving data, board 400 can receive data via Ethernet-PCIe adaptor 410, which can convert the data received based on an Ethernet protocol to data which can be transmitted based on a PCIe protocol. If the data is to be sent via the PCIe protocol, the system can send the data directly from Ethernet-PCIe adaptor 410 via a PCIe lane 458 to PCIe devices, e.g., an SSD or an optane drive.
The PCIe lanes can also be coupled to, connected to, or in communication with SAS controller 430, to provide an SAS output. SAS expander 432 can be used to provide a further fan-out of the storage drives (i.e., HDDs and SSDs). Thus, if the data is to be sent via an SAS fabric, the system can send the data via the PCIe lanes from Ethernet-PCIe adaptor 410 to SAS controller 430, which can perform any necessary processing on the data, and send the data to SAS expander 432. The system can send the data from SAS expander 432 to an HDD/SDD (via a communication 454) or to a device or drive coupled to, associated with, or in communication with an expander (via a communication 456).
Thus, the converter module depicted in
Mixed Deployment for Multiple SLAs and Enabling High-Capacity Drives
As described above, high-capacity drives may be used in order to achieve a reduction in cost. However, while high-capacity drives can result in a proportional decrease in the IOPS/GB (e.g., as SSDs/HDDs evolve with greater capacity), the overall throughput may not be able to match this proportional decrease. Thus, one storage drive may handle a mixture of requests from applications which require varying IOPS in their service level agreements (SLAs). This mixture may be used to fully utilize both the capacity and the throughput of the storage drive. That is, some applications may require a high capacity but may experience a low IOPS in order to balance the decreasing IOPS/GB on average. Based on the differing design of various storage drives (and storage products), this can result in a change in the ratio of master nodes versus storage drives.
In the embodiments described herein, the system can provide this mixed deployment by storing data in a storage drive or collection of storage drives (e.g., a JBOD) based on requirements or resource requirements of different applications. That is, the decoupled and logically grouped master nodes and storage drives can be dynamically grouped or associated based on the current demands to obtain an improved efficiency in resource allocation, which can in turn result in a more efficient overall storage system. The agility and flexibility of this dynamic reconfiguration can thus more efficiently and effectively utilize the capacity of today's high-density storage drives by concurrently serving multiple applications with different requirements (e.g., capacity requirements, IOPS requirements, and other requirements which may be associated with an SLA).
For example, master nodes 530 and 532 can be in communication and associated with JBODs/JBOFs 520, 522, and 524, as indicated by the solid lines with double-sided arrows from these computing entities to Ethernet 510. Each JBOD can include a mixed deployment of data, i.e., data from applications with different resource requirements. As an example, JBOD/JBOF 522 is depicted as storing three different service types of data: service type 1540 data (depicted with right-slanting diagonal lines); service type 2542 (depicted with no pattern); and service type 3544 (depicted with left-slanting diagonal lines).
Furthermore, during operation, the system can determine or detect a condition to dynamically associate a master node (or master nodes) with a different plurality of storage drives, as indicated by the dashed lines with double-sided arrows from master nodes 534, 536, 538, and 540 to Ethernet 510. This condition can be based on, e.g.: a difference in capacity and input/output per second (IOPS) requirements between two different requesting applications on a same master node or storage drive; a first predetermined threshold for dynamically associating the master node with another plurality of storage drives; a second predetermined threshold for removing or creating an association between the master node and another plurality of storage drives; an amount of power budgeted to one or more racks/cabinets, e.g., in a data center; an average amount of a number of IOPS per Gigabyte (GB); and a design of a respective storage drive of a plurality of storage drives.
As a result, the embodiments of the object storage system described herein can be deployed in an older or prior generation data center, which may include racks/cabinets with a relatively low power budget which is not sufficient to support the newer high-density storage drives in a current object storage system. Thus, by decoupling the master nodes and the storage drives via a converter module associated with or coupled to each collection of storage drives, and providing a dynamic logical grouping of these decoupled master and storage drives, the embodiments described herein can provide a more flexible configuration of entities in an object storage system, an efficient mixed deployment of applications with different resource requirements, and deployment in scenarios which can handle power budget constraints (i.e., data centers with older equipment).
Method for Facilitating Operation of a Storage System
The second association may be considered a “re-association,” in that the system re-associates the master node with a plurality of storage drives other than the first plurality of storage drives. Furthermore, the detected condition to dynamically associate the master node with the second (or other) plurality of storage drives (e.g., to re-associate the master node or master nodes) can be based on, e.g.: a capacity requirement; an IOPS requirement; a predetermined threshold for dynamically associating the master node with the second or a third plurality of storage drives; a second predetermined threshold for removing or creating an association between the master node and another plurality of storage drives; an amount of power budgeted to one or more racks/cabinets in a data center; an average amount of a number of IOPS per GB; and a design of a respective storage drive or other storage product deployed in the JBODs/JBOFs.
Thus, the embodiments described herein provide a high-capacity object storage system with configuration agility and mixed deployment flexibility, by coupling a converter module to each collection or plurality of storage drives (i.e., a JBOD), thus allowing the JBOD to communicate directly with an Ethernet access switch. Furthermore, by dynamically allocating the logical grouping of masters with JBODs, the system can increase or decrease the number of masters associated with any number of JBODs, e.g., if the I/O requests to be executed by a certain plurality of storage drives require more computing power.
Exemplary Computer System and Apparatus
Content-processing system 718 can include instructions, which when executed by computer system 700, can cause computer system 700 or processor 702 to perform methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, content-processing system 718 can include instructions for receiving and transmitting data packets, including data to be read or written and an input/output (I/O) request (e.g., a read request or a write request) (communication module 720).
Content-processing system 718 can further include instructions for receiving, by a master node, a first I/O request with associated data, wherein the master node is in communication with a first plurality of storage drives via a switch based on a network protocol, wherein the master node and the first plurality of storage drives are allowed to reside in different cabinets, and wherein a respective collection of storage drives are coupled to a converter module, which is configured to convert data between the network protocol and an I/O protocol used to access the storage drives (communication module 720). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for identifying, by the master node, a first collection of storage drives from the first plurality on which to execute the first I/O request (drive-identifying module 724). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for executing, based on a communication via the switch and a converter module associated with the first collection of storage drives, the first I/O request on the first collection of storage drives (I/O-executing module 726).
Content-processing system 718 can additionally include instructions for creating a first association between the master node and the first plurality of storage drives (master and drives-associating module 722). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for receiving a second I/O request associated with a second application, wherein the first application and the second application have different resource requirements (communication module 720). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for detecting a condition to dynamically associate the master node with a second plurality of storage drives (condition-detecting module 728). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for removing the first association between the master node and the first plurality of storage drives (master and drives-associating module 722). Content-processing system 718 can include instructions for creating a second association between the master node and the second plurality of storage drives (master and drives-associating module 722).
Content-processing system 718 can also include instructions for converting data between a network protocol and an I/O protocol, and for performing the operations described above by Ethernet-PCIe adaptor 410 and Ethernet-to-PCIe/SAS converter board 400 of
Data 732 can include any data that is required as input or generated as output by the methods and/or processes described in this disclosure. Specifically, data 732 can store at least: data; a request; a read request; a write request; an input/output (I/O) request; data associated with a read request, a write request, or an I/O request; a logical block address (LBA); a physical block address (PBA); an indicator or identifier of a storage drive; an indicator of a plurality or collection of storage drives; a condition; an association between a master node and a plurality of storage drives; a dynamic association between a master node and a plurality of storage drives; a difference in capacity and input/output per second (IOPS) requirements between the first application and the second application; a predetermined threshold for dynamically associating or re-associating the master node with another plurality of storage drives; an amount of power budgeted to a cabinet(s); a number of IOPS; a number of GB; an average amount of a number of IOPS per GB; a design of a storage drive; a resource requirement; a capacity requirement; an IOPS requirement; information relating to an Ethernet protocol or a PCIe protocol; functionality or configuration of an integrated circuit; an indicator of an adaptor, a data path processor, a control path processor, a network offload engine, a PCIe root complex, and an internal memory; an indicator or identifier of an Ethernet-to-PCIe/SAS converter board, card, module, or unit; and an indicator or identifier of a master node, a switch, an SSD, an HDD, an optane drive, or an object storage system.
The data structures and code described in this detailed description are typically stored on a computer-readable storage medium, which may be any device or medium that can store code and/or data for use by a computer system. The computer-readable storage medium includes, but is not limited to, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, magnetic and optical storage devices such as disk drives, magnetic tape, CDs (compact discs), DVDs (digital versatile discs or digital video discs), or other media capable of storing computer-readable media now known or later developed.
The methods and processes described in the detailed description section can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium as described above. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the computer-readable storage medium.
Furthermore, the methods and processes described above can be included in hardware modules. For example, the hardware modules can include, but are not limited to, application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules are activated, the hardware modules perform the methods and processes included within the hardware modules.
The foregoing embodiments described herein have been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments described herein to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the embodiments described herein. The scope of the embodiments described herein is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3893071 | Bossen | Jul 1975 | A |
4562494 | Bond | Dec 1985 | A |
4718067 | Peters | Jan 1988 | A |
4775932 | Oxley | Oct 1988 | A |
4858040 | Hazebrouck | Aug 1989 | A |
5394382 | Hu | Feb 1995 | A |
5602693 | Brunnett | Feb 1997 | A |
5715471 | Otsuka | Feb 1998 | A |
5732093 | Huang | Mar 1998 | A |
5802551 | Komatsu | Sep 1998 | A |
5930167 | Lee | Jul 1999 | A |
6098185 | Wilson | Aug 2000 | A |
6148377 | Carter | Nov 2000 | A |
6226650 | Mahajan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243795 | Yang | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6457104 | Tremaine | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6658478 | Singhal | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6795894 | Neufeld | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7351072 | Muff | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7565454 | Zuberi | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7599139 | Bombet | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7953899 | Hooper | May 2011 | B1 |
7958433 | Yoon | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8085569 | Kim | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8144512 | Huang | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8166233 | Schibilla | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8260924 | Koretz | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8281061 | Radke | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8452819 | Sorenson, III | May 2013 | B1 |
8516284 | Chan | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527544 | Colgrove | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8751763 | Ramarao | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8819367 | Fallone | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8825937 | Atkisson | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8832688 | Tang | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8868825 | Hayes | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8904061 | O'Brien, III | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8949208 | Xu | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9015561 | Hu | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9031296 | Kaempfer | May 2015 | B2 |
9043545 | Kimmel | May 2015 | B2 |
9088300 | Chen | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9092223 | Pani | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9129628 | Fallone | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9141176 | Chen | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9208817 | Li | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9213627 | Van Acht | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9280472 | Dang | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9280487 | Candelaria | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9311939 | Malina | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9336340 | Dong | May 2016 | B1 |
9436595 | Benitez | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9495263 | Pang | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9529601 | Dharmadhikari | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9529670 | O'Connor | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9569454 | Ebsen | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9575982 | Sankara Subramanian | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9588698 | Karamcheti | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9588977 | Wang | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9607631 | Rausch | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9671971 | Trika | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9747202 | Shaharabany | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9836232 | Vasquez | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9852076 | Garg | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9875053 | Frid | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9912530 | Singatwaria | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9923562 | Vinson | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9946596 | Hashimoto | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10013169 | Fisher | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10199066 | Feldman | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10229735 | Natarajan | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10235198 | Qiu | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10268390 | Warfield | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10318467 | Barzik | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10361722 | Lee | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10437670 | Koltsidas | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10459663 | Agombar | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10642522 | Li | May 2020 | B2 |
10649657 | Zaidman | May 2020 | B2 |
10678432 | Dreier | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10756816 | Dreier | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10928847 | Suresh | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10990526 | Lam | Apr 2021 | B1 |
20010032324 | Slaughter | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010046295 | Sako | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010783 | Primak | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020039260 | Kilmer | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020073358 | Atkinson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095403 | Chandrasekaran | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112085 | Berg | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020161890 | Chen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030074319 | Jaquette | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030145274 | Hwang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163594 | Aasheim | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163633 | Aasheim | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030217080 | White | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040010545 | Pandya | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040066741 | Dinker | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103238 | Avraham | May 2004 | A1 |
20040143718 | Chen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040255171 | Zimmer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267752 | Wong | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268278 | Hoberman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038954 | Saliba | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050097126 | Cabrera | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138325 | Hofstee | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144358 | Conley | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149827 | Lambert | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174670 | Dunn | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177672 | Rao | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177755 | Fung | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195635 | Conley | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235067 | Creta | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235171 | Igari | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060031709 | Hiraiwa | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060101197 | Georgis | May 2006 | A1 |
20060156009 | Shin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156012 | Beeson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184813 | Bui | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070033323 | Gorobets | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061502 | Lasser | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070101096 | Gorobets | May 2007 | A1 |
20070250756 | Gower | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266011 | Rohrs | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283081 | Lasser | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283104 | Wellwood | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070285980 | Shimizu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080028223 | Rhoads | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034154 | Lee | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065805 | Wu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082731 | Karamcheti | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112238 | Kim | May 2008 | A1 |
20080163033 | Yim | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195829 | Wilsey | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080301532 | Uchikawa | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006667 | Lin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090089544 | Liu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113219 | Aharonov | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125788 | Wheeler | May 2009 | A1 |
20090183052 | Kanno | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090254705 | Abali | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282275 | Yermalayeu | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287956 | Flynn | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307249 | Koifman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307426 | Galloway | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310412 | Jang | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100031000 | Flynn | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100169470 | Takashige | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217952 | Iyer | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100229224 | Etchegoyen | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241848 | Smith | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281254 | Carro | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100321999 | Yoo | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325367 | Kornegay | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332922 | Chang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110031546 | Uenaka | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055458 | Kuehne | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055471 | Thatcher | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060722 | Li | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072204 | Chang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110099418 | Chen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110153903 | Hinkle | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161784 | Selinger | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110191525 | Hsu | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110218969 | Anglin | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231598 | Hatsuda | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239083 | Kanno | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110252188 | Weingarten | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258514 | Lasser | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110289263 | McWilliams | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289280 | Koseki | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292538 | Haga | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296411 | Tang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299317 | Shaeffer | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302353 | Confalonieri | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302408 | McDermott | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017037 | Riddle | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120039117 | Webb | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120084523 | Littlefield | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089774 | Kelkar | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096330 | Przybylski | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120117399 | Chan | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147021 | Cheng | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151253 | Horn | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159099 | Lindamood | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159289 | Piccirillo | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173792 | Lassa | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203958 | Jones | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210095 | Nellans | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233523 | Krishnamoorthy | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246392 | Cheon | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120278579 | Goss | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284435 | Myrah | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284587 | Yu | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297100 | Du | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120324312 | Moyer | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331207 | Lassa | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013880 | Tashiro | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016970 | Koka | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018852 | Barton | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130024605 | Sharon | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130054822 | Mordani | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054932 | Acharya | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130061029 | Huff | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073798 | Kang | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080391 | Raichstein | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130111094 | Culter | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138871 | Chiu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145085 | Yu | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145089 | Eleftheriou | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151759 | Shim | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159251 | Skrenta | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159723 | Brandt | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166820 | Batwara | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173845 | Aslam | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179898 | Fang | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191601 | Peterson | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130205183 | Fillingim | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219131 | Alexandron | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227347 | Cho | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130238955 | D Abreu | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254622 | Kanno | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130318283 | Small | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318395 | Kalavade | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130329492 | Yang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006688 | Yu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019650 | Li | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025638 | Hu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140082273 | Segev | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082412 | Matsumura | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095769 | Borkenhagen | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140095827 | Wei | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108414 | Stillerman | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108891 | Strasser | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140164447 | Tarafdar | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164879 | Tam | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181532 | Camp | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140195564 | Talagala | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215129 | Kuzmin | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140223079 | Zhang | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140233950 | Luo | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140250259 | Ke | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279927 | Constantinescu | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140304452 | De La Iglesia | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310574 | Yu | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140359229 | Cota-Robles | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140365707 | Talagala | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379965 | Gole | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150006792 | Lee | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019798 | Huang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039849 | Lewis | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150082317 | You | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150106556 | Yu | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106559 | Cho | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150121031 | Feng | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150142752 | Chennamsetty | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143030 | Gorobets | May 2015 | A1 |
20150186657 | Nakhjiri | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199234 | Choi | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150227316 | Warfield | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150234845 | Moore | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150269964 | Fallone | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150277937 | Swanson | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150286477 | Mathur | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294684 | Qjang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150301964 | Brinicombe | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304108 | Obukhov | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310916 | Leem | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150317095 | Voigt | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150341123 | Nagarajan | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150347025 | Law | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363271 | Haustein | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363328 | Candelaria | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150372597 | Luo | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160014039 | Reddy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026575 | Samanta | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160041760 | Kuang | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160048327 | Nuwan | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160048341 | Constantinescu | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054922 | Awasthi | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160062885 | Ryu | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160077749 | Ravimohan | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160077764 | Ori | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160077968 | Sela | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160098344 | Gorobets | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160098350 | Tang | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160103631 | Ke | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160110254 | Cronie | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160124742 | Rangasamy | May 2016 | A1 |
20160132237 | Jeong | May 2016 | A1 |
20160141047 | Sehgal | May 2016 | A1 |
20160154601 | Chen | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160155750 | Yasuda | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160162187 | Lee | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160179399 | Melik-Martirosian | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160188223 | Camp | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160188890 | Naeimi | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160203000 | Parmar | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160224267 | Yang | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160232103 | Schmisseur | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160234297 | Ambach | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160239074 | Lee | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160239380 | Wideman | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160274636 | Kim | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160306699 | Resch | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306853 | Sabaa | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160321002 | Jung | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335085 | Scalabrino | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160342345 | Kankani | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160343429 | Nieuwejaar | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160350002 | Vergis | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160350385 | Poder | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160364146 | Kuttner | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381442 | Heanue | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170004037 | Park | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170010652 | Huang | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170075583 | Alexander | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170075594 | Badam | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170091110 | Ash | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170109199 | Chen | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170109232 | Cha | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170123655 | Sinclair | May 2017 | A1 |
20170147499 | Mohan | May 2017 | A1 |
20170161202 | Erez | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170162235 | De | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170168986 | Sajeepa | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177217 | Kanno | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177259 | Motwani | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170185498 | Gao | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170192848 | Pamies-Juarez | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170199823 | Hayes | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170212708 | Suhas | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170220254 | Warfield | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170221519 | Matsuo | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170228157 | Yang | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242722 | Qiu | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170249162 | Tsirkin | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170262176 | Kanno | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262178 | Hashimoto | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262217 | Pradhan | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170269998 | Jung | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170279460 | Camp | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170285976 | Durham | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170286311 | Juenemann | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170322888 | Booth | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170344470 | Yang | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170344491 | Pandurangan | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170353576 | Guim Bernat | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180024772 | Madraswala | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180024779 | Kojima | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033491 | Marelli | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180052797 | Barzik | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180067847 | Oh | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180069658 | Benisty | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180074730 | Inoue | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180076828 | Kanno | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180088867 | Kaminaga | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180107591 | Smith | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180113631 | Zhang | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180131633 | Li | May 2018 | A1 |
20180143780 | Cho | May 2018 | A1 |
20180150640 | Li | May 2018 | A1 |
20180165038 | Authement | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180165169 | Camp | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180165340 | Agarwal | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180167268 | Liguori | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180173620 | Cen | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180188970 | Liu | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180189175 | Ji | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180189182 | Wang | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212951 | Goodrum | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219561 | Litsyn | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180226124 | Perner | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180232151 | Badam | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180260148 | Klein | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180270110 | Chugtu | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180293014 | Ravimohan | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180300203 | Kathpal | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180321864 | Benisty | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180322024 | Nagao | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180329776 | Lai | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180336921 | Ryun | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349396 | Blagojevic | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180356992 | Lamberts | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180357126 | Dhuse | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373428 | Kan | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373655 | Liu | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373664 | Vijayrao | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190012111 | Li | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190050327 | Li | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190065085 | Jean | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190073261 | Halbert | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190073262 | Chen | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190087089 | Yoshida | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190087115 | Li | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190087328 | Kanno | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190116127 | Pismenny | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190171532 | Abadi | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190172820 | Meyers | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190196748 | Badam | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190196907 | Khan | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190205206 | Hornung | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190212949 | Pletka | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190220392 | Lin | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190227927 | Miao | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190272242 | Kachare | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190278654 | Kaynak | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190317901 | Kachare | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190339998 | Momchilov | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190377632 | Oh | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190377821 | Pleshachkov | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190391748 | Li | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200004456 | Williams | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200004674 | Williams | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013458 | Schreck | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200042223 | Li | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200042387 | Shani | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200089430 | Kanno | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200097189 | Tao | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200143885 | Kim | May 2020 | A1 |
20200159425 | Flynn | May 2020 | A1 |
20200167091 | Haridas | May 2020 | A1 |
20200210309 | Jung | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200218449 | Leitao | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200225875 | Oh | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200242021 | Gholamipour | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200250032 | Goyal | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200257598 | Yazovitsky | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200326855 | Wu | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328192 | Zaman | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200348888 | Kim | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200387327 | Hsieh | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200401334 | Saxena | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200409791 | Devriendt | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210010338 | Santos | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210089392 | Shirakawa | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210103388 | Choi | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210191635 | Hu | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210286555 | Li | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003022209 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2011175422 | Sep 2011 | JP |
9418634 | Aug 1994 | WO |
1994018634 | Aug 1994 | WO |
Entry |
---|
https://web.archive.org/web/20071130235034/http://en.wikipedia.org:80/wiki/logical_block_addressing Wikipedia screen shot retriefed on wayback Nov. 20, 2007 showing both physical and logical addressing used historically to access data on storage devices (Year: 2007). |
Ivan Picoli, Carla Pasco, Bjorn Jonsson, Luc Bouganim, Philippe Bonnet. “uFLIP-OC: Understanding Flash I/O Patterns on Open-Channel Solid-State Drives.” APSys'17, Sep. 2017, Mumbai, India, pp. 1-7, 2017, <10.1145/3124680.3124741>. <hal-01654985>. |
EMC Powerpath Load Balancing and Failover Comparison with native MPIO operating system solutions. Feb. 2011. |
Tsuchiya, Yoshihiro et al. “DBLK: Deduplication for Primary Block Storage”, MSST 2011, Denver, CO, May 23-27, 2011 pp. 1-5. |
Chen Feng, et al. “CAFTL: A Content-Aware Flash Translation Layer Enhancing the Lifespan of Flash Memory based Solid State Devices”< FAST '11, San Jose, CA Feb. 15-17, 2011, pp. 1-14. |
Wu, Huijun et al. “HPDedup: A Hybrid Prioritized Data Deduplication Mechanism for Primary Storage in the Cloud”, Cornell Univ. arXiv: 1702.08153v2[cs.DC], Apr. 16, 2017, pp. 1-14. |
WOW: Wise Ordering for Writes—Combining Spatial and Temporal Locality in Non-Volatile Caches by Gill (Year: 2005). |
Helen H. W. Chan et al. “HashKV: Enabling Efficient Updated in KV Storage via Hashing”, https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc18/presentation/chan, (Year: 2018). |
S. Hong and D. Shin, “NAND Flash-Based Disk Cache Using SLC/MLC Combined Flash Memory,” 2010 International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os, Incline Village, NV, 2010, pp. 21-30. |
Arpaci-Dusseau et al. “Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces”, Originally published 2015; Pertinent: Chapter 44; flash-based SSDs, available at http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/˜remzi/OSTEP/. |
Jimenex, X., Novo, D. and P. lenne, “Pheonix:Reviving MLC Blocks as SLC to Extend NAND Flash Devices Lifetime,” Design, Automation & Text in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), 2013. |
Yang, T. Wu, H. and W. Sun, “GD-FTL: Improving the Performance and Lifetime of TLC SSD by Downgrading Worn-out Blocks,” IEEE 37th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC), 2018. |
C. Wu, D. Wu, H. Chou and C. Cheng, “Rethink the Design of Flash Translation Layers in a Component-Based View”, in IEEE Acess, vol. 5, pp. 12895-12912, 2017. |
Po-Liang Wu, Yuan-Hao Chang and T. Kuo, “A file-system-aware FTL design for flash-memory storage systems,” 2009, pp. 393-398. |
S. Choudhuri and T. Givargis, “Preformance improvement of block based NAND flash translation layer”, 2007 5th IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and Systems Synthesis (CODES+ISSS). Saizburg, 2007, pp. 257-262. |
A. Zuck, O. Kishon and S. Toledo. “LSDM: Improving the Preformance of Mobile Storage with a Log-Structured Address Remapping Device Driver”, 2014 Eighth International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Apps, Services and Technologies, Oxford, 2014, pp. 221-228. |
J. Jung and Y. Won, “nvramdisk: A Transactional Block Device Driver for Non-Volatile RAM”, in IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 589-600, Feb. 1, 2016. |
Te I et al. (Pensieve: a Machine Assisted SSD Layer for Extending the Lifetime: (Year: 2018). |
ARM (“Cortex-R5 and Cortex-R5F”, Technical reference Manual, Revision r1p1) (Year:2011). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210216487 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |