Method for fabricating multiple transistor devices on a substrate with varying threshold voltages

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9406567
  • Patent Number
    9,406,567
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 28, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 2, 2016
    7 years ago
Abstract
Fabrication of a first device on a substrate is performed by exposing a first device region, removing a portion of the substrate to create a trench in the first device region, forming a screen layer with a first dopant concentration in the trench on the substrate, and forming an epitaxial channel on the screen layer having a first thickness. On or more other devices are similarly formed on the substrate independent of each other with epitaxial channels of different thicknesses than the first thickness. Devices with screen layers having the same dopant concentration but with different epitaxial channel thicknesses have different threshold voltages. Thus, a wide variety of threshold voltage devices can be formed on the same substrate. Further threshold voltage setting can be achieved through variations in the dopant concentration of the screen layers.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates in general to semiconductor devices and manufacturing processes and more particularly to a method for fabricating multiple transistor devices on a substrate with varying threshold voltages.


BACKGROUND

Cost effective electronic manufacturing requires transistor structures and manufacturing processes that are reliable at nanometer scales, and that do not require expensive or unavailable tools or process control conditions. While it is difficult to balance the many variables that control transistor electrical performance, finding suitable transistor dopant structures and manufacturing technique that result in acceptable electrical characteristics such as charge carrier mobility and threshold voltage levels are a key aspect of such commercially useful transistors.


SUMMARY

From the foregoing, it may be appreciated by those of skill in the art that a need has arisen for a technique to fabricate improved transistor devices that on a substrate that provide various threshold voltage control options and improved operational performance. In accordance with the following disclosure, there is provided a method for fabricating multiple transistor devices on a substrate with varying threshold voltages that substantially eliminates or greatly reduces disadvantages and problems associated with conventional transistor device fabrication and design.


According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for fabricating multiple transistor devices on a substrate with varying threshold voltages includes forming a first device in a substrate having a screen layer with a first dopant concentration and an undoped epitaxial channel with a first thickness. A second device is formed in the substrate independent of the first device. The second device has a screen layer with a second dopant concentration and an undoped epitaxial channel with a second thickness where the second thickness is different than the first thickness such that the first and second devices have different threshold voltages. Other devices may be formed with varying epitaxial channel thicknesses and varying screen layer dopant concentrations to provide further threshold voltage options.


The present disclosure describes various technical advantages and features not present in conventional transistor fabrication and design. Embodiments of the present disclosure may enjoy some, all, or none of these advantages. Other technical advantages may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, description, and claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts, in which:



FIGS. 1A to 1E illustrate a fabrication process for multiple transistor devices on a substrate with varying threshold voltage options;



FIG. 2 illustrates a chart showing threshold voltage, Ion current, and Ioff current for various screen layer dopant concentrations and undoped epitaxial channel thicknesses.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIGS. 1A-1E show a process for manufacturing multiple transistor devices on a substrate 10 and some with varying threshold voltage settings. Devices with varying voltage threshold settings are generally categorized as Low Threshold Voltage (LVT), Super Low Threshold Voltage (SLVT), Standard Threshold Voltage (SVT), High Threshold Voltage (HVT), and Super High Threshold Voltage (SHVT).


In FIG. 1A, shallow trench isolation regions 12 are formed in substrate 10. Shallow trench isolation regions 12 are formed through use of any conventional fabrication techniques known in the industry. Shallow trench isolation regions 12 define device regions where separate devices are to be formed.


In FIG. 1B, formation of a transistor device begins by placing a photoresist layer 14 over substrate 10 to expose a first device region 100. At first device region 100, a first predetermined thickness of substrate is etched away or otherwise removed. Within the trench left by the removal process, a screen layer 20 is formed on the remaining substrate 10 preferably by way of ion implantation of dopants of the same type (n versus p) as the well, using implant dose and energy conditions selected to form a pre-defined thickness and concentration of dopants for screen layer 20. An undoped epitaxial layer 22 representing a channel for the transistor device is then formed on screen layer 20. By “undoped”, the inventors are referring to a preference to use an epitaxial growth process recipe selected to result in an intrinsic semiconductor. Undoped may refer to a degree of dopants inevitably formed in the semiconductor material, preferably in concentration of less than 1×1017 atoms per cm3, thereby enabling the semiconductor material to be formed in a substantially undoped state. The thickness preferences for the trench and epitaxial layer 22 are further discussed below. The thicknesses are selected to result in the targeted threshold voltage for the device. Generally, the thinner the epitaxial layer 22, the higher the threshold voltage. Therefore, the thinnest epitaxial layer 22 would be used for the SHVT devices, with a thicker epitaxial layer 22 used for HVT devices, a still thicker epitaxial layer 22 used for SVT devices, an even thicker epitaxial layer 22 used for LVT devices, and the thickest epitaxial layer 22 used for SLVT devices. The threshold voltage may be further controlled by way of the dose of the screen layer 20 implant, wherein the higher the dose of screen layer 20 results in a higher threshold voltage. Further tuning of the threshold voltage may be achieved by way of a controlled out-diffusion of material using thermal cycling of anneals, so that a limited diffusion upward of implanted dopants from screen layer 20 results in a further control of the resulting thickness of epitaxial layer 22 and therefore tuning of the threshold voltage. Though not shown, still another option to tune threshold voltage is by way of a separate threshold voltage control layer that may be formed on screen layer 20 prior to formation of epitaxial layer 22. Such separate threshold voltage control layer may preferably be achieved by out-diffusion using thermal cycling as set forth above, or by way of an additional implant step or steps after the screen layer 20 is formed, using the same dopant material or including an additional or different material. For instance, if the screen layer 20 is comprised of antimony of a concentration of 5×1019 atoms per cm3, the subsequent implant steps may result in a threshold voltage control layer above the screen layer 20 having a concentration of 1×1018 atoms per cm3, comprising antimony or a combination of antimony and arsenic. In other embodiments, a well region and, if desired, an anti-punch through region may be formed that lies below screen layer 20. Both the well region and anti-punch through region, if present, are doped using the same dopant type (n or p) as the screen layer 20 but having a concentration of at least to one order of magnitude less than the dopant concentration of screen layer 20.


For improved operation, screen layer 20 is preferably a highly uniform screen. In operation, a gate induced electric field and consequent depletion zone extends to the screening layer. Whether the channel above the screen is formed by an undoped blanket epitaxial layer that extends across multiple transistors or a selective epitaxial channel layer formed under each transistor, efforts are made to maintain the channel layer as undoped. Since there is minimal dopant presence in the channel, there is substantially no variation in dopant positioning or concentration in the channel, resulting in channels having high mobility and devices that are well matched. To further improve device matching, the screen layer 20 is preferably maintained as an atomically uniform layer that extends a selected distance from a gate dielectric.


The precise depth and thickness of the undoped epitaxial channel layer is preferably maintained over at least 80% of the gate dielectric area and depth and thickness may slightly increase or decrease along the edge of the gate dielectric due to well proximity or etch effects. Typically, adjacent transistors will have a gate dielectric to screen layer thickness that only varies within a one-half nanometer range, while more distant transistors on the same die will still have a channel layer thickness that varies within one nanometer. Additionally, the screen layer may have a dopant concentration between 1×1018 and 5×1020 atoms per cubic centimeter, and further may have a defined thickness of between five (5) and twenty (20) nanometers that preferably varies no more than three (3) nanometers. Maintaining a controlled thickness of screen layer 20 additionally helps to match leakage current and body bias related performance factors. Having a tight control of screen layer 20 positioning leads to a tight control of the depletion zone when the transistor gate is activated, which in turn enables better device matching than without a screen layer 20 and undoped epitaxial channel. For comparison, an epitaxial transistor device having a retrograde dopant profile that is conventionally formed using multiple implants has an irregular depletion zone. Similarly sized transistor devices with an atomically uniform screening layer 20 will have a uniform depletion zone set by screen layer 20 with minimal edge effects.


In FIG. 1C, similar processing steps may be performed to form additional transistor devices such as a second device region 200 and a third device region 300. Selective use of subsequent photoresist layers allow for separate exposure and formation of second device region 200 and third device region 300 as similarly achieved with first device region 100. The differences between first device region 100, second device region 200, and third device region 300 may lie in the thickness of the trench formed in each region and the resulting thickness of the undoped epitaxial layer formed therein. The difference in thickness of the undoped epitaxial layers provide devices with different threshold voltages. In this manner, devices with similar screen layers but different threshold voltages may be formed on a same wafer.


In FIG. 1D, a legacy device may also be formed in a fourth device region 400 through selective exposure and fabrication as performed with the device regions discussed above. Thus, a wafer may include devices with differing threshold voltages as well as devices of differing types. Thus, logic, analog, SRAM, and legacy devices may be fabricated on the same substrate. Gate, source, and drain regions may be formed at each device region using conventional techniques. Halo implants are not required for formation of each device.


In FIG. 1E, additional devices may be formed on the same wafer where threshold voltage differences are not only established through differing thicknesses in the respective undoped epitaxial layers but also through differences in dopant concentrations in the screen layers of the devices. For example, device regions 500 and 600 have screen layers with different dopant concentrations and undoped epitaxial layers with the same thickness. Device regions 700 and 800 have different dopant concentrations in the respective screen layers and different undoped epitaxial layer thicknesses. Device regions 500 and 700 have the same dopant concentrations in the respective screen layers and different undoped epitaxial layer thicknesses. Device regions 600 and 800 have the same dopant concentrations in the respective screen layers and different undoped epitaxial layer thicknesses. Thus, multiple devices may be fabricated in a substrate with various combinations of screen layer dopant concentrations and undoped epitaxial layer thicknesses. For those device regions where the undoped epitaxial layer is of the same thickness, formation of the undoped epitaxial layer in each region may be formed individually as discussed above or simultaneously through group exposure by selective photoresist placement.



FIG. 2 shows an example of a range of devices possible on a single wafer. By varying the dopant concentration of the screen layer and the thickness of the undoped epitaxial layer, varying threshold voltages and Ion/Ioff currents can be achieved. As shown, increases in the dopant concentration in the screen layer provides increases in the threshold voltage of the device. Increases in the thickness of the undoped epitaxial layer provides decreases in the threshold voltage of the device. Thus, the threshold voltage of any device on the wafer can be fine tuned during fabrication through appropriate selection of screen layer dopant concentration and undoped epitaxial layer thickness.


Formation of the screen layer may be performed in different ways in the technique provided above. The screen layers may be formed through ion implantation into the substrate or a well region, through in-situ deposition or growth of doped material, or through intrinsic silicon epitaxial growth followed by ion implantation. The undoped epitaxial layers may be formed through intrinsic silicon epitaxial growth.


Differing types of transistor devices may be formed on substrate 10. For example, both NMOS and PMOS transistor devices may be fabricated on substrate 10. Materials used for the screen layers for the NMOS transistor devices may include boron or other p-type material, with anti-diffusion additives if needed, such as carbon, and/or germanium. For the NMOS transistor devices, ion implantation to establish the screen layers using boron are preferably performed prior to epitaxial growth of the channel layer (and also prior to formation of a threshold voltage control layer where this process step is performed). If desired, a separate threshold voltage layer may be formed after formation of the screen layer by way of a dopant implant onto the screen layer a species of the same type (n or p) as the screen layer, using a dosage and energy selected to result in a threshold voltage layer having a dopant concentration of approximately an order of magnitude less than the concentration of the screen layer.


Thermal cycles in the fabrication process lead to diffusion of the screen layer materials. For proper transistor device operation, it is necessary to prevent screen layer materials from diffusing into the undoped epitaxial layer. The effect of diffusion can be avoided by performing certain annealing processes or performing more thermal cycles prior to epitaxial growth of the channel layer.


Implanted boron is widely known to have poor diffusion performance during device fabrication, especially in thermal cycles of 900° C. or more. To improve the diffusion performance of boron, carbon may be added to protect the implanted boron profiles and germanium may also be added through pre-amorphous implant and solid phase epitaxy for best overall performance. Boron diffusion performance can also be improved through growing fully substitutional boron films by epitaxy in-situ doping. Fully substitutional boron provides superior resistance to anneals as compared to traditional implanted boron. Fully substitutional boron may avoid the use of carbon, germanium, or other stopgaps to protect against downstream thermal processes. Improved transistor performance and reduced fabrication costs may also be achieved from the elimination of extra materials such as carbon and germanium.


Boron diffusion performance can also be improved by a high temperature anneal, for example a 1000° C. spike anneal, to activate the implanted boron. The spike anneal causes the implanted boron to move into substitutional sites. Special anneals can be performed after boron implantation to fully activate the boron prior to subsequent thermal processes that normally cause the poor boron profile diffusion. Subjecting the implanted boron to a laser anneal of 1250° C. or 1300° C. for 400 μsec provides full boron activation in order for the implanted boron to behave like an in-situ doped epitaxial boron film for resistance to diffusion.


Materials used for the screen layers for the PMOS transistor devices in each fabrication process may include arsenic, phosphorous, and/or antimony. When arsenic is used for the PMOS transistor screen, ion implantation of the arsenic is preferably performed prior to epitaxial growth of the channel layer (and also prior to epitaxial growth of any threshold voltage control layer where this process step is performed). To prevent diffusion of screen layer material, a material that has a lower diffusion characteristic may be used. For instance, antimony diffuses less than arsenic in the thermal cycles of the fabrication process. Though antimony has lower diffusion than arsenic, the screen doping profile is sharper with antimony as compared to arsenic at the same doping energy and dopant concentration. This sharper doping profile of antimony can cause higher leakage currents (Id-off) than would be achieved with arsenic as the screen implant for the same epitaxial channel layer thickness. Arsenic tends to provide a lower leakage current than antimony. Leakage current for antimony gets worse at higher implant energies. However, an improvement in leakage current may be achieved by adding arsenic into the antimony implant.


Although the present disclosure has been described in detail with reference to a particular embodiment, it should be understood that various other changes, substitutions, and alterations may be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, though not shown, a body tap to at least certain ones of the transistor devices may be formed in order to provide further control of threshold voltage. Although the present disclosure includes a description with reference to a specific ordering of processes, other process sequencing may be followed and other incidental process steps may be performed to achieve the end result discussed herein. Moreover, process steps shown in one set of figures may also be incorporated into another set of figures as desired.


Numerous other changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be ascertained by those skilled in the art and it is intended that the present disclosure encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Moreover, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited in any way by any statement in the specification that is not otherwise reflected in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for fabricating multiple transistor devices on a substrate with a plurality of threshold voltages, comprising: forming a first device in a substrate, the first device including a screen layer with a first dopant concentration, a threshold voltage layer with a second dopant concentration less than the first dopant concentration, and a substantially undoped epitaxial channel with a first thickness thereon, the screen layer, threshold voltage layer, and undoped epitaxial channel of the first device underlying a first gate;forming a second device in the substrate electrically isolated from the first device, the second device having a screen layer with a third dopant concentration, a threshold voltage layer with a fourth dopant concentration less than the third dopant concentration, and a substantially undoped epitaxial channel with a second thickness thereon, the screen layer, threshold voltage layer, and undoped epitaxial channel of the second device underlying a second gate, the second thickness being different than the first thickness such that the first and second devices have different threshold voltages;wherein a top surface of the substantially undoped epitaxial channel of the first device is substantially coplanar with a top surface of the substantially undoped epitaxial channel of the second device adjacent respective gates of the first and second devices.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: forming a third device in the substrate, the third device having a screen layer with a third dopant concentration and a substantially undoped epitaxial channel with a third thickness thereon, the third thickness being different than the first and second thicknesses.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the first, second, and third dopant concentrations are substantially the same.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, further comprising: forming a fourth device in the substrate, the fourth device having a screen layer with a fourth dopant concentration and a substantially undoped epitaxial channel with a fourth thickness thereon.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the third dopant concentration is different than the fourth dopant concentration and wherein the third thickness and the fourth thickness are substantially the same.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising: simultaneously forming the substantially undoped epitaxial channel of the third and fourth devices.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and third dopant concentrations are the same.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the screen layer of the first device and the screen layer of the second device have substantially the same thickness.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising: forming shallow trench isolation regions in the substrate, the shallow trench isolating regions defining electrically separate device regions for formation of the first and second devices.
  • 10. A method for fabricating multiple transistor devices on a substrate with a plurality of threshold voltages, comprising: forming a first device in a substrate, the first device including a screen layer with a first dopant concentration, a threshold voltage layer with a second dopant concentration less than the first dopant concentration, and a substantially undoped epitaxial channel with a first thickness thereon, the screen layer, threshold voltage layer, and undoped epitaxial channel of the first device underlying a first gate;forming a second device in the substrate electrically isolated from the first device, the second device having a screen layer with a third dopant concentration, a threshold voltage layer with a fourth dopant concentration less than the third dopant concentration, and a substantially undoped epitaxial channel with a second thickness thereon, the second thickness being different than the first thickness such that the first and second devices have different threshold voltages, the screen layer, threshold voltage layer, and undoped epitaxial channel of the second device underlying a second gate, wherein a top surface of the substantially undoped epitaxial channel of the first device is substantially coplanar with a top surface of the substantially undoped epitaxial channel of the second device adjacent respective gates of the first and second devices; andforming a third device in the substrate electrically isolated from the first device, the third device having a threshold voltage that is set using a method that does not include a screen layer.
  • 11. A method for fabricating multiple transistor devices on a substrate with a plurality of threshold voltages, comprising: forming a first device in a substrate, the first device including a screen layer with a first dopant concentration and a substantially undoped epitaxial channel with a first thickness thereon;forming a second device in the substrate electrically isolated from the first device, the second device having a screen layer with a first dopant concentration and a substantially undoped epitaxial channel with a second thickness thereon, the second thickness being different than the first thickness such that the first and second devices have different threshold voltages; andforming a third device in the substrate electrically isolated from the first device, the third device having a threshold voltage that is set using a method that does not include a substantially undoped epitaxial channel.
  • 12. The method of claim 9, wherein the forming shallow trench isolation regions in the substrate is done before forming the first device and forming the second device.
US Referenced Citations (502)
Number Name Date Kind
3958266 Athanas May 1976 A
4000504 Berger Dec 1976 A
4021835 Etoh et al. May 1977 A
4242691 Kotani et al. Dec 1980 A
4276095 Beilstein, Jr. et al. Jun 1981 A
4315781 Henderson Feb 1982 A
4518926 Swanson May 1985 A
4559091 Allen et al. Dec 1985 A
4578128 Mundt et al. Mar 1986 A
4617066 Vasudev Oct 1986 A
4662061 Malhi May 1987 A
4761384 Neppl et al. Aug 1988 A
4780748 Cunningham et al. Oct 1988 A
4819043 Yazawa et al. Apr 1989 A
4885477 Bird et al. Dec 1989 A
4908681 Nishida et al. Mar 1990 A
4945254 Robbins Jul 1990 A
4956311 Liou et al. Sep 1990 A
5034337 Mosher et al. Jul 1991 A
5144378 Hikosaka Sep 1992 A
5156989 Williams et al. Oct 1992 A
5156990 Mitchell Oct 1992 A
5166765 Lee et al. Nov 1992 A
5192701 Iwasaki Mar 1993 A
5208473 Komori et al. May 1993 A
5294821 Iwamatsu Mar 1994 A
5298763 Shen et al. Mar 1994 A
5369288 Usuki Nov 1994 A
5373186 Schubert et al. Dec 1994 A
5384476 Nishizawa et al. Jan 1995 A
5426328 Yilmaz et al. Jun 1995 A
5444008 Han et al. Aug 1995 A
5552332 Tseng et al. Sep 1996 A
5559368 Hu et al. Sep 1996 A
5608253 Liu et al. Mar 1997 A
5622880 Burr et al. Apr 1997 A
5624863 Helm et al. Apr 1997 A
5625568 Edwards et al. Apr 1997 A
5641980 Yamaguchi et al. Jun 1997 A
5663583 Matloubian et al. Sep 1997 A
5712501 Davies et al. Jan 1998 A
5719422 Burr et al. Feb 1998 A
5726488 Watanabe et al. Mar 1998 A
5726562 Mizuno Mar 1998 A
5731626 Eaglesham et al. Mar 1998 A
5736419 Naem Apr 1998 A
5753555 Hada May 1998 A
5754826 Gamal et al. May 1998 A
5756365 Kakumu May 1998 A
5763921 Okumura et al. Jun 1998 A
5780899 Hu et al. Jul 1998 A
5847419 Imai et al. Dec 1998 A
5856003 Chiu Jan 1999 A
5861334 Rho Jan 1999 A
5877049 Liu et al. Mar 1999 A
5885876 Dennen Mar 1999 A
5889315 Farrenkopf et al. Mar 1999 A
5895954 Yasumura et al. Apr 1999 A
5899714 Farremkopf et al. May 1999 A
5918129 Fulford, Jr. et al. Jun 1999 A
5923067 Voldman Jul 1999 A
5923987 Burr Jul 1999 A
5936868 Hall Aug 1999 A
5946214 Heavlin et al. Aug 1999 A
5985705 Seliskar Nov 1999 A
5989963 Luning et al. Nov 1999 A
6001695 Wu Dec 1999 A
6020227 Bulucea Feb 2000 A
6043139 Eaglesham et al. Mar 2000 A
6060345 Hause et al. May 2000 A
6060364 Maszara et al. May 2000 A
6066533 Yu May 2000 A
6072217 Burr Jun 2000 A
6087210 Sohn Jul 2000 A
6087691 Hamamoto Jul 2000 A
6088518 Hsu Jul 2000 A
6091286 Blauschild Jul 2000 A
6096611 Wu Aug 2000 A
6103562 Son et al. Aug 2000 A
6121153 Kikkawa Sep 2000 A
6147383 Kuroda Nov 2000 A
6153920 Gossmann et al. Nov 2000 A
6157073 Lehongres Dec 2000 A
6175582 Naito et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184112 Maszara et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190979 Radens et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194259 Nayak et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198139 Ishida Mar 2001 B1
6198157 Ishida et al. Mar 2001 B1
6218892 Soumyanath et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218895 De et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221724 Yu et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229188 Aoki et al. May 2001 B1
6232164 Tsai et al. May 2001 B1
6235597 Miles May 2001 B1
6245618 An et al. Jun 2001 B1
6268640 Park et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271070 Kotani et al. Aug 2001 B2
6271551 Schmitz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288429 Iwata et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297132 Zhang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300177 Sundaresan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313489 Letavic et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319799 Ouyang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320222 Forbes et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323525 Noguchi et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326666 Bernstein et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335233 Cho et al. Jan 2002 B1
6358806 Puchner Mar 2002 B1
6380013 Lee Apr 2002 B2
6380019 Yu et al. Apr 2002 B1
6391752 Colinge et al. May 2002 B1
6426260 Hshieh Jul 2002 B1
6426279 Huster et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432754 Assaderaghi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6444550 Hao et al. Sep 2002 B1
6444551 Ku et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449749 Stine Sep 2002 B1
6461920 Shirahata et al. Oct 2002 B1
6461928 Rodder Oct 2002 B2
6472278 Marshall et al. Oct 2002 B1
6482714 Hieda et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489224 Burr Dec 2002 B1
6492232 Tang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6500739 Wang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503801 Rouse et al. Jan 2003 B1
6503805 Wang et al. Jan 2003 B2
6506640 Ishida et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518623 Oda et al. Feb 2003 B1
6521470 Lin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6534373 Yu Mar 2003 B1
6541328 Whang et al. Apr 2003 B2
6541829 Nishinohara et al. Apr 2003 B2
6548842 Bulucea et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551885 Yu Apr 2003 B1
6552377 Yu Apr 2003 B1
6573129 Hoke et al. Jun 2003 B2
6576535 Drobny et al. Jun 2003 B2
6600200 Lustig et al. Jul 2003 B1
6620671 Wang et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624488 Kim Sep 2003 B1
6627473 Oikawa et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630710 Augusto Oct 2003 B1
6660605 Liu Dec 2003 B1
6662350 Fried et al. Dec 2003 B2
6667200 Sohn et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670260 Yu et al. Dec 2003 B1
6693333 Yu Feb 2004 B1
6730568 Sohn May 2004 B2
6737724 Hieda et al. May 2004 B2
6743291 Ang et al. Jun 2004 B2
6743684 Liu Jun 2004 B2
6751519 Satya et al. Jun 2004 B1
6753230 Sohn et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760900 Rategh et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770944 Nishinohara et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787424 Yu Sep 2004 B1
6797553 Adkisson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6797602 Kluth et al. Sep 2004 B1
6797994 Hoke et al. Sep 2004 B1
6808004 Kamm et al. Oct 2004 B2
6808994 Wang Oct 2004 B1
6813750 Usami et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821825 Todd et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821852 Rhodes Nov 2004 B2
6822297 Nandakumar et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831292 Currie et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835639 Rotondaro et al. Dec 2004 B2
6852602 Kanzawa et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852603 Chakravarthi et al. Feb 2005 B2
6881641 Wieczorek et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881987 Sohn Apr 2005 B2
6891439 Jaehne et al. May 2005 B2
6893947 Martinez et al. May 2005 B2
6900519 Cantell et al. May 2005 B2
6901564 Stine et al. May 2005 B2
6916698 Mocuta et al. Jul 2005 B2
6917237 Tschanz et al. Jul 2005 B1
6927463 Iwata et al. Aug 2005 B2
6928128 Sidiropoulos Aug 2005 B1
6930007 Bu et al. Aug 2005 B2
6930360 Yamauchi et al. Aug 2005 B2
6957163 Ando Oct 2005 B2
6963090 Passlack et al. Nov 2005 B2
6995397 Yamashita et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002214 Boyd et al. Feb 2006 B1
7008836 Algotsson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013359 Li Mar 2006 B1
7015546 Herr et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015741 Tschanz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7022559 Barnak et al. Apr 2006 B2
7036098 Eleyan et al. Apr 2006 B2
7038258 Liu et al. May 2006 B2
7039881 Regan May 2006 B2
7045456 Murto et al. May 2006 B2
7057216 Ouyang et al. Jun 2006 B2
7061058 Chakravarthi et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064039 Liu Jun 2006 B2
7064399 Babcock et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071103 Chan et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078325 Curello et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078776 Nishinohara et al. Jul 2006 B2
7089513 Bard et al. Aug 2006 B2
7089515 Hanafi et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091093 Noda et al. Aug 2006 B1
7105399 Dakshina-Murthy et al. Sep 2006 B1
7109099 Tan et al. Sep 2006 B2
7119381 Passlack Oct 2006 B2
7122411 Mouli Oct 2006 B2
7127687 Signore Oct 2006 B1
7132323 Haensch et al. Nov 2006 B2
7169675 Tan et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170120 Datta et al. Jan 2007 B2
7176137 Perng et al. Feb 2007 B2
7186598 Yamauchi et al. Mar 2007 B2
7189627 Wu et al. Mar 2007 B2
7199430 Babcock et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202517 Dixit et al. Apr 2007 B2
7208354 Bauer Apr 2007 B2
7211871 Cho May 2007 B2
7221021 Wu et al. May 2007 B2
7223646 Miyashita et al. May 2007 B2
7226833 White et al. Jun 2007 B2
7226843 Weber et al. Jun 2007 B2
7230680 Fujisawa et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235822 Li Jun 2007 B2
7256639 Koniaris et al. Aug 2007 B1
7259428 Inaba Aug 2007 B2
7260562 Czajkowski et al. Aug 2007 B2
7294877 Rueckes et al. Nov 2007 B2
7297994 Wieczorek et al. Nov 2007 B2
7301208 Handa et al. Nov 2007 B2
7304350 Misaki Dec 2007 B2
7307471 Gammie et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312500 Miyashita et al. Dec 2007 B2
7323754 Ema et al. Jan 2008 B2
7332439 Lindert et al. Feb 2008 B2
7348629 Chu et al. Mar 2008 B2
7354833 Liaw Apr 2008 B2
7380225 Joshi et al. May 2008 B2
7398497 Sato et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402207 Besser et al. Jul 2008 B1
7402872 Murthy et al. Jul 2008 B2
7416605 Zollner et al. Aug 2008 B2
7427788 Li et al. Sep 2008 B2
7442971 Wirbeleit et al. Oct 2008 B2
7449733 Inaba et al. Nov 2008 B2
7462908 Bol et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469164 Du-Nour Dec 2008 B2
7470593 Rouh et al. Dec 2008 B2
7485536 Jin et al. Feb 2009 B2
7487474 Ciplickas et al. Feb 2009 B2
7491988 Tolchinsky et al. Feb 2009 B2
7494861 Chu et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496862 Chang et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496867 Turner et al. Feb 2009 B2
7498637 Yamaoka et al. Mar 2009 B2
7501324 Babcock et al. Mar 2009 B2
7503020 Allen et al. Mar 2009 B2
7507999 Kusumoto et al. Mar 2009 B2
7514766 Yoshida Apr 2009 B2
7521323 Surdeanu et al. Apr 2009 B2
7531393 Doyle et al. May 2009 B2
7531836 Liu et al. May 2009 B2
7538364 Twynam May 2009 B2
7538412 Schulze et al. May 2009 B2
7562233 Sheng et al. Jul 2009 B1
7564105 Chi et al. Jul 2009 B2
7566600 Mouli Jul 2009 B2
7569456 Ko et al. Aug 2009 B2
7586322 Xu et al. Sep 2009 B1
7592241 Takao Sep 2009 B2
7595243 Bulucea et al. Sep 2009 B1
7598142 Ranade et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605041 Ema et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605060 Meunier-Beillard et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605429 Bernstein et al. Oct 2009 B2
7608496 Chu Oct 2009 B2
7615802 Elpelt et al. Nov 2009 B2
7622341 Chudzik et al. Nov 2009 B2
7638380 Pearce Dec 2009 B2
7642140 Bae et al. Jan 2010 B2
7644377 Saxe et al. Jan 2010 B1
7645665 Kubo et al. Jan 2010 B2
7651920 Siprak Jan 2010 B2
7655523 Babcock et al. Feb 2010 B2
7673273 Madurawe et al. Mar 2010 B2
7675126 Cho Mar 2010 B2
7675317 Perisetty Mar 2010 B2
7678638 Chu et al. Mar 2010 B2
7681628 Joshi et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682887 Dokumaci et al. Mar 2010 B2
7683442 Burr et al. Mar 2010 B1
7696000 Liu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7704822 Jeong Apr 2010 B2
7704844 Zhu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709828 Braithwaite et al. May 2010 B2
7723750 Zhu et al. May 2010 B2
7737472 Kondo et al. Jun 2010 B2
7741138 Cho Jun 2010 B2
7741200 Cho et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745270 Shah et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750374 Capasso et al. Jul 2010 B2
7750381 Hokazono et al. Jul 2010 B2
7750405 Nowak Jul 2010 B2
7750682 Bernstein et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755144 Li et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755146 Helm et al. Jul 2010 B2
7759206 Luo et al. Jul 2010 B2
7759714 Itoh et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761820 Berger et al. Jul 2010 B2
7795677 Bangsaruntip et al. Sep 2010 B2
7808045 Kawahara et al. Oct 2010 B2
7808410 Kim et al. Oct 2010 B2
7811873 Mochizuki Oct 2010 B2
7811881 Cheng et al. Oct 2010 B2
7818702 Mandelman et al. Oct 2010 B2
7821066 Lebby et al. Oct 2010 B2
7829402 Matocha et al. Nov 2010 B2
7831873 Trimberger et al. Nov 2010 B1
7846822 Seebauer et al. Dec 2010 B2
7855118 Hoentschel et al. Dec 2010 B2
7859013 Chen et al. Dec 2010 B2
7863163 Bauer Jan 2011 B2
7867835 Lee et al. Jan 2011 B2
7883977 Babcock et al. Feb 2011 B2
7888205 Herner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7888747 Hokazono Feb 2011 B2
7895546 Lahner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7897495 Ye et al. Mar 2011 B2
7906413 Cardone et al. Mar 2011 B2
7906813 Kato Mar 2011 B2
7910419 Fenouillet-Beranger et al. Mar 2011 B2
7919791 Flynn et al. Apr 2011 B2
7926018 Moroz et al. Apr 2011 B2
7935984 Nakano May 2011 B2
7941776 Majumder et al. May 2011 B2
7945800 Gomm et al. May 2011 B2
7948008 Liu et al. May 2011 B2
7952147 Ueno et al. May 2011 B2
7960232 King et al. Jun 2011 B2
7960238 Kohli et al. Jun 2011 B2
7968385 Jeong et al. Jun 2011 B2
7968411 Williford Jun 2011 B2
7968440 Seebauer Jun 2011 B2
7968459 Bedell et al. Jun 2011 B2
7989900 Haensch et al. Aug 2011 B2
7994573 Pan Aug 2011 B2
8004024 Furukawa et al. Aug 2011 B2
8012827 Yu et al. Sep 2011 B2
8029620 Kim et al. Oct 2011 B2
8039332 Bernard et al. Oct 2011 B2
8046598 Lee Oct 2011 B2
8048791 Hargrove et al. Nov 2011 B2
8048810 Tsai et al. Nov 2011 B2
8051340 Cranford, Jr. et al. Nov 2011 B2
8053340 Colombeau et al. Nov 2011 B2
8063466 Kurita Nov 2011 B2
8067279 Sadra et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067280 Wang et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067302 Li Nov 2011 B2
8076719 Zeng et al. Dec 2011 B2
8097529 Krull et al. Jan 2012 B2
8103983 Agarwal et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105891 Yeh et al. Jan 2012 B2
8106424 Schruefer Jan 2012 B2
8106481 Rao Jan 2012 B2
8110487 Griebenow et al. Feb 2012 B2
8114761 Mandrekar et al. Feb 2012 B2
8119482 Bhalla et al. Feb 2012 B2
8120069 Hynecek Feb 2012 B2
8129246 Babcock et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129797 Chen et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134159 Hokazono Mar 2012 B2
8143120 Kerr et al. Mar 2012 B2
8143124 Challa et al. Mar 2012 B2
8143678 Kim et al. Mar 2012 B2
8148774 Mori et al. Apr 2012 B2
8163619 Yang et al. Apr 2012 B2
8169002 Chang et al. May 2012 B2
8170857 Joshi et al. May 2012 B2
8173499 Chung et al. May 2012 B2
8173502 Yan et al. May 2012 B2
8176461 Trimberger May 2012 B1
8178430 Kim et al. May 2012 B2
8179530 Levy et al. May 2012 B2
8183096 Wirbeleit May 2012 B2
8183107 Mathur et al. May 2012 B2
8185865 Gupta et al. May 2012 B2
8187959 Pawlak et al. May 2012 B2
8188542 Yoo et al. May 2012 B2
8196545 Kurosawa Jun 2012 B2
8201122 Dewey, III et al. Jun 2012 B2
8214190 Joshi et al. Jul 2012 B2
8217423 Liu et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225255 Ouyang et al. Jul 2012 B2
8227307 Chen et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236661 Dennard et al. Aug 2012 B2
8239803 Kobayashi Aug 2012 B2
8247300 Babcock et al. Aug 2012 B2
8255843 Chen et al. Aug 2012 B2
8258026 Bulucea Sep 2012 B2
8266567 El Yahyaoui et al. Sep 2012 B2
8286180 Foo Oct 2012 B2
8288798 Passlack Oct 2012 B2
8299562 Li et al. Oct 2012 B2
8324059 Guo et al. Dec 2012 B2
8614128 Thompson et al. Dec 2013 B1
8637955 Wang et al. Jan 2014 B1
20010014495 Yu Aug 2001 A1
20020042184 Nandakumar et al. Apr 2002 A1
20030006415 Yokogawa et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030047763 Hieda et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030122203 Nishinohara et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030173626 Burr Sep 2003 A1
20030183856 Wieczorek et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215992 Sohn et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040075118 Heinemann et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075143 Bae et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040084731 Matsuda et al. May 2004 A1
20040087090 Grudowski et al. May 2004 A1
20040126947 Sohn Jul 2004 A1
20040175893 Vatus et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040180488 Lee Sep 2004 A1
20050023605 Amato Feb 2005 A1
20050106824 Alberto et al. May 2005 A1
20050116282 Pattanayak et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050250289 Babcock et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050280075 Ema et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060022270 Boyd et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060049464 Rao Mar 2006 A1
20060068555 Zhu et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068586 Pain Mar 2006 A1
20060071278 Takao Apr 2006 A1
20060154428 Dokumaci Jul 2006 A1
20060175657 Babcock et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060197158 Babcock et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060203581 Joshi et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060220114 Miyashita et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060223248 Venugopal et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070040222 Van Camp et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070117326 Tan et al. May 2007 A1
20070158790 Rao Jul 2007 A1
20070212861 Chidambarrao et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070238253 Tucker Oct 2007 A1
20080067589 Ito et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080108208 Arevalo et al. May 2008 A1
20080169493 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080169516 Chung Jul 2008 A1
20080197439 Goerlach et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080227250 Ranade et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080237661 Ranade et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080258198 Bojarczuk et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080272409 Sonkusale et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090057746 Sugll et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090108350 Cai et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090134468 Tsuchiya et al. May 2009 A1
20090224319 Kohli Sep 2009 A1
20090302388 Cai et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090309140 Khamankar et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311837 Kapoor Dec 2009 A1
20090321849 Miyamura et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100012988 Yang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100038724 Anderson et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100100856 Mittal Apr 2010 A1
20100148153 Hudait et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100149854 Vora Jun 2010 A1
20100187641 Zhu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100207182 Paschal Aug 2010 A1
20100270600 Inukai et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110059588 Kang Mar 2011 A1
20110073961 Dennard et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110074498 Thompson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110079860 Verhulst Apr 2011 A1
20110079861 Shifren et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110095811 Chi et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110147828 Murthy et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110169082 Zhu et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175170 Wang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180880 Chudzik et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110193164 Zhu Aug 2011 A1
20110212590 Wu et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230039 Mowry et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242921 Tran et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110248352 Shifren Oct 2011 A1
20110294278 Eguchi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110309447 Arghavani et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120021594 Gurtej et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120034745 Colombeau et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120056275 Cai et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120065920 Nagumo et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120080759 Ema et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120108050 Chen et al. May 2012 A1
20120132998 Kwon et al. May 2012 A1
20120138953 Cai et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120146155 Hoentschel et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120167025 Gillespie et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120187491 Zhu et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120190177 Kim et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120223363 Kronholz et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130280871 Hyun et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140103406 Wang et al. Apr 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
0274278 Jul 1988 EP
0312237 Apr 1989 EP
0531621 Mar 1993 EP
0683515 Nov 1995 EP
0889502 Jan 1999 EP
1450394 Aug 2004 EP
59193066 Nov 1984 JP
4186774 Jul 1992 JP
8153873 Jun 1996 JP
8288508 Nov 1996 JP
2003298060 Oct 2003 JP
2004087671 Mar 2004 JP
794094 Jan 2008 KR
WO2011062788 May 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (33)
Entry
Scholz, R et al., “Carbon-Induced Undersaturation of Silicon Self-Interstitials”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(2), pp. 200-202, Jan. 1998.
Banerjee, et al. “Compensating Non-Optical Effects using Electrically-Driven Optical Proximity Correction”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 7275 7275OE, 2009.
Cheng, et al. “Extremely Thin SOI (ETSOI) CMOS with Record Low Variability for Low Power System-on-Chip Applications”, Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 2009.
Cheng, et al. “Fully Depleted Extremely Thin SOI Technology Fabricated by a Novel Integration Scheme Feturing Implant-Free, Zero-Silicon-Loss, and Faceted Raised Source/Drain”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 212-213, 2009.
Drennan, et al. “Implications of Proximity Effects for Analog Design”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 169-176, Sep. 2006.
Hook, et al. “Lateral Ion Implant Straggle and Mask Proximity Effect”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 1946-1951, Sep. 2003.
Hori, et al., “A 0.1 μm CMOS with a Step Channel Profile Formed by Ultra High Vacuum CVD and In-Situ Doped Ions”, Proceedsing of the International Electron Devices Meeting, New York, IEEE, US, pp. 909-911, Dec. 5, 1993.
Matshuashi, et al. “High-Performance Double-Layer Epitaxial-Channel PMOSFET Compatible with a Single Gate CMOSFET”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 36-37, 1996.
Shao, et al., “Boron Diffusion in Silicon: The Anomalies and Control by Point Defect Engineering”, Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports, vol. 42, No. 3-4, pp. 65-114, Nov. 1, 2003, Nov. 2012.
Sheu, et al. “Modeling the Well-Edge Proximity Effect in Highly Scaled MOSFETs”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 11, pp. 2792-2798, Nov. 2006.
Ohguro, T et al., “An 0.18-μm CMOS for Mixed Digital and Analog Aplications with Zero-Volt-Vth Epitaxial-Channel MOSFETs”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1378-1383, Jul. 1999.
Pinacho, R et al., “Carbon in Silicon: Modeling of Diffusion and Clustering Mechanisms”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 1582-1588, Aug. 2002.
Robertson, LS et al., “The Effect of Impurities on Diffusion and Activation of Ion Implanted Boron in Silicon”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610, 2000.
Scholz, RF et al., “The Contribution of Vacancies to Carbon Out-Diffusion in Silicon”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 392-394, Jan. 1999.
Stolk, PA et al., “Physical Mechanisms of Transient Enhanced Dopant Diffusion in Ion-Implanted Silicon”, J. Appl. Phys. 81(9), pp. 6031-6050, May 1997.
Thompson, S et al., “MOS Scaling: Transistor Challenges for the 21st Century”, Intel Technology Journal Q3' 1998, pp. 1-19, 1998.
Wann, C. et al., “Channel Profile Optimization and Device Design for Low-Power High-Performance Dynamic-Threshold MOSFET”, IEDM 96, pp. 113-116, 1996.
Werner, P et al., “Carbon Diffusion in Silicon”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, No. 17, pp. 2465-2467, Oct. 1998.
Yan, Ran-Hong et al, “Scaling the Si MOSFET: From Bulk to SOI to Bulk”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 39, No. 7, Jul. 1992.
Komaragiri, R. et al., “Depletion-Free Poly Gate Electrode Architecture for Sub 100 Nanometer CMOS Devices with High-K Gate Dielectrics”, IEEE IEDM Tech Dig., San Francisco CA, 833-836, Dec. 13-15, 2004.
Samsudin, K et al., “Integrating Intrinsic Parameter Fluctuation Description into BSIMSOI to Forecast sub-15nm UTB SOI based 6T SRAM Operation”, Solid-State Electronics (50), pp. 86-93, 2006.
Wong, H et al., “Nanoscale CMOS”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vo. 87, No. 4, pp. 537-570, Apr. 1999.
Abiko, H et al., “A Channel Engineering Combined with Channel Epitaxy Optimization and TED Suppression for 0.15μm n-n Gate CMOS Technology”, 1995 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 23-24, 1995.
Chau, R et al., “A 50nm Depleted-Substrate CMOS Transistor (DST)”, Electron Device Meeting 2001, IEDM Technical Digest, IEEE International, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4, 2001.
Ducroquet, F et al. “Fully Depleted Silicon-On-Insulator nMOSFETs with Tensile Strained High Carbon Content Si1-yCy Channel”, ECS 210th Meeting, Abstract 1033, 2006.
Ernst, T et al., “Nanoscaled MOSFET Transistors on Strained Si, SiGe, Ge Layers: Some Integration and Electrical Properties Features”, ECS Trans. 2006, vol. 3, Issue 7, pp. 947-961, 2006.
Goesele, U et al., Diffusion Engineering by Carbon in Silicon, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610, 2000.
Hokazono, A et al., “Steep Channel & Halo Profiles Utilizing Boron-Diffusion-Barrier Layers (Si:C) for 32 nm Node and Beyond”, 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 112-113, 2008.
Hokazono, A et al., “Steep Channel Profiles in n/pMOS Controlled by Boron-Doped Si:C Layers for Continual Bulk-CMOS Scaling”, IEDM09-676 Symposium, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4, 2009.
Holland, OW and Thomas, DK “A Method to Improve Activation of Implanted Dopants in SiC”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2001.
'Kotaki, H., et al., “Novel Bulk Dynamic Threshold Voltage MOSFET (B-DTMOS) with Advanced Isolation (SITOS) and Gate to Shallow-Well Contact (SSS-C) Processes for Ultra Low Power Dual Gate CMOS”, IEDM 96, pp. 459-462, 1996.
Lavéant, P. “Incorporation, Diffusion and Agglomeration of Carbon in Silicon”, Solid State Phenomena, vols. 82-84, pp. 189-194, 2002.
Noda, K et al., “A 0.1-μm Delta-Doped MOSFET Fabricated with Post-Low-Energy Implanting Selective Epitaxy” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 809-814, Apr. 1998.