The present invention is generally related to graphics computer systems. More particularly, the present invention is directed towards fetching instructions from the memory of a graphics computer system.
Recent advances in computer performance have enabled graphic systems to provide more realistic graphical images using personal computers and home video game computers. In such graphic systems, a number of procedures are executed to “render” or draw graphic primitives to the screen of the system. A “graphic primitive” is a basic component of a graphic picture, such as a vertex, polygon, or the like. All graphic pictures are formed with combinations of these graphic primitives. Many procedures may be utilized to perform graphic primitive rendering.
Specialized graphics processing units (e.g., GPUs, etc.) have been developed to optimize the computations required in executing the graphics rendering procedures. The GPUs are configured for high-speed operation and typically incorporate one or more rendering pipelines. The hardware of a typical GPU's rendering pipeline(s) is optimized to support an essentially linear topology, where instructions are fed into the front end of the pipeline and the computed results emerge at the bottom of the pipeline. For example, typical prior art linear pipelines tightly couple instruction fetch operations with the resulting calculation operations. Even with parallel instruction fetches, the calculations are tightly coupled with their corresponding instruction fetches.
To maximize throughput and overall rendering speed, the pipeline architecture is such that the execution hardware of the pipeline is non-stallable. This means intermediate results within the pipeline advance step-by-step through the pipeline with successive clock cycles. The pipeline cannot be stalled by means of wait states or the like. Consequently, the front end of the pipeline, or the instruction fetch portion, is similarly a non-stallable instruction fetch pipeline, where once an address is issued, the instruction fetch will occur and the resulting instruction must either be used or thrown away.
Furthermore, in a multithreaded execution environment, the issue stage of the pipeline (e.g., the pipeline portion typically just below the fetch stage) has a finite amount of instruction storage per processor thread. This storage is used to keep instructions available for all threads executing at all times.
A problem exists in the fact that for a non-stallable pipeline, the finite amount of instruction storage per thread is often insufficient to avoid starving subsequent stages of instructions unless usable instructions are in flight from the instruction cache to the storage of the issue stage. For example, modern GPUs support branches and the like in shader programs executing on the GPU. Branching has the effect of flushing all instructions in the pipeline. Similarly, data dependencies and other types of data hazards often result in stalling the instruction fetch stage, having the effect of backing up the pipeline.
One prior art solution was to keep track of how many instructions were fetched per thread, and then fetch a new instruction when an instruction was issued. This solution can be inefficient due to the timing problems caused by the decision of whether or not to issue (and which thread to issue) can happen late in a cycle, and an instruction fetch state machine typically cannot recover in time to select some other instruction. This solution also had problems when a branch was taken. For example, there was no mechanism to adjust the priority of the flushed thread. Thus, what is required is an efficient mechanism for fetching instructions for non-stalling pipelines.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method and system for non-stalling pipeline instruction fetching from memory. Embodiments of the present invention provide efficient instruction fetching support for a multithreaded execution environment as implemented on one or more non-stalling execution pipelines.
In one embodiment, the present invention is implemented as a graphics instruction fetching method implemented for a processor (e.g., GPU) of a computer system. The GPU supports the execution of a plurality of threads in a multithreaded execution environment. A respective plurality of instructions are fetched (e.g., by an instruction fetch stage) to support the execution of the threads. During runtime, one or more instructions are prefetched for at least one of the threads to a prefetch buffer. The instruction(s) is accessed from the prefetch buffer if required by the thread and discarded if not required by the thread. In this manner, instructions can be speculatively prefetched and stored within the prefetch buffer, where they are subsequently accessed if required.
In one embodiment, respective instructions are prefetched for each thread using a respective program counter. Each of the respective program counters are configured to access a plurality of prefetched instructions for the respective threads.
In one embodiment, a respective priority is assigned to each of the threads and new instructions are prefetched for each of the threads in accordance with the respective priority. Additionally, in one embodiment, a respective age is assigned to each of the threads and new instructions are prefetched for each of the threads in accordance with the respective age.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the Figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of embodiments of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments of the present invention.
Notation and Nomenclature:
Some portions of the detailed descriptions, which follow, are presented in terms of procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, computer executed step, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present invention, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “accessing” or “executing” or “storing” or “rendering” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system (e.g., computer system 100 of
Computer System Platform:
In general, computer system 100 comprises at least one CPU 101 coupled to a system memory 115 and a graphics processor unit (GPU) 110 via one or more busses as shown. Access to the system memory 115 is implemented by a memory controller 116. The GPU 110 is coupled to a display 112. System 100 can be implemented as, for example, a desktop computer system or server computer system, having a powerful general-purpose CPU 101 coupled to a dedicated graphics rendering GPU 110. In such an embodiment, components would be included that are designed to add peripheral buses, specialized graphics memory and system memory, 10 devices, and the like.
It should be appreciated that although the GPU 110 is depicted in
In the system 200 embodiment of
In this manner, a respective plurality of instructions are fetched by the instruction fetch interface 201 and stored into the registers 202-207 to support the execution of the threads A, B, and C. In the present embodiment, the instructions for the threads are issued into the non-stallable pipeline 210 via the issue multiplexer 208.
In the present embodiment, the hardware of the non-stallable pipeline 210 is optimized for maximum throughput and overall rendering speed. The architecture of the pipeline 210 is such that the execution hardware is non-stallable, in that, for example, intermediate results within the pipeline 210 advance step-by-step through the pipeline 210 with successive clock cycles. The pipeline 210 cannot be stalled by means of wait states or the like. In the present embodiment, the “front end” of the pipeline, or the instruction fetch interface 201 and the instruction registers 202-207, are configured to support the instruction demands of the non-stallable pipeline 210.
Referring to the system 300 embodiment, the objective of the speculative prefetch is that if it is known that a given thread has no valid instructions, or has less than other threads, or will be invalidating all of its cached instructions because of a branch, system 300 will fetch for that thread. However, if all thread caches are full, system 300 can speculatively fetch for one of the threads what instruction it thinks will be next, and try to guess which thread will issue next (and thus have room for another instruction).
Thus, one of the current program counters 306 is used to pull an instruction from the instruction RAM 350, for example, for thread A. When this instruction 310 comes out of the instruction RAM 350 (e.g., 2 cycles later), system 300 checks to see if thread A can accept the instruction. If not, the instruction 310 is discarded, and the PC reset for thread A such that system 300 will reattempt. As shown in
In this manner, since the instruction prefetch is pipelined from selecting one of the PCs (threads) on one clock, getting the result of the instruction RAM 350 on another clock, and having the instruction 310 clocked into the pipeline interface 201 on the next, system 300 will have prefetches for multiple threads in flight at any given moment. Thus, in the prior example of prefetching thread A's next instruction, system 300 would have then prefetched thread B on the next clock and thread C on the following, and if thread A is thrown away, system 300 would have gone back and tried again on the cycle after prefetching thread C's instruction.
Control of the multiplexer is implemented through a process state machine 500 (e.g., the steps shown in
It should be noted that the prefetched instructions are speculative. For example, the instruction(s) is accessed from the prefetch buffer 310 if required by the thread (e.g., thread A). If the instruction is not required (e.g., as in a case where thread A branches), the instruction is discarded. In this manner, instructions can be speculatively prefetched and stored within the prefetch buffer 310, where they are subsequently accessed if required.
In one embodiment, a respective priority is assigned to each of the threads A, B, and C and tracked by the registers 401-403. New instructions are prefetched for each of the threads in accordance with the respective priority. Additionally, in one embodiment, a respective age is assigned to each of the threads A, B, and C and tracked by the registers 404-406. New instructions are prefetched for each of the threads A, B, and C also in accordance with the respective age.
Thus, in the present embodiment, the prefetch control registers 301 manages a priority per thread, where each thread can be a priority 0, 1, or 2. For example, priority 0 is generated whenever the count of instructions in the issue unit (e.g., the registers 202-207) is zero, or when a branch is taken (and the count will be knocked to zero on the next clock). Instructions are fetched for priority 0 threads first. If there is more than one priority 0 thread, the oldest priority 0 thread is given preference.
The age maintained by the three age registers 404-406 keeps track of the thread it is associated with, as described above. For example, age 0 holds the thread ID of the youngest thread, and age2 holds the thread ID of the oldest. Typically, one thread ID resides in each age register, and no thread ID resides in more than one.
In this manner, an ordered list of tiebreakers is maintained for the threads A, B, and C. In one embodiment, when a thread is selected, all younger age registers are shifted up, and age 0 is assigned the read thread ID. For example, in the nominal case where the age2 thread is used, this amounts to a simple barrel-shift of the registers age0→age1→age2→age0. However, if the age 1 thread were selected (e.g., because of priority), the age 2 thread remains the same, and age0→age1→age0.
In the present embodiment, there are three priority masks (e.g., pri0, pri1 and pri2) maintained by the registers 401-403. Generally, priority 0 is for when the issue unit (e.g., the registers 202-207) is empty, priority 2 is for when there is no room for any other instructions in the issue unit (and any fetch would be speculative), and priority 1 is the nominal case.
Once all active threads are in the priority 2 state, speculative fetches begin on the oldest thread. If there is an open spot in the issue stage by the time the instruction is fetched out of the instruction RAM 350 (e.g., typically two cycles later), the instruction flows from the prefetch buffer 310 to the issue stage. If not, the instruction is discarded, and the program counter is reset to try again. It should be noted that the number of speculative fetches per thread is dependent upon the specifics of an individual design. For example, one design might allow one speculative fetch per thread while another design might allow two or more speculative fetches per thread. The depth and latency of a given pipeline design is one factor in determining the optimal number of speculative fetches per thread that should be implemented.
Process 500 begins in step 501, where a plurality of threads execute in a multithreaded execution environment of the GPU pipeline (e.g., pipeline 210 of
In step 505, the process 500 determines whether the priority indicates all threads in the issue stage are in a full instruction storage state. As described above, in one embodiment, three priority masks (e.g., pri0, pri1 and pri2) maintained by the registers 401-403 track the instruction storage state. If the issue stage is not full, process 500 proceeds back to step 502, where more instructions are fetched to fill the issue stage. If the issue stage is full, process 500 proceeds to step 506. In step 506, speculative prefetching begins for each of the threads, starting with the oldest thread first. As described above, the age of each active thread is maintained by the age registers 404-406. And in step 507, the priority and the age for each thread is updated as instructions issue to the pipeline 210. After step 507, process 500 returns to step 505 to determine if any thread needs priority 0 or 1 servicing, otherwise process 500 can return to speculative prefetch.
In this manner, the overall effect of the prefetch system of the present invention is that the prefetch system is able to store information from the issue stage, thereby avoiding timing paths, and still keep the non-stallable pipeline full in an array of different instruction execution cases.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3091657 | Stuessel | May 1963 | A |
3614740 | Delagi et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3987291 | Gooding et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4101960 | Stokes et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4541046 | Nagashima et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4566005 | Apperley et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4748585 | Chiarulli et al. | May 1988 | A |
4897717 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4958303 | Assarpour et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4965716 | Sweeney | Oct 1990 | A |
4965751 | Thayer et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4985848 | Pfeiffer et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5040109 | Bowhill et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047975 | Patti et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5175828 | Hall et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179530 | Genusov et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197130 | Chen et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5210834 | Zurawski et al. | May 1993 | A |
5263136 | DeAguiar et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5327369 | Ashkenazi | Jul 1994 | A |
5357623 | Megory-Cohen | Oct 1994 | A |
5375223 | Meyers et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5388206 | Poulton et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5388245 | Wong | Feb 1995 | A |
5418973 | Ellis et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430841 | Tannenbaum et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5430884 | Beard et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432905 | Hsieh et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5517666 | Ohtani et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522080 | Harney | May 1996 | A |
5560030 | Guttag et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561808 | Kuma et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574944 | Stager | Nov 1996 | A |
5627988 | Oldfield | May 1997 | A |
5644753 | Ebrahim et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649173 | Lentz | Jul 1997 | A |
5666169 | Ohki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682552 | Kuboki et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682554 | Harrell | Oct 1997 | A |
5706478 | Dye | Jan 1998 | A |
5754191 | Mills et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761476 | Martell | Jun 1998 | A |
5764243 | Baldwin | Jun 1998 | A |
5784590 | Cohen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784640 | Asghar et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796974 | Goddard et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802574 | Atallah et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809524 | Singh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812147 | Van Hook et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5835788 | Blumer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848254 | Hagersten | Dec 1998 | A |
5920352 | Inoue | Jul 1999 | A |
5925124 | Hilgendorf et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940090 | Wilde | Aug 1999 | A |
5940858 | Green | Aug 1999 | A |
5949410 | Fung | Sep 1999 | A |
5950012 | Shiell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5978838 | Mohamed et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999199 | Larson | Dec 1999 | A |
6009454 | Dummermuth | Dec 1999 | A |
6016474 | Kim et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6041399 | Terada et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049672 | Shiell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073158 | Nally et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092094 | Ireton | Jul 2000 | A |
6108766 | Hahn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112019 | Chamdani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6131152 | Ang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141740 | Mahalingaiah et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144392 | Rogers | Nov 2000 | A |
6150610 | Sutton | Nov 2000 | A |
6189068 | Witt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192073 | Reader et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192458 | Arimilli et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208361 | Gossett | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209078 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222552 | Haas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230254 | Senter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239810 | Van Hook et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247094 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252610 | Hussain | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6292886 | Makineni et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301600 | Petro et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314493 | Luick | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317819 | Morton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351808 | Joy et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370617 | Lu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6437789 | Tidwell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438664 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6480927 | Bauman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490654 | Wickeraad et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496902 | Faanes et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499090 | Hill et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525737 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529201 | Ault et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6597357 | Thomas | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603481 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624818 | Mantor et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629188 | Minkin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631423 | Brown et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631463 | Floyd et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657635 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658447 | Cota-Robles | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674841 | Johns et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6700588 | MacInnis et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715035 | Colglazier et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6732242 | Hill et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6809732 | Zatz et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812929 | Lavelle et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825843 | Allen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825848 | Fu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6839062 | Aronson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6862027 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891543 | Wyatt | May 2005 | B2 |
6915385 | Leasure et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6944744 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952214 | Naegle et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965982 | Nemawarkar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975324 | Valmiki et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976126 | Clegg et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978149 | Morelli et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978457 | Johl et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981106 | Bauman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985151 | Bastos et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7015909 | Morgan, III et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031330 | Bianchini, Jr. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7032097 | Alexander et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035979 | Azevedo et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7148888 | Huang | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151544 | Emberling | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154500 | Heng et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159212 | Schenk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185178 | Barreh et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7202872 | Paltashev et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7260677 | Vartti et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7305540 | Trivedi et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7321787 | Kim | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7334110 | Faanes et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7369815 | Kang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373478 | Yamazaki | May 2008 | B2 |
7406698 | Richardson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412570 | Moll et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7486290 | Kilgariff et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7487305 | Hill et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493452 | Eichenberger et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7545381 | Huang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564460 | Boland et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7750913 | Parenteau et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7777748 | Bakalash et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7852341 | Rouet et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7869835 | Zu | Jan 2011 | B1 |
8020169 | Yamasaki | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8427490 | Luu et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
20010026647 | Morita | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020116595 | Morton | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130874 | Baldwin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144061 | Faanes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194430 | Cho | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001847 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030003943 | Bajikar | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014457 | Desai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016217 | Vlachos et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016844 | Numaoka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031258 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030067473 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030172326 | Coffin, III et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188118 | Jackson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204673 | Venkumahanti et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204680 | Hardage, Jr. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227461 | Hux et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012597 | Zatz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073771 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073773 | Demjanenko | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103253 | Kamei et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040193837 | Devaney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205326 | Sindagi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212730 | MacInnis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215887 | Starke | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221117 | Shelor | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040263519 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050012759 | Valmiki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024369 | Xie | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071722 | Biles | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088448 | Hussain et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050239518 | D'Agostino et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050262332 | Rappoport et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280652 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020843 | Frodsham et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064517 | Oliver | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064547 | Kottapalli et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060103659 | Karandikar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060152519 | Hutchins et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152520 | Gadre et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176308 | Karandikar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176309 | Gadre et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070076010 | Swamy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070130444 | Mitu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070285427 | Morein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016327 | Menon et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080278509 | Washizu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090235051 | Codrescu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20120023149 | Kinsman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29606102 | Jun 1996 | DE |
07-101885 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H08-077347 | Mar 1996 | JP |
H08-153032 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08-297605 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09-287217 | Nov 1997 | JP |
H09-325759 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-222476 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-190447 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-148695 | May 2000 | JP |
2001-022638 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2003-178294 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004-252990 | Sep 2004 | JP |
100262453 | May 2000 | KR |
1998-018215 | Aug 2000 | KR |
413766 | Dec 2000 | TW |
436710 | May 2001 | TW |
442734 | Jun 2001 | TW |
Entry |
---|
Hutchins E., SC10: A Video Processor and Pixel-Shading GPU for Handheld Devices; presented at the Hot Chips conferences on Aug. 23, 2004. |
Wilson D., NVIDIA's Tiny 90nm G71 and G73: GeForce 7900 and 7600 Debut; at http://www.anandtech.com/show/1967/2; dated Sep. 3, 2006, retrieved Jun. 16, 2011. |
Woods J., Nvidia GeForce FX Preview, at http://www.tweak3d.net/reviews/nvidia/nv30preview/1.shtml; dated Nov. 18, 2002; retrieved Jun. 16, 2011. |
NVIDIA Corporation, Technical Brief: Transform and Lighting; dated 1999; month unknown. |
Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online; Definition for “program”; retrieved Dec. 14, 2010. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Video Processor Having Scalar and Vector Components With Command FIFO for Passing Function Calls From Scalar to Vector”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,700, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Stream Processing in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,599, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled: “Multidemnsional Datapath Processing in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,638, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled: “A Latency Tolerant System for Executing Video Processing Operations”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,875, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Lew, et al., Patent Application Entitled “A Programmable Dma Engine for Implementing Memory Transfers for a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,777, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled: “A Pipelined L2 Cache for Memory Transfers for a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,606, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar, et al., Patent Application Entitled: “Command Acceleration in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,640, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar, et al., Patent Application Entitled “A Configurable SIMD Engine in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,393, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar, et al., Patent Application Entitled “Context Switching on a Video Processor Having a Scalar Execution Unit and a Vector Execution Unit”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,778, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Lew, et al., Patent Application Entitled “Multi Context Execution on a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,780, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Su, Z, et al., Patent Application Entitled: “State Machine Control for a Pipelined L2 Cache to Implement Memory Transfers for a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,119, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Kozyrakis, “A Media enhanced vector architecture for embedded memory systems,” Jul. 1999, http://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/techreports/ucb/text/CSD-99/1059.pdf. |
HPL-PD A Parameterized Research Approach—May 31, 2004 http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.trimaran.org/docs/5—hpl-pd.pdf. |
Heirich; Optimal Automatic Mulit-pass Shader Partitioning by Dynamic Programming; Eurographics—Graphics Hardware (2005); Jul. 2005. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Deveopler's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture 1997 p. 8-1. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Deveopler's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture 1999 p. 8-1, 9-1. |
Intel, Intel Pentium III Xeon Processor at 500 and 550Mhz, Feb. 1999. |
Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), defintion of “video”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=video&action=Search, May 23, 2008. |
PCreview, article entitled “What is a Motherboard”, from www.pereview.co.uklarticles/Hardware/What—is—a—Motherboard., Nov. 22, 2005. |
FOLDOC, definition of “separate compilation”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=separate+compilation&action=Search, Feb. 19, 2005. |
Wikipedia, defintion of “vector processor”, http://en.wikipedia.org/, May 14, 2007. |
FOLDOC (Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing), defintion of X86, Feb. 27, 2004. |
FOLDOC, definition of “superscalar,” http://foldoc.org/, Jun. 22, 2009. |
Wikipedia, definition of “scalar processor,” Apr. 4, 2009. |
Wikipedia, entry page defining term “SIMD”, last modified Mar. 17, 2007. |
FOLDOC, Free Online Dictionary of Computing, defintion of SIMD, foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=simd&action=Search, Nov. 4, 1994. |
Definition of “queue” from Free on-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), http://folddoc.org/index.cgi?query=queue&action=Search, May 15, 2007. |
Quinnell, Richard A. “New DSP Architectures Go “Post-Harvard” for Higher Performance and Flexibility” Techonline; posted May 1, 2002. |
Wikipedia, definition of Multiplication, accessed from en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Multiplication&oldid=1890974, published Oct. 13, 2003. |
Hamacher, V. Carl et al., Computer Organization, Second Edition, McGraw Hill, 1984, pp. 1-9. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp. 305. |
Wikipeida, definition of “subroutine”, published Nov. 29, 2003, four pages. |
SearchStorage.com Definitions, “Pipeline Burst Cache,” Jul. 31, 2001, url: http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5—gci214414,00.html. |
Parhami, Behrooz, Computer Arithmetic: Algorithms and Hardware Designs, Oxford University Press, Jun. 2000, pp. 413-418. |
“Vertex Fog”; http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/directx9—c/Vertex—fog.asp?frame=true Mar. 27, 2006. |
“Anti-aliasing”; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-aliasing; Mar. 27, 2006. |
“Alpha Testing State”; http://msdn.microsoff.com/library/en-us/directx9—c/directx/graphics/programmingguide/GettingStarted/Direct3Kdevices/States/renderstates/alphatestingstate.asp Mar. 25, 2005. |
Defintion of “Slot,” http://www.thefreedictionary.com/slot, Oct. 2, 2012. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; English Abstract for Publication No. 100262453, corresponding to application 1019970034995, 2001. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp. 102 and 338. |
Brown, Brian; “Data Structure and Number Systems”; 2000; http://www.ibilce.unesp.br/courseware/datas/data3.htm. |
Definition of “block” from FOLDOC, http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?block, Sep. 23, 2004. |
Definition of “first-in first-out” from FOLDOC, http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=fifo&action=Search, Dec. 6, 1999. |
Definition of “queue” from Free on-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=queue&action=Search, May 15, 2007. |
Duca et al., A Relational Debugging Engine for Graphics Pipeline, International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, pp. 453-463, ISSN:0730-0301. |
Espasa R et al: “Decoupled vector architectures”, High-Performance Computer Architecture, 1996. Proceedings., Second International Symposium on San Jose, CA, USA Feb. 3-7, 1996, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc, US, Feb. 3, 1996, pp. 281-290, XP01 0162067. DOI: 10.11 09/HPCA, 1996.501193 ISBN: 978-0-8186-7237-8. |
Fisher, Joseph A., Very Long Instruction Word Architecture and the ELI-512, ACM, 1993, pp. 140-150. |
FOLDOC (Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing), definition of X86, Feb. 27, 2004. |
FOLDOC, definition of “frame buffer”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=frame+buffer&action=Search, Oct. 3, 1997. |
FOLDOC, definition of “motherboard”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=motherboard&action=Search, Aug. 10, 2000. |
FOLDOC, definition of “separate compilation”, from foldoc.orglindex.cgi?query=separate+compilation&action=Search, Feb. 19, 2005. |
FOLDOC, definition of “superscalar”, http://foldoc.org/, Jun. 22, 2009. |
FOLDOC, definition of “vector processor”, http://foldoc.org/, Sep. 11, 2003. |
FOLDOC, definition of Pentium, Sep. 30, 2003. |
FOLDOC, Free Online Dictionary of Computing, definition of SIMD, foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=simd&action=Search, Nov. 4, 1994. |
Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), definition of “video”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=video&action=Search, May 23, 2008. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Separately Schedulable Condition Codes for a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,793, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
gDEBugger, graphicRemedy, http://www.gremedy.com, Aug. 8, 2006. |
Graf, Rudolf F., Modern Dictionary of Electronics, Howard W. Sams & Company, 1984, pp. 566. |
Graf, Rudolf F., Modern Dictionary of Electronics, Howard W. Sams & Company, 1988, pp. 273. |
Graham, Susan L. et al., Getting Up to Speed: The future of Supercomputing, the National Academies Press, 2005, glossary. |
Graston et al. (Software Pipelining Irregular Loops on the TMS320C6000 VLIW DSP Architecture); Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Languages, compilers and tools for embedded systems; pp. 138-144; Year of Publication: 2001. |
Hamacher, V. Carl et l., Computer Organization, Second Edition, McGraw Hill, 1984, pp. 1-9. |
Heinich; Optimal Automatic Multi-pass Shader Partitioning by Dynamic Programming; Eurographics-Graphics Hardware (2005); Jul. 2005. |
HPL-PD A Parameterized Research Approach—May 31, 2004 http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.trimaran.org/docs/5—hpl-pd.pdf. |
Hutchins E., SC10: A Video Processor and Pixel-Shading GPU for Handheld Devices; presented at the Hot Chips conferences on Aug. 23rd, 2004. |
IBM TDB, Device Queue Management, vol. 31 Iss. 10, pp. 45-50, Mar. 1, 1989. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture 1997 p. 8-1. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture 1999 p. 8-1, 9-1. |
Intel, Intel MMX Technology at a Glance, Jun. 1997. |
Intel, Intel Pentium III Xeon Processor at 500 and 550 Mhz, Feb. 1999. |
Intel, Pentium Processor Family Developer's Manual, 1997, pp. 2-13. |
Intel, Pentium processor with MMX Technology at 233Mhz Performance Brief, Jan. 1998, pp. 3 and 8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060066623 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |