The instant invention relates to computer networking and in particular to a method and system for providing remote access to a state of an application via a computer network.
Healthcare institutions, such as hospitals and diagnostic clinics, utilize information systems such as Hospital Information Systems (HIS), Radiology Information Systems (RIS), Clinical Information Systems (CIS), Picture Archive and Communication Systems (P ACS), Library Information Systems (LIS), Electronic Medical Records (EMR), to name a few. Information stored and processed in such systems includes, for example, patient medical histories, imaging data, test results, diagnosis information, management information, and scheduling information. The information is stored centrally or divided at a plurality of locations of a computer network—typically comprising a client-server architecture. Healthcare practitioners access the patient information or other information at various time instants and locations using sophisticated software application programs to gather, analyze, manipulate, and store data.
For example, using a PACS workstation a radiologist performs an image reading for a diagnosis based on content of diagnostic images and reports the results electronically in a patient application file. Because of the large volume of data and intensive computing requirements, the software used to perform this task typically requires dedicated workstation hardware and high bandwidth network access to the diagnostic images. As a consequence, there is limited or no access to the diagnostic information and analysis capability off-site from the P ACS workstation. This limits the ability of radiologists, technicians, and other specialists who are not on-site to be able to gain access to the necessary software and data to provide timely diagnosis, for example, in an urgent situation.
Presently, this problem is typically overcome by providing remote network access to the screen or console of the workstation hardware, or by downloading sensitive data such as, for example, diagnostic data, to a remote system. In the first case, remote access software does not have any special knowledge of the application programs that are executed and are not able to optimize the presentation of the display of the application program to the user based on the state of the application program—resulting in inefficient use of network bandwidth and poor performance for the remote user. In the second case, the transmission of patient related information to an uncontrolled remote site is a security risk for such sensitive information, and furthermore, in the case of diagnostic imaging data, requires transmission of large amounts of information which is beyond the capacity of many networks.
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method for providing remote access to a state of an application. The method may include providing remote access to an application program being executed on a server computing device by establishing over a network, a remote connection at the server computing device with a client computing device to enable the remote access to the application program; communicating, over the remote connection, a difference program containing data representing a change in a state of the application made by either execution of the application program or the client computing device, the difference program capturing changes in the state of the application program since the state of the application was last received by the server computing device or the client computing device; and synchronizing, between the server computing device and the client computing device, the change in the state of the application using the difference program.
Other systems, methods, features and/or advantages will be or may become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and/or advantages be included within this description and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are now described.
While embodiments of the invention will be described for patient application files in a clinical environment only for the sake of simplicity, it will become evident to those skilled in the art that the embodiments of the invention are not limited thereto, but are applicable in numerous other fields where users remotely access a state of an application program via a computer network.
Referring to
In the system 100 an application program for performing an application associated therewith is executed on processor 104 of the server computer 102, for example, by executing executable commands stored in memory 106. For example, applications enable: viewing and modifying of medical images, viewing and modifying of a patient file, entering a diagnostic report, and scheduling a patient's appointments. A state of an application is changed, for example, when a user changes information in a patient file or requests a different view of a medical image.
For example, using the system 100 a radiologist is enabled to perform an image reading for a diagnosis by remotely accessing an imaging application executed on a dedicated P ACS workstation and to enter a report into a patient file by remotely accessing a patient file application.
Typically, an application such as, for example, the patient file application is processed at different client computers 110A, 110B connected via the communication network 108 to the server computer 102. For example, at client computer 110B a medical practitioner enters his diagnosis of a medical image into the patient application file while at client computer 110A a health care worker enters scheduling information for an appointment into the patient application file. The processing of the same patient file application at two different client computers 110A, 110B results in different states of the patient file application.
The system 100 provides remote access as well as synchronizes the states of an application by executing a method for providing remote access to the state of an application according to embodiments of the invention, as will be described herein below. The method for providing remote access to the state of an application is performed, for example, by executing a remote access program on processors 112A, 112B. For example, the remote access program is performed by executing executable commands stored in memory 114A, 114B. The remote access program is in communication with a remote server access program executed on the processor 104 of the server computer 102, which is in communication with the application program. Alternatively, the remote access program is in direct communication with the application program. When performing the method for providing remote access to the state of an application, the processor of the server computer 102 communicates with respective processors 112A, 112B of the client computers 110A, 110B using standard communication protocols such as, for example, Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP)—of the communication network 108, which are well known to those skilled in the art.
In the method for providing remote access to the state of an application, “view data” of the state of the application are generated and transmitted in a fashion according to hardware capabilities of the client computer—for example, processing capacity, memory size, type of graphical display, and type of user interface. For example, “view data” generated and transmitted for a personal computer are different from “view data” generated and transmitted for a wireless handheld device. For example, during a remote access a user modifies data of a patient file. First, “view data” indicative of the data of the patient file are generated at the server computer and transmitted to the client computer where the “view data” are displayed. The user using a user interface of the client computer then provides data indicative of a change of data of the patient file as “view data” which are then encoded and transmitted to the server computer. The server computer then changes the state of the application in dependence upon the data indicative of a change provided by the user and the application then stores data in dependence thereupon in the patient file stored in a database. Using “view data” enables presentation of the state of an application without transmitting sensitive and/or voluminous diagnostic data and avoids replicating of the application's data processing on the client computer.
Referring to
The difference programs comprise executable commands for execution by a processor. The encoded data are indicative of: a path to the change in the state of the application; a type of the change; and a value of the change. The type of change is, for example, a “modification”, a “deletion”, or an “insertion”, with the value for deletion changes being empty. An example of a difference program is:
Path=“Patient/Name/First”
Type=“Modification”
Value=“Jane”
Path=“Patient/Hobby”
Type=“Insertion”
Value=“Knitting”
Path=“Patient/Career”
Type=“Deletion”
Value=“ ”
The client difference program is then transmitted—16—to the server computer 102 via the communication network 108. At the server computer 102 the client difference program is executed—18—for determining an updated state of the application followed by generating a server difference program. The server difference program has encoded a difference between the updated state of the application and the state of the application last sent to the client computer, 110A. This difference also captures changes, for example, received from another client computer—for example, client computer 110B—or generated due to execution of the application program in dependence upon the executed client difference program for determining the updated state of the application. The server difference program is then transmitted—20—to the client computer 110A via the communication network 108. At the client computer 110A the server difference program is executed—22—for updating the state of the application last received from the server computer 102. Display data indicative of the updated state of the application last received from the server computer 102 are generated—24—and displayed in a human comprehensible fashion on display 116A. Optionally, step 24 is omitted, for example, in situations where the updated state of the application does not affect the data displayed on the display 116A.
Preferably, a remote server access program is executed on the processor 104 of the server computer 102 for executing the client difference program; communicating with the application program for determining the updated state of the application; and generating the server difference program. Provision of the remote server access program enables remote access to off-the-shelf application programs, increases substantially flexibility for the provision of the remote access absent modifications of the application program, and substantially facilitates implementation of the remote access as a retrofit. Alternatively, the application program is enabled to perform the operations of the remote server access program.
Further preferably, the method for providing’ remote access to the state of an application enables limited access to a predetermined portion of the state of the application. For example, the limited access is enabled for:
meeting hardware capabilities for example, processing capacity, memory size, type of graphical display, and type of user interface—of the client computer—for example, the hardware capabilities of a personal computer are substantially different to the hardware capabilities of a wireless handheld device;
being compatible with different operating systems of different client computers; and,
implementing user access restrictions to information for providing different users with different access to the state of an application—for example, an administrative user for scheduling a patient's appointments is prevented from accessing diagnostic information of the patient.
Further preferably, the method for providing remote access to the state of an application enables remote access for a plurality of client computers 110A, 1106, which are, for example, simultaneously, connected to the server computer 102 via the communication network 108 for accessing the state of a same application.
As illustrated in
At the server computer 102 a third server difference program is generated 34. The third server difference program has encoded a difference between the second updated state of the application and the state of the application last sent to the client computer 110A. The third server difference program is then transmitted—36—to the client computer 110A via the communication network 108. At the client computer 110A the third server difference program is executed—38—for updating the state of the application last received from the server computer 102. Display data indicative of the updated state of the application last received from the server computer 102 are generated—40—and displayed in a human comprehensible fashion on display 116A. Optionally, step 40 is omitted, for example, in situations where the updated state of the application does not affect the data displayed on the display 116A. Preferably, the steps 34 to 40 are executed simultaneously to the execution of steps 26 to 32. Alternatively, the steps 34 to 40 are omitted and the changes received from the second client computer 110B are provided to the client computer 110A after receipt of a client difference program from the client computer 110A.
Upon initiation of the remote access for the client computer a state of the application is provided as illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
As is evident to those skilled in the art, the embodiments of the system 100 and method for providing remote access to the state of an application according to the invention have been described with respect to a client-server network architecture comprising two client computers for the sake of simplicity but are not limited thereto and are applicable for other network architectures as well as various numbers of client computers.
The embodiments of the method for providing remote access to the state of an application are performed, for example, by executing executable commands stored in storage mediums—for example, the memory 106 using processor 104 of the server computer 102 and the memory 114A using the processor 112A of the client computer 110A. The executable commands for being stored in the memory of the client computers are, for example, transmitted from the server computer 102 via the communication network 108.
The present invention has been described herein with regard to preferred embodiments. However, it will be obvious to persons skilled in the art that a number of variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as described herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/868,173 filed Jan. 11, 2018, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING REMOTE ACCESS TO A STATE OF AN APPLICATION PROGRAM,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/166,515 filed May 27, 2016, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING REMOTE ACCESS TO A STATE OF AN APPLICATION PROGRAM,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,871,860, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/450,491 filed Aug. 4, 2014, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING REMOTE ACCESS TO A STATE OF AN APPLICATION PROGRAM,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,367,365, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/592,473, filed Nov. 25, 2009, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING REMOTE ACCESS TO A STATE OF AN APPLICATION PROGRAM,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,799,354, and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/193,423 filed Nov. 26, 2008. The disclosure of each of the aforementioned patent applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4975690 | Torres | Dec 1990 | A |
5249121 | Baum | Sep 1993 | A |
5345550 | Bloomfield | Sep 1994 | A |
5491800 | Goldsmith et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5555003 | Montgomery et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5742778 | Hao et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5844553 | Hao et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870559 | Leshem et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5903725 | Colyer | May 1999 | A |
5909545 | Frese, II et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920311 | Anthias | Jul 1999 | A |
5978842 | Noble et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987376 | Olson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996002 | Katsurabayashi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6045048 | Wilz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061689 | Chang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075531 | DeStefano | Jun 2000 | A |
6141698 | Krishnan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145098 | Nouri et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151621 | Colyer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6253228 | Ferris et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6342906 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343313 | Salesky et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6453334 | Vinson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453356 | Sheard et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6529230 | Chong | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6570563 | Honda | May 2003 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602185 | Uchikubo | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6662210 | Carleton et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6698021 | Amini et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6742015 | Bowman-Amuah | May 2004 | B1 |
6748418 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763371 | Jandel | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6792607 | Burd et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6918113 | Patel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6938096 | Greschler et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938212 | Nakamura | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6970459 | Meier | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976077 | Lehew et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981062 | Suryanarayana | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6996605 | Low et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003550 | Cleasby et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7065568 | Bracewell et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069227 | Lintel, III et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073059 | Worely et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7133895 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149761 | Cooke et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152092 | Beams et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7167893 | Malone et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7174504 | Tsao | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181686 | Bahrs | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7191233 | Miller | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193985 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197561 | Lovy et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7240162 | de Vries | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246063 | James et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254634 | Davis et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7287054 | Lee et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7320131 | O'Toole, Jr. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7343310 | Stender | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7346616 | Ramanujam et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350151 | Nakajima | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7356563 | Leichtling et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363342 | Wang et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7418711 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7451196 | de Vries et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7533146 | Kumar | May 2009 | B1 |
7577751 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620901 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624185 | Miller et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647370 | Liu et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7650444 | Dirstine et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656799 | Samuels et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676506 | Reinsch | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703024 | Kautzleben et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706399 | Janczak | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725331 | Schurenberg et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7783568 | Fracchia et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7802183 | Essin | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7810089 | Sundarrajan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831919 | Viljoen et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7921078 | McCuller | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941488 | Goodman et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7950026 | Urbach | May 2011 | B1 |
7966572 | Matthews et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7984115 | Tien et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8010901 | Rogers | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8024523 | de Vries et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8065166 | Maresh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8122341 | Dayan et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8195146 | Prakash et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8239773 | Billman | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8261345 | Hitomi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8356252 | Raman et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359591 | de Vries et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8478307 | Hayes | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8509230 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527591 | Pirnazar | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8527706 | de Vries et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533103 | Certain et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8572178 | Frazzini et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8606952 | Pasetto et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8607158 | Molander et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8627081 | Grimen et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8650154 | Nair | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667054 | Tahan | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8832260 | Raja et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8856259 | Burckart et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8909703 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8910112 | Li et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924512 | Stoyanov et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8935328 | Tumuluri | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9152970 | Trahan | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9239812 | Berlin | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9256856 | Fairs et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
20010006382 | Sevat | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010033299 | Callaway et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037358 | Clubb et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047393 | Arner et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020032751 | Bharadwaj | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032783 | Tuatini | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032804 | Hunt | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020051541 | Glick et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020092029 | Smith | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020198941 | Gavrilescu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014735 | Achlioptas et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023670 | Walrath | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055893 | Sato et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065738 | Yang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120324 | Osborn et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120762 | Yepishin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149721 | Alfonso-Nogueiro et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149941 | Tsao | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163514 | Waldschmidt | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030179230 | Seidman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184584 | Vachuska et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208472 | Pham | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015842 | Nanivadekar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029638 | Hytcheson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039742 | Barsness et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040045017 | Dorner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068516 | Lee et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077347 | Lauber et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103195 | Chalasani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103339 | Chalasani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117804 | Scahill et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128354 | Horikiri et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153525 | Borella | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162876 | Kohavi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183827 | Putterman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040236633 | Knauerhase et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243919 | Muresan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249885 | Petropoulakis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005024 | Samuels et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010871 | Ruthfield et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021687 | Anastassopoulos et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050229 | Comeau et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050114711 | Hesselink et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114789 | Chang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138631 | Bellotti et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154288 | Wang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050188046 | Hickman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188313 | Matthews et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190203 | Gery et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193062 | Komine et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198578 | Agrawala et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216421 | Barry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240906 | Kinderknecht et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246422 | Laning | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004874 | Hutcheson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026006 | Hindle | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031377 | Ng et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031481 | Patrick et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036770 | Hosn et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041686 | Caspi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041891 | Aaron | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066717 | Miceli | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069797 | Abdo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085245 | Takatsuka et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085835 | Istvan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101397 | Mercer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112188 | Albanese et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130069 | Srinivasan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179119 | Kurosawa et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060221081 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060231175 | Vondracek et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236328 | DeWitt | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242254 | Okazaki et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258462 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265689 | Kuznetsov et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271563 | Angelo et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288171 | Tsien | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294418 | Fuchs | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070024645 | Purcell et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070024706 | Brannon et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047535 | Varma | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067754 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079244 | Brugiolo | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112880 | Yang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130292 | Tzruya et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143398 | Graham | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203944 | Batra et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203990 | Townsley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203999 | Townsley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208718 | Javid et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226636 | Carpenter et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233706 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244930 | Bartlette et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244962 | Laadan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244990 | Wells | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256073 | Truong et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282951 | Selimis et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016155 | Khalatian | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028323 | Rosen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080052377 | Light | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080134211 | Cui | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146194 | Yang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159175 | Flack | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183190 | Adcox et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195362 | Belcher et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276183 | Siegrist et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301228 | Flavin | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080313282 | Warila et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320081 | Shriver-Blake et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090070404 | Mazzaferri | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080523 | McDowell | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089742 | Nagulu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094369 | Woolbridge et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106422 | Kriewall | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119644 | de Vries et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164581 | Bove et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172100 | Callanan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187817 | Ivashin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209239 | Montesdeoca | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217177 | DeGrazia | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090254589 | Nair | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090044171 | Avadhanula | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328032 | Crow et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012911 | Akinaga et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017727 | Offer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018827 | Ueda | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100061238 | Godbole et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077058 | Messer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082747 | Yue et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115023 | Peled | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150031 | Allen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174773 | Penner et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205147 | Lee | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223566 | Holmes et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100223661 | Yang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268762 | Pahlavan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268813 | Pahlavan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274858 | Lindberg et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281107 | Fallows et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306642 | Lowet | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110047190 | Lee et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110058052 | Bolton | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110113350 | Carlos et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119716 | Coleman, Sr. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128378 | Raji | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138016 | Jung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138283 | Marston | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145863 | Alsina et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154302 | Balko et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154464 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157196 | Nave et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162062 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184993 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110187652 | Huibers | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191438 | Huibers et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191823 | Huibers | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213830 | Lopez et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219419 | Reisman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222442 | Cole et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223882 | Hellgren | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246891 | Schubert et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252152 | Sherry et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110314093 | Sheu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016904 | Mahajan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023418 | Frields et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030275 | Boller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120072833 | Song et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072835 | Gross et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079080 | Pishevar | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079111 | Luukkala et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084713 | Desai et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120090004 | Jeong | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133675 | McDowell | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151373 | Kominac et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154633 | Rodriguez | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159308 | Tseng et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159356 | Steelberg | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169874 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120210242 | Burckart et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210243 | Uhma et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221792 | de Vries et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226742 | Momchilov et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233555 | Psistakis et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245918 | Overton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246225 | Lemire et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120324032 | Chan | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324358 | Jooste | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331061 | Lininger | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007227 | Hitomi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013671 | Relan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031618 | Momchilov | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130046815 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054679 | Jooste | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070740 | Yovin | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086155 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086156 | McFadzean et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086652 | Kavantzas et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110895 | Valentino et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113833 | Larsson | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117474 | Ajanovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120368 | Miller | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132485 | Thomas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138791 | Thomas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147845 | Xie et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159062 | Stiehl | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159709 | Ivory et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179962 | Arai et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130208966 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212483 | Brakensiek et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130297676 | Binyamin | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140136667 | Gonsalves et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140240524 | Julia et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241229 | Bertorelle et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140258441 | L'Heureux et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298420 | Barton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150026338 | Lehmann et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150067769 | Barton et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150319252 | Momchilov et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2646414 | Oct 2007 | CA |
2697936 | Mar 2009 | CA |
1278623 | Jan 2001 | CN |
1499841 | May 2004 | CN |
101539932 | Sep 2009 | CN |
102129632 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102821413 | Dec 2012 | CN |
0349463 | Jan 1990 | EP |
1422901 | May 2004 | EP |
2007084744 | Mar 1995 | JP |
2002055870 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2004206363 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004287758 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005031807 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005521946 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2008099055 | Apr 2008 | JP |
4405812 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010256972 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2295752 | Mar 2007 | RU |
2298287 | Apr 2007 | RU |
2305860 | Sep 2007 | RU |
1998025666 | Jun 1998 | WO |
1998058478 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2001016724 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2001091482 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2002009106 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2003032569 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003083684 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2008011063 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008087636 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2011087545 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012093330 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012127308 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013024342 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013046016 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013072764 | May 2013 | WO |
2013076554 | May 2013 | WO |
2013109984 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013128284 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013153439 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014033554 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ADASS XXI Conference Schedule, European Southern Observatory, http://www.eso.org/sci/meetings/2011/adass2011/program/schedule.html#day2, Nov. 7, 2011, 4 pages. |
Brandom, R., “Google Photos and the unguessable URL,” The Verge, retrieved on Sep. 25, 2017 from https://www.theverg.com/2015/6/23/8830977/google-photos-security-public-url-privacy-protected, Jun. 23, 2015, 7 pages. |
“Calgary Scientific Revolutionizes Application Sharing and Advanced Collaboration with PureWeb 3.0,” Press Release, Jun. 21, 2011, 3 pages. |
Coffman, Daniel, et al., “A Client-Server Architecture for State-Dependent Dynamic Visualizations on the Web,” IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, 2010, 10 pages. |
Federl, P., “Remote Visualization of Large Multi-dimensional Radio Astronomy Data Sets,” Institute for Space Imaging Science, University of Calgary, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
Federl, P., “Remote Visualization of Large Multi-dimensional Radio Astronomy Data Sets,” Institute for Space Imaging Science, University of Calgary, 2012, pp. 11-22. |
Fraser, N., “Differential Synchronization,” Google, Mountain View, CA, Jan. 2009, 8 pages. |
GoInstant, Shared Browsing Technology, http://website.s3.goinstant.com.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/GoInstant-Shared-Web-Technology.pdf, 2012, 4 pages. |
“GTK 3, Broadway and an HTML5 websocket gui, for free,” retrieved on Sep. 26, 2017 at http://compsci.ca/v3/viewtopic.php?t=36823, Apr. 12, 2014, pp. 1-3. |
Hong, C., et al., “Multimedia Presentation Authoring and Virtual Collaboration in Medicine,” International Journal of Kimics, vol. 8, No. 6, 2010, pp. 690-696. |
Jourdain, Sebastien, et al., “ParaViewWeb: A Web Framework for 3D Visualization and Data Processing,” International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, vol. 3, 2011, pp. 870-877. |
Layers: Capture Every Item on Your Screen as a PSD Layered Image, Internet Website, retrieved on Jun. 30, 2016 at http://web.archive.org/web/20140218111143, 2014, 9 pages. |
Li, S.F., et al., “Integrating Synchronous and Asynchronous Collaboration with Virtual Network Computing,” Internet Computing, IEEE 4.3, 2000, pp. 26-33. |
Luo, Y., et al., “Real Time Multi-User Interaction with 3D Graphics via Communication Networks,” 1998 IEEE Conference on Information Visualization, 1998, 9 pages. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft Press, 5th Edition, Mar. 15, 2002, p. 624. |
Mitchell, J. Ross, et al., A Smartphone Client-Server Teleradiology System for Primary Diagnosis of Acute Stroke, Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 13, Issue 2, 2011, 12 pages. |
ParaViewWeb, KitwarePublic, retrieved on Jan. 27, 2014 from http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaViewWeb, 1 page. |
Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Protocol, 7 pages. |
Remote Desktop Services (RDS), Remote App, retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Services, 9 pages. |
Remote Desktop Services (RDS), Windows Desktop Sharing, retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Services, 9 pages. |
Samesurf web real-time co-browser application, http://i.samesurf.com/i/0586021, 2009, 2 pages. |
Shim, H., et al., Providing Flexible Services for Managing Shared State in Collaborative Systems, Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference, 1997, pp. 237-252. |
Yang, L., et al., “Multirate Control in Internet-Based Control Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 37, No. 2, 2007, pp. 185-192. |
European Search Report, dated Mar. 3, 2015, received in connection with European Patent Application No. 09828497.9. |
Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 16, 2015, received in connection with SG Patent Application No. 2013087150. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190342385 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61193423 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15868173 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16420391 | US | |
Parent | 15166515 | May 2016 | US |
Child | 15868173 | US | |
Parent | 14450491 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 15166515 | US | |
Parent | 12592473 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 14450491 | US |