1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system for providing hearing assistance to a user, comprising a microphone arrangement for capturing audio signals, an central signal processing unit for processing the captured audio signals, and means for transmitting the processed audio signals via a wireless audio link to means worn at or in at least one of the user's ears for stimulating the hearing of the user according to the processed audio signals.
2. Description of Related Art
Usually in such systems the wireless audio link is an FM radio link. The benefit of such systems is that sound captured by a remote microphone at the transmission unit can be presented at a high sound pressure level and good signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to the hearing of the user wearing the receiver unit at his ear(s).
According to one typical application of such wireless audio systems, the stimulating means is a loudspeaker which is part of a receiver unit or is connected thereto. Such systems are particularly helpful for being used in teaching e.g. (a) normal-hearing children suffering from auditory processing disorders (APD), (b) children suffering a unilateral loss (one deteriorated ear), or (c) children with a mild hearing loss, wherein the teacher's voice is captured by the microphone of the transmission unit, and the corresponding audio signals are transmitted to and reproduced by the receiver unit worn by the child, so that the teacher's voice can be heard by the child at an enhanced level, in particular with respect to the background noise level prevailing in the classroom. It is well known that presentation of the teacher's voice at such enhanced level supports the child in listening to the teacher.
According to another typical application of wireless audio systems the receiver unit is connected to or integrated into a hearing instrument, such as a hearing aid. The benefit of such systems is that the microphone of the hearing instrument can be supplemented with or replaced by the remote microphone which produces audio signals which are transmitted wirelessly to the FM receiver and thus to the hearing instrument. FM systems have been standard equipment for children with hearing loss (wearing hearing aids) and deaf children (implanted with a cochlear implant) in educational settings for many years.
Hearing impaired adults are also increasingly using FM systems. They typically use a sophisticated transmitter which can (a) be pointed to the audio-source of interest (during e.g. cocktail parties), (b) put on a table (e.g. in a restaurant or a business meeting), or (c) put around the neck of a partner/speaker and receivers that are connected to or integrated into the hearing aids. Some transmitters even have an integrated Bluetooth module giving the hearing impaired adult the possibility to connect wirelessly with devices such as cell phones, laptops etc.
The merit of wireless audio systems lies in the fact that a microphone placed a few inches from the mouth of a person speaking receives speech at a much higher level than one placed several feet away. This increase in speech level corresponds to an increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to the direct wireless connection to the listener's amplification system. The resulting improvements of signal level and SNR in the listener's ear are recognized as the primary benefits of FM radio systems, as hearing-impaired individuals are at a significant disadvantage when processing signals with a poor acoustical SNR.
CA 2 422 449 A2 relates to a communication system comprising an FM receiver for a hearing aid, wherein audio signals may be transmitted from a plurality of transmitters via an analog FM audio link.
Usually the remote wireless microphone of a wireless hearing assistance system is a portable or hand-held device which may be used in multiple environments and conditions: (a) the remote microphone may be held by the hearing-impaired person and pointed towards the desired audio source, such as in a one-to-one conversation to the interlocutor; (b) the remote microphone may be worn around the neck; (c) the remote microphone may be put on a table in a conference or restaurant situation; (d) an external microphone may be connected to the system, which may be worn, for example, in the manner of a lapel microphone or a boom microphone; (e) an external audio source, such as a music player, may be connected to the system.
Usually, the audio signal processing schemes implemented in such wireless systems are a compromise between all wearing modes and operation options. Typically, these signal processing schemes, in particular, the gain model, are fixed, apart from the user's possibility to manually choose between a few beam forming and noise canceling options, which are commonly referred to as different “zoom” positions.
For hearing instruments it is known to perform an analysis of the present acoustic environment (“classifier”) based on the audio signals captured by the internal microphone of the hearing instrument in order to select the most appropriate audio signal processing scheme, in particular with regard to the compression characteristics, for the audio signal processing within the hearing instrument based on the result of the acoustic environment analysis. Examples of classifier approaches are found in US 2002/0090098 A1, US 2007/0140512 A1, EP 1 326 478 A2 and EP 1 691 576 A2.
In EP 1 691 574 A2 and EP 1 819 195 A2 wireless hearing assistance systems are described, comprising a transmission unit including a beamformer microphone arrangement and a hearing instrument, wherein a classifier for analyzing the acoustic environment is located in the transmission unit and wherein the result provided by the classifier is used to adjust the gain applied to the audio signals captured by the beam former microphone arrangement in the transmission unit and/or in the receiver unit/hearing instrument.
EP 1 083 769 A1 relates to a hearing aid system comprising a sensor for capturing the movements of the user's body, such as an acceleration sensor, wherein the information provided by such sensor is used in a speech recognition process applied to audio signals captured by the microphone of the hearing aid.
EP 0 567 535 B1 relates to a hearing aid comprising an accelerometer for capturing mechanical vibrations of the hearing aid housing in order to subtract the accelerometer signal from the audio signals captured by the internal microphone of the hearing aid.
WO 2007/082579 A2 relates to a hearing protection system comprising two earplugs, which each comprise a microphone and a loudspeaker connected by wires to a common central audio signal processing unit worn around at the user's body. A detector is provided for detecting whether external audio signals are provided to the central audio signal processing unit from an external communication device connected to the central audio signal processing unit. The output signal of the detector is used to select an audio signal processing mode of the central audio signal processing unit.
US 2004/0136522 A1 relates to a hearing protection system comprising two hearing protection headphones which both comprise an active-noise-reduction unit. The headphones also comprise a loudspeaker for reproducing external audio signals supplied from external communication devices. The system also comprises a boom microphone. A device detector is provided for controlling the supply of power to the boom microphone depending on whether a external communication device is connected to the system.
US 2002/0106094 A1 relates to a hearing aid comprising in internal and a wireless external microphone. A connection detection circuit is provided for activating the power supply of the external microphone once the external microphone is electrically separated from the hearing aid.
It is an object of the invention to provide for a method for providing hearing assistance using a wireless microphone arrangement, wherein the listening comfort, such as the signal to noise ratio (SNR), should be optimized at any time. It is a further object of the invention to provide for a corresponding wireless hearing assistance system.
According to the invention, these objects are obtained by a method as defined in claim 1 and by a system as defined in claim 19, respectively.
The invention is beneficial in that, by estimating whether a certain type of external audio signal supply device is connected to the central signal processing unit and selecting an audio signal processing scheme according to the estimated type of external audio signal supply device, the processing of the audio signals captured by the microphone arrangement can be automatically adjusted to the present use situation of the system.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are defined in the dependent claims.
These and further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings which, for purposes of illustration only, show several embodiments in accordance with the present invention.
The hearing instrument 16 usually will be a hearing aid, such as of the BTE (Behind The Ear)-type, the ITE (In The Ear)-type or the CIC (Completely In the Canal)-type. Typically, the hearing instrument 16 comprises one or more microphones 20, a central unit 22 for performing audio signal processing and for controlling the hearing instrument 16, a power amplifier 24 and a loudspeaker 26.
The transmission unit 10 comprises a transmitter 30 and an antenna 32 for transmitting audio signals processed in a central signal processing unit 28 via a wireless link 34 to the receiver unit 14, which comprises an antenna 36, a receiver 38 and a signal processing unit 40 for receiving the audio signals transmitted via the link 34 in order to supply them to the hearing instrument 16 or the speaker 18. The wireless audio link 34 preferably is an FM (frequency modulation) link.
Rather than consisting of a receiver unit 14 connected to a hearing instrument 16 the ear unit 12, as an alternative, may consist of a hearing instrument 16′ into which the functionality of the receiver unit 14, i.e. the antenna 36 and the receiver 38, is integrated. Such an alternative is also schematically shown in
The transmission unit 10 comprises a microphone arrangement 42, which usually comprises at least two spaced-apart microphones M1 and M2, an audio input 44 for connecting an external audio source 46, e.g. a music player, or an external microphone 48 to the transmission unit 10, a distance sensor 50, an acceleration sensor 52 and an orientation sensor 54. In addition, the transmission unit 10 may comprise a second audio input 44′, so that, for example, the external audio source 46 and the external microphone 48 my be connected at the same time to the transmission unit 10. The transmission unit 10 also may comprise an auxiliary microphone 56 in close mechanical and acoustical contact with the housing of the transmission unit 10 for capturing audio signals representative of body noise and/or housing noise. The external microphone 48 may comprise one or several capsules, the signals of which are further processed in the central signal processing unit 28. The transmission unit 10 also comprises a unit 66 which is capable of determining whether and which type of an external audio signal source 46 is connected to the audio input 44 and to estimate the type of a external microphone 48, when connected to the audio input 44, by sensing at least one electrical parameter, such as the impedance of the external microphone 48.
The transmission unit 10 is designed as a portable unit which may serve several purposes: (a) it may be used in a “conference mode”, in which it is placed stationary on a table; (b) it may be used in a “hand-held mode”, in which it is held in the hand of the user of the ear unit 12; (c) it may be worn around a person's neck, usually a person speaking to the user of the ear unit 12, such as the teacher in a classroom teaching hearing-impaired persons, or a guide in a museum, etc. (“neck mode”); (d) it may be worn at the body of the user of the ear unit 12, with an external microphone 48 and/or an external audio source 46 being connected to the transmission unit 10 (“external audio mode”); the external audio source 46 may be e.g. a TV set or any kind of audio player (e.g. MP3). The transmission unit 10 may in this case also be placed next to the audio equipment.
The audio signals captured by the microphones M1, M2 of the microphone arrangement 42 are supplied as input to the beam former 58, and the output signal provided by the beam former 58 is supplied to the mixing/adding unit 62. In addition, the audio signals of at least one of the microphones M1, M2 are supplied to the classification unit 60; in addition, also the output of the beam former 58 may be supplied to the classification unit 60. The classification unit 60 serves to analyze the audio signals captured by the microphone arrangement 42 in order to determine a present auditory scene category from a plurality of auditory scene categories, i.e. the classification unit 60 serves to determine the present acoustic environment. The output of the classification unit 60 is supplied to the beam former 58, the mixing/adding unit 62 and the audio signal processing unit 64 in order to control the audio signal processing in the central signal processing unit 28 by selecting the presently applied audio signal processing scheme according to the present acoustic environment as determined by the classification unit 60.
Also the audio signals captured by the external microphone 48 may be supplied to the classification unit 60 in order to be taken into account in the auditory scene analysis.
The output of the audio input monitoring unit 66 may be supplied to the classification unit 60, to the mixing/adding unit 62 and to the audio signal processing unit 64 in order to select an audio signal processing scheme according to the presence of an external audio source 46 or according to the type of external microphone 48. For example, the external microphone 48 may be a boom microphone, one or a plurality of omni-directional microphones or a beam-forming microphone. Depending on the type of microphone, the audio input sensitivity and other parameters, such as the choice between an energy-based VAD or a more sophisticated VAD based on direction of arrival in the classification unit 60, may be adjusted automatically.
The audio signals captured by the auxiliary microphone 56 are supplied to the mixing/adding unit 62 in order to be subtracted from the audio signals captured by the microphone arrangement 42, for example, by using a Wiener filter, in order to remove body noise and/or housing noise from the audio signals captured by the microphone arrangement 42.
The audio signals received at the audio input 44, 44′ are supplied to the mixing/adding unit 62.
The output of the mixing/adding unit 62 is supplied to the audio signal processing unit 64.
The distance sensor 50 may comprise an acoustic, usually ultrasonic, and/or an optical, usually infrared, distance sensor in order to measure the distance between the sound source, usually a speaking person towards which the microphone arrangement 42 is directed, and the microphone arrangement 42. To this end, the distance sensor 50 is arranged in such a manner that it aims at the object to which the microphone arrangement 42 is directed. The output of the distance sensor 50 is taken into account in the audio signal processing unit 64 in order to select an audio signal processing scheme according to the measured distance.
The acceleration sensor 52 serves to measure the acceleration acting on the transmission unit 10—and hence on the microphone arrangement 42—in order to estimate in which mode the transmission unit 10 is presently used. For example, if the measured acceleration is very low, it can be concluded that the transmission unit 10 is used in a stationary mode, i.e. in a conference mode.
The orientation sensor 54 preferably is designed for measuring the spatial orientation of the transmission unit, and hence the microphone arrangement 42, so that it can be estimated whether the microphone arrangement 42 oriented essentially vertical or essentially horizontal. Such orientation information can be used for estimating the present use mode of the transmission unit 10. For example, an essentially vertical orientation is typical for a neck-worn/chest-worn mode.
By combining the information provided by the acceleration sensor 52 and the orientation sensor 54 the best estimation of the present use mode is obtained. For example, an essentially horizontal position without significant acceleration is an indicator of a conference/restaurant mode, whereas an essentially horizontal position with acceleration of some extent is an indicator of a hand-held mode. In the hand-held mode, the distance measurement by the distance sensor 50 is most useful, since in the hand-held mode the user may hold the transmission unit 10 in such a manner that the microphone arrangement 52 points to a person speaking to the user. The orientation sensor 54 may comprise a gyroscope, a tilt sensor and/or a roll ball switch.
The output of the sensors 50, 52 and 54 is supplied to the audio signal processing unit 64 in order to select an audio signal processing scheme according to the measured values of the mechanical parameters of the microphone arrangement 42 monitored by the sensors 50, 52 and 54. In particular, as already mentioned above, the information provided by the sensors 50, 52 and 54 can be used to estimate the present use mode of the transmission unit 10 in order to automatically optimize the audio signal processing by selecting the audio signal processing scheme most appropriate for the present use mode.
In the following, examples of such optimization of the audio signal processing are described by reference to
At the bottom in
When the transmission unit 10 is hanging around the neck or is attached to the chest of a person speaking to the user of the ear unit 12 (“neck/chest mode”, which is indicated by an essentially vertical position as measured by the orientation sensor 54), input levels exceeding 75 dB-SPL can typically be expected for the speech signal to be transmitted (this condition is indicated by the working point P1 in
A similar reduction of the overall gain may take place if the audio input monitoring unit 66 detects that a chest microphone or a boom microphone is connected to the transmission unit 10.
When the audio input monitoring unit 66 detects the presence of an external audio signal source 46, which typically is a music player, a “music mode” may be selected in which the dynamic range is increased, for example, by avoiding too strong compression in order to enhance the listening comfort (an example is indicated in
When the transmission unit 10 is in a horizontal position with virtually no movement, which is an indicator for the conference/restaurant mode in which the transmission unit 10 is placed on a table, the beam former 58 should be switched to an omni-directional mode in which there is no beam forming, while the frequency-dependent gain should be optimized for speech understanding. According to
As already mentioned above, an essentially horizontal position of the transmission unit 10 with relative movements of some extent indicates that the transmission unit 10 is carried in the hand of the user of the ear unit 12. In this case, a beamforming algorithm with enhanced gain at lower input levels (as indicated by the arrow in
The information obtained by the distance sensor 50 with regard to the distance of the microphone arrangement 42 to the sound source may be used to set the level-dependent and/or frequency-dependent gain and/or the aperture angle of the beam former 58 according to the measured distance.
While various embodiments in accordance with the present invention have been shown and described, it is understood that the invention is not limited thereto, and is susceptible to numerous changes and modifications as known to those skilled in the art. Therefore, this invention is not limited to the details shown and described herein, and includes all such changes and modifications as encompassed by the scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/008969 | 10/16/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/28/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/049645 | 4/23/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6807445 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
20010053228 | Jones | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020012438 | Leysieffer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020090098 | Allegro et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106094 | Fujino | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040136522 | Wurtz | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040247145 | Luo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060024608 | Toyoda et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060233406 | Fischer | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245608 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285706 | Boor et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070053535 | Frieding | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070140512 | Hain et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070282393 | Marquis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080101635 | Dijkstra et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080192955 | Merks | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2422449 | Mar 2003 | CA |
102005017496 | Aug 2006 | DE |
1083769 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1326478 | Jul 2003 | EP |
0567535 | Aug 2003 | EP |
1377118 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1691574 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1691576 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1698908 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1819195 | Aug 2007 | EP |
9909799 | Nov 1998 | WO |
2007082579 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2009049645 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 20, 2010 issued in PCT/EP2007/008969. |
Search Report for European Application No. 07819037.8, May 16, 2011 (7 p.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100278366 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |