1. Field of the Invention.
The present invention relates generally to railway signaling and more particularly, to rail break or vehicle occupancy detection on railroad track. More specifically, the present invention is in the technical field of railroad signaling and train control, including positive train control (PTC), centralized traffic control (CTC), automatic block signaling (ABS), communications-based train control (CBTC) and cab signaling.
2. Background of the Invention.
Conventional railway wayside signaling systems employ the rails of the track for transmission of signals used to detect track occupancy, broken rail and/or open turnouts. Railroad track is physically divided into a plurality of electrically-distinct blocks, each block having a track circuit typically terminated by insulated joints and equipped with bi-directional track code transceivers. It should be understood that the term “code transceiver” should be broadly construed to include any type of track circuit signal transceiver or cab signal transmitter. The code transceivers typically send and receive low-frequency, pulse-modulated carrier signals through the track circuit, thereby communicating signal status to each other. The presence of a train in the block causes the rails to be shunted, interrupting this communication, while the presence of a broken rail in the track causes an open circuit, also interrupting this communication. Additionally, turnouts in the track may be wired such that when not aligned for the normal route, communications will be interrupted. This is commonly known as an open turnout.
A fundamental limitation of fixed-block track circuit systems is their inherent inability to detect a rail break that is located behind a moving train within the same block as the train. Since many rail breaks occur under a train, it would be highly desirable to have the ability to detect broken rail behind a train within the block it is occupying. This would allow immediate notification of a following train or other entity, such as a train dispatching system or back office server.
Another limitation of fixed-block track circuit systems is the inability to detect where within a block an occupancy exists. Therefore, the entire block must be assumed to be occupied from the perspective of the signaling system. This inability to distinguish a track occupancy from a rail break, and the inability to locate where the occupancy or break is within the block artificially limits maximum traffic density on the track and therefore fundamentally restricts how efficiently a given track can be utilized. It would be highly desirable to have a true “moving-block” or “virtual block” train control system, including the ability to detect rail breaks, open turnouts or occupied track behind a train's current position within the same block that the train occupies, enabling the full potential benefit of CBTC implementation.
The present invention at least partially overcomes these limitations by using equipment on the leading or trailing end (if so equipped) of a railway vehicle to detect conventional track code or cab signal code in the track, and thereby determine if the track ahead of or behind the vehicle, but still in the same block, is occupied or has a broken rail. Information regarding reception of these signals is then transmitted over a wireless RF link to following trains, possibly via one or more wayside systems or a central office system and correlated with train location information, giving a positive, fail-safe closed-loop indication of rail integrity and the extent of track vacancy. This information may be used in the generation of movement authorities or restrictions for trains as an integral part of a CBTC or PTC system, allowing a fail-safe implementation of a moving-block or virtual block train control system.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the wayside signal equipment is customized to provide additional pulsed codes assigned to a series of blocks to give a vital indication of which track a vehicle is occupying, thereby facilitating determination of vehicle location in a CBTC or PTC system.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the current present in the track circuit of each block is monitored at each wayside track code transceiver. By appropriately correlating, using an RF link, the current measurements with the pulsed carrier signals and the carrier signals received by the vehicle, it is possible to distinguish a track occupancy from a rail break ahead of or behind a vehicle. This information may form an integral part of a CBTC or PTC system.
This invention provides a method for detecting a rail break or track occupancy ahead of or behind a train in an occupied block of track. The present invention employs commonly-used wayside signaling AC track code equipment and/or cab signaling overlay equipment, in conjunction with an RF communications link, possibly a train location determination system, and may be used as an integral component of a communications-based train control (CBTC) or positive train control (PTC) system to facilitate moving-block or virtual block operation.
The present invention detects, in real time, rail breaks occurring ahead of (or behind, if a system is mounted on the rear of the train) a moving train within an occupied block, and relays this information, along with train location information, to wayside systems or to a CBTC or PTC system. This is a function not performed by current fixed-block wayside signal systems, in that currently-used fixed-block wayside signal systems do not provide an indication that track immediately behind a train within the same block is unoccupied and free of rail breaks so that a following train could occupy it, unrestricted up to the leading train.
Conventional fixed-block wayside signal systems use the track as a transmission line, transmitting and receiving pulsed codes indicating block or signal status. If equipped with a cab signal overlay system, codes are picked up by railway vehicles and used to convey signal status to the operator. The present invention receives track codes or cab signal codes on the vehicle using conventional pickup coils inductively coupled to the rails, and uses them as a positive indication of rail integrity. When codes are present on a track, they are detected, may be interpreted, and reception of the codes is communicated back, via an RF wireless link, to wayside equipment, office equipment, or equipment on a following train, which may be part of a CBTC or PTC system. Thus, an indication of rail integrity may be conveyed, directly or indirectly, to following trains, effectively extending signaling indications or movement authorities, or to relax a restriction, where appropriate. Indication of the presence of code behind a train, along with that train's location (e.g., from GPS) can be used by a CTC or PTC system to allow a following train to advance unrestricted to the leading train's end position.
Some embodiments of the present invention are fully compatible with existing traditional AC track circuit-based block signaling systems, particularly when implemented as an integral part of a CBTC or PTC system where train and traffic control functions are handled by radio communications rather than track circuits and wayside signals. Thus, in some embodiments, the present invention will allow existing traditional track-circuit based signaling infrastructure to be optimized for rail break detection rather than signaling. This could allow, for example, fewer and longer track circuits and/or improved rail break detection.
In other embodiments of the present invention, codes are placed on a separate carrier, or a continuous carrier of frequency not used by wayside signaling systems, cab signal systems or overlay systems. The present invention may be implemented as an overlay system capable of functioning simultaneously with track code and cab signal systems. In one such embodiment, the coded electrical signals may include unique identifying characteristics assigned to each track segment to enable the onboard receiving and processing unit to distinguish the track segments. For example, unique codes or carrier frequencies may be assigned to particular track segments in multiple track territory, giving a nearly continuous, positive indication of which track a vehicle is occupying and which direction it is travelling in, solving a persistent problem in CBTC or PTC systems which rely on GPS.
The present invention overcomes several fundamental limitations of conventional fixed-block track circuit broken rail detection, including the inherent minimum limit on train separation and track utilization efficiency. In railway terminology, this invention allows shorter headways.
These and other advantages, features, and objectives of the present invention will be more readily understood in view of the following detailed description and the drawings.
The present invention can be more readily understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Before describing in detail the system and method for detecting broken rail or occupied track from a moving locomotive, it should be observed that the present invention resides primarily in what is effectively a novel combination of conventional electronic circuits, electronic components, and signal processing/estimation algorithms, and not in the particular detailed configurations thereof. Accordingly, the structure, control, and arrangement of these conventional circuits, components, and algorithms have been illustrated in the drawings by readily understandable block diagrams which show only those specific details that are pertinent to the present invention, so as not to obscure the disclosure with structural details which will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the description herein. Thus, the block diagram illustrations of the figures do not necessarily represent the mechanical or structural arrangement of the exemplary system, but are primarily intended to illustrate the major structural components of the system in a convenient functional grouping, whereby the present invention may be more readily understood.
With reference now to
With continued reference to
With reference now to
For the purposes of this disclosure, the term “external station” should be broadly construed to include, but not be limited to any type of wayside system, base station or central office system, as well as a mobile communications system on another railway vehicle capable of communications with the onboard receiving and processing unit described above. Communications between the onboard receiving and processing unit on the railway vehicle and an external station can be accomplished via an RF communication link, or by means of electrical signals carried via the track and code transceiver to an external station. The present invention can also be implemented using a TCP/IP communications protocol between the onboard receiving and processing unit on a railway vehicle and an external station.
With reference now to
With reference now to
With reference now to
Referring now to
Referring now to the invention in greater detail, with reference now to
With reference to
With continued reference to
With reference to
In some embodiments, the wayside track code transceivers transmit a series of pulses or a continuous carrier into the track, such carrier being at a frequency unused by any existing wayside signaling or cab signal equipment, and the onboard system is equipped with frequency-selective filters to pass only that frequency, thereby giving a continuous indication of the absence of rail breaks or shunting track occupancies.
In some embodiments, the onboard computer queries, through a variety of possible means, existing cab signal equipment, to determine if a valid cab signal code had been received. If such is the case, the control computer then communicates this status, via an RF communications link, PTC, CBTC, or other means, to wayside equipment or a central office system, as reception of cab signal information is a valid means of verifying track integrity.
In some embodiments, analog means are used to detect the code signals in the coil.
In other embodiments, a Hall Effect or other similar magnetic-field or current-sensing receiving device may be used instead of the pickup coils.
In yet another embodiment, a flat coil of relatively large area, oriented directly over the track, or wound and oriented in such a way that its magnetic flux would cut through the circuit formed by the rails and leading axle, may be used to perform the receive function.
In some embodiments, the onboard computer or another processor, automatically applies capacitances across the pickup coils or otherwise tunes a resonant circuit formed partially by the coils, adjusting the resonant frequency to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.
In some embodiments, the onboard computer has the ability to trigger a train stop or indicate to the locomotive operator that the train is approaching the end of unoccupied and intact track.
In yet another embodiment, the control computer has the ability to communicate with, directly, or indirectly via a wayside system, CBTC, or PTC system, other railway vehicles in nearby blocks, warning them of upcoming occupied track, broken rail, or open turnouts detected behind the present vehicle.
In other embodiments, the wayside transceiver units are configured to send and receive unique codes on each track in multiple track territory. The onboard computer interprets the code and confirms the code to the PTC system, giving a positive, vital, and nearly continuous indication of which track the vehicle is currently occupying, and in which direction the train is travelling.
In some embodiments, a continuous carrier of unique frequency (not on a known harmonic frequency of commonly used carriers) is superimposed on existing track codes by the wayside transceivers from wayside units to train. Narrow-band filters are applied to the signal from the pickup coils, and such frequency is continuously monitored by the onboard computer. Absence of such frequency is sufficient indication of either a rail break, track occupancy, or both.
In some embodiments, a route database containing an index of track codes used on various track segments in various geographical areas is used by the control computer, in conjunction with GPS information or other train control position, location, wheel tachometer or other systems, to provide a record of expected track codes for various geographic locations, records of known dead spots, dark territory, places where excessive interference may be encountered (i.e., galvanic protection for pipelines, etc.). Alternatively, such information may be provided by, or downloaded from a CBTC or PTC system server.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with variations and modifications within the spirit and scope of these claims. The invention should not be limited by the embodiments described above, but by all embodiments and methods within the scope and spirit of the invention.
Further, while we have shown and described an embodiment in accordance with the present invention, it is to be understood that the same is not limited thereto but is susceptible to numerous changes and modifications as known to a person skilled in the art, and we therefore do not wish to be limited to the details shown and described herein but intend to cover all such changes and modifications as are obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art.
The above disclosure sets forth a number of embodiments of the present invention described in detail with respect to the accompanying drawings. Those skilled in this art will appreciate that various changes, modifications, other structural arrangements, and other embodiments could be practiced under the teachings of the present invention without departing from the scope of this invention as set forth in the following claims.
The present application is based on and claims priority to the Applicants' U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/660,076, entitled “Method For Detecting The Extent Of Clear, Intact Track Near A Railway Vehicle,” filed on Jun. 15, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2605390 | Judge | Jul 1952 | A |
3038066 | Barry | Jun 1962 | A |
3696243 | Risely | Oct 1972 | A |
3742150 | Sherman et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3808425 | Campbell et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3946972 | Grundy | Mar 1976 | A |
4389033 | Hardman | Jun 1983 | A |
4415134 | Wilson | Nov 1983 | A |
4728063 | Petit et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4886226 | Frielinghaus | Dec 1989 | A |
4932614 | Birkin | Jun 1990 | A |
4979392 | Guinon | Dec 1990 | A |
5263670 | Colbaugh et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5330134 | Ehrlich | Jul 1994 | A |
5331288 | Darrow | Jul 1994 | A |
5358202 | Tse et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5398894 | Pascoe | Mar 1995 | A |
5501416 | Capan | Mar 1996 | A |
5501417 | Capan | Mar 1996 | A |
5586736 | Mollet | Dec 1996 | A |
5622339 | Capan | Apr 1997 | A |
5628478 | McConnel et al. | May 1997 | A |
5680054 | Gauthier | Oct 1997 | A |
6102340 | Peek et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6527230 | Frick | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6655639 | Grappone | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6763290 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779761 | Holgate | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7226021 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7268565 | Anderson | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7295017 | Fries | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7823841 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7954770 | Tomlinson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8175764 | Kernwein | May 2012 | B2 |
8914171 | Noffsinger et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020113170 | Grappone | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030038216 | Holgate | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030052233 | Frick | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030112131 | McAllister | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050075765 | Oguma et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050076716 | Turner | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070132463 | Anderson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070145982 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080105791 | Karg | May 2008 | A1 |
20080142645 | Tomlinson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080272245 | Mollet et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296441 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20110309204 | Bohlmann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110315828 | Bohlmann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120123617 | Noffsinger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126065 | Smith et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130284859 | Polivka et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130317676 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140014782 | Grappone | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140046513 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140124628 | Tresanini et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125356 | Cooper et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129154 | Cooper et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140138493 | Noffsinger et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140207317 | Noffsinger et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150053827 | Noffsinger et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130334373 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61660076 | Jun 2012 | US |