The invention disclosed herein relates generally to methods and systems for automated mail sorting and, more particularly, methods and systems for the automated sorting of incoming mail.
A number of mail sorting apparatus exist that can handle the sorting of outgoing mail. Few machines exist that can effectively handle the requirements of incoming mail sorting. Quite often, outgoing mail sorting machines are used for incoming mail sorting. These machines have large footprints and are considered costly.
Usually when an organization has volumes of incoming mail that warrant an incoming mail sorting apparatus, they also have a large number of required sort destinations, also known as mailstops, needed as delivery points across their organization. Typically, an organization may have a large number of mailstops thereby requiring a large number of receiving bins in the mail sorting machine. The requirement for a large number of receiving bins increases the cost of these machines. These machines also have very large footprints when outfitted with a substantial number of receiving bins, in comparison to the typical allotment of floor space for mail sorting. When the sorting apparatus has the same number of required sort destinations as it has receiving bins, then the sorting process can be handled with a single-pass of the mailpieces through the apparatus.
There are sorting apparatus that are better suited for incoming sorting when cost and space constraints are a concern. These sorters often have fewer receiving bins than the number of required sort destinations. As a result, the mailpieces need to make multiple passes through the apparatus to get sorted to the proper receiving bin. There are a number of schemes available to maximize the sort process for multi-pass sorting apparatus. In a multi-pass apparatus, the common requirement is to take a portion of the mailpieces from the output end, then manually reload them into the input end of the machine and reprocess the mailpieces further. Multi-pass machines usually have smaller footprints because they have far fewer receiving bins then their single-pass counterparts. This also contributes to their lower cost.
The trade-off for the smaller and less-costly multi-pass machines is that they are considerably slower and more costly to operate because of the labor and time required for processing the mailpieces more than once. Mailpieces in multi-pass machines experience more wear and tear then in a single-pass machine.
It is, therefore, desirable to provide a mail sorting method and system having the ability to sort incoming mailpieces using a single pass process with fewer receiving bins than the number of mailstops being sorted.
A method and system for sorting incoming mail is provided. An embodiment of the system includes a fewer number of receiving bins than the required number of sort destinations or mailstops and can handle the mailpieces using a single-pass sort process. An embodiment of the method includes using sorting algorithms and the automatic discharging of receiving bins to provide single-pass sorting of mailpieces with a fewer number of receiving bins than required sort destinations.
An embodiment of the system includes a mail singulation apparatus to receive the mailpieces to be sorted and to present them to a mail scanning apparatus one at a time. The mail scanning apparatus scans the mailstop address affixed on the mailpieces to identify the mailstop of each mailpiece. On the first mailpiece received, the mailstop is identified and assigned to one of a number of receiving bins by a control system operatively connected to the singulation apparatus and the scanning apparatus. A conveyor apparatus then carries the mailpiece along the conveyor until it reaches to the receiving bin assigned with its mailstop. The conveyor apparatus then deposits the mailpiece into the receiving bin. This process is repeated with each successive mailpiece until all of the receiving bins have been assigned with a mailstop. A control system including a general purpose computer controls the operation of the apparatuses of the system.
If and when a new mailpiece is received and scanned with a new mailstop that is different from the mailstops already assigned to each of the receiving bins, the control system then makes a determination as to which of the receiving bins is to be emptied of its existing contents of mailpieces and be reassigned with the new mailstop. The control system uses an algorithm to make this determination. The algorithm can be influenced by any number of parameters that includes but are not limited to the impending mailpieces to be sorted, historical information related to the sorting operation and operator preferences configured on the control computer to name but a few.
When the control system has determined which receiving bin is to be emptied and reassigned, the control system issues a command to the receiving bin to empty its contents. In some embodiments, the control system can alert an operator that the receiving bin has been emptied. The control system will also inform the operator of the mailstop associated with the contents emptied from the receiving bin. This can be done in a number of ways. One is to print a piece of paper or tag with the mailstop of the contents and deposit the tag with the emptied contents. Another is to dispense a reusable token printed with the mailstop of the contents with the emptied contents. Yet another is to visually display the mailstop on a video display located at the receiving bin that has been emptied. Still another is to audibly broadcast a message containing the mailstop from an audio playback system. Upon identifying the mailstop of the emptied contents, the control system then assigns the new mailstop to the emptied receiving bin and conveys the new mailpiece into that receiving bin.
According to one aspect of the invention, mailpieces are sorted in a single pass by receiving a mailpiece with a mail singulation apparatus, with the mailpiece having a mailstop affixed thereon; identifying the mailstop associated with the mailpiece; assigning the mailstop to one of a plurality of receiving bins if the mailstop has not already been assigned to a receiving bin, each of the receiving bins being capable of emptying its contents upon receiving a command to empty its contents; and conveying the mailpiece to the receiving bin assigned with the mailstop associated with the mailpiece and depositing the mailpiece into the receiving bin.
According to another aspect of the invention, a system for sorting mailpieces in a single pass includes: a mail singulation apparatus adapted for receiving a mailpiece having a mailstop affixed thereon; a mailpiece scanning apparatus for scanning and identifying the mailstop of the mailpiece, with the scanning apparatus operatively coupled to the singulation apparatus; a plurality of receiving bins, each bin capable of emptying its contents upon receiving a command to empty its contents; a conveyor apparatus operatively coupling the singulation apparatus to the plurality of receiving bins, the conveyor apparatus being adapted to carry a mailpiece from the singulation apparatus to any one of the plurality of receiving bins; and a control system operatively coupled to the singulation apparatus, to the scanning apparatus, to each of the plurality of receiving bins and to the conveyor apparatus, wherein the control system is adapted to assign the mailstop to any one of the plurality of receiving bins, the control system further adapted to cause the conveyor apparatus to carry the mailpiece to the receiving bin assigned with the mailstop, the control system further adapted to cause the conveyor apparatus to carry the mailpiece to the receiving bin assigned with the mailstop and deposit the mailpiece into the receiving bin.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a system for sorting mail comprises: first means for receiving a plurality of mailpieces having mailstops affixed thereon and for presenting the mailpieces one at a time; second means for identifying the mailstop of each mailpiece present by the first means, the second means operatively connected to the first means; third means for assigning a mailstop identified by the second means to one of a plurality of receiving bins if the mailstop has not already been assigned to a receiving bin, the third means operatively connected to the first and second means; fourth means for conveying a mailpiece whose mailstop has been identified by the second means and assigned to a receiving bin by the third means to the assigned receiving bin and depositing the mailpiece therein, the fourth means operatively connected to the first, second and third means; and a plurality of receiving bins, each receiving bin adapted to receive mailpieces from the fourth means.
The following is a detailed description of the embodiments of a method and system for sorting mailpieces as shown in the attached figures. For the purposes of this specification, the term “mailpieces” shall refer to all forms of mail including but not limited to envelopes and parcels. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers shall be used throughout to refer to the same or similar elements.
Briefly,
If the answer at step 216 is “no”, the mailstop is added to the mailstop queue at step 220. A mailstop is selected from the queue at step 224 for assignment to a receiving bin. The determination of which mailstop is selected can be made in accordance with any number of predetermined criteria. For example, the determination can be made according to an operator's preferences in configuring the control system. The determination can also be made by the control system basing its decision on the outcome of running an algorithm to select the mailstop.
The algorithm can be based on monitoring at least one piece of information associated with the incoming mailpieces, such as their mailstop address. Alternatively, the algorithm can be based on monitoring at least one piece of information associated with the receiving bins such as the volume of mailpieces being deposited into them. Another criteria can be historical information relating to the past mailpieces received and sorted. Yet another criteria can be based on the position of each mailpiece within the sorting system itself. The algorithm can easily be derived by a person skilled in the art once the criteria has been chosen for selecting mailstops.
Upon the control system selecting a mailstop, the mailstop is removed from the queue at step 228. At step 232, the control system selects a receiving bin to be assigned with the mailstop. As in selecting the mailstop from the mailstop queue, the control system makes a selection upon operator preferences or upon the outcome of processing an algorithm using any number of external criteria or parameters in making a determination as to which receiving bin to select. It should also be obvious to a person skilled in the art that the control system can embody a neural network approach to learn and to adapt as process 200 operates over time in selecting both mailstops and receiving bins.
At step 236, the control system will check if the selected receiving bin has already been assigned with a mailstop. If “yes”, the control system issues a command to the receiving bin at step 240 to empty its contents. At step 244, the control system identifies the emptied contents to the operator whereupon the operator can retrieve the contents and forward the contents to its mailstop destination. Process 200 then proceeds to step 248 whereupon the receiving bin is assigned with the new mailstop. If the answer at step 236 is “no”, the process 200 proceeds from step 236 to step 248. After step 248, process 200 proceeds to step 252 whereupon the mailpieces deposited into the receiving bin. Process 200 then returns to step 208 to process another mailpiece.
Referring to
System 100 comprises feeding unit 107 that feeds mailpieces 101 into singulation unit 102 where the mailpieces are placed on a conveyor one at a time and with the address label facing upwards so it can be scanned. Mailpieces 101 are then fed into scanning unit 103 so that an image can be taken of each mailpiece. An image processing computer 120 is operatively attached to scanning unit 103 with link 123 to control the operation of scanning unit 103 and to process the images taken of mailpieces 101 to determine their mailstop addresses. Image processing computer 120 is a general purpose computer running optical recognition software that works with scanning unit 103 to process the images of scanned mailpieces to determine their mailstop. Such systems and software are well known to those skilled in the art.
System 100 further comprises distribution unit 108 which consists of conveyor sections 105a to 105d and 110, receiving bins 109a to 109d and receptacles 116a to 116d. Static conveyor sections 110 remain fixed in orientation and transport the mail laterally along its belts. Gated conveyor sections 105a to 105d are hinged on one end so that the other end can lift up to expose a receiving bin underneath, and allow a mailpiece to drop therein. A gated conveyor section is positioned above each receiving bin. Receptacles 116a to 116d are positioned beneath receiving bins 109a to 109d, respectively.
A printer 122 is operatively attached to system 100 for printing tags, the purpose of which shall be discussed in further detail below. A system control computer 121 is operatively attached to system 100 by a link 124 to control the operations of the sub components of system 100. System control computer 121 is a general purpose computer having a computer memory with a program code segment stored thereon. The program code segment is adapted to control the operation of system control computer 121 and the operations of system 100 in accordance with process 200 as shown in
The program code segment is further adapted to receive the mailstops of mailpieces identified by scanning unit 103 and assigning these mailstops to receiving bins 109a to 109d. Upon assigning a mailstop to a receiving bin, the program code segment causes system control computer 121 to operate distribution unit 108 to convey the mailpieces to a receiving bin according to their mailstop. When system 100 first starts a sorting process, no receiving bin will be assigned a mailstop until a first mailpiece is processed by scanning unit 103 and image processing computer 120 to determine its mailstop.
Referring to
When a mailpiece enters singulation unit 102 having a mailstop that is different than the mailstop assigned to receiving bin 109a, system 100 will then assign the mailstop to an available receiving bin. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
When a mailpiece with a fifth unique mailstop is presented to system 100, as shown in the figures herein, system control computer 121 will assign the new mailstop to a receiving bin. To do so will require that a receiving bin already assigned with a mailstop empty its contents so that it can be reassigned with the new mailstop and receive mailpieces destined for the new mailstop. This is shown in
Referring to
In one embodiment, system control computer 121 issues a tag indicating the mailstop of the contents in receptacle 116c. This is accomplished by system control computer 121 causing printer 122 to print a piece of paper or tag with the mailstop assigned to receiving bin 109c, mailstop “17”, and deposit the tag onto conveyor section 110. The tag is then conveyed along path 106 and deposited into receiving bin 109c which, in turn, is emptied into receptacle 116c. In this manner, the operator retrieving the contents from receptacle 116c will see the tag and direct the contents to the mailstop printed on the tag. Printer 122 can be a thermo printer although it should be obvious to a person skilled in the art that any comparable printing device will work. In another embodiment, system control computer 121 can additional alert an operator that receiving bin 109c has emptied its contents although this is not essential nor is it necessary.
In addition to the mailstop information, the tag can contain other information such as the number of pieces contained and the route identification number for delivery of the mailpieces. The information printed on the tag can be controlled by predefined settings entered into system control computer 121 by an operator. In other embodiments, printer 122 can be replaced with a token dispenser (not shown) where reusable tokens (not shown) preprinted with mailstop numbers are dispensed onto path 106 to be deposited into the receiving bin with the sorted mailpieces to indicate the mailstop destination to an operator. In other embodiments, visual displays (not shown) or audible play back systems (not shown) can be used in place of printer 122 or token dispensers.
The visual display provides visual information as to the mailstop destination for mailpieces emptied into a receptacle. Alternatively, an audible playback system can audibly inform an operator, using a voice synthesizer, of the mailstop destination and other relevant information. Once receiving bin 109c has been emptied, receiving bin 109c is then available to be reassigned with a new mailstop. In alternate embodiments, the operator is alerted to the fact that receiving bin 109c has been emptied.
In another embodiment, system control computer 121 alerts the operator to manually empty receiving bin 109c. In yet another embodiment, the operator can manually empty receiving bin 109c on his own accord upon which system control computer 121 is informed of which receiving bin has been emptied, either by sensors (not shown) located on distribution unit 108 detecting that a bin is empty or by the operator manually inputting which bin was emptied by pressing a button (not shown) or using a keyboard attached to system control computer 121.
In another embodiment, receiving bin 109c is removed from distribution unit 108 and replaced with a new empty bin instead of being emptied. In yet another embodiment, a replacement bin associated with the new mailstop being assigned by system control computer 121 (not shown) is provided to replace receiving bin 109c. The replacement bin may be empty or may contain mailpieces addressed to the new mailstop being assigned to the bin location where receiving bin 109c was located. This bin replacement process can be performed manually by the operator or it can be automated through additional hardware (not shown) attached to distribution unit 108 that is controllable by system control computer 121.
Referring to
The method and system described herein is shown with only four receiving bins although it will be obvious to a person skilled in the art that any number of receiving bins can be used. The number of receiving bins does not have to be equal to or greater than the number of mailstops contained within a group of mailpieces being sorted, rather, the number of receiving bins can be less than the number of mailstops given the ability of the system to dynamically assign and reassign “m” number of mailstops to “n” number of receiving bins where “m” is greater than “n”.
It is also noted that relationships exist between: a) the number of receiving bins; b) the number of required mailstops contained within the group of mailpieces being sorted; and c) the average number of mailpieces emptied from a receiving bin when it is being reassigned with a new mailstop.
The quotient consisting of a number of required mailstops divided by the number of receiving bins is inversely proportional to the average number of mailpieces emptied from a receiving bin when being reassigned. Furthermore, the average number of mailpieces emptied from a receiving bin is inversely proportional to the frequency of emptying cycles of the receiving bins, at a given input rate of mailpieces. These relationships indicate that the mail sorting system must have at least one receiving bin and that the number of receiving bins does not affect the ability of the system to sort mailpieces. However, the number of receiving bins required by the system is a function of an operator's requirements regarding the average number of mailpieces to be emptied from a receiving bin and on how frequent the receiving bins are to be emptied.
Although a few preferred embodiments have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications might be made without departing from the scope of the invention. The terms and expressions used in the preceding specification have been used herein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5009321 | Keough | Apr 1991 | A |
5042667 | Keough | Aug 1991 | A |
5588520 | Affaticati et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
6079570 | Oppliger et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6126017 | Hours | Oct 2000 | A |
6227378 | Jones et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6478138 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6566620 | Lohmann | May 2003 | B1 |
6888084 | Bayer | May 2005 | B1 |
20030201212 | Reed | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208298 | Edmonds | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040035762 | Brown | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065595 | Hanson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040065596 | Hanson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040065597 | Hanson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060016738 | Norris et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060124512 | Quine et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1061000 | Aug 1979 | CA |
1062811 | Sep 1979 | CA |
2434261 | Jul 2002 | CA |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070272601 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |