There is a continuing need to obtain more margin in communication channels for near-end and far-end crosstalk (NEXT and FEXT), and alien near-end and far-end crosstalk (ANEXT and AFEXT). A major source of NEXT and FEXT occurs within the plug of a plug/jack combination and is typically compensated for within the jack. A major source of alien crosstalk is common mode noise that couples between channels, particularly between adjacent jacks, and becomes converted into differential alien crosstalk (mode conversion).
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The examples set out herein illustrate some preferred embodiments of the invention, and such examples are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Compensation methods and devices are described in a novel design for an improved category 6A (CAT6A) RJ45 jack design, to exceed TIA category 6A standards at 500 MHz, in U.S. Pat. No. 8,137,141, which is based off of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/090,403, entitled “High-Speed Connector with Multi-Stage Compensation,” filed Aug. 20, 2008, which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. This jack addresses the need within the industry to obtain more margin for near end crosstalk (NEXT), far end crosstalk (FEXT), and return loss in order to meet the needs of demanding customers. Additionally, this jack reduces the differential to common and common to differential mode conversion (herein referred to as “mode conversion”) that occurs within the jack to improve the alien crosstalk performance of the system.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0134995, also incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein, discloses communications jacks which are provided with conductive covering layers to reduce the amount of ANEXT between connectors at insulation displacement contacts (IDCs) when the jacks are installed alongside one another. These conductive layers or foils are also part of the above cited U.S. Pat. No. 8,137,141.
In other advances, the present invention addresses some of the current limitations in channel and permanent link performance respective to jack return loss margin at higher frequencies. In one embodiment of the present invention the jack transmission line components can include plug interface contacts (PICs) that mate with a plug and wrap around a sled and interface with a rigid circuit board, a flex circuit board that wraps around the sled with components in contact with the PICs, rigid circuit board circuit elements, and IDCs which also interface with the rigid circuit board and which allow for wires within cabling to connect with the IDCs. The plug/PICs, flex board, PIC region of the rigid board, and a compensation region of the rigid board can be considered a first impedance region; and the IDC vias region of the rigid board and IDCs can be considered a second impedance region following the first impedance region. If a jack connector has a relatively low impedance region (at the first impedance region) followed by a relatively high impedance region (at the second impedance region) there is more return loss margin at lower frequencies, but less return loss margin at higher frequencies. A jack with only the first low impedance region and not a relatively high impedance second region has less margin at lower frequencies, but more relative margin (as compared to a jack having a low impedance region followed by a relatively high impedance region) at higher frequencies. This same relationship applies when the magnitude values are opposite of that described, such as a jack with a high impedance region followed by a low impedance region, where an increase in the impedance of the low impedance region improves return loss.
Pair 4-5 is typically the pair with the worst return loss margin at higher frequencies in present day jack designs. Generally speaking, pair 4-5 has a low impedance region caused by the plug/PICs, flex board, PIC region of the rigid board, and compensation region of the rigid board, followed by a high impedance region caused by the respective IDCs and wire cap. A feature of the present invention is to reduce the impedance of the high impedance region so that the return loss gets relatively worse at lower frequencies, but the margin improves at high frequencies, which results in overall improved return loss margin relative to the CAT6A specification. Since the relationship between impedance and capacitance generally follows Z=√(L/C), capacitance is added in the high impedance region to reduce the impedance of the high impedance region.
In a patch panel or outlet where there are many jacks clustered within an area, high levels of alien crosstalk can occur between these neighboring jacks. Previous understanding of this concept indicated that this coupling was primarily due to inductive differential coupling caused by the proximity of the neighboring wires and blades in adjacent plugs and jacks, and particularly parallel portions which run adjacent to each other. The foil label designs of
However, it has been observed, that in a channel environment with a high level of common mode noise, that the foil shields provide an electrical connection (comprising a conductive path around the jack with capacitive coupling to adjacent jacks) for a common mode current to flow to and beyond neighboring jacks 27 as is shown by the arrows A in
In another aspect according to the present invention, it is desirable to have balanced capacitive and inductive loads between all differential pair combinations within the plug/jack combination in order to minimize mode conversion. It is also desirable to have each differential pair balanced with respect to the foil label design surrounding parts of the jack in order to further reduce mode conversion.
Herein described is a novel design for a jack with a foil label and an improved rigid circuit board that improves the balance of each differential pair on the jack with respect to the foil label, in addition to making improvements addressing the problems discussed above. The present invention reduces the mode conversion of the jack and improves alien crosstalk.
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
Communication cables 32 and 33 are shown in the form of an unshielded twisted pair (UTP) cable, and more particularly a CAT6A cable which can operate at 10 Gb/s. However, the present invention can be applied to and/or implemented in connection with a variety of communications cables. Cables 33 can be terminated directly into equipment 34, or alternatively, can be terminated in a variety of punchdown or jack modules 40 such as RJ45 type, jack module cassettes, and many other connector types, or combinations thereof. Patch cables 32 are typically terminated in plugs 36.
Crosstalk compensation components can be included on both PICs 56 and flexible board 54, as shown in
One of the novel aspects of the present invention is that it addresses a naturally unbalanced coupling which exists between all pairs and the foil label on the jack. The primary reason for this unbalance is shown in
An embodiment of a rigid board solution for balancing the pairs with respect to the foil shield is shown in
Similarly for pair 1-2, for example, IDC via 2′ and IDC 2′ are much closer to foil 70 than IDC via 1′ and IDC 1′ are. To balance this pair, conductive trace stub 92 is routed close to the edge of board 46 near the foil 70 and connected to trace 1 (conductive trace interconnecting PIC via 1 with IDC via1′) via plated through hole 94. Stub 92 is similar to stub 90; however, because of space limitations on rigid board 46, stub 92 is only 0.005 inches wide by 0.075 inches long, also in one ounce copper (approximately 0.0014 inches thick plus additional plating to achieve a thickness between 0.002-0.0035), although other thicknesses, widths and lengths are possible. To compensate for this relatively short length the pair 1-2 is further balanced by moving trace 1 very close to the board edge (closer to foil 70), and plated through hole 94 provides significant surface area in a third dimension (board thickness) which also capacitively couples to foil 70, giving stronger coupling between conductor 1 and the foil 70, thereby balancing the pair 1-2 with respect to foil 70. Unplated through holes generally at 96 reduce capacitance between traces 4 and 5 closer to the area of NEXT compensation to lessen the effects of compensation elements on return loss, by better impedance matching.
The result of the pair balancing with respect to the foil, and the use of a split foil is illustrated in
In other aspects of the present invention, through hole 100 (shown in
The asymmetric foil designs of
Alternative embodiments of the present invention include a jack with the circuit board of
While this invention has been described as having a preferred design, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/157,748, filed Jan. 17, 2014, which will issue as U.S. Pat. No. 8,979,588 on Mar. 17, 2015; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/432,969, filed Mar. 28, 2012, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,632,362 on Jan. 21, 2014; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/628,732, filed Dec. 1, 2009, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,167,661 on May 1, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/119,231, filed on Dec. 2, 2008, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4718867 | Seidel et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5030114 | Carey et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5044980 | Krumme et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5256086 | Ponn | Oct 1993 | A |
5259770 | Bates et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5277625 | Iannella et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5736910 | Townsend et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5772472 | Beutler et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6023200 | Rhee | Feb 2000 | A |
6270358 | Nozick | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6551139 | Yu | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6572411 | Aeschbacher et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585540 | Gutierrez et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6726492 | Yu | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7033210 | Laurer et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7083472 | Gordon et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7187766 | Hammond, Jr. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7273396 | Itano et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278879 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288001 | Aekins | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7361063 | Mullin et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7510438 | Hammond, Jr. et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7530854 | Aekins | May 2009 | B2 |
7549890 | Hashim | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7575482 | Pepe et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7726018 | Caveney | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771230 | Hammond, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7798857 | Hammond, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7824231 | Marti et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828603 | Ku et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7857667 | Wang | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7896692 | Gibson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7946894 | AbuGhazaleh et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7972150 | Lin | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7976349 | Heckmann | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7997926 | Hammond, Jr. et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8113884 | Matsuzaki et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8133077 | Okamoto | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8167661 | Straka et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8632362 | Straka | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8979588 | Straka et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20050207561 | Hammond, Jr. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060134995 | Bolouri-Saransar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060246784 | Aekins et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070111565 | Hashim | May 2007 | A1 |
20100041274 | Marti et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1041683 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1592097 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1020040044694 | May 2004 | KR |
1020050033649 | May 2006 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Explanation of attached drawings for applicant's Information Disclosure Statement and drawing of a foil shield that was used in communication jacks sold by Panduit at least as early as Nov. 2006 (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150188260 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61119231 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14157748 | Jan 2014 | US |
Child | 14657399 | US | |
Parent | 12628732 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13432969 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13432969 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14157748 | US |