The present invention relates to methods for controlling the quality of an industrial process, comprising the steps of:
Monitoring of the defects in industrial processes assumes increasing economic importance on account of its impact on the analysis of quality of industrial products. The possibility of obtaining an on-line and automatic assessment of the quality of an industrial process presents many advantages both from the economic point of view and from the standpoint of the speed of the process. Desirable characteristics of the system are hence:
Currently the problem of recognition of the quality of an industrial process, and consequently the identification of defects, is approached by an inspection carried out off line by skilled staff, or else using automatic methods, which, by means of sensors, identify only some of the defects listed above, in a way that is far from satisfactory and is moreover sensitive to the different settings of the machine.
There are known methods and systems for controlling the quality in industrial processes, for example applied to on-line monitoring of the laser-welding process, in particular in the case of welding of sheet metal. The control system is able to assess the presence of porosities in the welding area or else, in the case of butt-welded thin sheet metal, the presence of defects due to overlapping or poor jointing of the sheet metal.
The above used systems base quality control on a comparison between the signals detected during the process and one or more predetermined reference signals indicating a good-quality weld. Said reference signals, which usually range in number between two and ten, are arranged starting from a number of samples of good-quality welds. Obviously, said mode of procedure implies the presence of a skilled operator who is able to certify the goodness of the weld at the moment of creation of the reference signals, and involves expenditure in terms of time and sometimes also in terms of waste of material (used for making the samples necessary for obtaining the reference signals). In some cases there are also pre-arranged reference signals indicating a defective weld, this, however, involving additional problems and difficulties.
From the European patent application No. EP-A-1275464 filed in the name of the present applicant, it is known to split into blocks the signal acquired via photodiode, which collects the radiation emitted by a welding spot, calculating the mean of the signal in each block sampled and considering the blocks having a value smaller than or equal to the offset of the photodiode as indicating the presence of a defect. Said method eliminates the need for the reference signal; however, it enables only a very approximate detection of the defects.
The aim of the present invention is to overcome all the aforesaid drawbacks.
In order to achieve such aim, the object of the present invention is a method for controlling the quality of industrial processes which has the characteristics indicated at the beginning and is further characterized in that said method further comprises the operations of:
said comparison operation comprising:
In the preferred embodiment, said steps of obtaining a transformed signal from said reference signal and of obtaining a transformed signal from said real signal comprise a filtering operation by means of the application of a discrete wavelet transform (DWT), whilst said operation of comparing said energies of said transformed reference signal and said transformed real signal for obtaining corresponding time-frequency distributions comprises performing a calculation of the conjugate of the Fourier transform of the envelope of the real signal and of the envelope of the normalized signal, to obtain a real conjugated transformed signal and a reference conjugated transformed signal, respectively, as well as comparing the energies of the reference signal and of the real signal, extracting the frequency values for which the energy of the real signal is greater than that of the reference signal.
Of course, a further object of the invention is the system for controlling the quality of industrial processes that implements the method described above, as well as the corresponding computer product, directly loadable into the memory of a computer, such as a processor, and comprises software code portions for performing the method according to the invention when the product is run on a computer.
Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will emerge from the ensuing description, with reference to the annexed drawings, which are provided purely by way of non-limiting example and in which:
The method according to the invention will now be exemplified with reference to a laser-welding method. Said laser-welding method constitutes merely, however, just one non-limiting example of an industrial process to which the method for controlling the quality of industrial processes according to the invention can be applied.
With reference to
In a concrete embodiment, the half-reflecting mirror 6 used is a mirror made of ZnSe, with a diameter of 2 ins and a thickness of 5 mm. The sensor 7 is made up of a photodiode with a spectral response of between 190 nm and 1100 nm and an active area of 1.1×1.1 mm and a quartz window.
Once again in the case of a concrete embodiment, the acquisition card 12 is a data-acquisition card of the type PC card NI 6110E, with a maximum frequency of acquisition of 5 Msamples/s.
The anti-aliasing filter 11 carries out a filtering of the signal by means of a low-pass filter (for example a Butterworth IIR filter).
In the personal computer 9, according to the invention there is implemented a method for quality control, which is based upon a comparison of a real signal xreal, acquired via the photodiode 7 and a reference signal xref, representing a defective weld, stored in said personal computer 9.
The reference signal, designated by xref(t) is acquired at a frequency of acquisition fs, and hence, according to Nyquist's theorem, has associated to it a frequency band of the signal having the value of fs/2, whilst the number of samples acquired for the reference signal xref(t) is N.
In a first step 100, an operation of filtering of the reference signal xref(t) is performed by means of the application of a discrete wavelet transform (DWT). At output from the step 100 there is thus obtained a signal xref
Subsequently, a Hilbert-transform operation is applied to the signal xref
A normalization operation is applied to said analytical signal xref
On said normalized signal xref
Finally, in a step 105, an operation of calculation of the energy of the reference signal, designated by Eref, is performed by applying the relation:
∫|xref
As regards the real signal xreal(t), also this is acquired at a frequency of acquisition fs, and thus, according to Nyquist's theorem, has associated to it a frequency band of the signal having a value of fs/2, whilst the number of samples acquired for the real signal xreal(t) is N.
In particular, represented in
A fast-Fourier-transform operation is performed on said signal xreal
In a step 250, an operation of calculation of a mean frequency f0 is performed on the transformed normalized signal FFT
f0=∫f*FFT
In a step 251, an operation of calculation of a standard deviation B is performed, according to the relation:
B=(∫f2*FFT
In a step 252, there are then calculated a lower band F_Sn==(f0−B/2) and an upper band F_Dx=(f0+B/2).
In parallel, in a step 201, a Hilbert-transform operation is applied to the signal xreal
In a step 202, a normalization operation is applied to said analytical signal xreal
On said normalized signal xreal
Finally, in a step 205, an operation of calculation of an energy of the real signal Ereal is performed by applying the following relation:
∫|xreal
The operations of calculation of the energies Ereal and Eref are performed in a band delimited between the lower band F_Sn and the upper band F_Dx calculated in step 252. In greater detail, the calculation is performed on the band thus delimited, considering frequency steps, for example of one hertz, i.e.,
∫Fs|Xreal
∫Fs|Xref
In this way, the operation of calculation of the energies Eref and Ereal produces two respective vectors, namely a vector of energies of the reference signal Energy_Ref_step (1, . . . k), and a vector of energies of the real signal Energy_Real_step (1, . . . k), both comprising k frequency values.
Subsequently, a procedure of calculation of the quadratic time-frequency distributions is performed, illustrated in the flowchart of
This operation can be appreciated also with reference to the graph of
Finally, in order to obtain an estimate of the defects, in a step 307 each temporal value of the energy Etreal of the quadratic time-frequency distribution of the real signal Tfdreal is compared with the maximum value of the energy max_Tfdref.
If said value of energy of the quadratic time-frequency distribution of the real signal Tfdreal exceeds the maximum value of the energy max_Tfdref, this means that there is a defect on that time co-ordinate.
In this way, it is possible to locate the defects in time.
Of course, without prejudice to the principle of the invention, the details of construction and the embodiments may vary widely with respect to what is described and illustrated herein purely by way of example, without thereby departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
TO2004A0013 | Jan 2004 | IT | national |
This is a Divisional of application Ser. No. 11/033,498, filed on Jan. 12, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,728,254, which claims the benefit of priority from Italian Patent Application No. TO2004-A000013, filed on Jan. 13, 2004. The entire disclosures of the prior applications are considered part of the disclosure of the accompanying divisional application and are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3659974 | Neugroschl | May 1972 | A |
4813288 | Gamberini | Mar 1989 | A |
4877940 | Bangs et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
5121339 | Jenuwine et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5410406 | Webster | Apr 1995 | A |
5486677 | Maischner et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5517420 | Kinsman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5553614 | Chance | Sep 1996 | A |
5651903 | Shirk | Jul 1997 | A |
5659479 | Duley et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5698120 | Kurosawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5874708 | Kinsman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5986252 | Kawamura | Nov 1999 | A |
6181888 | Scheuer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6335504 | Ling et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6400741 | Matsunaga et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6549022 | Cole, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6661820 | Camilleri et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674044 | Bolognese et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6914215 | Davis et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7107118 | Orozco et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124063 | D'Angelo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7440870 | D'Angelo et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7640125 | D'Angelo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7702476 | D'Angelo et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20020144984 | Mori et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20090001262 | Visser et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19962967 | Jul 2001 | DE |
1238744 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1275464 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1371443 | Dec 2003 | EP |
40-9057476 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2003-053569 | Feb 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100228377 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11033498 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 12724724 | US |