Method and system for navigating a catheter probe in the presence of field-influencing objects

Description

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

Not Applicable

REFERENCE TO MICROFICHE APPENDIX

Not Applicable

CONCURRENTLY FILED APPLICATIONS

The following United States patent applications, which were concurrently filed with this one on Oct. 28, 1999, are fully incorporated herein by reference: Patient-shielding and Coil System, by Michael Martinelli, Paul Kessman and Brad Jascob; Navigation Information Overlay onto Ultrasound Imagery, by Paul Kessman, Troy Holsing and Jason Trobaugh; Coil Structures and Methods for Generating Magnetic Fields, by Brad Jascob, Paul Kessman and Michael Martinelli; Registration of Human Anatomy Integrated for Electromagnetic Localization, by Mark W. Hunter and Paul Kessman; System for Translation of Electromagnetic and Optical Localization Systems, by Mark W. Hunter and Paul Kessman; Surgical Communication and Power System, by Mark W. Hunter, Paul Kessman and Brad Jascob; and Surgical Sensor, by Mark W. Hunter, Sheri McCoid and Paul Kessman.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to a navigation system for medical devices based on the use of magnetic fields. More particularly, this invention relates to a method and system for determining the position and orientation of a catheter probe being used during a surgical procedure in the presence of extraneous objects that may introduce extraneous magnetic fields.

Systems and methods for determining the position and orientation of surgical probes based on the use of magnetic fields are known. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,939, herein incorporated by reference. Such systems and methods generally rely on the ability to solve a known equation for a known field strength in order to obtain the unknown position and orientation variables. Although the focus here is a rigid catheter probe of known length, width and depth, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the techniques discussed here are equally applicable to other types of probes; for example, the techniques discussed here may be adapted to the use of a flexible probe.

In general, if the position in three-dimensional space of two points within the rigid probe is known, then the position and orientation of the probe itself is known. Each unknown point P in space corresponds to three unknown variables as shown in FIG. 1. These variables can be what are commonly called x, y, and z in a Cartesian system as is shown in FIG. 1, or they can be the variables r, θ, and φ as are commonly used in spherical coordinates also as shown in FIG. 1. Two unknown points in space correspond to 6 unknown variables. However, when the two points are on a rigid catheter, and when the separation of the two points is known, one unknown variable is removed. Thus, the position and orientation of a rigid catheter probe in three-dimensions is a function of 5 unknown variables. These variables can be expressed in a form that utilizes both Cartesian and spherical coordinates. For example, the position of sensor coil 14 can be defined by three Cartesian coordinates x, y, and z as is shown in FIG. 2, and the orientation of sensor coil 14 along coil axis 21 is defined by the variables θ and φ, also as shown in FIG. 2.

In order to solve for 5 unknown quantities, one typically requires 5 known linearly independent equations. One can obtain known equations that are linearly independent of each other by exposing a detector located on the catheter in an unknown position and orientation to known independent navigation fields. Thus, to obtain 5 known linearly independent equations requires a sampling of at least 5 known independent navigation fields. Nevertheless, current systems that utilize magnetic fields in order to determine position and orientation frequently sample more than 5 independent fields. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,939, herein incorporated by reference. One of the reasons for sampling more than 5 independent fields is to perform a self-consistency check. Ideally, every sampling above 5 should provide such a system with redundant information regarding position and orientation. However, in an operating room in practice, every sampling of a known navigation field beyond 5 yields slightly different results as to the position or orientation of the catheter probe. One of the reasons for this is the nearby presence extraneous objects that are conductive or ferromagnetic. Such objects respond to the known navigation field and introduce errors that can be large depending on the nature and relative position of the object.

For example, a conducting object within the area of influence of the known navigation field can develop what is known as an eddy current in response to the known navigation field. These eddy currents can, in turn, generate an extraneous magnetic field of unknown strength and orientation in the vicinity of the catheter. Depending upon the size of the object, this effect can be large.

In addition, an object with a ferromagnetic core will act to focus magnetic field flux lines through the core and thus distort the known navigation field, again, in an unknown manner. Often, objects with ferromagnetic and conductive cores are used in surgical settings, such as tools used to drill, ream and tap holes in the vertebrae of a patient.

In light of the foregoing, it is desirable to account for the effects of conducting objects that introduce eddy currents in response to a known navigation field.

It is further desirable to account for the effects of objects with ferromagnetic and conductive cores that introduce fluctuations in a known navigation field and that are often moved about near the periphery of the navigation field, such as surgical tools.

It is further desirable to account for the effects of objects that introduce arbitrary fluctuations in a known navigation field.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The foregoing and other objects are achieved by the invention which in one aspect comprises a correction system for determining the effect of an interfering object on a field sensor within a navigational domain. The system includes a first transmitter configured to project, into the navigational domain, field energy in a first waveform sufficient to induce a first signal value in the field sensor, where the first signal value is influenced by the interfering object. The system further includes a second transmitter configured to project, into the navigational domain, field energy in a second waveform sufficient to induce a second signal value in the field sensor, where the second signal value is also influenced by the interfering object. The system further includes a signal processor configured to receive the first signal value and the second signal value, and to determine the influences of the interfering object on the field sensor, to thereby permit a substantially precise location of the field sensor to be determined despite the presence of the interfering object.

In another embodiment of the invention, the field energy is magnetic field energy.

In another embodiment of the invention, the interfering object is an electrically conductive object.

In another embodiment of the invention, the field sensor includes an electrically conductive sensing coil.

In another embodiment of the invention, the first waveform is a sinusoidal waveform at a first frequency, and the second waveform is a sinusoidal waveform at a second frequency.

In another embodiment of the invention, the first transmitter and the second transmitter include three unidirectional coil sets, where each set is driven by a drive unit capable of driving the unidirectional coil set at the first frequency and at the second frequency. Further, the first and second transmitters include six delta coil sets, where each the set is driven by a drive unit capable of driving the delta coil set at the first frequency and the second frequency. In this embodiment, the three unidirectional coil sets and the six delta coils sets produce the field energy at the first and second frequencies.

In another embodiment of the invention, the three unidirectional coil sets include a first unidirectional coil set oriented so as to produce a substantially uniform amplitude field directed in an x direction, a second unidirectional coil set oriented so as to produce a substantially uniform amplitude field directed in a y direction, and a third unidirectional coil set oriented so as to produce a substantially uniform amplitude field directed in a z direction. In this embodiment, the x, y and z directions are substantially mutually orthogonal.

In another embodiment of the invention, the first unidirectional coil set has a first coil pair including a first coil element and a second coil element, and a second coil pair including a third coil element and a fourth coil element. The first coil element and the third coil element are disposed in a major surface of a platform, the second coil element is disposed in a first lateral wall of the platform, and the fourth coil element is disposed in a second lateral wall of the platform. In this embodiment, the first lateral wall and the second lateral wall are substantially normal to the major surface and substantially parallel to one another.

In another embodiment of the invention, the second unidirectional coil set has a first coil element and a second coil element disposed within a platform. The coil elements are spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another.

In another embodiment of the invention, the third unidirectional coil set has a first coil pair including a first coil element and a second coil element, and a second coil pair including a third coil element and a fourth coil element. The first coil element and the third coil element are disposed in a major surface of a platform, the second coil element is disposed in a first lateral wall of the platform, and the fourth coil element is disposed in a second lateral wall of the platform. In this embodiment, the first lateral wall and the second lateral wall are substantially normal to the major surface, and substantially parallel to one another.

In another embodiment of the invention, the six delta coil sets include a first pair of coil elements, a second pair of coil elements, and a third pair of coil elements. The coil elements are disposed so as to be substantially mutually coplanar within a major surface of a platform.

In another embodiment of the invention, each of the pairs of coil elements includes a long coil and a short coil, and the pairs of coils are disposed at equal angles on a circle about an axis extending substantially perpendicular to the major surface. In this embodiment, for each of the pairs of coils, a radius of the circle extends perpendicular to a direction of elongation of the pair, proceeding from the long coil to the short coil.

In another embodiment of the invention, each of the pairs of coil elements further includes at least one compensation coil, constructed and arranged to modify at least one termination point of the coil elements, so as to provide relatively a high spatial field gradient along two orthogonal axes, and substantially zero field amplitude along a third orthogonal axis.

In another embodiment of the invention, the signal processor includes a first sequencer configured to sequentially activate each of the three unidirectional coil sets and the six delta coil sets at the first frequency, and to measure the first signal value corresponding to each of the unidirectional and delta coil sets at the first frequency. The first sequencer further sequentially activates each of the three unidirectional coil sets and the six delta coil sets at the second frequency, and measures the second signal value corresponding to each of the unidirectional and delta coil sets at the second frequency. The signal processor further includes a processor configured to calculate, for each of the unidirectional and delta coil sets, and adjusted signal value as a predetermined function of the first signal value and the second signal value, so as to produce nine adjusted signal values, each corresponding to field energy from one of the unidirectional coil sets and the delta coil sets.

Another embodiment of the invention further includes a third transmitter configured to project into the navigational domain a third waveform sufficient to induce a third signal value in the field coil, where the third signal value is influenced by the interfering object. In this embodiment, the signal processor is further configured to receive the third signal value.

Another embodiment of the invention further includes a fourth transmitter configured to project into the navigational domain a fourth waveform sufficient to induce a fourth signal value ins aid field coil, the fourth signal value being influenced by the interfering object. In this embodiment, the signal processor is further configured to receive the fourth signal value.

Another embodiment of the invention further includes N-4 transmitters configured to project into the navigational domain N waveforms sufficient to induce N signal values in the field coil. The N signal values are influenced by the interfering object. The signal processor is further configured to receive N signal values.

In another aspect, the invention comprises a correction system for determining an effect of an interfering object on first and second field sensors in a navigational domain. The system includes a transmitter configured to project into the navigational domain, field energy sufficient to induce a first signal value in the first field sensor, and to induce a second signal value in the second field sensor. The system further includes a signal processor configured to receive the first signal value and the second signal value, and to determine the effect of the interfering object on the first field sensor, to thereby permit a substantially precise location of the first field sensor to be determined despite the presence of the interfering object.

In another embodiment of the invention, the field energy is magnetic field energy.

In another embodiment of the invention, the interfering object is a ferromagnetic and electrically conductive object.

In another embodiment of the invention, the field sensor includes an electrically conductive sensing coil.

In another embodiment of the invention, the transmitter includes three unidirectional coil sets. Each unidirectional coil set is driven by a unit capable of driving the unidirectional coil set at a first sinusoidal waveform at a first frequency. The transmitter further includes six delta coil sets, each of which is driven by a drive unit capable of driving the delta coil set at the first sinusoidal waveform at the first frequency, such that the three unidirectional coil sets and the six delta coil sets produce the field energy at the first frequency.

In another embodiment of the invention, the three unidirectional coil sets include a first unidirectional coil set oriented so as to produce a substantially uniform amplitude field directed in an x direction, a second unidirectional coil set oriented so as to produce a substantially uniform amplitude field directed in a y direction, and a third unidirectional coil set oriented so as to produce a substantially uniform amplitude field directed in a z direction, such that the x, y and z directions are substantially mutually orthogonal.

In another embodiment of the invention, the first unidirectional coil set has a first coil pair including a first coil element and a second coil element, and a second coil pair including a third coil element and a fourth coil element. The first coil element and the third coil element are disposed in a major surface of a platform, the second coil element is disposed in a first lateral wall of the platform, and the fourth coil element is disposed in a second lateral wall of the platform. The first lateral wall and the second lateral wall are substantially normal to the major surface and substantially parallel to one another.

In another embodiment of the invention, the second unidirectional coil set has a first coil element and a second coil element disposed within a platform, and the coil elements are spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another.

In another embodiment of the invention, the third unidirectional coil set has a first coil pair including a first coil element and a second coil element, and a second coil pair including a third coil element and a fourth coil element. The first coil element and the third coil element are disposed in a major surface of a platform, the second coil element is disposed in a first lateral wall of the platform, and the fourth coil element is disposed in a second lateral wall of the platform. The first lateral wall and the second lateral wall are substantially normal to the major surface and substantially parallel to one another.

In another embodiment of the invention, each of the pairs of coil elements includes a long coil and a short coil, and the pairs of coils are disposed at equal angles on a circle about an axis extending substantially perpendicular to the major surface. For each of the pairs of coils, a radius of the circle extends perpendicular to a direction of elongation of the pair, proceeding from the long coil to the short coil.

In another embodiment of the invention, the signal processor further includes a first sequencer configured to sequentially activate each of three unidirectional coil sets and six delta coil sets at the first frequency, and to measure the first signal value and the second signal value corresponding to each of the unidirectional and delta coil sets at the first frequency. The signal processor also includes a processor configured to calculate, for each of the unidirectional and delta coil sets, an adjusted signal value as a predetermined function of the first signal value and the second signal value, so as to produce nine adjusted signal values, each corresponding to field energy from one of the unidirectional coil sets and the delta coil sets.

In another aspect, the invention comprises a correction system for determining an effect of a field influencing shield device on a field sensor in a navigational domain. The correction system includes a transmitter configured to project into the navigational domain field energy sufficient to induce a signal value in the field sensor. The correction system further includes a storage device containing information corresponding to the fields energy in the navigational domain at selected locations within the navigational domain. The information includes shield information incorporating the effect of the field influencing shield device at the selected locations. The correction system further includes a processor for accessing the storage device and the signal value to determine the effect of the shield device on the field sensor, to thereby permit a substantially precise location of the field sensor to be determined despite the presence of the field influencing shield device.

In another embodiment of the invention, the field energy is magnetic field energy.

In another embodiment of the invention, the field sensor includes an electrically conductive sensing coil.

In another embodiment of the invention, the transmitter includes three unidirectional coil sets, each unidirectional coil set being driven by a unit capable of driving the unidirectional coil set at a first sinusoidal waveform at a first frequency. The transmitter further includes six delta coil sets, each the delta coil set being driven by a drive unit capable of driving the delta coil set at the first sinusoidal waveform at the first frequency, such that the three unidirectional coil sets and the six delta coil sets produce the field energy at the first frequency.

In another embodiment of the invention, the three unidirectional coil sets include a first unidirectional coil set oriented so as to produce a substantially uniform amplitude field directed in an x direction, a second unidirectional coil set oriented so as to produce a substantially uniform amplitude field directed in a y direction, and a third unidirectional coil set oriented so as to produce a substantially uniform amplitude field directed in a z direction, such that the x, y and z directions are substantially mutually orthogonal.

In another embodiment of the invention, the first unidirectional coil set has a first coil pair including a first coil element and a second coil element, and a second coil pair including a third coil element and a fourth coil element. The first coil element and the third coil element are disposed in a major surface of a platform, the second coil element is disposed in a first lateral wall of the platform, and the fourth coil element is disposed in a second lateral wall of the platform, wherein the first lateral wall and the second lateral wall are substantially normal to the major surface and substantially parallel to one another.

In another embodiment of the invention, the second unidirectional coil set having a first coil element and a second coil element disposed within a platform, the coil elements being spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another.

In another embodiment of the invention, the third unidirectional coil set has a first coil pair including a first coil element and a second coil element, and a second coil pair including a third coil element and a fourth coil element. The first coil element and the third coil element are disposed in a major surface of a platform, the second coil element is disposed in a first lateral wall of the platform, and the fourth coil element is disposed in a second lateral wall of the platform, wherein the first lateral wall and the second lateral wall are substantially normal to the major surface and substantially parallel to one another.

In another embodiment of the invention, each of the pairs of coil elements includes a long coil and a short coil, and the pairs of coils are disposed at equal angles on a circle about an axis extending substantially perpendicular to the major surface. For each of the pairs of coils, a radius of the circle extends perpendicular to a direction of elongation of the pair, proceeding from the long coil to the short coil.

In another embodiment of the invention, the processor further includes a first sequencer for sequentially activating each of the three unidirectional coils and the six delta coils at the first frequency, and measuring the signal value corresponding to each of the unidirectional and delta coils at the first frequency. The processor also includes a data manipulating device for manipulating, for each of the unidirectional and delta coils, the storage means as a predetermined function of the shield device, so as to produce nine sets of manipulated magnetic field values, each corresponding to navigational magnetic energy from one of the unidirectional coils and delta coils.

Another aspect of the invention comprises a method of determining a substantially precise location of a field sensor within a navigational domain influenced by a field interfering object. The method includes inducing within the field sensor a first signal value at a first waveform, the first signal value being influenced by the field interfering object. The method further includes inducing within the field sensor a second signal value at a second waveform, the second signal value being influenced by the field interfering object. The method also includes determining a correction to the first signal value for the effects of the field interfering object.

In another embodiment of the invention, determining a correction further includes calculating an adjusted signal value as a predetermined function of the first signal value and the second signal value.

Another aspect of the invention comprises a method of determining a substantially precise location of a first field sensor within a navigational domain influenced by a field interfering object. The method includes inducing within the first field sensor a first signal value, the first signal value being influenced by the field interfering object. The method further includes inducing within a second field sensor a second signal value, the second signal value being influenced by the field interfering object. The method also includes determining a correction to the first signal value for the effects of the field interfering object.

Another aspect of the invention comprises a method of determining a substantially precise location of a field sensor within a navigational domain influenced by a field influencing shield device. The method includes inducing within the field sensor a first signal value, the first signal value being influenced by the field interfering object. The method further includes accessing information from a storage device, the information including shield information incorporating the effect of the field influencing shield device at selected locations. The method further includes determining a correction to the first signal value for the effects of the field influencing shield device.

In another embodiment of the invention, determining a correction further including manipulating the storage device as a predetermined function of the shield information, so as to produce a set of manipulated magnetic field values corresponding to the effects of the field influencing shield device.

In another aspect, the invention comprises a method of determining a substantially precise location of a field sensor within a navigational domain influenced by a field interfering object. The method includes sequentially projecting into the navigational domain, via three unidirectional coils and six delta coils, navigational energy at a first frequency, and measuring a first signal value in the field sensor corresponding to each of the three unidirectional coils and the six delta coils, so as to produce nine of the first signal values. The method further includes sequentially projecting into the navigational domain, via three unidirectional coils and six delta coils, the navigational energy at a second frequency, and measuring a second signal value in the field sensor corresponding to each of the three unidirectional coils and the six delta coils, so as to produce nine of the second signal values. The method further includes calculating, for each of the unidirectional and delta coils, an adjusted signal value as a predetermined function of the first signal value and the second signal value, so as to produce nine adjusted signal values, each corresponding to navigational magnetic energy from one of the unidirectional coils and delta coils. The method also includes forming three independent equations including three adjusted signal values corresponding to the unidirectional coils, three predetermined field magnitude values due to each of the unidirectional coils and corresponding to the navigational energy at a last navigational point of the sensing coil, and unknown orientation variables, and simultaneously solving the independent equations to determine the orientation variables corresponding to the compensated orientation of the sensing coil. The method also includes generating three lines and determining an intersection of the three lines. The intersection corresponds to the compensated position of the sensing coil. Each of the lines is generated from adjusted signal values corresponding to a pair of the delta coils, and predetermined field magnitude values due to the pair of delta coils and corresponding to the navigational energy at the last navigational point of the sensing coil while oriented according to the compensated orientation.

In another aspect, the invention comprises a method of determining a substantially precise location of a first field sensor within a navigational domain influenced by a field interfering object. The method includes sequentially projecting into the navigational domain, via three unidirectional coils and six delta coils, the navigational energy at a first frequency, measuring a first signal value in the field sensor corresponding to each of the three unidirectional coils and the six delta coils, so as to produce nine of the first signal values, and measuring a second signal value in a second field sensor corresponding to each of the three unidirectional coils and the six delta coils, so as to produce nine of the second signal values. The method further includes calculating, for each of the unidirectional and delta coils, an adjusted signal value as a predetermined function of the first signal value and the second signal value, so as to produce nine adjusted signal values, each corresponding to navigational magnetic energy from one of the unidirectional coils and delta coils. The method also includes forming three independent equations including three adjusted signal values corresponding to the unidirectional coils, three predetermined field magnitude values due to each of the unidirectional coils and corresponding to the navigational energy at a last navigational point of the sensing coil, and unknown orientation variables, and simultaneously solving the independent equations to determine the orientation variables corresponding to the compensated orientation of the sensing coil. The method also includes generating three lines and determining an intersection of the three lines, the intersection corresponding to the compensated position of the sensing coil. Each of the lines is generated from adjusted signal values corresponding to a pair of the delta coils, and predetermined field magnitude values due to the pair of delta coils and corresponding to the navigational energy at the last navigational point of the sensing coil while oriented according to the compensated orientation.

Another aspect of the invention comprises a method of determining a substantially precise location of a field sensor within a navigational domain influenced by a field influencing shield device. The method includes sequentially projecting into the navigational domain, via three unidirectional coils and six delta coils, the navigational energy at a first frequency, and measuring a first signal value in the field sensor corresponding to each of the three unidirectional coils and the six delta coils, so as to produce nine of the first signal values. The method further includes forming three independent equations including three adjusted signal values corresponding to the unidirectional coils, three predetermined field magnitude values due to fields from each of the unidirectional coils and corresponding to the navigational energy at a last navigational point of the field sensor, the predetermined navigational energy at a first frequency, measuring a first signal value in the field sensor corresponding to each of the three unidirectional coils and the six delta coils, so as to produce nine of the first signal values, and measuring a second signal value in a second field sensor corresponding to each of the three unidirectional coils and the six delta coils, so as to produce nine of the second signal values. The method further includes calculating, for each of the unidirectional and delta coils, an adjusted signal value as a predetermined function of the first signal value and the second signal value, so as to produce nine adjusted signal values, each corresponding to navigational magnetic energy from one of the unidirectional coils and delta coils. The method also includes forming three independent equations including three adjusted signal values corresponding to the unidirectional coils, three predetermined field magnitude values due to each of the unidirectional coils and corresponding to the navigational energy at a last navigational point of the sensing coil, and unknown orientation variables, and simultaneously solving the independent equations to determine the orientation variables corresponding to the compensated orientation of the sensing coil. The method also includes generating three lines and determining an intersection of the three lines, the intersection corresponding to the compensated position of the sensing coil. Each of the lines is generated from adjusted signal values corresponding to a pair of the delta coils, and predetermined field magnitude values due to the pair of delta coils and corresponding to the navigational energy at the last navigational point of the sensing coil while oriented according to the compensated orientation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other objects of this invention, the various features thereof, as well as the invention itself, may be more fully understood from the following description, when read together with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a graphical view of prior art methods of identifying a general point in three dimensional space;

FIG. 2 is a graphical view of a prior art method of identifying the position and orientation of a sensing coil in three dimensional space;

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an examination deck used for implementing the location and compensation methods according to the present invention;

FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of a unidirectional coil set for generating uniform x-directed fields in the navigational domain;

FIG. 5 shows a schematic representation of a unidirectional coil set for generating uniform y-directed fields in the navigational domain;

FIG. 6 shows a schematic representation of a unidirectional coil set for generating uniform z-directed fields in the navigational domain;

FIG. 7 shows a schematic representation of a coil configuration for generating vector gradient fields in the navigational domain;

FIG. 8 shows a schematic representation of the coil configuration of FIG. 7, including constant signal surfaces generated by those coils;

FIG. 9 shows an upper plan schematic view of a delta coil group from FIG. 7 relative to an inner circular space representing the projection of navigational domain into the plane of the delta coils;

FIG. 10 depicts an example of a tool coil attached to a surgical tool used to drill holes in the vertebrae of a patient, as well as an exemplary hysteresis graph of such a ferromagnetic tool.

FIG. 11 depicts an example of the use of the surgical tool of FIG. 10 with an attached tool coil.

FIG. 12 illustrates a perspective view of an examination deck suitable for implementing the location and compensation methods in the presence of a shield device, according to the present invention;

FIG. 13 shows a flow diagram for a method of eddy current compensation in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 14 shows a flow diagram for a method of ferromagnetic and conductor compensation in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 15 shows a flow diagram for a method of shield device compensation in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 16 shows a more detailed flow diagram for the orientation calculation step of FIG. 13;

FIG. 17 shows a more detailed flow diagram for the access step of FIG. 13;

FIG. 18 shows a more detailed flow diagram for the orientation calculation step of FIG. 15;

FIG. 19 shows a more detailed flow diagram for the position calculation step of FIG. 15;

FIG. 20A shows a perspective view of the disposition of the nine coil sets of the examination deck;

FIG. 20B shows a schematic view of the coil sets of FIG. 20A;

FIG. 21A shows a perspective view of an exemplary disturbance which is in the form of a metallic ring, along with the equivalent circuit model;

FIG. 21B shows a perspective view of an elliptical slab of metal including an off center circular hole, along with the equivalent circuit model; and,

FIG. 21C shows a perspective view of a solid square metal plate, along with the equivalent circuit model.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention is directed to a system and method for determining the position and orientation of a catheter or other suitable probe inserted into a selected body cavity of a patient undergoing a surgical procedure in the presence of field-influencing objects.

In one embodiment of the present invention, position and orientation data is determined from a series of measurements of voltage amplitudes induced within a sensing coil affixed to the distal end of the catheter probe as a result of the use of multiple waveforms. These voltage amplitudes, as a function of the waveforms, are induced in the sensing coil in response to known independent electromagnetic fields that are projected into the anatomical region of interest. The measurements provide information to compute the angular orientation and the positional coordinates of the sensing coil and account for the distortion of the known field by arbitrary conductors with field-induced eddy currents.

In another embodiment of the present invention, position and orientation data is determined from a series of measurements of voltage amplitudes induced within a sensing coil and a tool coil. The sensing coil is affixed to the distal end of the catheter probe. The tool coil is affixed to a field-influencing object with a ferromagnetic and conducting core. The field-influencing object, in the presence of a known electromagnetic field, distorts that field and influences the measurement of the sensing coil. The voltage amplitudes from both coils are stored and can be mathematically manipulated so as to isolate the effect of the field-influencing object on the sensing coil. Thus, the measurements of the induced voltage amplitudes on the sensing coil and on the tool coil provide information to account for the presence of the field-influencing object with a ferromagnetic and conductor core.

In another embodiment of the present invention, the position and orientation data is determined from a series of measurements of voltage amplitudes induced within a sensing coil affixed to the distal end of the catheter probe in the presence of a shield device. These voltage amplitudes are induced in the sensing coil in response to two fields. One of the fields is the known independent electromagnetic field projected into the anatomical region of interest from field coils. The other field is that of the known field as reflected from the shield device. The measurements of the induced voltage amplitudes and the knowledge of the geometry and effect of the shield device provide sufficient information to compute the angular orientation and the positional coordinates of this sensing coil in the presence of the shield device.

DEFINITIONS

As used herein, “sensing coil” refers to an electrically conductive, magnetically sensitive element that is responsive to time-dependent magnetic fields and generates an induced voltage as a function of and representative of the applied time-dependent magnetic field. The sensing coil is adaptable for secure engagement to the distal end of a catheter probe.

As used herein, “tool coil” refers to an electrically conductive, magnetically sensitive element that is responsive to time-dependent magnetic fields and generates an induced voltage as a function of and representative of the applied time-dependent magnetic field. The tool coil is adaptable for secure engagement to an object with a ferromagnetic and conducting core.

As used herein, “navigational domain” refers to a fully enclosed spatial region whose internal volume substantially encloses the complete prospective range of movement of the sensing coil. The navigational domain may be defined by any geometrical space, but preferably takes the form of a spherical volume. Under surgical operating conditions, the navigational domain will correspond to an anatomical region of the recumbent patient where surgical viewing or investigation is desired (e.g., a diseased area of tissue or an organ).

As used herein, “peripheral domain” refers to the spatial region outside of the navigational domain. Under surgical operating conditions, the peripheral domain may include the region that contains the operating table, or the region that encompasses other equipment within the operating room.

As used herein, “last navigational point” (hereinafter “the LNP”) refers to the most recently determined location of the sensing coil before another iteration of the location algorithm is performed.

As used herein, “uniform amplitude field” refers to a magnetic field having a large magnetic field amplitude component in a specified direction and relatively smaller magnetic field amplitude components in the other directions. The uniform amplitude field is characterized by substantially uniform field amplitude values, throughout the navigational domain. In the x-y-z coordinate system used herein, where the uniform amplitude fields of interest are the x-directed, y-directed, and z-directed fields, the amplitudes of the induced voltage drops developed by such fields in the sensing coil are designated with superscripts V^x, V^Y, and V^z, respectively.

As used herein, “waveform” refers to the temporal shape of a magnetic field, illustrated graphically by a plot of the magnitude of a magnetic field as a function of time. A waveform in general can take on the characteristics of any form. For example, a waveform may be sinusoidal with angular frequency ω, which has the general form exp(−iωt) where i=√{square root over ((−1))}, ω is the angular frequency, t is the time, exp(n) denotes the natural base of logarithms e raised to the power n. A waveform can also be sawtooth in nature, or square in nature.

As used herein, “unidirectional coils” refer to a magnetic assembly that is operative to generate a uniform amplitude field (as defined above) within the navigational domain. A distinct magnetic assembly is employed for each uniform amplitude field. Although the unidirectional coils described herein are preferably implemented with a collection of appropriately designed magnetic coils, this implementation should not be construed as a limitation of the present invention. Rather, the unidirectional coils may be constructed from any magnetic configuration that is sufficient to generate the uniform amplitude fields.

As used herein, “vector gradient field” refers to a time-dependent magnetic field having nonzero vector gradient field components (i.e., magnetic field vector components with a high spatial gradient) in two of the three magnetic field components, and a substantially zero vector gradient field component in the remaining magnetic field component in an appropriately chosen coordinate system. For example, if the appropriately chosen coordinate system is an x-y-z coordinate system at a position R in the navigational domain, then the magnetic field amplitude Hⁿ(R) (a vector field) can be written as:

Hⁿ(R)=(H_xⁿ(R),H_yⁿ(R),H_zⁿ(R))

where the components H_xⁿ(R), H_yⁿ(R), and H_zⁿ(R) represent the magnetic field amplitude strengths of the nth coil (designated by the superscript “n”) in the x-direction, y-direction, and z-direction, respectively and are individually scalar quantities. The value of a vector gradient of such a magnetic field amplitude Hⁿ(R) where the magnetic field has a substantially zero vector gradient component in the z-direction can be written as the following vector gradient (or tensor) field:

{right arrow over (∇)}Hⁿ(R)=({right arrow over (∇)}H_xⁿ(R),{right arrow over (∇)}H_yⁿ(R),0), where
{right arrow over (∇)}H_xⁿ(R)≠0, and
{right arrow over (∇)}H_yⁿ(R)≠0

and where the gradient operator {right arrow over (∇)} has the usual representation in x-y-z coordinates:

$\vec{\nabla} = (\frac{\partial}{\partial_{x}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial_{y}}, \frac{\partial}{\partial_{z}})$

In practical settings, a substantially zero vector gradient component is generated when the magnitude of the substantially zero vector gradient component value is small compared to the magnitude of the net vector resulting from the other two magnetic field components.

As used herein, “fixed orientation” with respect to a catheter probe refers to a catheter probe with constant values of orientation variables θ and φ, over a selected range of x, y, and z positional values.

As used herein, “constant signal surface” or “constant voltage surface” refers to a surface contour along which at every possible point of location for the sensing coil, the same induced voltage is developed in the sensing coil. In practice, the constant signal surface will be a small planar region located near the LNP with the sensing coil at a fixed orientation (as defined above).

As used herein, “delta coil” refers to a magnetic assembly for generating a vector gradient field (as defined above) within the navigational domain. As will become more apparent hereinafter, the delta coil will typically be described in the context of delta coil pairs including a long delta coil and a short delta coil, each pair generating vector gradient fields with the substantially zero component in the same-axial dimension but whose magnetic field patterns in the remaining components are independent of each other. Each of the long and short delta coils may be considered to generate a family of constant signal or constant voltage surfaces for the sensing coil within the navigational domain. Although the delta coils are preferably implemented with an array of appropriately designed magnetic coils (discussed below), this preferred implementation should not serve as a limitation of the present invention as it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that other magnetic configurations may be used to adequately generate the vector gradient fields.

As used herein, “magnetic look-up-table” (alternatively referenced as “the LUT”) refers to a database including the magnetic field amplitude values at every x-y-z coordinate position within the navigational domain for the unidirectional coils and for each delta coil used by the present invention. Accordingly, input data consisting of an x-y-z coordinate and a magnetic field amplitude identifier, which designates a selected magnetic coil assembly, is indexed within the database to a corresponding set of magnetic field amplitude values constituting the output data. For the x-y-z coordinate system, the output data is represented by the magnetic field amplitude variables H_xⁿH_yⁿH_zⁿwhere the subscript x-y-z indicates the axial dimension along which the magnetic field amplitude value is being reported and the superscript is the identifier for a selected magnetic coil assembly acting as the source. The database is created through a computational analysis of the magnetic field amplitude patterns generated by the magnetic coil configurations used herein. The mathematical model to develop the necessary formulae defining the field patterns may be developed, for example, from near field electromagnetic theory. An instructive text for facilitating such an analysis is “Field and Wave Electromagnetics” 2nd edition Addison Wesley (1989) by D. K. Cheng, herein incorporated by reference. The database may be stored in any type of facility including, inter alia, read-only memory, firmware, optical storage, or other types of computer storage. Additionally, the database information may be organized into any type of format such as a spreadsheet. It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that any suitable technique may be used to ascertain or record the magnetic field values for the magnetic coil assemblies used herein.

In the coordinate system for describing the present invention, the z-axis coincides with the longitudinal dimension extending from the patient's head to foot. The x-axis coincides with a lateral dimension across the patient's body, and the y-axis is perpendicular to the planar top of the pallet or examination deck. These dimensions are identified as the patient is disposed in the recumbent position on the pallet.

Assembly for Implementing Location and Compensation Methods

Magnetic Assembly for Determining Angular Orientation of Sensing Coil

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a perspective view of examination deck 17 that facilitates implementation of the location and compensation methods in accordance with all preferred embodiments of the present invention. Examination deck 17 employs a magnetic coil assembly arranged in a flat configuration. Examination deck 17 includes planar top platform 10 suitable for accommodating a recumbent patient disposed lengthwise. Navigational domain is illustratively depicted as the spherical volume enclosing sensing coil 14. Tool coil 19 is located in peripheral domain 15. Sensing coil 14 is attached via connection means 16 to an external signal detection apparatus (not shown). Tool coil 19 is likewise attached to an external signal detection apparatus. Although sensing coil 14 functions optimally within navigational domain 12, tool coil 19 may lie within peripheral domain 15 or navigational domain 12. The coil sets embedded in platform 10 (and described in connection with FIGS. 4-7) are activated by a signal drive unit (not shown) connected via line 18. Examination deck 17 is preferably constructed from a suitable magnetically-permeable material to facilitate magnetic coupling between the embedded coil sets and the overlying sensing coil.

First conducting body 23 and second conducting body 31 are shown in FIG. 3 in peripheral domain 15. However, both first conducting body 23 and second conducting body 31 can lie within navigational domain 12 as well in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. First conducting body 23 and second conducting body 31 respond to the fields generated by the field coils by developing eddy currents. These eddy currents, in turn, generate new fields that can influence the measured voltage across sensor coil 14 as is discussed in more detail below.

Ferromagnetic body 29 is shown in peripheral domain 15 and is shown enveloped within tool coil 19. Again, ferromagnetic body 29 and tool coil 19 can lie within navigational domain 12 as well in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Ferromagnetic body 29 responds to the fields generated by the field coils by both focusing the magnetic flux lines and by introducing a phase shifted field. The focusing and phase shifting effect of ferromagnetic body 29 can influence the voltage drop as measured across sensor coil 14 as is discussed in more detail below.

Coil Sets for Generating x-Directed, y-Directed, and z-Directed Fields

FIGS. 4-6 schematically illustrate unidirectional coil sets for generating substantially uniform amplitude x-directed, y-directed and z-directed fields, respectively, throughout navigational domain 12. The uniform amplitude field in one embodiment of the present invention can be operated at multiple waveforms, for example, a sinusoidal waveform with angular frequency ω₁and a sinusoidal waveform with angular frequency ω₂are two different waveforms.

Unidirectional coil set 25 of FIG. 4 includes a first coil pair with elements 20 and 24 and a second coil pair with elements 22 and 26, where the current flow as supplied by drive unit 28 is indicated by the arrow symbol. Coil elements 20 and 22 are disposed in the major surface of platform 10, while elements 24 and 26 are disposed in the lateral walls of platform 10. Elements 24 and 26 are preferably used as compensation coils to substantially cancel undesirable field components generated by elements 20 and 22 in the y and z directions. The coils cumulatively generate a substantially uniform amplitude x-directed field as indicated by representative field line 27.

Unidirectional coil set 35 of FIG. 5 schematically illustrates a coil set for generating a substantially uniform amplitude y-directed field throughout navigational domain 12 as indicated by representative field line 33. The coil set includes a coil pair with elements 30 and 32 disposed in spaced-apart and parallel relationship within platform 10, with the indicated current flow as supplied by drive unit 34.

Unidirectional coil set 45 of FIG. 6 generates a substantially uniform amplitude z-directed field as indicated by representative field line 43. Coil set 45 includes a first coil pair with elements 38 and 42 and a second coil pair with elements 36 and 40, where the current flow as supplied by drive unit 44 is indicated by the arrow symbol. Coil elements 36 and 38 are disposed in the major surface of platform 10, while elements 40 and 42 are disposed in the lateral walls of platform 10. Elements 40 and 42 are preferably used as compensation coils to substantially cancel undesirable field components generated by elements 36 and 38 in they direction.

Unidirectional coil sets 25, 35, and 45 are illustrative only and should not be construed as a limitation of the present invention. It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that other coil configurations are possible within the scope of the present invention provided such other configurations produce the desired magnetic field patterns in navigational domain 12 at the desired frequency. A first connection means (not shown) couples sensing coil 14 to a signal measuring device, and a second connection means (also not shown) couples tool coil 19 to a signal measuring device.

Coil Sets for Generating Vector Gradient Fields

FIGS. 7 and 8 show a coil configuration that can be used to determine the positional coordinates of sensing coil 14 in accordance with all of the preferred embodiments of the present invention. The configuration includes six coils grouped into three pairs of long and short delta coils (50 and 52, 54 and 56, 58 and 60). The delta coils are mutually coplanar and are disposed in the planar top of the examination deck immediately beneath the recumbent patient. Interconnection means between delta coil group 51, delta coil group 55, delta coil group 59 and a signal drive unit (not shown) is indicated.

The coils are preferably arranged in a circular orientation about the y-axis such that there is an axis perpendicular to the direction of elongation of the coils, proceeding from the long coil set to the short coil set, where that axis is at 0°, 120° and 240° to the z-axis. By way of reference, the x-axis is considered to be oriented at 270° with respect to the z-axis in the x-z plane. The magnetic field generated by delta coil group 51 is shown representatively by the field lines extending from the upper region of the coils. In one embodiment of the present invention, the resulting vector gradient field can be operated at multiple waveforms. For example, a sinusoidal waveform with angular frequency ω₁and a sinusoidal waveform with angular frequency ω₂are two different waveforms. The field lines from delta coil group 51 form the family of constant signal surfaces shown in FIG. 8 within the navigational domain 12. Superposition of the constant signal surfaces generated by long coil set 50 and short coil set 52 produce the bounded regions indicated in FIG. 8. The intersection of two such constant signal surfaces generated by short coil set 52 and long coil set 50 is line 70.

FIG. 9 shows an upper plan schematic view of delta coil group 51 relative to an inner circular space representing the projection of navigational domain 12 into the plane of the delta coils. This design creates a high spatial gradience in two of the axis dimensions and a substantially zero field value in the remaining axial dimension. This particular design is accomplished by modifying the termination points of the coils with compensation coils such that the modified coil is effectively operative as an infinitely long coil. Long coil sets 50, 54, and 58 are further compensated by central “sucker” coils, indicated in FIG. 9 for long coil set 50 as central “sucker” coil 88. Accordingly, each of the long coils and short coils is modified by representative compensation coils 80 and 82, 84 and 86, 88, 90 and 94, and 92 and 96 respectively, disposed at the indicated endpoints and center of the corresponding delta coil. The long coil and short coil configurations are shown schematically for only delta coil group 51, but similar configurations likewise exist for delta coil group 55 and delta coil group 59, shown representatively as the indicated lines.

Parameters related to the quality of the coils, such as (i) the degree of uniformity of the uniform amplitude field coils and (ii) how close to zero the vector gradient field is in the non-gradient direction for the delta coils, determine the size of navigational domain 12 and peripheral domain 15.

Tool Coil System for Ferromagnetic and Conductor Compensation

FIG. 10 indicates tool coil 19 affixed to surgical tool 108, where surgical tool 108 is a ferromagnetic and conducting object. Also shown is exemplary hysteresis graph 100 of surgical tool 108. Hysteresis graph 100 illustrates the nonlinear behavior of a magnetic field H associated with surgical tool 108 in response to an applied magnetic field B. Such a response is typical of ferromagnetic objects.

FIG. 11 indicates how surgical tool 108 and tool coil 19 of FIG. 10 may be used in practice. Surgical tool 108 is used to drill holes into vertebrae 110.

Shield Device

FIG. 12 schematically illustrates a perspective view of examination deck 17 that facilitates implementation of the location and compensation algorithms in accordance with shield device 120. Examination deck 17 includes planar top platform 10 suitable for accommodating a recumbent patient disposed lengthwise. Examination deck 17 rests on base 122. Navigational domain 12 is illustratively depicted as the spherical volume enclosing a sensing coil 14 attached via connection means 16 to an external signal detection apparatus (not shown). The coil sets embedded in platform 10 (and described in connection with FIGS. 4-7) are activated by a signal drive unit (not shown) connected via line 18. The examination deck is preferably constructed from a suitable magnetically permeable material to facilitate magnetic coupling between the embedded coil sets and the overlying sensing coil. Shield device 120 can be made from aluminum, copper or virtually any other conductive material. It is also possible to use materials other than a conductive sheet such as a mesh or strips of material. A further possibility is to use a plastic of polymer film with a conductive coating.

Overview of Compensation Methods

System and Method for Extraneous Eddy Current Compensation

FIG. 13 indicates a schematic of a method for eddy current compensation consistent with the present invention. Measuring steps 132 and 134 involve activating each of nine coil sets and measuring the field at sensing coil 14 at different waveforms. For example, a sinusoidal waveform with angular frequency ω₁and a sinusoidal waveform with angular frequency ω₂correspond to two different waveforms.

The nine coil sets correspond to three unidirectional coil sets and three delta coil groups, where each delta coil group contains a long coil set and a short coil set. The unidirectional coil sets-generate uniform amplitude fields in the x, y, and z-directions and are depicted in FIGS. 4, 5, and 6. From FIG. 7, delta coil group 25 includes short coil set 52 at 0° (denoted by n=1(s)) and a long coil set 54 at 0° (denoted by n=2(L)); delta coil group 55 includes short coil set 56 at 120° denoted by n=2(s)) and long coil set 54 at 120° (denoted by n=2(L)); and delta coil group 59 includes—short coil set 60 at 240° (denoted by n=3(s)) and long coil set 58 at 240° (denoted by n=3(L)). The angular designations associated with the delta coil groups indicate the angle with respect to the z-axis of the coil dimension that is perpendicular to the direction of elongation of the delta coils as in FIG. 7. Accordingly, the three delta coil groups are arranged pair-wise in a circular orientation about the y-axis at angles of 0°, 120°, and 240°.

As described above, a series of fields are generated and measured in sensing coil 14 at a first waveform (measuring step 132) and at an mth waveform (measuring step 134). For example, considering two waveforms where the waveforms correspond to substantially uniform amplitude fields with sinusoidal waveforms and angular frequencies ω₁and ω₂and considering x-directed fields of coil set 25 of FIG. 4 with measured values of

$V^{x} (ω_{1}), V^{x} (ω_{2})$

in sensing coil 14, the value of a constant τ_eddydefined by:

$τ_{eddy} = \frac{Re {\frac{V^{x} (ω_{2})}{ω_{2}} - \frac{V^{x} (ω_{1})}{ω_{1}}}}{Im {V^{x} (ω_{1}) - V^{x} (ω_{2})}}$

is calculated where “Re” indicates the real part (0 radians phase shifted part), and “Im” indicates the imaginary part (τ/2 radians phase shifted part) of the terms enclosed in the brackets. This corresponds to a portion of calculation step 138 of FIG. 13 in one embodiment of the present invention and will be discussed in more detail below.

Finally, an adjusted value for the potential drop

$V_{adjst}^{x}$

is calculated using τ_eddy. Again, using the above example of substantially uniform amplitude fields with sinusoidal waveforms and angular frequencies ω₁and ω₂, the value of

$V_{adjst}^{x}$

is:

$V_{adjst}^{x} = Re {V^{x}} + ω τ_{eddy} I m {V^{x}} .$

This completes calculation step 138 of FIG. 13 in one embodiment of the present invention. Again, this will be discussed in more detail below.

In another embodiment of the present invention, measurements are performed at four different waveforms (measuring steps 132 and 134 in FIG. 13). For example, considering a magnetic field waveform that is sinusoidal in nature with angular frequency ω, measurements at four frequencies ω₁, ω₂, ω₃, and ω₄correspond to measuring steps 132 and 134 at four different waveforms.

Using the measured values of the real and imaginary portions of the potential drop across sensing coil 14 yields the following four equations:

$Re {V^{n}} = V_{adjst}^{n} - ω Im {V^{n}} (τ^{*} + ω τ^{**})$

with three unknowns: τ*, τ**, and

$V_{adjust}^{n} .$

Thus, the value of

$V_{adjust}^{n}$

can be determined using singular value decomposition as is described in more detail below. Again, this corresponds to calculation step 138 in FIG. 13 in one embodiment of the present invention.

At query step 140, it is determined whether all unidirectional field coils have been activated. In the example here, only the x-directed coils have been activated (coil set 25 of FIG. 4). Thus, a corresponding set of substantially uniform amplitude fields with different waveforms are generated and measured at sensing coil 14 in the y-direction by coil set 35 of FIG. 5, and then likewise in the z-direction by coil set 45 of FIG. 6, with the appropriate calculations.

Next, at query step 142, it is determined whether all of the delta coil sets have been activated. As above, each delta coil set is activated in succession the induced voltage is measured in sensing coil 14 at different waveforms. Again as above, the measurement of the voltage drops at the two waveforms allow for the calculation of an adjusted voltage drop across sensing coil 14. V_adjstis the signal that would have been picked up by sensor coil 14 if the conductive body disturbance had not been present.

Following the calculation of the adjusted voltage drop for all nine coils, an orientation calculation is performed in step 144 to determine the values of the sensing coil 14 orientation variables φ and θ, independent of the unknown sensing coil 14 positional variables (x, y, z). A more detailed breakdown of orientation calculation 144 is shown in FIG. 16 and is discussed in more detail below.

Finally, in step 146 of FIG. 13, a position calculation is performed to obtain the positional variables (x, y, z) of sensing coil 14. A more detailed breakdown of position calculation 146 is shown in FIG. 17. In FIG. 17, access step 176 indicates that orientation calculation 144 is preferably performed before positional calculation 146. Next, in access step 178, the LUT is accessed to obtain the magnetic field values at the LNP for a long delta coil set and a short delta coil set. These magnetic field values and the as-computed values for the orientation angles θ and φ are substituted into the appropriate induced voltage equations to calculate for each delta coil the value of the voltage amplitude signal induced in the sensing coil at the LNP. Based on the difference between the measured and the LNP values for the induced voltage signals, a calculation is performed in step 180 that permits identification of a line ℑⁿon which sensing coil 14 lies, as described in more detail below. In query step 182, it is determined whether such a line ℑⁿhas been identified for each delta coil group. Following the identification of three lines ℑ¹, ℑ², ℑ³calculation step 184 is performed to determine where in space the lines ℑ¹, ℑ², ℑ³intersect. That position in space is the location (x, y, z) of sensing coil 14.

System and Method for Ferromagnetic and Conductive Object Compensation

FIG. 14 indicates a schematic for ferromagnetic and conductor compensation consistent with the present invention. Measuring step 152 is similar to measuring step 132 as described above for FIG. 13. Measuring step 154 is different, however, in that a measurement is performed across tool coil 19.

As above, the nine coil sets correspond to three unidirectional coil sets and three delta coil groups, where each delta coil group contains a long coil set and a short coil set. The unidirectional coil sets generate uniform amplitude fields in the x, y, and z-directions and are depicted in FIGS. 4, 5, and 6. The delta coil sets are depicted in FIG. 7 and described above.

In particular, a series of substantially uniform amplitude fields are detected by sensing coil 14 (measuring step 152) and tool coil 19 (measuring step 154) originating from unidirectional coil set 25 of FIG. 4, unidirectional coil set 35 of FIG. 5, and unidirectional coil set 45 of FIG. 6. Also, as described in conjunction with FIG. 13, each delta coil is activated in succession and a corresponding induced voltage is measured in sensing coil 14 (measuring step 152) and tool coil 19 (measuring step 154).

Again, as discussed in more detail below, the measured voltage drops allow for the calculation of an adjusted voltage drop across sensing coil 14, the voltage that would be present if there were no disturbance. The first step, indicated in calculation step 156, is to calculate the value of a constant K where

$Im {V^{n} - {KV}_{ferro}^{n}} = 0$

where “Im” indicates the imaginary part (τ/2 radians phase shifted part) as above. In calculation step 160, the value of

$V_{adjst}^{n}$

is calculated using K

$V_{adjst}^{n} = V^{n} - {KV}_{ferro}^{n}$

This is step 160 of FIG. 14 and is described in more detail below.

The remaining steps indicated in FIG. 14 have already been discussed above in the context of FIG. 13 with the same reference numbers.

System and Method for Shield Device Compensation

FIG. 15 indicates a schematic of a method for shield device compensation consistent with the present invention. Again, a magnetic assembly of nine individual coil sets and shield device 120 are used to generate magnetic fields sufficient to develop a corresponding set of nine induced voltage signals at sensing coil 14. Measurement step 162 indicates such a measurement. The major difference associated with shield device compensation is observed in calculation steps 164 and 166. Rather than the standard orientation calculation step 144 of FIGS. 13 and 14, and presented in more detail in FIG. 16, orientation calculation step 164 of FIG. 15 is shown in more detail in FIG. 18. Additionally, rather than the standard position calculation step 146 of FIGS. 13 and 14, and presented in more detail in FIG. 17, position calculation step 166 of FIG. 15 is shown in more detail in FIG. 19. In FIG. 18, an additional manipulation step 188 is incorporated as compared to the schematic of FIG. 16. Likewise, in FIG. 19, an additional manipulation step 192 is incorporated, as compared to the schematic of FIG. 17. The additional manipulation step associated with the shield device compensation method involves the manipulation of the values of the LUT. Specifically, knowledge of the geometry of the coil sets and shield device 120 is sufficient to allow manipulation of the LUT in order to account for the effect of shield device 120 within navigational domain 12. The effects of arbitrary field-influencing objects that lie in peripheral domain 15 and anterior to shield device 120 are thereby cancelled.

In particular, the LUT consists of a database containing the magnetic field amplitude values H_xⁿ(R), H_yⁿ(R), and H_zⁿ(R) at every x-y-z coordinate location within the navigational domain for five coil sets: the unidirectional coil sets for generating the uniform amplitude fields in the x, y, and z-directions denoted by n=x, y, or z; the short coil (SC) set at 0° denoted by n=1(s); and the long coil (LC) set at 0° denoted by n=1(L). The magnetic field value data for the short and long coil sets at 120° and 240° may be obtained from the LUT by rotating the field vectors for the long and short coil sets at 0° (n=(n=1(s) and n=1(L)) by the angle (i.e., ±120°) appropriate for the given coil set. The input data for the LUT consists of the x-y-z coordinates and a designation of which coil set is being used to generate the magnetic fields (the superscript “n”). In response to this input data, the LUT supplies the magnetic field amplitude values H_xⁿ(R), H_yⁿ(R), and H_zⁿ(R) at the selected x-y-z coordinates for the designated coil set. Note that in the previously discussed preferred embodiments of the present invention, the LUT can only be successfully utilized after compensation for field-influencing objects has occurred. However, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, compensation for shield device 120 may be incorporated into the LUT.

The LUT is present to speed up the operational sequence of the location algorithm. Otherwise, an undesirable computational delay exists if the required magnetic fields from the nine coil sets must be individually calculated during each iteration of the algorithm. By predetermining the magnetic field values and storing them in LUT, the location algorithm need only access the LUT to retrieve the appropriate field value without endeavoring into any complex field analysis. This is especially true when shield device compensation is an issue. At x-y-z coordinates other than those for which magnetic field values are determined in the LUT, an interpolation procedure is employed to calculate the field value.

Detailed Description of Method for Determining Unknown Position Coordinates by Sampling a Known Navigation Field

The system and method used herein is directed to the development of a series of measurements and calculations able to account for the effects of a field-influencing object that would otherwise introduce error into a position and orientation determination. The relationships defined by these systems and methods are such that the unknown effects of the field-influencing object are separable.

Determining the Angular Orientation of a Probe in the Absence of Extraneous Fields

This section describes in more detail the orientation calculation as indicated by the schematic of FIG. 16. The angular orientation of sensor coil 14 is represented by an angle θ corresponding to the angle of departure from the z-axis and an angle φ corresponding to the angle between the x-axis and the projection onto the x-y plane of the vector coincident with the longitudinal axis of sensing coil 14 as shown in FIG. 2.

The unidirectional coils are activated in succession, each generating a substantially uniform amplitude field that projects into navigational domain 12 and induces a corresponding voltage signal in sensing coil 14.

In access step 170 of FIG. 16, the LUT is then accessed three times to acquire the magnetic field values at the LNP for each of the three unidirectional coils. In calculation step 172, these values and the measured voltage signals are then substituted into the appropriate equations set forth below to solve for the unknown variables θ and φ that define the orientation of sensing coil 14.

By way of background, the time-dependent magnetic fields projected into the navigational domain induce voltages in sensor coil 14 that are representative of the orientation of coil axis a 21 relative to the lines of magnetic flux. The development of an induced voltage in sensing coil 14 in response to a changing magnetic field is defined by Faraday's law. For a closed stationary path in space which is linked by a changing magnetic field, the induced voltage as a function of time V(t) around this path is equal to the negative time rate of change of the total magnetic flux through the closed path (one turn). For an open surface S bounded by a closed path C, the magnetic flux ψ through S is given by,

$ψ^{n} = N \int_{S} μ_{0} H^{n} (t) \cdot \hat{a} ⅆ a$

where μ₀is the magnetic permeability of free space and is a constant, the superscript “n” simply associates a given flux ψⁿwith a given field Hⁿ(t), â is a vector normal to surface S, and da is a differential unit of area, and N is the number of turns in the coil 14. The mathematical statement of Faraday's law is, thus,

$V^{n} (t) = - \frac{ⅆ}{ⅆ t} ψ^{n}$

Within the time period of a measurement of sensing coil 14, neither the surface S, or the closed path C determined by the position of sensing coil 14 are a function of time. Thus,

$V^{n} (t) = - N \int_{S} μ_{0} \frac{\partial H^{n} (t)}{\partial t} • \hat{a} ⅆ a$

For an N-turn coil of wire of radius r located in a uniform amplitude magnetic field generated by coil n in a time varying harmonic field of angular frequency ω, with a sinusoidal waveform Hⁿ(t)=Hⁿexp(−iωt), where coil axis 21 is displaced at an angle ρ with respect to the lines of magnetic flux, i=√{square root over ((−1))}, t is the time, and exp(n) denotes the natural base of logarithms e raised to the power n, the induced voltage measured between the two open ends of the sensing coil 14 is expressed as:

$V^{n} (t) = - N \int_{S} μ_{0} \frac{\partial H^{n} (t)}{\partial t} • \hat{a} ⅆ a = - ω N π r^{2} μ_{0} H^{n} \cos (ρ) \exp (- ⅈ ω t - ⅈ π / 2)$

where Hⁿ=|Hⁿ|. This assumes that each turn of the coil is separately and equally linked by the magnetic flux (e.g., in tightly wound coils), the induced voltage within sensing coil 14 may be approximated as the summation of the induced voltages developed in each turn.

Vⁿ(t)=−Nωπr²μ₀Hⁿcos(ρ)exp(−iωt−iπ/2)

The time dependence and phase of Vⁿ(t) is given by exp(−iωt−iπ/2). Notice that the phase factor of π/2 indicates that the time variation of the induced voltage Vⁿ(t)=−Nωπr²μ₀Hⁿcos(ρ)exp(−iω−iπ/2) lags behind the time variation of the driving magnetic field Hⁿ(t)=Hⁿexp(−iωt) by π/2 radians, or 90°. This time dependence and phase can be factored out to provide a solution for the induced voltage amplitude Vⁿonly, where

Vⁿ(t)=Vⁿexp(−iωt−iπ/2). Thus
Vⁿ(t)=−Nωπr²μ₀Hⁿcos(ρ)

The induced voltage amplitude Vⁿin sensing coil 14 will vary with changes in the angular orientation between the coil axis and the direction of the magnetic field lines ρ.

A useful reference frame for spatially conceptualizing the interaction between sensing coil 14 and the magnetic fields in navigational domain 12 is the Cartesian coordinate system defined by mutually perpendicular axes x-y-z. As above, coil axis 21 is through sensing coil 14.

The angles α, β, γ that the coil axis 21 makes with the unit coordinate vectors x, y, and z respectively, are called the direction angles of coil axis 21; the trigonometric terms cos(α), cos(β) and cos(γ) represent direction cosine values. Employing vector product notation, the following expressions are provided: {circumflex over (α)}·x=cos(α), {circumflex over (α)}·y=cos(β), and {circumflex over (α)}·z=cos(γ). Referencing the induced voltage equations set forth above, these angles α, β, and γ correspond to the angular displacement of coil axis 21 with respect to uniform fields generated along the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis directions, respectively. Thus, the correspondence between direction cosine expressions is as follows:

â·x=cos(α)=sin(φ)cos(θ)
â·y=cos(β)=sin(φ)sin(θ), and
â·z=cos(γ)=cos(φ)

Accordingly, the following relationships illustrate the dependence of induced voltage on the orientation parameters θ, and φ.

V^x=κωH_x^xsin(φ)cos(θ)+κωH_y^xsin(θ)sin(φ)+κωH_z^xcos(φ)

where κ=−Nπr²μ₀and is independent of frequency. The subscripts in the field intensity amplitudes indicate the axial dimension along which the magnetic field amplitude value was determined by accessing the LUT for the given coil set at the LNP, while the superscript in the voltage amplitude and the field intensity terms indicates the field-generating coil set: in this case the x-directed uniform amplitude field. For an x-directed substantially uniform field, the terms H_y^xand H_z^xare small compared to H_x^x. Similar equations are developed below for the induced voltages produced by the unidirectional coils successively generating a y-directed and z-directed substantially uniform field:

V^y=κωH_x^ysin(φ)cos(θ)+κωH_y^ysin(φ)sin(θ)+κωH_z^ycos(φ), and
V^z=κωH_x^zsin(φ)cos(θ)+κωH_y^zsin(φ)sin(θ)+κωH_z^zcos(φ)

As above for the x-directed field, the terms H_x^yand H_z^yin the equation for V^yand the terms H_x^zand H_y^zin the equation for V^Zare small compared to H_y^yand H_z^zrespectively. After substituting the measured values for the induced voltage amplitude signals, the linearly independent equations are simultaneously solved to determine the unknown variables θ and φ defining the orientation of coil axis 21. This corresponds to calculation step 172 of FIG. 16.

Determining the Positional Coordinates of a Probe in the Absence of Extraneous Fields.

This section describes in more detail the position calculation as indicated by the schematic of FIG. 17. To begin with, a sequence of vector gradient fields are generated by successive delta coils. As above, consider a magnetic field waveform that is sinusoidal in nature with angular frequency ω. Each vector gradient field generates a family of constant signal surfaces. The voltage amplitude V_Oⁿis calculated at the LNP, R₀=(x₀, y₀, z₀), from the LUT at the fixed orientation (θ, φ), or v₀ⁿ(x₀, y₀, z₀, θ, φ)exp(−iωt−iπ/2)=−Nωr²μ₀H₀ⁿ·âexp(−iωt−iπ/2) where coil axis {circumflex over (α)} 21 is a unit vector that is normal to the plane determined by sensing coil 14 and is uniquely determined by the orientation variables (θ, φ), and H_Oⁿis the vector magnetic field produced by the “n” coil set and is evaluated at the LNP which is R₀. This corresponds to step 176 of FIG. 17. As noted above, the last navigation point (LNP) refers to the x-y-z positional coordinates of sensing coil 14 as determined by the immediately previous computation cycle. For the first cycle, the LNP is the center of the viewing field. The voltage amplitude V₀ⁿcalculated above is subtracted from the measured value of the voltage amplitude Vⁿat the unknown location R=(x, y, z) at the known fixed orientation (θ, φ) or Vⁿ(x, y, z, θ, φ,). The difference in these amplitude values ΔVⁿV₀ⁿ−Vⁿis related to the dot product of the vector gradient field at the LNP {right arrow over (∇)}H₀ⁿ(R₀) and a displacement vector ΔR=R−R₀=(Δx, Δy, Δz), where the displacement vector ΔR is assumed to be small, in the following manner:

$Δ V^{n} \exp (- ⅈ ω t - ⅈπ / 2) = - N ω r^{2} μ_{0} Δ R \cdot \vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n} \cdot \hat{a}) \exp (- ⅈ ω t - ⅈ π / 2)$

As before, the time dependence and phase exp(−iωt−iπ/2) can be factored out and using κ=−Nπr²μ₁₀₀, we are left with:

ΔVⁿ=κωΔR·{right arrow over (∇)}(H₀ⁿ·â)

In the above equation, ΔVⁿis known, the variables κ and ω are known, as is coil axis a 21. The gradient {right arrow over (∇)}(H₀ⁿ·â) can be calculated from the LUT using standard techniques from numerical methods. Thus, the only unknown that remains is the small displacement vector ΔR which is expressed merely as the difference between the LNP R₀=(x₀, y₀, z₀) and the unknown location vector R=(x, y, z). Thus, a measurement of the amplitude of the voltage across sensor coil 14, provided that {right arrow over (∇)}(H₀ⁿ·â)≠0, provides one with a non-singular equation of a function of

- R=(x, y, z):

$R \cdot \vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n} \cdot \hat{a}) = \frac{Δ V^{n}}{κω} + R_{0} \cdot \vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n} \cdot \hat{a})$

which has the general form A_xⁿx+A_yⁿy+A_zⁿ=Bⁿ

where the variables A_jⁿand Bⁿare constants. Such an equation in general determines a plane in three dimensions. Since it is assumed that the displacement vector ΔR is small, then, for a small region around the LNP R₀=(x₀, y₀, z₀), a small planar portion of the constant signal surface associated with a delta coil and a given sensing coil 14 orientation can be identified.

In particular, if the nth delta coil pair is activated and voltage measurements are taken, where the nth short coil is denoted by n(s) and the nth long coil is denoted by n(L), then the following linearly independent equations can be solved for

$R \cdot \vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n (S)} \cdot \hat{a}) = \frac{Δ V^{n (S)}}{κω} + R_{0} \cdot \vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n (S)} \cdot \hat{a})$

$R \cdot \vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n (L)} \cdot \hat{a}) = \frac{Δ V^{n (L)}}{κω} + R_{0} \cdot \vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n (L)} \cdot \hat{a})$

provided that {right arrow over (∇)}(H₀^n(s)·â)≠0 or {right arrow over (∇)}(H₀^n(L)·â)≠0. Each equation independently determines a small planar region of a constant signal surface, and the simultaneous solution of both of the equations determines a line ℑⁿin three dimensional space on which the unknown point R=(x, y, z) lies. This corresponds to calculation step 180 of FIG. 17. In practice, the delta coil pairs are constructed so that the substantially zero gradient component of both the short coil and the long coil field are in the same direction. Denoting such a direction by cⁿ, this implies by definition that

$\vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n (s)} \cdot c^{n}) = 0, and$

$\vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n (L)} \cdot c^{n}) = 0$

Thus, the line ℑⁿin three dimensional space determined by the above equations is parallel to the vector cⁿ

Based on the above analysis, each delta coil pair provides information for determining a line ℑⁿin three dimensional space upon which the point R=(x, y, z) lies. Notice that, in theory, the point R=(x, y, z) could be determined using only two coil pairs where the orientation of the corresponding vectors c¹and c²are at 90° to each other. However, in practice, three coils are desirable because of the possibility that the orientation of the sensing coil 14 â may be such that

$\vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n (s)} \cdot \hat{a}) = 0, and$

$\vec{\nabla} (H_{0}^{n (L)} \cdot \hat{a}) = 0$

In such a case, the equations generated by such a measurement are not linearly independent of each other, and there is no solution that determines a unique line in three dimensional space. Thus, in practice, three delta coil pairs are used where the orientation of the corresponding vectors c¹, c², and c³are at 120° to each other.

Detailed Description of Extraneous Eddy Current Compensation

This section describes in more detail the eddy current compensation method as indicated by the schematic of FIG. 13.

The measurements of induced voltage amplitudes in sensing coil 14 form the basis for determining position and orientation of sensing coil 14. In practice, extraneous conducting object 23 may be present either in navigational domain 12 or peripheral domain 15 that responds to the fields generated for measurement purposes.

FIG. 20A shows the disposition of the nine coil sets of the examination deck 17; the coil sets are also shown in FIG. 20B where they are schematically represented as 1-9. Also shown in 20B is first conducting object 23, it is subjected to a field H¹(R_d) which is the field produced by coil set #1 at the location of first conducting object 23. This field will induce eddy currents ID that flow in first conducting object 23 and these currents will produce disturbing magnetic fields of their own, these are designated H_D¹(x, y, z). Thus the field present at X, Y, Z, the location of sensing coil 14 has two parts, H¹(X, Y, Z) the desired field upon which navigation is calculated and H_D¹(X, Y, Z) the disturbance. the signal produced in sensing coil 14 also has two components corresponding to the two fields. In order to isolate and separate these, one must understand the characteristics of eddy currents produced in first conducting object 23 of arbitrary shape and characteristics.

FIG. 21A depicts an exemplary disturbance in the form of a metallic ring. This ring will have an inductance L and a resistance R that depend on the dimensions and materials of the ring. The circuit on the right describes the eddy current equivalent, this circuit will have a characteristic time constant τ=L/R and have a level of excitation dependent on the orientation of the incoming field to the axis. FIG. 21B shows an elliptical slab of metal with an off center circular hole cut in it. The eddy current performance of this shape is largely described by three current loops or modes of excitation. These are numbered 1, 2, 3, each of these modes has its' own L, R and τ and its own degree of interaction to an incoming field. the eddy current equivalent is therefore a summation of three circuits each similar to that for the case shown in FIG. 21A. A similar analysis prevails in the case shown in FIG. 21C, which corresponds to a solid square plate. In each of these cases there is a dominant mode (#1) which corresponds to the current circulation around the largest dimensions of the disturbing shape, this gives the largest interaction with the incoming field and also produce the largest field generation. In general, any shape disturbance can always be described as an infinite summation of simple LR circuits.

The first objective in the following description is to show how the dominant mode of any disturbance 23 can be eliminated in its effect of the signal V^N(t) and therefore eliminate its effect on navigation. The second objective is to show how higher order modes can be eliminated.

Dominant Mode Only:

The induced voltage at the sensing coil 14 has two components, the direct coupling from the transmitter coils and the indirect coupling from the first conducting object 23, which gives

$V^{n} (t) = ω \exp (- ⅈ ω t - ⅈ π / 2) η_{0}^{n} + \frac{ω^{2} \exp (- ⅈ ω t - ⅈ π) η_{eddy}^{n} L_{eddy}}{R_{eddy} - ⅈ ω L_{eddy}}$

where the coupling variables

$η_{0}^{n} and η_{eddy}^{n}$

are incorporated to indicate the coupling with the source field and the resulting eddy field respectively. Factoring out the time dependence and the phase factor π/2 as before, where,

Vⁿ(t)=Vⁿexp(−iωt−iπ/2)

the following result is obtained:

$V^{n} = ω η_{0}^{n} - \frac{ⅈ ω^{2} η_{eddy}^{n} L_{eddy}}{R_{eddy} - ⅈ ω L_{eddy}}$

If the variable τ_eddyis defined as:

$τ_{eddy} = \frac{L_{eddy}}{R_{eddy}}$

Then the above equation can be rewritten as:

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω} = η_{0}^{n} - η_{eddy}^{n} \frac{ⅈ ω τ_{eddy}}{1 - ⅈ ω τ_{eddy}}$

This equation can be rewritten in terms of real and imaginary parts:

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω} = η_{0}^{n} + η_{eddy}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{eddy}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{eddy}^{2}} - ⅈ η_{eddy}^{n} \frac{ω τ_{eddy}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{eddy}^{2}}, or$

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω} = η_{0}^{n} + η_{eddy}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{eddy}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{eddy}^{2}} + \exp (- ⅈ π / 2) η_{eddy}^{n} \frac{ω τ_{eddy}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{eddy}^{2}}$

Thus, first conducting object 23 has altered the magnitude of the measured voltage amplitude due to the source coils, at the expected phase shifted point exp(−ωt−iπ/2), by an amount ΔV^n-eddyequal to

$Δ V^{n - eddy} = η_{eddy}^{n} \frac{ω^{3} τ_{eddy}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{eddy}^{2}}$

ΔV^n-eddycontains the two unknowns τ_eddyand

$η^{n_{eddy}} .$

An additional voltage signal is phase shifted by a further or π/2 radians with an amplitude

$V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} :$

$V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} = η_{eddy}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{eddy}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{eddy}^{2}}$

The measured voltage drop Vⁿcan be rewritten as:

$V^{n} = {ωη}_{0}^{n} + ω τ_{eddy} V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} - {iV}_{π / 2}^{n - eddy}$

Thus, if

$V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy}$

and τ_eddyare known, the measured signal Vⁿcan be adjusted for the presence of first conducting object 23 to obtain the adjusted potential drop

$V_{adjst}^{n} = ω η_{0}^{n} .$

Once

$V_{adjst}^{n}$

is obtained, the orientation and position calculations discussed previously can be applied using the LUT in order to obtain the proper orientation and position of sensing coil 14.

The value of the amplitude

$V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy}$

can be obtained directly by measurement, since it lags the expected voltage drop signal by the additional phase of π/2 radians, or 90°. Thus, only τ_eddyneed be determined in order to compensate for an extraneous eddy current.

As before, at least one more linearly independent equation is needed in order to solve for eddy. A second linearly independent equation is obtained by taking a voltage amplitude measurement using a second magnetic field waveform, for example, taking a voltage amplitude measurement at a second angular frequency. Thus, denoting our two angular frequencies by ω₁and ω₂, two linearly independent measurements are obtained:

$V^{n} (ω_{2}) = ω_{1} η_{0}^{n} + ω_{1} τ_{eddy} V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} (ω_{1}) - {iV}_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} (ω_{1})$

$V^{n} (ω_{2}) = ω_{2} η_{0}^{n} + ω_{2} τ_{eddy} V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} (ω_{2}) - {iV}_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} (ω_{2})$

The difference of the amplitudes between the two frequencies with the time dependence and phase that goes as exp(−iωτ−iπ/2) can be written as:

$Re {\frac{V^{n} (ω_{1})}{ω_{1}} - \frac{V^{n} (ω_{2})}{ω_{2}}} = τ_{eddy} {V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} (ω_{1}) - V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} (ω_{2})}$

where “Re” denotes the real part of the enclosed quantity. Meanwhile, the difference of the amplitudes between the two frequencies with the time dependence and phase that goes as exp(−iωτ−iπ) can be written as:

$Im {V^{n} (ω_{1}) - V^{n} (ω_{2})} = {V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} (ω_{2}) - V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy} (ω_{1})}$

where “Im” denotes the imaginary part of the enclosed quantity. Thus:

$τ_{eddy} = \frac{Re {\frac{V^{n} (ω_{2})}{ω_{2}} - \frac{V^{n} (ω_{1})}{ω_{1}}}}{Im {V^{n} (ω_{1}) - V^{n} (ω_{2})}}$

This corresponds to a portion of calculation step 138 of FIG. 13 in one embodiment of the present invention. Therefore, since τ_eddycan be determined according to voltage measurements at two angular frequencies, and since the magnitude of the phase lagged amplitude

$V_{π / 2}^{n - eddy}$

can also be measured, then the adjusted voltage drop to be used with the LUT,

$V_{adjst}^{n} = ω η_{0}^{n},$

can be determined as a function of the measured voltage drop Vⁿ:

$V_{adjst}^{n} = {ωη}_{0}^{n} = Re {V^{n}} + {ωτ}_{eddy} Im {V^{n}}$

This, again, corresponds to calculation step 138 of FIG. 13 in one embodiment of the present invention.

Eddy Current Compensation in the Case of Two Extraneous Conducting Objects

The analysis in the previous section applied to the case a disturbing magnetic field introduced by first conducting object 23. the analysis in this section applies to the case where there is first conducting object 23 and second conducting object 31 where each has, respectively, independent values of τ₁and τ₂.

For the case of first conducting object 23 and second conducting object 31, each with a different value of τ₁and τ₂, respectively, and with different coupling constants: η₁ⁿand η₂ⁿ, the above equation determining

$V_{adjst}^{n} = ω η_{0}^{n}$

changes. In this case, the potential drop measured across sensing coil 14 based on a model consistent with the present invention becomes:

$\begin{matrix} \frac{V^{n}}{ω} = η_{0}^{n} + η_{1}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{1}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{1}^{2}} - ⅈ η_{1}^{n} \frac{{ωτ}_{1}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{1}^{2}} + \\ η_{2}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{2}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{2}^{2}} - ⅈ η_{2}^{n} \frac{{ωτ}_{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{2}^{2}} \end{matrix}$

where η₁ⁿand τ₁correspond to first conducting object 23 and and η₂ⁿand τ₂correspond to second conducting object 31. Thus, for a given real and imaginary measurement of Vⁿacross sensing coil 14, there are 5 unknowns η₀ⁿ, η₁ⁿ, η₂ⁿ, η₁ⁿ, τ₁, and τ₂. By equating the real and imaginary portions of the measurements across sensing coil 14 with the real and imaginary portions of the above equations, there are two linearly independent equations. thus, there are an insufficient number of equations to determine all five of the unknowns η₀ⁿ, η₁ⁿ, η₂ⁿ, η₁ⁿ, τ₁, and τ₂.

A measurement at two frequencies ω₁and ω₂as was outlined above, yields four equations. There are still five unknowns, however. Thus, there are still an insufficient total number of equations to solve for all of the terms and determine

$V_{adjst}^{n} = {ωη}_{0}^{n} .$

A measurement at three frequencies ω₁, ω₂, and ω₃, however, yields a sufficient number of equations in order to determine all of the variables, and allows for the calculation of

$V_{adjst}^{n} = {ωη}_{0}^{n} .$

Specifically, by taking voltage drop measurements across sensing coil 14 at three frequencies, the following equations are obtained:

$\begin{matrix} \frac{V^{n} (ω)}{ω} = η_{0}^{n} + η_{1}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{1}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{1}^{2}} - ⅈ η_{1}^{n} \frac{{ωτ}_{1}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{1}^{2}} + \\ η_{2}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{2}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{2}^{2}} - ⅈ η_{2}^{n} \frac{{ωτ}_{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{2}^{2}} \end{matrix}$

where ω is selected from the set ω=(ω₁, ω₂, ω₃). In the above equations, the unknowns η₁ⁿand η₂ⁿappear as linear coefficients. Therefore, by subtracting a measurement of

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}$

taken by sensing coil 14 from a measurement of

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{2}},$

the above equations can be rewritten in the general form

$η_{1}^{n} = f_{1} (ω_{1}, ω_{2}, τ_{1}, τ_{2}), and$

$η_{2}^{n} = f_{2} (ω_{1}, ω_{2}, τ_{1}, τ_{2})$

where ƒ₁(ω₁, ω₂, τ₁, τ₂) and ƒ₂(ω₁, ω₂, τ₁, τ₂) are polynomial functions of ω₁, ω₂, τ₁, and τ₂.

In addition, by subtracting a measurement of

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}$

taken by sensing coil 14 from a measurement of

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{3}},$

the above equations can also be rewritten in the general form

$η_{1}^{n} = g_{1} (ω_{1}, ω_{3}, τ_{1}, τ_{2}), and$

$η_{2}^{n} = g_{2} (ω_{1}, ω_{3}, τ_{1}, τ_{2})$

where again g₁(ω₁, ω₃, τ₁τ₂) and g₂(ω₁, ω₃, τ₁, τ₂) are polynomial functions of ω₁, ω₃, τ₁, and τ₂. Therefore, the following polymial equations provide two equations with two unknowns:

g₁(ω₁,ω₃,τ₁,τ₂)=ƒ₁(ω₁,ω₃,τ₁,τ₂), and
g₂(ω₁,ω₃,τ₁,τ₂)=ƒ₂(ω₁,ω₃,τ₁, τ₂).

The above two equations can be solved to determine τ₁, and τ₂, and, thus, the value of

$V_{adjst}^{n} = ω η_{0}^{n}$

can be determined in the presence of first conducting object 23 and second conducting object 31. The solution to the above equations yields the adjusted value of the potential drop measurement and corresponds to calculation step 138 of FIG. 13 in one embodiment of the present invention.

Eddy Current Compensation in the Case of Two or More Extraneous Conducting Objects

The general result, consistent with the present invention, is that resolving m values of τ_m, requires m measurements of real and imaginary parts of the potential drop across sensing coil 14, using m different waveforms. For example, measurements of a sinusoidal waveform at the set of frequencies (ω₁, ω₂, . . . ω_m) are sufficient to resolve m values of τ_m. Since each additional conducting body introduces a new variable τ_mand an associated coupling constant η_mⁿ, each additional conducting body introduces two new unknowns. However, a measurement of a potential drop across sensing coil 14 at a new waveform m, including both the real and imaginary portions, yields the required number of two new equations necessary to resolve τ_mand η_mⁿ.

As above, with first conducting object 23 and second conducting object 31, higher order polynomial expressions can be derived and the value of

$V_{adjst}^{n} = {ωη}_{0}^{n}$

can be solved for, consistent with the present invention.

Alternatively, one embodiment of the present invention employs a numerical method to solve for

$V_{adjst}^{n} = {ωη}_{0}^{n} .$

In one embodiment of the present invention, a Taylor series about ω=ω₁can be derived as follows:

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω} = \frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}} + \frac{\partial}{\partial ω} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}) (ω - ω_{1}) + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial ω^{2}} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}) {(ω - ω_{1})}^{2} + R_{3}$

where R₃indicates that the neglected terms are of the third order in the derivative of

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω}, \frac{\partial}{\partial ω} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}})$

denotes a first derivative of the function

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω}$

with respect to ω evaluated at ω=ω₁, and

$\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial ω^{2}} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}})$

denotes a second derivative of the function

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω}$

with respect to ω evaluated at ω=ω₁.

Considering the relationship derived above for the effect of first conducting object 23 and second conducting object 31

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω} = η_{0}^{n} + η_{1}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{1}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{1}^{2}} - i η_{1}^{n} \frac{{ωτ}_{1}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{1}^{2}} + η_{2}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{2}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{2}^{2}} - i η_{2}^{n} \frac{{ωτ}_{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{2}^{2}}$

the term

$η_{0}^{n}$

is the only variable that appears without any associated factors of ω. Thus, collecting similar powers of ω yields the relationship:

$η_{0}^{n} = \frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}} - \frac{\partial}{\partial ω} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}) ω_{1} - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial ω^{2}} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}) ω_{1}^{2} + R_{3} o r$

$V_{adjst}^{n} = V^{n} - \frac{\partial}{\partial ω} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}) ω_{1}^{2} + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial ω^{2}} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}) ω_{1}^{2} + R_{3}$

The quantity Vⁿis measured at sensing coil 14 at a frequency ω₁while the quantity

$\frac{\partial}{\partial ω} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}})$

can be determined from measurements at sensing coil 14 at any two of three frequencies ω₁, ω₂, and ω₃, or using all three frequencies ω₁, ω₂, and ω₃. In addition, the quantity

$\frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial ω^{2}} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}})$

can be determined from measurements at sensing coil 14 at three frequencies ω₁, ω₂, and ω₃. Thus, using measurements at sensing coil 14 at three frequencies ω₁, ω₂, and ω₃, the adjusted value for the potential drop across sensing coil 14 can be determined according to:

$V_{adjst}^{n} = V^{n} - \frac{\partial}{\partial ω} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}) ω_{1}^{2} + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial ω^{2}} (\frac{V^{n}}{ω_{1}}) ω_{1}^{2} + R_{3}$

for the situation where there are multiple conducting objects that induce eddy currents and when there are multiple values of τ_m.

The above example utilized magnetic field waveforms that were sinusoidal in nature at a set of frequencies ω. However, a Taylor series expansion about any suitable waveform variable can be variably derived and is consistent with an embodiment of the present invention.

Eddy Current Compensation Using Singular Value Decomposition

Another embodiment of the present invention utilizes the relationship derived above for the case of first conducting object 23 only:

$V_{adjst}^{n} = {ωη}_{0}^{n} = Re {V^{n}} + {ωτ}_{eddy} Im {V^{n}}$

this equation can be rewritten:

$Re {V^{n}} = V_{adjst}^{n} - {ωτ}^{*} Im {V^{n}}$

where

$Re {V^{n}}$

is determined from a measurement across sensing coil 14,

$Im {V^{n}}$

is also determined from a measurement across sensing coil 14, ω₁is known and both τ* and

$V_{adjst}^{n}$

are unknown. The notation τ* is used here merely to indicate a composite τ_eddythat may be a result from several conducting objects. from the general relationship derived above

$\frac{V^{n}}{ω} = η_{0}^{n} + η_{e d d y}^{n} \frac{ω^{2} τ_{e d dy}^{2}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{e d dy}^{2}} - i η_{e d d y}^{n} \frac{{ωτ}_{e d dy}}{1 + ω^{2} τ_{e d dy}^{2}}$

the next higher order correction appears as to a composite τ* can be written as:

$Re {V^{n}} = V_{adjst}^{n} - ω Im {V^{n}} (τ^{*} + {ωτ}^{**})$

where the notation τ** indicates that it is a correction to the term τ* appearing as a coefficient to ω. the units of τ** correspond to the units of (τ*)².

In the above equation, there are three unknowns τ*, τ**, and

$V_{adjst}^{n} .$

In one embodiment of the present invention, it is found that measurements at sensing coil 14 of

$Re {V^{n}} and Im {V^{n}}$

at four frequencies ω₁, ω₂, ω₃, and ω₄, and which yields four equations

$Re {V^{n}} = V_{adjst}^{n} - ω Im {V^{n}} (τ^{*} + {ωτ}^{**})$

with three unknowns τ*, τ**, and

$V_{adjst}^{n},$

is sufficient to determine

$V_{adjst}^{n}$

with the desired precision. Specifically, the above four equations with three unknowns is solved using singular value decomposition, as described, for example, in Numerical Recipes, Cambridge (1986), by W. H. press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling. This, again, corresponds to calculation step 138 of FIG. 13.

Again, the above example utilized magnetic field waveforms that were sinusoidal in nature at a set of frequencies **. however, a similarly derived relationship about any suitable waveform variable can be utilized and is consistent with an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description of Ferromagnetic and Conductive Object Compensation

This section describes in more detail the ferromagnetic and conductive object compensation method as indicated by the schematic of FIG. 14.

A pure magnetic core is a source of magnetic flux. The primary quality of a pure magnetic core is that it can enhance, or focus, magnetic field flux lines along a preferred direction. With respect to Faraday's Law

$V^{n} (t) = - \int_{S} μ \frac{\partial H^{n} (t)}{\partial τ} \cdot a ⅆ a$

where the quantity on the right is proportional to the time rate of change of magnetic flux, it can be seen that, as a source of flux lines, a pure magnetic object will act to enhance the voltage drop. Thus, for a pure magnetic object with tool coil 19 surrounding the magnetic core, tool coil 19 will produce a voltage drop as a function of a source field Hⁿ(R, t)

$V_{m a g n}^{n} (t) = - T \int_{S_{m a g n}} μ \frac{\partial H^{n} (t)}{\partial τ} \cdot a_{m a g n} ⅆ a_{m a g n}$

where T is a multiplication factor that represents the enhancement of the magnetic flux through tool coil 19.

Surgical tool 108 of FIG. 10 has some qualities of a pure magnetic object, as well as additional properties. Like a pure magnetic object, it can act to enhance the detection of flux lines through the center of tool coil 19 as above. However, it also responds to an applied field in a nonlinear manner, as is indicated on hysteresis graph 100. Furthermore, the additional presence of conductive elements introduce additional fields that are out of phase by π/2 with any enhanced field in the vicinity. Thus, a general form for the voltage drop across tool coil 19 affixed around surgical tool 108:

$V_{f e r r o}^{n} (t) = - (T_{R e} - i T_{I m}) \int_{S_{f e r r o}} μ \frac{\partial H^{n} (t)}{\partial τ} \cdot a_{f e r r o} ⅆ a_{f e r r o}$

where the multiplicative factor now has both a real T_Reand imaginary T_Imcomponent. As before, with the discussion of eddy currents, the voltage drop across tool coil 19 located on surgical tool 108 can be written as:

$V_{ferro}^{n} (t) = ω \exp (- ⅈ ω t - ⅈ π / 2) (T_{Re} - ⅈ T_{Im}) T_{ferro}^{n}$

To understand how the field that affects tool coil 19 located at surgical tool 108 affects sensing coil 14 located at the catheter, consider the above equation for tool coil 19 at surgical tool 108:

$V_{f e r r o}^{n} (t) = - (T_{R e} - i T_{l m}) \int_{S_{f e r r o}} μ \frac{\partial H^{n} (t)}{\partial τ} \cdot a_{f e r r o} ⅆ a_{f e r r o}$

If both the surface area contained by tool coil 19 S_ferroand the normal vector a_ferrowere slowly changed such that they ultimately coincided with the surface area S of sensing coil 14 at the catheter probe sensor and the unit vector associated with sensing coil axis a 21, but all other quantities were kept fixed, including the position—surgical tool 108, the source field that is being integrated over Hⁿ(R, t) would no longer be associated with the multiplicative factor (T_Re−iT_Im). This is the usual source field that can provide orientation and location information. However, ferromagnetic and conductive object 29 still acts as a multiplier of flux lines in this source field along a preferred axis with the factor (T_Re−iT_Im). And so there are two sources of flux to be considered. Thus, the following general equation is obtained for the two sources of flux in this case at sensing coil 14:

$V^{n} (t) = ω \exp (- ⅈ ω t - ⅈ π / 2) η_{0}^{n} + ω \exp (- ⅈ ω t - ⅈ π / 2) (T_{Re} - ⅈ T_{Im}) η_{ferro}^{n}$

where

$η_{ferro}^{n}$

is related to

$Γ_{ferro}^{n}$

by a proportionality constant. As before, Vⁿ(t) is the measured voltage drop across sensing coil 14 located at the catheter.

Again, factoring out the time dependence and the phase factor π/2 as before, where

$v^{n} (t) = V^{n} \exp (- ⅈ ωτ - ⅈ π / 2), and V_{ferro}^{n} (t) = V_{ferro}^{n} \exp (- ⅈ ωτ - ⅈ π / 2)$

the following is obtained:

$V^{n} = {ωη}_{0}^{n} + {ωη}_{ferro}^{n} (T_{Re} - {iT}_{Im}), and V_{ferro}^{n} = ω Γ_{ferro}^{n} (T_{Re} - {iT}_{Im})$

For a suitable choice of K that satisfies the equation:

$Im {V^{n} - {KV}_{ferro}^{n}} = 0$

the precise proportionality constant between

$η_{ferro}^{n} and Γ_{ferro}^{n}$

is obtained. This corresponds to calculation step 156 of FIG. 14. Therefore, the effect of surgical tool 108 can be subtracted out from the voltage measurement induced at the catheter:

$V_{adjst}^{n} = {ωη}_{0}^{n} = V^{n} - K V_{ferro}^{n}$

This corresponds to calculation step 160 of FIG. 14. As before, with first conductive object 23 and an eddy current, the adjusted fields have been obtained to be used with the LUT in order to determine the proper orientation and position.

Detailed Description of Shield Device Compensation

This section describes in more detail the shield device compensation method as indicated by the schematics of FIGS. 15, 18, and 19.

As is evident from the discussion above, small distortions may have negligible results on the navigated position. However, large distortions can cause the system to report larger errors or even fail to compute a position. For a medical application, disturbances can include the operating table, a head-holder or other any number of other metallic items.

With respect to an operating room table, the field coils will necessarily be adjacent to the operating room table. Thus, any field-influencing effect of an operating room table has the potential to create a larger than typical distortion in the fields located in the navigational domain.

In particular, shield device 120 is provided to restrict the propagation of magnetic fields through it, as, for example, a sheet of conductive material. It may be arranged in any suitable geometry that has a fixed relationship to the transmission coils. There are many possible materials that the plate can be made from, such as aluminum, copper or virtually any other conductive material. It is also possible to use materials other than a conductive sheet such as a mesh or strips of material. A further possibility is a plastic of polymer film with a conductive coating.

Shield device 120 should preferably be placed between the transmitter coil array and the disturbance. In an operating room, if the patient were to lay on the transmitter coil array, then shield device 120 could be placed under the array to block effects of the operating table. An additional enhancement could be made by bending the sides of shield device 120 up at an angle to negate the effects of the length of the operating table. Other arrangements for shield device 120 are possible, such as placing it to block the effects of microscopes or C-arms that may be present in the field.

The device alters the fields produced by the transmitter coils. The effect of the device can either be computed from electromagnetic theory, as for example, from “Static and Dynamic Electricity” third edition, Taylor & Francis (1989) by William R. Smythe. The effect could also be measured in a calibration process. Both of these techniques correspond to steps 188 and 192 of FIGS. 18 and 19 respectively. A fixed geometry can be characterized by a fixed alteration of the transmitted field. If the device is to be moved, a dynamic correction of the effect should be performed.

CONCLUSION

Methods and apparatus consistent with the present invention correct for the effects of field-influencing objects on a position and orientation determinations using magnetic fields. The foregoing description of an implementation of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not exhaustive and does not limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practicing the invention. For example, step 144 in FIGS. 13 and 14 was indicated as occurring after all of the coil sets were activated and measured. Step 144, however, can be placed after step 140 in both FIGS. 13 and 14 and is consistent with the present invention. Also, there may be a more efficient manner of processing measurements and calculations in parallel, rather than the linear schematic presented. In addition, the magnetic field was considered to have a sinusoidal waveform at an angular frequency ω, but other examples of waveforms are possible consistent with an embodiment of the present invention, including sawtooth waves, or square waves. Also, in the discussion above with regard to the analysis of voltage signals resulting from multiple waveforms, reference was made to a technique known as singular value decomposition. However, the use of any numerical technique for solving an overspecified equation is consistent with the present invention.

Claims

1. A system for navigating a probe in the presence of a field-influencing object, said system comprising: a sensing coil fixed to the probe operable to be navigated;a tool coil operably connected to a tool;a transmitter operable to radiate field energy sufficient to induce a signal in said sensor, wherein said transmitter includes: (i) three unidirectional coil sets, each of said unidirectional coil sets being driven by a drive unit capable of driving said unidirectional coil sets at a first sinusoidal wave form at a first frequency, and(ii) six delta coil sets, each of said delta coil sets being driven by a drive unit capable of driving said delta coil sets at said first sinusoidal wave form at said first frequency, such that said three unidirectional coil sets and said six delta coil sets produce field energy at said first frequency;a shield operable to reflect said field energy; anda processor operable to determine a location of said sensor based upon said signal induced in said sensor;wherein said shield is placed between said transmitter and the field influencing object to block affects of the field influencing object on the field energy;wherein said tool is a second field-influencing object and said field energy induces a first signal in said sensing coil and a second signal in said tool coil simultaneously;wherein said processor is operable, using said first and second signals, to isolate an affect of the tool on said sensing coil by subtracting a voltage induced in the sensing coil by the tool.
2. The system as defined in claim 1 further comprising a storage device containing information corresponding to said field energy at selected locations, said information including shield information incorporating an effect of said shield at said selected locations.
3. The system as defined in claim 2 wherein said processor is further operable to access said storage device to determine an effect of said shield on said sensor, to thereby permit a substantially precise location of said sensor to be determined despite the presence of the field influencing object.
4. The system as defined in claim 2 wherein said storage device containing said shield information includes a geometry of said shield.
5. The system as defined in claim 1 wherein the sensor is connected to a probe that is selected from a group comprising a flexible catheter, a rigid catheter, a surgical tool, a drill, and a reamer.
6. The system as defined in claim 1 wherein said sensor is fixedly connected to a distal end of a catheter insertable into a selected body cavity of a patient undergoing a surgical procedure.
7. The system as defined in claim 1 wherein said field energy is electro-magnetic field energy.
8. The system as defined in claim 1 wherein said shield is formed of a conductive material.
9. The system as defined in claim 8 wherein said conductive material is selected from a group comprising aluminum, copper, and a polymer film with a conductive coating.
10. The system as defined in claim 1 wherein said shield is formed as a conductive sheet.
11. The system as defined in claim 1 wherein said shield is formed as a conductive mesh.
12. The system as defined in claim 1 wherein said shield is formed from strips of conductive material.
13. The system as defined in claim 1 wherein said shield is fixed relative to said transmitter.
14. The system as defined in claim 13, wherein the shield is a distance from said transmitter.
15. The system as defined in claim 1 wherein said determinable location of said sensor by said processor includes angular orientation and positional coordinates of said sensor.
16. The system of claim 1 wherein said shield is a geometrically shaped thin member positioned adjacent to a navigational domain defined by the transmitter; wherein the shield cancels the effects of the field influencing object positioned beyond the navigational domain.
17. The system as defined in claim 1, wherein the field influencing object is selected from a group comprising an operating table, a microscope, a C-arm, and an instrument having a ferromagnetic and conducting core.
18. A method for navigating a probe in the presence of a field-influencing object, said system comprising: radiating field energy sufficient to induce a signal in a sensor;reducing propagation of said field energy through a shield;storing information values in a look-up-table (LUT) corresponding to said field energy at selected locations wherein the values in the LUT are adjusted with voltage adjustment values incorporating an effect of said shield at said selected locations;accessing said stored information by a processor; anddetermining a location of said sensor be executing instructions with said processor based upon said signal induced in said sensor and said accessed stored information despite the presence of the field influencing object;wherein said field energy is radiated with, (i) three unidirectional coil sets, each of said unidirectional coil sets driven by a drive unit capable of driving said unidirectional coil sets at a first sinusoidal wave form at a first frequency, and(ii) six delta coil sets, each of said delta coil sets driven by a drive unit capable of driving said delta coil sets at said first sinusoidal wave form at said first frequency, such that said three unidirectional coil sets and said six delta coil sets produce field energy at said first frequency.
19. The method as defined in claim 18 further comprising manipulating, for each of the unidirectional and delta coils, values in the LUT stored in the storage device to generate the adjusted values as a predetermined function of said shield, so as to produce nine (9) sets of manipulated magnetic field values as the adjusted values, each corresponding to navigational magnetic energy from one of the unidirectional coils and delta coils.
20. The method as defined in claim 18 wherein the sensor is connected to a probe that is selected from a group comprising a flexible catheter, a rigid catheter, a surgical tool, a drill, and a reamer.
21. The method as defined in claim 18 wherein said sensor is fixedly connected to a distal end of a catheter insertable into a selected body cavity of a patient undergoing a surgical procedure.
22. The method as defined in claim 18 wherein said field energy is electro-magnetic field energy.
23. The method as defined in claim 18 wherein said shield is formed of a conductive material.
24. The method as defined in claim 18 wherein said conductive material is selected from a group comprising aluminum, copper, and a polymer film with a conductive coating.
25. The method as defined in claim 18 wherein said shield is formed as a conductive sheet.
26. The method as defined in claim 18 wherein said shield is formed as a conductive mesh.
27. The method as defined in claim 18 wherein said shield is formed from strips of conductive material.
28. The method as defined in claim 18, wherein the shield is a distance from said transmitter and operable to reflect said field energy radiated from said transmitter.
29. A method for navigating a sensor within a navigational domain in the presence of a field influencing object, said method comprising: generating a field operable to induce a signal in a sensor with a transmitter, wherein the transmitter includes: (i) driving each of three unidirectional coil sets at a first sinusoidal wave form at a first frequency, and(ii) driving each of six delta coil sets at said first sinusoidal wave form at said first frequency, such that said three unidirectional coil sets and said six delta coil sets produce field energy at said first frequency;reflecting the field with a shield that separates a field influencing object from both the transmitter and the sensor, thus forming a reflected field with the shield separate from the field generated with the transmitter;inducing a first signal within the sensor from the produced field energy;inducing a second signal within the sensor from the reflected field energy; anddetermining a location of the sensor at least in part using the first signal and the second signal induced in the sensor with a processor configured to calculate, for each of the unidirectional and delta coil sets, an adjusted signal value as a predetermined function of the first signal and the second signal, so as to produce nine adjusted signal values, each corresponding to field energy from one of the unidirectional coil sets and the delta coil sets.
30. The method of claim 29, further comprising actuating the transmitter to radiate field energy.
31. A system for navigating a probe in the presence of a field-influencing object, said system comprising: a first sensor;a transmitter operable to radiate transmitter field energy sufficient to induce a first signal in said first sensor, wherein said transmitter includes: (i) three unidirectional coil sets, each of said unidirectional coil sets being driven by a drive unit capable of driving said unidirectional coil sets at a first sinusoidal wave form at a first frequency, and(ii) six delta coil sets, each of said delta coil sets being driven by a drive unit capable of driving said delta coil sets at said first sinusoidal wave form at said first frequency, such that said three unidirectional coil sets and said six delta coil sets produce said transmitter field energy at said first frequency;a shield positioned between said transmitter and the field-influencing object to reflect said transmitter field energy to substantially cancel effects of the field-influencing object; anda processor operable to determine a location of said first sensor based upon said first signal induced in said first sensor by calculating for each of the unidirectional and delta coil sets a signal value corresponding to field energy from each of the unidirectional coil sets and the delta coil sets as a part of the first signal;wherein said shield is placed between said transmitter and the field-influencing object to block affects of the field-influencing object on said transmitter field energy.
32. The system of claim 31, further comprising: a storage device containing information corresponding to said transmitter field energy and a reflected field energy at selected locations;wherein said information includes shield information incorporating an effect of said shield at said selected locations;wherein said effect of said shield includes said reflected field reflected from the shield that is separate from said transmitter field energy generated with the transmitter;wherein said processor, in determining the location of the first sensor, is further operable to use a second signal induced in the first sensor based upon said reflected field and for each of the unidirectional and delta coil sets, an adjusted signal value as a predetermined function of the first signal and the second signal, so as to produce nine adjusted signal values, each corresponding to field energy from one of the unidirectional coil sets and the delta coil sets.
33. The system as defined in claim 32 wherein the sensor is connected to a probe operable to be navigated in a human body, wherein the probe is selected from a group comprising a flexible catheter, a rigid catheter, a surgical tool, a drill, and a reamer.
34. The system of claim 33, further comprising: a second sensor affixed to the field-influencing object and the transmitter inducing in said second sensor a third signal in said second sensor;wherein the processor is operable to receive said third signal from said second sensor on said field-influencing object;wherein said processor is operable to access the information in the storage device regarding the transmitter field energy and the reflected field energy;wherein the processor is operable to determine the location of the first sensor based on all of the third signal and the information stored in the storage device.
35. The system as defined in claim 31 wherein said sensor is fixedly connected to a distal end of a catheter insertable into a selected body cavity of a patient undergoing a surgical procedure.
36. The system as defined in claim 31 wherein said field energy is electro-magnetic field energy.
37. The system as defined in claim 31 wherein said shield is formed of a conductive material.
38. The system as defined in claim 37 wherein said conductive material is selected from a group comprising aluminum, copper, and a polymer film with a conductive coating.
39. The system as defined in claim 31 wherein said shield is formed as a conductive sheet.
40. The system as defined in claim 31 wherein said shield is formed as a conductive mesh.
41. The system as defined in claim 31 wherein said shield is formed from strips of conductive material.
42. The system as defined in claim 31 wherein said shield is a geometrically shaped thin member positioned adjacent to a navigational domain defined by the transmitter; wherein the shield cancels the effects of the field influencing object positioned beyond the navigational domain.
43. The system as defined in claim 31 wherein the six delta coil sets include a long coil set and a short coil set, wherein each of the six delta coil sets is positioned about 120 degrees apart around a point.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of United States Provisional Application No. 60/161,991, filed Oct. 28, 1999, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and from which priority is claimed. This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/589,779, filed Jun. 8, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,493,573 the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and from which priority is claimed.

US Referenced Citations (553)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
1576781	Phillips	Mar 1926	A
1735726	Bornhardt	Nov 1929	A
2407845	Nemeyer	Sep 1946	A
2650588	Drew	Sep 1953	A
2697433	Sehnder	Dec 1954	A
3016899	Stenvall	Jan 1962	A
3017887	Heyer	Jan 1962	A
3061936	Dobbeleer	Nov 1962	A
3073310	Mocarski	Jan 1963	A
3109588	Polhemus et al.	Nov 1963	A
3294083	Alderson	Dec 1966	A
3367326	Frazier	Feb 1968	A
3439256	Kähne et al.	Apr 1969	A
3526798	Sandstorm	Sep 1970	A
3577160	White	May 1971	A
3614950	Rabey	Oct 1971	A
3644825	Davis, Jr. et al.	Feb 1972	A
3674014	Tillander	Jul 1972	A
3702935	Carey et al.	Nov 1972	A
3704707	Halloran	Dec 1972	A
3821469	Whetstone et al.	Jun 1974	A
3868565	Kuipers	Feb 1975	A
3941127	Froning	Mar 1976	A
3983474	Kuipers	Sep 1976	A
4017858	Kuipers	Apr 1977	A
4037592	Kronner	Jul 1977	A
4052620	Brunnett	Oct 1977	A
4054881	Raab	Oct 1977	A
4117337	Staats	Sep 1978	A
4137361	Deffeyes et al.	Jan 1979	A
4173228	Van Steenwyk et al.	Nov 1979	A
4182312	Mushabac	Jan 1980	A
4202349	Jones	May 1980	A
4228799	Anichkov et al.	Oct 1980	A
4256112	Kopf et al.	Mar 1981	A
4262306	Renner	Apr 1981	A
4287809	Egli et al.	Sep 1981	A
4298874	Kuipers	Nov 1981	A
4314251	Raab	Feb 1982	A
4317078	Weed et al.	Feb 1982	A
4319136	Jinkins	Mar 1982	A
4328548	Crow et al.	May 1982	A
4328813	Ray	May 1982	A
4339953	Iwasaki	Jul 1982	A
4341220	Perry	Jul 1982	A
4346384	Raab	Aug 1982	A
4358856	Stivender et al.	Nov 1982	A
4368536	Pfeiler	Jan 1983	A
4396885	Constant	Aug 1983	A
4396945	DiMatteo et al.	Aug 1983	A
4403321	DiMarco	Sep 1983	A
4418422	Richter et al.	Nov 1983	A
4419012	Stephenson et al.	Dec 1983	A
4422041	Lienau	Dec 1983	A
4431005	McCormick	Feb 1984	A
4485815	Amplatz	Dec 1984	A
4506676	Duska	Mar 1985	A
4543959	Sepponen	Oct 1985	A
4548208	Niemi	Oct 1985	A
4571834	Fraser et al.	Feb 1986	A
4572198	Codrington	Feb 1986	A
4583538	Onik et al.	Apr 1986	A
4584577	Temple	Apr 1986	A
4608977	Brown	Sep 1986	A
4613866	Blood	Sep 1986	A
4617925	Laitinen	Oct 1986	A
4618978	Cosman	Oct 1986	A
4621628	Bludermann	Nov 1986	A
4625718	Olerud et al.	Dec 1986	A
4638798	Shelden et al.	Jan 1987	A
4642786	Hansen	Feb 1987	A
4645343	Stockdale et al.	Feb 1987	A
4649504	Krouglicof et al.	Mar 1987	A
4651732	Frederick	Mar 1987	A
4653509	Oloff et al.	Mar 1987	A
4659971	Suzuki et al.	Apr 1987	A
4660970	Ferrano	Apr 1987	A
4673352	Hansen	Jun 1987	A
4688037	Krieg	Aug 1987	A
4701049	Beckmann et al.	Oct 1987	A
4705395	Hageniers	Nov 1987	A
4705401	Addleman et al.	Nov 1987	A
4706665	Gouda	Nov 1987	A
4709156	Murphy et al.	Nov 1987	A
4710708	Rorden et al.	Dec 1987	A
4719419	Dawley	Jan 1988	A
4722056	Roberts et al.	Jan 1988	A
4722336	Kim et al.	Feb 1988	A
4723544	Moore et al.	Feb 1988	A
4727565	Ericson	Feb 1988	A
RE32619	Damadian	Mar 1988	E
4733969	Case et al.	Mar 1988	A
4737032	Addleman et al.	Apr 1988	A
4737794	Jones	Apr 1988	A
4737921	Goldwasser et al.	Apr 1988	A
4742356	Kuipers	May 1988	A
4742815	Ninan et al.	May 1988	A
4743770	Lee	May 1988	A
4743771	Sacks et al.	May 1988	A
4745290	Frankel et al.	May 1988	A
4750487	Zanetti	Jun 1988	A
4753528	Hines et al.	Jun 1988	A
4761072	Pryor	Aug 1988	A
4764016	Johansson	Aug 1988	A
4771787	Wurster et al.	Sep 1988	A
4779212	Levy	Oct 1988	A
4782239	Hirose et al.	Nov 1988	A
4788481	Niwa	Nov 1988	A
4791934	Brunnett	Dec 1988	A
4793355	Crum et al.	Dec 1988	A
4794262	Sato et al.	Dec 1988	A
4797907	Anderton	Jan 1989	A
4803976	Frigg et al.	Feb 1989	A
4804261	Kirschen	Feb 1989	A
4805615	Carol	Feb 1989	A
4809694	Ferrara	Mar 1989	A
4821200	Öberg	Apr 1989	A
4821206	Arora	Apr 1989	A
4821731	Martinelli et al.	Apr 1989	A
4822163	Schmidt	Apr 1989	A
4825091	Breyer et al.	Apr 1989	A
4829373	Leberl et al.	May 1989	A
4836778	Baumrind et al.	Jun 1989	A
4838265	Cosman et al.	Jun 1989	A
4841967	Chang et al.	Jun 1989	A
4845771	Wislocki et al.	Jul 1989	A
4849692	Blood	Jul 1989	A
4860331	Williams et al.	Aug 1989	A
4862893	Martinelli	Sep 1989	A
4869247	Howard, III et al.	Sep 1989	A
4875165	Fencil et al.	Oct 1989	A
4875478	Chen	Oct 1989	A
4884566	Mountz et al.	Dec 1989	A
4889526	Rauscher et al.	Dec 1989	A
4896673	Rose et al.	Jan 1990	A
4905698	Strohl, Jr. et al.	Mar 1990	A
4923459	Nambu	May 1990	A
4931056	Ghajar et al.	Jun 1990	A
4945305	Blood	Jul 1990	A
4945914	Allen	Aug 1990	A
4951653	Fry et al.	Aug 1990	A
4955891	Carol	Sep 1990	A
4961422	Marchosky et al.	Oct 1990	A
4977655	Martinelli	Dec 1990	A
4989608	Ratner	Feb 1991	A
4991579	Allen	Feb 1991	A
5002058	Martinelli	Mar 1991	A
5005592	Cartmell	Apr 1991	A
5013317	Cole et al.	May 1991	A
5016639	Allen	May 1991	A
5017139	Mushabac	May 1991	A
5027818	Bova et al.	Jul 1991	A
5030196	Inoue	Jul 1991	A
5030222	Calandruccio et al.	Jul 1991	A
5031203	Trecha	Jul 1991	A
5042486	Pfeiler et al.	Aug 1991	A
5047036	Koutrouvelis	Sep 1991	A
5050608	Watanabe et al.	Sep 1991	A
5054492	Scribner et al.	Oct 1991	A
5057095	Fabian	Oct 1991	A
5059789	Salcudean	Oct 1991	A
5078140	Kwoh	Jan 1992	A
5079699	Tuy et al.	Jan 1992	A
5086401	Glassman et al.	Feb 1992	A
5094241	Allen	Mar 1992	A
5097839	Allen	Mar 1992	A
5098426	Sklar et al.	Mar 1992	A
5099845	Besz et al.	Mar 1992	A
5099846	Hardy	Mar 1992	A
5105829	Fabian et al.	Apr 1992	A
5107839	Houdek et al.	Apr 1992	A
5107843	Aarnio et al.	Apr 1992	A
5107862	Fabian et al.	Apr 1992	A
5109194	Cantaloube	Apr 1992	A
5119817	Allen	Jun 1992	A
5142930	Allen et al.	Sep 1992	A
5143076	Hardy et al.	Sep 1992	A
5152288	Hoenig et al.	Oct 1992	A
5160337	Cosman	Nov 1992	A
5161536	Vilkomerson et al.	Nov 1992	A
5170789	Narayan et al.	Dec 1992	A
5178164	Allen	Jan 1993	A
5178621	Cook et al.	Jan 1993	A
5186174	Schlondorff et al.	Feb 1993	A
5187475	Wagener et al.	Feb 1993	A
5188126	Fabian et al.	Feb 1993	A
5190059	Fabian et al.	Mar 1993	A
5193106	DeSena	Mar 1993	A
5197476	Nowacki et al.	Mar 1993	A
5197965	Cherry et al.	Mar 1993	A
5198768	Keren	Mar 1993	A
5198877	Schulz	Mar 1993	A
5207688	Carol	May 1993	A
5211164	Allen	May 1993	A
5211165	Dumoulin et al.	May 1993	A
5211176	Ishiguro et al.	May 1993	A
5212720	Landi et al.	May 1993	A
5214615	Bauer	May 1993	A
5219351	Teubner et al.	Jun 1993	A
5222499	Allen et al.	Jun 1993	A
5224049	Mushabac	Jun 1993	A
5228442	Imran	Jul 1993	A
5230338	Allen et al.	Jul 1993	A
5230623	Guthrie et al.	Jul 1993	A
5233990	Barnea	Aug 1993	A
5237996	Waldman et al.	Aug 1993	A
5249581	Horbal et al.	Oct 1993	A
5251127	Raab	Oct 1993	A
5251635	Dumoulin et al.	Oct 1993	A
5253647	Takahashi et al.	Oct 1993	A
5255680	Darrow et al.	Oct 1993	A
5257636	White	Nov 1993	A
5257998	Ota et al.	Nov 1993	A
5261404	Mick et al.	Nov 1993	A
5265610	Darrow et al.	Nov 1993	A
5265611	Hoenig et al.	Nov 1993	A
5269759	Hernandez et al.	Dec 1993	A
5271400	Dumoulin et al.	Dec 1993	A
5273025	Sakiyama et al.	Dec 1993	A
5274551	Corby, Jr.	Dec 1993	A
5279309	Taylor et al.	Jan 1994	A
5285787	Machida	Feb 1994	A
5291199	Overman et al.	Mar 1994	A
5291889	Kenet et al.	Mar 1994	A
5295483	Nowacki et al.	Mar 1994	A
5297549	Beatty et al.	Mar 1994	A
5299253	Wessels	Mar 1994	A
5299254	Dancer et al.	Mar 1994	A
5299288	Glassman et al.	Mar 1994	A
5300080	Clayman et al.	Apr 1994	A
5305091	Gelbart et al.	Apr 1994	A
5305203	Raab	Apr 1994	A
5306271	Zinreich et al.	Apr 1994	A
5307072	Jones, Jr.	Apr 1994	A
5309913	Kormos et al.	May 1994	A
5315630	Sturm et al.	May 1994	A
5316024	Hirschi et al.	May 1994	A
5318025	Dumoulin et al.	Jun 1994	A
5320111	Livingston	Jun 1994	A
5325728	Zimmerman et al.	Jul 1994	A
5325873	Hirschi et al.	Jul 1994	A
5329944	Fabian et al.	Jul 1994	A
5330485	Clayman et al.	Jul 1994	A
5333168	Fernandes et al.	Jul 1994	A
5353795	Souza et al.	Oct 1994	A
5353800	Pohndorf et al.	Oct 1994	A
5353807	DeMarco	Oct 1994	A
5359417	Müller et al.	Oct 1994	A
5368030	Zinreich et al.	Nov 1994	A
5371778	Yanof et al.	Dec 1994	A
5375596	Twiss et al.	Dec 1994	A
5377678	Dumoulin et al.	Jan 1995	A
5383454	Bucholz	Jan 1995	A
5385146	Goldreyer	Jan 1995	A
5385148	Lesh et al.	Jan 1995	A
5386828	Owens et al.	Feb 1995	A
5389101	Heilbrun et al.	Feb 1995	A
5391199	Ben-Haim	Feb 1995	A
5394457	Leibinger et al.	Feb 1995	A
5394875	Lewis et al.	Mar 1995	A
5397329	Allen	Mar 1995	A
5398684	Hardy	Mar 1995	A
5399146	Nowacki et al.	Mar 1995	A
5400384	Fernandes et al.	Mar 1995	A
5402801	Taylor	Apr 1995	A
5408409	Glassman et al.	Apr 1995	A
5413573	Koivukangas	May 1995	A
5417210	Funda et al.	May 1995	A
5419325	Dumoulin et al.	May 1995	A
5423334	Jordan	Jun 1995	A
5425367	Shapiro et al.	Jun 1995	A
5425382	Golden et al.	Jun 1995	A
5426683	O'Farrell, Jr. et al.	Jun 1995	A
5426687	Goodall et al.	Jun 1995	A
5427097	Depp	Jun 1995	A
5429132	Guy et al.	Jul 1995	A
5433198	Desai	Jul 1995	A
RE35025	Anderton	Aug 1995	E
5437277	Dumoulin et al.	Aug 1995	A
5443066	Dumoulin et al.	Aug 1995	A
5443489	Ben-Haim	Aug 1995	A
5444756	Pai et al.	Aug 1995	A
5445144	Wodicka et al.	Aug 1995	A
5445150	Dumoulin et al.	Aug 1995	A
5445166	Taylor	Aug 1995	A
5446548	Gerig et al.	Aug 1995	A
5447154	Cinquin et al.	Sep 1995	A
5448610	Yamamoto et al.	Sep 1995	A
5453686	Anderson	Sep 1995	A
5456718	Szymaitis	Oct 1995	A
5457641	Zimmer et al.	Oct 1995	A
5458718	Venkitachalam	Oct 1995	A
5464446	Dreessen et al.	Nov 1995	A
5465714	Scheuing	Nov 1995	A
5469847	Zinreich et al.	Nov 1995	A
5478341	Cook et al.	Dec 1995	A
5478343	Ritter	Dec 1995	A
5480422	Ben-Haim	Jan 1996	A
5480439	Bisek et al.	Jan 1996	A
5483951	Frassica et al.	Jan 1996	A
5483961	Kelly et al.	Jan 1996	A
5485849	Panescu et al.	Jan 1996	A
5487391	Panescu	Jan 1996	A
5487729	Avellanet et al.	Jan 1996	A
5487757	Truckai et al.	Jan 1996	A
5490196	Rudich et al.	Feb 1996	A
5494034	Schlondorff et al.	Feb 1996	A
5503416	Aoki et al.	Apr 1996	A
5513637	Twiss et al.	May 1996	A
5514146	Lam et al.	May 1996	A
5515160	Schulz et al.	May 1996	A
5517990	Kalfas et al.	May 1996	A
5531227	Schneider	Jul 1996	A
5531520	Grimson et al.	Jul 1996	A
5542938	Avellanet et al.	Aug 1996	A
5543951	Moehrmann	Aug 1996	A
5546940	Panescu et al.	Aug 1996	A
5546949	Frazin et al.	Aug 1996	A
5546951	Ben-Haim	Aug 1996	A
5551429	Fitzpatrick et al.	Sep 1996	A
5558091	Acker et al.	Sep 1996	A
5566681	Manwaring et al.	Oct 1996	A
5568384	Robb et al.	Oct 1996	A
5568809	Ben-Haim	Oct 1996	A
5572999	Taylor et al.	Nov 1996	A
5573533	Strul	Nov 1996	A
5575794	Walus et al.	Nov 1996	A
5575798	Koutrouvelis	Nov 1996	A
5583909	Hanover	Dec 1996	A
5588430	Bova et al.	Dec 1996	A
5590215	Allen	Dec 1996	A
5592939	Martinelli	Jan 1997	A
5595193	Walus et al.	Jan 1997	A
5596228	Anderton et al.	Jan 1997	A
5600330	Blood	Feb 1997	A
5603318	Heilbrun et al.	Feb 1997	A
5611025	Lorensen et al.	Mar 1997	A
5617462	Spratt	Apr 1997	A
5617857	Chader et al.	Apr 1997	A
5619261	Anderton	Apr 1997	A
5622169	Golden et al.	Apr 1997	A
5622170	Schulz	Apr 1997	A
5627873	Hanover et al.	May 1997	A
5628315	Vilsmeier et al.	May 1997	A
5630431	Taylor	May 1997	A
5636644	Hart et al.	Jun 1997	A
5638819	Manwaring et al.	Jun 1997	A
5640170	Anderson	Jun 1997	A
5642395	Anderton et al.	Jun 1997	A
5643268	Vilsmeier et al.	Jul 1997	A
5645065	Shapiro et al.	Jul 1997	A
5646524	Gilboa	Jul 1997	A
5647361	Damadian	Jul 1997	A
5662111	Cosman	Sep 1997	A
5664001	Tachibana et al.	Sep 1997	A
5669801	Lee	Sep 1997	A
5674296	Bryan et al.	Oct 1997	A
5676673	Ferre et al.	Oct 1997	A
5681260	Ueda et al.	Oct 1997	A
5682886	Delp et al.	Nov 1997	A
5682890	Kormos et al.	Nov 1997	A
5690108	Chakeres	Nov 1997	A
5694945	Ben-Haim	Dec 1997	A
5695500	Taylor et al.	Dec 1997	A
5695501	Carol et al.	Dec 1997	A
5697377	Wittkampf	Dec 1997	A
5702406	Vilsmeier et al.	Dec 1997	A
5711299	Manwaring et al.	Jan 1998	A
5713946	Ben-Haim	Feb 1998	A
5715822	Watkins	Feb 1998	A
5715836	Kliegis et al.	Feb 1998	A
5718241	Ben-Haim et al.	Feb 1998	A
5727552	Ryan	Mar 1998	A
5727553	Saad	Mar 1998	A
5729129	Acker	Mar 1998	A
5730129	Darrow et al.	Mar 1998	A
5730130	Fitzpatrick et al.	Mar 1998	A
5732703	Kalfas et al.	Mar 1998	A
5735278	Hoult et al.	Apr 1998	A
5738096	Ben-Haim	Apr 1998	A
5740802	Nafis et al.	Apr 1998	A
5740808	Panescu et al.	Apr 1998	A
5741214	Ouchi et al.	Apr 1998	A
5742394	Hansen	Apr 1998	A
5744953	Hansen	Apr 1998	A
5748767	Raab	May 1998	A
5749362	Funda et al.	May 1998	A
5749835	Glantz	May 1998	A
5752513	Acker et al.	May 1998	A
5752976	Duffin et al.	May 1998	A
5755725	Druais	May 1998	A
RE35816	Schulz	Jun 1998	E
5758667	Slettenmark	Jun 1998	A
5760335	Gilboa	Jun 1998	A
5762064	Polvani	Jun 1998	A
5767669	Hansen et al.	Jun 1998	A
5767960	Orman	Jun 1998	A
5769789	Wang et al.	Jun 1998	A
5769843	Abela et al.	Jun 1998	A
5769861	Vilsmeier	Jun 1998	A
5772594	Barrick	Jun 1998	A
5775322	Silverstein et al.	Jul 1998	A
5776064	Kalfas et al.	Jul 1998	A
5777720	Shapiro et al.	Jul 1998	A
5782765	Jonkman	Jul 1998	A
5787886	Kelly et al.	Aug 1998	A
5792055	McKinnon	Aug 1998	A
5795294	Luber et al.	Aug 1998	A
5797849	Vesely et al.	Aug 1998	A
5799055	Peshkin et al.	Aug 1998	A
5799099	Wang et al.	Aug 1998	A
5800352	Ferre et al.	Sep 1998	A
5800535	Howard, III	Sep 1998	A
5802719	O'Farrell, Jr. et al.	Sep 1998	A
5803089	Ferre et al.	Sep 1998	A
5807252	Hassfeld et al.	Sep 1998	A
5810008	Dekel et al.	Sep 1998	A
5810728	Kuhn	Sep 1998	A
5810735	Halperin et al.	Sep 1998	A
5820553	Hughes	Oct 1998	A
5823192	Kalend et al.	Oct 1998	A
5823958	Truppe	Oct 1998	A
5828725	Levinson	Oct 1998	A
5828770	Leis et al.	Oct 1998	A
5829444	Ferre et al.	Nov 1998	A
5831260	Hansen	Nov 1998	A
5833608	Acker	Nov 1998	A
5834759	Glossop	Nov 1998	A
5836954	Heilbrun et al.	Nov 1998	A
5840024	Taniguchi et al.	Nov 1998	A
5840025	Ben-Haim	Nov 1998	A
5843076	Webster, Jr. et al.	Dec 1998	A
5848967	Cosman	Dec 1998	A
5851183	Bucholz	Dec 1998	A
5865846	Bryan et al.	Feb 1999	A
5868674	Glowinski et al.	Feb 1999	A
5868675	Henrion et al.	Feb 1999	A
5871445	Bucholz	Feb 1999	A
5871455	Ueno	Feb 1999	A
5871487	Warner et al.	Feb 1999	A
5873822	Ferre et al.	Feb 1999	A
5882304	Ehnholm et al.	Mar 1999	A
5884410	Prinz	Mar 1999	A
5889834	Vilsmeier et al.	Mar 1999	A
5891034	Bucholz	Apr 1999	A
5891157	Day et al.	Apr 1999	A
5904691	Barnett et al.	May 1999	A
5907395	Schulz et al.	May 1999	A
5913820	Bladen et al.	Jun 1999	A
5920395	Schulz	Jul 1999	A
5921992	Costales et al.	Jul 1999	A
5923727	Navab	Jul 1999	A
5928248	Acker	Jul 1999	A
5938603	Ponzi	Aug 1999	A
5938694	Jaraczewski et al.	Aug 1999	A
5947980	Jensen et al.	Sep 1999	A
5947981	Cosman	Sep 1999	A
5950629	Taylor et al.	Sep 1999	A
5951475	Gueziec et al.	Sep 1999	A
5951571	Audette	Sep 1999	A
5954647	Bova et al.	Sep 1999	A
5957844	Dekel et al.	Sep 1999	A
5964796	Imran	Oct 1999	A
5967980	Ferre et al.	Oct 1999	A
5967982	Barnett	Oct 1999	A
5968047	Reed	Oct 1999	A
5971997	Guthrie et al.	Oct 1999	A
5976156	Taylor et al.	Nov 1999	A
5980535	Barnett et al.	Nov 1999	A
5983126	Wittkampf	Nov 1999	A
5987349	Schulz	Nov 1999	A
5987960	Messner et al.	Nov 1999	A
5999837	Messner et al.	Dec 1999	A
5999840	Grimson et al.	Dec 1999	A
6001130	Bryan et al.	Dec 1999	A
6006126	Cosman	Dec 1999	A
6006127	Van Der Brug et al.	Dec 1999	A
6013087	Adams et al.	Jan 2000	A
6014580	Blume et al.	Jan 2000	A
6016439	Acker	Jan 2000	A
6019725	Vesely et al.	Feb 2000	A
6024695	Taylor et al.	Feb 2000	A
6050724	Schmitz et al.	Apr 2000	A
6059718	Taniguchi et al.	May 2000	A
6063022	Ben-Haim	May 2000	A
6071288	Carol et al.	Jun 2000	A
6073043	Schneider	Jun 2000	A
6076008	Bucholz	Jun 2000	A
6096050	Audette	Aug 2000	A
6104944	Martinelli	Aug 2000	A
6118845	Simon et al.	Sep 2000	A
6122538	Sliwa, Jr. et al.	Sep 2000	A
6122541	Cosman et al.	Sep 2000	A
6131396	Duerr et al.	Oct 2000	A
6139183	Graumann	Oct 2000	A
6147480	Osadchy et al.	Nov 2000	A
6149592	Yanof et al.	Nov 2000	A
6156067	Bryan et al.	Dec 2000	A
6161032	Acker	Dec 2000	A
6165181	Heilbrun et al.	Dec 2000	A
6167296	Shahidi	Dec 2000	A
6172499	Ashe	Jan 2001	B1
6175756	Ferre et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6178345	Vilsmeier et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6194639	Botella et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6201387	Govari	Mar 2001	B1
6201987	Dumoulin	Mar 2001	B1
6203497	Dekel et al.	Mar 2001	B1
6211666	Acker	Apr 2001	B1
6223067	Vilsmeier	Apr 2001	B1
6225805	Damadian et al.	May 2001	B1
6233476	Strommer et al.	May 2001	B1
6246231	Ashe	Jun 2001	B1
6259942	Westermann et al.	Jul 2001	B1
6273896	Franck et al.	Aug 2001	B1
6285902	Kienzle et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6298262	Franck et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6314310	Ben-Haim et al.	Nov 2001	B1
6332089	Acker et al.	Dec 2001	B1
6341231	Ferre et al.	Jan 2002	B1
6351659	Vilsmeier	Feb 2002	B1
6352363	Munger et al.	Mar 2002	B1
6381485	Hunter et al.	Apr 2002	B1
6424856	Vilsmeier et al.	Jul 2002	B1
6427079	Schneider et al.	Jul 2002	B1
6427314	Acker	Aug 2002	B1
6428547	Vilsmeier et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6434415	Foley et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6437567	Schenck et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6445943	Ferre et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6470207	Simon et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6474341	Hunter et al.	Nov 2002	B1
6478802	Kienzle, III et al.	Nov 2002	B2
6484049	Seeley et al.	Nov 2002	B1
6490475	Seeley et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6493573	Martinelli et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6498944	Ben-Haim et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6499488	Hunter et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6516046	Fröhlich et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6527443	Vilsmeier et al.	Mar 2003	B1
6551325	Neubauer et al.	Apr 2003	B2
6584174	Schubert et al.	Jun 2003	B2
6593884	Gilboa et al.	Jul 2003	B1
6609022	Vilsmeier et al.	Aug 2003	B2
6611700	Vilsmeier et al.	Aug 2003	B1
6636757	Jascob et al.	Oct 2003	B1
6640128	Vilsmeier et al.	Oct 2003	B2
6694162	Hartlep	Feb 2004	B2
6701179	Martinelli et al.	Mar 2004	B1
20010007918	Vilsmeier et al.	Jul 2001	A1
20020095081	Vilsmeier	Jul 2002	A1
20040024309	Ferre et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040116803	Jascob et al.	Jun 2004	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (71)

Number	Date	Country
964149	Mar 1975	CA
3042343	Jun 1982	DE
35 08730	Mar 1985	DE
37 17 871	May 1987	DE
38 38011	Nov 1988	DE
3831278	Mar 1989	DE
42 13 426	Apr 1992	DE
42 25 112	Jul 1992	DE
4233978	Apr 1994	DE
197 15 202	Apr 1997	DE
197 47 427	Oct 1997	DE
197 51 761	Nov 1997	DE
198 32 296	Jul 1998	DE
10085137	Jul 2010	DE
0 062 941	Mar 1982	EP
0 119 660	Sep 1984	EP
0 155 857	Jan 1985	EP
0 319 844	Jan 1988	EP
0 326 768	Dec 1988	EP
0419729	Sep 1989	EP
0350996	Jan 1990	EP
0 651 968	Aug 1990	EP
0 427 358	Oct 1990	EP
0 456 103	May 1991	EP
0 581 704	Jul 1993	EP
0655138	Aug 1993	EP
0894473	Jan 1995	EP
0 908 146	Oct 1998	EP
0 930 046	Oct 1998	EP
0993804	Apr 2000	EP
2417970	Feb 1979	FR
2 618 211	Jul 1987	FR
2 094 590	Feb 1982	GB
2 164 856	Oct 1984	GB
61-94639	Oct 1984	JP
62-327	Jun 1985	JP
63-240851	Mar 1987	JP
3-267054	Mar 1990	JP
2765738	Jun 1998	JP
WO 8809151	Dec 1988	WO
WO 8905123	Jun 1989	WO
WO 9005494	May 1990	WO
WO 9103982	Apr 1991	WO
WO 9104711	Apr 1991	WO
WO 9107726	May 1991	WO
WO 9203090	Mar 1992	WO
WO 9206645	Apr 1992	WO
WO 9404938	Mar 1994	WO
WO 9423647	Oct 1994	WO
WO 9424933	Nov 1994	WO
WO 9507055	Mar 1995	WO
WO 9611624	Apr 1996	WO
WO 9632059	Oct 1996	WO
WO 9749453	Jun 1997	WO
WO 9736192	Oct 1997	WO
WO 9808554	Mar 1998	WO
WO 9838908	Sep 1998	WO
WO 9938449	Jan 1999	WO
WO 9915097	Apr 1999	WO
WO 9952094	Apr 1999	WO
WO 9921498	May 1999	WO
WO 9923956	May 1999	WO
WO 9926549	Jun 1999	WO
WO 9927839	Jun 1999	WO
WO 9929253	Jun 1999	WO
WO 9933406	Jul 1999	WO
WO 9937208	Jul 1999	WO
WO 9960939	Dec 1999	WO
WO-0010456	Mar 2000	WO
WO 0130437	May 2001	WO
WO-0130256	May 2001	WO

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20030117135 A1	Jun 2003	US

Provisional Applications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	60161991	Oct 1999	US

Continuations (1)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	09589779	Jun 2000	US
Child	10252258		US

Method and system for navigating a catheter probe in the presence of field-influencing objects

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Term Extension

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

US Referenced Citations (553)

Foreign Referenced Citations (71)

Related Publications (1)

Provisional Applications (1)

Continuations (1)