1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention relate generally to medical devices and methods. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to the structure and deployment of a segmented stent at a luminal os at a branching point in the vasculature or elsewhere.
Maintaining the patency of body lumens is of interest in the treatment of a variety of diseases. Of particular interest to the present invention are the transluminal approaches to the treatment of body lumens. More particularly, the percutaneous treatment of atherosclerotic disease involving the coronary and peripheral arterial systems. Currently, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) often involve a combination of balloon dilation of a coronary stenosis (i.e. a narrowing or blockage of the artery) followed by the placement of an endovascular prosthesis commonly referred to as a stent.
A major limitation of PCI/stent procedures is restenosis, i.e., the re-narrowing of a blockage after successful intervention typically occurring in the initial three to six months post treatment. The recent introduction of drug eluting stents (DES) has dramatically reduced the incidence of restenosis in coronary vascular applications and offers promise in peripheral stents, venous grafts, arterial and prosthetic grafts, as well as A-V fistulae. In addition to vascular applications, stents are being employed in treatment of other body lumens including the gastrointestinal systems (esophagus, large and small intestines, biliary system and pancreatic ducts) and the genital-urinary system (ureter, urethra, fallopian tubes, vas deferens).
Treatment of lesions in and around branch points generally referred to as bifurcated vessels, is a developing area for stent applications, particularly, since 10% of all coronary lesions involve bifurcations. However, while quite successful in treating arterial blockages and other conditions, most stent designs are challenged when used at a bifurcation in the blood vessel or other body lumen. Presently, many different strategies are employed to treat bifurcation lesions with currently available stents all of which have major limitations.
One common approach is to place a conventional stent in the main or larger body lumen over the origin of the side branch. After removal of the stent delivery balloon, a second wire is introduced through a cell in the wall of the deployed stent and into the side branch. A balloon is then introduced into the side branch and inflated to enlarge the side-cell of the main vessel stent. This approach can work well when the side branch is relatively free of disease, although it is associated with increased rates of abrupt closure due to plaque shift as well as increased rates of late re-restenosis.
Another commonly employed strategy is the kissing balloon technique in which separate balloons are positioned in the main and side branch vessels and simultaneously inflated to deliver separate stents simultaneously. This technique is thought to prevent plaque shift.
Other two stent approaches including Culotte, T-Stent and Crush Stent techniques have been employed as well. When employing a T-stent approach, the operator deploys a stent in the side branch followed by placement of a main vessel stent. This approach is limited by anatomic variation (angle between main and side branch) and inaccuracy in stent positioning, which together can cause inadequate stent coverage of the sidebranch os. More recently, the Crush approach has been introduced in which the side-vessel stent is deployed across the os with portions in both the main and side branch vessels. The main vessel stent is then delivered across the origin of the side branch and deployed, which results in crushing a portion of the side branch stent against the wall of the main vessel. Following main-vessel stent deployment, it is difficult and frequently not possible to re-enter the side branch after crush stenting. Unproven long-term results coupled with concern regarding the inability to re-enter the side branch, malaposition of the stents against the arterial wall and the impact of three layers of stent (which may be drug eluting) opposed against the main vessel wall has limited the adoption of this approach.
These limitations have led to the development of stents specifically designed to treat bifurcated lesions. One approach employs a stent design with a side opening for the branch vessel which is mounted on a specialized delivery balloon. The specialized balloon delivery system accommodates wires for both the main and side branch vessels. The system is tracked over both wires which provides a mean to axially and radially align the stent/stent delivery system. The specialized main vessel stent is then deployed and the stent delivery system removed while maintaining wire position in both the main and side branch vessels. The side branch is then addressed using kissing balloon or by delivering and an additional stent to the side branch. Though this approach has many theoretic advantages, it is limited by difficulties in tracking the delivery system over two wires (Vardi et al, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,325,826 and 6,210,429).
Another approach, of particular interest to the present invention, includes the use of fronds, or fingers extending from the scaffolding of a side branch stent to facilitate positioning of the stent at a bifurcated lesion. This approach is described in detail in co-pending commonly assigned application Ser. No. 10/807,643 the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein.
However while above approach has significant promise, conventional stent delivery systems, such as balloon catheters, can have difficulty managing the fronds during delivery. In such conventional systems, the stent is usually crimped onto the balloon of the balloon catheter. While fine for many conventional stent designs, conventional balloons systems may not always prevent the fronds on a stent from separating from the balloon as the catheter is advanced through curved portions of the vasculature, such as those found in the circumflex coronary artery.
For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved systems and methods for delivering stents, particularly stents with fronds or other protruding anchoring elements at one end, to treat body lumens at or near the location of an os between a main body lumen and a side branch lumen, typically in the vasculature, and more particularly in the arterial vasculature. It would be further desirable if such systems and methods could treat the side branch vessels substantially completely in the region of the os and that the prostheses in the side branches be well-anchored at or near the os.
2. Description of the Related Art
Stent structures intended for treating bifurcated lesions are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,599,316; 6,596,020; 6,325,826; and 6,210,429. Other stents and prostheses of interest are described in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,994,071; 5,102,417; 5,342,387; 5,507,769; 5,575,817; 5,607,444; 5,609,627; 5,613,980; 5,669,924; 5,669,932; 5,720,735; 5,741,325; 5,749,825; 5,755,734; 5,755,735; 5,824,052; 5,827,320; 5,855,598; 5,860,998; 5,868,777; 5,893,887; 5,897,588; 5,906,640; 5,906,641; 5,967,971; 6,017,363; 6,033,434; 6,033,435; 6,048,361; 6,051,020; 6,056,775; 6,090,133; 6,096,073; 6,099,497; 6,099,560; 6,129,738; 6,165,195; 6,221,080; 6,221,098; 6,254,593; 6,258,116; 6,264,682; 6,346,089; 6,361,544; 6,383,213; 6,387,120; 6,409,750; 6,428,567; 6,436,104; 6,436,134; 6,440,165; 6,482,211; 6,508,836; 6,579,312; and 6,582,394.
Embodiments of the present invention provide improved delivery systems for the delivery and placement of stents or other prosthesis within a body lumen, particularly within a bifurcated body lumen and more particularly at an os opening from a main body lumen to a branch body lumen. The delivery systems will be principally useful in the vasculature, most typically the arterial vasculature, including the coronary, carotid and peripheral vasculature; vascular grafts including arterial, venous, and prosthetic grafts, and A-V fistulae. In addition to vascular applications, embodiments of the present invention can also be configured to be used in the treatment of other body lumens including those in the gastrointestinal systems (e.g., esophagus, large and small intestines, biliary system and pancreatic ducts) and the genital-urinary system (e.g., ureter, urethra, fallopian tubes, vas deferens), and the like.
The stent or other prostheses to be delivered will usually comprise a proximal portion which can include anchoring components which can include anchors, fronds, petals or other independently deflectable element extending axially from a main or scaffold section of the stent. These anchoring components can expandably conform to and at least partially circumscribe the wall of the main body vessel to selectively and stably position the prosthesis within the side branch lumen. Further description of exemplary anchoring components and prostheses is found in co-pending application Ser. No. 10/897,643, the full disclosure of which has previously been incorporated herein by reference. Various embodiments of the present invention provide means for capturing or otherwise radially constraining the anchoring components during advancement of the stent through the vasculature (or other body lumen) to a target site and then releasing the anchoring components.
In a first aspect of the invention, a prosthesis delivery system comprises a delivery catheter having an expandable member and a prosthesis carried over the expandable member. The prosthesis has a radially expandable scaffold and at least two fronds extending axially from an end of the scaffold. The system also includes means for capturing the fronds to prevent them from divaricating from the expandable member as the catheter is advanced through a patient's vasculature. Divarication as used herein means the separation or branching of the fronds away from the delivery catheter. Various embodiment of the capture means prevent divarication by constraining and/or imparting sufficient hoop strength to the fronds to prevent them from branching from the expandable member during catheter advancement in the vasculature.
In one embodiment, the capturing means comprises a portion of the expandable member that is folded over the fronds where the folds protrude through axial gaps between adjacent fronds. In another embodiment, the capturing means comprises a cuff that extends over at least a portion of the fronds to hold them during catheter advancement. The cuff can be positioned at the proximal end of the prosthesis and can be removed by expansion of the expandable member to either plastically deform the cuff, break the cuff, or reduce the cuff in length axially as the cuff expands circumferentially. The cuff is then withdrawn from the target vessel. In yet another embodiment, the capturing means can comprise a tether which ties together the fronds. The tether can be configured to be detached from the fronds prior to expansion of the expandable member. In alternative embodiments, the tether can be configured to break or release upon expansion of the expandable member so as to release the fronds.
In an exemplary deployment protocol using the prosthesis delivery system, the delivery catheter is advanced to position the prosthesis at a target location in a body lumen. During advancement, at least a portion of the fronds are radially constrained to prevent divarication of the fronds from the delivery catheter. When the target location is reached, the radial constraint is released and the prosthesis is deployed within the lumen.
In various embodiments, the release of the fronds and expansion of the prosthesis can occur simultaneously or alternatively, the radial constraint can be released prior to expanding/deploying the prosthesis. In embodiments where the radial constraint comprises balloon folds covering the fronds or a cuff or tether, the constraint can be released as the balloon is inflated. In alternative embodiments using a cuff or tether, the cuff/tether can be withdrawn from the fronds prior to expansion of the scaffold.
Embodiments of the above protocol can be used to deploy the prosthesis across the os of a branch body lumen into the main body lumen. In such applications, the prosthesis can be positioned so that the scaffold lies within the branch body and at least two fronds extend into the main body lumen. The fronds are then circumferentially deformed to circumscribe at least a portion of the main vessel wall and open a passage through the fronds. At least three fronds extend into the main body lumen.
Radiopaque or other medical imaging visible markers can be placed on the prostheses and/or delivery balloon at desired locations. In particular, it may be desirable to provide radiopaque markers at or near the location on the prosthesis where the scaffold is joined to the circumferential fronds. Such markers will allow a transition region of the prosthesis between the scaffold and the fronds to be properly located near the os prior to scaffold expansion. The radiopaque or other markers for location the transition region on the prosthesis can also be positioned on a balloon or other delivery catheter. Accordingly, in one embodiment of the deployment protocol, positioning the prosthesis can include aligning a visible marker on at least one of the prosthesis and a delivery balloon with the os.
In various embodiments for deploying the prosthesis, the scaffold is expanded with a balloon catheter expanded within the scaffold. In some instances, the scaffold and the circumferential fronds may be expanded and deformed using the same balloon, e.g., the balloon is first used to expand the anchor, partially withdrawn, and then advanced transversely through the circumferential fronds where it is expanded for a second time. Alternatively, separate balloon catheters may be employed for expanding the scaffold within the side branch and deforming the circumferential fronds within the main body lumen.
By “expandably circumscribe,” it is meant that the fronds will extend into the main body lumen after initial placement of the scaffold within the branch body lumen. The circumferential fronds will be adapted to then be partially or fully radially expanded, typically by expansion of a balloon or other expandable element therein, so that the fronds deform outwardly and engage the interior of the main lumen wall.
The circumferential fronds will usually extend axially within the main vessel lumen for some distance after complete deployment. Thus, the contact between the fronds and the main vessel wall will usually extend both circumferentially (typically covering an arc equal to one-half or more of the circumference) and axially.
Expansion of the circumferential fronds at least partially within the main body lumen provides a generally continuous coverage of the os from the side body lumen to the main body lumen. Further and/or complete expansion of the circumferential fronds within the main body lumen may press the fronds firmly against the main body lumen wall and open up the fronds so that they do not obstruct flow through the main body lumen.
Usually, the prosthesis will include at least three circumferential fronds extending axially from the end of the scaffold. The circumferential fronds will have an initial length (i.e., prior to radial expansion of the scaffold) which is at least 1.5 times the width of the scaffold prior to expansion, typically being at least 2 times the width, more typically being at least 5 times the width, and often being 7 times the width or greater. The lengths will typically be at least 2 mm, preferably being at least 3 mm, and more preferably being at least 6 mm, depending on the diameter of the scaffold and prosthesis. The circumferential fronds will usually have a width which is expandable to accommodate the expansion of the scaffold, and the fronds may be “hinged” at their point of connection to the scaffold to permit freedom to adapt to the geometry of the main vessel lumen as the prosthesis is expanded. It is also possible that the fronds could be attached to the single point to the scaffold, thus reducing the need for such expandability. The fronds may be congruent, i.e., have identical geometries and dimensions, or may have different geometries and/or dimensions. In particular, in some instances, it may be desirable to provide fronds having different lengths and/or different widths. Again further description of the fronds may be found in co-pending application Ser. No. 10/807,643.
Referring now to
Fronds 16, will usually extend axially from the scaffold section 12, as illustrated, but in some circumstances the fronds can be configured to extend helically, spirally, in a serpentine pattern, or other configurations. It is desirable, however, that the individual fronds be radially separable so that they can be independently folded, bent, and otherwise positioned within the main body lumen after the scaffold section 12 has been implanted within the branch body lumen. In the schematic embodiment of
In preferred embodiments, fronds 16 will be attached to the scaffold section 12 such that they can both bend and rotate relative to an axis A thereof, as shown in broken line in
Referring now to
It is desirable to have the fronds captured and held against the delivery catheter or otherwise restrained as the stent is advanced through the vasculature in order to prevent the fronds from divaricating or separating and branching from the scaffold section of the stent. Capture of the fronds and prevention of divarication can be achieved through a variety of means. For example, in various embodiments the capture means can be configured to prevent divarication by imparting sufficient hoop strength to the fronds, or a structure including the fronds, to prevent the fronds from separating and branching from the deployment balloon as the balloon catheter is advanced through the vascular including tortuous vasculature. In theses embodiments, the capture means are also configured to allow the fronds to have sufficient flexibility to be advanced through the vasculature as described above.
In an embodiment shown in
Once stent 210 is properly positioned at the target vessel site, balloon 241 is at least partially inflated which unfurls flaps 242 covering fronds 220 so as to release the fronds. Once released, deployment balloon 241 can also be used to expand or otherwise deform the fronds 220 to deploy them in the selected vessel as is described herein. Alternatively, a second balloon can be to used expand and deploy the fronds as is also described herein.
To avoid pinching the balloon material of balloon 241 between layers of stent metal during the stent crimping process in one embodiment, fronds 220 can be configured such that they do not overlap when crimped down to a smaller diameter. This can be achieved by configuring the fronds to be sufficiently narrow so that crimping the stent to a smaller diameter does not cause them to overlap, or through the use of a crimping fixture or mandrel known in the art. In various embodiments, fronds 220 can be configured to have a selectable minimum split width 230w between splits 230 after crimping. This can be in the range of about 0.001 to about 0.2 inches with specific embodiments of 0.002, 0.005, 0.010, 0.025, 0.050 and 0.1 inches.
In another embodiment for using the delivery balloon catheter to capture the fronds, a section of the balloon 241 (not shown) can be configured to evert or fold back over a proximal portion of the stent and thus overly and capture the fronds. When the balloon is inflated, the overlying section of balloon material unfolds, releasing the fronds. The everted section of balloon can over all or any selected portion of the fronds. Eversion can be facilitated through the use of preformed folds described herein, in this case, the folds having a circumferential configuration. The folded section of balloon can be held in place by a friction fit or through the use of releasable low-strength heat bond or adhesive known in the art for bonding the balloon to the fronds. In one embodiment for positioning the everted section, the balloon is positioned inside the scaffold section of the stent and then partially inflated to have an end of the balloon protrude outside of the scaffold section, then the balloon is partially deflated and the everted section is rolled over the fronds and then the balloon is fully deflated to create a vacuum or shrink fit of the balloon onto the fronds.
In various embodiments, fronds 210 can also be captured by use of a cuff 250 extending from the proximal end 241p of delivery balloon 241 as is shown in
After stent 210 is positioned at the target tissue site, the cuff releases the fronds allowing the stent to be deployed using the delivery balloon as is described herein. After releasing the fronds, the cuff can then be withdrawn prior to or along with the removal of the balloon catheter. In most embodiments, the entire catheter assembly including cuff, balloon, and catheter shaft are withdrawn proximally to fully release the fronds.
Release of the fronds by the cuff can be achieved through a variety of means. In one embodiment, cuff 250 can be configured such the frond tips 220t, slip out from the cuff when the balloon is deployed. Alternatively, the cuff my scored or perforated such that it breaks at least partially open upon balloon deployment so that it releases fronds 220. Accordingly, in such embodiments, cuff 250 can have one or more scored or perforated sections 250p. In such embodiments, portions of cuff 250 can be configured to break open at a selectable inflation pressure or at a selectable expanded diameter.
In various embodiments, cuff 250 can be configured such that it plastically deforms when the balloon is inflated and substantially retains its “inflated shape” 250is and “inflated diameter” 250id after the balloon is deflated is shown in
Also the cuff can be configured such that it shortens axially as it is expanded by the deployment balloon or other expansion device. This can be accomplished by selecting the materials for cuff 250 such that cuff shrinks axially when it is stretched radially as is shown in
In another embodiment, all or a portion of the cuff can be configured to fold over or evert onto itself upon inflation of the balloon to produce an everted section 251 and so release the enveloped fronds as is shown in
In various embodiments, all or a portion of cuff 250 can be fabricated from, silicones, polyurethanes (e.g., PEPAX) and other medical elastomers known in the art; polyethylenes; fluoropolymers; polyolefin; as well as other medical polymers known in the art. Cuff 250 can also be made of heat shrink tubing known in the art such as polyolefin or PTFE heat shrink tubing. These materials can be selected to produce a desired amount of plastic deformation for a selected stress (e.g. hoop stress from the inflation of deployment balloon). In particular embodiments, all or a portion of the materials comprising cuff 250 can be selected to have an elastic limit lower than forces exerted by inflation of the deployment balloon (e.g., the force exerted by a 3 mm diameter balloon inflated to 10 atms). Combinations of materials may be employed such that different portions of the cuff (e.g., the proximal and distal sections or the inner and outer surfaces) have differing mechanical properties including, but not limited to, durometer, stiffness and coefficient of friction. For example, in one embodiment the distal portion of the cuff can high a higher durometer or stiffness than a proximal portion of the cuff. This can be achieved by constructing the proximal portion of the cuff from a first material (e.g., a first elastomer) and the distal portion out of a second material (e.g. a second elastomer). Embodiments of the cuff having a stiffer distal portion facilitate maintaining the fronds in a restrained state prior to deployment. In another embodiment, at least a portion of an interior surface of the cuff can include a lubricous material. Examples of suitable lubricious materials include fluoropolymers such as PTFE. In a related embodiment, a portion of the interior of the cuff, e.g., a distal portion, can be lined with a lubricous material such as a fluoropolymer. Use of lubricous materials on the interior of the cuff aids in the fronds sliding out from under the cuff during balloon expansion.
Referring now to
In various embodiments, the tether can be a filament, cord, ribbon, etc. which would simply extend around the fronds to capture them like a lasso. In one embodiment the tether can comprise a suture or suture-like material that is wrapped around the fronds. One or both ends of the suture tether can be attachable to the balloon catheter 241. In another embodiment, tether 260 can comprise a band or sleeve that fits over fronds 220 and then expands with expansion of balloon 241. In this and related embodiments Tether 260 can also be attached to balloon catheter 241. Also, tether 260 can be scored or perforated so that a portion of the tether shears or otherwise breaks upon balloon inflation, thereby releasing the fronds. Further, the tether 260 can contain a radio-opaque other medical image visible marker 260m to allow the physician to visualize the position of the tether on the fronds, and/or determine if the tether is constraining the fronds.
Referring now to
Referring now to
During advancement, the fronds are radially constrained by a constraining means 250c described herein (e.g., a cuff or tether) to prevent divarication of the fronds from the delivery catheter. When the target tissue location is reached at os O or other selected location, the constraining means 250c is released by the expansion of balloon 32 or other constraint release means described herein (alternatively, the constraining means can be released prior to balloon expansion). Balloon 32 is then further expanded to implant the scaffold region 10 within the branch vessel lumen BVL, as shown in
Various approaches can be used in order to fully open the fronds 16. In one embodiment, a second balloon catheter 130 can be introduced over a guidewire GW to position the balloon 132 within the petals, as shown in
In various embodiments for methods of the invention using delivery system 5, the physician can also make use of additional stent markers 22 and 24 positioned at the ends of stent 10. In one embodiment, one or more markers 22 are positioned at the ends of the fronds as is shown in
In another embodiment of a deployment protocol utilizing markers 22, the physician could determine the constraint state of the fronds (e.g. capture or un-captured), by looking at the position of the markers relative to balloon 30 and/or the distance between opposing fronds. In this way markers 22 can be used to allow the physician if the fronds were properly released from the constraining means prior to their deployment. In a related embodiment the physician could determine the degree of deployment of the fronds by looking at (e.g., eyeballing) the distance between markers 22 on opposing fronds using one or medical imaging methods known in the art (e.g., X-ray angiography). If one or more fronds are not deployed to their proper extent, the physician could deploy them further by repositioning (if necessary) and re-expanding balloon catheters 30 or 130.
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Also, elements or steps from one embodiment can be readily recombined with one or more elements or steps from other embodiments. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/965,230 filed on Oct. 13, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,717,953, the full disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4950227 | Savin et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958634 | Jang | Sep 1990 | A |
4994071 | MacGregor | Feb 1991 | A |
5071406 | Jang | Dec 1991 | A |
5074845 | Miraki et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5102417 | Palmaz | Apr 1992 | A |
5226889 | Sheiban | Jul 1993 | A |
5304132 | Jang | Apr 1994 | A |
5342387 | Summers | Aug 1994 | A |
5383892 | Cardon et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5395333 | Brill | Mar 1995 | A |
5415635 | Bagaoisan et al. | May 1995 | A |
5507769 | Marin et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522882 | Gaterud et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540712 | Kleshinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5575817 | Martin | Nov 1996 | A |
5593442 | Klein | Jan 1997 | A |
5607444 | Lam | Mar 1997 | A |
5609605 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609627 | Goicoechea et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613980 | Chauhan | Mar 1997 | A |
5628783 | Quiachon et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632762 | Myler | May 1997 | A |
5632772 | Alcime et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645560 | Crocker et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656036 | Palmaz | Aug 1997 | A |
5658251 | Ressemann et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662608 | Imran et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669924 | Shaknovich | Sep 1997 | A |
5669932 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5713917 | Leonhardt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718712 | Bonnal et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720724 | Ressemann et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720735 | Dorros | Feb 1998 | A |
5741325 | Chaikof et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749825 | Fischell et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749851 | Wang | May 1998 | A |
5749890 | Shaknovich | May 1998 | A |
5755734 | Richter et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755735 | Richter et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755771 | Penn et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755778 | Kleshinski | May 1998 | A |
5755781 | Jayaraman | May 1998 | A |
5788708 | Hegde et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810871 | Tuckey et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824052 | Khosravi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827320 | Richter et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5843116 | Crocker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855598 | Pinchuk | Jan 1999 | A |
5860998 | Robinson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868777 | Lam | Feb 1999 | A |
5868783 | Tower | Feb 1999 | A |
5891191 | Stinson | Apr 1999 | A |
5893887 | Jayaraman | Apr 1999 | A |
5897588 | Hull et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906640 | Penn et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906641 | Thompson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5922019 | Hankh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961546 | Robinson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964771 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967971 | Bolser | Oct 1999 | A |
5968089 | Krajicek | Oct 1999 | A |
5972017 | Berg et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976181 | Whelan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980532 | Wang | Nov 1999 | A |
6004347 | McNamara | Dec 1999 | A |
6017363 | Hojeibane | Jan 2000 | A |
6027486 | Crocker et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027517 | Crocker et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033434 | Borghi | Mar 2000 | A |
6033435 | Penn et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048361 | Von Oepen | Apr 2000 | A |
6051020 | Goicoechea et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053913 | Tu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053941 | Lindenburg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056775 | Borghi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6056776 | Lau et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066155 | Amann et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066168 | Lau et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068654 | Berg et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068655 | Seguin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077297 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090127 | Globerman | Jul 2000 | A |
6090133 | Richter et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096071 | Yadav | Aug 2000 | A |
6096073 | Webster et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099497 | Adams et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099560 | Penn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113607 | Lau et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120523 | Crocker et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129738 | Lashinski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156052 | Richter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159238 | Killion et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162243 | Gray et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165195 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168617 | Blaeser et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183509 | Dibie | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206910 | Berry et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210429 | Vardi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214036 | Letendre et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221080 | Power | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221096 | Aiba et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221098 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231543 | Hegde et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241738 | Dereume et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241744 | Imran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254593 | Wilson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258116 | Hojeibane | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261305 | Marotta et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261316 | Shaolian et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264682 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264686 | Rieu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267783 | Letendre et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270525 | Letendre et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280412 | Pederson, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287315 | Wijeratne et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287336 | Globerman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290728 | Phelps et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293964 | Yadav | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6325826 | Vardi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331186 | Wang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344052 | Greenan et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346089 | Dibie | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352551 | Wang | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361544 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383212 | Durcan et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6383213 | Wilson et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6387120 | Wilson et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6391032 | Blaeser et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6395008 | Ellis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402778 | Wang | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6409741 | Crocker et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409750 | Hyodoh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409755 | Vrba | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409757 | Trout, III et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428567 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6436104 | Hojeibane | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6436134 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440165 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451050 | Rudakov et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478814 | Wang et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482211 | Choi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482227 | Solovay | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485509 | Killion et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488700 | Klumb et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6508836 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517558 | Gittings et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524335 | Hartley et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540779 | Richter et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547813 | Stiger et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554856 | Doorly et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562061 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565597 | Fearnot et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572649 | Berry et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579312 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579314 | Lombardi et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582394 | Reiss et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589274 | Stiger et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596020 | Vardi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599316 | Vardi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607552 | Hanson | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6626934 | Blaeser et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6637107 | Yasuhara et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652580 | Chuter et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656215 | Yanez et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6656216 | Hossainy et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663665 | Shaolian et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663666 | Quiachon et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673104 | Barry | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6673106 | Mitelberg et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6673107 | Brandt et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6682557 | Quiachon et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6706062 | Vardi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726714 | DiCaprio et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740113 | Vrba | May 2004 | B2 |
6756094 | Wang | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764504 | Wang | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770092 | Richter | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790224 | Gerberding | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805697 | Helm et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6805702 | Chen et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6824553 | Samson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830575 | Stenzel et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6843802 | Villalobos et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6852116 | Leonhardt et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6872215 | Crocker et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6911038 | Mertens et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6926690 | Renati | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932837 | Amplatz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6986786 | Smith | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7481834 | Kaplan et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7578841 | Yadin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7717953 | Kaplan et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7731747 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758630 | Davis et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20010008976 | Wang | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010011188 | Berry et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010020181 | Layne | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010023356 | Raz et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010037137 | Vardi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041930 | Globerman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020058984 | Butaric et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058993 | Landau et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077692 | Besselink | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111619 | Keast et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116047 | Vardi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020151959 | Von Oepen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156516 | Vardi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165602 | Douglas et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169498 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173840 | Brucker et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183763 | Callol et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183780 | Wang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193862 | Mitelberg et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193868 | Mitelberg et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198559 | Mistry et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030083734 | Friedrich et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097171 | Elliott | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114912 | Sequin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125797 | Chobotov et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030125799 | Limon | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030199967 | Hartley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040015227 | Vardi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024441 | Bertolino et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054362 | Lopath et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054396 | Hartley et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073250 | Pederson, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093058 | Cottone et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106985 | Jang | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133261 | Bigus et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133268 | Davidson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138730 | Mitelberg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138737 | Davidson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143209 | Liu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158306 | Mitelberg et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040204754 | Kaplan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220655 | Swanson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249434 | Andreas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254627 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260378 | Goshgarian | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260383 | Stelter et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010278 | Vardi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015108 | Williams et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049678 | Cocks et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050154447 | Goshgarian | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159803 | Lad et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165469 | Hogendijk | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192656 | Eidenschink | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203563 | Pederson, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | A9 |
20050209674 | Kutscher et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228483 | Kaplan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234536 | Mitelberg et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251195 | Wang | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261722 | Crocker et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288769 | Globerman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025849 | Kaplan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060079952 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079956 | Eigler et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116748 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070203571 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213803 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213804 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070276460 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288082 | Williams | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015610 | Kaplan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015678 | Kaplan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039919 | Kaplan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080183269 | Kaplan et al. | Jul 2008 | A2 |
20080294240 | Casey | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090163988 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163999 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090326641 | Davis et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100211160 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222870 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110004291 | Davis et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110004292 | Davis et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0712 614 | May 1996 | EP |
0505686 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0540290 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0876 805 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 959 811 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1 325 715 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 325 716 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 325 717 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 362 564 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 433 441 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 512 381 | Mar 2005 | EP |
WO 9638101 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9717101 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9819629 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9824503 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 0015147 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0069367 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0247580 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 0249538 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 03039626 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2004026180 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004058100 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004089249 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004091428 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004103217 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080015678 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10965230 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 11781201 | US |