The field of invention relates generally to nano-fabrication of structures. More particularly, the present invention is directed to methods for controlling distribution of fluid components on a body in imprint lithographic processes.
Nano-scale fabrication involves the fabrication of very small structures, e.g., having features on the order of one nanometer or more. A promising process for use in nano-scale fabrication is known as imprint lithography. Exemplary imprint lithography processes are described in detail in numerous publications, such as United States published patent application 2004/0065976 filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/264,960, entitled “Method and a Mold to Arrange Features on a Substrate to Replicate Features having Minimal Dimensional Variability”; United States published patent application 2004/0065252 filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/264,926, entitled “Method of Forming a Layer on a Substrate to Facilitate Fabrication of Metrology Standards”; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,936,194, issued Aug. 30, 2005 and entitled “Functional Patterning Material For Imprint Lithography Processes,” all of which are assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
Referring to
Typically, polymerizable material 24 is disposed upon substrate 12 before the desired volume is defined between mold 16 and substrate 12. However, polymerizable material 24 may fill the volume after the desired volume has been obtained. After the desired volume is filled with polymerizable material 24, source 26 produces energy 28, which causes polymerizable material 24 to solidify and/or cross-link, forming polymeric material conforming to the shape of the substrate surface 25 and mold surface 18. Control of this process is regulated by processor 32 that is in data communication with stage 11 imprint head 20, fluid dispense system 22, and source 26, operating on a computer-readable program stored in memory 34.
An important characteristic with accurately forming the pattern in the polymerizable material is to reduce, if not prevent, adhesion to the mold of the polymeric material, while ensuring suitable adhesion to the substrate. This is referred to as preferential release and adhesion properties. In this manner, the pattern recorded in the polymeric material is not distorted during separation of the mold. Prior art attempts to improve the release characteristics employ a release layer on the surface of the mold. The release layer is typically hydrophobic and/or has low surface energy. The release layer adheres to the mold by covalent chemical bonding. Providing the release layer improves release characteristics. This is seen by minimization of distortions in the pattern recorded into the polymeric material that are attributable to mold separation. This type of release layer is referred to, for purposes of the present discussion, as an a priori release layer, i.e., a release layer that is solidified to the mold.
Another prior art attempt to improve release properties is described by Bender et al. in “Multiple Imprinting in UV-based Nanoimprint Lithography: Related Material Issues,” Microeletronic Engineering 61-62 (2002), pp. 407-413. Specifically, Bender et al. employ a mold having an a priori release layer in conjunction with a fluorine-treated UV curable material. To that end, a UV curable layer is applied to a substrate by spin-coating a 110 cPs UV curable fluid to form a UV curable layer. The UV curable layer is enriched with fluorine groups to improve the release properties.
A need exists, therefore, to improve the preferential release and adhesion properties of a mold employed in imprint lithography processes.
The present invention provides a method of controlling the distribution of a fluid on a body that features compensating for varying distribution of constituent components of a composition that move over a surface of a substrate. Specifically, the quantity of a surfactant component of a composition varied over the surface upon which the composition was spread to form a contiguous layer. Typically, the composition is deposited upon the surface as a plurality of spaced-apart droplets. It was discovered that the air-liquid interface of each droplet varied in dimension as the same was spread over the surface. This resulted in there being a depletion of surfactants, referred to as surfactant depletion regions (SDR) in the area of the contiguous layer proximate to the situs of the droplets and a surfactant rich region (SRR) in area of the layer located proximate to spaces between the droplets. This is believed to increase the probability that pitting of a solidified layer formed from the contiguous layer occurs. The pitting is believed to be attributable to, inter alia, from an uneven distribution of surfactant on the mold. A lamella layer is generated on the mold after each imprint. The lamella layer is formed primarily from surfactants present in the material disposed between the mold and the substrate during imprinting. An uneven distribution of surfactants in this material causes an uneven distribution of surfactants in the lamella layer. This in turn exacerbates the differences in surfactant quantities in the SDR and SRR as the number of imprints increases. To compensate for the varying distribution of surfactants in a given layer, the method includes generating a sequence of patterns of liquid upon a substrate, each of which includes a plurality of spaced-apart liquid regions, with interstices being defined between adjacent liquid regions. A second of the patterns of liquid of the sequence is arranged so that the liquid regions associated therewith are in superimposition with the interstices of a first of the patterns of liquid of the sequence. These and other embodiments are described below.
Referring to
Referring to both
The imprinting material is provided with the requisite properties to completely fill recessions 38 while covering surface 44 with a contiguous formation of the imprinting material. In the present embodiment, sub-portions 54 of imprinting material in superimposition with protrusions 40 remain after the desired, usually minimum, distance “d” has been reached. This action provides contiguous layer 50 with sub-portions 52 having a thickness t1, and sub-portions 54, having a thickness t2. Thicknesses “t1,” and “t2” may be any thickness desired, dependent upon the application. Thereafter, contiguous layer 50 is solidified by exposing the same to the appropriate curing agent, e.g., actinic energy, such as broadband ultra violet energy, thermal energy or the like, depending upon the imprinting material. This causes the imprinting material to polymerize and cross-link. The entire process may occur at ambient temperatures and pressures, or in an environmentally-controlled chamber with desired temperatures and pressures. In this manner, contiguous layer 50 is solidified to provide side 56 thereof with a shape conforming to a shape of a surface 58 of mold 36.
Referring to
Considering that the imprinting material is spread and patterned concurrently, with the pattern being subsequently solidified into contiguous layer 50 by exposure to radiation, it would be desired to have the composition wet surface of substrate 42 and/or mold 36 and to avoid subsequent pit or hole formation after polymerization. Were the imprinting material deposited employing spin-coating techniques, it would be desired to use higher viscosity materials, e.g., having a viscosity greater than 10 cPs and typically, several hundred to several thousand cPs, with the viscosity measurement being determined in the absence of a solvent. The total volume contained in droplets 46 may be such so as to minimize, or avoid, a quantity of the imprinting material from extending beyond the region of surface 44 in superimposition with mold 36, while obtaining desired thicknesses t1 and t2, e.g., through capillary attraction of the imprinting material with mold 36 and surface 44 and surface adhesion of the imprinting material.
In addition to the aforementioned characteristics, referred to as liquid phase characteristics, it is desirable that the composition provides the imprinting material with certain solidified phase characteristics. For example, after solidification of contiguous layer 50, it is desirable that preferential adhesion and release characteristics be demonstrated by the imprinting material. Specifically, it is beneficial for the composition from which the imprinting material is fabricated to provide contiguous layer 50 with preferential adhesion to substrate 42 and preferential release of mold 36. In this fashion, reduced is the probability of distortions in the recorded pattern resulting from the separation of mold 36 therefrom due to, inter alia, tearing, stretching or other structural degradation of contiguous layer 50.
For example, with reference to
The constituent components of the composition that form the imprinting material and layer 45 to provide the aforementioned characteristics may differ. This results from substrate 42 being formed from a number of different materials, i.e. providing differing magnitudes of adhering forces FA. As a result, the chemical composition of surface 44 varies dependent upon the material from which substrate 42 is formed. For example, substrate 42 may be formed from silicon, plastics, gallium arsenide, mercury telluride, and composites thereof. As mentioned above, substrate 42 may include one or more layers shown as primer layer 45, e.g., dielectric layer, metal layer, semiconductor layer, planarization layer and the like, upon which contiguous layer 50 is generated. To that end, primer layer 45 would be deposited upon a wafer 47 employing any suitable technique, such as chemical vapor deposition, spin-coating and the like. Additionally, primer layer 45 may be formed from any suitable material, such as silicon, germanium and the like. Additionally, mold 36 may be formed from several materials, e.g., fused-silica, quartz, indium tin oxide diamond-like carbon, MoSi, sol-gels and the like.
An exemplary composition that may be employed from which to form contiguous layer 50 is as follows:
An acrylate component of the bulk material, isobornyl acrylate (IBOA), has the following structure:
and comprises approximately 47% of COMPOSITION by weight, but may be present in a range of 20% to 80%, inclusive. As a result, the mechanical properties of solidified imprinting layer 134 are primarily attributable to IBOA. An exemplary source for IBOA is Sartomer Company, Inc. of Exton, Pa. available under the product designation SR 506.
The component n-hexyl acrylate (n-HA) has the following structure:
and comprises approximately 25% of bulk material by weight, but may be present in a range of 0% to 40%, inclusive. Also providing flexibility to formation 50, n-HA is employed to reduce the viscosity of the prior art bulk material so that bulk material, in the liquid phase, has a viscosity in a range 2-9 Centipoises, inclusive. An exemplary source for the n-HA component is the Aldrich Chemical Company of Milwaukee, Wis.
A cross-linking component, ethylene glycol diacrylate, has the following structure:
and comprises approximately 15% of bulk material by weight, and may be present in a range of 10% to 50%, inclusive. EGDA also contributes to the modulus and stiffness buildup, as well as facilitates cross-linking of n-HA and IBOA during polymerization of the bulk material.
An initiator component, 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-propan-1-one, is available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals of Tarrytown, N.Y. under the trade name DAROCUR® 1173, and has the following structure:
and comprises approximately 3% of the bulk material by weight, and may be present in a range of 1% to 5%, inclusive. The initiator is responsive to a broad band of ultra-violet radiation generated by a medium-pressure mercury lamp. In this manner, the initiator facilitates cross-linking and polymerization of the components of the bulk material. The constituent components of COMPOSITION, IBOA, n-HA, EGDA and 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-propan-1-one form the bulk material of the same.
A surfactant component, R1R2, is a non-ionic surfactant sold by Mason Chemical Company of Arlington Heights, Ill. under the product names MASURF® FS-2000. The surfactant component consists of approximately 2%, by weight, of the bulk material and acts as a release agent of COMPOSITION by facilitating preferential adhesion and release of contiguous layer 50, once solidified.
The advantages of this patterning process are manifold. For example, the thickness differential between protrusions 40 and recessions 38 facilitates formation, in substrate 42, of a pattern corresponding to the recorded pattern formed in contiguous layer 50. Specifically, the thickness differential between t1 and t2 of protrusions 40 and recession 38, respectively, results in a greater amount of etch time being required before exposing regions of substrate 42 in superimposition with protrusions 40 compared with the time required for regions of substrate 42 in superimposition with recession 52 being exposed. For a given etching process, therefore, etching will commence sooner in regions of substrate 42 in superimposition with recessions 38 than regions in superimposition with protrusions 40. This facilitates formation of a pattern in substrate corresponding to the aforementioned recorded pattern. By properly selecting the imprinting materials and etch chemistries, the relational dimensions between the differing features of the pattern eventually transferred into substrate 42 may be controlled as desired. To that end, it is desired that the etch characteristics of the recorded pattern, for a given etch chemistry, be substantially uniform.
As a result, the characteristics of the imprinting material are important to efficiently pattern substrate 42 in light of the unique patterning process employed. As mentioned above, the imprinting material is deposited on substrate 42 as a plurality of discrete and spaced-apart droplets 46. The combined volume of droplets 46 is such that the imprinting material is distributed appropriately over an area of surface 44 where the recorded pattern is to be formed. In this fashion, the total volume of the imprinting material in droplets 46 defines the distance “d”, to be obtained so that the total volume occupied by the imprinting material in the gap defined between mold 36 and the portion of substrate 42 in superimposition therewith once the desired distance “d” is reached is substantially equal to the total volume of the imprinting material in droplets 46. To facilitate the deposition process, it is desired that the imprinting material provide rapid and even spreading of the imprinting material in droplets 46 over surface 44 so that all thicknesses t1 are substantially uniform and all residual thicknesses t2 are substantially uniform.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring again to
Referring to
The embodiments of the present invention described above are exemplary. Many changes and modifications may be made to the disclosure recited above while remaining within the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention should not, therefore, be limited by the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. published patent application 2006-0062922-A1, filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/948,511 on Sep. 23, 2004 entitled “Polymerization Technique to Attenuate Oxygen Inhibition of Solidification of Liquids and Composition Therefor,” which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3810874 | Mitsch et al. | May 1974 | A |
3919351 | Chang et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4271258 | Watariguchi | Jun 1981 | A |
4512848 | Deckman et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4514439 | Rounds | Apr 1985 | A |
4517337 | Lockhart et al. | May 1985 | A |
4544572 | Sandvig et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4552833 | Ito et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4614667 | Larson et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4617238 | Crivello et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4687707 | Matsuo et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4722878 | Watakabe et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4731155 | Napoli et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4808511 | Holmes | Feb 1989 | A |
4826943 | Ito et al. | May 1989 | A |
4931351 | McColgin et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4959252 | Bonnebat et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4988274 | Kenmochi | Jan 1991 | A |
5028366 | Harakal et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5028511 | Choi | Jul 1991 | A |
5108875 | Thackeray et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5110514 | Soane | May 1992 | A |
5169494 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170182 | Olson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170192 | Pettigrew et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5180757 | Lucey | Jan 1993 | A |
5204381 | Zeigler | Apr 1993 | A |
5206983 | Guckel et al. | May 1993 | A |
5234793 | Sebald et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240550 | Boehnke et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5242711 | DeNatale et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5259926 | Kuwabara et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5298556 | Stephens | Mar 1994 | A |
5302627 | Field et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314731 | Yoneda et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318870 | Hartney | Jun 1994 | A |
5331020 | Brown et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5369722 | Heming et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5389696 | Dempsey et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5395954 | Soria et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417802 | Obeng | May 1995 | A |
5425848 | Haisma et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5439766 | Day et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5459198 | Sharp | Oct 1995 | A |
5462700 | Beeson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5480047 | Tanigawa et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5482768 | Kawasato et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512131 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523878 | Wallace et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527662 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5542978 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545367 | Bae et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5594042 | Glover et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601641 | Stephens | Feb 1997 | A |
5629095 | Bujanowski et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629128 | Shirakawa et al. | May 1997 | A |
5669303 | Maracas et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5723242 | Woo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725788 | Maracas et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5772905 | Chou | Jun 1998 | A |
5776748 | Singhvi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5820769 | Chou | Oct 1998 | A |
5837314 | Beaton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849209 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849222 | Jen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861467 | Bujanowski et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5888650 | Calhoun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5895263 | Carter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905104 | Eklund et al. | May 1999 | A |
5948470 | Harrison et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956216 | Chou | Sep 1999 | A |
6046056 | Parce et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063888 | Yamaguchi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066269 | Wei et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074827 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6114404 | Deeken et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117708 | Wensel | Sep 2000 | A |
6132632 | Haney et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6174931 | Moon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190929 | Wang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200736 | Tan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204343 | Barucha et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218316 | Marsh | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6261469 | Zakhidov et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274294 | Hines | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309580 | Chou | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316290 | Wensel | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326627 | Putvinski et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334960 | Willson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6335149 | Xu et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342097 | Terry et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344105 | Daugherty et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348999 | Summersgill et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355198 | Kim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6391217 | Schaffer et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6399406 | Chan et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6446933 | Westmoreland | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468642 | Bray et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468896 | Rohr et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475704 | Iwasaki et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482742 | Chou | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497961 | Kang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6503914 | Benish et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517977 | Resnick et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517995 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518168 | Clem et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518189 | Chou | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6541356 | Fogel et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6544594 | Linford et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6565776 | Li et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6580172 | Mancini et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583248 | Bowen | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600207 | Huang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605849 | Lutwak et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607173 | Westmoreland | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6646662 | Nebashi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6649272 | Moore et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664026 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664306 | Gaddam et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6696157 | David et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6696220 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6713238 | Chou et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721529 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737489 | Linert et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6774183 | Palumbo et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776094 | Whitesides et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790905 | Fitzgerald et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802870 | Chang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809356 | Chou | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6828244 | Chou | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830819 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842229 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849558 | Schaper | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871558 | Choi et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6900881 | Sreenivasan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908861 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916584 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6916585 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926929 | Watts et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932934 | Choi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936194 | Watts | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6980282 | Choi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6990870 | Choi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7019819 | Choi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7036389 | Choi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7037639 | Voisin | May 2006 | B2 |
7071088 | Watts et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077992 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7090716 | McMackin et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7122079 | Xu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122482 | Xu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7138362 | Abe et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141188 | Li et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7157036 | Choi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179079 | Sreenivasan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7244386 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252715 | Watts et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7270533 | McMackin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281919 | Shackleton et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298456 | Cherala et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316554 | Choi et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338275 | Choi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360851 | Snyder | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7462028 | Cherala et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473090 | McMackin et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20010044075 | Nishimura et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020042027 | Chou et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020115002 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132482 | Chou | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020167117 | Chou | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177319 | Chou | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030034329 | Chou | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054115 | Albano et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062334 | Lee et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080471 | Chou | May 2003 | A1 |
20030080472 | Chou | May 2003 | A1 |
20030129542 | Shih et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030166814 | Sparrowe et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030235787 | Watts et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040036201 | Chou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046288 | Chou | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065252 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040065976 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040110856 | Young et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112862 | Willson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116548 | Willson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118809 | Chou et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131718 | Chou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137734 | Chou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156108 | Chou et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163563 | Sreenivasan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040170770 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192041 | Jeong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197843 | Chou et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202872 | Fang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040241338 | Foster et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040250945 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050037143 | Chou et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061773 | Choi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072757 | McMackin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084804 | Truskett et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050106321 | McMackin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113484 | Kamen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050118749 | Sakamoto et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156357 | Willson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050189676 | Sreenivasan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236739 | Willson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050270312 | Lad et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276919 | Truskett et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060035029 | Xu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036051 | Xu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060062867 | Choi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062922 | Xu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063112 | Sreenivasan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076717 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077374 | Sreenivasan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060081557 | Xu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108710 | Xu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115999 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121728 | McMackin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145398 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060175736 | Xu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177532 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177535 | McMackin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070017631 | Xu | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070063384 | Choi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070114686 | Choi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126150 | GanapathiSubramanian et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070132152 | Choi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070170617 | Choi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070228593 | Jones et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070228608 | Shackleton et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070228610 | Sreenivasan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080085465 | Xu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080141862 | Xu et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080153312 | Sreenivasan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080174046 | Choi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199816 | Choi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080303187 | Stacey et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61-40845 | Feb 1986 | JP |
1-196749 | Aug 1989 | JP |
02-24848 | Jan 1990 | JP |
02-92603 | Apr 1990 | JP |
02192045 | Jul 1990 | JP |
2-248480 | Oct 1990 | JP |
3-90345 | Apr 1991 | JP |
9-278490 | Oct 1997 | JP |
WO 8702935 | May 1987 | WO |
WO 9905724 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0021689 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0147003 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0207199 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 03010289 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03079416 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03099536 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070141271 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10948511 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11608374 | US |