Method for directing cellular migration patterns on a biological tissue

Abstract
A contoured biological tissue for a bioprostheses, such as a cardiac/vascular patch or a bioprosthetic heart valve, and methods of contouring the tissue, are described. A predetermined pattern is provided on the tissue, comprising a plurality of ridges or depressions that are configured to facilitate cellular migration in a first direction and discourage cellular migration in a second direction. The biological tissue can be used in connection with a bioprosthetic heart valve comprising a biological tissue leaflet structure coupled to a supporting frame.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a method of treating biological tissue and, more particularly, to a method for imparting topographical changes onto a surface of a bioprosthetic tissue to direct or control patterns of cellular migration and tissue formation on the tissue.


BACKGROUND

Biological tissue, such as animal pericardium (e.g., bovine, porcine), has come into common use in connection with medical devices and implantable bioprostheses, such as bioprosthetic heart valves and vascular patches. The use of biological tissue in implanted bioprostheses, however, is not without its complications. Once implanted in the body, the biological tissue may become calcified or may stimulate the formation of scar or other types of tissue, such as pannus. The biological tissue may also stimulate cells to migrate into and integrate the implanted biological tissue into the host body.


One of the more serious complications associated with the implantation of prosthetic heart valves incorporating biological tissue is obstructive valve failure caused by pannus formation. Pannus is a membrane of granulation tissue, rich in fibroblasts, that forms in response to healing. The body may produce pannus where the native valve has been removed and a prosthetic heart valve has been implanted.


In many cases, pannus growth does not encroach the valve orifice or chamber space, but occasionally the hanging edges can hit or obstruct a leaflet. When pannus overgrowth interferes with valve functioning, surgery is the only option to remove the pannus overgrowth. There is no reliable way of predicting whether a particular patient will be more or less susceptible to pannus overgrowth.


Pannus overgrowth is estimated to be the cause of obstructive heart valve failure in a significant number of cases. In the aortic position, pannus formation occurs mainly on the inflow or ventricular side, while in the mitral position, it occurs both on the atrial and ventricular sides. In order to prevent tissue ingrowth into the clearance of leaflets, prosthetic valves have been designed with longer housing cylinders with the goal of creating an ingrowth barrier. Such valve designs, however, are often impractical, infeasible or undesirable for minimally-invasive or percutaneously-deliverable heart valves, as an important design goal for such valves is to reduce the delivery profile as much as practically possible. Thus, the inclusion of additional features or structures which add to the material bulk of the valves is generally avoided.


What is therefore needed are bioprosthetic heart valves which control pannus formation or which reduce or eliminate the likelihood of pannus overgrowth that interferes with proper valve functioning.


BRIEF SUMMARY

A contoured biological tissue for a bioprostheses, such as a cardiac/vascular patch or a bioprosthetic heart valve, and methods of preparing the contoured tissue, are described herein. A predetermined pattern is provided on the tissue, comprising a plurality of ridges or depressions that are configured to facilitate cellular migration in a first direction and discourage cellular migration in a second direction. The biological tissue can be used in connection with a bioprosthetic heart valve comprising a biological tissue leaflet structure coupled to a supporting frame.


In one embodiment, a method for manufacturing a bioprosthetic heart valve is described. The method comprises contouring a portion of a biological tissue valve leaflet with a predetermined pattern. The predetermined pattern comprises a plurality of ridges or depressions oriented in the same or different directions. Adjacent ridges or depressions are at least 10 microns apart to prevent or at least impede the migration of fibroblasts transversely across the ridges or depressions. The contouring can be performed with a laser, preferably a femtosecond laser.


The biological tissue can be at least partially crosslinked, and/or at least partially dehydrated, such as with a glycerin-based treatment solution, before the contouring. The biological tissue can be treated with a capping agent after the crosslinking, after the contouring, or both.


The method can further comprise packaging the bioprosthetic heart valve in a package that does not contain a liquid storage solution in contact with the bioprosthetic heart valve.


In another embodiment, a contoured bioprosthetic heart valve is described. The contoured bioprosthetic heart valve comprises one or a plurality of leaflets formed from a biological tissue and a contoured pattern is provided on the leaflets. The contoured pattern comprises a plurality of ridges or depressions, the distance between adjacent ridges or depressions being at least 10 microns. The plurality of ridges or depressions can comprise a first set of parallel depressions or ridges, and can further comprise a second set of parallel ridges or grooves transversing the first set of parallel ridges or grooves at an angle.


The bioprosthetic heart valve can further comprise sutures coupling the one or more leaflets to a support structure or a skirt. The predetermined pattern can be disposed on the leaflets adjacent to at least a portion of the sutures. The one or plurality of heart valve leaflets can each comprise a straight free edge and an arcuate cusp edge and the contoured pattern is provided substantially along the arcuate cusp edge.


In a further embodiment, a contoured bioprosthetic heart valve for implantation within an arterial wall of a patient is described. The contoured bioprosthetic heart valve comprises a biological tissue leaflet structure coupled to a supporting frame. The biological tissue leaflet structure has a circumferential outer peripheral surface facing the arterial wall. A contoured pattern is provided around the circumferential outer peripheral surface. The contoured pattern comprises a plurality of ridges or depressions, spaced and/or sized to prevent or impede cellular migration across the ridges or depressions. The adjacent ridges or depressions are preferably at least 10 microns apart. The contoured pattern can be provided along an entire length of sutures coupling the biological tissue leaflet structure to the supporting frame.


In yet a further embodiment, a contoured bioprosthetic heart valve is described. The contoured bioprosthetic heart valve comprises one or a plurality of leaflets formed from a biological tissue. The leaflets each comprise a straight free edge and an arcuate cusp edge. A contoured pattern is provided on the leaflets. The contoured pattern comprises a plurality of ridges or depressions extending radially from the straight free edge to the arcuate cusp edge. Cellular migration is promoted along the ridges or depressions.


In still another embodiment, a method for treating a biological tissue is described. The method comprises providing a tissue having a planar surface, treating the tissue to reduce surface irregularities, and contouring the tissue surface with a predetermined pattern comprising one or a plurality of ridges or depressions. The ridges and depressions are provided to encourage cellular migration in a first direction and discourage cellular migration in a second direction.


The tissue can be reduced in thickness to a range of about 250-500 microns by compressing the tissue or by removing material from the tissue. The contouring can be performed by a laser, preferably a femtosecond laser. The tissue can be at least partially dried or dehydrated before the contouring, such as by using a glycerin-based treatment solution. The tissue can then be packaged in a package that does not contain a liquid storage solution in contact with the biological tissue.


Yet another embodiment comprises a biological tissue for implantation having a surface contoured with a predetermined pattern comprising at least one ridge or depression configured to encourage cellular migration in a first direction and discourage cellular migration in a second direction.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1A is a plan view of a bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet having a plurality of parallel grooves.



FIG. 1B is a plan view of a bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet having a plurality of parallel grooves disposed only along an area adjacent the cusp edge.



FIG. 2 is a plan view of a bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet having a grid pattern disposed along an area adjacent the cusp edge.



FIG. 3 is a plan view of a bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet having a radial pattern designed to encourage cellular migration on the leaflet surface.



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view along 4-4 of FIG. 1B showing the spacing and depth of the respective grooves.



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a representative embodiment of a prosthetic heart valve that can be made with a biological tissue; and



FIG. 6 is a bottom perspective view of a valve leaflet structure connected to a reinforcing skirt so as to form a leaflet assembly.





Like numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views of the drawings.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Specific, non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the drawings. It should be understood that such embodiments are by way of example only and merely illustrative of but a small number of embodiments within the scope of the present invention. Various changes and modifications obvious to one skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and contemplation of the present invention as further defined in the appended claims.


Described herein are methods for contouring a biological tissue with a predetermined pattern which are aimed at directing cellular migration in a predetermined pattern across a surface of a bioprosthetic implant. Such implants include heart valve leaflets and patches made of a biological tissue, such as a bovine, equine or porcine pericardium. In a preferred embodiment, the biological tissue is treated such that the tissue is thinned (by compression or by removal of tissue material) and/or the tissue surface is smoothed (by compression and/or crosslinking), as described in U.S. Pub. No. 2011/0238167, published Sep. 29, 2011, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,141,064, issued Nov. 28, 2006, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. In a preferred embodiment, the biological tissue is thinned to a thickness of about 100-800 microns, preferably about 250-500 microns and most preferably about 100-300 microns.



FIGS. 1A-1B depict a bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet 100A having a plurality of parallel grooves 120. The leaflet 100A is depicted herein as comprising an arcuate cusp edge 104, a generally straight free edge 102 opposite the cusp edge 104, and a pair of oppositely-directed tabs 106 at either end of the free edge 102. A plurality of depressions, e.g., grooves, or raised ridges 120 is provided on one side of the leaflet surface and is patterned to follow the shape of the arcuate cusp edge 104. As shown in FIG. 1A, the parallel grooves 120 can be provided on substantially the entire surface of the leaflet 100A or, as shown in FIG. 1B, the parallel grooves can be provided only along the area adjacent the cusp edge 104 of the leaflet 100B. The patterns of parallel grooves 120 depicted in FIGS. 1A-1B are provided to discourage cellular migration in a transverse direction originating from the periphery or central region of the leaflet towards the central region or periphery of the leaflet, respectively.


As used herein, “parallel” refers to two paths that are substantially identical but are offset so as to never intersect. Accordingly, “parallel” is broadly understood to encompass lines, curves and wavy lines that follow the same path but are offset from one another by a constant or variable distance. In a preferred embodiment, adjacent paths are offset by a constant distance.


As used herein, “transversely” refers to a path that intersects the contoured pattern, e.g., grooves or ridges, and is not limited to a particular angle at which the path intersects the contoured pattern.


Certain cells, such as fibroblasts, are believed to have a significant role in the formation and overgrowth of pannus on bioprosthetic heart valves. Fibroblasts are a class of cells that synthesize the extracellular matrix and collagen, the structural framework for animal tissues. Fibroblasts play a critical role in wound healing. Implantation of bioprosthetic heart valves at a valve annulus stimulates fibroblasts to migrate and form a pannus around the heart valve and, more specifically, in the areas surrounding the suture lines of a bioprosthetic heart valve. It is therefore believed that directing the migration of cells (e.g., fibroblasts) responsible for pannus formation will similarly help control the extent and location of pannus growth.



FIG. 5 depicts an embodiment of a bioprosthetic heart valve 50 as generally comprising a structural frame or stent 52, a flexible leaflet structure 54 supported by the frame 52 and a flexible skirt 56 secured to the outer surface of the leaflet structure 54. The valve 50 can be implanted in the annulus of the native aortic valve, but also can be adapted to be implanted in other native valves of the heart or in various other ducts or orifices of the body. Valve 50 has an inflow end 60 and an outflow end 62. Valve 50 and frame 52 are configured to be radially collapsible to a collapsed or crimped state for introduction into the body on a delivery catheter and radially expandable to an expanded state for implanting the valve at a desired location in the body, such as the native aortic valve.


Leaflet structure 54 desirably comprises three separate connected leaflets 70, which are individually depicted in FIGS. 1-3. The individual leaflets can be arranged together to coapt in a tricuspid arrangement, as best shown in FIGS. 5 and 6. The leaflets 70 attach to one another at their adjacent sides to form commissures 80 of the leaflet structure 54. The leaflets are made of biological tissue, preferably bovine or porcine pericardium, and have a thickness in the range of about 100 to about 800 microns. The curved cusp edge forms a single scallop in the leaflet structure 54 and when secured to two other leaflets 70 to form the leaflet structure 54, the curved cusp edges collectively form a scallop-shaped lower edge of the leaflet structure. A suture line 84 visible on the exterior of the skirt 56 tracks the scalloped shape of the leaflet structure 54. By forming the leaflets with this scalloped geometry, stresses on the leaflets are reduced, which in turn improves durability of the valve 50.


The skirt 56 can be formed, for example, of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or pericardium, preferably bovine pericardium, ribbon. The leaflet structure 54 attaches to the skirt via a thin PET reinforcing strip 88 or sleeve. The leaflet structure 54 is sandwiched between skirt 56 and the reinforcing strip 88. The suture 84, which secures the reinforcing strip and the leaflet structure 54 to skirt 56 can be any suitable suture, and desirably tracks the curvature of the bottom edge of the leaflet structure 54 as seen on the exterior of the skirt 56 in FIG. 5. The skirt 56 and leaflet structure 54 preferably reside inside the frame 52.


It is believed that pannus growth on bioprosthetic heart valves typically occurs along the suture lines. Thus, with reference to the valve 50 depicted in FIGS. 5 and 6, pannus growth would most likely originate along the suture line 84 which corresponds to the cusp edge 104 of the leaflets 100A and 100B in FIGS. 1A and 1B, typically along the outwardly facing external surface or the circumferential outer peripheral surface of the valve 50 that is in contact with the arterial wall or body lumen. Thus, disposing a plurality of grooves or ridges 120 in a pattern that follows the suture line 84 will discourage or reduce the extent to which pannus growth occurs in a transverse direction to the suture line 84 and reduce the extent to which pannus overgrowth will reach the inflow or outflow orifices or otherwise interfere with the coaptation of the leaflets.


In a preferred embodiment, adjacent grooves or ridges 120 are both dimensioned and offset at a distance that is greater than the average size of a fibroblast or other cell associated with pannus formation. FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view along 4-4 of FIG. 1B depicting the spacing B between adjacent grooves and the width A and depth C of each groove 120. Fibroblasts are believed to have a size in the range of 10 to 40 microns and more typically from 10 to 20 microns. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, adjacent grooves 120 are offset at a distance B of at least 10 microns, preferably at least 20 microns, more preferably at least 30 microns and most preferably at least 40 microns.


Similarly, one or both of the width A and depth C of the grooves 120 are dimensioned to be at least as large as, if not larger than, the average size of a fibroblast or other cell associated with pannus formation. In a preferred embodiment, one or both of the width A and depth C of each individual groove 120 is at least 10 microns, preferably at least 20 microns, more preferably at least 30 microns and most preferably at least 40 microns.


It is understood that where the leaflets are made from a biological tissue that has been compressed or thinned, that the depth C of the grooves 120 is selected so as to not compromise the strength of the tissue leaflets. In a preferred embodiment, the grooves 120 are provided on only the one side of the leaflet that faces the arterial or cardiac wall when the valve is implanted. The depth C of the grooves 120 preferably does not exceed 25%, preferably 10% and more preferably 5% and most preferably 2% of the average thickness of the leaflet. Thus, for example, for a biological tissue leaflet having a thickness of 250 microns, the depth C of the grooves preferably does not exceed 62.5 microns, preferably 25 microns, more preferably 12.5 microns, and most preferably 5 microns. In the event that a width of less than 5 microns is selected, it is understood that at least one of the other parameters, e.g., the distance B between grooves 120 or the width A of the grooves, is preferably selected to exceed the average cell size of at least 10 microns. The values for A, B and C are selected to sequester or trap the fibroblasts or cells within grooves and/or between adjacent grooves 120. In embodiments where ridges are provided instead of grooves, the consideration with respect to selecting the distance between ridges and height of individual ridges is analogous to the distance between grooves and the depth of the grooves.



FIG. 2 depicts a bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet 200 having a grid pattern 210 disposed along an area adjacent the cusp edge 204 opposite the free edge 202. Here, the grid pattern is provided by two sets of intersecting parallel grooves or ridges which define a plurality of square-shaped cells. In embodiments where grooves are employed, the same considerations as to the distance between adjacent grooves and the width and depth of the grooves as discussed in relation to FIGS. 1A and 1B apply. In embodiments where ridges are employed, however, it is the dimension of the individual cells formed by the intersecting ridges that are operative in preventing cellular migration. The two sets of intersecting parallel ridges need not be at right angles to one another so long as the individual cells themselves are sized or dimensioned to be larger than the average size of a fibroblast or other cell associated with pannus formation. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, the individual cells formed in the tissue have at least a width and a length of at least 10 microns, preferably at least 20 microns, more preferably at least 30 microns and most preferably at least 40 microns.


In certain instances, it is desirable to facilitate or encourage cellular growth across a biological tissue surface. In such instances, FIG. 3 depicts a bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet 300 in which radial grooves 310 are provided as originating from a point 312 on the free edge 302 of the leaflet and extending to the arcuate cusp edge 304. While not depicted in FIG. 3, the radial grooves 310 can also extend into the tab portions 306 in a similar manner. The radial grooves 310 function to direct the cellular migration along their length. Because cellular interaction is desired, the distance between adjacent grooves can be no larger than the average size of fibroblasts or other cells associated with pannus formation as measured from the cusp edge. Thus in a preferred embodiment, this distance is less than 40 microns, preferably less than 30 microns, more preferably less than 20 microns and most preferably less than 10 microns. Smaller distances between radial grooves 310 will permit migration transversely across the radial grooves 310.


While the contouring of the biological tissue has been described and depicted herein with respect to heart valve leaflets, it is understood that such contouring can be performed on any biological tissue that is intended for implantation in the body. For example, the contouring can be provided in connection with biological tissue patches which are used for repair in cardiac and vascular reconstruction, soft tissue deficiency repair, valve leaflet repair, carotid repair, closure of pericardial defects, and suture line reinforcement during general surgical procedures. The dimensions and the location of the contouring would depend upon the intended result: to stimulate cellular migration along a specified area of the tissue or to deter cellular migration and thus tissue formation in specified areas of the tissue. Thus, as explained above, a groove being dimensioned with one or both of a width and depth that is greater than the average diameter of a cell (e.g., 10, 20, 30, or 40 microns) would likely trap the cells, prevent cellular migration transversely across the groove and thus hinder the cells from forming a network necessary to create unwanted tissue formation outside of the groove. Similarly, a ridge can be configured to have a height that effectively prevents cellular migration across the ridge and thus accomplish the same result.


The contouring of the biological tissue valve leaflets to produce grooves or ridges is preferably performed by laser ablation. In one embodiment, the laser is a femtosecond laser. In another embodiment, the laser includes a dual axis scanning lens, 2× beam expansion, 1550 nm wavelength, 31.5 μJ pulse energy on target; 1.6 W average power, 50 Hz repetition rate, 650 fs pulse width (ref); 30 μm laser spot size, elliptical polarization, 112 mm focal length, 400 mm/s coarse milling speed (20 μm fill spacing in cross hatch pattern), and 800 mm/s fine milling speed (20 μm fill spacing in cross hatch pattern).


In a preferred embodiment, the laser is coupled to a guiding device. A substantial amount of technology has been developed for guiding lasers and ablating tissue with great precision. Corneal ablation has been widely practiced and excimer lasers have become common. Reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 4,840,175, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Recent work with mode locking lasers having very short pulse lengths in picosecond and femtosecond ranges with reduced heating is also suitable.


Milling machines for precisely guiding lasers are also available. Milling machines employing a laser having the above specifications as the operative tool found to be useful for conveniently processing pericardium membranes have a 2-axis scanning laser head, tissue holders to facilitate loading the work into the machine, an X-Y table to increase working area of the laser and an automatic tissue holder loading mechanism. Mechanisms as described can be employed to selectively ablate a mounted pericardium membrane to generate patterns of different distances and dimensions as described herein. Further description of such mechanisms can be found, for example, in U.S. Pub. No. 2011/0238167, published Sep. 29, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


The operation of the milling machine is automated according to input data defining the pattern and the coarseness of the ablation. Typically such machines are arranged to control the depth of the ablation based on the specific height of the surface being worked on. Thus in a preferred embodiment, the tissue is compressed or contoured to a substantially uniform thickness and height. Alternatively, a fixed reference can be used rather than the height of the tissue surface being cut.


Laser ablation to contour the tissue is understood to be advantaged if performed on a substantially dehydrated or dry tissue. This can be accomplished by first fixing the tissue with a glycerin-based treatment. The tissue can first be cross-linked using glutaraldehyde or other suitable fixative. The tissue can also be at least partially dehydrated or dried by other chemical or non-chemical means to permit storage of the contoured tissue in a non-fluid environment. Alternatively, the tissue can be at least partially dehydrated or dried prior to contouring. Methods of treating tissue to at least partially dehydrate or dry the tissue, as compared to its native state, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,992, issued Aug. 30, 2011 to Edwards Lifesciences, Corp. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,534,004, issued Mar. 18, 2003 to The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. The tissue can then be mechanically compressed, cut into leaflets and contoured via laser ablation.


One contemplated sequence for contouring the biological tissue includes first cross-linking the tissue (e.g., bovine or porcine pericardium) with a glutaraldehyde-buffered solution. Next, the tissue can be heat treated using a process such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,931,969 to Carpentier, issued Aug. 3, 1999, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. Subsequently, the thickness of the tissue can be reduced by compression or by removing tissue material by laser or mechanical means such as by using a dermatome. Finally, the tissue can be treated with a capping and/or reducing agent to mitigate later in vivo calcification, which can also include treating with a glycerol/ethanol solution, as is described for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,972,376, issued Jul. 5, 2011 to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The tissue can also be at least partially dehydrated or dried by other chemical or non-chemical means to permit storage of the contoured tissue in a non-fluid environment.


It should be understood that although cross-linking the tissue results in a somewhat easier to handle work piece, the contouring can occur prior to cross-linking as well. Likewise, bulk tissue sheet can be compressed and contoured first before or after fixing, or leaflets can first be cut from the bulk membrane which are then compressed and contoured before or after fixing. Cross-linking the collagenous matrix provides stability prior to implantation to retard degeneration. Further, the fixation process generally operates by blocking reactive molecules on the surface of and within the donor tissue, thereby rendering it substantially non-antigenic and suitable for implantation. Fixing bioprosthetic tissue typically involves contacting the tissue with a cross-linking agent, normally a solution. Exemplary fixing solutions for bioprosthetic tissue such as bovine or porcine pericardium include glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, other aldehydes, EDC, polyethylene glycol, etc. Other ways to fix tissue exist, including heating, irradiating, etc. The fixing step can help maintain the pericardium in a particular three-dimensional form if undertaken after the membrane is otherwise prepared.


For prosthetic heart valve leaflets, the contoured leaflets are attached to a surrounding heart valve support frame or other such components, and sterilized such as with ethylene oxide. After the tissue has been contoured via laser ablation, calcification nucleation sites (e.g., aldehydes and Schiff bases) can be exposed which creates a propensity for calcification. Repeating the treatment with a capping agent (e.g., ethanolamine) a reducing agent (e.g., sodium borohydride) and a collagen preserving agent (e.g. glycerol) caps the nucleation sites and preserves the collagen integrity following laser ablation. Furthermore, this process will also allow the tissue to be stored in a non-liquid (i.e., non-glutaraldehyde) environment. In other words, the process is especially suitable for dry storage of the tissue.


The invention described and claimed herein is not to be limited in scope by the specific preferred embodiments disclosed herein, as these embodiments are intended as illustrations of several aspects of the invention. Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A bioprosthetic heart valve comprising: a contoured biological tissue leaflet for implantation having a surface, an edge and a contoured pattern comprising a plurality of depressions on only one side of the leaflet, the contoured predetermined pattern being configured to encourage cellular migration in a first direction and discourage cellular migration in a second direction, wherein a distance between adjacent depressions of the plurality of depressions in the second direction is at least 40 microns and wherein the contoured biological tissue leaflet consists of a crosslinked biological tissue.
  • 2. The contoured bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, further comprising sutures coupling the leaflet to a support structure or a skirt, and wherein the plurality of depressions is adjacent to and parallel to at least a portion of the sutures.
  • 3. The contoured bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, wherein: the edge of the leaflet comprises a straight free edge and an arcuate cusp edge; and wherein the contoured pattern follows at least a portion of the arcuate cusp edge.
  • 4. The contoured bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, wherein: the edge of the leaflet comprises a cusp edge; and the contoured pattern comprises a first set of parallel depressions parallel to at least a portion of the cusp edge.
  • 5. The contoured bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, wherein the contoured pattern comprises a second set of parallel depressions transversing the first set of parallel depressions at an angle.
  • 6. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 1, wherein the distance between adjacent ones of the plurality of depressions and a depth of each one of the plurality of depressions are selected to be larger than an average size of a fibroblast.
  • 7. The bioprosthetic heart valve of claim 6, wherein the depth of each one of the plurality of depressions is at least 40 microns.
US Referenced Citations (248)
Number Name Date Kind
2393580 Weiskopf Jan 1946 A
4120649 Schechter Oct 1978 A
4323358 Lentz et al. Apr 1982 A
4350492 Wright et al. Sep 1982 A
4372743 Lane Feb 1983 A
4378224 Nimni et al. Mar 1983 A
4402697 Pollock et al. Sep 1983 A
4405327 Pollock Sep 1983 A
4481009 Nashef Nov 1984 A
4553974 Dewanjee Nov 1985 A
4624822 Arru et al. Nov 1986 A
4647283 Carpentier et al. Mar 1987 A
4648881 Carpentier et al. Mar 1987 A
4758151 Arru et al. Jul 1988 A
4770665 Nashef Sep 1988 A
4776853 Klement et al. Oct 1988 A
4786287 Nashef et al. Nov 1988 A
4838888 Nashef Jun 1989 A
4865871 Livesey et al. Sep 1989 A
4885005 Nashef et al. Dec 1989 A
4958008 Petite et al. Sep 1990 A
4976733 Girardot Dec 1990 A
5002566 Carpentier et al. Mar 1991 A
5051401 Sikes Sep 1991 A
5080670 Imamura et al. Jan 1992 A
5094661 Levy et al. Mar 1992 A
5104405 Nimni Apr 1992 A
5116564 Jansen et al. May 1992 A
5147514 Mechanic Sep 1992 A
5154007 Piunno et al. Oct 1992 A
5200399 Wettlaufer et al. Apr 1993 A
5215541 Nashef et al. Jun 1993 A
5279612 Eberhardt Jan 1994 A
5326372 Mhatre Jul 1994 A
5329846 Bonutti Jul 1994 A
5397353 Oliver et al. Mar 1995 A
5437287 Phillips et al. Aug 1995 A
5447536 Girardot et al. Sep 1995 A
5460962 Kemp Oct 1995 A
5476516 Seifter et al. Dec 1995 A
5509932 Keogh et al. Apr 1996 A
5558875 Wang Sep 1996 A
5595571 Jaffe et al. Jan 1997 A
5613982 Goldstein Mar 1997 A
5645587 Chanda et al. Jul 1997 A
5674298 Levy et al. Oct 1997 A
5697972 Kim et al. Dec 1997 A
5713953 Vallana et al. Feb 1998 A
5720777 Jaffe et al. Feb 1998 A
5720894 Neev et al. Feb 1998 A
5733339 Girardot et al. Mar 1998 A
5746775 Levy et al. May 1998 A
5766520 Bronshtein Jun 1998 A
5769780 Hata et al. Jun 1998 A
5782914 Schankereli Jul 1998 A
5782931 Yang et al. Jul 1998 A
5843180 Jaffe et al. Dec 1998 A
5843181 Jaffe et al. Dec 1998 A
5855620 Bishopric et al. Jan 1999 A
5861028 Angell Jan 1999 A
5862806 Cheung Jan 1999 A
5873812 Ciana et al. Feb 1999 A
5899936 Goldstein May 1999 A
5910170 Reimink Jun 1999 A
5911951 Girardot et al. Jun 1999 A
5919472 Trescony et al. Jul 1999 A
5921980 Kirn Jul 1999 A
5931969 Carpentier et al. Aug 1999 A
5935168 Yang et al. Aug 1999 A
5945319 Keogh Aug 1999 A
5977153 Camiener Nov 1999 A
5993844 Abraham et al. Nov 1999 A
6008292 Lee et al. Dec 1999 A
6017741 Keogh Jan 2000 A
6093530 McIlroy et al. Jul 2000 A
6106555 Yang Aug 2000 A
6117979 Hendriks et al. Sep 2000 A
6121041 Mirsch, II et al. Sep 2000 A
6132472 Bonutti Oct 2000 A
6132473 Williams et al. Oct 2000 A
6132986 Pathak et al. Oct 2000 A
6156030 Neev Dec 2000 A
6156531 Pathak et al. Dec 2000 A
6165215 Rottenberg et al. Dec 2000 A
6166184 Hendriks et al. Dec 2000 A
6171335 Wheatley Jan 2001 B1
6174331 Moe et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177514 Pathak et al. Jan 2001 B1
6190407 Ogle et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193749 Schroeder et al. Feb 2001 B1
6203755 Odland Mar 2001 B1
6206917 Williams et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210957 Carpentier et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214054 Cunanan et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214055 Simionescu et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231608 Stone May 2001 B1
6231614 Yang May 2001 B1
6251579 Moore et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254635 Schroeder et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267786 Stone Jul 2001 B1
6277555 Duran et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287338 Sarnowski et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293970 Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. Sep 2001 B1
6302909 Ogle et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312474 Francis et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322593 Pathak et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328762 Anderson et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334873 Lane et al. Jan 2002 B1
6352708 Duran et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364905 Simpson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375680 Carlyle Apr 2002 B1
6383732 Stone May 2002 B1
6391538 Vyavahare et al. May 2002 B1
6394096 Constantz May 2002 B1
6448076 Dennis et al. Sep 2002 B2
6468660 Ogle Oct 2002 B2
6471723 Ashworth et al. Oct 2002 B1
6479079 Pathak et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482199 Neev Nov 2002 B1
6506339 Girardot et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509145 Torrianni Jan 2003 B1
6534004 Chen et al. Mar 2003 B2
6547827 Carpentier et al. Apr 2003 B2
6561970 Carpentier et al. May 2003 B1
6569200 Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. May 2003 B2
6582464 Gabbay Jun 2003 B2
6589591 Mansouri et al. Jul 2003 B1
6605667 Badejo et al. Aug 2003 B1
6617142 Keogh et al. Sep 2003 B2
6630001 Duran et al. Oct 2003 B2
6652594 Francis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6653062 DePablo et al. Nov 2003 B1
6682559 Myers et al. Jan 2004 B2
6696074 Dai et al. Feb 2004 B2
6734018 Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. May 2004 B2
6753181 Atala Jun 2004 B2
6790229 Berreklouw Sep 2004 B1
6797000 Simpson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6872226 Cali et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878168 Carpentier et al. Apr 2005 B2
6908591 MacPhee et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911043 Myers et al. Jun 2005 B2
6919172 DePablo et al. Jul 2005 B2
7008763 Cheung Mar 2006 B2
7029434 Carpentier et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037333 Myers et al. May 2006 B2
7063726 Crouch et al. Jun 2006 B2
7078163 Torrianni Jul 2006 B2
7141064 Scott et al. Nov 2006 B2
7143769 Stoltz et al. Dec 2006 B2
7214344 Carpentier et al. May 2007 B2
7238200 Lee et al. Jul 2007 B2
7318998 Goldstein et al. Jan 2008 B2
7338757 Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. Mar 2008 B2
7354749 Fisher et al. Apr 2008 B2
7367969 Stoltz et al. May 2008 B2
RE40570 Carpentier et al. Nov 2008 E
7498565 Silberberg et al. Mar 2009 B2
7579381 Dove Aug 2009 B2
7594974 Cali et al. Sep 2009 B2
7648676 Mills et al. Jan 2010 B2
7682304 Heyninck-Jantz et al. Mar 2010 B2
7914569 Nguyen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7919112 Pathak et al. Apr 2011 B2
7972376 Dove et al. Jul 2011 B1
8007992 Tian et al. Aug 2011 B2
8043450 Cali et al. Oct 2011 B2
8075615 Eberhardt et al. Dec 2011 B2
8105375 Navia et al. Jan 2012 B2
8136218 Millwee et al. Mar 2012 B2
8308797 Paniagua et al. Nov 2012 B2
8361144 Fish et al. Jan 2013 B2
8377143 Hamby et al. Feb 2013 B2
8475827 Hamby et al. Jul 2013 B2
9107739 Lelkes Aug 2015 B2
20010000804 Goldstein et al. May 2001 A1
20010025196 Chinn et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010027344 Bonutti Oct 2001 A1
20010032024 Cunanan et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010039459 Stone Nov 2001 A1
20020001834 Keogh et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020051806 Mallapragada May 2002 A1
20020091441 Guzik Jul 2002 A1
20020111532 Pathak et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020173842 Buchanan Nov 2002 A1
20020183844 Fishman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030035843 Livesey et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030055496 Cai Mar 2003 A1
20030069635 Cartledge Apr 2003 A1
20030125805 Johnson et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135284 Crouch et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030167089 Lane Sep 2003 A1
20030212454 Scott et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040030381 Shu Feb 2004 A1
20040086543 Keogh et al. May 2004 A1
20040158320 Simionescu et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050010773 Lapstun et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050119736 Zilla et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136510 Hendriks et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050211680 Li et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060084957 Delfyett et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060085063 Shastri Apr 2006 A1
20060099326 Keogh et al. May 2006 A1
20060110370 Pathak et al. May 2006 A1
20060159641 Girardot et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060193885 Neethling et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060210960 Livesey et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060217804 Dove Sep 2006 A1
20060217805 Dove Sep 2006 A1
20060253192 Atala et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070050014 Johnson Mar 2007 A1
20070073392 Heyninck-Jantz et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070203576 Lee et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070233228 Eberhardt et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070254005 Pathak et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080302372 Davidson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319166 Shen Dec 2008 A1
20090041729 Wolfinbarger, Jr. et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090130162 Pathak et al. May 2009 A2
20090137999 Silberberg et al. May 2009 A1
20090188900 Cali et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090326524 Cali et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100036484 Hariton et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100047436 Beith Feb 2010 A1
20110015739 Cheung et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110029654 Takeda et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110092966 Guo et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110177150 Pathak et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110214398 Liburd et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238167 Dove et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110295363 Girard et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110300625 Paniagua et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110306124 Strasly et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311493 Dove et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120035720 Cali et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059487 Cunanan et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120067855 Guo et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120078356 Fish et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120095551 Navia et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120123557 Carpentier et al. May 2012 A1
20120185038 Fish et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120302467 Levkin et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120328905 Guo et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130122583 Neethling May 2013 A1
20130238088 Navia et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140288641 Levy et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140314992 Palmaz et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140370599 Strasly et al. Dec 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0169259 Jan 1986 EP
8401894 May 1984 WO
9511047 Apr 1995 WO
95034332 Dec 1995 WO
96013227 May 1996 WO
98007452 Feb 1998 WO
9832400 Jul 1998 WO
98043556 Oct 1998 WO
1998057604 Dec 1998 WO
00032252 Jun 2000 WO
2007016251 Feb 2007 WO
2011119754 Sep 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (26)
Entry
Isenberg, Brett C. et al. “A Thermoresponsive, Microtextured Substrate for Cell Sheet Engineering with Defined Structural Organization.” Biomaterials 29.17 (2008): 2565-2572. PMC.
Carpentier, A., et al., “Biological Factors Affecting Long-Term Results of Valvular Heterografts,” Forty-ninth Meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, San Francisco, CA, Mar. 31-Apr. 2, 1969.
Chanda, J., et al., “Heparin in Calcification Prevention of Porcine Pericardial Bioprostheses,” Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers, vol. 18, No. 16, ISSN: 0142-9612, Aug. 1, 1997.
Chvapil, M., et al., “Use of Chemically Purified and Cross-Linked Bovine Pericardium as a Ligament Substitute,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1383-1394, 1987, University of Arizona Health Science Center, Tucson, AZ.
Dahm, Manfred, et al., “Effects of Surface Seeding with Vital Cells on the Calcium Uptake of Biological Materials for Heart Valve Replacement,” J Heart Valve Dis, vol. 5, No. 2, Mar. 1996, 148-151.
Dalton, B.A., et al., “Modulation of epithlial tissue and cell migration by microgrooves,” Journal of biomedical materials research, 2011, vol. 56, pp. 195-207.
Fahner, P., et al., “Systematic Review of Preservation Methods and Clinical Outcome of Infrainguinal Vascular Allografts,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 518-524, 2006.
Fumoto, H., et al., “Performance of Bioprosthetic Valves After Glycerol Dehydration, Ethylene Oxide Sterilization, and Rehydration,” Innovations, vol. 6, No. 1, Jan./ Feb. 2011.
Grabenwoger, M. et al. “Decreased Tissue Reaction to Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Material after L-glutaimc acid Treatment. A Morphological Study.” J. Biomed Mater. Res. Sep. 1992;26(9):1231-40.
Grant, R.A., et al., “The Effects of Irradiation with High Energy Electrons on the Structure and Reactivity of Native and Cross-Linked Collagen Fibres,” J. Cell Sci. vol. 7, 99. 387-405, 1970.
Hauschka, P., et al., “Direct Identification of the Calcium-Binding Amino Acid, y-Carboxyglutamate, in Mineralized Tissue,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, vol. 72, No. 10, pp. 3925-3929, Oct. 1975.
Jayakrishnan, A., et al., “Glutaraldehyde as a Fixative in Bioprostheses and Drug Delivery Matrices,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, Issue 5, 1996, pp. 471-484.
Khora, Eugene, “Methods for the Treatment of Collagenous Tissues for Bioprostheses,” Biomaterials, vol. 18, Issue 2, Jan. 1997, pp. 95-105.
Liao, K., et al., “Mechanical Stress: An Independent Determinant of Early Bioprosthetic Calcification in Humans,” Ann. Throac. Surg 2008;86:491-495.
Neethling, W, et al. Enhanced Biostability and Biocompatibility of Decellularized Bovine Pericardium, Crosslinked with an Ultra-Low Concentration Monomeric Aldehyde and Treated with ADAPT®, J. Heart Valve Dis. 2008; 17:456-464.
Olde Damink, L.H.H., et al., “Influence of Ethylene Oxide Gas Treatment on the in vitro Degradation Behavior of dermal Sheep Collagen,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Resarch, vol. 29, pp. 149-155, 1995.
R Parker, et al. Storage of Heart Valve Allografts in Glycerol With Subsequent Antibiotic Sterilisation, Thorax, 1978, 638-645, vol. 33:5, British Thoracic Society, London, UK.
Saegeman, V., et al., “Short and long term bacterial inhibiting effect of high concentrations of glycerol used in the prevention of skin allografts,” Science Direct, Burns, No. 34, Mar. 2008.
Schmidt, C., et al., “Acellular Vascular Tissues: Natural Biomaterials for Tissue Repair and Tissue Engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, pp. 2215-2231, 2000.
Trantina-Yates AE, et al. “Detoxification of Top Enhanced, Diamine-Extended Glutaraldehyde Fixation Significantly Reduces Bioprosthetic Root Calcification in the Sheep Model,” J. Heart Valve Dis. Jan. 2003; 12 (1):93-100.
Uttayarat, P. et al., “Microtopography and flow modulate the direction of endothelial cell migration,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2008, vol. 294. pp. H1027-H1035.
Zilla, P., et al., “Carbodiimide Treatment Dramatically Potentiates the Anticalcific Effect of Alpha-Amino Oleic Acid on Glutaraldehyde-Fixed Aortic Wall Tissue,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Elsevier, vol. 79, No. 3, ISSN: 0003-4975; Mar. 1, 2005.
St. Jude Medical Scores with the FDA on Valves with Anti-Calcification Technology, Nov. 28, 2007, http://www.medgadget.com/2007/11/st_jude_medical_scores_with_the_fda_on_valves_with_anticalcification_technology.html.
Jamieson W.R. et al, St Jude Medical Epic Porcine Bioprosthesis: Results of the Regulatory Evaluation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg., Jan. 31, 2011, vol. 141, No. 6, pp. 1449-1454.
Jeon H. et al., “The Effect of Micronscale Anisotropic Cross Patterns on Fibroblast Migration”, Biomaterials, Mar. 2, 2010, vol. 31, No. 15, pp. 4286-4295.
Isenberg B.C. et al., “A Thermoresponsive, Microtextured Substrate for Cell Sheet Engineering with Defined Structural Organization”, Biomaterials, Jun. 1, 2009, vol. 29, No. 17, pp. 2565-2572.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150100118 A1 Apr 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61888080 Oct 2013 US