Patent Grant
10196258
Hydraulic fracturing (also known as fracking) is a well-stimulation process that utilizes pressurized liquids to fracture rock formations. Pumps and other equipment used for hydraulic fracturing typically operate at the surface of the well site. The equipment may operate until refueling is needed, at which time the equipment may be shut-down for refueling. Shut-downs are costly and reduce efficiency. More preferably, to avoid shut-downs fuel is replenished in a hot-refueling operation while the equipment continues to run. This permits fracking operations to proceed continuously. However, hot-refueling can be difficult to reliably sustain for the duration of the fracking operation.
A system according to an example of the present disclosure includes at least one mobile fuel distribution station that has a mobile trailer, a pump, a manifold, a plurality of hoses, a plurality of detachably connectable fuel caps connected or connectable with the hoses, a plurality of valves, and a plurality of fuel level sensors. The mobile fuel distribution station is configured to operate the pump responsive to a low fuel threshold to provide fuel to the manifold, from the manifold to the valves, and from the valves through the hoses. At least one server is operable to communicate with at least one mobile fuel distribution station. The server is configured to receive fuel operating parameter data from the mobile fuel distribution station, determine whether the fuel operating parameter data is within a preset limit, and send a control action in response to the operating parameter data being outside the preset limit.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the fuel operating parameter data represents a change in a fuel operating parameter from a prior reading to a current reading.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the fuel operating parameter data represents at least one of a fuel temperature or a fuel pressure in the mobile fuel distribution station.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the at least one of the fuel temperature or the fuel pressure is from a location between the pump and the manifold in the mobile fuel distribution station.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the control action is selected from the group consisting of a shutdown instruction to the mobile fuel distribution station, an adjustment instruction to the mobile fuel distribution station, and an alert to an electronic device other than the mobile fuel distribution station.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the at least one mobile fuel distribution station comprises multiple of the fuel distribution stations.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the fuel operating parameter data represents a change in a fuel operating parameter from a prior reading to a current reading, and the fuel operating parameter data represents at least one of a fuel temperature or a fuel pressure in the mobile fuel distribution station.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the control action is selected from the group consisting of a shutdown instruction to the mobile fuel distribution station, an adjustment instruction to the mobile fuel distribution station, and an alert to an electronic device other than the mobile fuel distribution station.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the control action is a shutdown instruction to the mobile fuel distribution station.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the control action is an adjustment instruction to the mobile fuel distribution station.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the control action is an alert to an electronic device other than the mobile fuel distribution station.
A system according to an example of the present disclosure includes a plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations. Each mobile fuel distribution station has a mobile trailer, a pump, a manifold, a plurality of hoses, a plurality of detachably connectable fuel caps connected or connectable with the hoses, a plurality of valves, and a plurality of fuel level sensors. The mobile fuel distribution station is configured to operate the pump responsive to a low fuel threshold to provide fuel to the manifold, from the manifold to the valves, and from the valves through the hoses. At least one server configured to receive fuel operating parameter data from the plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations, and at least one electronic device other than the plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations. At least one electronic device is configured to communicate with at least one server and display the fuel operating parameter data of each of the plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the at least one electronic device is configured to send control actions to the plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations to change operation of one or more of the plurality of mobile distribution stations.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the control actions are based upon at least one of fuel temperature, fuel pressure, or fuel flow in one or more of the plurality of mobile distribution stations.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the control actions include shutdown instructions to stop one or more of the plurality of mobile distribution stations.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the control actions include adjustment instructions to change one or more fuel operating parameters or operating settings of one or more of the plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the at least one electronic device is configured to display in real-time the operating parameter data of each of the plurality of mobile distribution stations.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the at least one electronic device is configured to display an alert in response to the fuel operating parameter data being outside one or more preset limits.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the at least one electronic device is configured to display total amounts of fuel distributed by each of the plurality of mobile distribution stations.
A system according to an example of the present disclosure includes a plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations. Each mobile fuel distribution station has a mobile trailer, a pump, a manifold, a plurality of hoses, a plurality of detachably connectable fuel caps connected or connectable with the hoses, a plurality of valves, and a plurality of fuel level sensors. The mobile fuel distribution station is configured to operate the pump responsive to a low fuel threshold to provide fuel to the manifold, from the manifold to the valves, and from the valves through the hoses. At least one server is configured to receive fuel operating parameter data from the plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations. At least one electronic device other than the plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations is configured to communicate with at least one server and display the fuel operating parameter data of one or more of the plurality of mobile fuel distribution stations. The fuel operating parameter data represents a change in a fuel operating parameter from a prior reading to a current reading. The fuel operating parameter data represents at least one of a fuel temperature or a fuel pressure in the mobile fuel distribution stations, and the control action is selected from the group consisting of a shutdown instruction to the mobile fuel distribution station, an adjustment instruction to the mobile fuel distribution station, and an alert to an electronic device other than the mobile fuel distribution station.
The various features and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
In this example, the station 20 includes a mobile trailer 22. Generally, the mobile trailer 22 is elongated and has first and second opposed trailer side walls W1 and W2 that join first and second opposed trailer end walls E1 and E2. Most typically, the trailer 22 will also have a closed top (not shown). The mobile trailer 22 may have wheels that permit the mobile trailer 22 to be moved by a vehicle from site to site to service different hot-refueling operations. In this example, the mobile trailer 22 has two compartments. A first compartment 24 includes the physical components for distributing fuel, such as diesel fuel, and a second compartment 26 serves as an isolated control room for managing and monitoring fuel distribution. The compartments 24/26 are separated by an inside wall 28a that has an inside door 28b.
The first compartment 24 includes one or more pumps 30. Fuel may be provided to the one or more pumps 30 from an external fuel source, such as a tanker truck on the site. On the trailer 22, the one or more pumps 30 are fluidly connected via a fuel line 32 with a high precision register 34 for metering fuel. The fuel line 32 may include, but is not limited to, hard piping. In this example, the fuel line 32 includes a filtration and air eliminator system 36a and one or more sensors 36b. Although optional, the system 36a is beneficial in many implementations, to remove foreign particles and air from the fuel prior to delivery to the equipment. The one or more sensors 36b may include a temperature sensor, a pressure sensor, or a combination thereof, which assist in fuel distribution management.
The fuel line 32 is connected with one or more manifolds 38. In the illustrated example, the station 20 includes two manifolds 38 that are arranged on opposed sides of the compartment 24. As an example, the manifolds 38 are elongated tubes that are generally larger in diameter than the fuel line 32 and that have at least one inlet and multiple outlets. Each hose 40 is wound, at least initially, on a reel 42 that is rotatable to extend or retract the hose 40 externally through one or more windows of the trailer 22. Each reel 42 may have an associated motor to mechanically extend and retract the hose 40.
As shown in an isolated view in
As shown in a representative example in
In the illustrated example, the first compartment 24 also includes a sensor support rack 48. The sensor support rack 48 holds integrated fuel cap sensors 50 (when not in use), or at least portions thereof. When in use, each integrated fuel cap sensor 50 is temporarily affixed to a piece of equipment (i.e., the fuel tank of the equipment) that is subject to the hot-refueling operation. Each hose 40 may include a connector end 40a and each integrated fuel cap sensor 50 may have a corresponding mating connector to facilitate rapid connection and disconnection of the hose 40 with the integrated fuel cap sensor 50. For example, the connector end 40a and mating connector on the integrated fuel cap sensor 50 form a hydraulic quick-connect.
At least the control valves 44, pump or pumps 30, sensor or sensors 36b, and register 34 are in communication with a controller 52 located in the second compartment 26. As an example, the controller 52 includes software, hardware, or both that is configured to carry out any of the functions described herein. In one further example, the controller 52 includes a programmable logic controller with a touch-screen for user input and display of status data. For example, the screen may simultaneously show multiple fluid levels of the equipment that is being serviced.
When in operation, the integrated fuel cap sensors 50 are mounted on respective fuel tanks of the pieces of equipment that are subject to the hot-refueling operation. The hoses 40 are connected to the respective integrated fuel cap sensors 50. Each integrated fuel cap sensor 50 generates signals that are indicative of the fuel level in the fuel tank of the piece of equipment on which the integrated fuel cap sensor 50 is mounted. The signals are communicated to the controller 52.
The controller 52 interprets the signals and determines the fuel level for each fuel tank of each piece of equipment. In response to a fuel level that falls below a lower threshold, the controller 52 opens the control valve 44 associated with the hose 40 to that fuel tank and activates the pump or pumps 30. The pump or pumps 30 provide fuel flow into the manifolds 38 and through the open control valve 44 and reel 42 such that fuel is provided through the respective hose 40 and integrated fuel cap sensor 50 into the fuel tank. The lower threshold may correspond to an empty fuel level of the fuel tank, but more typically the lower threshold will be a level above the empty level to reduce the potential that the equipment completely runs out of fuel and shuts down. The controller 52 can also be programmed with a failsafe measure related to the operation of the fuel cap sensors 50. As an example, once a control valve 44 is open, if the controller 52 does not detect a change in fuel level from the fuel cap sensor 50 associated with the control valve 44 within a preset time period, the controller 52 shuts the pump 30 off and closes the control valve 44. Thus, if a hose 40 were to rupture, spillage of fuel is limited to the volume of fuel in the hose 40. For instance, the preset time period may be three seconds, six seconds, ten seconds, or fifteen seconds, which may limit spillage to approximately fifteen gallons for a given size of hose.
The controller 52 also determines when the fuel level in the fuel tank reaches an upper threshold. The upper threshold may correspond to a full fuel level of the fuel tank, but more typically the upper threshold will be a level below the full level to reduce the potential for overflow. In response to reaching the upper threshold, the controller 52 closes the respective control valve 44 and ceases the pump or pumps 30. If other control valves 44 are open or are to be opened, the pump or pumps 30 may remain on. The controller 52 can also be programmed with an electronic stop failsafe measure to prevent over-filling. As an example, once an upper threshold is reached on a first tank and the control valve 44 is closed, but the pump 30 is otherwise to remain on to fill other tanks, if the fuel level continues to rise in the first tank, the controller 52 shuts the pump 30 off.
Multiple control valves 44 may be open at one time, to provide fuel to multiple fuel tanks at one time. Alternatively, if there is demand for fuel from two or more fuel tanks, the controller 52 may sequentially open the control valves 44 such that the tanks are refueled sequentially. For instance, upon completion of refueling of one fuel tank, the controller 52 closes the control valve 44 of the hose 40 associated with that tank and then opens the next control valve 44 to begin refueling the next fuel tank. Sequential refueling may facilitate maintaining internal pressure in the manifold and fuel line 32 above a desired or preset pressure threshold to more rapidly deliver fuel. Similarly, the controller 52 may limit the number of control valves 44 that are open at any one instance in order to maintain the internal pressure in the manifold and fuel line 32 above a desired or preset threshold. The controller 52 may perform the functions above while in an automated operating mode. Additionally, the controller 52 may have a manual mode in which a user can control at least some functions through the PLC, such as starting and stopped the pump 30 and opening and closing control valves 44. For example, manual mode may be used at the beginning of a job when initially filling tanks to levels at which the fuel cap sensors 50 can detect fuel and/or during a job if a fuel cap sensor 50 becomes inoperable. Of course, operating in manual mode may deactivate some automated functions, such as filling at the low threshold or stopping at the high threshold.
In addition to the use of the sensor signals to determine fuel level, or even as an alternative to use of the sensor signals, the refueling may be time-based. For instance, the fuel consumption of a given piece of equipment may be known such that the fuel tank reaches the lower threshold at known time intervals. The controller 52 is operable to refuel the fuel tank at the time intervals rather than on the basis of the sensor signals, although sensor signals may also be used to verify fuel level.
The controller 52 also tracks the amount of fuel provided to the fuel tanks. For instance, the register 34 precisely measures the amount of fuel provided from the pump or pumps 30. As an example, the register 34 is an electronic register and has a resolution of about 0.1 gallons. The register 34 communicates measurement data to the controller 52. The controller 52 can thus determine the total amount of fuel used to very precise levels. The controller 52 may also be configured to provide outputs of the total amount of fuel consumed. For instance, a user may program the controller 52 to provide outputs at desired intervals, such as by worker shifts or daily, weekly, or monthly periods. The outputs may also be used to generate invoices for the amount of fuel used. As an example, the controller 52 may provide a daily output of fuel use and trigger the generation of an invoice that corresponds to the daily fuel use, thereby enabling almost instantaneous invoicing.
In a further example, the integrated fuel cap sensors 50 are each hard-wired to the controller 52. The term “hard-wired” or variations thereof refers to a wired connection between two components that serves for electronic communication there between, which here is a sensor and a controller. The hard-wiring may facilitate providing more reliable signals from the integrated fuel cap sensors 50. For instance, the many pieces of equipment, vehicles, workers, etc. at a site may communicate using wireless devices. The wireless signals may interfere with each other and, therefore, degrade communication reliability. Hard-wiring the integrated fuel cap sensors 50 to the controller 52 facilitates reduction in interference and thus enhances reliability.
In general, hard-wiring in a hot-refueling environment presents several challenges. For example, a site has many workers walking about and typically is located on rough terrain. Thus, as will be described below, each integrated fuel cap sensor 50 is hard-wired through the associated hose 40 to the controller 52.
A plurality of sensor communication lines 66 (one shown) are routed with or in the respective hoses 40. For instance, each line 66 may include a wire, a wire bundle, and/or multiple wires or wire bundles. In one further example, the line 66 is a low milli-amp intrinsic safety wiring, which serves as a protection feature for reducing the concern for operating electrical equipment in the presence of fuel by limiting the amount of thermal and electrical energy available for ignition. In this example, the line 66 is routed through the hose 40 between (radially) the tube 62 and the sleeve 64. The sleeve 64 thus serves to secure and protect the line 66, and the sleeve 64 may limit spill and spewing if there is a hose 40 rupture. In particular, since the line 66 is secured in the hose 40, the line 66 does not present a tripping concern for workers. Moreover, in rough terrain environments where there are stones, sand, and other objects that could damage the line 66 if it were free, the sleeve 64 shields the line 66 from direct contact with such objects. In further examples, the line 66 may be embedded or partially embedded in the tube 62 or the sleeve 64.
In this example, the line 66 extends out from the end of the hose 40 and includes a connector 68 that is detachably connectable with a respective one of the integrated fuel cap sensors 50. For example,
The sensor 50d may be any type of sensor that is capable of detecting fluid or fuel level in a tank. In one example, the sensor 50d is a guided wave radar sensor. A guided wave radar sensor may include a transmitter/sensor that emits radar waves, most typically radio frequency waves, down a probe. A sheath may be provided around the probe. For example, the sheath may be a metal alloy (e.g., stainless steel or aluminum) or polymer tube that surrounds the probe. One or more bushings may be provided between the probe and the sheath, to separate the probe from the sheath. The sheath shields the probe from contact by external objects, the walls of a fuel tank, or other components in a fuel tank, which might otherwise increase the potential for faulty sensor readings. The probe serves as a guide for the radar waves. The radar waves reflect off of the surface of the fuel and the reflected radar waves are received into the transmitter/sensor. A sensor controller determines the “time of flight” of the radar waves, i.e., how long it takes from emission of the radar waves for the radar waves to reflect back to the transmitter/sensor. Based on the time, the sensor controller, or the controller 52 if the sensor controller does not have the capability, determines the distance that the radar waves travel. A longer distance thus indicates a lower fuel level (farther away) and a shorter distance indicates a higher fuel level (closer).
The line 66 routes through the hose 40 and back to the reel 42 in the trailer 22. For example, the line 66 is also routed or hard-wired through the reel 42 to the controller 52.
The lines 66a may converge to one or more communication junction blocks or “bricks” prior to the controller 52. The communication junction blocks may serve to facilitate the relay of the signals back to the controller 52. The communication junction blocks may alternatively or additionally serve to facilitate identification of the lines 66, and thus the signals, with respect to which of the hoses a particular line 66 is associated with. For instance, a group of communication junction blocks may have unique identifiers and the lines 66 into a particular communication junction block may be associated with identifiers. A signal relayed into the controller 52 may thus be associated with the identifiers of the communication junction blocks and a particular line 66 of that communication junction block in order to identify which hose 40 the signal is to be associated with. The valves 44 may also communicate with the controller 52 in a similar manner through the communication junction blocks.
As can be appreciated from the examples herein, the station 20 permits continuous hot-refueling with enhanced reliability. While there might generally be a tendency to choose wireless sensor communication for convenience, a hard-wired approach mitigates the potential for signal interference that can arise with wireless. Moreover, by hard-wiring the sensors through the hoses to the controller, wired communication lines are protected from exposure and do not pose additional concerns for workers on a site.
The server 71 may include hardware, software, or both that is configured to perform the functions described herein. The server 71 may also be in communication with one or more electronic devices 73. The electronic device 73 is external of or remote from the mobile fuel distribution stations 20. For example, the electronic device 73 may be, but is not limited to, a computer, such as a desktop or laptop computer, a cellular device, or tablet device. The electronic device 73 may communicate and interact in the system 69 via data connectivity, which may involve internet connectivity, cellular connectivity, software, mobile application, or combinations of these.
The electronic device 73 may include a display 73a, such as an electronic screen, that is configured to display the fuel operating parameter data of each of the mobile distribution stations 20. As an example, the electronic device 73 may display in real-time the operating parameter data of each of the mobile distribution stations 20 in the system 69 to permit remote monitoring and management control of the mobile distribution stations 20. For instance, the operating parameter data may include fuel temperature, fuel pressure, fuel flow, total amount of fuel distributed, operational settings (e.g., low and high fuel level thresholds), or other parameters.
The server 71 may also be in communication with one or more cloud-based devices 75. The cloud-based device 75 may include one or more servers and a memory for communicating with and storing information from the server 71.
The server 71 is configured to communicate with the mobile distribution stations 20. Most typically, the server 71 will communicate with the controller 52 of the mobile distribution station 20. In this regard, the controller 52 of each mobile distribution station 20 may be include hardware, software, or both that is configured for external communication with the server 71. For example, each controller 52 may communicate and interact in the system 69 via data connectivity, which may involve internet connectivity, cellular connectivity, software, mobile application, or combinations of these.
The server 71 is configured to receive operating parameter data from the mobile distribution stations 20. The operating parameter data may include or represent physical measurements of operating conditions of the mobile distribution station 20, status information of the mobile distribution station 20, setting information of the mobile distribution station 20, or other information associated with control or management of the operation of the mobile distribution station 20.
For example, the server 71 utilizes the information to monitor and auto-manage the mobile distribution station 20. The monitoring and auto-management may be for purposes of identifying potential risk conditions that may require shutdown or alert, purposes of intelligently enhancing operation, or purposes of reading fuel or fluid levels in real-time via the sensors 50. As an example, the server 71 may utilize the information to monitor or display fuel or fluid levels, or determine whether the fuel operating parameter data is within a preset limit and send a control action in response to the operating parameter data being outside the preset limit. As will described in further detail below, the control action may be a shutdown instruction to the mobile fuel distribution stations 20, an adjustment instruction to the mobile fuel distribution stations 20, or an alert to the electronic device 73.
Referring to
In this example, the current operating parameter is compared with a prior operating parameter stored in memory in the controller 52. A difference in the current operating parameter and the prior operating parameter is calculated to produce a change (delta) value in the operating parameter. The change value is used as the operating parameter data for control purposes in the method 77. The operating parameter data thus represents the change in the operating parameter from the prior reading to the current reading. Use of the change value as the operating parameter data serves to reduce the amount of data that is to be sent in connection with the method 77. For example, the actual operating parameter values may be larger than the change values and may thus require more memory and bandwidth to send than the change values. The change values are sampled and calculated at a predesignated interval rate. In this example, the interval rate is once per second. Each operating parameter is stored in memory for use as the next “prior” operating parameter for comparison with a subsequent “new” operating parameter reading. The controller 52 may be programmed to perform the above steps. As will be appreciated, the steps above achieve data efficiency, and actual values could alternatively or additionally be used if memory and bandwidth permit.
Each operating parameter data reading (i.e., change value) is published or sent via IoT (Internet of Things) Gateway to an IoT Platform, which may be implemented fully or partially on the server 71 and cloud device 75. The operating parameter data may also contain additional information, such as but not limited to, metadata with time stamp information and identification of the individual mobile distribution station 20. In this example, the operating parameter data of interest is associated with fuel pressure and fuel temperature. In the method 77, the operating parameter data for fuel temperature and fuel pressure are compared to, respectively, a preset fuel temperature shutdown limit and a preset fuel pressure shutdown limit. The shutdown limits may be temperature and pressure limits corresponding to rated limits of the pump 30, fuel line 32, and manifold 38, for example.
If the temperature or pressure are outside of the preset fuel temperature or pressure shutdown limits, the method 77 initiates a shutdown event. In this example, the shutdown event includes identifying the particular mobile distribution station 20 associated with the temperature or pressure that is outside of the preset limit, forming a shutdown instruction message, and publishing or sending the shutdown instruction message via the IoT Gateway to the corresponding identified mobile distribution station 20.
Upon receiving the shutdown instruction message, the controller 52 of the identified mobile distribution station 20 validates and executes the shutdown instruction. For instance, shutdown may include shutting off the pump 30 and closing all of the control valves 44. In this example, the method 77 includes a timing feature that waits for confirmation of shutdown. Confirmation may be generated by the controller 52 performing an electronic check of whether the pump 30 is off and the control valves 44 are closed. Confirmation may additionally or alternatively involve manual feedback via input into the controller 52 by a worker at the identified mobile distribution station 20.
Once shutdown is confirmed by the controller 52, confirmation of shutdown is published or sent via the Iot Gateway to the IoT Platform for subsequent issuance of an alert. If there is no confirmation of shutdown by a maximum preset time threshold, a non-confirmation of shutdown is published or sent for subsequent issuance of an alert.
If the temperature and/or pressure is not outside of the preset fuel temperature or pressure shutdown limits, the method 77 in this example continues to determine whether the fuel temperature and fuel pressure with are, respectively, outside of a preset fuel temperature threshold limit and a preset fuel pressure threshold limit. The threshold limits will typically be preset at levels which indicate a potential for shutdown conditions. For example, the threshold limits may be intermediate temperature or pressure levels which, if exceeded, may indicate an upward trend in temperature or pressure toward the shutdown limits. In one example, the threshold limits are rate of change thresholds. For instance, a change value in temperature and/or pressure that exceeds a corresponding threshold change limit may be indicative that temperature and/or pressure is rapidly elevating toward the shutdown condition.
In response to the temperature and/or pressure being outside of the preset fuel temperature or pressure threshold limits, the method 77 initiates an alert event. In this example, the alert event includes initiating an event notification. In the event notification, the method 77 conducts a lookup of notification channels and then issues an alert via one or more selected notification channels, such as an alert on the display 73a. As an example, the notification channels may be selected by user preferences and may include alerts by email, SMS (short message service), and/or mobile device app notification (e.g., banners, badges, home screen alerts, etc.). The event notification is also used for alerts of confirmation and non-confirmation of shutdown. The method 77 thus provides capability to nearly instantaneously issue an alert that can be immediately and readily viewed in real-time on the electronic device 73 so that appropriate action, if needed, can be taken. In one example, such actions may include adjustment of operation settings of the mobile distribution station 20, which may be communicated and implemented via the system 69 from the electronic device 73 to the mobile distribution station 20.
Efficiency Score=Safety Score×(Temperature Score+Pressure Score+Flow Rate Score+Tank Level Score). Equation I:
In one example, the safety score is a product of a safety factor and logic values of one or zero for each of the temperature score, the pressure score, the flow rate score, and the tank level score. Thus, if any of the temperature score, the pressure score, the flow rate score, or the tank level score fails, resulting in a logic value of zero, the efficiency score will be zero. In response to an efficiency score of zero, the method 79 initiates the shutdown event as described above. The logic values are assigned according to whether the given parameter is within a predetermined minimum/maximum range. If the parameter is within the range, the logic value is one and if the parameter is outside of the range, the value is zero. As an example, the safety score may be determined by:
Safety Score=(Safety Check Positive Response/Total Safety Checks)*(IF (Temperature Reading between MIN LIMIT and MAX LIMIT) THEN 1 ELSE 0))*(IF (Pressure Reading between MIN LIMIT and MAX LIMIT) THEN 1 ELSE 0))*(IF (Flow Rate Reading between MIN LIMIT and MAX LIMIT) THEN 1 ELSE 0))*(IF (Tank Inventory Reading between MIN LIMIT and MAX LIMIT) THEN 1 ELSE 0)),
wherein
Temperature Score=(((Temperature Reading−Min Limit)/Temperature Reading)+((Max Limit+Temperature Reading)/Temperature Reading)))/2,
Pressure Score=(((Pressure Reading−Min Limit)/Pressure Reading)+((Max Limit+Pressure Reading)/Pressure Reading)))/2,
Flow Rate Score=(((Flow Rate Reading−Min Limit)/Flow Rate Reading)+((Max Limit+Flow Rate Reading)/Flow Rate Reading)))/2, and
Tank Level Score=(((Tank Level Reading−Min Limit)/Tank Level Reading)+((Max Limit+Tank Level Reading)/Tank Level Reading)))/2.
In one example, the safety factor includes a calculation based on safety checks of a mobile distribution station 20. For instance, the safety factor is the quotient of positive or passing safety checks divided by the total number of safety check made. A safety check may involve periodic validation of multiple parameters or conditions on the site of a station 20 and/or in the station 20. As examples, the safety check may include validation that electrical power supply is fully functional (e.g., a generator), validation of oil levels (e.g., in a generator), validation of whether there are any work obstructions at the site, etc. Thus, each safety check may involve validation of a set of parameters and conditions. If validation passes, the safety check is positive and if validation does not pass the safety check is negative. As an example, if 5 safety checks are conducted for a station 20 and four of the checks pass and one does not pass, the safety factor is equal to four divided by five, or 0.8.
The method 79 also uses the efficiency score to actively intelligently auto-manage operation of one or more of the mobile distribution stations 20. For example, the efficiency score is compared in the method 79 with an efficiency score threshold limit or efficiency score range. If the efficiency score is outside of the limit or range, the method 79 initiates an adjustment event to adjust settings of the operating parameters of the mobile distribution station 20. For example, pumping rate or power may be changed to increase or decrease fuel pressure. In further examples in the table below, preset actions are taken in response to efficiency scores within preset ranges.
The adjustment event may include forming an adjustment instruction message and publishing or sending the adjustment instruction message to the mobile distribution station 20 via the IoT Gateway. Upon receiving the adjustment instruction message the controller 52 of the mobile distribution station 20 validates and executes the message. The message constitutes a control action to change one or more of the operating parameters to move the efficiency score within the limit or range. As an example, pumping rate is changed to change fuel pressure. Other parameters may additionally or alternatively be adjusted to change the fuel efficiency score, such as but not limited to, fuel tank upper and lower thresholds, sequence of opening/closing control valves 44, and number of control valves 44 that may be open at one time. Thus, once implemented, the method 79 can serve to auto-adjust operation of one or more of the mobile distribution stations 20, without human intervention, to achieve enhanced or optimize fuel distribution.
In one example, a rate of fuel consumption of one or more pieces of the equipment may be calculated, and the upper and/or lower fuel level threshold settings are changed in response to the calculated rate of fuel consumption. For instance, if consumption is lower or higher than a given fuel level threshold setting warrants, the fuel level threshold setting is responsively auto-adjusted up or down for more efficient operation. For a low consumption rate, there may be a downward adjustment of the lower fuel level threshold, since there is lower likelihood that the low consumption rate will lead to a fully empty condition in the equipment. Similarly, for a high consumption rate, there may be an upward adjustment of the lower fuel level threshold, since there is higher likelihood that the high consumption rate will lead to a fully empty condition in the equipment. Thus, the mobile distribution station 20 can be operated more efficiently and safely by distributing fuel at proper times to ensure filling the equipment with desired safety margins.
Similar to the shutdown instruction message described above, the method 79 may include a timing feature that waits for confirmation of adjustment. Once adjustment is confirmed by the controller 52, confirmation of adjustment is published or sent via the Iot Gateway to the IoT Platform for subsequent issuance of an alert. If there is no confirmation of adjustment by a maximum preset time threshold, a non-confirmation of adjustment is published or sent for subsequent issuance of an alert. In further examples, the method 79 may exclude use of the efficiency score for purposes of shutdown or for purposes of intelligent auto-management. That is, the method 79 may employ the efficiency score for only one or the other of shutdown or intelligent auto-management.
Additionally or alternatively, the system 69 with one or more mobile distribution stations 20 and one or more servers may be used for centralized, intelligent auto-filling. For example, fuel levels may be tracked in real-time or near real-time. When a fuel level associated with one of the stations 20 reaches the lower threshold, described above, an instruction may be sent via the system 69 to active the pump 30 and open the appropriate control valve 44. Moreover, the system 69 can ensure that there is minimal or zero delay time from the time of identifying the low threshold to the time that filling begins. Thus, at least a portion of the functionality of the controllers 52 may be remotely and centrally based in the server of the system 69.
Although a combination of features is shown in the illustrated examples, not all of them need to be combined to realize the benefits of various embodiments of this disclosure. In other words, a system designed according to an embodiment of this disclosure will not necessarily include all of the features shown in any one of the Figures or all of the portions schematically shown in the Figures. Moreover, selected features of one example embodiment may be combined with selected features of other example embodiments.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from this disclosure. The scope of legal protection given to this disclosure can only be determined by studying the following claims.
The present disclosure is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/290,264, filed Oct. 11, 2016.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2340070 | McCauley et al. | Jan 1944 | A |
| 2516150 | Samiran | Jul 1950 | A |
| 2769572 | Harman et al. | Nov 1956 | A |
| 2777461 | Wildhaber | Jan 1957 | A |
| 2966921 | Whiteman | Jan 1961 | A |
| 3028010 | Headrick | Apr 1962 | A |
| 3136295 | Gramo | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3547141 | Alexander | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3605798 | Green et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3618643 | Thomson | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3625399 | Heisler | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3677284 | Mendez | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3881509 | Newton | May 1975 | A |
| 4139019 | Bresie et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4284210 | Horak | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4511311 | Olson | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4591115 | DeCarlo | May 1986 | A |
| 4651788 | Grosskreuz et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4728005 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4930665 | Devine | Jun 1990 | A |
| 5406988 | Hopkins | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5454408 | DiBella et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5465766 | Siegele et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5503199 | Whitley, II et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5538051 | Brown et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5551309 | Goossens et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5651400 | Corts et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5660358 | Grafwallner et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5708424 | Orlando et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5749339 | Graham et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5927603 | McNabb | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5884675 | Krasnov | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6098646 | Hennemann et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6206056 | Lagache | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6564615 | Carter | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6601000 | Barlian et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6651706 | Litt | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6697705 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6755225 | Niedwiecki et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6761194 | Blong | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6779569 | Teer, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6786245 | Eichelberger et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 7063276 | Newton | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7106026 | Moore | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7353808 | Kakoo | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7415995 | Plummer et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7458543 | Cutler et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7568507 | Farese et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7602143 | Capizzo | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7628182 | Poulter | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7937215 | Humphrey | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7938151 | Hockner | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8055526 | Blagg | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8448750 | Gaugush et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8684028 | Perez | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 9346662 | Van Vliet et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9371830 | Moffitt, Jr. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9371831 | Moffitt, Jr. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9586805 | Shock | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 20010017815 | Ackermann et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20050109561 | Chopra | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20070079891 | Farese et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070164031 | Holz | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070181212 | Fell | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080230146 | Kastner | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20110197988 | Van Vliet et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20160076533 | Moffitt, Jr. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1147397 | Apr 1963 | DE |
| 20106400 | Oct 2001 | DE |
| 10309307 | Sep 2004 | DE |
| 102006025025 | Dec 2006 | DE |
| 102006038652 | Feb 2008 | DE |
| 0161042 | Nov 1985 | EP |
| 0433041 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 2485832 | May 2012 | GB |
| 28347 | Mar 2003 | RU |
| 91135 | Jan 2010 | RU |
| 2452668 | Jan 2012 | RU |
| 949644 | Aug 1982 | SU |
| 0177006 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| 03029721 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| 03093118 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2006005686 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| 2006116572 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2007087849 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2008083830 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2009026607 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 20090608065 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Oilfield Business: Technologies. Frac Shack Inc. introduces world's first Bi-Fuel Distribution Unit for hydraulic fracturing industry. Texas Oil & Gas: The National Magazine for Oil & Gas in Texas. vol. 4, Issue 2. 2015. p. 27. |
| Frac Shack International. Publications & Endorsements. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Frac Shack International. Technology. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Frac Shack International. Design Benefits. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Frac Shack International. Service. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Frac Shack International. Frac Shack Series—Series A. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Frac Shack International. Frac Shack Series—Series B. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Frac Shack International. Frac Shack Series—Series C. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Frac Shack International. Frac Shack Series—Series D. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Frac Shack International. Frac Shack Series—Series E. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Frac Shack International. Frac Shack Series—Series EG. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.fracshack.com. |
| Mann Tek. Dry Disconnect Couplings. Retrieved Jul. 22, 2016 from: http://www.manntek.com/products/drydisconnectcouplings p. 1-4. |
| Mann Tek. Dry Aviation Couplings. Retrieved Jul. 22, 2016 from: http://www.manntek.com/products/dryaviationcouplings p. 1-4. |
| Water, J. (2013). Better Safe than Sorry: Frac Shack a welcome addition to the oil patch. Jan. 2, 2013. Retrieved Aug. 23, 2016 from: http://www.pipelinenewsnorth.ca/better-safe-than-sorry-1.1123066. |
| Shimazaki, H. (1986). Development of centralized fueling and management system of kerosene heating machine. Nisseki Technical Review, vol. 28(4). Jul. 1986. pp. 184-188. |
| Technical Document. Surface vehicle standard. SAE International. Sep. 2014. pp. 1-5. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180099855 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15290264 | Oct 2016 | US |
| Child | 15782335 | US |
