The present invention relates to technologies for use identifying the presence of a liquid product inside a receptacle. The invention has numerous applications, in particular it can be used for scanning hand carried baggage at security check points, for example but not limited to airport and train security checkpoints.
Some liquids or combinations of liquids and other compounds may cause enough damage to bring down an aircraft. As no reliable technology-based solution currently exists to adequately address this threat, authorities have implemented a ban of most liquids, gels and aerosols in cabin baggage.
As a result, there have been disruptions in operations (e.g., a longer screening process; changed the focus for screeners; additional line-ups), major inconveniences for passengers (as well as potential health hazards for some) and economic concerns (e.g., increased screening costs; lost revenues for airlines and duty free shops; large quantities of confiscated—including hazardous—merchandise to dispose of), and so on.
Clearly, there is a need to provide a technology-based solution to address the threat of fluids that are flammable, explosive or commonly used as ingredients in explosive or incendiary devices.
In accordance with a first aspect, the invention provides a method for determining if a piece of luggage contains a liquid product, the liquid product being comprised of a container holding a body of liquid. The method comprises receiving X-ray image data conveying an image of the piece of luggage and contents thereof, the X-ray image data being generated by scanning the luggage with an X-ray scanner. The method also comprises processing the X-ray image data with a computer to detect a signature of the liquid product in the X-ray image data and determine if a liquid product is present in the piece of luggage. The method also comprises releasing at an output of the computer a detection signal conveying a result obtained by processing the X-ray image data.
In accordance with a specific example of implementation, the detection signal indicates whether a liquid product has been identified in the piece of luggage. The detection signal may also include location information conveying a location in the piece of luggage where a liquid product has been identified. Optionally, the detection signal conveys confidence information indicative of a level of confidence that a portion of the X-ray image represents a liquid product.
In accordance with a specific example of implementation, processing the X-ray image data includes identifying a set of areas in the image conveyed by the X-ray image data as candidates for containing at least a portion of a liquid product. In accordance with a specific example, processing the X-ray image data may also include processing the areas in the identified set of areas based in part on a set of qualifying factors in order to derive a subset of the set of areas. The set of qualifying factors may include one or more factors such as, for example, size of area, symmetry of area, Zeff of area, edge characteristics of area, gray level of area and aspect ratio of area.
In accordance with a specific example of implementation, processing the X-ray image data includes processing the areas in the set of areas according to a set of rejection criterion in order to derive a subset of the set of areas, the set of rejection criterion allowing identifying areas in the set of areas that are unlikely to be associated to a portion of a liquid product. The set of rejection criterion includes one or more rejection criterion. Non-limiting examples of rejection criterion include, without being limited to information related to a geometry, information related to density. The set of rejection criterion may also include information conveying signatures of articles that register as false positives.
In accordance with a specific example of implementation, processing the X-ray image data includes processing the areas in the set of areas according to a set of merging criterion to determine whether some of the areas in the set of areas can be combined to form a merged area.
In accordance with a specific example of implementation, the X-ray image data is obtained using a multi-view X-ray scanner and the image of the piece of luggage and contents thereof is a first X-ray image obtained by subjecting the piece of luggage to X-rays in a first orientation. The X-ray image data conveys a second X-ray image of the piece of luggage, the second image being obtained by subjecting the luggage item to X-rays in a second orientation.
In accordance with another aspect, the invention provides a computer readable storage medium storing a program element suitable for execution by a computing apparatus for determining if a piece of luggage contains a liquid product in accordance with the above described method.
In accordance with another broad aspect, the invention provides an apparatus suitable for determining if a piece of luggage contains a liquid product in accordance with the above described method.
In accordance with another aspect, the invention provides a system suitable for determining if a piece of luggage contains a liquid product, the liquid product being comprised of a container holding a body of liquid. The system comprises an inspection device for performing an X-ray inspection on the product using penetrating radiation to generate X-ray image data associated with the product under inspection. The system also comprises an apparatus for determining if the piece of luggage contains a liquid product in accordance with the above described method. The system also comprises a display screen in communication with the apparatus for visually conveying to an operator information related to a presence of a liquid product in the piece of luggage, the information conveyed to the operator being based on information released by the apparatus.
In accordance with another broad aspect, the invention provides a method for determining if a piece of luggage contains a liquid product, the liquid product being comprised of a container holding a body of liquid. The method comprises receiving X-ray image data conveying an image of the piece of luggage, the X-ray image data being generated by scanning the luggage with an X-ray scanner. The method also comprises processing the X-ray image data with a computer to detect a signature of the liquid product in the X-ray image data and determine if a liquid product is present in the piece of luggage. The method also comprises generating a detection signal conveying whether a liquid product has been identified in the piece of luggage. The method also comprises rendering a visual representation of the piece of luggage on a display to convey information to an operator related to a detected liquid product in the piece of luggage, the visual representation of the piece of luggage being derived at least in part based on the X-ray image data and the detection signal.
In accordance with another aspect, the invention provides a computer readable storage medium storing a program element suitable for execution by a computing apparatus for determining if a piece of luggage contains a liquid product in accordance with the above described method.
In accordance with another broad aspect, the invention provides an apparatus suitable for determining if a piece of luggage contains a liquid product in accordance with the above described method.
In accordance with another aspect, the invention provides a system suitable for determining if a piece of luggage contains a liquid product, the liquid product being comprised of a container holding a body of liquid. The system comprises an inspection device for performing an X-ray inspection on the product using penetrating radiation to generate X-ray image data associated with the product under inspection. The system also comprises an apparatus for determining if the piece of luggage contains a liquid product in accordance with the above described method. The system also comprises a display screen in communication with the apparatus for visually conveying to an operator information related to a presence of a liquid product in the piece of luggage, the information conveyed to the operator being based on information released by the apparatus.
In accordance with a specific example of information, the visual representation of the piece of luggage conveys a location in the piece of luggage corresponding to a detected liquid product. In a non-limited example of implementation, the location in the piece of luggage corresponding to the detected liquid product is conveyed by highlighting a portion of the visual representation of the piece of luggage.
Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying Figures.
A detailed description of examples of implementation of the present invention is provided hereinbelow with reference to the following drawings, in which:
In the drawings, embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood that the description and drawings are only for purposes of illustration and as an aid to understanding, and are not intended to be a definition of the limits of the invention.
The X-ray scanning system 10 includes an X-ray scanner 12 having a X-ray scanning area 14 in which objects to be scanned are carried by a conveyor belt 16. In the specific example of implementation of the invention, the X-ray scanning system 10 is used for scanning luggage 17, such as suitcases, bags or any other container used to store the belongings of a traveler. Accordingly, the X-ray scanning system 10 can be used at security checkpoints such as at airports to determine if the piece of luggage holds liquid products.
The X-ray scanner 12 has a source of X-ray radiation 18, which typically would be located under the conveyor belt 16 which generates X-rays toward the object to be scanned, namely the luggage 17. The X-rays interact with the contents of the luggage, including the liquid product. X-ray detectors (not-shown) in the drawings capture the X-rays subsequent to the interaction and generate an X-ray image signal that encodes the interaction.
The X-ray scanner 12 can be a single view apparatus or a multi-view apparatus. A single view apparatus is an apparatus that generates X-ray image data of the luggage 17 from one perspective (view). Typically, a single view apparatus has a single radiation source which represents the point of view from which the X-ray image data is produced. A multi-view apparatus provides an X-ray image data that depicts the luggage 17 from two or more perspectives. In a specific example, the perspectives are orthogonal to one another, such as a bottom view and a side view. In this instance, several radiation sources are used, one for each view. It is also possible to provide a third view, in order to create a three-dimensional X-ray image that shows the luggage 17 from three sides.
Note that while the present specification uses an X-ray scanner as an example to perform the detection of the liquid product in the luggage 17, other types of penetrating radiation can also be considered for performing the scanning operation.
Irrespective of the number of views that the X-ray scanning device 12 uses, it outputs X-ray image data at an output 20. The X-ray image data is digital information that encodes the interaction between the X-rays and the contents of the luggage 17. The particular data format or communication protocol is not critical for the success of the invention and many different possibilities exist in this regard, without departing from the spirit of the invention.
A data processing apparatus 22 is connected to the output and receives the X-ray image data and processes the X-ray image data in order to determine if the luggage 17 contains a liquid product. The data processing apparatus 22 generates on the basis of the image processing operation that it performed detection information that indicates if a liquid product has been identified in the luggage 17. The detection information can be conveyed in a number of possible ways. In one simple example, the detection information can trigger an alarm that simply indicates to a human operator that a liquid product has been identified in the luggage 17. The alarm can be visual or oral. In a different possibility, the detection information can be embedded into an image signal used to drive a display device at the operator console to show an image of the luggage 17. The image is generated on the basis of the X-ray image data. One or more individual images can be shown on the display device. In the example illustrated in
For instance, the detection information is such as to inform the operator that a liquid product has been identified and also provides location information indicating the location of the liquid product in the luggage 17. The location information may be conveyed by highlighting the portion of the X-ray image that depicts the liquid product. Examples of highlighting include drawing the outline of the portion of the X-ray image that depicts the liquid product with a contrasting color, filling the entire portion of the X-ray image of interest with a pattern of color, generating a mark that on the image that visually draws the attention of the observer or de-emphasizing the other areas of the X-ray image such that only the portion of interest is clear and visible. When a mark is being inserted in the image, the mark can be an arrow, a circle or any other geometric figure drawn adjacent the X-ray image portion of interest.
When two or more images of the luggage 17 are rendered on the monitors 24, 26 the detection information has multiple components, one for each set of image data associated to a particular view of the luggage 17. In a multi-view X-ray scanning system 10 context, the detection information conveyed by the image data designates in each image the presence and the location of the liquid product. In this fashion, both images of the luggage 17 show to the operator the location of the liquid product in the respective view. When the monitor 24 is set to illustrate a front view of the luggage 17, the detection information will highlight a portion of the X-ray image showing liquid product as it would appear when the luggage is looked at from the front. Similarly, the monitor 26 will show a side view of the luggage 17, the liquid product being highlighted to show how it would appear when the luggage 17 is seen from that perspective. This provides the operator with the ability to build a mental image of the internal contents of the luggage 17 in order to better appreciate the location of the liquid product relative to other items in the luggage 17 and also to validate the results of the detection process, namely that the highlighted areas are indeed different views of a liquid product and not of something else.
The detection information can also be used as an input to a secondary processing stage that is designed to automatically determine if the liquid in the liquid product is licit or illicit. The detection information supplied to the secondary processing indicates how the liquid interacts with X-rays which can be used to determine if the liquid is licit or illicit. In a specific example, the detection information may simply be the pixels that are within the boundary of the liquid product outline identified in the X-ray image data. Those pixels are analyzed by the secondary processing stage to determine if the liquid product is licit or illicit. What constitutes a licit product or an illicit may differ depending on the application. In a security screening context, a liquid product that may explode, is corrosive or flammable would typically be considered ‘illicit’. For cargo inspection applications, certain categories of products may be considered illicit such as alcohol, for instance.
The process starts at step 38, followed by step 40 at which the X-ray scanner 12 performs a scan of the luggage 17. This step assumes that the luggage 17 has been previously transported by the conveyor belt 16 in the scanning area 14. The X-ray scan generates X-ray image data that can be single view X-ray image data or multi-view X-ray image data as discussed earlier.
At step 42, the X-ray image data is transmitted to the data processing device 22 via the I/O 32. The X-ray image data is then stored in the machine readable storage 30 and it is ready for processing.
At step 44, a first processing thread is initiated. The X-ray image data is de-cluttered in order to remove from the image or to reduce the presence in the image of areas that are contrasting with neighboring areas. The specific purpose is to entirely remove or reduce the presence in image areas that potentially represent liquid products elements that are associated with another article which overlays the liquid product in the luggage 17. An example would be a clothes hanger that overlaps with the liquid product. The clothes hanger is made of metal that attenuates X-rays much more than the liquid product and would then clearly contrast with the liquid product image. Another example is an electrical wire that overlaps with the liquid product. The different X-ray attenuation characteristics of these articles will show in the image very clearly.
For image processing purposes it is generally desirable to “morph” the smaller component with the larger background (the liquid product) in order to obtain a more uniform image in which the smaller component will be less apparent. Different types of algorithms can be used to perform image de-cluttering. One such algorithm is the so called “bottom-hat filter”.
The de-cluttered image is processed at step 46 to perform edge detection. The purpose is to identify in the X-ray image data areas of the image that might be components of a liquid product and to define their edges. The output of this operation is a series of image areas (“blobs”) along with a definition of their boundaries. A boundary is considered to be a sharp and cleanly visible change in the X-ray image data attenuation values. The process uses programmable settings for what is considered to be a “sharp change”. Step 46 performs in fact a first pass operation that uses looser settings intended to capture anything that might be a boundary in the image. A second, tighter pass will be performed later, as it will be discussed below. The identification of blobs uses two assumptions; (1) the Zeff of a liquid product follows a predetermined Zeff variation pattern, in particular it is constant or varies at a slow rate. Therefore, locally Zeff changes little or not at all. (2) the image of the liquid product is bound by a visible edge in the image.
A watershed segmentation algorithm can be used for this step. The algorithm starts on seed regions in the image and grows these regions progressively until a sharp continuous boundary is found. The growth process is performed progressively. A blob is grown to encompass candidate pixels in the image when the processing determines that the Zeff variance between the Zeff values of the candidate pixels and adjacent pixels that are already part of the blob, is less than a predetermined amount.
The Zeff variance is a configurable range that is typically set in the range from 0.1 to 1.0. The growth process stops when a continuous boundary is encountered where the Zeff variance exceeds the limit.
Therefore, this operation produces a preliminary blob map that essentially segments the X-ray image into blobs and defines their respective boundaries.
A second processing thread is initiated with step 48 which processes the X-ray image data as received from the data processing device 22 in order to perform a Zeff filtering on the pixels in order to discard pixels that are obviously not liquids. This operation is based on the assumption that the Zeff of a liquid varies in a predetermined range and anything that is outside of this range is not a liquid. Accordingly, processing step 48 examines individually the pixels of the X-ray image data to retain only those that fall in the predetermined (but configurable) range. In a specific example of implementation, the Zeff estimate for a liquid is set in the range of about 6.0 to about 15.5. Therefore, areas of the image with Zeff estimates less than 6 or more than 15.5 are considered to represent materials other than liquids and are discarded.
The output of the processing step 48 is therefore a Zeff map which retains only the image areas that can potentially represent liquids.
Processing step 50 receives the blob map and filters the blob map on the basis of the Zeff map. The purpose of this operation is to discard the blobs that have a Zeff estimate which is outside the range associated with a liquid.
Step 52 performs a series of additional filtering operations that rely on geometric features of liquid products in order to disqualify blobs that are not likely to represent a liquid product or a component of a liquid product. The following filtering operations are being performed:
If the processing operation at step 46 has identified blobs that exceed the allowable size range, namely in excess of 15,000 pixels, which is determined by conditional step 54, edge detection step 46 is run one more time but with the Zeff variance threshold set at a tighter level in an attempt to break-up the larger blobs into smaller ones. This operation may be run iteratively several times with increasingly tighter variance levels. The number of variations can vary. In a specific example of implementation, they have been set to 2. If the operation breaks up the large blobs into smaller ones then processing returns back to step 52 that will filter the newly found blobs on the basis of size, solidity and aspect ratio. At this time, if exceedingly large blobs still remain, they are permanently discarded.
At step 56, the remaining blobs are compared to the background to see if they meet a minimum differentiation factor. In this example, the differentiation is a difference in X-ray attenuation between the blob and the background of the blob that is the area adjacent the blob boundary. This process assumes that in the luggage, the liquid product is overlapping with some other article. As such the X-ray image of the luggage conveys, in the area of the blob compound attenuation information, namely attenuation due to the liquid body in the liquid product and also attenuation due to the article that overlaps with the liquid body. However, outside of the blob, the liquid body no longer contributes to the attenuation and the attenuation is likely due only to the article. For the blob to represent a liquid body, the difference in X-ray attenuation between the blob and its background has to meet certain criteria. First the blob must convey more X-ray attenuation than the background area and not less. Secondly, the level of differentiation in X-ray attenuation should exceed a certain threshold. In a specific example of implementation, this threshold is set to the minimal degree of X-ray attenuation of a liquid body can manifest in practice. For instance, the benchmark that can be used is acetone, which is a liquid that attenuates X-rays to a lesser extent than other liquids which may be encountered in a security screening context. As such, the differentiation threshold is set to the X-ray attenuation value that a bottle of acetone manifests. The thickness of the bottle, which corresponds to the length of a path taken by an X-ray through the bottle, may be estimated in a number of different manners. In a specific example of implementation, the thickness of the bottle is set to a minimum reasonable thickness given the width of the blob. In a non-limiting example, the thickness of the bottle is estimated to the width of the blob divided by three. In this non-limiting example the bottle is assumed to have a generally elliptical cross-section and the width of the blob corresponds to the semi-major axis of the ellipse. The division by three is simply a value selected based on an assumption that it would be somewhat unlikely for an elliptical bottle have a ratio between its semi-major axis and semi-minor axis to be greater than three. It is however to be understand that alternative examples of implementation may make use of different approaches for estimating the path length for use in the calculation of the X-ray attenuation value.
If the degree of X-ray attenuation differentiation is less than the minimal threshold the blob is disqualified.
At step 58, the remaining blobs in the X-ray image data are compared to one another in order to qualify them in terms of likelihood of representing a liquid product or a portion of a liquid product. The purpose in ranking the blobs is to be able to select the top one or several blobs that have ranked higher than the others as likely portions of the image representing one or more liquid products. The blobs are qualified by using a fuzzy logic process on the basis of several factors. The fuzzy logic process is a thresholding operation using a trapezoidal function, shown in
The next step of the process is to compute for each blob a confidence score. The confidence score is the product of fuzzy memberships, for instance
Confidence=100.0×Fa×Fso×Fsy×Fw×Frz×Fie×Fg
Note that the factors listed above are examples only. They are not all required in all cases and other factors can also be used.
Processing step 60 ranks the blobs based on the confidence level computed at the previous step and performs a selection of the blobs that are likely liquid products. In a specific example of implementation a blob is a likely liquid product when the confidence level of the blob is above a certain threshold, which may vary depending on the system tolerance for false positives. A typical setting for the threshold is 80%, in other words every blob that has a confidence level in excess of this threshold is considered to represent a liquid product or a component of a liquid product.
The processing now continues with step 62 that will attempt to merge certain blobs which in reality may be different portions of the same liquid product. A liquid product may show in the X-ray image data as two blobs when an object “obscures” partially the liquid product, hence it appears in the X-ray image data as two blobs separated from one another. This is shown at
The merge operation attempts to find blobs that have similar characteristics and that logically would be parts of the same liquid product. Examples of characteristics that can be used in order to merge blobs include:
In making a decision on whether the blobs in the pair are part of the same liquid product, a fuzzy logic function, similar to the one described earlier can be used which takes into account the different factors above and computes a confidence level. Above a certain percentage, say 80% the system assumes that the blobs are in fact parts of the same liquid product and logically associates them.
Note that the blob merging operation can be run multiple times in an iterative fashion. If the first iteration successfully merges a pair of blobs, the operation is run again to see if another pair can be merged. In this fashion, images of liquid products that are highly fragmented into multiple blobs can be merged one pair of blobs at the time.
If the blob merging operation at step 62 has merged two or more blobs, then processing step 64 is initiated which re-computes the confidence value. Since the blobs have changed then the confidence factor that was attributed before the merge to the respective blobs may no longer be valid. A new confidence computation is then performed by following the steps discussed earlier.
At step 66 the blobs that are considered to be likely liquid products will be processed against signatures of known positives in order to further reduce the likelihood of incorrect results. The false positives are objects that are typically found in a luggage and share some of the features of a liquid product. The false positives filtering may be done on a number of factors, such as geometry and density among others. A database 68, which in practice may be part of the machine readable storage 30, contains signatures of articles that may register as false positives. The signatures may be related to the geometry of the article or may be related to the material that it is made from or possibly both. The step 66 will receive data from the database 68 which conveys the signature information and processes the X-ray image data at the areas where blobs have been identified as likely liquid products. The processing searches for the signatures and if any such signature is identified in the X-ray image, then the blob is disqualified as a false positive. Examples of articles that may register as liquid products include:
Accordingly, the output of step 66 is a further refined list of blobs from which known positives have been removed.
Processing step 70 is invoked when the X-ray scanner 12 has a multi view scanning capability. In such case, the X-ray scanner 12 generates multiple X-ray images of the luggage, where each image has the potential to show a liquid product that may be present in the luggage. Accordingly, additional confidence can be gained in the results of the processing operation to identify liquid products in the luggage, when the results are consistent across the entire image set. In other words, if a liquid product is identified in one of the images and a liquid product is also identified in one of the images then the likelihood of the identification being correct increases.
When multiple views of the luggage are present, the X-ray data from each view is processed independently as described earlier. The X-ray image data of each view is subjected to steps 42 to 66 to produce a list, associated with that particular view which indicates if a liquid product has been detected in the image and also providing characterizing information in connection with the liquid product, such as its location in the image along with the results of the processing performed to reach the conclusion.
The results for each view are then correlated to determine if they match. The correlation operation may involve the following steps that can be implemented individually or in combination:
At step 72, the detection signal is issued which indicates if the luggage 17 contains a liquid product and the location of the liquid product in the luggage 17. As discussed previously, the detection signal can be embedded in an image signal that shows to the operator the X-ray image of the suitcase, emphasizing the area of the image where the liquid product is located. Another possibility is to use the detection signal to initiate another processing operation which determines on the basis of the information conveyed by the X-ray image data if the liquid product is licit or illicit. In other words, in addition to determining if a liquid product is present in the luggage, the system additionally will determine the status of the liquid in terms of threat or legality. In this particular case, the detection signal will implicitly be conveyed by the results of the status assessment. For example, if the operator is notified that a dangerous liquid is present in the luggage, then it follows that a positive detection of a liquid product in the luggage has occurred.
Although various embodiments have been illustrated, this was for the purpose of describing, but not limiting, the invention. Various modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art and are within the scope of this invention, which is defined more particularly by the attached claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/387,578, which is a National Phase Entry application of international (PCT) patent application No. PCT/CA2010/001200 filed on Jul. 30, 2010 by Optosecurity et al. designating the United States, which in turn claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) based on U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/230,412 filed on Jul. 31, 2009. The contents of the above noted applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3342397 | Duitsman | Sep 1967 | A |
3589511 | Britt | Jun 1971 | A |
3609045 | Stein | Sep 1971 | A |
3673394 | Hartmann | Jun 1972 | A |
4075700 | Blay | Feb 1978 | A |
4392237 | Houston | Jul 1983 | A |
4454949 | Flum | Jun 1984 | A |
4497065 | Tisdale et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4709333 | Crawford | Nov 1987 | A |
4727562 | Belanger | Feb 1988 | A |
4864142 | Gomberg | Sep 1989 | A |
4870666 | Lonn | Sep 1989 | A |
4927022 | Wilson | May 1990 | A |
4962515 | Kopans | Oct 1990 | A |
4974247 | Friddell | Nov 1990 | A |
4985906 | Arnold | Jan 1991 | A |
5027378 | Fujii et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5044002 | Stein | Aug 1991 | A |
5056124 | Kakimoto et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5400381 | Steude et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5428657 | Papanicolopoulos et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5442672 | Bjorkholm et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5490218 | Krug et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5524133 | Neale et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5557108 | Tumer | Sep 1996 | A |
5568262 | LaChapelle et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5600303 | Husseiny et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600700 | Krug et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602890 | Gray et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5692029 | Husseiny et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5768334 | Maitrejean et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5838758 | Krug et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5864600 | Gray et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5974111 | Krug et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6018562 | Willson | Jan 2000 | A |
6026171 | Hiraoglu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041132 | Isaacs et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6054712 | Komardin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069936 | Bjorkholm | May 2000 | A |
6078642 | Simanovsky et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088423 | Krug et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122344 | Beevor | Sep 2000 | A |
6175655 | George, III et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201850 | Heumann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6542574 | Grodzins | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6654445 | Shepherd et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6707381 | Maloney | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707879 | McClelland et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721387 | Naidu et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721391 | McClelland et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6753527 | Yamagishi et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763083 | Fernandez | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6840120 | Sakairi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6952163 | Huey et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7033070 | Azami | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065175 | Green | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092485 | Kravis | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7149339 | Veneruso | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154985 | Dobbs et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7164750 | Nabors et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7257188 | Bjorkholm | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260254 | Highnam et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7274768 | Green | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7317390 | Huey et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7355402 | Taicher et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7386093 | Wu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7508908 | Hu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7614788 | Gatten | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7684605 | Klingenbeck-Regn | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7727567 | Heuft | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7787681 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789401 | Ambrefe, Jr. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7840360 | Micheels et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7869637 | Baumgart et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873201 | Eilbert et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7945017 | Chen et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8090150 | Garms | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116428 | Gudmundson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8150105 | Mian et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8260020 | Garms | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8831331 | Gudmundson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8867816 | Bouchard et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8879791 | Drouin et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20010033636 | Hartick et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020097833 | Kaiser et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030062373 | Holland | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040016271 | Shah et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040101097 | Wakayama et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040232092 | Cash | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040252024 | Huey et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050036689 | Mahdavieh | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058242 | Peschmann | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078801 | Georgeson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111618 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117700 | Peschmann | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050173284 | Ambrefe, Jr. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193648 | Klein et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226360 | Kaucic et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238232 | Ying et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060013464 | Ramsay et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022140 | Connelly et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060054682 | de la Huerga | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078085 | Zanker | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060086794 | Knowles et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098773 | Peschmann | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115044 | Wu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133566 | Li et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060187221 | Lakare et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193434 | Green | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203960 | Schlomka et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239402 | Hu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257005 | Bergeron et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070003009 | Gray | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013519 | Chung et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070041612 | Perron et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041613 | Perron et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058037 | Bergeron et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070098142 | Rothschild et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132580 | Ambrefe, Jr. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133743 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152033 | Hind et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168467 | Hu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192850 | Cowburn | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070217571 | Teslyar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070297560 | Song et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080056443 | Hu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062262 | Perron et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063140 | Awad | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080116267 | Barber | May 2008 | A1 |
20080138475 | Heuft | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152082 | Bouchard et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167552 | Bouchevreau et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170660 | Gudmundson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181473 | Garty et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080240578 | Gudmundson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253627 | Boyden et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080283761 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312768 | Ewing et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003514 | Edic et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090060135 | Morton | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090123051 | Tamai et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146061 | Manneschi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168963 | Harding | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175411 | Gudmundson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180591 | Baumgart | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196396 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090252295 | Foland | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100027741 | Doyle et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046704 | Song et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100074483 | Janes | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100127169 | Whittum et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100208972 | Bouchard et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220910 | Kaucic et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100277312 | Edic et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284514 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100329532 | Masuda et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007870 | Roux et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110172972 | Gudmundson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110243299 | Sugita et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120093367 | Gudmundson et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120275646 | Drouin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140198899 | Ziskin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211980 | Bouchard et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140241495 | Gudmundson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140321729 | Gudmundson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2574402 | Jan 2006 | CA |
2623812 | May 2007 | CA |
2666838 | Mar 2008 | CA |
2676913 | Mar 2008 | CA |
2651728 | Apr 2008 | CA |
2690163 | Apr 2008 | CA |
2692662 | Mar 2010 | CA |
2709468 | Mar 2010 | CA |
2696031 | May 2010 | CA |
2700553 | Jul 2010 | CA |
2189785 | May 2010 | EP |
2696196 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2331944 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2334565 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2420683 | May 2006 | GB |
2441551 | Mar 2008 | GB |
2006214725 | Aug 2006 | JP |
9412855 | Jun 1994 | WO |
9802763 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9945371 | Sep 1999 | WO |
03052398 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004054329 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2006119603 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2008009134 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008019473 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008034232 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008036456 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008040119 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008119151 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009024818 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009043145 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009046529 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009114928 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009127353 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010025538 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010025539 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010028474 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010145016 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United States Statutory Invention Registration, No. UD H2110 H, Newman, published Oct. 5, 2004, 6 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Jan. 10, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2007/001658, 6 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Jan. 10, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2007/001658, 12 pages. |
Informal Communication with the Applicant issued on Sep. 22, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2007/001658, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Dec. 17, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2007/001658, 7 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Jan. 14, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2007/001749, 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Jan. 14, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2007/001749, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Jan. 14, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2007/001749, 5 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Nov. 20, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/001591, 6 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Nov. 20, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/001591, 6 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Dec. 4, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/001721, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Dec. 4, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/001721, 5 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Dec. 5, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/001792, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Dec. 5, 2008 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/001792, 6 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Jun. 4, 2009 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/002025, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Jun. 4, 2009 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/002025, 6 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Jul. 6, 2009 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2009/000395, 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Jul. 6, 2009 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2009/000395, 4 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Aug. 6, 2009 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2009/000401, 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Aug. 6, 2009 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2009/000401, 8 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Nov. 10, 2009 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2009/000811, 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Nov. 10, 2009 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2009/000811, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Feb. 1, 2010 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/001792, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Apr. 7, 2010 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/001721, 6 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Sep. 22, 2010 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2010/000916, 6 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Sep. 22, 2010 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2010/000916, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Sep. 21, 2010 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2008/001591, 7 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued on Nov. 19, 2010 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2010/001200, 6 pages. |
International Search Report issued on Nov. 19, 2010 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2010/001200, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Jan. 12, 2011 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2009/000401, 15 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Oct. 24, 2011 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2010/000916, 17 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Nov. 22, 2011 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2010/001200, 12 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Jul. 29, 2009 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,651,728, 6 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Jul. 10, 2009 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,666,838, 3 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Nov. 3, 2009 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,666,838, 5 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Jan. 28, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,676,913, 2 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Jan. 28, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,666,838, 5 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Mar. 2, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,676,903, 4 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Mar. 19, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,651,728, 2 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Mar. 31, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,690,163, 3 pages. |
Office Action mailed on May 5, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,676,913, 2 pages. |
Office Action mailed on May 14, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,690,831, 3 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Jun. 7, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,692,662, 3 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Jun. 30, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,696,031, 2 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Jun. 28, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,697,525, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 5, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/385,253, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Aug. 12, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/311,522, 16 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Aug. 31, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,690,831, 2 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Aug. 31, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,692,662, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 30, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. 12/311,031, 7 pages. |
Non-final Office Action issued on Nov. 20, 2014 in connection with U.S. Appl No. 14/244,213, 10 pages. |
European Search Report mailed on Apr. 14, 2014 in connection with Europeant Patent Application 10788557.6, 8 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jul. 9, 2014 in connection with European Patent Application 09839849.8, 3 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jun. 26, 2014 in connection with European Patent Application 07815851.6, 4 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jul. 15, 2014 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,677,439, 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued on Jun. 25, 2014 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/387,578, 8 pages. |
Airport Magazine, Solutions, Products, Services, vol. 7, Mar. 2006, 5 pages. |
Bottigli et al., “Voxel-based Monte Carlo Simulation of X-Ray imaging and spectroscopy experiments” Spectrochimia Acta. Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, vol. 59, No. 10-11—Oct. 8, 2004, XP004598270, pp. 1747-1754. |
Benjamin, R., “Object-Based 3D X-Ray Imaging for Second-line Security Screening”, London, 1995, (Abstract), 1 page. |
Dreisetel, Pia et al. “Detection of liquid explosives using tomosynthetic reconstruction in multiview dual-energy x-ray systems”,1st EU Conference on the Detection of Explosives, held in Avignon, France, from Mar. 14 to 16, 2011, 4 pages. |
Freud et al., “Simulation of X-ray NDT Imaging Techniques”, Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, Rome, Oct. 15-21, 2000, http://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn256/idn256.htm, pages consulted on Dec. 3, 2009, 7 pages. |
Gao et al., “Application of X-ray CT to liquid security inspection: System analysys and beam hardening correction”, Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Section—A:Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipement, Elsevier, Aug. 8, 2007, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 579, No. 1, pp. 395-399. |
Optosecurity, “Security Technology Overview: Advanced Vehicle Verification & Threat Identification”, published prior to Sep. 15, 2008, 1 page. |
Page, D. L. et al., “Perception-based 3D Triangle Mesh Segmentation Using Fast Marching Watersheds.”, Proc. Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Madison, WI, Jun. 2003, vol. II, pp. 27-32. |
PinPoint TM Threat Identification Software, http://www.guardiantechintl.com/security.php?npage=pinpoint, Jul. 25, 2005, 4 pages. |
“Secure Flight Passenger Screening Program”, http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/systems/passenger—screen.htm, Oct. 28, 2005, 6 pages. |
Sluser M et al., “Model-based probabilistic relaxation segmentation applied to threat detection in airport x-ray imagery”, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1999 IEEE Canadian Conference on Edmonton, Alta., Canada, May 9 to May 12, 1999, vol. 2, XP032158352, pp. 720-726. |
Xiang Li et al., “A numerical simulator in VC++ on PC for iterative image reconstruction”, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology, vol. 11, No. 2, Jan. 1, 2003, XP055063644, issn: 0895-3996, pp. 61-70. |
Xie et al., “Simulation of X-ray Imaging Systems for Luggage Inspection”, Second Explosives Detection Symposium and Aviation Security Conference, Nov. 12-15, 1996, pp. 248-253. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Aug. 5, 2014 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,737,075—3 pages. |
Restriction Requirement issued on Sep. 11, 2014 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,213—6 pages. |
Non-final Office Action issued on Aug. 13, 2014 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/377,872—19 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Oct. 6, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,696,031, 2 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Oct. 29, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,651,728, 6 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Oct. 28, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,676,903, 2 pages. |
Office Action mailed on Nov. 2, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,690,163 , 1 page. |
Office Action mailed on Nov. 17, 2010 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,709,468, 2 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jan. 31, 2011 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,697,525, 2 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 10, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/680,622, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 8, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/385,253, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 9, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/311,522, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 2, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/311,031, 9 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Mar. 29, 2011 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,725,626, 5 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Mar. 29, 2011 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,690,831, 2 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Apr. 20, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/311,031, 20 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on May 2, 2011 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,692,662, 3 pages. |
European Search Report mailed on Jun. 9, 2011 in connection with European Patent Application 07815851, 6 pages. |
Notice of allowance mailed on May 5, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/385,253, 8 pages. |
Notice of allowance mailed on May 6, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/311,522, 7 pages. |
Notice of allowance mailed on May 6, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/680,622 , 8 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jul. 5, 2011 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,696,031, 2 pages. |
Examiner's Report issued on Jul. 19, 2011 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,651,728, 2 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Aug. 10, 2011 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,725,626, 4 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Sep. 2, 2011 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,737,075, 3 pages. |
Notice of allowance mailed on Sep. 15, 2011 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/311,031, 11 pages. |
Search Report mailed on Oct. 11, 2011 in connection with European Patent Application 09810945.7, 7 pages. |
Search Report mailed on Feb. 17, 2012 in connection with European Patent Application 08835738.9, 7 pages. |
Search Report mailed on Feb. 1, 2012 in connection with European Patent Application 08876865.0, 7 pages. |
Search Report mailed on Jul. 18, 2012 in connection with European Patent Application 09839849.8, 8 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jul. 18, 2012 in connection with European Patent Application 09810945.7, 4 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Aug. 31, 2012 in connection with European Patent Application 07815851.6, 6 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Nov. 7, 2012 in connection with European Patent Application 08876865.0, 3 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jan. 16, 2013 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,697,586, 3 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Feb. 4, 2013 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,677,439, 2 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued on Mar. 1, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/681,826, 32 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued on Feb. 28, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/063,869, 52 pages. |
Restriction Requirement issued on Mar. 11, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/680,625, 6 pages. |
Notice of intent to grant issued on Apr. 11, 2013 in connection with European patent application 08876865.0, 5 pages. |
Notice of intent to grant issued on May 14, 2013 in connection with European patent application 09810945.7, 5 pages. |
Restriction Requirement issued on Jun. 14, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/864,988, 6 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on May 29, 2013 in connection with European Patent Application 09839849.8, 6 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jul. 22, 2013 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,737,075, 3 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jul. 23, 2013 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,677,439, 2 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued on Aug. 14, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/680,625, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued on Sep. 25, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/313,635, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued on Oct. 31, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/864,988, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action issued on Nov. 14, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/063,869, 50 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued on Dec. 2, 2013 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/680,625, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued on Dec. 18, 2013 in connection with European Patent Application 13191619.9, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued on Jan. 16, 2014 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/313,635, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued on Feb. 21, 2014 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/864,988, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued on Mar. 17, 2014 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/387,578, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action issued on Feb. 17, 2015 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. No. 13/377,872, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action issued on Mar. 20, 2015 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,213, 7 pages. |
Examiner's Report issued on Apr. 7, 2015 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,697,586, 6 pages. |
Non-final Office Action issued on Nov. 20, 2014 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,213, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued on Jun. 12, 2015 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/377,872—7 pages. |
Examiner's Report issued on Jun. 29, 2015 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,677,439—3 pages. |
Examiner's Report mailed on Jul. 17, 2015 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,737,075—6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action ssued on Jul. 2, 2015 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/063,869—37 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150010128 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61230412 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13387578 | US | |
Child | 14496676 | US |