Method for forming a patient specific surgical guide mount

Abstract
A method includes mapping a contoured surface of at least one bone onto a digital model of a resection guide locator using a processor to create a digital model of a customized resection guide locator and manufacturing the customized resection guide locator. The customized resection guide locator includes a complementary surface of the at least one bone and a wall having a shape that is complementary to an outer profile of a resection guide and defining a pocket. A first elongate slot and at least one first hole are positioned within the pocket such that the first elongate slot aligns with a second elongate slot defined by the resection guide and the at least one first hole aligns with at least one second hole defined by the resection guide when the resection guide is received within the pocket of the customized resection guide locator.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to surgical guides, and the fixtures used to locate such guides in relation to a patient's body during orthopedic procedures, such as, total knee, hip, or ankle replacement surgery, and methods for designing and using such instrument locators.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Total joint (knee, hip, and ankle) replacement prostheses are known in the art. In many instances, a specially designed jig or fixture enables the surgeon to make accurate and precise bone resections of the femoral surface, the tibial surface, or both in order to accept such prostheses. The ultimate goal with any total joint prosthesis is to approximate the function of the natural, healthy structures that the prosthesis is replacing. Should the prosthesis not be properly attached to the femur, tibia, ankle or foot, any misalignment could result in discomfort to the patient, gate problems, or degradation of the prosthesis.


For example, when attaching a knee prosthesis it is desirable to orient the prosthesis such that the pivot axis of the knee joint lies within a transverse plane that is generally oriented perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. The mechanical axis lies along a line which intersects the femoral head and the center of the ankle. In the prior art, the mechanical axis had been determined from an inspection of a radiograph of the femur to be resected prior to, or even during the surgery. During the actual operation, the mechanical axis was determined by computing its valgus angle from the femoral shaft axis. It was then necessary to manually align any cutting guide and its fixtures with respect to the femoral shaft axis in order to achieve an optimum cut.


Often such cutting guides included a femoral intramedullary stem which was inserted through a pre-drilled passage way formed in the intercondylar notch and upwardly through the femur along the femoral shaft axis. The stem often included a bracket which supports a distal femur cutting guide. The bracket included a first pin which extended through the cutting guide to act as a pivot axis. A second pin was attached to the bracket so as to extend through an arcuate slot in the cutting guide. The cutting guide included pairs of opposing slots formed along its sides which were oriented to be perpendicular to a central axis of symmetry of the cutting guide. When the cutting guide was pivoted, such that the central axis of symmetry lay along the mechanical axis, so as to form the appropriate angle with the femoral shaft axis, the cutting guide slots were positioned to be perpendicular to the mechanical axis. The cutting guide was then locked into the predetermined angle with the femoral shaft axis.


In more recent times, computer-aided design techniques have been coupled with advances in imaging technology to improve joint replacement prostheses and methods. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,735,277, a process of producing an endoprosthesis for use in joint replacement is disclosed in which a reference image for determining contour differences on a femur and a tibia, are obtained by comparing a corrected preoperative image of a damaged knee joint with a postoperative image. This technique is then used as the basis for preparing corresponding femoral and tibial components of an endoprosthesis.


In U.S. Pat. No. 6,944,518, a method for making a joint prosthesis is provided in which computed tomography, commonly known as a CAT scan (CT) data from a patient's joint is used to design a prosthesis. The CT data is downloaded into a computer aided design software in order to design at least an attachment part, and possibly a functional part, of the prosthesis. The attachment part can be used to attach or otherwise associate the functional part to the patient's bone.


In U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,692, a method for producing prosthetic bone implants in which imaging technology is used to define hard tissue characteristics (size, shape, porosity, etc.) before a trauma occurs (“pre-trauma” file) by archival use of available imaging techniques (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or the like). Loss of hard tissue is determined by imaging in the locale of the affected tissue after the injury (“post-trauma” file). The physical properties of the customized prosthetic device are specified by comparison of the pre-trauma and post-trauma files to produce a solid model “design” file. This specification may also involve secondary manipulation of the files to assist in surgical implantation and to compensate for anticipated healing process. The design file is mathematically processed to produce a “sliced file” that is then used to direct a manufacturing system to construct a precise replica of the design file in a biocompatible material to produce the implant.


In U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,924, a method for producing endoprosthesis where a data block of a three-dimensional actual model of existing bone structure of a patient is acquired using CT scanning. In a computer, the actual model is subtracted from the data block of an existing or CT scan-generated three-dimensional reference model. Then from the difference, a computer-internal model for the endoprosthesis is formed. The data blocks of the actual model and reference model are converted into the data of a CAD free-form surface geometry.


None of the forgoing methods or devices have adequately provided surgeons with a way to generate patient specific prostheses, surgical instruments, guides, and fixtures, nor have they aided in reducing the number or complexity of the fixtures used to locate resection guides in relation to the patient's body during orthopedic procedures, such as, total knee, hip, or ankle replacement surgery.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method for forming a resection guide locator is provided that includes generating an anatomically accurate image of a bone, including details regarding its surface topographies. A femoral head, a distal femur, a distal tibia and a proximal tibia are each identified, and five millimeter thick slices are obtained, at three millimeter spacings. Sagittal slices may also be used in connection with the invention at 2 millimeter intervals and essentially zero millimeter spacing. A 2D T1 FSE (T1 weighted fast spin echo) imaging sequence is obtained and then anatomically accurate image is converted to a digital model. A digital representation of a resection guide locator is added to the digital model so as to form a composite digital model. Advantageously, one of the surface topographies is mapped complementarily onto a bone engagement portion of the resection guide locator, which is then manufactured based upon the composite digital model so that a manufactured resection guide locator is formed including the complementary surface topography on a bone engagement portion, and with a receptacle pocket sized to receive a resection guide with a press-fit.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully disclosed in, or rendered obvious by, the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts and further wherein:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of femoral and tibial resection guides mounted within resection guide locators that have been formed in accordance with the present invention and located upon portions of a femur and a tibia, respectively;



FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a scanned image of a human knee joint;



FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of the scanned image of the human knee joint shown in FIG. 2, after conversion to a computer model in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a schematic representation similar to FIG. 7;



FIG. 5 is a schematic representation, similar to FIG. 3, showing proposed resection lines and local coordinates superpositioned upon the computer model of FIG. 3, in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a schematic representation similar to FIGS. 4 and 5, but showing a femoral and a tibial resection guide locator represented within the computer model of FIG. 3 in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a schematic representation similar to FIGS. 4, 5, and 6, showing a digital representation of the femoral and tibial prostheses (in cross section) superimposed within the model in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a femoral resection guide locator formed in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 9 is a rear perspective view of the femoral resection guide locator shown in FIG. 8;



FIG. 10 is an elevational view of the front side of the femoral resection guide locator shown in FIG. 9;



FIG. 11 is an elevational view of the bottom of the femoral resection guide locator shown in FIGS. 8, 9 and 10;



FIG. 12 is a perspective view of a tibial resection guide locator formed in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 13 is a perspective bottom view of the tibial resection guide locator shown in FIG. 12;



FIG. 14 is a top view of the tibial resection guide locator shown in FIG. 13;



FIG. 15 is a rear elevational view of the tibial resection guide locator shown in FIG. 14;



FIG. 16 is a perspective view of a typical tibial resection guide;



FIG. 17 is a front elevational view of the tibial resection guide shown in FIG. 16;



FIG. 18 is a side perspective view of the tibial resection guide shown in FIG. 17;



FIG. 19 is a perspective view of a femoral resection guide mounted within a femoral resection guide locator positioned upon the condyles of a femur; and



FIG. 20 is a perspective view of a tibial resection guide mounted within a tibial resection guide locator positioned upon the articular surfaces of a tibia.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

This description of preferred embodiments is intended to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings, which are to be considered part of the entire written description of this invention. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features of the invention may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form in the interest of clarity and conciseness. In the description, relative terms such as “horizontal,” “vertical,” “up,” “down,” “top” and “bottom” as well as derivatives thereof (e.g., “horizontally,” “downwardly,” “upwardly,” etc.) should be construed to refer to the orientation as then described or as shown in the drawing figure under discussion. These relative terms are for convenience of description and normally are not intended to require a particular orientation. Terms including “inwardly” versus “outwardly,” “longitudinal” versus “lateral” and the like are to be interpreted relative to one another or relative to an axis of elongation, or an axis or center of rotation, as appropriate. Terms concerning attachments, coupling and the like, such as “connected” and “interconnected,” refer to a relationship wherein structures are secured or attached to one another either directly or indirectly through intervening structures, as well as both movable or rigid attachments or relationships, unless expressly described otherwise. When only a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein. The term “operatively connected” is such an attachment, coupling or connection that allows the pertinent structures to operate as intended by virtue of that relationship. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses, if used, are intended to cover the structures described, suggested, or rendered obvious by the written description or drawings for performing the recited function, including not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures.


The present invention provides custom manufactured surgical instruments, guides, and fixtures that are based upon a patient's anatomy as determined by a computer tomography scanner (CT), magnetic resonance imaging machine (MRI), or the like medical imaging technology. For example, a CT or MRI scanned image 1 or series of images may be taken of a patient's knee 1, including portions of the limb from the pelvis or the foot (FIGS. 2 and 3). In the case of a total knee replacement, the CT or MRI scanned image data is then converted from, e.g., a DICOM image format, to a solid computer model 3 of the lower limb often including the pelvis, femur, patella, tibia, or foot to determine implant alignment, type and sizing using specialized modeling methods that are often embodied in computer software. Computer generated solid models 3 that are derived from CT or MRI scan image data 1 will often include precise and accurate information regarding the surface contours surrounding the structures that have been imaged, e.g., the surface topography of the bones or contour of fascia that have been imaged.


The methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,768,134, issued to Swaelens et al., and incorporated herein by reference, have been found to yield adequate conversions of CT or MRI scanned image data 1 to solid computer model 3 usable with the present invention. In some embodiments, images are made of a lower limb, i.e., the pelvis, femur, patella, tibia, and/or foot of a patient using a CT or MRI machine, or other digital image capturing and processing unit (FIGS. 2 and 3). This scanning generates a scanned image of the diseased knee or ankle joint, including adjoining portions of the femur 5 and tibia 6. The image data 1 is first processed in a processing unit, after which a model is generated using the processed digitized image data.


With one embodiment of the invention scanned images of a diseased knee or ankle joint, including adjoining portions of the femur 5 and tibia 6, were generated using a Hitachi 0.3T Airis Elite open MRI. The Hitachi device comprises an asymmetric two-post open architecture, and provides a 0.3T magnetic field strength in a vertical orientation with high homogeneity. For example, scanned images of a diseased knee joint suitable for use in connection with the present invention incorporated sagittal slices of the knee using the patient's patella and tibial tubercle as anatomic landmarks. Two millimeter thickness slices, at zero millimeter slice spacing were gathered with the scan boundaries defining an approximate field of view of twelve centimeters proximal and nine centimeters distal of the joint line or the extent of the knee coil. A standard multiple array extremity coil was utilized with imaging set for bright cartilage and dark bone with crisp boundaries. The patient was placed with the leg to be scanned in the middle of the coil. It will be understood that in bilateral cases each leg would be scanned separately.


In addition to the forgoing parameters, when generating scanned images of a patient's knee for use in connection with the present invention, it is often preferable to acquire a FATSEP 3D RSSG imaging sequence with the parameters listed in the Table 1 below. For preferred results, very clear boundaries should be determined between the cartilage and surrounding soft tissues, and the cartilage and bone. The cartilage will often present a bright signal and the bone a dark signal, allowing clear contrast between the two materials.


Scanned images (axial slices) of femur 5 and tibia 6 associated with a diseased knee may also be generated utilizing the rapid body coil of the Hitachi 0.3T Airis Elite open MRI. Anatomic landmarks found to be useful for these scans included the femoral head and distal femur as well as the distal tibia and proximal tibia. Five millimeter thick slices, at three millimeter spacing provided preferred results with the present invention. Preferred scan boundaries included the proximal femoral head through distal femur and the most proximal tibial point through most distal tibial point, e.g., the ankle joint. The patient may be placed with leg to be scanned in the middle of the coil, it again being understood that in bilateral cases each leg would be scanned separately.


The field of view available from the rapid body coil may not always cover the entire femur or tibia within one scan. In such instances, the femur or tibia may be scanned in two separate regions. Between the two scans the patient will have to move in order to reposition the coil to cover the most proximal or distal regions of interest. It is important in such instances to provide as much overlap as possible between the two scans. The patient's leg should be placed in the middle of the coil to ensure the largest field of view possible without distortion. The corners of the images at the field of view limits of the coil are susceptible distortion. The patient's legs should be scanned separately, as bilateral scans place the proximal and distal ends of the knee joint region within the field of view limitation and within areas of possible distortion. Additionally, a 2D T1 FSE (T1 weighted fast spin echo) imaging sequence may be acquired with the parameters listed in the Table 1. It should be noted that the boundaries of the bone, from the ball of the femoral head down to the distal condyles, should be clear for processing.









TABLE 1







Hitachi 0.3T Airis Elite Sequence Overview











Hip-Knee
Knee
Ankle-Tibia














Coil
Rapid Body
Multiple Array
Rapid Body



Coil
Extremity Coil
Coil


Study (Pulse
2D T1 FSE
FATSEP 3D RSSG
2D T1 FSE


Sequence)


TR (ms)
2700
61
2700


TE (ms)
10
28.5
10


Plane
Axial
Sagittal
Axial


Slice Thickness (mm)
5
2
5


Slice Spacing (mm)
3
0
3


NEX
2
1
2


Flip Angle
90
90
90


Matrix
256 * 256
512 * 512
256 * 256


Acquisition Time
5:46
15:37
5:46


(min:sec)









In accordance with the present invention, interactive processing and preparation of the digitized image data is performed which includes the manipulation and introduction of additional extrinsic digital information 8, such as, predefined reference locations 9 for component positioning and alignment 10 so that adjustments to the surgical site, that will require resection during surgery, may be planned and mapped onto computer model 3 (FIGS. 4 and 5). After the interactive processing of the digitized image data, it is possible to go back to original CAD data to obtain a higher resolution digital representation of the patient specific surgical instrument, prostheses 7a, 7b (FIG. 7) guide, or fixture so as to add that digital representation to the patient's image data model.


For example, when the system of the present invention is used for knee replacement surgery, a digital representation of a femoral resection guide mount 20 may be added to the patient's image data model (FIGS. 1 and 6). In the context of a total knee replacement, femoral resection guide mount 20 may be formed for placement on the exposed condyles of a patient's femur to assure precise and accurate positioning of a femoral resection guide 26 which is used to direct and control bone resection of femur 5 during surgery. Although the femoral resection guide 26 can take various forms and configurations, the present invention will be described with reference to a distal resection guide currently offered by applicant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (Wright Medical Part No. K001-2659). Significantly, femoral resection guide mount 20 provides this precise and accurate positioning function without the need for other external fixtures or the use of an intramedullary stem inserted through the intercondylar notch and upwardly through femur 5 along the femoral shaft axis. A digital representation of a tibial resection guide mount 22 may also be added to the patient's image data model (FIG. 6). Tibial resection guide mount 22 is similarly formed for placement on the exposed superior articular surface of a patient's tibia 6 to assure precise and accurate positioning of a tibial resection guide 28 used to direct and control bone resection of the superior articular surface of the exposed tibia during surgery.


Referring to FIGS. 8-11, a femoral resection guide mount 20 according to one embodiment of the invention is formed from a resilient polymer material of the type that is suitable for use in connection with stereo lithography or the like manufacturing equipment. Resection guide mount 20 comprises a unitary block including a bifurcated condylar yolk 25 and a guide receptacle 29. Bifurcated yolk 25 includes a pair of spaced apart arms 30, 31 that project outwardly from a base 33. Arm 30 has a lower or bone engaging surface 36 and a through-bore 42, and arm 31 has a lower or bone engaging surface 40 and a through-bore 38. Through the previously discussed imaging operations, the bone engaging surfaces 36, 40 are configured for complimentary matching with anatomical surface features of a selected region of the patient's natural bone. For the fermoral resection guide mount 20 embodiment of FIGS. 8-11, the selected bone region comprises the condyles of the patient's femur.


Guide receptacle 29 includes a pair of wings 44,46 that project outwardly, in opposite directions from base 33 and in spaced relation to arms 30,31. Each wing 44, 46 includes a pylon 48 projecting upwardly to support guide housing 49 such that an elongate slot 52 is defined between base 33 and guide housing 49. Slot 52 is sized and shaped to allow a typical surgical saw, of the type often used for bone resection, to pass through from a correspondingly positioned and sized slot in resection guide 26 without contact, or with only incidental contact with resection guide locator 20. An annular wall 55, having a shape that is complementary to the outer profile of femoral resection guide 26, projects outwardly in substantially perpendicular relation to a back wall 61 and thereby defines a recess 58. In some preferred embodiments, recess 58 is sized so as to accept femoral resection guide 26 with a “press-fit”. By press-fit it should be understood that annular wall 55 is sufficiently resilient to deflect or compress elastically so as to store elastic energy when femoral resection guide 26 is pushed into recess 58. Of course, it will also be understood that femoral resection guide 26 will have an outer circumferential shape that is complementary to the circumferential shape of recess 58, but slightly larger in size, for press-fit embodiments. Also, femoral resection guide 26 may be retained within recess 58 by only frictional engagement with annular wall 55 or, in less preferred embodiments, resection guide 26 can simply slide into recess 58 without operative contact or only incidental engagement with annular wall 55. First through-bores 62, 64 are defined in back wall 61 in spaced relation to one another, with a second through-bore 67,69 being associated with each first through-bore 62,64. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 8-11, the first through-bores 62, 64 are large square or rectangular openings, a configuration that eases manufacture, reduces material use, and provides sufficient space for driving pins, wires, screws or other appropriate fasteners through a plurality of adjacent bores provided on the femoral resection guide 26. A groove 70 is defined in the outer surface of base 33 and centrally located with respect to recess 58.


Referring to FIGS. 12-18, a tibial resection guide mount 22 according to one embodiment of the invention is formed from a resilient polymer material of the type that is suitable for use in connection with stereo lithography, selective laser sintering, or the like manufacturing equipment, e.g., a polyamide powder repaid prototype material is suitable for use in connection with selective laser sintering. Resection guide mount 22 comprises a unitary block including a bifurcated yolk 75 and a guide receptacle 79. Bifurcated yolk 75 includes a pair of spaced apart arms 80, 81 that project outwardly from a base 83. Arm 80 has a lower surface 86 and arm 81 has a lower surface 90.


Guide receptacle 79 includes a pair of wings 84, 86 that project outwardly, in opposite directions from base 83 and in spaced relation to arms 80,81. Each wing 84,86 includes a pylon 88 projecting upwardly to support guide housing 89 such that an elongate slot 94 is defined between base 83 and guide housing 89. Slot 94 is sized and shaped to allow a typical surgical saw, of the type often used for bone resection, to pass through from a correspondingly positioned and sized slot in resection guide 28 without contact, or with only incidental contact with resection guide locator 22. An annular wall 95, having a shape that is complementary to the outer profile of tibial resection guide 28, projects outwardly in substantially perpendicular relation to a back wall 101 and thereby defines a recess 108. Recess 108 is sized so as to accept tibial resection guide 28 with a press-fit. First through-bores 112, 114 are defined in back wall 101 in spaced relation to one another, with a second through-bore 117, 119 being associated with each first through-bore 112, 114.


Returning to the digital image models 3 previously disclosed, and considering a generalized digital model of resection guide mount 20 added to the patient's femur image data, the anatomic surface features of the patient's femur, e.g., the condylar surface topography, may be complementarily mapped onto each of lower surface 36 and lower surface 40 of arms 30, 31. It will be understood that complementary mapping of the digital images results in localized prominences on the surface of a bone, e.g., a condyle or articular surface, becoming localized concavities on lower surface 36 or lower surface 40, while localized concavities on the surface of a bone become localized prominences on lower surface 36 or lower surface 40. In this way, each of lower surface 36 and lower surface 40 is redefined with a complementary, substantially mirror image of the anatomic surface features of a selected region of the patient's femur. As a consequence of this complementary bone surface mapping, resection guide mount 20 releasably “locks” on to the complementary topography of the corresponding portion of the patient's natural femur, e.g., the condylar surfaces, without the need for other external or internal guidance fixtures. A substantially identical mapping is carried out in connection with the design of a patient specific tibial resection guide mount 22.


A visual presentation of the virtual alignment results between the patient's femur and resection guide mount 20 is created and forwarded to the surgeon to obtain approval of the results prior to manufacturing (FIGS. 1, 19, 20). Upon receipt of the surgeon's approval, resection guide mount 20, and in appropriate instances resection guide mount 22, is manufactured and returned to the surgeon for use in the surgery.


During a total knee replacement the present invention is used in the following manner. The surgeon first orients resection guide mount 20 on femur 5 until lower surfaces 36, 40 of resection guide mount 20 “lock” to the topography of the exposed surface 4 of femur 5. With resection guide mount 20 locked onto the patient's femur, a surgeon press-fits an appropriately configured Distal Resection Guide 26 (e.g. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Part No. K001-2659) in recess 58 of resection guide mount 20. As indicated in FIGS. 19-20, this results in the resection guide mount 20, and particularly the guide receptacle portion 29 of the resection guide mount 20, being sandwiched between the resection guide 26 and the patient's bone. Pins are driven into through-bores of the resection guide 26, but advantageously the pins do not come into contact with the portions of resection guide mount 20 that define through-bores 62, 64 or 67, 69. These through-bores are often the most proximal on resection guide mount 20. With resection guide mount 20 held securely in place, a drill bit is advanced into through-bores 38 and 42, through-bores 62, 64 defined in back wall 61, and/or into second through-bores 67,69. It is often preferable for the drill to protrude about 15 mm into through-bores 38 and 42 into the femoral bone so the drill holes will be present after the distal resection. Increased hole depth may be necessary in the event of a larger distal resection to correct a flexion contracture. For additional stability, fixation pins (not shown) may be left in through-bores 38 and 42, but must be removed prior to resection. With the resection guide mount 20 thus accurately positioned with respect to the selected bone region and the resection guide 26—guide mount 20 construct appropriately secured to the patient's bone, the surgeon uses a conventional surgical blade and the resection slot of the resection guide 26 to resect the patient's bone.


It is to be understood that the present invention is by no means limited only to the particular constructions herein disclosed and shown in the drawings, but also comprises any modifications or equivalents within the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of preparing a distal femur of a patient for receipt of an implant, comprising: mapping a contoured surface said distal femur onto a digital model of a resection guide locator using a processor to create a digital model of a customized resection guide locator; andmanufacturing the customized resection guide locator such that the customized resection guide locator includes: a complementary surface of said distal femur,a wall having a shape that is complementary to an outer profile of a resection guide such that a pocket is defined that is sized and configured to receive the resection guide therein,wherein a first elongate slot and at least one first hole are defined within the pocket, the first elongate slot and the at least one first hole are positioned within the pocket such that the first elongate slot aligns with a second elongate slot defined by the resection guide and the at least one first hole aligns with at least one second hole defined by the resection guide when the resection guide is received within the pocket of the customized resection guide locator.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising acquiring an anatomically accurate image of said distal femur by scanning said distal femur of a patient in two scans, wherein between the scans the patient is moved in order to reposition a coil of an imaging apparatus to cover a most proximal or a most distal region of said distal femur;converting the anatomically accurate image to a digital model of said distal femur.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein mapping the contoured surface of said distal femur onto a digital model of a resection guide locator includes applying the digital model of the resection guide locator to a surface of the digital model of said distal femur.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the resection guide locator is manufactured using stereo lithography.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the resection guide locator is manufactured using selective laser sintering.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one first hole does not intersect the first elongate slot.
  • 7. A method of preparing a distal femur of a patient for receipt of an implant, comprising: mapping a contoured surface of said distal femur onto a digital model of a resection guide locator using a processor to create a digital model of a customized resection guide locator; andmanufacturing the customized resection guide locator using stereo lithography such that the customized resection guide locator includes: a complementary surface of said distal femur,a wall having a shape that is complementary to an outer profile of a resection guide such that a pocket is defined that is sized and configured to receive the resection guide therein,wherein a first elongate slot and a first pair of holes are defined within the pocket, the first elongate slot and the first pair of holes are positioned within the pocket such that the first elongate slot aligns with a second elongate slot defined by the resection guide and the first pair of holes align with a second pair of holes defined by the resection guide when the resection guide is received within the pocket of the customized resection guide locator.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising acquiring an anatomically accurate image of said distal femur by scanning said distal femur of a patient in two scans, wherein between the scans the patient is moved in order to reposition a coil of an imaging apparatus to cover a most proximal or a most distal region of said distal femur;converting the anatomically accurate image to a digital model of said distal femur.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein mapping the contoured surface of said distal femur onto a digital model of a resection guide locator includes applying the digital model of the resection guide locator to a surface of the digital model of said distal femur.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein scanning said distal femur in two scans includes applying a pulse sequence to the coil of the imaging apparatus of at least one of a FATSEP 3D RSSG and a 2D T1 FSE.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, wherein scanning said distal femur in two scans includes performing at least one of the two scans with an acquisition time of at least one of 5:46 (min:sec) and 15:37 (min:sec).
  • 12. The method of claim 7, wherein the first pair of holes do not intersect the first elongate slot.
  • 13. The method of claim 7, wherein the pocket of the customized resection guide locator is sized to receive the resection guide with a press fit.
  • 14. A method of preparing a distal femur of a patient for receipt of an implant, comprising: mapping a contoured surface of said distal femur onto a digital model of a resection guide locator using a processor to create a digital model of a customized resection guide locator; andmanufacturing the customized resection guide locator using laser sintering such that the customized resection guide locator includes: a complementary surface of said distal femur,a wall having a shape that is complementary to an outer profile of a resection guide such that a pocket is defined that is sized and configured to receive the resection guide therein,wherein a first elongate slot and a first pair of holes are defined within the pocket, the elongate slot and the first pair of holes are positioned within the pocket such that the first elongate slot aligns with a second elongate slot defined by the resection guide and the first pair of holes align with a second pair of holes defined by the resection guide when the resection guide is received within the pocket of the customized resection guide locator.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising acquiring an anatomically accurate image of said distal femur by scanning said distal femur of a patient in two scans, wherein between the scans the patient is moved in order to reposition a coil of an imaging apparatus to cover a most proximal or a most distal region of said distal femur;converting the anatomically accurate image to a digital model of said distal femur.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein mapping the contoured surface of said distal femur onto a digital model of a resection guide locator includes applying the digital model of the resection guide locator to a surface of the digital model of said distal femur.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein scanning said distal femur in two scans includes applying a pulse sequence to the coil of the imaging apparatus of at least one of a FATSEP 3D RSSG and a 2D T1 FSE.
  • 18. The method of claim 15, wherein scanning said distal femur in two scans includes performing at least one of the two scans with an acquisition time of at least one of 5:46 (min:sec) and 15:37 (min:sec).
  • 19. The method of claim 14, wherein the first pair of holes do not intersect the first elongate slot.
  • 20. The method of claim 14, wherein the pocket of the customized resection guide locator is sized to receive the resection guide with a press fit.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/691,033, filed Apr. 20, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,883,870), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/711,307 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,113,914), which was filed Feb. 24, 2010 claiming the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/154,845, filed Feb. 24, 2009, the entireties of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (415)
Number Name Date Kind
3314420 Smith et al. Apr 1967 A
3605123 Hahn Sep 1971 A
3798679 Ewald Mar 1974 A
3808606 Tronzo May 1974 A
3843975 Tronzo Oct 1974 A
3855638 Pilliar Dec 1974 A
3938198 Kahn et al. Feb 1976 A
3987499 Scharbach et al. Oct 1976 A
4052753 Dedo Oct 1977 A
4055862 Farling Nov 1977 A
4085466 Goodfellow et al. Apr 1978 A
4098626 Graham et al. Jul 1978 A
4203444 Bonnell et al. May 1980 A
4213816 Morris Jul 1980 A
4340978 Buechel et al. Jul 1982 A
4368040 Weissman Jan 1983 A
4436684 White Mar 1984 A
4501266 McDaniel Feb 1985 A
4502161 Wall Mar 1985 A
4586496 Keller May 1986 A
4594380 Chapin et al. Jun 1986 A
4601290 Effron et al. Jul 1986 A
4609551 Caplan et al. Sep 1986 A
4627853 Campbell et al. Dec 1986 A
4703751 Pohl Nov 1987 A
4704686 Aldinger Nov 1987 A
4715860 Amstutz et al. Dec 1987 A
4721104 Kaufman et al. Jan 1988 A
4759350 Dunn et al. Jul 1988 A
4769040 Wevers Sep 1988 A
4841975 Woolson Jun 1989 A
4846835 Grande Jul 1989 A
4865607 Witzel et al. Sep 1989 A
4880429 Stone Nov 1989 A
4936862 Walker et al. Jun 1990 A
4979949 Matsen, III et al. Dec 1990 A
5002547 Poggie et al. Mar 1991 A
5041138 Vacanti et al. Aug 1991 A
5059216 Winters Oct 1991 A
5067964 Richmond et al. Nov 1991 A
5122144 Bert et al. Jun 1992 A
5129908 Petersen Jul 1992 A
5133759 Turner Jul 1992 A
5154717 Matsen, III et al. Oct 1992 A
5162430 Rhee et al. Nov 1992 A
5171322 Kenny Dec 1992 A
5197985 Caplan et al. Mar 1993 A
5206023 Hunziker Apr 1993 A
5226914 Caplan et al. Jul 1993 A
5234433 Bert et al. Aug 1993 A
5250050 Poggie et al. Oct 1993 A
5258032 Bertin Oct 1993 A
5270300 Hunziker Dec 1993 A
5288797 Khalil et al. Feb 1994 A
5303148 Mattson et al. Apr 1994 A
5306311 Stone et al. Apr 1994 A
5314482 Goodfellow et al. May 1994 A
5344459 Swartz Sep 1994 A
5360446 Kennedy Nov 1994 A
5365996 Crook Nov 1994 A
5368858 Hunziker Nov 1994 A
5370692 Fink et al. Dec 1994 A
5380332 Ferrante Jan 1995 A
5387216 Thornhill et al. Feb 1995 A
5454816 Ashby Oct 1995 A
5462550 Dietz et al. Oct 1995 A
5468787 Braden et al. Nov 1995 A
5474559 Bertin et al. Dec 1995 A
5478739 Slivka et al. Dec 1995 A
5486180 Dietz et al. Jan 1996 A
5501687 Willert et al. Mar 1996 A
5503162 Athanasiou et al. Apr 1996 A
5523843 Yamane et al. Jun 1996 A
5540696 Booth, Jr. et al. Jul 1996 A
5542947 Treacy Aug 1996 A
5554190 Draenert Sep 1996 A
5556432 Kubein-Meesenburg et al. Sep 1996 A
5571205 James Nov 1996 A
5575793 Carls et al. Nov 1996 A
5578037 Sanders et al. Nov 1996 A
5593450 Scott et al. Jan 1997 A
5597379 Haines et al. Jan 1997 A
5601563 Burke et al. Feb 1997 A
5613970 Houston et al. Mar 1997 A
5616146 Murray Apr 1997 A
5630820 Todd May 1997 A
5632745 Schwartz Jul 1997 A
5658290 Techeira Aug 1997 A
5649929 Callaway Sep 1997 A
5671741 Lang et al. Sep 1997 A
5682886 Delp et al. Nov 1997 A
5683466 Vitale Nov 1997 A
5684562 Fujieda Nov 1997 A
5688282 Baron et al. Nov 1997 A
5728162 Eckhoff Mar 1998 A
5735277 Schuster Apr 1998 A
5749874 Schwartz May 1998 A
5749876 Duvillier et al. May 1998 A
5765561 Chen et al. Jun 1998 A
5768134 Swaelens et al. Jun 1998 A
5769899 Schwartz et al. Jun 1998 A
5786217 Tuba et al. Jul 1998 A
5798924 Eufinger et al. Aug 1998 A
5800438 Tuke et al. Sep 1998 A
5824083 Draenert Oct 1998 A
5827289 Reiley et al. Oct 1998 A
5830216 Insall et al. Nov 1998 A
5835619 Morimoto et al. Nov 1998 A
5842477 Naughton et al. Dec 1998 A
5847804 Sarver et al. Dec 1998 A
5853746 Hunziker Dec 1998 A
5860981 Bertin et al. Jan 1999 A
5871018 Delp et al. Feb 1999 A
5871542 Goodfellow et al. Feb 1999 A
5871546 Colleran et al. Feb 1999 A
5879390 Kubein-Meesenburg et al. Mar 1999 A
5880976 DiGioia, III et al. Mar 1999 A
5885296 Masini Mar 1999 A
5885297 Matsen, III Mar 1999 A
5885298 Herrington et al. Mar 1999 A
5897559 Masini Apr 1999 A
5899859 Votruba et al. May 1999 A
5900245 Sawhney et al. May 1999 A
5906934 Grande et al. May 1999 A
5911723 Ashby et al. Jun 1999 A
5916220 Masini Jun 1999 A
5939323 Valentini et al. Aug 1999 A
5961523 Masini Oct 1999 A
5968051 Luckman et al. Oct 1999 A
5972385 Liu et al. Oct 1999 A
5995738 DiGioia, III et al. Nov 1999 A
6001895 Harvey et al. Dec 1999 A
6002859 DiGioia, III et al. Dec 1999 A
6006126 Cosman Dec 1999 A
6007537 Burkinshaw et al. Dec 1999 A
6010509 Delgado et al. Jan 2000 A
6013081 Burkinshaw et al. Jan 2000 A
6013103 Kaufman et al. Jan 2000 A
6046379 Stone et al. Apr 2000 A
6056754 Haines et al. May 2000 A
6056756 Eng et al. May 2000 A
6057927 Levesque et al. May 2000 A
6077270 Katz Jun 2000 A
6082364 Balian et al. Jul 2000 A
6090144 Letot et al. Jul 2000 A
6093204 Stone Jul 2000 A
6096043 Techiera et al. Aug 2000 A
6102916 Masini Aug 2000 A
6106529 Techiera Aug 2000 A
6110209 Stone Aug 2000 A
6120541 Johnson Sep 2000 A
6126690 Ateshian et al. Oct 2000 A
6139578 Lee et al. Oct 2000 A
6156069 Amstutz Dec 2000 A
6161080 Aouni-Ateshian et al. Dec 2000 A
6187010 Masini Feb 2001 B1
6200606 Peterson et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203546 MacMahon Mar 2001 B1
6203576 Afriat et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205411 DiGioia, III et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206927 Fell et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214369 Grande et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217894 Sawhney et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219571 Hargreaves et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224632 Pappas et al. May 2001 B1
6235060 Kubein-Meesenburg et al. May 2001 B1
6251143 Schwartz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254639 Peckitt Jul 2001 B1
6277151 Lee et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281195 Rueger et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283980 Vibe-Hansen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296646 Williamson Oct 2001 B1
6299905 Peterson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6322588 Ogle et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327491 Franklin et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328765 Hardwick et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344043 Pappas Feb 2002 B1
6344059 Krakovits et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352558 Spector Mar 2002 B1
6358253 Torrie et al. Mar 2002 B1
6365405 Salzmann et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371958 Overaker Apr 2002 B1
6373250 Tsoref et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375658 Hangody et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379367 Vibe-Hansen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6382028 Wooh et al. May 2002 B1
6383228 Schmotzer May 2002 B1
6387131 Miehlke et al. May 2002 B1
6429013 Halvorsen et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443988 Felt et al. Sep 2002 B2
6443991 Running Sep 2002 B1
6444222 Asculai et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458135 Harwin et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459927 Franklin et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459948 Ateshian et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468314 Schwartz et al. Oct 2002 B2
6478799 Williamson Nov 2002 B1
6479996 Hoogeveen et al. Nov 2002 B1
6510334 Schuster et al. Jan 2003 B1
6520964 Tallarida et al. Feb 2003 B2
6558421 Fell et al. May 2003 B1
6560476 Pelletier et al. May 2003 B1
6575980 Robie et al. Jun 2003 B1
6620168 Lombardo et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626945 Simon et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626948 Storer et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632225 Sanford et al. Oct 2003 B2
6632235 Weikel et al. Oct 2003 B2
6652587 Felt et al. Nov 2003 B2
6673077 Katz Jan 2004 B1
6679917 Ek Jan 2004 B2
6712856 Carignan et al. Mar 2004 B1
6738657 Franklin et al. May 2004 B1
6905514 Carignan et al. Jun 2005 B2
6916341 Rolston Jul 2005 B2
6928742 Broers et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932842 Litschko et al. Aug 2005 B1
6942667 Song Sep 2005 B1
6944518 Roose Sep 2005 B2
6969393 Pinczewski et al. Nov 2005 B2
6980849 Sasso Dec 2005 B2
6988015 Schopf et al. Jan 2006 B1
6993374 Sasso Jan 2006 B2
7008430 Dong et al. Mar 2006 B2
7058439 Eaton et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060074 Rosa et al. Jun 2006 B2
7104997 Lionberger et al. Sep 2006 B2
7115131 Engh et al. Oct 2006 B2
7117027 Zheng et al. Oct 2006 B2
7141053 Rosa et al. Nov 2006 B2
7184814 Lang et al. Feb 2007 B2
7201762 Green, Jr. et al. Apr 2007 B2
7217276 Henderson et al. May 2007 B2
7239908 Alexander et al. Jul 2007 B1
7245697 Lang Jul 2007 B2
7282054 Steffensmeier et al. Oct 2007 B2
7292674 Lang Nov 2007 B2
7347690 Jordan et al. Mar 2008 B2
7364581 Michalowicz Apr 2008 B2
7377924 Raistrick et al. May 2008 B2
7379529 Lang May 2008 B2
7467892 Lang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7468075 Lang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7534263 Burdulis, Jr. et al. May 2009 B2
7618451 Berez et al. Nov 2009 B2
7747305 Dean et al. Jun 2010 B2
7806896 Bonutti Oct 2010 B1
7881768 Lang et al. Feb 2011 B2
7981158 Fitz et al. Jul 2011 B2
7983777 Melton et al. Jul 2011 B2
8036729 Lang et al. Oct 2011 B2
8062302 Lang et al. Nov 2011 B2
8066708 Lang et al. Nov 2011 B2
8083745 Lang et al. Dec 2011 B2
8105330 Fitz et al. Jan 2012 B2
8112142 Alexander et al. Feb 2012 B2
8122592 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Feb 2012 B2
RE43282 Alexander et al. Mar 2012 E
8715362 Reiley et al. May 2014 B2
20010001120 Masini May 2001 A1
20010010023 Schwartz et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010039455 Simon et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020013626 Geisllich et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020029038 Haines Mar 2002 A1
20020045940 Giannelli et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020059049 Bradbury et al. May 2002 A1
20020068979 Brown et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020072821 Baker Jun 2002 A1
20020079601 Russell et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082703 Repicci Jun 2002 A1
20020087274 Alexander et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106625 Hung et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020115647 Halvorsen et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120274 Overaker et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120281 Overaker Aug 2002 A1
20020123817 Clasbrummel et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020127264 Felt et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133230 Repicci Sep 2002 A1
20020143402 Steinberg Oct 2002 A1
20020151986 Asculai et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156150 Asculai et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156479 Schulzki et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020173852 Felt et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020183850 Felt et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198531 Millard et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030028196 Bonutti Feb 2003 A1
20030055500 Fell et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055501 Fell et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055502 Lang et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060882 Fell et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060883 Fell et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060884 Fell et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060885 Fell et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030100907 Rosa et al. May 2003 A1
20030100953 Rosa et al. May 2003 A1
20030120347 Steinberg Jun 2003 A1
20030158558 Horn Aug 2003 A1
20030158606 Coon et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163137 Smucker et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030173695 Monkhouse et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030216669 Lang et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225457 Justin et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236521 Brown et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040098133 Carignan et al. May 2004 A1
20040102852 Johnson et al. May 2004 A1
20040122521 Lee et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133276 Lang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138754 Lang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147927 Tsougarakis et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153079 Tsougarakis et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040153162 Sanford et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040153164 Sanford et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167390 Alexander et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167630 Rolston Aug 2004 A1
20040193280 Webster et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040204644 Tsougarakis et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204760 Fitz et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040230197 Tornier et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236424 Berez Nov 2004 A1
20040249386 Faoro Dec 2004 A1
20050015153 Goble et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021039 Cusick et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050043807 Wood Feb 2005 A1
20050049603 Calton et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055028 Haines Mar 2005 A1
20050085920 Williamson Apr 2005 A1
20050107883 Goodfried et al. May 2005 A1
20050107884 Johnson et al. May 2005 A1
20050119664 Carignan et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143745 Hodorek et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050148843 Roose Jul 2005 A1
20050171545 Walsh et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171612 Rolston Aug 2005 A1
20050192588 Garcia Sep 2005 A1
20050216305 Funderud Sep 2005 A1
20050234461 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050267584 Burdulis et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060052795 Burdulis et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060111722 Bouadi May 2006 A1
20060149283 May et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060200162 Farling et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235421 Rosa et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070015995 Lang Jan 2007 A1
20070073305 Lionberger et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070118141 Marchyn et al. May 2007 A1
20070198022 Lang et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203430 Lang et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070233151 Chudik Oct 2007 A1
20070233156 Metzger Oct 2007 A1
20070276224 Lang et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070293868 Delfosse et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080004709 O'Neill et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015433 Alexander et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080025463 Lang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080031412 Delfosse et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058613 Lang et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080058945 Hajaj et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080114370 Schoenefeld May 2008 A1
20080161815 Schoenefeld et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170659 Lang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195216 Lang Aug 2008 A1
20080219412 Lang Sep 2008 A1
20080243127 Lang Oct 2008 A1
20080275452 Lang et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281328 Lang et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281329 Lang et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281426 Fitz et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080287953 Sers Nov 2008 A1
20090024131 Metzger et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090076371 Lang et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090087276 Rose Apr 2009 A1
20090088753 Aram et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090088758 Bennett Apr 2009 A1
20090088763 Aram et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090099567 Zajac Apr 2009 A1
20090131941 Park et al. May 2009 A1
20090131942 Aker et al. May 2009 A1
20090138020 Park et al. May 2009 A1
20090222014 Bojarski et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090307893 Bojarski et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100160917 Fitz et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100262150 Lian Oct 2010 A1
20100281678 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100298894 Bojarski et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100305573 Fitz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100305574 Fitz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110066193 Lang et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071581 Lang et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110213368 Fitz et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110213373 Fitz et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110213374 Fitz et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110213377 Lang et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110213427 Fitz et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110213428 Fitz et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110213429 Lang et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110213430 Lang et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110213431 Fitz et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110218539 Fitz et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110218584 Fitz et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110230888 Lang et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238073 Lang et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110313423 Lang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319897 Lang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319900 Lang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120029520 Lang et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120041446 Wong et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120066892 Lang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071881 Lang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071882 Lang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071883 Lang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120072185 Lang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120101503 Lang et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120143197 Lang et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120151730 Fitz et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158001 Burdulis, Jr. et al. Jun 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (100)
Number Date Country
101111197 Jan 2008 CN
2306552 Aug 1974 DE
3516743 Nov 1986 DE
44 34 539 Apr 1996 DE
20303498 Aug 2003 DE
0377901 Oct 1989 EP
0528080 Feb 1993 EP
0530804 Oct 1993 EP
0626156 Nov 1994 EP
0704193 Apr 1996 EP
0896825 Feb 1999 EP
0613380 Dec 1999 EP
0993807 Apr 2000 EP
1074229 Feb 2001 EP
1077253 Feb 2001 EP
1120087 Aug 2001 EP
1129675 Sep 2001 EP
1132061 Sep 2001 EP
0732091 Dec 2001 EP
0814731 Aug 2002 EP
1234552 Aug 2002 EP
1234555 Aug 2002 EP
0809987 Oct 2002 EP
0833620 Oct 2002 EP
2819714 Jul 2002 FR
1451283 Sep 1976 GB
2291355 Jan 1996 GB
2348373 Oct 2000 GB
8-173465 Jul 1996 JP
9-206322 Aug 1997 JP
2002-102236 Apr 2002 JP
WO 8702882 May 1987 WO
WO 90009769 Sep 1990 WO
WO 93004710 Mar 1993 WO
WO 93009819 May 1993 WO
WO 93025157 Dec 1993 WO
WO 95027450 Oct 1995 WO
WO 95028688 Oct 1995 WO
WO 95030390 Nov 1995 WO
WO 95032623 Dec 1995 WO
WO 96024302 Aug 1996 WO
WO 97025942 Jul 1997 WO
WO 97026847 Jul 1997 WO
WO 97027885 Aug 1997 WO
WO 97038676 Oct 1997 WO
WO 98012994 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9820816 May 1998 WO
WO 98030617 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9832384 Jul 1998 WO
WO 99002654 Jan 1999 WO
WO 99008598 Feb 1999 WO
WO 99008728 Feb 1999 WO
WO 99042061 Aug 1999 WO
WO 99047186 Sep 1999 WO
WO 99051719 Oct 1999 WO
WO 99056674 Nov 1999 WO
WO 00009179 Feb 2000 WO
WO 00015153 Mar 2000 WO
WO 00035346 Jun 2000 WO
WO 00048550 Aug 2000 WO
WO 00059411 Oct 2000 WO
WO 00074554 Dec 2000 WO
WO 01010356 Feb 2001 WO
WO 01017463 Mar 2001 WO
WO 01019254 Mar 2001 WO
WO 01035968 May 2001 WO
WO 01045764 Jun 2001 WO
WO 01068800 Sep 2001 WO
WO 01070142 Sep 2001 WO
WO 01091672 Dec 2001 WO
WO 02000270 Jan 2002 WO
WO 02000275 Jan 2002 WO
WO 02002158 Jan 2002 WO
WO 02022013 Mar 2002 WO
WO 02022014 Mar 2002 WO
WO 02023483 Mar 2002 WO
WO 02034310 May 2002 WO
WO 02036147 May 2002 WO
WO 02096268 Dec 2002 WO
WO 03007788 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03037192 May 2003 WO
WO 03047470 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03051210 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03055400 Jul 2003 WO
WO 04043305 May 2004 WO
WO 04049981 Jun 2004 WO
WO 05051239 Jun 2005 WO
WO 05051240 Jun 2005 WO
WO 06060795 Jun 2006 WO
WO 06127283 Nov 2006 WO
WO 07041375 Apr 2007 WO
WO 07092841 Aug 2007 WO
WO 08112996 Sep 2008 WO
WO 08157412 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009001083 Dec 2008 WO
WO 09111639 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2010099142 Sep 2010 WO
WO 10121147 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2007061983 Sep 2011 WO
WO 2011110374 Sep 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (51)
Entry
Andersson, et al., “Macintosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Acta. Orthrop. Scand., 1974, pp. 245-259, 45(2).
Argenson, et al., “Is There a Place for Patellofemoral Arthroplasty?,”Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 321, 1995, pp. 162-167.
Birnbaum, et al., “Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery with Individual Templates and Comparison to Conventional Operation Method,” Spine, Feb. 2001, pp. 365-369, vol. 26, No. 4.
Chelule, et al., “Computer Aided Design of Personalized Jigs in Total Knee Replacement,” 3rd Annual Meeting of CAOS Int'l Proc., Jun. 18-21, 2003, pp. 58-59, Spain.
Dare, S. et al., “Use of Computerized Tomography and Numerical Control Machining for the Fabrication of Custom Arthroplasty Prostheses.” Second World Congress on Biomaterials, 10th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, p. 233, Washington, D.C., Apr. 27-May 1, 1984.
De Winter, et al., “The Richards Type II Patellofemoral Arthroplasty,” Acta Orthop Scand, 2001, pp. 487-490, 72(5).
Delp, et al., “A Graphics-Based Software System to Develop and Analyze Models of Musculoskeletal Structures,” Comput. Biol. Med., 1995, pp. 21-34, vol. 25, No. 1.
Farrar, et al., “Computed Tomography Scan Scout Film for Measurement of Femoral Axis in Knee Arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, 1999, pp. 1030-1031, vol. 14, No. 8.
First Office Action for Japanese Patent Appln. No. 2011-552091, dated Oct. 25, 2013.
Froemel, et al., “Computer Assisted Template Based Navigation for Total Knee Replacement,” Documents presented at CAOS on Jun. 17, 2001, 4 pages.
Hafez, et al., “Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Could a Two-Piece Custom Template Replace the Complex Conventional Instrumentations?”, 4th Annual Meeting of CAOS Int'l Proc., Jun. 16-19, 2004, pp. 63-64, Chicago.
Hafez, et al., “Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Present and the Future,” Future Rheumatol., 2006, pp. 121-131, vol. 1.
Kim, et al., “Measurement of Femoral Neck Anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D Imaging Method,” Med. and Biol. Eng. and Computing, 2000, pp. 603-609, vol. 38, No. 6.
Lam, et al., “X-Ray Diagnosis: A Physician's Approach,” 1998, Title page and Table of Contents pages Only, ISBN 9813083247, Springer-Verlag publishers.
Lam. et al.. “VarusNalgus Alignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty,” The Knee, 2003, pp. 237-241, vol. 10.
Lu, et al., “In Vitro Degradation of Porous poly(L-lactic acid) Foams,” Biomaterials, Aug. 2000, pp. 1595-1605, 21(15).
Marler, et al., “Soft-Tissue Augmentation with Injectable Alginate and Synegeneic Fibroblasts,” Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, May 2000 pp. 2049-2058, 105(6).
PCT/US2010/025143, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Sep. 9, 2011.
Portheine, “Model-Based Operation Planning in Orthopedic Surgery,” Thesis, Apr. 22, 2004, 90 pages, RWTH Aachen University, in German.
Portheine, “Model-Based Operation Planning in Orthopedic Surgery,” Thesis, Apr. 22, 2004, 170 pages, RWTH Aachen University, English Translation with Certification.
Portheine, et al., “Potentials of CT-based Planning and Template-based Procedure in Hip and Knee Surgery,” Orth. Prac., 2000, pp. 786-791, vol. 36, English Translation with Certification.
Portheine. et al.. “Potentials of CT-based Planning and Template-based Procedure in Hip and Knee Surgery,” Orth. Prac., 2000, pp. 786-791, vol. 36, in German.
Radermacher, “Computer Assisted Matching of Planning and Execution in Orthopedic Surgery,” Slide Presentation, Nov. 29, 1993, 22 pages.
Radermacher, “Computer-Based Decision Support in the Selection and Evaluation of Contact Surfaces for Manual Referencing,” Lecture presented at Helmholtz Meeting '98 and OSS '98, 7 pages, in German.
Radermacher, “Computer-Based Decision Support in the Selection and Evaluation of Contact Surfaces for Manual Referencing,” Lecture presented at Helmholtz Meeting '98 and OSS '98, 8 pages, English Translation with Certifications.
Radermacher, “Image Guided Orthopedic Surgery with Individual Templates,” Helmholtz-Institute for Biomed. Eng., 1997, 2 pages.
Radermacher, “Template Based Navigation—An Efficient Technique for Hip and Knee Surgery,” CAOS First Asian Meet, Mar. 27-28, 2004, pp. 45-50, India.
Radermacher, et al., “Computer Assisted Matching of Planning and Execution in Orthopedic Surgery,” IEEE, EMBS, 1993, pp. 946-947, San Diego.
Radermacher, et al., “Computer Integrated Advanced Orthopedics (CIAO),” 2nd European Conference on Eng. and Med., Apr. 26, 1993, 12 pages.
Radermacher, et al., “Computer Integrated Surgery—Connecting Planning and Execution of Surgical Intervention in Orthopedics,” Surgical Therapy Technology, Helmholtz-Institut Aachen Research Report, 1991-1992, pp. 187, 196-202.
Radermacher, et al., “Computer-Assisted Operative Interventions in Orthopedics—Are There Prospects for Endoprosthetics as Well?”, Prac. Ortho., 1997, pp. 149-164, vol. 27, in German.
Radermacher, et al., “Computer-Assisted Planning and Operation in Orthopedics,” Orth. Prac. 36th Year, Dec. 2000, pp. 731-737, English Translation with Certification.
Radermacher, et al., “Surgical Therapy Technology,” Helmholtz-Institut Aaachen Research Report, 1993-1994, pp. 189-219.
Radermacher. et al.. “Computer-Assisted Operative Interventions in Orthopedics—Are There Prospects for Endoprosthetics as Well?”. Prac. Ortho., 1997, pp. 1-17, vol. 27, English Translation with Certification.
Radermacher. et al.. “Computer-Assisted Planning and Operation in Orthopedics,” Orth. Prac. 36th Year, Dec. 2000, pp. 731-737, in German.
Rau, et al., “Small and Neat,” Medical Tech. Int'l, 1993-94, pp. 65, 67 and 69.
Schkommadau, et al., “Clinical Application of Individual Templates for Pedicle Screw Placement in Comparison to Computer Navigation,” Poster presented at CAOS, Feb. 18, 2000, 1 page.
Schkommadau, et al., “Clinical Experience With the Individual Template Technique,” Orth. Prac., 2001, pp. 19-22, vol. 37, No. 1, in German.
Schkommadau, et al., “Clinical Experience With the Individual Template Technique,” Orth. Prac., 2001, pp. 19-22, vol. 37, No. 1, English Translation with Certification.
Seel, et al., “Three-Dimensional Planning and Virtual Radiographs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Jan. 2006, pp. 35-38, No. 442.
Slone, et al., “Body CT: A Practical Approach,” 1999, Title page and Table of Contents pages Only, ISBN 007058219, McGraw-Hill.
Staudte, et al., “Computer-Assisted Operation Planning and Technique in Orthopedics,” North Rhine-Westphalia Acad. for Sciences, Lecture N.444, 2000, 17 pages, ISSN 0944-8799, in German.
Staudte, et al., “Computer-Assisted Operation Planning and Technique in Orthopedics,” North Rhine-Westphalia Acad. for Sciences, Lecture N.444, 2000, 34 pages, ISSN 0944-8799, English Translation with Certification.
Stauffer, et al., “The Macintosh Prosthesis. Prospective Clinical and Gait Evaluation,” Arch. Surg., 1975, pp. 717-720, 110(6).
Stout, et al., “X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide,” 1989, Title page and Table of Contents pages Only, ISBN 0471607118, John Wiley & Sons.
Tamez-Pena, et al., “MRIIsotropic Resolution Reconstruction from Two Orthogonal Scans,” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SOIE-OMT, 2001, pp. 87-97, vol. 4322.
Testi, et al., “Border Tracing Algorithm Implementation for the Femoral Geometry Reconstruction,” Camp. Meth. and Programs in Biomed., 2001, pp. 175-182, vol. 65.
Vandeberg, et al., “Assessment of Knee Cartilage in Cadavers with Dual-Detector Spiral CT Arthrography and MR Imaging,” Radiology, Feb. 2002, pp. 430-435, 222(2).
Wiese, et al., “Biomaterial Properties and Biocompatibility in Cell Culture of a Novel Self-Inflating Hydrogel Tissue Expander,” J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, Nov. 2000, pp. 179-188, 54(2).
Woolson, S., Fellingham, L., Dev, P., and Vassiliadis, A., “Three Dimensional Imaging of Bone from Analysis of Computed Tomography Data.” Orthopedics, vol. 8, No. 10, pp. 1269-1273, Oct. 1985.
Yusof, et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Chitin Beads as a Wound Dressing Precursor,” J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, Oct. 2000, pp. 59-68, 54(1).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180161042 A1 Jun 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61154845 Feb 2009 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14691033 Apr 2015 US
Child 15889540 US
Parent 12711307 Feb 2010 US
Child 14691033 US