This invention relates generally to electrical switchgear and more particularly, to a method and apparatus for facilitating optimizing communications between power distribution system components.
In an industrial power distribution system, power generated by a power generation company may be supplied to an industrial or commercial facility wherein the power may be distributed throughout the industrial or commercial facility to various equipment such as, for example, motors, welding machinery, computers, heaters, lighting, and other electrical equipment. At least some known power distribution systems include switchgear which facilitates dividing the power into branch circuits which supply power to various portions of the industrial facility. Circuit breakers are provided in each branch circuit to facilitate protecting equipment within the branch circuit. Additionally, circuit breakers in each branch circuit can facilitate minimizing equipment failures since specific loads may be energized or de-energized without affecting other loads, thus creating increased efficiencies, and reduced operating and manufacturing costs. Similar switchgear may also be used within an electric utility transmission system and a plurality of distribution substations, although the switching operations used may be more complex.
Switchgear typically include multiple devices, other than the power distribution system components, to facilitate providing protection, monitoring, and control of the power distribution system components. For example, at least some known breakers include a plurality of shunt trip circuits, under-voltage relays, trip units, and a plurality of auxiliary switches that close the breaker in the event of an undesired interruption or fluctuation in the power supplied to the power distribution components. Additionally, at least one known power distribution system also includes a monitor device that monitors a performance of the power distribution system, a control device that controls an operation of the power distribution system, and a protection device that initiates a protective response when the protection device is activated.
In at least some other known power distribution systems, a monitor and control system operates independently of the protective system. For example, a protective device may de-energize a portion of the power distribution system based on its own predetermined operating limits, without the monitoring devices recording the event. The failure of the monitoring system to record the system shutdown may mislead an operator to believe that an over-current condition has not occurred within the power distribution system, and as such, a proper corrective action may not be initiated by the operator. Additionally, a protective device, i.e. a circuit breaker, may open because of an over-current condition in the power distribution system, but the control system may interpret the over-current condition as a loss of power from the power source, rather than a fault condition. As such, the control logic may undesirably attempt to connect the faulted circuit to an alternate source, thereby restoring the over-current condition. In addition to the potential increase in operational defects which may occur using such devices, the use of multiple devices and interconnecting wiring associated with the devices may cause an increase in equipment size, an increase in the complexity of wiring the devices, and/or an increase in a quantity of devices installed.
Centrally controlling of power distribution systems may overcome the above mentioned shortcomings of known power distribution systems. Central control systems may also present new problems which may need solutions before central control systems become a viable new control system. For example, communications between the central controller and controlled devices may occur over long distances, redundancy requirements may make communications slow due to additional devices communicating in parallel, and separate communication channels may need to be cross-checked for accuracy.
Central control systems may receive electrical inputs from the controlled process through remote input/output (I/O) modules communicating with the central control system over a high-speed communication network. Outputs generated by the industrial controller are likewise transmitted over the network to the I/O circuits to be communicated to the controlled equipment. The network provides a simplified means of communicating signals over an industrial environment without multiple point-to-point wires and the attendant cost of installation.
The central control system may use real time control to achieve latency goals. Effective real-time control is provided by executing the control program repeatedly in high speed “scan” cycles. During each scan cycle each remote node samples inputs at a selectable frequency and output messages are computed. The output messages are transmitted to the central control location where these data samples are processed to provide a control of the system such as centralized control. A relatively large number of samples are taken at the remote node, such as, for example 128 samples per second, and are packaged to share space in a message. Together with the high-speed communications network, this ensures the response of the central control system to changes in the inputs and its generation of outputs will be rapid. All information is dealt with centrally by a well-characterized processor and communicated over a high-speed communication network to yield predictable delay times, and low latency, which is critical to deterministic control. The high data transmission rate and large number of remote nodes attempting to communicate creates network traffic congestion that may adversely affect power distribution system latency and the ability of the power distribution system to operate efficiently.
A method for communicating information bundled in digital message packets via a digital network communication system is provided. The digital network communication system a sample source and each packet includes a header and a communication payload area. The method includes sampling the source at a first sample rate, selecting at least one decimation of the samples based on at least one of a plurality of algorithmic data rates and a channel bandwidth, determining a packet rate based on a plurality of algorithmic latency requirements, and transmitting the digital message packet containing decimated data on the digital network.
In use, power is supplied to a main feed system 12, i.e. a switchboard for example, from a source (not shown) such as, but not limited to, a steam turbine, powered from, for example, a nuclear reactor or a coal fired boiler, a gas turbine generator, and a diesel generator. Power supplied to main feed system 12 is divided into a plurality of branch circuits using circuit breakers 16 which supply power to various loads 18 in the industrial facility. In addition, circuit breakers 16 are provided in each branch circuit to facilitate protecting equipment, i.e. loads 18, connected within the respective branch circuit. Additionally, circuit breakers 16 facilitate minimizing equipment failures since specific loads 18 may be energized or de-energized without affecting other loads 18, thus creating increased efficiencies, and reduced operating and manufacturing costs.
Power distribution system 10 includes a circuit breaker control protection system 19 that includes a plurality of node electronics units 20 that are each electrically coupled to a digital network 22. Circuit breaker control protection system 19 also includes at least one central control processing unit (CCPU) 24 that is electrically coupled to digital network 22 via a switch 23 such as, but not limited to, an Ethernet switch 23. In use, each respective node electronics unit 20 is electrically coupled to a respective circuit breaker 16, such that CCPU 24 is electrically coupled to each circuit breaker 16 through digital network 22 and through an associated node electronics unit 20.
In the exemplary embodiment, digital network 22 is a Fast Ethernet protocol network. In another embodiment, digital network 22 includes, for example, at least one of a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), dial-in-connections, cable modems, and special high-speed ISDN lines. Digital network 22 also includes any device capable of interconnecting to the Internet including a web-based phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), or other web-based connectable equipment. It should be appreciated that the digital network 22 network is upgradeable based on future revisions to IEEE 802.3(u) and its successors. It should further be appreciated that the digital network 22 is configurable, for example, in a star topology.
In one embodiment, CCPU 24 is a computer and includes a device 26, for example, a floppy disk drive or CD-ROM drive, to facilitate reading instructions and/or data from a computer-readable medium 28, such as a floppy disk or CD-ROM. In another embodiment, CCPU 24 executes instructions stored in firmware (not shown). CCPU 24 is programmed to perform functions described herein, but other programmable circuits can likewise be programmed. Accordingly, as used herein, the term computer is not limited to just those integrated circuits referred to in the art as computers, but broadly refers to computers, processors, microcontrollers, microcomputers, programmable logic controllers, application specific integrated circuits, and other programmable circuits. Additionally, although described in a power distribution setting, it is contemplated that the benefits of the invention accrue to all electrical distribution systems including industrial systems such as, for example, but not limited to, an electrical distribution system installed in an office building.
Additionally, in an exemplary embodiment, internal bus 50 includes an address bus, a data bus, and a control bus. In use, the address bus is configured to enable CPU 48 to address a plurality of internal memory locations or an input/output port, such as, but not limited to communications interface 52 through communications processor 54, and a gateway interface 57, through a gateway processor 58. The data bus is configured to transmit instructions and/or data between CPU 48 and at least one input/output, and the control bus is configured to transmit signals between the plurality of devices to facilitate ensuring that the devices are operating in synchronization. In the exemplary embodiment, internal bus 50 is a bi-directional bus such that signals can be transmitted in either direction on internal bus 50. CCPU 24 also includes at least one storage device 60 configured to store a plurality of information transmitted via internal bus 50.
In use, gateway interface 57 communicates to a remote workstation (not shown) via an Internet link 62 or an Intranet 62. In the exemplary embodiment, the remote workstation is a personal computer including a web browser. Although a single workstation is described, such functions as described herein can be performed at one of many personal computers coupled to gateway interface 57. For example, gateway interface 57 may be communicatively coupled to various individuals, including local operators and to third parties, e.g., remote system operators via an ISP Internet connection. The communication in the example embodiment is illustrated as being performed via the Internet, however, any other wide area network (WAN) type communication can be utilized in other embodiments, i.e., the systems and processes are not limited to being practiced via the Internet. In one embodiment, information is received at gateway interface 57 and transmitted to node electronics unit 20 via CCPU 24 and digital network 22. In another embodiment, information sent from node electronics unit 20 is received at communication interface 52 and transmitted to Internet 62 via gateway interface 57.
In one embodiment, node electronics unit 20 receives signals input from a plurality of devices, such as, but not limited to, a current sensor 82, a voltage sensor 84, and/or circuit breaker 16. Status signals from circuit breaker 16 can include signals related to one or more conditions of the breaker, such as, but not limited to, an auxiliary switch status, and a spring charge switch status. Additionally, node electronics unit 20 sends signals to at least circuit breaker 16 in order to control one or more states of the breaker.
In use, signals are transmitted to CCPU 24 via node electronics unit 20, and digital network 22. Node electronics unit 20 receives the signals and packages a digital message that includes the signals and additional data relating to a health and status of node electronics unit 20. The health and status data may include information based on problems found by internal diagnostic routines and a status of self checking routines that run locally in node electronics unit 20. CCPU 24 processes digital message using one or more protection algorithms, monitoring algorithms, and any combination thereof. In response to the processing of digital message, CCPU 24 sends digital message back to node electronics unit 20 via digital network 22. In the exemplary embodiment, node electronics unit 20 actuates circuit breaker 16 via signal in response to digital message received from CCPU 24. In one embodiment, circuit breaker 16 is actuated in response to commands sent only by CCPU 24, i.e., circuit breaker 16 is not controlled locally by node electronics unit 20, but rather is operated remotely from CCPU 24 based on digital message received from node electronics unit 20 over network 22.
Circuit breaker 16 is in electrical communication with node electronics unit 20 through a wiring harness, which may include copper wiring, communications conduits, and any combination thereof. Current sensor 82, and voltage sensor 84 are in electrical communication with node electronics unit 20 through a cable that may include copper wiring, communications conduits, and any combination thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, circuit breaker 16 is a unitary device mounted proximate to node electronics unit 20, current sensor 82, and voltage sensor 84.
In use, actuation signals from node electronics unit 20 are transmitted to circuit breaker 16 to actuate a plurality of functions in circuit breaker 16, such as, but not limited to, operating a trip coil 100, operating a close coil 102, and affecting a circuit breaker lockout feature. An auxiliary switch 104 and operating spring charge switch 106 provide a status indication of circuit breaker parameters to node electronics unit 20. Motor 108 is configured to recharge an operating spring, configured as a close spring (not shown) after circuit breaker 16 closes. It should be appreciated that the motor 108 can include, for example, a spring charge switch, a solenoid or any other electromechanical device capable of recharging a trip spring. To close circuit breaker 16, a close coil 102 is energized by a close signal from actuation power module (not shown). Close coil 102 actuates a closing mechanism (not shown) that couples at least one movable electrical contact (not shown) to a corresponding fixed electrical contact (not shown). The closing mechanism of circuit breaker 16 latches in a closed position such that when close coil 102 is de-energized, circuit breaker 16 remains closed. When breaker 16 closes, an “a” contact of auxiliary switch 104 also closes and a “b” contact of auxiliary switch 104 opens. The position of the “a” and “b” contacts is sensed by node electronics unit 20. To open circuit breaker 16, node electronics unit 20 energizes trip coil (TC) 100. TC 100 acts directly on circuit breaker 16 to release the latching mechanism that holds circuit breaker 16 closed. When the latching mechanism is released, circuit breaker 16 will open, opening the “a” contact and closing the “b” contact of auxiliary switch 104. Trip coil 100 is then de-energized by node electronics unit 20. After breaker 16 opens, with the close spring recharged by motor 108, circuit breaker 16 is prepared for a next operating cycle. In the exemplary embodiment, each node electronics unit 20 is coupled to circuit breaker 16 in a one-to-one correspondence. For example, each node electronics unit 20 communicates directly with only one circuit breaker 16. In an alternative embodiment, node electronics unit 20 may communicate with a plurality of circuit breakers 16.
Communication payload area 602 includes a plurality of data areas that include algorithmic data, which may be data requested by a sampling node, such as node electronics unit 20. Algorithmic data includes, for example, power distribution system basic protection data, power distribution system metering data, power distribution system waveform capture data and power distribution system harmonic analysis data. Each of such data types contained in these data areas may each be sampled at different data acquisition rates. In the exemplary embodiment, a first data area 610 includes basic protection sample data received from current sensor 82, voltage sensor 84, and status input device 86. Basic protection data may be sampled, for example, at a rate of 32 times per cycle wherein cycle refers to power distribution system 10 line frequency. A second data area 612 may include metering sample data, also received from current sensor 82 and voltage sensor 84. Metering sample data may be sampled, for example, at a rate of 64 times per cycle. A third data area 614 may include waveform capture and harmonic analysis data that is sampled at a third rate, for example 128 times per cycle. Communication payload area 602 may include any number of data areas, only three areas are illustrated by way of example and are not limiting in the number of data areas that may be included in communication payload area 602. Additionally, the above data sample rates are given by way of example and are not limiting in the rate at which sampled data may be stored in communication payload area 602.
Digital message packet 600 is sent at a frequency based on a resolution requirement determined by CCPU 24. A single digital message packet 600 may contain a plurality of samples in each of data areas 610, 612, and 614 depending on the frequency at which digital message packet 600 is sent to CCPU 24. Such a method of sending sample data facilitates effectively using an available bandwidth.
The sample rate for sampling the source may be selected to satisfy at least one of a plurality of predetermined algorithmic data rates. For example, the rate may be selected to facilitate achieving a maximum algorithmic data rate and/or to satisfy a predetermined oversampling requirement. Additionally, the sampling rate and/or the oversampling rate, the decimation, the packet rate, and/or a destination address for each message may be modified based on a system resource availability, a network communication noise level, a data signal-to-noise ratio, a change in a number of network nodes, a communication channel utilization, and an authorization of parameters change, and a service request. Each of the above considerations may be changing dynamically during operation of power distribution system 10, such that the sampling rate and/or the oversampling rate, the decimation, the packet rate, and/or a destination address for each message may be determined periodically to satisfy the data transfer needs of power distribution system 10.
Other considerations for determining the sampling rate may include facilitating minimizing a packet transmission overhead, facilitating meeting a predetermined algorithmic latency requirement, facilitating meeting a network data capacity, facilitating minimizing a packet error rate, facilitating minimizing the penalty of a retransmission, facilitating minimizing lost data, facilitating minimizing invalid data, and facilitating maximizing a number of network nodes.
Selection of a decimation of the samples may be based on a functional area for which the sample is being made. For example, a sample rate for power distribution system basic protection data may be less than or slower than a sample rate for power distribution system metering data. Likewise for power distribution system waveform capture data, power distribution system digital oscillography data, and power distribution system harmonic data analysis data. Each functional area data type may have a changing data rate associated with it such that a sample rate for power distribution system metering data may at times be less than the sample rate for power distribution system basic protection data.
Selection of a decimation of the samples may be based on a demand from a remote processor, such as, CCPU 24, a remote monitoring and diagnostics service request, a predetermined periodicity, and a communication network loading. A plurality of decimation operations in the decimation processor are selected based on at least one of the algorithmic data rates and outputs labeled by the decimation operations include base data, incremental data, and a plurality of tags for each of the base data and for each of the incremental data. At least part of the base data and incremental data may be stored in a local data buffer.
The transmitted 708 packets are received through a remote processor such as CCPU 24, each of the incremental data in the packet are prioritized, and using the incremental data, the received data in the packets is progressively reconstructed with increasing data rate and quantization based on the labeling. Base data is obtained by decimation corresponding to a predetermined slowest algorithmic data rate wherein each incremental data output is based on an increasing algorithmic data rate, and/or a quantization requirement. In the exemplary embodiment, the sample rate is selected such that the base data and the incremental data are sent at the same packet rate and the sampling rate is equal to double a predetermined algorithmic data rate. The decimation includes selecting every other sample as the base data, and the alternate every other data as the incremental data and the base data and the incremental data are packetized in the same packet. In the exemplary embodiment, the base data and the incremental data are interleaved such that the incremental data of lowest priority are replaced with either base data, or incremental data of higher priority of previously packetized data. Transmitted packets may be transmitted redundantly to facilitate reducing a data error rate based on network communications conditions.
Service data may be provided to CCPU 24 by replacing at least one of the base data and the incremental data with the data requested, which may include system resources data, communication noise data, signal-to-noise ratio data, data indicating changes in the number of network nodes, communication channel utilization data, authorization of parameters change data, and service requested data. Service requested data includes system status data, local status data, local health data, communication data, signal-to-noise ratio data, event history data, and error history data. Such data is periodically requested by CCPU 24 to update sample rates, packet rates and other system parameters based on current system condition and data transmission needs.
Each packet includes a destination address, and for each destination with active algorithms, packetizing the base data and the incremental data in the same packet includes tagging each of the base data and each of the incremental data. The base data is packaged and the incremental data is prioritized based on latency requirements of the active algorithms at the destination. Packaging the corresponding incremental data is done in decreasing priority order and may be based on of available space in the packet and a predetermined maximum packet length. The maximum packet length may be determined based on a packet rate, a network data capacity, a length that facilitates maximizing the number of nodes in the network communication system. The tags used to tag each of the base data and each of the incremental data may be an implicit tag, a partial tag, a time stamp tag, and/or a counter tag. The destination address in each digital message packet may include a unicast destination address for data specific to each respective destination, a multicast destination address for data common to a set of destinations, and a broadcast destination address for data common to all destinations. Destination addresses may be selected based on facilitating minimizing a packet transmission overhead, facilitating meeting a predetermined algorithmic latency requirement, facilitating meeting a network data capacity, and facilitating maximizing a number of network nodes.
The above-described power distribution system communication system is cost-effective and highly reliable. Each system includes at least one central control processing unit (CCPU) and a plurality of node electronics unit communicatively coupled via a high-speed digital network. There may be additional CCPUs and corresponding network backbones coupled in the power distribution system to facilitate meeting a system reliability goal. Each node electronics unit communicates to every CCPU via a digital message packet that facilitates efficient communication while maintaining a system latency requirement. Accordingly, the power distribution system communication system facilitates protection and optimization of power system operation in a cost-effective and reliable manner.
Exemplary embodiments of power distribution system communication system components are described above in detail. The components are not limited to the specific embodiments described herein, but rather, components of each system may be utilized independently and separately from other components described herein. Each power distribution system communication system component can also be used in combination with other power distribution system components.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/359,544 filed on Feb. 25, 2002 for “Integrated Protection, Monitoring, and Control” the content of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/438,159 filed on Jan. 6, 2003 for “Single Processor Concept for Protection and Control of Circuit Breakers in Low-Voltage Switchgear” the content of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3772505 | Massell | Nov 1973 | A |
3938007 | Boniger et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3956671 | Nimmersjo | May 1976 | A |
3963964 | Mustaphi | Jun 1976 | A |
4001742 | Jencks et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4245318 | Eckart et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4291299 | Hinz et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4301433 | Castonguay et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4311919 | Nail | Jan 1982 | A |
4415968 | Maeda et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4423459 | Stich et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4432031 | Premerlani | Feb 1984 | A |
4455612 | Girgis et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4468714 | Russell | Aug 1984 | A |
4589074 | Thomas et al. | May 1986 | A |
4623949 | Salowe et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4631625 | Alexander et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4642724 | Ruta | Feb 1987 | A |
4652966 | Farag et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4672501 | Bilac et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4672555 | Hart et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4674062 | Premerlani | Jun 1987 | A |
4689712 | Demeyer | Aug 1987 | A |
4709339 | Fernandes | Nov 1987 | A |
4751653 | Junk et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4752853 | Matsko et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4754407 | Nolan | Jun 1988 | A |
4777607 | Maury et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4783748 | Swarztrauber et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4796027 | Smith-Vaniz | Jan 1989 | A |
4833592 | Yamanaka | May 1989 | A |
4849848 | Ishii | Jul 1989 | A |
4855671 | Fernandes | Aug 1989 | A |
4862308 | Udren | Aug 1989 | A |
4964058 | Brown, Jr. | Oct 1990 | A |
4979122 | Davis et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4983955 | Ham, Jr. et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4996646 | Farrington | Feb 1991 | A |
5053735 | Ohishi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5060166 | Engel et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5101191 | MacFadyen et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5134691 | Elms | Jul 1992 | A |
5136458 | Durivage, III | Aug 1992 | A |
5162664 | Haun et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166887 | Farrington et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5170310 | Studtmann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170360 | Porter et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179376 | Pomatto | Jan 1993 | A |
5182547 | Griffith | Jan 1993 | A |
5185705 | Farrington | Feb 1993 | A |
5196831 | Bscheider | Mar 1993 | A |
5214560 | Jensen | May 1993 | A |
5216621 | Dickens | Jun 1993 | A |
5225994 | Arinobu et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5231565 | Bilas et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5237511 | Caird et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247454 | Farrington et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253159 | Bilas et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5272438 | Stumme | Dec 1993 | A |
5301121 | Garverick et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305174 | Morita et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311392 | Kinney et al. | May 1994 | A |
5323307 | Wolf et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5353188 | Hatakeyama | Oct 1994 | A |
5361184 | El-Sharkawi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367427 | Matsko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369356 | Kinney et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5381554 | Langer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384712 | Oravetz et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5402299 | Bellei | Mar 1995 | A |
5406495 | Hill | Apr 1995 | A |
5414635 | Ohta | May 1995 | A |
5420799 | Peterson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422778 | Good et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5440441 | Ahuja | Aug 1995 | A |
5451879 | Moore | Sep 1995 | A |
5487016 | Elms | Jan 1996 | A |
5490086 | Leone et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493468 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5530738 | McEachern | Jun 1996 | A |
5534782 | Nourse | Jul 1996 | A |
5534833 | Castonguay et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537327 | Snow et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544065 | Engel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559719 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560022 | Dunstan et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5576625 | Sukegawa et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581471 | McEachern et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587917 | Elms | Dec 1996 | A |
5596473 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600527 | Engel et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608646 | Pomatto | Mar 1997 | A |
5613798 | Braverman | Mar 1997 | A |
5619392 | Bertsch et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627716 | Lagree et al. | May 1997 | A |
5627717 | Pein et al. | May 1997 | A |
5627718 | Engel et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629825 | Wallis et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631798 | Seymour et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638296 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5650936 | Loucks et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5661658 | Putt et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666256 | Zavis et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670923 | Gonzalez et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694329 | Pomatto | Dec 1997 | A |
5696695 | Ehlers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719738 | Singer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734576 | Klancher | Mar 1998 | A |
5736847 | Van Doorn et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5737231 | Pyle et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742513 | Bouhenguel et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751524 | Swindler | May 1998 | A |
5754033 | Thomson | May 1998 | A |
5754440 | Cox et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768148 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784237 | Velez | Jul 1998 | A |
5784243 | Pollman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786699 | Sukegawa et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5812389 | Katayama et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821704 | Carson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825643 | Dvorak et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828576 | Loucks et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828983 | Lombardi | Oct 1998 | A |
5831428 | Pyle et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5867385 | Brown et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872722 | Oravetz et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872785 | Kienberger | Feb 1999 | A |
5890097 | Cox | Mar 1999 | A |
5892449 | Reid et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903426 | Ehling | May 1999 | A |
5905616 | Lyke | May 1999 | A |
5906271 | Castonguay et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926089 | Sekiguchi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936817 | Matsko et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946210 | Montminy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5958060 | Premerlani | Sep 1999 | A |
5963457 | Kanoi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973481 | Thompson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973899 | Williams et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982595 | Pozzuoli | Nov 1999 | A |
5982596 | Spencer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995911 | Hart | Nov 1999 | A |
6005757 | Shvach et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005758 | Spencer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018451 | Lyke et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038516 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047321 | Raab et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054661 | Castonguay et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055145 | Lagree et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061609 | Kanoi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084758 | Clarey et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6138241 | Eckel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139327 | Callahan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141196 | Premerlani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157527 | Spencer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167329 | Engel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175780 | Engel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185482 | Egolf et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185508 | Van Doorn et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186842 | Hirschbold et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195243 | Spencer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198402 | Hasegawa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212049 | Spencer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233128 | Spencer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236949 | Hart | May 2001 | B1 |
6242703 | Castonguay et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6268991 | Criniti et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285917 | Sekiguchi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288882 | DiSalvo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289267 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291911 | Dunk et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292340 | O'Regan et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292717 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292901 | Lys et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297939 | Bilac et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313975 | Dunne et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6341054 | Walder et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347027 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351823 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356422 | Bilac et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356849 | Jaffe | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369996 | Bo | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373855 | Downing et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377051 | Tyner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385022 | Kulidjian et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396279 | Gruenert | May 2002 | B1 |
6397155 | Przydatek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405104 | Dougherty | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406328 | Attarian et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411865 | Qin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441931 | Moskovich et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459997 | Andersen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496342 | Horvath et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535797 | Bowles et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549880 | Willoughby et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553418 | Collins et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556560 | Katseff et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20010010032 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010032025 | Lenz et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044588 | Mault | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048354 | Douville et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055276 | Rogers et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055965 | Delp et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010518 | Reid et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032535 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020034086 | Scoggins et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045992 | Shincovich et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059401 | Austin | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063635 | Shincovich | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064010 | Nelson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091949 | Ykema | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094799 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107615 | Bjorklund | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108065 | Mares | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109722 | Rogers et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111980 | Miller et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114285 | LeBlanc | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116092 | Hamamatsu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124011 | Baxter et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020146076 | Lee | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020146083 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147503 | Osburn, III | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159402 | Binder | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162014 | Przydatek et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163918 | Cline | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165677 | Lightbody et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181174 | Bilac et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193888 | Wewalaarachchi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030043785 | Liu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040071132 | Sundqvist et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090994 | Lockridge et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040213203 | Lucioni | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223510 | Tzannes et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050152382 | Stirling et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0718948 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0723325 | Jul 1996 | EP |
WO 02052240 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030214907 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60359544 | Feb 2002 | US | |
60438159 | Jan 2003 | US |