The present invention generally relates to surgical guides, and the fixtures used to locate such guides in relation to a patient's body during orthopedic procedures, such as, total knee, hip, or ankle replacement surgery, and methods for designing and using such instrument locators.
Total joint (knee, hip, and ankle) replacement prostheses are known in the art. In many instances, a specially designed jig or fixture enables the surgeon to make accurate and precise bone resections of the femoral surface, the tibial surface, or both in order to accept such prostheses. The ultimate goal with any total joint prosthesis is to approximate the function of the natural, healthy structures that the prosthesis is replacing. Should the prosthesis not be properly attached to the femur, tibia, ankle or foot, any misalignment could result in discomfort to the patient, gate problems, or degradation of the prosthesis.
For example, when attaching a knee prosthesis it is desirable to orient the prosthesis such that the pivot axis of the knee joint lies within a transverse plane that is generally oriented perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. The mechanical axis lies along a line which intersects the femoral head and the center of the ankle. In the prior art, the mechanical axis had been determined from an inspection of a radiograph of the femur to be resected prior to, or even during the surgery. During the actual operation, the mechanical axis was determined by computing its valgus angle from the femoral shaft axis. It was then necessary to manually align any cutting guide and its fixtures with respect to the femoral shaft axis in order to achieve an optimum cut.
Often such cutting guides included a femoral intramedullary stem which was inserted through a pre-drilled passage way formed in the intercondylar notch and upwardly through the femur along the femoral shaft axis. The stem often included a bracket which supports a distal femur cutting guide. The bracket included a first pin which extended through the cutting guide to act as a pivot axis. A second pin was attached to the bracket so as to extend through an arcuate slot in the cutting guide. The cutting guide included pairs of opposing slots formed along its sides which were oriented to be perpendicular to a central axis of symmetry of the cutting guide. When the cutting guide was pivoted, such that the central axis of symmetry lay along the mechanical axis, so as to form the appropriate angle with the femoral shaft axis, the cutting guide slots were positioned to be perpendicular to the mechanical axis. The cutting guide was then locked into the predetermined angle with the femoral shaft axis.
In more recent times, computer-aided design techniques have been coupled with advances in imaging technology to improve joint replacement prostheses and methods. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,735,277, a process of producing an endoprosthesis for use in joint replacement is disclosed in which a reference image for determining contour differences on a femur and a tibia, are obtained by comparing a corrected preoperative image of a damaged knee joint with a postoperative image. This technique is then used as the basis for preparing corresponding femoral and tibial components of an endoprosthesis.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,944,518, a method for making a joint prosthesis is provided in which computed tomography, commonly known as a CAT scan (CT) data from a patient's joint is used to design a prosthesis. The CT data is downloaded into a computer aided design software in order to design at least an attachment part, and possibly a functional part, of the prosthesis. The attachment part can be used to attach or otherwise associate the functional part to the patient's bone.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,692, a method for producing prosthetic bone implants in which imaging technology is used to define hard tissue characteristics (size, shape, porosity, etc.) before a trauma occurs (“pre-trauma” file) by archival use of available imaging techniques (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or the like). Loss of hard tissue is determined by imaging in the locale of the affected tissue after the injury (“post-trauma” file). The physical properties of the customized prosthetic device are specified by comparison of the pre-trauma and post-trauma files to produce a solid model “design” file. This specification may also involve secondary manipulation of the files to assist in surgical implantation and to compensate for anticipated healing process. The design file is mathematically processed to produce a “sliced file” that is then used to direct a manufacturing system to construct a precise replica of the design file in a biocompatible material to produce the implant.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,924, a method for producing endoprosthesis where a data block of a three-dimensional actual model of existing bone structure of a patient is acquired using CT scanning. In a computer, the actual model is subtracted from the data block of an existing or CT scan-generated three-dimensional reference model. Then from the difference, a computer-internal model for the endoprosthesis is formed. The data blocks of the actual model and reference model are converted into the data of a CAD free-form surface geometry.
None of the forgoing methods or devices have adequately provided surgeons with a way to generate patient specific prostheses, surgical instruments, guides, and fixtures, nor have they aided in reducing the number or complexity of the fixtures used to locate resection guides in relation to the patient's body during orthopedic procedures, such as, total knee, hip, or ankle replacement surgery.
A method for forming a resection guide locator is provided that includes generating an anatomically accurate image of a bone, including details regarding its surface topographies. A femoral head, a distal femur, a distal tibia and a proximal tibia are each identified, and five millimeter thick slices are obtained, at three millimeter spacings. Sagittal slices may also be used in connection with the invention at 2 millimeter intervals and essentially zero millimeter spacing. A 2D T1 FSE (T1 weighted fast spin echo) imaging sequence is obtained and then anatomically accurate image is converted to a digital model. A digital representation of a resection guide locator is added to the digital model so as to form a composite digital model. Advantageously, one of the surface topographies is mapped complementarily onto a bone engagement portion of the resection guide locator, which is then manufactured based upon the composite digital model so that a manufactured resection guide locator is formed including the complementary surface topography on a bone engagement portion, and with a receptacle pocket sized to receive a resection guide with a press-fit.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully disclosed in, or rendered obvious by, the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts and further wherein:
This description of preferred embodiments is intended to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings, which are to be considered part of the entire written description of this invention. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features of the invention may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form in the interest of clarity and conciseness. In the description, relative terms such as “horizontal,” “vertical,” “up,” “down,” “top” and “bottom” as well as derivatives thereof (e.g., “horizontally,” “downwardly,” “upwardly,” etc.) should be construed to refer to the orientation as then described or as shown in the drawing figure under discussion. These relative terms are for convenience of description and normally are not intended to require a particular orientation. Terms including “inwardly” versus “outwardly,” “longitudinal” versus “lateral” and the like are to be interpreted relative to one another or relative to an axis of elongation, or an axis or center of rotation, as appropriate. Terms concerning attachments, coupling and the like, such as “connected” and “interconnected,” refer to a relationship wherein structures are secured or attached to one another either directly or indirectly through intervening structures, as well as both movable or rigid attachments or relationships, unless expressly described otherwise. When only a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein. The term “operatively connected” is such an attachment, coupling or connection that allows the pertinent structures to operate as intended by virtue of that relationship. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses, if used, are intended to cover the structures described, suggested, or rendered obvious by the written description or drawings for performing the recited function, including not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures.
The present invention provides custom manufactured surgical instruments, guides, and fixtures that are based upon a patient's anatomy as determined by a computer tomography scanner (CT), magnetic resonance imaging machine (MRI), or the like medical imaging technology. For example, a CT or MRI scanned image 1 or series of images may be taken of a patient's knee 1, including portions of the limb from the pelvis or the foot (
The methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,768,134, issued to Swaelens et al., and incorporated herein by reference, have been found to yield adequate conversions of CT or MRI scanned image data 1 to solid computer model 3 usable with the present invention. In some embodiments, images are made of a lower limb, i.e., the pelvis, femur, patella, tibia, and/or foot of a patient using a CT or MRI machine, or other digital image capturing and processing unit (
With one embodiment of the invention scanned images of a diseased knee or ankle joint, including adjoining portions of the femur 5 and tibia 6, were generated using a Hitachi 0.3T Airis Elite open MRI. The Hitachi device comprises an asymmetric two-post open architecture, and provides a 0.3T magnetic field strength in a vertical orientation with high homogeneity. For example, scanned images of a diseased knee joint suitable for use in connection with the present invention incorporated sagittal slices of the knee using the patient's patella and tibial tubercle as anatomic landmarks. Two millimeter thickness slices, at zero millimeter slice spacing were gathered with the scan boundaries defining an approximate field of view of twelve centimeters proximal and nine centimeters distal of the joint line or the extent of the knee coil. A standard multiple array extremity coil was utilized with imaging set for bright cartilage and dark bone with crisp boundaries. The patient was placed with the leg to be scanned in the middle of the coil. It will be understood that in bilateral cases each leg would be scanned separately.
In addition to the forgoing parameters, when generating scanned images of a patient's knee for use in connection with the present invention, it is often preferable to acquire a FATSEP 3D RSSG imaging sequence with the parameters listed in the Table 1 below. For preferred results, very clear boundaries should be determined between the cartilage and surrounding soft tissues, and the cartilage and bone. The cartilage will often present a bright signal and the bone a dark signal, allowing clear contrast between the two materials.
Scanned images (axial slices) of femur 5 and tibia 6 associated with a diseased knee may also be generated utilizing the rapid body coil of the Hitachi 0.3T Airis Elite open MRI. Anatomic landmarks found to be useful for these scans included the femoral head and distal femur as well as the distal tibia and proximal tibia. Five millimeter thick slices, at three millimeter spacing provided preferred results with the present invention. Preferred scan boundaries included the proximal femoral head through distal femur and the most proximal tibial point through most distal tibial point, e.g., the ankle joint. The patient may be placed with leg to be scanned in the middle of the coil, it again being understood that in bilateral cases each leg would be scanned separately.
The field of view available from the rapid body coil may not always cover the entire femur or tibia within one scan. In such instances, the femur or tibia may be scanned in two separate regions. Between the two scans the patient will have to move in order to reposition the coil to cover the most proximal or distal regions of interest. It is important in such instances to provide as much overlap as possible between the two scans. The patient's leg should be placed in the middle of the coil to ensure the largest field of view possible without distortion. The corners of the images at the field of view limits of the coil are susceptible distortion. The patient's legs should be scanned separately, as bilateral scans place the proximal and distal ends of the knee joint region within the field of view limitation and within areas of possible distortion. Additionally, a 2D T1 FSE (T1 weighted fast spin echo) imaging sequence may be acquired with the parameters listed in the Table 1. It should be noted that the boundaries of the bone, from the ball of the femoral head down to the distal condyles, should be clear for processing.
In accordance with the present invention, interactive processing and preparation of the digitized image data is performed which includes the manipulation and introduction of additional extrinsic digital information 8, such as, predefined reference locations 9 for component positioning and alignment 10 so that adjustments to the surgical site, that will require resection during surgery, may be planned and mapped onto computer model 3 (
For example, when the system of the present invention is used for knee replacement surgery, a digital representation of a femoral resection guide mount 20 may be added to the patient's image data model (
Referring to
Guide receptacle 29 includes a pair of wings 44,46 that project outwardly, in opposite directions from base 33 and in spaced relation to arms 30,31. Each wing 44, 46 includes a pylon 48 projecting upwardly to support guide housing 49 such that an elongate slot 52 is defined between base 33 and guide housing 49. Slot 52 is sized and shaped to allow a typical surgical saw, of the type often used for bone resection, to pass through from a correspondingly positioned and sized slot in resection guide 26 without contact, or with only incidental contact with resection guide locator 20. An annular wall 55, having a shape that is complementary to the outer profile of femoral resection guide 26, projects outwardly in substantially perpendicular relation to a back wall 61 and thereby defines a recess 58. In some preferred embodiments, recess 58 is sized so as to accept femoral resection guide 26 with a “press-fit”. By press-fit it should be understood that annular wall 55 is sufficiently resilient to deflect or compress elastically so as to store elastic energy when femoral resection guide 26 is pushed into recess 58. Of course, it will also be understood that femoral resection guide 26 will have an outer circumferential shape that is complementary to the circumferential shape of recess 58, but slightly larger in size, for press-fit embodiments. Also, femoral resection guide 26 may be retained within recess 58 by only frictional engagement with annular wall 55 or, in less preferred embodiments, resection guide 26 can simply slide into recess 58 without operative contact or only incidental engagement with annular wall 55. First through-bores 62, 64 are defined in back wall 61 in spaced relation to one another, with a second through-bore 67,69 being associated with each first through-bore 62,64. In the embodiment shown in
Referring to
Guide receptacle 79 includes a pair of wings 84, 86 that project outwardly, in opposite directions from base 83 and in spaced relation to arms 80,81. Each wing 84,86 includes a pylon 88 projecting upwardly to support guide housing 89 such that an elongate slot 94 is defined between base 83 and guide housing 89. Slot 94 is sized and shaped to allow a typical surgical saw, of the type often used for bone resection, to pass through from a correspondingly positioned and sized slot in resection guide 28 without contact, or with only incidental contact with resection guide locator 22. An annular wall 95, having a shape that is complementary to the outer profile of tibial resection guide 28, projects outwardly in substantially perpendicular relation to a back wall 101 and thereby defines a recess 108. Recess 108 is sized so as to accept tibial resection guide 28 with a press-fit. First through-bores 112, 114 are defined in back wall 101 in spaced relation to one another, with a second through-bore 117, 119 being associated with each first through-bore 112, 114.
Returning to the digital image models 3 previously disclosed, and considering a generalized digital model of resection guide mount 20 added to the patient's femur image data, the anatomic surface features of the patient's femur, e.g., the condylar surface topography, may be complementarily mapped onto each of lower surface 36 and lower surface 40 of arms 30, 31. It will be understood that complementary mapping of the digital images results in localized prominences on the surface of a bone, e.g., a condyle or articular surface, becoming localized concavities on lower surface 36 or lower surface 40, while localized concavities on the surface of a bone become localized prominences on lower surface 36 or lower surface 40. In this way, each of lower surface 36 and lower surface 40 is redefined with a complementary, substantially mirror image of the anatomic surface features of a selected region of the patient's femur. As a consequence of this complementary bone surface mapping, resection guide mount 20 releasably “locks” on to the complementary topography of the corresponding portion of the patient's natural femur, e.g., the condylar surfaces, without the need for other external or internal guidance fixtures. A substantially identical mapping is carried out in connection with the design of a patient specific tibial resection guide mount 22.
A visual presentation of the virtual alignment results between the patient's femur and resection guide mount 20 is created and forwarded to the surgeon to obtain approval of the results prior to manufacturing (
During a total knee replacement the present invention is used in the following manner. The surgeon first orients resection guide mount 20 on femur 5 until lower surfaces 36, 40 of resection guide mount 20 “lock” to the topography of the exposed surface 4 of femur 5. With resection guide mount 20 locked onto the patient's femur, a surgeon press-fits an appropriately configured Distal Resection Guide 26 (e.g. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Part No. K001-2659) in recess 58 of resection guide mount 20. As indicated in
It is to be understood that the present invention is by no means limited only to the particular constructions herein disclosed and shown in the drawings, but also comprises any modifications or equivalents within the scope of the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/691,033, filed Apr. 20, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,883,870), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/711,307 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,113,914), which was filed Feb. 24, 2010 claiming the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/154,845, filed Feb. 24, 2009, the entireties of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3314420 | Smith et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3605123 | Hahn | Sep 1971 | A |
3798679 | Ewald | Mar 1974 | A |
3808606 | Tronzo | May 1974 | A |
3843975 | Tronzo | Oct 1974 | A |
3855638 | Pilliar | Dec 1974 | A |
3938198 | Kahn et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3987499 | Scharbach et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4052753 | Dedo | Oct 1977 | A |
4055862 | Farling | Nov 1977 | A |
4085466 | Goodfellow et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4098626 | Graham et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4203444 | Bonnell et al. | May 1980 | A |
4213816 | Morris | Jul 1980 | A |
4340978 | Buechel et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4368040 | Weissman | Jan 1983 | A |
4436684 | White | Mar 1984 | A |
4501266 | McDaniel | Feb 1985 | A |
4502161 | Wall | Mar 1985 | A |
4586496 | Keller | May 1986 | A |
4594380 | Chapin et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4601290 | Effron et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4609551 | Caplan et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4627853 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4703751 | Pohl | Nov 1987 | A |
4704686 | Aldinger | Nov 1987 | A |
4715860 | Amstutz et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4721104 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4759350 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4769040 | Wevers | Sep 1988 | A |
4841975 | Woolson | Jun 1989 | A |
4846835 | Grande | Jul 1989 | A |
4865607 | Witzel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4880429 | Stone | Nov 1989 | A |
4936862 | Walker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4979949 | Matsen, III et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5002547 | Poggie et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5041138 | Vacanti et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5059216 | Winters | Oct 1991 | A |
5067964 | Richmond et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5122144 | Bert et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129908 | Petersen | Jul 1992 | A |
5133759 | Turner | Jul 1992 | A |
5154717 | Matsen, III et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162430 | Rhee et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171322 | Kenny | Dec 1992 | A |
5197985 | Caplan et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5206023 | Hunziker | Apr 1993 | A |
5226914 | Caplan et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234433 | Bert et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250050 | Poggie et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258032 | Bertin | Oct 1993 | A |
5270300 | Hunziker | Dec 1993 | A |
5288797 | Khalil et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5303148 | Mattson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306311 | Stone et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314482 | Goodfellow et al. | May 1994 | A |
5344459 | Swartz | Sep 1994 | A |
5360446 | Kennedy | Nov 1994 | A |
5365996 | Crook | Nov 1994 | A |
5368858 | Hunziker | Nov 1994 | A |
5370692 | Fink et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380332 | Ferrante | Jan 1995 | A |
5387216 | Thornhill et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5454816 | Ashby | Oct 1995 | A |
5462550 | Dietz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5468787 | Braden et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474559 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5478739 | Slivka et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486180 | Dietz et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5501687 | Willert et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503162 | Athanasiou et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523843 | Yamane et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540696 | Booth, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542947 | Treacy | Aug 1996 | A |
5554190 | Draenert | Sep 1996 | A |
5556432 | Kubein-Meesenburg et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5571205 | James | Nov 1996 | A |
5575793 | Carls et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578037 | Sanders et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5593450 | Scott et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597379 | Haines et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601563 | Burke et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613970 | Houston et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616146 | Murray | Apr 1997 | A |
5630820 | Todd | May 1997 | A |
5632745 | Schwartz | Jul 1997 | A |
5658290 | Techeira | Aug 1997 | A |
5649929 | Callaway | Sep 1997 | A |
5671741 | Lang et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682886 | Delp et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683466 | Vitale | Nov 1997 | A |
5684562 | Fujieda | Nov 1997 | A |
5688282 | Baron et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5728162 | Eckhoff | Mar 1998 | A |
5735277 | Schuster | Apr 1998 | A |
5749874 | Schwartz | May 1998 | A |
5749876 | Duvillier et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765561 | Chen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768134 | Swaelens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769899 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5786217 | Tuba et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5798924 | Eufinger et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800438 | Tuke et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824083 | Draenert | Oct 1998 | A |
5827289 | Reiley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830216 | Insall et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835619 | Morimoto et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842477 | Naughton et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847804 | Sarver et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853746 | Hunziker | Dec 1998 | A |
5860981 | Bertin et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871018 | Delp et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871542 | Goodfellow et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871546 | Colleran et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879390 | Kubein-Meesenburg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880976 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885296 | Masini | Mar 1999 | A |
5885297 | Matsen, III | Mar 1999 | A |
5885298 | Herrington et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897559 | Masini | Apr 1999 | A |
5899859 | Votruba et al. | May 1999 | A |
5900245 | Sawhney et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906934 | Grande et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911723 | Ashby et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916220 | Masini | Jun 1999 | A |
5939323 | Valentini et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961523 | Masini | Oct 1999 | A |
5968051 | Luckman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972385 | Liu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995738 | DiGioia, III et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001895 | Harvey et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002859 | DiGioia, III et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006126 | Cosman | Dec 1999 | A |
6007537 | Burkinshaw et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010509 | Delgado et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013081 | Burkinshaw et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013103 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6046379 | Stone et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056754 | Haines et al. | May 2000 | A |
6056756 | Eng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6057927 | Levesque et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077270 | Katz | Jun 2000 | A |
6082364 | Balian et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090144 | Letot et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093204 | Stone | Jul 2000 | A |
6096043 | Techiera et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102916 | Masini | Aug 2000 | A |
6106529 | Techiera | Aug 2000 | A |
6110209 | Stone | Aug 2000 | A |
6120541 | Johnson | Sep 2000 | A |
6126690 | Ateshian et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139578 | Lee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156069 | Amstutz | Dec 2000 | A |
6161080 | Aouni-Ateshian et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6187010 | Masini | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200606 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203546 | MacMahon | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203576 | Afriat et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205411 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206927 | Fell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214369 | Grande et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217894 | Sawhney et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219571 | Hargreaves et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224632 | Pappas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235060 | Kubein-Meesenburg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251143 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254639 | Peckitt | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277151 | Lee et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281195 | Rueger et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283980 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296646 | Williamson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299905 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322588 | Ogle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327491 | Franklin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328765 | Hardwick et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344043 | Pappas | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6344059 | Krakovits et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352558 | Spector | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358253 | Torrie et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365405 | Salzmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371958 | Overaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373250 | Tsoref et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375658 | Hangody et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379367 | Vibe-Hansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382028 | Wooh et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6383228 | Schmotzer | May 2002 | B1 |
6387131 | Miehlke et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6429013 | Halvorsen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443988 | Felt et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6443991 | Running | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444222 | Asculai et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458135 | Harwin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459927 | Franklin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459948 | Ateshian et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468314 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6478799 | Williamson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479996 | Hoogeveen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510334 | Schuster et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520964 | Tallarida et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6558421 | Fell et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560476 | Pelletier et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575980 | Robie et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6620168 | Lombardo et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626945 | Simon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626948 | Storer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632225 | Sanford et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6632235 | Weikel et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652587 | Felt et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673077 | Katz | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679917 | Ek | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6712856 | Carignan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6738657 | Franklin et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6905514 | Carignan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916341 | Rolston | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928742 | Broers et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932842 | Litschko et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6942667 | Song | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6944518 | Roose | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6969393 | Pinczewski et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980849 | Sasso | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6988015 | Schopf et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993374 | Sasso | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008430 | Dong et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7058439 | Eaton et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060074 | Rosa et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7104997 | Lionberger et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115131 | Engh et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7117027 | Zheng et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7141053 | Rosa et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7184814 | Lang et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7201762 | Green, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7217276 | Henderson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7239908 | Alexander et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7245697 | Lang | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7282054 | Steffensmeier et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292674 | Lang | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7347690 | Jordan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7364581 | Michalowicz | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377924 | Raistrick et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379529 | Lang | May 2008 | B2 |
7467892 | Lang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468075 | Lang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7534263 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7618451 | Berez et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7747305 | Dean et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7806896 | Bonutti | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7881768 | Lang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7981158 | Fitz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983777 | Melton et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8036729 | Lang et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8062302 | Lang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066708 | Lang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083745 | Lang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8105330 | Fitz et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8112142 | Alexander et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8122592 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
RE43282 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2012 | E |
8715362 | Reiley et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010001120 | Masini | May 2001 | A1 |
20010010023 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010039455 | Simon et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020013626 | Geisllich et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029038 | Haines | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045940 | Giannelli et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059049 | Bradbury et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068979 | Brown et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072821 | Baker | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079601 | Russell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082703 | Repicci | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087274 | Alexander et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106625 | Hung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115647 | Halvorsen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120274 | Overaker et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120281 | Overaker | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123817 | Clasbrummel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020127264 | Felt et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133230 | Repicci | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143402 | Steinberg | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151986 | Asculai et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156150 | Asculai et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156479 | Schulzki et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173852 | Felt et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183850 | Felt et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198531 | Millard et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030028196 | Bonutti | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055500 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055501 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055502 | Lang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060882 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060883 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060884 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060885 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030100907 | Rosa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100953 | Rosa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120347 | Steinberg | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030158558 | Horn | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158606 | Coon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163137 | Smucker et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030173695 | Monkhouse et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030216669 | Lang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225457 | Justin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236521 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040098133 | Carignan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102852 | Johnson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122521 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133276 | Lang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138754 | Lang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147927 | Tsougarakis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153079 | Tsougarakis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153162 | Sanford et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153164 | Sanford et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167390 | Alexander et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167630 | Rolston | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193280 | Webster et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204644 | Tsougarakis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204760 | Fitz et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230197 | Tornier et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236424 | Berez | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249386 | Faoro | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015153 | Goble et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021039 | Cusick et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050043807 | Wood | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049603 | Calton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055028 | Haines | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085920 | Williamson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107883 | Goodfried et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107884 | Johnson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119664 | Carignan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143745 | Hodorek et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148843 | Roose | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171545 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171612 | Rolston | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192588 | Garcia | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216305 | Funderud | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234461 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267584 | Burdulis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060052795 | Burdulis et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060111722 | Bouadi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060149283 | May et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200162 | Farling et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235421 | Rosa et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070015995 | Lang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070073305 | Lionberger et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070118141 | Marchyn et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070198022 | Lang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203430 | Lang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233151 | Chudik | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233156 | Metzger | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070276224 | Lang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070293868 | Delfosse et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004709 | O'Neill et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015433 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025463 | Lang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031412 | Delfosse et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058613 | Lang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058945 | Hajaj et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080114370 | Schoenefeld | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161815 | Schoenefeld et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170659 | Lang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195216 | Lang | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219412 | Lang | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243127 | Lang | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275452 | Lang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281328 | Lang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281329 | Lang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281426 | Fitz et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287953 | Sers | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090024131 | Metzger et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076371 | Lang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087276 | Rose | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088753 | Aram et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088758 | Bennett | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088763 | Aram et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099567 | Zajac | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131941 | Park et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131942 | Aker et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138020 | Park et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090222014 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090307893 | Bojarski et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100160917 | Fitz et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100262150 | Lian | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281678 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298894 | Bojarski et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305573 | Fitz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100305574 | Fitz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110066193 | Lang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071581 | Lang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110213368 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213373 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213374 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213377 | Lang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213427 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213428 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213429 | Lang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213430 | Lang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213431 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218539 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218584 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230888 | Lang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238073 | Lang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110313423 | Lang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319897 | Lang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319900 | Lang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029520 | Lang et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041446 | Wong et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066892 | Lang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071881 | Lang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071882 | Lang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071883 | Lang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072185 | Lang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101503 | Lang et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120143197 | Lang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151730 | Fitz et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158001 | Burdulis, Jr. et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101111197 | Jan 2008 | CN |
2306552 | Aug 1974 | DE |
3516743 | Nov 1986 | DE |
44 34 539 | Apr 1996 | DE |
20303498 | Aug 2003 | DE |
0377901 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0528080 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0530804 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0626156 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0704193 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0896825 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0613380 | Dec 1999 | EP |
0993807 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1074229 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1077253 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1120087 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1129675 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1132061 | Sep 2001 | EP |
0732091 | Dec 2001 | EP |
0814731 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1234552 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1234555 | Aug 2002 | EP |
0809987 | Oct 2002 | EP |
0833620 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2819714 | Jul 2002 | FR |
1451283 | Sep 1976 | GB |
2291355 | Jan 1996 | GB |
2348373 | Oct 2000 | GB |
8-173465 | Jul 1996 | JP |
9-206322 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2002-102236 | Apr 2002 | JP |
WO 8702882 | May 1987 | WO |
WO 90009769 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 93004710 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO 93009819 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 93025157 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 95027450 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 95028688 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 95030390 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 95032623 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 96024302 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 97025942 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 97026847 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 97027885 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 97038676 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 98012994 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9820816 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 98030617 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9832384 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 99002654 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 99008598 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 99008728 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 99042061 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 99047186 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 99051719 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 99056674 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 00009179 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 00015153 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 00035346 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 00048550 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 00059411 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 00074554 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 01010356 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 01017463 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 01019254 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 01035968 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 01045764 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 01068800 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 01070142 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 01091672 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02000270 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02000275 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02002158 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02022013 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02022014 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02023483 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02034310 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02036147 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02096268 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03007788 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03037192 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03047470 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03051210 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03055400 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 04043305 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 04049981 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 05051239 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 05051240 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 06060795 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 06127283 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 07041375 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 07092841 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 08112996 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 08157412 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009001083 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 09111639 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2010099142 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 10121147 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2007061983 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011110374 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Andersson, et al., “Macintosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Acta. Orthrop. Scand., 1974, pp. 245-259, 45(2). |
Argenson, et al., “Is There a Place for Patellofemoral Arthroplasty?,”Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 321, 1995, pp. 162-167. |
Birnbaum, et al., “Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery with Individual Templates and Comparison to Conventional Operation Method,” Spine, Feb. 2001, pp. 365-369, vol. 26, No. 4. |
Chelule, et al., “Computer Aided Design of Personalized Jigs in Total Knee Replacement,” 3rd Annual Meeting of CAOS Int'l Proc., Jun. 18-21, 2003, pp. 58-59, Spain. |
Dare, S. et al., “Use of Computerized Tomography and Numerical Control Machining for the Fabrication of Custom Arthroplasty Prostheses.” Second World Congress on Biomaterials, 10th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, p. 233, Washington, D.C., Apr. 27-May 1, 1984. |
De Winter, et al., “The Richards Type II Patellofemoral Arthroplasty,” Acta Orthop Scand, 2001, pp. 487-490, 72(5). |
Delp, et al., “A Graphics-Based Software System to Develop and Analyze Models of Musculoskeletal Structures,” Comput. Biol. Med., 1995, pp. 21-34, vol. 25, No. 1. |
Farrar, et al., “Computed Tomography Scan Scout Film for Measurement of Femoral Axis in Knee Arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, 1999, pp. 1030-1031, vol. 14, No. 8. |
First Office Action for Japanese Patent Appln. No. 2011-552091, dated Oct. 25, 2013. |
Froemel, et al., “Computer Assisted Template Based Navigation for Total Knee Replacement,” Documents presented at CAOS on Jun. 17, 2001, 4 pages. |
Hafez, et al., “Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Could a Two-Piece Custom Template Replace the Complex Conventional Instrumentations?”, 4th Annual Meeting of CAOS Int'l Proc., Jun. 16-19, 2004, pp. 63-64, Chicago. |
Hafez, et al., “Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Present and the Future,” Future Rheumatol., 2006, pp. 121-131, vol. 1. |
Kim, et al., “Measurement of Femoral Neck Anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D Imaging Method,” Med. and Biol. Eng. and Computing, 2000, pp. 603-609, vol. 38, No. 6. |
Lam, et al., “X-Ray Diagnosis: A Physician's Approach,” 1998, Title page and Table of Contents pages Only, ISBN 9813083247, Springer-Verlag publishers. |
Lam. et al.. “VarusNalgus Alignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty,” The Knee, 2003, pp. 237-241, vol. 10. |
Lu, et al., “In Vitro Degradation of Porous poly(L-lactic acid) Foams,” Biomaterials, Aug. 2000, pp. 1595-1605, 21(15). |
Marler, et al., “Soft-Tissue Augmentation with Injectable Alginate and Synegeneic Fibroblasts,” Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, May 2000 pp. 2049-2058, 105(6). |
PCT/US2010/025143, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Sep. 9, 2011. |
Portheine, “Model-Based Operation Planning in Orthopedic Surgery,” Thesis, Apr. 22, 2004, 90 pages, RWTH Aachen University, in German. |
Portheine, “Model-Based Operation Planning in Orthopedic Surgery,” Thesis, Apr. 22, 2004, 170 pages, RWTH Aachen University, English Translation with Certification. |
Portheine, et al., “Potentials of CT-based Planning and Template-based Procedure in Hip and Knee Surgery,” Orth. Prac., 2000, pp. 786-791, vol. 36, English Translation with Certification. |
Portheine. et al.. “Potentials of CT-based Planning and Template-based Procedure in Hip and Knee Surgery,” Orth. Prac., 2000, pp. 786-791, vol. 36, in German. |
Radermacher, “Computer Assisted Matching of Planning and Execution in Orthopedic Surgery,” Slide Presentation, Nov. 29, 1993, 22 pages. |
Radermacher, “Computer-Based Decision Support in the Selection and Evaluation of Contact Surfaces for Manual Referencing,” Lecture presented at Helmholtz Meeting '98 and OSS '98, 7 pages, in German. |
Radermacher, “Computer-Based Decision Support in the Selection and Evaluation of Contact Surfaces for Manual Referencing,” Lecture presented at Helmholtz Meeting '98 and OSS '98, 8 pages, English Translation with Certifications. |
Radermacher, “Image Guided Orthopedic Surgery with Individual Templates,” Helmholtz-Institute for Biomed. Eng., 1997, 2 pages. |
Radermacher, “Template Based Navigation—An Efficient Technique for Hip and Knee Surgery,” CAOS First Asian Meet, Mar. 27-28, 2004, pp. 45-50, India. |
Radermacher, et al., “Computer Assisted Matching of Planning and Execution in Orthopedic Surgery,” IEEE, EMBS, 1993, pp. 946-947, San Diego. |
Radermacher, et al., “Computer Integrated Advanced Orthopedics (CIAO),” 2nd European Conference on Eng. and Med., Apr. 26, 1993, 12 pages. |
Radermacher, et al., “Computer Integrated Surgery—Connecting Planning and Execution of Surgical Intervention in Orthopedics,” Surgical Therapy Technology, Helmholtz-Institut Aachen Research Report, 1991-1992, pp. 187, 196-202. |
Radermacher, et al., “Computer-Assisted Operative Interventions in Orthopedics—Are There Prospects for Endoprosthetics as Well?”, Prac. Ortho., 1997, pp. 149-164, vol. 27, in German. |
Radermacher, et al., “Computer-Assisted Planning and Operation in Orthopedics,” Orth. Prac. 36th Year, Dec. 2000, pp. 731-737, English Translation with Certification. |
Radermacher, et al., “Surgical Therapy Technology,” Helmholtz-Institut Aaachen Research Report, 1993-1994, pp. 189-219. |
Radermacher. et al.. “Computer-Assisted Operative Interventions in Orthopedics—Are There Prospects for Endoprosthetics as Well?”. Prac. Ortho., 1997, pp. 1-17, vol. 27, English Translation with Certification. |
Radermacher. et al.. “Computer-Assisted Planning and Operation in Orthopedics,” Orth. Prac. 36th Year, Dec. 2000, pp. 731-737, in German. |
Rau, et al., “Small and Neat,” Medical Tech. Int'l, 1993-94, pp. 65, 67 and 69. |
Schkommadau, et al., “Clinical Application of Individual Templates for Pedicle Screw Placement in Comparison to Computer Navigation,” Poster presented at CAOS, Feb. 18, 2000, 1 page. |
Schkommadau, et al., “Clinical Experience With the Individual Template Technique,” Orth. Prac., 2001, pp. 19-22, vol. 37, No. 1, in German. |
Schkommadau, et al., “Clinical Experience With the Individual Template Technique,” Orth. Prac., 2001, pp. 19-22, vol. 37, No. 1, English Translation with Certification. |
Seel, et al., “Three-Dimensional Planning and Virtual Radiographs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Jan. 2006, pp. 35-38, No. 442. |
Slone, et al., “Body CT: A Practical Approach,” 1999, Title page and Table of Contents pages Only, ISBN 007058219, McGraw-Hill. |
Staudte, et al., “Computer-Assisted Operation Planning and Technique in Orthopedics,” North Rhine-Westphalia Acad. for Sciences, Lecture N.444, 2000, 17 pages, ISSN 0944-8799, in German. |
Staudte, et al., “Computer-Assisted Operation Planning and Technique in Orthopedics,” North Rhine-Westphalia Acad. for Sciences, Lecture N.444, 2000, 34 pages, ISSN 0944-8799, English Translation with Certification. |
Stauffer, et al., “The Macintosh Prosthesis. Prospective Clinical and Gait Evaluation,” Arch. Surg., 1975, pp. 717-720, 110(6). |
Stout, et al., “X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide,” 1989, Title page and Table of Contents pages Only, ISBN 0471607118, John Wiley & Sons. |
Tamez-Pena, et al., “MRIIsotropic Resolution Reconstruction from Two Orthogonal Scans,” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SOIE-OMT, 2001, pp. 87-97, vol. 4322. |
Testi, et al., “Border Tracing Algorithm Implementation for the Femoral Geometry Reconstruction,” Camp. Meth. and Programs in Biomed., 2001, pp. 175-182, vol. 65. |
Vandeberg, et al., “Assessment of Knee Cartilage in Cadavers with Dual-Detector Spiral CT Arthrography and MR Imaging,” Radiology, Feb. 2002, pp. 430-435, 222(2). |
Wiese, et al., “Biomaterial Properties and Biocompatibility in Cell Culture of a Novel Self-Inflating Hydrogel Tissue Expander,” J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, Nov. 2000, pp. 179-188, 54(2). |
Woolson, S., Fellingham, L., Dev, P., and Vassiliadis, A., “Three Dimensional Imaging of Bone from Analysis of Computed Tomography Data.” Orthopedics, vol. 8, No. 10, pp. 1269-1273, Oct. 1985. |
Yusof, et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Chitin Beads as a Wound Dressing Precursor,” J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, Oct. 2000, pp. 59-68, 54(1). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180161042 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61154845 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14691033 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15889540 | US | |
Parent | 12711307 | Feb 2010 | US |
Child | 14691033 | US |