The present invention relates to usage of pre-fabricated elements in a directionally flexible and watertight tunnel course for special or general use.
More specifically, the invention relates to a method for constructing tunnel courses which are completely or partly surrounded by rock formations and/or are located in open air, the tunnel course in its longitudinal direction consisting of a plurality of mutually separate, pre-fabricated, preferably tunnel arch forming structural elements which are intended to be sealed against each other or adjacent each other. Further, the invention relates to a structural element in order to apply the method.
Tunnel manufacturing technology is e.g. known from the following patent publications: EP 0.197.021, GB 2.068.894, U.S. Pat. No. 4,895,480, DE 4.014.437 and DE 3.210.529.
Traditional or special solutions for establishing tunnel linings or tunnel courses have in most cases highly limited possibilities to fulfill all required specifications simultaneously as regards costs, life, tightness, safeguarding against rock avalanche etc.
Apart from tunnels having full-profile drilling made using tunnel boring machine (TBM), most tunnels are made using conventional drilling and blasting after adapted injection sealing of unbroken rock formations from so-called “tunnel face”, followed by securing by means of rock bolts and sprayable concrete.
The configuration of the tunnel lining proper exhibits many variants. Concrete elements are known to be fixedly bolted at the sides with a variant of “umbrella” below the hang in the “ceiling”, which could consist of a flexible insulating plate and which later proved to have short durability and be highly inflammable, have subsequently been attempted covered by sprayed concrete. It is however known that these repairs, in a time perspective, still have a very short life, and after a few tens of years most thereof is back to status quo. A precondition for this and all other known methods is extensive securing works in the form of bolt-work and possibly use of sprayable concrete, because required inspection and status checking later is almost quite impossible to perform.
Further, tunnel linings which include a movable material will represent an inherent risk, because the protective layer over time may crack due to fatigue and with the risk of drop-down or avalanche.
Tunnel courses which have been secured or made by means of sprayed concrete fall into approximately the same risk pattern. The method requires as an outset an almost watertight rock space after blasting operation, as it is challenging to spray concrete onto rock having water leaks. However, in present days technological situation related to sprayed concrete, the situation is such that this by itself is not sufficient for satisfactory tightness in the structure, but almost always requires additional safe-guarding measures against water and frost. Ongoing research related to sprayable membranes appears uncertain, and it is likely that the complete “spraying method” also will be quite expensive. Constructing a safe tunnel lining by means of sprayable concrete is quite expensive and there are obvious limits to the amounts of fiber loaded concrete that can be applied, without triggering a requirement for more traditional reinforcement.
Concrete in the context of tunnels is vulnerable due to leakages and bursting due to frost with subsequent disintegration of the concrete. Complete casting of a tunnel lining solves to a large extent requirements related to securing of rock, but have obvious weaknesses related to tightness and expenses. A non-reinforced, fully casted tunnel lining is highly vulnerable to leakages from formation of fissures and cracks due to quite often highly variable thickness of the tunnel lining, which yields large local stresses in the concrete resulting in cracking thereof. Repair thereof yields often an excessive demand for expensive injection sealing of the tunnel lining later. Reinforced tunnel lining is much more expensive, without any decisive guarantee against formations of fissures and unacceptable leakages through the concrete.
Fully covering tunnel linings have also proved to exhibit substantial challenges. The sudden collapse of the ceiling of the Hanekleiv tunnel in the county of Vestfold, Norway some years ago is a typical example of how risky such a structure may be. Government authorities also emphasize that there are substantial problems related to inspecting the securing of the rock in these tunnels, both as regards accessability and a health hazard environment for the controlling personnel.
An external membrane on the tunnel lining, also sometimes as multiple layers, as a foil between concrete and rock, presents a further turning of the screw of expenses. In addition, there is hardly any installation of membrane anywhere in the world which has solved the problems without a time-consuming and frustrating search for stray leakages.
In order to remedy the problem, it is these days attempted to establish complex injection systems by means of injection hoses to section the problems, which results in a wilderness of supply hoses which are likely difficult to administrate.
In addition, membrane entrepreneurs set substantial requirements to the smoothness and tightness of the surface, as welding membranes with water flowing likely is no wanted situation. There are present “patent pending” solutions for a continuous casting of a tunnel lining, which is usually named as sliding formwork, although the method is somewhat different. As far as known, none of these methods have been used in practise.
In summary, it is an obvious and common feature of all known methods today that the tunnel after blasting operations and before the next step, should be 100% secured and be almost watertight.
The present tunnel technologies therefore face numerous challenges, even though data controlled drilling rigs, sophisticated injection technique and fiber-reinforced spraying of concrete have improved the conditions substantially for different solutions related to tunnel linings of different types. Still, within the technology of tunnels there has in many aspects for a long time been a clear demand for novel considerations, for the purpose of solving all or most of the known problems. The expenses related to making tunnels are today prohibitively large due to a deficient relationship between the technical problems which arise and the practical solutions.
The present invention aims therefore to provide technical solutions which fully or partly solve the deficiencies, also by using known technique.
The method will prove to be highly cost efficient and the extent of today's expensive needs for securing by using installation of bolts, sprayable concrete and injection can be dramatically reduced. The tunnel lining as a structure will be almost maintenance free and exhibit an almost ever lasting life; 300 years or more.
According to the invention the method mentioned in the introduction is characterized by:
Further embodiments of the method appear from the sub-ordinate patent claims 2-15.
Said structural element as mentioned in the introduction is primarily characterized in that the element on the outside at each edge thereof which is transverse to the longitudinal direction of the tunnel course, is provided with a first outer flexible formwork half which is configured to be interconnected with a corresponding second outer flexible formwork half on a neighbouring further element when that further element is positioned next to said first element, to form a flexible formwork for receiving injectable concrete between the neighbouring structural elements.
Further embodiments related to this structural element appear from the sub-ordinate patent claims 17-25.
The invention is now to be described with reference to the attached drawings which exhibit non-limiting embodiments of the invention.
a illustrates a grooved profile for formwork skirt part in a concrete element.
b illustrates in principle edge fitting fixedly pressed onto the edge of a net part.
a illustrates formwork skirt part with edge fitting established in a grooved profile.
b illustrates net part directly moulded into an element.
a illustrates establishment of formwork skirt part which has a membrane applied thereto.
b illustrates formwork skirt part moulded into a concrete element with a membrane applied thereto.
a illustrates an electrified smoothing jetty at operating positions upon executing a step of deploying smoothing- and structural concrete at the tunnel foundation.
b illustrates in principle individual drive units for a smoothing jetty resting on pivot pins.
c illustrates in principle embodiment of a tunnel foundation by means of “bulkheads”.
Although the invention will be mainly described related to tunnel arch forming elements made from concrete, it will be appreciated that such tunnel arch forming elements could instead be in the form of lightweight elements made as a sandwich structure, as shown and described in the context of the embodiments shown on
Following interconnection 11 of the two net parts 2′, 2″ at the opening between the elements 3, 3′ 4, 4′ 5, 5′ being adjacent in the tunnel direction, as shown in
Water leaking in through the rock surface 10 behind the formwork bag 2 during injection of concrete for establishing the interspace cast 14, will most likely after some wash-out of the concrete 14 at the front upon direct contact with the rock surface 10 be pressed laterally and represent a reduced risk for unacceptable amounts of binder agent in the interspace cast 14 being washed out.
Strong flows of water into the tunnel at locations where the interspace cast 14 is supposed to contact the rock surface 10, must in advance be sealed or guided away in a satisfactory manner, e.g. by suspending plastic material on the rock surface 10 or let a suitable length of relatively rigid plastic foil, in the form of a roll of plastics fitted onto reinforcing steel bar, from the top side “roll downwardly” over the opening between the elements 3, 4, 5; 3′, 4′, 5′, whereafter the plastics can be attached at the upper end before the net parts 2, 2′ are interconnected at 11. Simultaneously with the plastics foil being moved outwardly upon injection of the mass of concrete to form the interspace cast 14, it will protect the concrete against unwanted wash-out and guide leakages laterally, where the water in turn will disappear through drainage and casting assisting pipes 26, 26′ (
There is on
The situation shown on
As shown on
In order that the method in addition may be adapted to seamless transition for cambering at curves, it will be advantageous that the top element 5 is not completely torsionally rigid, but to some extent may adapt itself to the side elements 3, 4 on which the top element 5 should rest. The elements 3,4 will necessarily get a different direction at their top, because opposed base elements 6,7 at respective sides of the tunnel course then will be located so that the free end of one base element 6 will be at a level different from the oppositely located base element 7. The top element 5, due to inherent elasticity in the element 5, will within certain limitations adapt itself to the top of the side elements 3,4. If this elasticity proves to be insufficient, it will in practise be possible to allow additional forces to force the elements 3, 4, 5 together at a joint 20-20″″ between arch elements (see
Upon interconnection at the radial edges (not shown) of the elements 3, 4, 5, the interconnection will with advantage be hided in the interspace cast 14. It is not likely that the elements, e.g. 3, 4, 5 will be structurally damaged by such a rough handling if the effect of applied forces lies well within pre-specified limits of tolerance. Even though the side elements 3,4 and the top elements 5 on their outside are covered by membrane 17 or have membrane 17 applied thereto, it will be appreciated that the membrane 17 will still be 100% intact after such an adaptation.
In a method as indicated, the side edges of the elements 3, 4, 5 will appear with a minor “stepping”, but this is considered unproblematic, as these unevennesses are compensated by the inner formwork 12 and the interspace casts 14-14″″.
A logic consequence of all of these conditions yields that the width of the interspace cast 14 may preferably also be varied to obtain different advantages, as increased width provides a wider and stronger interspace cast 14 which will provide better support of the masses of rock 10, whereas a more narrow interspace cast 14 first of all will reduce the volume of concrete in the context in question. If the concept is complete casting, i.e. complete filling of the cavity with mass of concrete between the tunnel lining 1 and the rock surface 10, this plays mainly a minor role, except for the need for securing. Due to the nature of the invention, it will be unproblematic in the course of operation to reserve temporary open spaces in the tunnel lining 1 in order to later be able to install the missing elements 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and establish the tunnel lining 1 as originally presupposed.
Further, it is of advantage that the elements 3, 4, 5; 3′, 4′, 5′ can be manufactured with different radius of curvature or other preferred geometry, and that alternatives of concrete concepts can be used, as e.g. normal concrete, light-weight concrete, concrete with sintered particles, porous concrete etc. The structural strength and degree of reinforcement of the elements 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 are mainly related to the elements 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 being capable of handling from manufacturing to completed installation. Beyond this, some requirements will be that that a flexible formwork 2 is attachable to the outside of the arch elements 3, 4, 5 and that a membrane 17 can be applied to the outside.
Further,
The situation as clearly shown on
The water tightening at the connection between structural concrete in the foundation 28, base element 6; 7, (see
As shown on
The support of the element bases 6, 7 relative to underlying terrain is preferably made using conventionally reinforced concrete which can either be filled around the element bases 6, 7 in a “ditch”, in conventional formwork or against a flexible formwork 8, 9 attached at location 18 into the base elements 6,7. A precondition for establishing a tunnel course 1 in open terrain is obviously that the fundamentation takes place either on rocky ground or on compressed, not ground-frost-risky bed. When performing “free” casting using “the formwork bag” 2, it will when filled with concrete mass necessarily get a somewhat different cross-section outside the tunnel elements 3, 4, 5. From the element bases 6; 7 and further up along the tunnel arch, the cross-section will vary from a circular shape to a gradually more oval cross-section. This is however no problem, as the interspace cast 14 thereby becomes preferably more huge at the “root” of the tunnel lining 1 where the loads from any filling are the largest. If required, the interspace cast 14 can here, as inside a tunnel in rock, be reinforced more or less, but this must be assessed in each case. As for tunnel lining 1 in a tunnel in rock, the arch elements 3, 4, 5 have applied on the outside thereof a membrane 17 which is considered satisfactory.
Sealing of joints vertically and horizontally between the tunnel elements can be executed as for the invention in general. In order to stabilize the arch elements 3, 4, 5; 3′, 4′, 5′ until the interspace cast 14 has been made and has hardened, it will have to be considered whether the elements 3, 4, 5; 3′, 4′, 5′ in addition must be supported by stays. An obvious advantageous solution for stabilizing the elements 3, 4, 5; 3′, 4′, 5′ would be to mould into these a plurality of steel plates on the inside along the elements 3, 4, 5 (see
Upon rehabilitation of tunnels in general and in particular road tunnels, the invention can be implemented without extensive changes, as shown on
Crane track 68 with stay bolts 67, 67′ for the crane rail and associated threaded casings 30, 30′ for the bolts 67, 67′ can be installed, and an advantageous formwork structure 12 can enable that the tunnel can be kept open for adapted traffic over prolonged periods of the day.
It will be appreciated that the base elements 6; 7 should, in a conventional manner be provided transversely and along their entire length with reinforcement, and as indicated by reference numeral 39″.
Due to the favourable flexible formwork 8; 9, see
At a location where multiple element bases 6, 6′, 6″, 6′″ . . . are to be moulded into the interspace cast 24, 24′, 24″ . . . simultaneously, the ends of the net parts 8, 8′, 8″, 8′ are attached together transversely of the longitudinal direction of the tunnel course in satisfactory manner and will thus form a continuous flexible formwork 8; 9. Before making an interspace cast 24 between base element 6; 7 and exposed rock surface 10, it is necessary to deploy the nets 8; 9 up along the rock surface 10 and if necessary attach the nets 8; 9 to the rock surface 10 at a plurality of locations by means of pegs 66, if there is a risk for the mass of concrete to “brush away” the nets 8; 9 before mass of concrete in fact has landed on the nets 8; 9 and loaded these nets. The friction between the nets 8; 9 loaded by mass of concrete and the rock surface 10 will soon stop the movement of the nets 8; 9 down the rock surface 10 and mass of concrete can be supplied to a desirable level, which should lie somewhat below the top of the base element 6; 7. An obvious precondition is that the width of the net parts 8; 9 is sufficient, and the width of the net parts 8; 9 should in general be calculated from the attachment 18′ of the net parts 8; 9, vertically down to the rock surface 10 and up along that surface to a height at the upper edge of the base 6; 7. Around the legs 34, 34′ of the anchoring tower 36, the net parts 8; 9 must be split for subsequently to be joined together again in a sufficient way, or that the net parts 8; 9 are interconnected around the legs 34, 34′ of the anchoring tower 36 where the net parts 8, 8′, 8″; 9, 9′, 9″ . . . continuously continue.
It may be favorable in order to limit the use of net material 8; 9, and to make a safe and predictable cast work 24 between the base elements 6; 7 and the rock 10, systematically to insert a plurality of “pegs” 66 in the rock surface 10 before the base elements 6; 7 are installed. The pegs 66 can favourably consist of short pieces of reinforcement steel bars which are put down into angled holes drilled a short distance into the rock surface 10. After the base elements 6; 7 have been installed, the net parts 8; 9 are deployed up along the rock surface 10 and firmly hooked onto the plurality of pegs 66, . . . which are located in the direction of the tunnel course at suitable distance from the upper edge of the net parts 8; 9.
In practice, it may prove advantageous that the drainage pipe/the casting assisting pipes 26 are led through adapted holes in the net 8, 9 and clamped to the rock surface 10 at their top, the end of the pipes being at sufficient height and possibly temporarily closed off. After completion of the cast 24 the pipes 26 can immediately be opened or be cut to possibly lead away unwanted water flowing down onto the cast concrete 24. The pipes 26 are in any case later to be cut down so that they coincide with the upper face of the interspace cast 24, and so that leakage water from the rock surface 10 down onto the interspace cast 24 is guided away via the pipes 26-26′″.
The drainage pipes 26-26′″ should be dimensioned so strong that they later and without problems can function as casting assisting pipes upon connection to and injection of mass of concrete between the cast 24, 24′ related to the base, the interspace cast 14, 14′ and the arch elements 3, 4, 5; 3′, 4′, 5′
If the cavity between the arch elements 3,4,5 and the masses of rock 10 is to be filled completely with mass of concrete, this must necessarily take place while the drainage-/casting assisting pipes 26 are available from the inside of the tunnel, i.e. before the tunnel foundation 25, 28 is established.
In order to ease the making of the cast 24 between the base elements 6; 7 and rock 10, it may be advantageous to arrange a wide and funnel shaped channel of concrete with rollers (not shown) and which is pulled on the edge of the base element 6; 7 to minimize spillage of concrete and to control the path of the concrete down closely adjacent the lower edge of the base 6; 7. In any case, the top of the base 6; 7 and the bearing 22 in the base element is cleaned and is possibly washed with water while the concrete is fresh. If mass of concrete from the interspace cast 24 or the net 8; 9 is found on the end of the last base element 6; 7, it must be removed completely before the next base element 6; 7 is brought into position.
Advantageously, the invention permits that there can be installed many pre-fabricated base elements 6; 7 successively and that the cast 24 which secures the base elements 6, 7 firmly to neighbouring masses of rock 10 can be made without any need whatsoever for conventional formwork, in view of instead using the nets 8; 9.
Further details shown on the section (see also
The radius of curvature of the bearing 22 for the base element 6, 7 must necessarily be somewhat larger than the radius of curvature of the bottom of arch element 3, 4.
On
If it calculationwise or based on experience proves necessary to prevent lateral slide-out of the arch elements 3, 4, 5 by injection of concrete mass for the cast 14, there can favourably be placed one or more two-piece anchoring bolts 38, 38′ from threaded casings fixedly moulded in the elements 3, 4; 3′, 4′, and which later are welded together at location 38″.
On the vertical view there is further illustrated interconnection 11 of the neighbouring net parts 2′, 2″ which together will constitute the flexible formwork “bag” 2. Due to the obvious situation in the opening between the arch elements 3, 3′; 4, 4′; 5, 5′ and the net parts 2′, 2″, it will be favourable to pull the net parts 2′, 2″ in through the opening between the elements 3, 3′; 4, 4′; 5, 5′, place the net parts 2′, 2″ against each other as shown on
The interconnection 11 can obviously be solved through alternative methods, but the preferred one is to “sew” together the net parts 2′, 2″ by means of e.g. steel wire 11 or other interconnection means, which is of the same length or somewhat longer than the total length of the net parts 2′; 2″. Onto the end of the steel wire 11 can be fitted a needle of suitable length, and the wire 11 can likely favourably be threaded through the net parts 2′, 2″ from the top of the arch and downwards at both sides, by letting the wire 11 run over a pulley (not shown) temporarily hung onto the edge of the top element 5, 5′.
After interconnection of the net parts 2, 2′ in the opening between the arch elements 3, 4, 5; 3′, 4′, 5′, the respective ends of the wire 11 must be anchored in the respective base elements 6; 7 in that it is as a standard procedure made an minor cut-out or “loop” 43 at the middle of the members 37 (see
Midway in on the base element 6, 7, the wire 11 can be anchored in the same manner by fixedly welding a supportive member 37 to a steel plate 85 moulded into the top of the base 6, 7. Alternatively, there can be fixedly welded a loop (not shown) to that same plate 85 where the wire can be anchored in a safe way. Independent of how the wire 11 is anchored, it is very important that the net parts 2′, 2″ are joined in such a manner that there is created a tight “bottom” in the formwork bag 2 completely in towards the outer faces of the arch elements 3, 3′; 4, 4′ and that it is shaped so that the “bottom” of the bag 2 may rest on the top of the interspace cast 24.
Transverse joining interconnection 86 (see
In the base elements 6, 7 there must be included embedded articles having specific tasks. In the bottom of the base 6; 7 there must, as previously indicated, be embedded (moulded in) sufficiently large and anchored plates 33, 33′ of steel at the ends of the base 6; 7, as well as embedding (moulding in) at the top and ends of the base 6; 7 the previously mentioned plates of steel 32, 32′, 32″, 32′″. At the mid region and top of the bases 6, 7 there must be embedded (moulded in) plates 85, 85′ of steel for firmly welding of a heavy duty slab or flat member on edge corresponding to supportive member 37 as bedding for the foot of the curved formwork 12 and pivot bearing 55. Further, it must be moulded into the bottom of the base element 6; 7 a recess profile 39′ for attachment of said skirts 8; 9, as will be more closely explained. Even though all embedded (moulded-in) units are not used in each installation situation, it will be quite advantageous that the base elements 6, 7 are symmetric about both axes of the base elements 6, 7. This yields much better flexibility, because fitting 18′ of the net parts 8, 9 and the steel plates 32, 32′ on the top of the base elements 6, 7 for establishing of a fitting for the foot of the curved formwork 12, will not require any attention and control before the base elements 6, 7 must be directionally oriented before transport into the tunnel course, as the length of the elements 6, 7 in some cases possibly does not permit a turnaround of the elements 6, 7 inside the tunnel course.
The element bases 6,7 can with advantage be moulded and transported “upside-down”, preferably with lowered lifting devices (not shown) moulded into the underside of the element bases 6,7, as this will also ease storage of the elements 6, 7. This is also preferable because this must necessarily be the position of the element 6; 7 when the formwork skirt/net 8; 9 is to be fixedly inserted at attachment location 18. The net 8, 9 to be used for fixing the element base 6; 7 through use of the interspace cast 24, may have far less strength against breakage than the net parts 2′, 2″ associated with the arch elements 3, 4, 5; 3′, 4′, 5′ and the attachment 18′ in the base elements 6, 7 can likely be made using a rapid hardening, expanding mortar.
If the base joints 23-23′″ are to be completely watertight, then there is in
As shown on
In
Alternatively, the sealing between sections of the arch elements 3, 4, 5 and/or arch element 3; 4 and base 6; 7 can consist of a closed-pore, compressible plate 45 having through-going perforations (as shown on
As shown on
If the injection paths 16″-16′″″ are to be re-injectable, then supply hoses 77-77′″ must be established at both ends of the respective injection path 16″-16″″ and led to the air side (inside) of all elements 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
Corresponding solution with supply hoses and plastic cup can correspondingly be provided for the injection path 16; 16′ on those edges of the elements 3, 4, 5 which are oriented transversely of the tunnel course.
A method for immediate water tightening of the element connections 20, 21 as shown on
Injection paths 16-16″″ for injectable sealing mass should still be implemented in the elements 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 as indicated to ensure an absolute possibility for supplemental tightening in a rational fashion at any time. The infiltration cushions 46, 46′ (see
The superior object of locating a joint mat 44, 44′ or joint packing 45, 45′ is to make the joints 20, 21 between the elements 3, 5; 4, 5; 3, 6; 4, 7 as compact as possible and simultaneously optimum injectable in that the sealing mass is reinforced and is also favourably spreadable in the entire width and length of the joint 20, 21.
The requirement related to the technical properties of the injection path 16, 16′ (see
Stabinor AS, Lier, Norway manufactures an injection hose which meets, by a good margin, all requirements in question related to such devices. Tests made in pressure chamber confirm that the injection hose resists an external water pressure of 5-6 bars without the injection hose being infiltrated by water in the chamber. The injection paths 16-16′″″ must by means of suitable devices be attached/installed on the formwork parts without the hose being affected in negative way when the formworks are disassembled.
The net parts 2′, 2″; 8, 9 can be attached in alternative ways, also purely mechanical.
A corresponding solution, such as shown on
Further, the drawing figures (see also
The elements 3, 4, 5; 3′, 4′, 5′ may if desirable, also in advance, get an inner coating or paint applied, which after cleaning of the concrete surface can obtain good adhesion and life duration, and ease cleaning and reduce carbonatisation of the concrete, although this in the context is less important as the reinforcement in the arch elements 3, 4, 5 after completion of the tunnel lining 1 has reduced importance and in addition has large coverage.
In the course of the installation process a possible positioning of the joint mat 44, the infiltration cushion 46 or joint package 45 must take place in a practical and acceptable manner.
After the elements 3, 4, 5 have assumed their final positions, the elements 3, 4, 5 jointly form a satisfactory stable structure until the interspace cast 14 has been made. The elements 3, 4, 5 do not have particularly much space for larger movements until the time for the interspace cast 14, but the elements 3, 4, 5 may in a simple manner by using wood material be blocked up against the rock surface 10 behind the attachment 18 of the net parts 2, 2′.
Thereafter, it is ready for interconnection 11 of the flexible net parts 2′, 2″ and installation of the inside formwork 12. If the elements 3, 4, 5 in practise do not obtain completely accurate mutual position in the longitudinal direction of the tunnel course, this has reduced importance as the formwork will cover sufficient area for making the interspace cast 14.
The installation machinery 52 for the arch elements 3, 4, 5 can preferably be movable on wheels, with a short and strong telescopic arm having rotation and tilt properties and a quick-coupling for attachment of the vacuum equipment 51 which connects to the arch elements 3, 4, 5. The installation machinery 52 may advantageously be placed on a three-axis frame controlled dumper chassis (not shown) with hydraulic supporting members for use when connecting to the elements 3, 4, 5 and/or during the installation phase. Further, the chassis should be utilised in such a way that there at the sides or at the rear can be arranged a “cradle” where the elements 3, 4, 5 can be provided with support during movement. Upon deconnection of the vacuum equipment 51, the installation machinery 52 may favourably also be used for other tasks with suitable equipment using the quick-coupling.
The foot of the curved formwork 12 may favourably be provided as a pivotal bearing 55, 55′ having its base on existing fixedly welded supportive members 37, 37′ at the joint 23 of the element base 6, 7; 6′, 7′ or to be attached “supportive members” 37″, 37′″ welded onto steel plates 32 at the middle of the base 6, 7. The supportive members 37, 37′, 37″ will in addition have an accurate positioning and will together with the moulded-in steel plates 32, 32′, 32″ . . . at the top of the bases 6, 7 straight away carry the loads which the tensioning of the formwork 12 yields.
Further, it is advantageous that the lower part of the formwork 12, 56; 12′, 56′ with concrete supply stub 80, 80′ are separate and independently installable and uninstallable towards the outside of the curved formwork. It will ease the releasing of the formwork 12, 12′ if the stub 80, 80′ with surrounding formwork plate 56, 56′ can be released from the curved formwork 12, 12′, and remain sitting on the concrete surface when the curved formworks 12, 12′ are lowered. In such a manner, the formwork plates 56, 56′ can be detached later and thereafter be installed back on the curved formworks 12, 12′ before the curved formworks 12, 12′ are erected the next time.
The formwork skin on the curved formworks 12, 12′ may preferably be made from a light and strong material having a replaceable coating on the outside. The method may presuppose that a plurality of pairs of curved formworks 12 are available, so that longer sections of the tunnel advantageously can simultaneously be provided with interspace casts 14. The formworks 12, 12′ may favourably be moved directly to next location or be stored in folded configuration.
In order that contacting cast 19, see
Due to the obvious possibilities offered by the invention to establish a tunnel lining 1 with a high degree of accuracy, also between opposite element bases 6, 7, it will be advantageous to develop mechanical equipment for smoothing the tunnel foundation 25, 28 (see
The logistics related to transporting elements 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 into the tunnel, can as regards the element bases 6, 7 be solved through transporting therein and deploying by means of a crane fitted vehicle. It will be advantageous if it in advance has been established and levelled a plurality of anchoring towers 36 (see
The crane track 68 is electrified and modular, and is—as mentioned—equipped with at least one travelling carriage 69, where the crane rail 68 successively is installed via stays 67, 67′ from threaded casings 30, 30′ cast into the arch elements 5 at suitable distance from the edges thereof in order that the interspace cast 14 (see
Other advantages of a crane track 68 is that it also can be used for other kinds of transport and that it is directly re-usable. The attachment devices 30, 30′ for the crane track 68-68″ can later be used for other permanent installations in the tunnel, e.g. armatures for lighting. The travelling carriages 69 with winch 83 may be operated by radio control, be provided with warning light/signal and automatic stop at obstructions located at regions of work. On
The aspects of the invention can be taken further to relate to future use of arch elements 74, 74′ having a sandwich structure as indicated on
Further, the concepts of the horizontal and vertical profiles of the arch elements of concrete, the base element, the flexible formworks, the inner formworks, ways of sealing, making interspace casts and foundations, smoothing cast, transporting and placing structural elements into position, and other aspects shown and described with respect to tunnel arch forming elements of concrete are equally or substantially applicable to tunnel arch forming elements of a sandwich structure.
A detailed description of these concepts and aspects of the invention is considered superfluous, as the description linked to the use of tunnel arch forming elements of concrete is fully instructive to the expert in the art if it is decided to use tunnel arch forming elements of sandwich structure.
Further, in some cases it is conceivable to use tunnel arch forming elements of concrete as well as tunnel arch forming elements of sandwich structure, suitably having corresponding dimensions or at least matchable dimensions. Thus, it could be visualized for a tunnel lining 1 of mainly tunnel arch forming elements of concrete to use for a few sections thereof tunnel arch forming elements of sandwich structure, or e.g. use a sandwich type arch element as top arch element (locking element) instead of a top element (locking element) of concrete. Alternatively, it could also be visualized to use arch elements of sandwich structure for the entire tunnel lining or a substantial part thereof.
As regards the sandwich structured embodiment, an outer, flexible formwork 2 is established and the cavity 13 is closed by means of a section based lid 76 of a construction corresponding to the elements, located in lid receiving recesses 75, 75′ in the elements 74, 74′ by means of a locking function. The lid 76 can at the linear edge have tongue and groove for mutual stabilization, and due to the low weight of the elements 74, 74′, it is unproblematic to move adjacent elements 74′ sideways, so that intended connection and engagement can be achieved. The interspace cast 14 can thereafter be created and the method is completed with a complete interspace cast 19 between rock 10 and arch elements 74, 74′. Injection paths 16 in all joints can in a favourable way be established and the arch elements 74, 74′ will obviously and inherently be completely watertight.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20110892 | Jun 2011 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2012/050112 | 6/21/2012 | WO | 00 | 6/18/2014 |