The described subject matter relates generally to gas turbine engines and, more particularly, to an improved method for centering concentric cases or housings.
Assembly stack up may affect the concentricity of engine structures, such as the concentricity of the bearing housings with respect to the outer case of the gas turbine engine assembly, which could bring the turbine rotors off-center relative to stationary components such as turbine shrouds, thereby directly affecting the blade tip and secondary air seal clearance, among other things.
Accordingly, there is a need to provide an improved method for centering turbine engine cases.
In one aspect, there is provided a method for positioning outer and inner cases of a gas turbine engine relative to one another, the outer and inner cases having a plurality of radial spokes extending between them when the outer and inner cases are assembled, a bearing housing being attached to the inner case, the method comprising: (1) determining a variance between a present spoke length and a desired spoke length for each spoke based on a desired positioning of the cases; wherein eccentricity is measured between the outer case and the bearing housing on a fixture assembly; (2) modifying an effective length of each spoke according to the variance to meet the desired spoke length; and then (3) assembling the cases with the spokes to provide the desired positioning of the cases.
In another aspect, there is provided a method for centering a bearing housing during a mid turbine frame assembly procedure, the mid turbine frame to be assembled including at least an inner case co-axially supported in an outer case by a plurality of radial spokes, and the bearing housing attached to the inner case, each of the spokes having an inner end abutting and connected to one of axial surfaces of the inner case, the method comprising: a) selecting one of the inner end of each spoke and each said axial surface to be machined for concentric adjustment of the bearing housing within the outer case before the respective spokes are connected to the inner case; b) measuring a radial distance D1 between the respective axial surfaces of the inner case and an inner diameter surface of the bearing housing when the respective inner ends of the spokes are selected to be machined; c) measuring a radial distance D2 between respective inner ends of the spokes and an inner diameter surface of the outer case when the respective axial surfaces are selected to be machined; d) machining the inner end of the individual spokes to suit the respective measurements taken in step (b), thereby obtaining a predetermined radial distance D between the inner diameter surface of the outer case and the inner diameter surface of the bearing housing when the mid turbine frame is assembled; or e) machining the respective axial surfaces of the inner case to suit the respective measurements taken in step (c), thereby obtaining a predetermined radial distance D between the inner diameter surface of the outer case and the inner diameter surface of the bearing housing when the mid turbine frame is assembled; and f) connecting the inner ends of the spokes to the axial surfaces of the inner case, respectively after step (d) or (e).
Reference is now made to the accompanying drawings depicting aspects of the described subject matter, in which:
Referring to
Referring to
The MTF portion 28 may be further provided with inter-turbine duct structure 110 for directing combustion gases to flow through the MTF portion 28. The inner-turbine duct (ITD) structure 110 includes, for example, an annular duct 112 has an annular outer duct wall 114 and an annular inner duct wall 116. An annular path 136 is defined between the outer and inner duct walls 114, 116 to direct the combustion gas flow.
The annular duct 112 further includes a plurality of radially-extending hollow struts 118 (at least three struts) connected to the respective outer and inner duct walls. A plurality of openings 120, 122 are defined in the respective outer and inner duct walls 114, 116 and aligned with the respective hollow struts 118 to allow the respective load transfer spokes 36 to radially extend through the hollow struts 118.
The ITD structure 110 may include a retaining apparatus such as an expansion joint 138 (see
The load transfer spokes 36 are each connected at an inner end (not numbered) thereof, to the axial wall 38 of the inner case. For example, a flat end plate 52 which are substantially perpendicular to the spoke 36 and is connected to an axial surface of a connecting pad 35, which are substantially perpendicular to the spoke 36 connected thereto. The spokes 36 are each connected at an outer end (not numbered) thereof, to the outer case 30 by a plurality of fasteners 42. The fasteners 42 extend radially through openings 46 (see
The outer case 30 includes for example, a plurality of support bases 39, each being defined as a flat base substantially normal to a central axis (not shown) of the respective load transfer spokes 36. The support bases 39 are formed by a plurality of respective recesses 40 defined in the outer case 30. The recesses 40 are circumferentially spaced apart one from another corresponding to the annular position of the respective load transfer spokes 36. The outer case 30 in this embodiment has truncated conical configuration in which a diameter of a radial end of the outer case 30 is larger than a diameter of a front end of the outer case 30. Therefore, a depth of the support bases 39/recesses 40 varies, decreasing from the front end to the rear end of the outer case 30. An inner diameter surface 49 is circumferentially and axially defined in the front end of the outer case 30, which is concentric about the axis of the annular outer case 30. The inner case 34 is supported within the outer case by the plurality of the radial spokes 36. Due to tolerance stack up, the bearing housing 50 may not be concentrically positioned within the outer case 30 enough to meet engine assembly requirements.
It is noted that the concentricity of the outer and inner cases 30, 34 is affected by variance of the present spoke length and a desirable spoke length. Therefore, it is possible to modify an effective spoke length to meet the desired spoke length. The present spoke length is the actual length of the spoke 36. The effective spoke length is an actual radial distance effected by a spoke when the spoke is connected between the outer and inner cases 30, 34. The effective spoke length may be affected not only by the actual length of the spoke 36, but also other by factors such as spacers between the spoke and the connected cases or the position of mating surfaces of the cases which the spoke end abuts.
Referring to
The inner case 34 is then placed within the above described sub-assembly and positioned concentric with respect to the outer case 30. The concentricity of the inner case 34 relative to the outer case 30 is assured by means of a fixture which is schematically shown by broken lines 130 which includes concentric annular positioning surfaces (not numbered) abutting the respective inner diameter surfaces 37, 49 of the inner and outer cases 34, 30, thereby holding the sub-assembly and the inner case 34 in a concentric position.
Due to the manufacturing accuracy and tolerance stack-up, a radial gap G1 (see
As referring to
Alternatively, the bearing housing may be attached to the inner case 34 to form a second sub-assembly of the MTF portion 28 before the inner case 34 is connected to the respective spokes 36. In this alternative embodiment, the fixture 130 is replaced by a similar fixture (not shown) which contacts inner diameter surface 49 of the outer case 30 but does not contact the inner diameter surface 37 of the inner case 34 as shown in
Referring to
According to this embodiment, the selected spacers 47 are not used to fill-up radial gaps between the inner end of the respective spokes and the inner case 34, but are used to close the radial gaps between the outer end of the respective spokes 36 and the outer case 30 when the respective spokes 36 are in direct contact with the inner case 34. In practice, a sub-assembly of the outer case 30, and spokes 36, optionally with ITD structure 110 is provided similarly with that in
After the respective spacers 47 are selected for the individual gaps G2, the inner case 34 may be removed from the fixture 130 to allow the respective spokes 36 to be moved away to allow the selected spacer 47 to be placed in position such that the spoke 36 can be moved back in position to be secured to the outer case 30 with the spacer sandwiched therebetween. At this stage, the inner case 34 may be moved back in position and the inner end plates 52 of the respective spokes 36 are secured to the respective connecting pads 35 of the inner case 34.
Similar to the embodiment shown in
It is also noted that an opening (not shown) may be required in the bases 39/recesses 40 for measuring the radial gaps G2.
Referring to
During the assembly procedure of the mid turbine frame portion 28, there provided are sub-assembly 28′ including the outer case 30 and the radial spokes 36 attached thereto, and a sub-assembly 28″ including the inner case 34 and bearing housing 50 concentrically attached thereto.
A radial distance D1 is defined between the respective axial surfaces of the connecting pads 35 of the inner case 34 and an inner diameter surface selected from one of the inner diameter surfaces 53, 55 (
Each of the inner ends, such as the inner end plate 52 of the respective spokes 36 is machined to suit the respective measurements of D1 relating to the corresponding axial surface of the connecting pads 35 which is to be connected with the particular spoke 36, thereby obtaining a predetermined radial distance D which is defined between the inner diameter surface 49 of the outer case 30 and the inner diameter surface 53 in accordance with the engine design.
Alternatively, a radial distance D2 is defined between the respective inner end, such as the inner end plate 52 in this case of the spokes and the inner diameter surface 49 of the outer case in the sub-assembly 28′. Due to the accuracy limit of the machining process of the spokes 36 and the assembly stack-up of the sub-assembly 28′, different measurements of D2 may be taken relating to different spokes 36. The respective axial surfaces of connecting pads 35 of the inner case 34, may be selected to be machined to suit the respective measurements of D2, thereby obtaining the predetermined radial distance D as shown in
After machining either the respective spokes 36 or the axial surfaces of connecting pads 35 of the inner case 34, the inner ends of the spokes 36 are connected to the axial surfaces of connecting pads 35 of the inner case 34, respectively, to assemble the sub-assemblies 28′and 28″ together to form the MTF portion 28.
The ITD such as shown in
Optionally, the predetermined radial distance D is achieved as follows. The various measurements of D1 and D2 relating to the respective axial surfaces of the connecting pads 35 of the inner case 34 and the respective spokes 36 obtained in the respective sub-assemblies 28″ and 28′ are recorded. Paring the respective measurements of D1 and D2 according to the connection of the respective spokes 36 and the axial surfaces of the connecting pads 35 of the inner case 34 to calculate a material thickness Δ to be removed from either the spokes 36 or the axial surfaces of the connecting pads 35 of the inner case 34, respectively. The material thickness Δ calculated from the respective measurements of D1 and D2 in each link, is suit for the following equations: (D1−Δ)+D2=D or (D2−Δ)+D1=D. It is understood that the sum of the radial distances D1 and D2 measured in any radial distance in which the spokes 36 extend, is greater than or at least equal to the predetermined radial distance D in order to provide the possibility for centering the bearing housing 50 by the described machining process.
Referring to
Similarly, it is understood that the ITD as illustrated in
In view of the above description, it will also be understood that these approaches may be used to establish and maintain any desired relative positioning of the inner and outer structures. For example, if a desired eccentricity (as opposed to concentricity) is desired, say to account for differential thermal growth in the structure at operating temperatures or to account for an corresponding eccentricity in rotor behaviour, then the above-described approaches may also be suitable in providing the desired relative positioning.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departure from the scope of the invention disclosed. For example, the approach may be applied to the centering of a bearing housing or other engine structure in any suitable engine case arrangement, and may be employed with any suitable bearing housing or other engine structure configuration. The approach may be applied to any suitable gas turbine engine configuration. Any suitable spoke and/or spacer configuration may be employed. Still other modifications which fall within the spirit of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of the review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/571,952 filed on Oct. 1, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1009786 | Pfeifer | Nov 1911 | A |
2016435 | Isidin | Jan 1931 | A |
1943142 | Peters | Jul 1932 | A |
2621850 | Firth | Dec 1952 | A |
2724621 | Kenney, Jr. | Nov 1955 | A |
2860015 | Matterson | Nov 1958 | A |
2941781 | Boyum | Jun 1960 | A |
3261587 | Rowley | Jul 1966 | A |
3398306 | Merrick et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3398535 | Campbell et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3421686 | Coplin et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3620641 | Keen et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3684332 | Benson et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3718378 | Clay | Feb 1973 | A |
4035044 | Miyazaki | Jul 1977 | A |
4093321 | Ikariishi et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4139244 | Guerguerian | Feb 1979 | A |
4184089 | Sterrett et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4222708 | Davison | Sep 1980 | A |
4276974 | Ladin | Jul 1981 | A |
4330234 | Colley | May 1982 | A |
4470187 | Klievoneit et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4501095 | Drinkuth et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4512115 | Miller | Apr 1985 | A |
4548546 | Lardellier | Oct 1985 | A |
4575911 | Laszlo | Mar 1986 | A |
4987736 | Ciokajlo et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5001830 | Partington et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5160251 | Ciokajlo | Nov 1992 | A |
5201586 | Zimmermann et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5326222 | Matyscak et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5625446 | Bedard | Apr 1997 | A |
5642011 | Fanning et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5749659 | Nisley | May 1998 | A |
5906523 | Thomson | May 1999 | A |
6309177 | Swiderski et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6354780 | Davis et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358001 | Bosel et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6942390 | Fuerst et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6956367 | Fujikawa et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7069654 | Robbins | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7260892 | Schilling et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273348 | Amirtharajah et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7501811 | Ono | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510374 | Meacham | Mar 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130061473 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12571952 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 13655860 | US |