The present invention relates generally to the field of non-volatile memory cells. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method, circuit and system for compensating over time for margin loss in non-volatile memory (“NVM”) cells over an operating temperature range.
NVM cells are generally operated (e.g. programmed, read, and erased) using one or more reference cells and/or structures. In order to determine a condition or state of a memory cell being operated, the cell's operating characteristics may be compared against a reference memory cell or structure usually operated under similar conditions as the cell of interest. As is well known, an NVM cell's state may be defined and determined by its threshold voltage, the voltage at which the cell begins to conduct current. A NVM cell's threshold voltage level is typically correlated to the amount of charge stored in a charge storage region of the cell. Different threshold voltage ranges are associated with different states of an NVM cell.
When programming a NVM cell to a desired state, after each programming pulse, the NVM cell's threshold value may be compared against a reference cell having a reference threshold value set at a voltage level defined as the “program verify” level. The reference cell with a threshold voltage set at a voltage level defined as a “program verify” level for the given state may be compared to the threshold voltage of the cell being programmed (i.e. charged) in order to determine whether a charge storage area or region of the cell being programmed has been sufficiently charged so as to be considered “programmed” at the desired state.
When reading a NVM cell, however, to determine whether it is in a particular state, the cell's threshold voltage may be compared against that of a reference cell having a reference threshold voltage defined as a “read verify” level for the specific state. A “read verify” level for a given state is usually set slightly lower than a “program verify” level for that state in order to compensate for voltage drift which may occur after programming.
In standard NVM cells, program or erase operations on memory cells are usually performed by repetitively applying programming or erasing pulses to the memory cells, followed by one or more program and erase verification steps. In such verification steps, the cells' states are verified to ensure a specific margin against some reference state or level. If the margin is verified then usually no further programming or erasing pulses are applied, and the verified cells are considered to be in a programmed or erased state. The reference state against which the memory cells are measured or compared may be generated by a non-volatile memory reference cell, by a reference voltage or current generator, or by other well known means. The margin is typically measured in terms of Threshold Voltage (VT) difference, voltage or current signals difference, or by other means. Comparing the threshold voltage of a NVM cell to that of a reference cell is often accomplished using a sense amplifier. Various techniques for comparing an NVM's threshold voltage against those of one or more reference cells, in order to determine the NVM's cells state, are well known.
Program or erase margin verification may be required to ensure that the memory cells are reliably readable along the cells' lifetime, i.e. the memory cells' states are correctly and reliably detectable. As visible from
However, as is well known the program and erase margins may detrimentally vary due to any one or several factors, including but not limited to charge leakage from the cell's charge storage region, temperature changes, and due to interference from the operation of neighboring NVM cells. Among the various factors, temperature deviations a cell may experience between the time it is programmed and read may result in deviations up to several hundreds of millivolts in the threshold voltage of a memory cell, which may detrimentally affect these margins. Assuming that the write operation (program or erase operations including the verification steps) was performed at a certain temperature, it is necessary to ensure that the inserted margins are maintained over all the operating temperatures range, otherwise the reliability of the memory cells read may be affected.
Being fabricated substantially under the same manufacturing conditions, NVM cells and reference cells, which typically reside on the same substrate, initially have similar temperature coefficients, resulting in both of them being potentially equally affected by temperature deviations within the operating temperature range. However, reference cells usually undergo one ‘operating cycle’. That is, they are typically programmed only once, to a distinct (reference) state against which the NVM cell may be compared, whereas NVM cells are likely to experience numerous programming and erasing cycles, causing the NVM cells to rapidly age during their lifetime. Different programmed or erased state, as well as different aging of a NVM cell and a reference cell results in their temperature coefficients diverging. In general, the more programming/erasing cycles a NVM cell undergoes, the greater the divergence becomes, until, at some certain point, the margins become detrimentally affected (i.e., reduced).
Taking as an example a non-volatile memory array, in which the NVM cells are verified against a reference cell, then it is known that non-volatile memory cells operated at the same conditions but having different states (i.e. having different VT'S), or having the same state but operated at different conditions (e.g. at a different gate voltage), do not necessarily have the same temperature coefficients of their trans-conductance and/or current characteristics. An example for such a case is shown in
In
In addition to the temperature dependence of the memory cells characteristics, the performance of the peripheral circuits used to readout the cells contents may also vary with temperature. One such example may be the voltages generated on-die and used to bias the read access path or the cells terminals that may vary with temperature. Another example may be the performance of the sense amplifiers used to readout the cells. The sense amplifier gain, offset, or response time may vary with temperature too. As a result, the peripheral circuits performance variations with temperature may further affect the fidelity of the non-volatile memory cells readout. This effect can also be accounted as a “temperature induced margin loss”. As described above, compensating for this margin loss by increasing the operating window (the EM and PM margins) detrimentally affects the cells endurance and retention characteristics.
Non-volatile memory devices usually use larger EM and PM fixed margins to compensate for the temperature induced margin loss. However, when the device is operated at low temperatures then the larger operating window (EM+PM) detrimentally affects the cells endurance and retention characteristics.
Variation of the threshold voltage of memory cells may lead to false readings of their state and may further result in the corruption of the data in the memory array. Voltage drift is especially problematic in Multi-Level Cell (“MLC”) NVM cells where the VT regions or sub-ranges associated with each programmed state are relatively smaller than those for a typical binary cell. The voltage threshold boundaries which define a given state in an MLC cell are usually considerably smaller than those for a binary NVM cell. Because in an MLC cell a fixed range of potential threshold voltages (e.g. 3 Volts to 9 Volts) needs to be split into several sub-ranges or regions, the size of each sub-range or region in an MLC is usually smaller than a region of a binary NVM cell, which binary cell only requires three voltage threshold regions, as seen in
Thus, there is a need for a method to reduce the temperature induced margin loss without the above described detrimental effects.
As part of the present invention, there is provided a method of compensating, over time and over an operating temperature range, for margin loss in a non-volatile memory (“NVM”) cell, which method comprises selection of a reference level based on temperature readings obtained from a temperature sensing element that is thermally coupled, directly or indirectly, to the NVM cell.
In an aspect of the present invention, the reference level may be selected from a group consisting of {Read reference level, Erase reference level, Program reference level}.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the reference level may be obtained by adjusting the output of a single reference based on the temperature reading(s).
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the reference level may be obtained by utilizing pre-stored conversion data, which conversion data associates a given temperature reading to a corresponding temperature range, which is associated with a corresponding reference level.
In an aspect of the present invention, a program verify operation may be performed by applying to the NVM cell's gate a voltage that is higher than the gate voltage of the read reference cell, the difference therebetween is based on the temperature reading(s).
In another aspect of the present invention, an erase verify operation may be performed by applying to the NVM cell's gate a voltage that is lower than the gate voltage of the read reference cell, the difference therebetween is based on the temperature reading(s).
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, a plurality of reference cells may be provided, and the reference level may be selected from a pool of reference cells based on its association to the temperature reading.
In an aspect of the present invention, the pool of reference cells are Program verify reference cells.
In another aspect of the present invention, the pool of reference cells are Erase verify reference cells.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, a margin direct current (“DC”) signal is compared either to the NVM cell's signal or to the reference cell's signal, or both to the NVM cell's signal and to the reference cell's signal, and the margin DC signal is adjusted in accordance with the temperature readings.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the verify reference NVM cell's signal is compared to a DC reference signal. The verify reference signal may be generated internally (i.e., in a reference cell), or externally.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the operating conditions of the NVM cells being read and/or of the peripheral circuits used to read the cells are adjusted in accordance with the temperature readings.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the program and erase verifying reference cells are differently adjusted or selected for program and erase verify operations.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, a reference cell for a program verify operation is selected such that its volt threshold (“VT”) is higher as the temperature of the NVM cell increases.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, a reference cell for an erase verify operation is selected such that its volt threshold (“VT”) is lower as the temperature of the NVM cell decreases.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the program and/or erase margins are adjusted by adding a constant offset signal either to the NVM cell signal or to the reference cell signal, or both to the NVM cell and reference signals, during program or erase verify operations.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the program and erase margins are adjusted by selecting a different reference signal to be used in the program or erase verify operations.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the temperature reading is taken at the initiation of a program or erase operation.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the temperature reading is taken at the initiation of a program verify or erase verify operation.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the temperature reading is taken at least once during a program, erase, or a verify operation.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, temperature readings are taken intermittently or continuously.
As a part of the present invention, a system is also provided for compensating over time for margin loss over an operating temperature in non-volatile memory (“NVM”) cell of interest in a NVM array of cells, which system comprises: a temperature sensing element(s) substantially thermally coupled to the cell or to said NVM array of cells, or to preferred portions thereof; a reference module operative to provide a reference level based on a signal from the temperature sensing element(s), against which the cell of interest is to be compared, which reference level defines program and erase margins; a sensing and readout module for performing the comparisons; an ‘X-Y’ driving and selection module operative to select the cell of interest from the NVM array of cells; a control logic operative to accept temperature readings from the temperature sensing element(s) for controlling the operation of the ‘X-Y’ driving and selection module and the reference module for performing program erase or reading operations on of said NVM cell; wherein the control logic is operative to accept a signal from the sensing and readout module to indicate the completion of the operations; and a power supply block for energizing the other modules.
As a part of the present invention, a circuit is also provided for compensating over time for margin loss in non-volatile memory (“NVM”) cell of interest, over an operating temperature range, which circuit comprises: a temperature sensing element substantially thermally coupled to the NVM cell; and a controller operative to select a reference level based on a signal from the temperature sensor, and to utilize it to perform program, erase or reading operations on the NVM cell, which reference level defining program and erase margins.
As a part of the present invention, the non-volatile memory cell and reference cell are NROM-type non-volatile memory cells.
The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings in which:
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the specification discussions utilizing terms such as “processing”, “computing”, “calculating”, “determining”, or the like, refer to the action and/or processes of a computer or computing system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulate and/or transform data represented as physical, such as electronic, quantities within the computing system's registers and/or memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computing system's memories, registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Embodiments of the present invention may include apparatuses for performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the desired purposes, or it may comprise a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs) electrically programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable and programmable read only memories (EEPROMs), magnetic or optical cards, or any other type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and capable of being coupled to a computer system bus.
The processes and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general purpose systems may be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct a more specialized apparatus to perform the desired method. The desired structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below. In addition, embodiments of the present invention are not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the inventions as described herein.
The temperature of a semiconductor device at any given stage of its operation may be measured using one of several ways that are known in the art. In general, temperatures are measured using an electrical temperature detector that outputs a current, or voltage, signal that is a monotonic function, at least within the operating temperature range involved, of the measured temperature. The output signal of the temperature detector may be either an analog signal, or a digital word that is obtained by converting the analog output signal into a corresponding digital signal by using any standard analog-to-digital (“ADC”) conversion techniques.
For discussion about ‘on-die’ temperature measurements, please refer to: [1] A. Bakker and J. H. Huijsing, “Micropower CMOS temperature sensor with digital output”; IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 31, pp. 933–937, July 1996; [2] M. Tinko, “A two-terminal IC temperature transducer”; IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-11, pp. 784–788, December 1976; or [3] Francisco Serra-Graells, Member, IEEE, and Jose Luis Huertas, Fellow, IEEE, “Sub-1-V CMOS Proportional-to-Absolute Temperature References”; IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, VOL. 38, NO. 1, JANUARY 2003, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference into this application for all purposes.
In accordance with the present invention, the program or erase margins used in the programming or erasing phases of a NVM cell may be adjusted according to the NVM cell's operating temperature. By ‘adjustment of a margin’, or, equivalently, ‘adjustment of a verify reference level’ (sometimes just ‘reference level’) is meant herein increasing, or decreasing, the reference level such that the margin of interest is maintained substantially the same irrespective of any temperature change within the relevant operating temperature range. By ‘margin of interest’ is meant; e.g., erase margin or program margin, each of which may be calculated with respect to; e.g., a read reference level, or erase reference level or program reference level.
As discussed hereinbelow the program and erase margins may be adjusted by a reference level that is either adjusted or selected based on the actual temperature of the NVM cell of interest. By ‘adjusted’ is meant herein changing, or manipulating, the output of a single reference cell to accommodate for temperature changes, whereas by ‘selecting’ is meant herein selection of a reference cell from a pool consisting of a plurality of reference cells of the same type (i.e., a pool of program reference cells, a pool of erase reference cells, etc.).
Advantageously, the actual margin's adjustment will be adapted according to the specific techniques used for measuring the NVM cell's temperature and related margins. For discussion about NVM devices' temperature measurement techniques, please refer to: U.S. Pat. No. 6,128,226 (Eitan, et al., Oct. 3, 2000); U.S. Pat. No. 6,134,156 (Eitan, Oct. 17, 2000) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,535,434 (Maayan, et al., Mar. 18, 2003), the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference into this application for all purposes.
For example, in cases where the (normally current) readout of an array cell is compared to the (normally current) readout of a reference cell, the margin(s) may be adjusted by manipulating the outputs of the cells involved by applying a voltage to the gate of the array cell which is not necessarily the same as the voltage applied to the gate of the reference cell. In such cases, a program verify operation may be applying to the array cell's gate a voltage that is higher by ΔP than the gate voltage of a read reference cell. In the latter case, when the readout from the array cell signal is smaller than that of the read reference cell, it is most likely that a program margin of ΔP is introduced; i.e. the threshold voltage of the array cell is at least higher by ΔP than the read reference cell threshold voltage. A similar scheme may be used for an erase verify operation, but in this case the array cell would be operated at a gate voltage that is lower by ΔP compared to the read reference cell gate voltage.
When a program or erase operation is requested, the operating temperature on-die may be intermittently or continuously measured to allow a corresponding margin to be selected; that is, should the need arises. The program or erase margins relevant to the operation in question (i.e., program or erase operation, respectively) may then be selected based on, or adjusted according to, a pre-determined conversion table such as Table-I.
Referring now to exemplary Table-I, each measured temperature may be associated with one of the temperature ranges (Tj<Temp<Tj+1, j=1, 2, . . . , 5) within some overall operating temperature range (T1÷T5) and, once the respective temperature range is determined, the corresponding program and erase margins maybe be used, which are relevant to the specific measured temperature. Causing the program and erase margins to meet the conditions ΔP1>ΔP2>ΔP3>ΔP4 and ΔE1>ΔE2>ΔE3>ΔE4, respectively, will result in the temperature induced margin loss becoming significantly smaller in respect to using fixed program or erase margins.
Substantially no over-programming or over-erase will occur if the respective margin is adjusted according to the actual temperature at which the program, or erase, operations were performed, because, under such programming/erasing circumstances, the amount of programming or erasing of the cells is minimized. It is noted that despite of the margin(s) adjustments, the readouts from the cells over the whole operating temperature range are reliable.
The adjustment of the program and erase margins as a function of the operating temperature may be performed digitally or in analog manner. In particularly, a logic control circuit (“LCC”), which may reside inside the NVM device, may select the margin to be used based on a pre-stored look-up table similar to Table-I according to the actual temperature of the NVM cell(s) of interest. In some alternative embodiments, a signal representative of the monitored (either as an analog signal or as a digital word) temperature may be directly applied (i.e., without utilizing any conversion table) to affect, or generate, the margin in question.
As described hereinbefore, program and erase margins may be determined as such relative to a Read verify reference cell. However, this is not necessarily so, as the program and erase margins may be determined as such relative to a Program verify reference cell or to an Erase verify reference cell. A Program verify reference cell will normally have a VT that is higher than the Read reference cell VT, while an Erase verify reference cell will normally have a VT that is lower than the Read verify reference cell VT.
No matter what type of verify reference cell is actually utilized (i.e., Read, Program or Erase verify reference cell), the program and erase margins may be adjusted by applying a first voltage to the gate of the NVM cell and a second voltage to the gate of the respective reference cell such that the difference between the first and second voltages would depend on the temperature measured.
Alternatively, instead of changing gates' voltages as described hereinbefore, a specific reference cell may be selected from a pool of verify reference cells based on the temperature of the NVM cell of interest. Accordingly, an appropriate Program verify reference cell, or Erase verify reference cell, may be chosen, based on the monitored temperature, from a pool of Program verify reference cells, or from a pool of Erase verify reference cells.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the program and erase margins may be verified by further comparing a margin DC signal either to the signal output from the NVM cell or the signal output from the reference cell, or both to the signals output from the NVM and reference cells, where the margin DC signal may be adjusted or selected to generate different program or erase margins based on the actual temperature of the NVM cell of interest.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the program and erase margins may be verified by comparing the NVM cell output signal to a DC reference signal that is not necessarily generated by/in the reference cell. In this case, the DC reference signal may be adjusted, or selected, to generate different program or erase margins based on the actual temperature of the NVM cell of interest.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the operating conditions of the NVM cells being read, or of peripheral circuits used to read the cells, may be adjusted based on the operating temperature.
Turning now to
In order to program or erase NVM cell 403, or to read its current state, cell 403 is first selected by control logic unit 406, its selection being made using logic unit 406, which cause ‘X-Y’ matrix 407 to activate, or to ‘switch on’, the appropriate array word line (not shown). Then, logic 406 applies to cell 403 (410) programming, or erasing (whatever the case may be) pulses, which are followed by program (or erase) verification steps that are carried out by comparing, in Sensing and Readout module 405, the output signal of cell 403 to a reference level (402) that is adjusted or selected by control logic 406. The program or erase pulses are applied to the NVM cell of interest (e.g., cell 403), and the comparison phase is in force (405) until sensing and readout module 405 sends an indication (411) to logic module 406, which allows logic module 406 to determine that the NVM cell of interest has reached the intended state (i.e., if programming or erasing operations were made), or to read the current state of the NVM cell (i.e., if only the current status of the cell was to be read).
Reference 402 may be a single reference cell whose output signal, which is used for comparison purposes (i.e., in Sensing and Readout module 405), is adjusted by control logic 406, such as by applying different voltages to the gates of cell 403 and the reference cell. The difference between the two gate voltages is determined by the control logic 406 and will depend on the actual temperature of cell 403 as sensed by temperature sensor 401. Reference block 402 may include several different types of ‘single’ reference cell; i.e., one Program verify reference cell, one Erase verify reference cell, etc., each type of reference cell being dedicated for specific operation made with respect to cell 403 (i.e., ‘verifying program’, ‘verifying erase’, etc.).
Alternatively, reference 402 may include a pool of reference cells of the same type from which control logic 406 would select an appropriate reference cell according to the actual temperature of cell 403 as sensed by temperature sensor 401. For example, reference block 402 may include a pool of program verify reference cells, a pool of erase verify reference cells or a pool of read verify reference cells.
In general, temperature sensor 401 senses the temperature of NVM cell 403 by being thermally coupled to NVM cell 403. Sensor 401 may sense the temperature of cell 403 either directly or indirectly. In the first case (i.e., direct temperature sensing), sensor 401 may be in direct physical contact with cell 403, whereas in the second case (i.e., indirect temperature sensing) the temperature of cell 403 may be sensed via some intermediating media. After obtaining the temperature reading; e.g., of cell 403, a single reference cell is adjusted, or an appropriate reference cell is selected from several reference cells, by control logic 406 as described hereinbefore.
Control logic 406 may include a memory array 409 for storing therein associations between temperatures, or temperature ranges, to corresponding reference cells. Given a specific temperature measurement, control logic 406 would utilize memory array 409 to first determine the relevant temperature range and, then, to associate the relevant temperature range to an appropriate reference level that should be used in conjunction with the NVM cell of interest (e.g., cell 403). As described hereinbefore, the reference level may be introduced (402) by adjusting the output of a single reference cell, or it can be introduced by selecting one reference cell from a pool of likewise reference cells.
While certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes, and equivalents will now occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3881180 | Gosney, Jr. | Apr 1975 | A |
3895360 | Cricchi et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
4342102 | Puar | Jul 1982 | A |
4388705 | Sheppard | Jun 1983 | A |
4527257 | Cricchi | Jul 1985 | A |
4667217 | Janning | May 1987 | A |
4725984 | Ip et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4733105 | Shin et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4742491 | Liang et al. | May 1988 | A |
4857770 | Partovi et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4916671 | Ichiguchi | Apr 1990 | A |
4961010 | Davis | Oct 1990 | A |
5027321 | Park | Jun 1991 | A |
5029063 | Lingstaedt et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5042009 | Kazerounian et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5081371 | Wong | Jan 1992 | A |
5142496 | Van Buskirk | Aug 1992 | A |
5237213 | Tanoi | Aug 1993 | A |
5241497 | Komarek | Aug 1993 | A |
5276646 | Kim et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280420 | Rapp | Jan 1994 | A |
5289412 | Frary et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5293563 | Ohta | Mar 1994 | A |
5295108 | Higa | Mar 1994 | A |
5305262 | Yoneda | Apr 1994 | A |
5345425 | Shikatani | Sep 1994 | A |
5349221 | Shimoji | Sep 1994 | A |
5359554 | Odake et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5400286 | Chu et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5418743 | Tomioka et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422844 | Wolstenholme et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5424978 | Wada et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5434825 | Harari | Jul 1995 | A |
5440505 | Fazio et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450341 | Sawada et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450354 | Sawada et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5477499 | Van Buskirk et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5521870 | Ishikawa | May 1996 | A |
5523972 | Rashid et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534804 | Woo | Jul 1996 | A |
5537358 | Fong | Jul 1996 | A |
5553030 | Tedrow et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557221 | Taguchi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557570 | Iwahashi | Sep 1996 | A |
5559687 | Nicollini et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563823 | Yiu et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568085 | Eitan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579199 | Kawamura et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581252 | Thomas | Dec 1996 | A |
5583808 | Brahmbhatt | Dec 1996 | A |
5590074 | Akaogi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596527 | Tomioka et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5608679 | Mi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612642 | McClinyock | Mar 1997 | A |
5623438 | Guritz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5633603 | Lee | May 1997 | A |
5636288 | Bonneville et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657332 | Auclair et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663907 | Frayer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672959 | Der | Sep 1997 | A |
5675280 | Nomura | Oct 1997 | A |
5677869 | Fazio et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689459 | Chang et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694356 | Wong et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708608 | Park et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712815 | Bill et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715193 | Norman | Feb 1998 | A |
5717581 | Canclini | Feb 1998 | A |
5717632 | Richart et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717635 | Akatsu | Feb 1998 | A |
5726946 | Yamagata et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748534 | Dunlap et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751637 | Chen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754475 | Bill et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760634 | Fu | Jun 1998 | A |
5768193 | Lee et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774395 | Richart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781476 | Seki et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784314 | Sali et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787036 | Okazawa | Jul 1998 | A |
5805500 | Campardo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808506 | Tran | Sep 1998 | A |
5812449 | Song | Sep 1998 | A |
5812456 | Hull et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812457 | Arase | Sep 1998 | A |
5815435 | Van Tran | Sep 1998 | A |
5828601 | Hollmer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841700 | Chang | Nov 1998 | A |
5847441 | Cutter et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861771 | Matsuda et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867429 | Chen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870334 | Hemink et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870335 | Khan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880620 | Gitlin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886927 | Takeuchi | Mar 1999 | A |
RE36179 | Shimoda | Apr 1999 | E |
5892710 | Fazio et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903031 | Yamada et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910924 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926409 | Engh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933367 | Matsuo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936888 | Sugawara | Aug 1999 | A |
5946258 | Evertt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949714 | Hemink et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949728 | Liu et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963412 | En | Oct 1999 | A |
5969993 | Takeshima | Oct 1999 | A |
5982666 | Campardo | Nov 1999 | A |
5991202 | Derhacobian et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999444 | Fujiwara et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005423 | Schultz | Dec 1999 | A |
6011725 | Eitan | Jan 2000 | A |
6028324 | Su et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034896 | Ranaweera et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040610 | Noguchi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044019 | Cernea et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044022 | Nachumovsky | Mar 2000 | A |
6064251 | Park | May 2000 | A |
6064591 | Takeuchi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074916 | Cappelletti | Jun 2000 | A |
6075402 | Ghilardelli | Jun 2000 | A |
6075724 | Li et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078518 | Chevallier | Jun 2000 | A |
6081456 | Dadashev | Jun 2000 | A |
6084794 | Lu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091640 | Kawahara et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094095 | Murray et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097639 | Choi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107862 | Mukainakano et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108240 | Lavi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108241 | Chevallier | Aug 2000 | A |
6118207 | Ormerod et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118692 | Banks | Sep 2000 | A |
6128226 | Eitan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130572 | Ghilardelli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130574 | Bloch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134156 | Eitan | Oct 2000 | A |
6147904 | Liron | Nov 2000 | A |
6150800 | Kinoshita et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154081 | Pakkala et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157242 | Fukui | Dec 2000 | A |
6157570 | Nachumovsky | Dec 2000 | A |
6169691 | Pasotti et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181605 | Hollmer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185143 | Perner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188211 | Rincon-Mora et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192445 | Rezvani | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198342 | Kawai | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201737 | Hollmer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205056 | Pan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208200 | Arakawa | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214666 | Mehta | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215148 | Eitan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215697 | Lu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215702 | Derhacobian et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219277 | Devin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222762 | Guterman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233180 | Eitan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240032 | Fukumoto | May 2001 | B1 |
6240040 | Akaogi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246555 | Tham | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252799 | Liu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256231 | Lavi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266281 | Derhacobian et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282133 | Nakagawa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285246 | Basu | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285614 | Mulatti et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292394 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297974 | Ganesan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304485 | Harari et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307784 | Hamilton et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307807 | Sakui et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320786 | Chang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324094 | Chevallier | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326265 | Liu et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330192 | Ohba et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331950 | Kuo et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343033 | Parker | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351415 | Kushnarenko | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353356 | Liu | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6353554 | Banks | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6353555 | Jeong | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359501 | Lin et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6385086 | Mihara et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396741 | Bloom et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400209 | Matsuyama et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407537 | Antheunis | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6426898 | Mihnea et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433624 | Grossnikle et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438031 | Fastow | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442074 | Hamilton et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445030 | Wu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449190 | Bill | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452438 | Li | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456528 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456533 | Hamilton et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469929 | Kushnarenko et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469935 | Hayashi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6477085 | Kuo | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490204 | Bloom et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496414 | Kasa et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6510082 | Le et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512701 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519180 | Tran et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6519182 | Derhacobian et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522585 | Pasternak | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535020 | Yin | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535434 | Maayan et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6552387 | Eitan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567303 | Hamilton et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567312 | Torii et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574139 | Kurihara | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577514 | Shor et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577532 | Chevallier | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577547 | Ukon | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584017 | Maayan et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6590811 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594181 | Yamada | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608526 | Sauer | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614295 | Tsuchi | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6618290 | Wang et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624672 | Confaloneri et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627555 | Eitan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636440 | Maayan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639837 | Takano et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639844 | Liu et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639849 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643177 | Le et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6643178 | Kurihara | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6643181 | Sofer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650568 | Iijima | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654296 | Jang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665769 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677805 | Shor et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690602 | Le et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700818 | Shappir et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723518 | Papsidero et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6768165 | Eitan | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6788579 | Gregori et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791396 | Shor et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6831872 | Matsuoka | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836431 | Chang | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6885585 | Maayan et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6917544 | Maayan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928001 | Avni et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20020004878 | Norman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020132436 | Ellyahu et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020145465 | Shor et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020191465 | Maayan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030021155 | Yachareni et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030072192 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076710 | Sofer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030117841 | Yamashita | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131186 | Buhr | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142544 | Maayan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030202411 | Yamada | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206435 | Takahashi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208663 | Van Buskirk et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214844 | Iijima | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218913 | Le et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227796 | Miki et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012993 | Kurihara | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013000 | Torii | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027858 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040151034 | Shor et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153621 | Polansky et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0693781 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 843 398 | May 1998 | EP |
1126468 | Aug 2001 | EP |
0740307 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1164597 | Dec 2001 | EP |
001217744 | Mar 2004 | EP |
63-249375 | Oct 1988 | JP |
3-285358 | Dec 1991 | JP |
408106791 | Apr 1996 | JP |
408297988 | Nov 1996 | JP |
10-106276 | Apr 1998 | JP |
02001118392 | Apr 2001 | JP |
02002216488 | Aug 2002 | JP |
WO 0046808 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0165566 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0165567 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0243073 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03036651 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03063167 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03063168 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03079370 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03088258 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03088259 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03088260 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03088261 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060285408 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |