1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method and system for retrieving lost or stolen devices. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and system for identifying lost or stolen portable computers as they pass through an airport checkpoint.
2. Description of the Related Art
The theft of portable devices, especially portable electronic devices, continues to be a widespread problem in the United States and world-wide. Each year, millions of dollars worth of electronic equipment such as portable, or laptop, computers are stolen or lost. Typically, when a device is lost or stolen, the owner has no way of retrieving or otherwise locating the device. He or she is then forced to replace the lost item, or make do without it.
Currently existing technology allows devices to be identified by means of radio frequency identification (RFID) tags. RFID technology uses electromagnetic energy (such as radio) as a medium through which information is sent. Referring to
RFID technology overcomes many limitations of other automatic identification approaches, such as those using bar codes and infrared technology, which use light to communicate. Since an RFID tag 102 does not require a visual scanner, or other vision system, to detect its presence, it may be hidden or invisible to the eye and may also be used in harsh or dirty environments. A reader 104 reads information transmitted by the RFID tag 102 even if the tag 102 is completely hidden from view.
An RFID tag 102 typically includes a receiver and some type of transmitter, an antenna, and memory. There are two categories of RFID tags—active and passive—that represent two different types of RF communication. Tags without batteries are known as passive tags because they derive their power from the RF energy transmitted from a reader. Passive RFID tags tend to be smaller and exhibit short range transmission characteristics (under six feet), whereas battery-powered, active tags, tend to be larger and exhibit long range transmission characteristics (over one hundred feet).
Active tags send data back to the reader with radio power generated from a battery within the tag. Passive tags, on the other hand, use modulated backscatter (MBS) to transmit reflected energy, dictated by the data stream from the tag, back to the reader. Passive tags using MBS are better suited for gate or lane applications where it is undesirable to wake up (see) any tags beyond a certain distance and where there are few obstructions in the energy path.
With the aid of RFID technology, devices which are brought within range of a reader, or interrogator, may be detected. Furthermore, known devices, such as those on assembly lines, can be identified and their progress tracked using this technology. However, there is currently no method or system which provides a mechanism by which it can be determined if the device being detected is lost or stolen. To accomplish this purpose and to be of value, such a system would not only have to identify the device, but be able to determine that it was, in fact, lost or stolen and thereafter, notify appropriate personnel of the matter. Additionally, the reader of such an anti-theft/retrieval system, would best be strategically located so as to make it likely that a significant number of lost or stolen devices would come within range of the reader.
Therefore, what is needed is a method and system of identifying devices, which are randomly brought within range of a reader, determining if the detected devices are lost or stolen and thereafter, notifying appropriate security personnel when such device is located.
The invention addresses the above and other needs by providing a method and system which utilizes RFID technology to identify lost or stolen goods that randomly come within range of an RFID reader, and thereafter, notifies security personnel of the lost or stolen status of the goods.
In one embodiment of the invention, a system for identifying a lost or stolen device, includes: a transmitter, coupled to the device, for transmitting identification information; a receiver which receives the identification information transmitted by the transmitter, when the transmitter is within a defined distance from the receiver; and a computer, coupled to the receiver so as to receive the information from the receiver, said computer having a first database for storing data associated with lost or stolen devices, wherein said computer compares the information with the stored data, and generates an alarm if the information matches at least some of the stored data.
In another embodiment, a system for identifying a lost or stolen item, includes: a radio frequency identification device, connected to the item, for transmitting information related to the item; a reader which receives the information transmitted by the radio frequency identification device, when the radio frequency identification device is within a defined distance from the reader; and a computer, coupled to the reader so as to receive the information from the reader, said computer having a database for storing a list of lost or stolen items, wherein the computer compares the information with the list of lost or stolen devices, and generates an alarm if the comparison produces a match.
In another embodiment, a system for identifying lost or stolen goods, includes: means for receiving data transmitted by a radio frequency identification device coupled to an item when the item comes within a defined distance of the means for receiving; means for storing a list of lost or stolen goods; means for comparing the data to the list of lost or stolen goods and determining if the data matches information contained in the list of lost or stolen goods; and means for generating an alarm, if the data matches information contained in the list.
In a further embodiment of the invention, a system for identifying a lost or item includes: means for storing identification information in a memory of a radio frequency identification (RFID) device contained within the item, wherein the RFID device transmits the identification information; means for reporting when the item is lost or stolen; means for receiving the identification information transmitted by the RFID device when the item comes within a defined range of the means for receiving; means for storing data associated with lost or stolen items; means for comparing the received identification information to the data associated with the lost or stolen items and for determining if the identification information indicates that the item is lost or stolen; means for generating an alarm, if the identification information indicates the item is lost or stolen, so as to alert personnel of the lost or stolen status of the item; and means for updating the data associated with the lost or stolen items.
In yet another embodiment, the invention is a method of identifying lost or stolen goods, which includes the acts of: receiving information transmitted by a radio frequency identification (RFID) device, coupled to an item, when the item comes within a defined range of a receiver which receives the information; storing data associated with lost or stolen goods in a database coupled to the receiver; comparing the information to the data and determining if the information matches the data associated with the lost or stolen goods; and generating an alarm, if the information matches the data.
In another embodiment, the method of the invention includes: storing identification information in a memory of a radio frequency identification (RFID) device contained within an item, wherein the RFID device transmits the identification information; maintaining a list of lost or stolen items in a database of a computer; receiving the identification information transmitted by the RFID device when the computer comes within a defined range of a receiver, coupled to the computer; comparing the received identification information to the list of lost or stolen items and determining if the identification information indicates that the item is included in the list of lost or stolen items; and generating an alarm, if the identification information indicates the item is lost or stolen.
The invention is described in detail below with reference to the figures, wherein like elements are referenced with like numerals throughout.
Referring to
In one embodiment, the corridor 204 may be a metal detector such as those typically located in or near an airport terminal. Alternatively, the corridor 204 may be replaced by an x-ray machine, such as those which are typically located next to a metal detector in an airport, which includes a conveyor belt for transporting items placed thereon under an x-ray scanner.
By placing the RFID reader 202 near the metal detector and/or the x-ray machine of an airport checkpoint, the invention provides a security measure against persons trying to board a plane with lost or stolen property. Alternatively, or as an additional security measure, a reader 202 may be positioned near a baggage check-in point such that all baggage being loaded into a plane may be screened for lost or stolen devices. Therefore, by placing readers 202 at strategic checkpoints, within an airport, for example, a radio frequency security net/retrieval system is established which can identify lost/stolen items and assist security personnel stationed near each checkpoint in retrieving the lost/stolen devices. As used herein, the term “checkpoint” refers to any location or point in which people and/or items must pass in order to move on to another location or point.
In the scenario described above, it may be preferable to utilize a transmitter 210, and/or reader 202 with a short transmission/reception range, e.g., six feet, so as to not read transmitters that are far away from the reader 202. Since it is an object of the invention to identify a particular item which has been reported to be lost or stolen, it is counter-productive to receive information from multiple transmitters located in different areas. In such a scenario, one could not be sure which transmitter was transmitting information indicating the presence of a lost or stolen item. In one embodiment, the transmitter 210 is a passive RFID tag.
Coupled to the reader 202 is a computer 212 which receives information from the reader 202 and compares the information to a list of lost and/or stolen devices, stored in a database 214 coupled to the computer 212. Upon comparing the information received from the transmitter 210 to the list of lost and/or stolen devices, the computer 212 determines if there is a match. If there is a match, the computer 212 generates an appropriate alarm signal to notify personnel stationed near the location of the reader 202 and corridor 204 of the status of the device 208 so that appropriate action can be taken. As used herein, the term “list” refers to any format in which data, or information may be stored so as to be retrievable for purposes of review and/or analysis.
In one embodiment, the transmitter 210 may be a standard radio frequency identification (RFID) tag which is well-known in the industry. In another embodiment, the transmitter 210 is a MicroStamp® remote intelligent communications (RIC) device, manufactured by Micron Communications, Inc. Microstamp® is a registered trademark for a family of RIC devices that use active and passive transmitters. However, RIC devices differ from traditional RFID devices in that RIC devices typically have a battery, a microprocessor, a high-frequency radio, more memory and longer range capability when compared to standard RFID devices.
The MicroStamp® RIC device contains a MicroStamp Engine™ integrated circuit (IC), which combines a direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) microwave frequency radio, a microcontroller, and a low power static random access memory (SRAM) into a single chip. The MicroStamp Engine IC, when coupled with an antenna and a battery, forms the MicroStamp RIC device. Because the IC combines hundreds of thousands of components on one small chip, the MicroStamp RIC device may be assembled, with a small battery, into very small packages, making it ideal for applications in small handheld, or portable, electronic devices. Although RIC devices are typically more advanced than standard RFID tags, as used herein, the term “radio frequency identification,” or “RFID tag”, or “RFID device”, and any combination or conjugation thereof, refers to both standard RFID devices and RIC devices as described above, as well as any radio frequency transmission device, capable of transmitting data for identification purposes to a receiver.
In one embodiment, the reader 202 is a MicroStamp® 4000 RF Interrogator, manufactured by Micron Communications, Inc. The function of this interrogator 202 is twofold: 1) it receives commands and data from the computer 212 and sends data packets to the remote intelligent communications (RIC) unit 210, and 2) it receives reply packets from the RIC unit 210 and passes the reply back to the computer 212. When the interrogator 202 receives a command from the computer 212, the interrogator 202 either executes the command internally, or transmits the command to the RIC unit 210. The RIC unit 210 then executes the command, but may or may not reply, depending on the command's specific function. When the RIC unit 210 replies, the interrogator 202 passes the reply back to the computer 212. This communication protocol between the RIC unit 210, the interrogator 202 and the computer 212 is well-known in the art.
In one embodiment, the computer 212 is directly connected to the reader 202 by the communications link 216, which may be any type of electrical cable having a parallel or serial port connector for interfacing with the external ports of the computer 212, such as an enhanced parallel port (EPP), RS-232, RS-422 or RS-485 communications line, for example. As mentioned above, the communications link 216 may be any type of well-known communications links, or medium, used for transmitting data from one device to another. In one embodiment, The computer 212 may be located near the reader 202 such that security personnel can view a display screen (not shown) of the computer 212 as people pass through the corridor 204 to verify that each person passing through is not carrying an item which has been reported to be lost or stolen. If a person passing through the corridor 204 is carrying a lost or stolen item, the computer 212 should identify the item and, thereafter notify security personnel by displaying a message on its display screen or providing a visual and/or auditory alarm signal.
Alternatively, the computer 212 may be a local computer 212, that is not located near any one reader 202 but, instead, has many readers 202 coupled to it, each reader monitoring a different checkpoint. In this scenario, each reader 202 at each checkpoint requires a means for alerting security personnel stationed at each of the checkpoints. This function can be performed in a number of different ways. For example, an operator monitoring the local computer 212 can call, via telephone, intercom, radio, etc., security personnel located at a particular checkpoint with instructions. Alternatively, the local computer 212 may send an alarm signal to a device located near the particular checkpoint which can provide a visual and/or auditory alarm signal to security personnel stationed at the checkpoint.
As shown in
Referring to
In order to police for lost or stolen items, a system must be established to report and record lost and stolen items in an efficient and timely manner. For example, after an owner of an item has reported the item to be stolen, its serial number, or other identifying information, should be promptly stored in the central database 218 and provided to each of the local computers 212 to enable them to monitor for the item within a relatively short time after it has been reported to be lost or stolen. Therefore, in one embodiment, the database 214 within the computer 212 is periodically updated with the latest list of lost or stolen goods from the central database 218. The frequency of these updates can be responsive to addition or deletion of an item from the master list stored in the central database 218, or alternatively, the update can occur at predetermined time intervals.
For example, when an owner of a laptop computer discovers that his or her laptop is lost or stolen, the owner can report the missing item to a manufacturer, dealer, or other authorized agent, who can then add the lost/stolen computer to the list of lost/stolen items in the central database 218. The authorized agent may then input the lost/stolen computer's serial number into the central database 218. This serial number is the information, or at least part of the information, which is transmitted by the transmitter 210 (
When a person carrying the lost/stolen laptop computer attempts to pass through a checkpoint, represented by corridor 204 in
After a lost or stolen laptop computer has been retrieved, its serial number, or other identifying information should be removed from the master list of lost or stolen devices. When local lists are updated by the master list, the retrieved laptop computer will also be removed from all local lists of lost or stolen devices.
For security reasons, the list of lost or stolen goods should only be accessible by authorized personnel. In one embodiment, to add or delete an item from the list of lost or stolen items which is stored in the central database 218, a person must provide a password to verify and authenticate his or her identity. Only after such a password is received and verified can that person obtain access to the central database 218. It is also contemplated that the owner of the laptop computer will be able to personally call a “hotline” telephone number that allows the owner to add the serial number of his or her lost laptop computer to the master list of lost or stolen goods, after passing certain security measures, such as entering a registered password, for example.
Referring to
The transmitter 210 should be permanently attached to an internal portion of the computer 400 so as to not be easily accessible. Therefore, a thief would not be able to circumvent the security features provided by the transmitter 210 by simply removing the transmitter 210. In one embodiment, the transmitter 210 is embedded in the housing of the computer 400 during its manufacture. Since typical radio frequency devices are capable of transmitting and receiving data when encapsulated by plastic, or other similar materials, encapsulating the transmitter 210 within a portion of the housing of the computer 400, will not significantly degrade the performance of the transmitter 210. After the transmitter 210 is programmed with a serial number, or other identifying information, related to the computer 400, the transmitter 210 can transmit this information. In one embodiment, this information may be programmed into the memory of the transmitter 210 by utilizing a designated reader 202 (
Once the identifying information has been stored in the memory of the transmitter 210, it should be unalterable, except by authorized personnel and/or the registered owner of the item containing the transmitter 210. Any well-known method of ensuring the integrity of the information stored in the transmitter 210, such as password protection and/or encryption schemes, may be utilized in accordance with the invention.
As described above, the invention provides a method and system which utilizes radio frequency technology to identify lost or stolen goods that randomly come within range of a reader capable of receiving information transmitted by a radio frequency transmitter permanently fixed within the lost or stolen goods. After identifying an item which has been reported to be lost or stolen, the method and system notifies designated personnel, as necessary.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims, rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/649,372, filed Aug. 26, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,230,534, issued Jun. 12, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/049,687, filed Mar. 27, 1998, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING LOST OR STOLEN DEVICES,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,609,656, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4284985 | Heger et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4686514 | Liptak, Jr. et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4739328 | Koelle | Apr 1988 | A |
4804943 | Soleimani | Feb 1989 | A |
5131038 | Puhl et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5231273 | Caswell et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5283856 | Gross et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5299116 | Owens et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5310999 | Claus et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313052 | Watanabe et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317309 | Vercellotti et al. | May 1994 | A |
5349332 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5406261 | Glenn | Apr 1995 | A |
5422930 | McDonald et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430441 | Bickley | Jul 1995 | A |
5430447 | Meier | Jul 1995 | A |
5448748 | Yawata et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5475734 | McDonald et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5497140 | Tuttle | Mar 1996 | A |
5513126 | Harkins et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5555426 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5619648 | Canale et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630060 | Tang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635693 | Benson | Jun 1997 | A |
5646592 | Tuttle | Jul 1997 | A |
5661286 | Fujioka | Aug 1997 | A |
5675321 | McBride | Oct 1997 | A |
5742237 | Bledsoe | Apr 1998 | A |
5748084 | Isikoff | May 1998 | A |
5757271 | Andrews | May 1998 | A |
5764892 | Cain et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765033 | Miloslavsky | Jun 1998 | A |
5767771 | Lamont | Jun 1998 | A |
5769032 | Yarnall et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5793639 | Yamazaki | Aug 1998 | A |
5796948 | Cohen | Aug 1998 | A |
5802280 | Cotichini et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805820 | Bellovin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5874724 | Cato | Feb 1999 | A |
5886634 | Muhme | Mar 1999 | A |
5896497 | Halstead | Apr 1999 | A |
5912644 | Wang | Jun 1999 | A |
5914671 | Tuttle | Jun 1999 | A |
5920287 | Belcher et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925103 | Magallanes et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933098 | Haxton | Aug 1999 | A |
5936526 | Klein | Aug 1999 | A |
5936527 | Isaacman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963134 | Bowers et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6011473 | Klein | Jan 2000 | A |
6025780 | Bowers et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025784 | Mish | Feb 2000 | A |
6031894 | Fleming, III | Feb 2000 | A |
6052782 | Fleming, III | Apr 2000 | A |
6112024 | Almond et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128739 | Fleming, III | Oct 2000 | A |
6157871 | Terranova | Dec 2000 | A |
6177860 | Cromer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6275153 | Brooks | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6447294 | Price | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6609656 | Elledge | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6988071 | Gazdzinski | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7230534 | Elledge | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20020014952 | Terranova | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20050040961 | Tuttle | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050206523 | Engellenner | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060055538 | Ritter | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080012711 | Elledge | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024303 | Elledge | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080117025 | Tuttle | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
5-233646 | Sep 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070252697 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10649372 | Aug 2003 | US |
Child | 11759743 | US | |
Parent | 09049687 | Mar 1998 | US |
Child | 10649372 | US |