Method for Increasing Shelf Life of Baked Goods

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20120009319
  • Publication Number
    20120009319
  • Date Filed
    September 21, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Published
    January 12, 2012
    13 years ago
Abstract
The invention provides a method of reducing moisture loss and a method of reducing shrinkage in a frozen baked good. Each method comprises preparing a baked good comprising a pre-gelatinized modified granular starch and freezing the baked good, the starch being present in said baked good in an amount effective to reduce moisture loss or shrinkage upon freezing relative to the absence of the starch.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention pertains to a method of preparing a frozen baked good.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Modified food starches, particularly pre-gelatinized modified food starches, have been used for many years in bakery applications to improve shelf-life. Modified pre-gelatinized food starches have been the most successful in improving the shelf-life of cakes that contain a greater amount of sugar than flour (i.e., “high-ratio” cakes) by improving moisture retention and textural properties of the cake at room temperature. For example, Karaoglu, et al., Starch/Starke, 53, 162-169 (2001) describes the effects of using modified food starches on cake quality. Using four different starches, the Karaoglu reference demonstrates that a 10% level of pre-gelatinized starch improved cake volume and delayed staling at room temperature for seven days. In addition, Belshaw, Cereal Foods World, 25, 648 (1980) discloses a study in which 4% of a drum dried modified starch improved the 48-hour shelf-life of high-ratio cakes. The use of pre-gelatinized waxy maize starches in cakes has also been demonstrated to increase cake batter viscosity and moisture retention (see, e.g., National Starch and Chemical, “Light cakes and crunchy snacks—Manipulating the moisture in bakery products,” Innovations in Food Technology, 2001). Lorenz and Kulp, Cereal Chem., 58, 49-52 (1981), describe the use of heat-treated potato and wheat starches in high-ratio yellow cakes to improve cake volume and texture. Similarly, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,157,406 and 4,259,362 disclose improved cake properties as a result of using heat-treated starch with intact granules in cake formulations. The use of these currently available pre-gelatinized modified food starches in baked goods subject to freezing, however, typically results in severe cake shrinkage and moisture loss.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a method of reducing moisture loss in a frozen baked good, which method comprises preparing a baked good comprising a pre-gelatinized (i.e., pre-swollen granules but still retaining a granular structure) modified granular dent corn starch and freezing the baked good, said starch being present in said baked good in an amount effective to reduce moisture loss upon freezing relative to the absence of said starch. The invention also provides a method of reducing shrinkage of a frozen baked good, which method comprises preparing a baked good comprising a pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch and freezing the baked good, said starch being present in said baked good in an amount effective to reduce shrinkage upon freezing relative to the absence of said starch. The preferred starch is a granular, pre-gelatinized hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate. Frozen baked goods made in accordance with this method also are encompassed by the invention.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The starches used in conjunction with the invention may be selected from among the hydroxypropyl, acetyl, and octenyl succinate derivatized starches, with hydroxypropyl starches being preferred. The starches may be derivatized to any suitable degree of substitution (DS). Generally, the starches of the invention should be crosslinked using any suitable crosslinking agent. Preferably, the starch is a non-waxy starch, most preferably a dent corn starch. In accordance with highly preferred embodiments of the invention, the starch is not a drum-dried starch, but is a cold-water swelling granular starch. The starch generally is prepared by providing an aqueous slurry of the starch (preferably a slightly acidic or basic slurry) and spray-cooking the starch under conditions of moisture and heat sufficient to swell the starch granules, but wherein the starch remains substantially completely in granular form, i.e., wherein a majority and preferably substantially all of the starch granules remain intact. The starch preferably is not prepared using an alcohol-swelling process.


The invention provides a method of reducing moisture loss and a method reducing shrinkage in a frozen baked good. Each method comprises preparing a baked good which comprises a pre-gelatinized (i.e., pre-swollen granules but still retaining a granular structure) modified granular dent corn starch, and freezing the baked good. Any suitable pre-gelatinized modified granular starch can be used in connection with the inventive method. The preferred pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch used in the inventive method preferably is a hydroxyalkyl starch (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,700 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/863,928 both of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties), and more preferably is a hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate. Desirably, the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch is a modified food starch available under the trademark INSCOSITY® B658 or B656 from Grain Processing Corporation (Muscatine, IA). The INSCOSITY® starches are pre-gelatinized, yet they maintain their granular structure. By this it is contemplated that the starch granules are swollen and are generally translucent or semi-translucent. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that such starches may be made via known methods. The INSCOSITY® starch itself is not the invention. Other food-grade modified pre-gelatinized cross-linked starches may be used in connection with the invention.


INSCOSITY® B656 and B658 also have a lower viscosity than most modified waxy-maize pre-gelatinized starches, allowing the baked good manufacturer to add greater amounts of starch to a particular formulation without adverse effects. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that high batter viscosities typically produce inferior crumb structure (e.g., excessive tunneling or large holes), which leads to toughness, a rubbery cake texture, and can ultimately increase moisture loss in the cake.


The pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch may be used in connection with other ingredients, including surfactants, polymers, fillers, and other ingredients as may be desired in a frozen baked good application. As surfactants, it is contemplated that those such as mono- and di-glycerides, di-acetyl tartaric esters of fatty acids, propylene glycol mono- and di-esters of fatty acids, polysorbate 60, calcium or sodium stearoyl 2 lactylate, lactyl stearate, sodium stearoyl fumarate, succinylate monoglycerides, ethoxylated mono- and di-glycerides, and the like may be used. In certain applications, the starch may be used in conjunction with other natural polymers such as gums, cellulose derivatives, starch derivatives, starch hydrolysis products, microorganism products, or with food-grade synthetic polymers. Surfactants, polymers, and fillers can be included in the baked good in any suitable amounts. For example, the baked good desirably comprises about 0.1% w/w to about 5% w/w surfactant, about 0.05% w/w to about 2% w/w polymer, and about 0.1% w/w to about 15% w/w filler.


The baked good can be prepared using any suitable method known in the art. Generally a batter is prepared and baked, and the baked product may be subsequentially modified (e.g. by adding frosting). When preparing the baked good, the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch is included in the baked good formulation in any suitable amount, but preferably in an amount effective to reduce moisture loss and/or shrinkage of the baked good when frozen. In this respect, the baked good desirably comprises about 0.5% w/w to about 10% w/w (e.g., about 1% w/w, about 5% w/w, or about 8% w/w) of the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch. Most preferably, the baked good comprises about 0.75% w/w to about 1% w/w (e.g., about 0.8% w/w, about 0.9% w/w, or bout 0.95% w/w) of the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch.


Following preparation of the baked good comprising a pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch, the baked good is frozen. The baked good can be frozen under normal conditions or can be flash-frozen. The baked good typically is maintained at a temperature of about 0° C. or less (e.g., about −2° C. or less, about −5° C. or less, or about −10° C. or less). The baked good can be frozen for any desired amount of time. Preferably, the baked good is frozen for at least about 2 months or more (e.g., about 3 months, about 5 months, or about 7 months). Ideally, the baked good is frozen for not longer than about 9 months.


Moisture loss can be measured using any suitable technique. Preferably, moisture loss is measured by comparing the weight of the baked good before freezing to the weight of the baked good after being frozen for a desired time period. Desirably, the moisture loss is about 5% w/w or less (e.g., about 2% w/w or less, about 1% w/w or less, or even about 0.8% w/w or less). It is believed that the starch of the invention inhibits moisture less by inhibiting sublimation of water upon freezing, or by inhibiting formation of ice crystals which would then separate from the baked goods. Likewise, the degree of shrinkage of a frozen baked good can be measured using any suitable method. Typically and preferably, shrinkage is measured by comparing the height of the baked good before freezing and after freezing. Desirably, the shrinkage is about 5% or less (e.g., about 4% or less, about 3% or less, or even about 2% or less).


The inventive method can be used to reduce moisture loss and/or shrinkage in any suitable baked good subjected to freezing. Examples of suitable baked goods include, but are not limited to, high-ratio layer cakes, muffins, and cookies. Preferably, the inventive method is used to reduce moisture loss and/or shrinkage in high-ratio layer cakes.


Example 1

This example further illustrates the invention but should not be construed as in any way limiting its scope. This example demonstrates a method of reducing moisture loss and shrinkage in a frozen baked good.


Yellow cake formulations were prepared containing 0.5-1.0% w/w of each of the following food starches: unmodified dent corn starch (comparative), hydroxypropyl acid thinned corn starch, hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate, pre-gelatinized hydroxypropyl acid thinned corn starch, pre-gelatinized modified waxy maize corn starch, INSCOSITY® B656, and xanthan gum. Characteristics such as moisture, weight, volume, symmetry, batter temperature, batter viscosity, batter specific gravity, pH, crust and crumb analysis, sensory analysis, and textural analysis were assessed using standard methods known in the art. In particular, textural analysis was conducted on a TA.XT2 Texture Analyzer using the AIB standard procedure for cake firmness. Textural analysis was conducted on cakes stored at ambient temperature (72° F.) at days 1, 3, and 8, and on cakes removed from the freezer and thawed after 6 weeks, 3 months, and 9 months of frozen storage. Moisture loss and shrinkage in each cake formulation was assessed following nine months of freezing. The results of the moisture loss and shrinkage tests are set forth in Table 1 and 2. (Examples other than INSCOSITY® represent controls.)












TABLE 1








Moisture Loss



Starch Tested
(%)









no starch
3.2



unmodified dent corn starch
2.7



hydroxypropyl acid thinned corn
1.1



starch



hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate
1.1



pre-gelatinized hydroxypropyl acid
1.9



thinned corn starch



pre-gelatinized modified waxy maize
1.4



corn starch



INSCOSITY ® B656
0.6



Xanthan gum
1.5




















TABLE 2








Shrinkage (in height)



Starch Tested
(%)



















no starch
13.4



unmodified dent corn starch
5.4



hydroxypropyl acid thinned corn
31.3



starch



hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate
12.4



pre-gelatinized hydroxypropyl acid
2.5



thinned corn starch



pre-gelatinized modified waxy maize
9.3



corn starch



INSCOSITY ® B656
1.6



Xanthan Gum
10.8










As a result of these experiments, the optimal amount of INSCOSITY® B656 modified food starch required to improve the shelf-life of the frozen cake formulations was determined to be between 0.75% w/w and 1.0% w/w.


The results of this example demonstrate that the inventive method reduces moisture loss and shrinkage in frozen high-ratio cake products. Indeed, the results demonstrate that inclusion of a pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch, such as INSCOSITY® B656, was the most effective of the starches tested in reducing moisture loss and shrinkage.


Example 2

Comparison of instant starch viscosity of various commercial starches, including the preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2, is provided in Table 3 below. For each starch example, mixtures were made as follows: 5% starch, 15% granulated sugar, and 80% Culligan water were mixed at room temperature for about 10 minutes and viscosity in centipoises was then measured using a Brookfield viscometer, #4 spindle, 20 rpm at room temperature. The preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2 (i.e., INSCOSITY® B656) is identified as Commercial Products N and O in separate measurements in Table 3. For Commercial Products N and O, the pH of the pre-gelatinized suspension is less than about 7.0. An alternative commercial starch to the preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2 is identified as Commercial Products P and Q in separate measurements in Table 3. For Commercial Products P and Q, the pH of the pre-gelatinized suspension is greater than about 7.0.


Comparison of moisture retention and percent shrinkage of various commercial starches, including the preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2, is provided in Table 4 below. Cakes were made in accordance with the American Institute of Baking Standard Yellow Cake Formulation, and a starch was added to the batter as shown in Table 4. The preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2, i.e., INSCOSITY® B656, is identified as Commercial Product AI in Table 4. Commercial Products AK is xanthan gum. Commercial Product AJ and AM are each a drum dried pre-gelled waxy maize, hydroxy propylated and crosslinked starch. Commercial Product AL is a spray cooked waxy, hydroxy propylated starch. As shown in Table 4, cake having Commercial Product AI is superior in moisture retention and has less shrinkage over time in freezer storage, and has better texture analyzer scores (i.e., less hardness) over time in the freezer (i.e., 9 months) or cakes having the other commercial starches. Cake having Commercial Product AI is also superior to cakes having other commercial starches in terms of cell structure in that it does not contain large holes (or tunneling) after 9 months in the freezer, compared to cakes having other commercial starches, which did have tunneling after 9 months in the freezer.


Comparison of moisture retention and percent shrinkage of various commercial starches, including the preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2, is provided in Table 5 below. The preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2, i.e., INSCOSITY® B656, is identified as Commercial Product AI in Table 5. The commercial starch identified as Commercial Product A in Table 3, which is drum dried waxy maize acetylated crosslinked starch, is identified as Commercial Product AN in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, cake having Commercial Product AI is superior in moisture retention and has less shrinkage over time in freezer storage, and has better texture analyzer scores (i.e., less hardness) over time in the freezer (i.e., 13 months) than cake having Commercial Product AN. Cake having Commercial Product AI did not have tunneling after 13 months in the freezer, unlike cake having Commercial Product AN, which did having tunneling after 13 months in the freezer.


Comparison of moisture retention and percent shrinkage of various commercial starches, including the preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2, is provided in Table 6 below. The preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2, i.e. INSCOSITY® B656, is identified as Commercial Product AI in Table 6. The commercial starch identified as Commercial Product K in Table 3, which is a spray cooked waxy hydroxyl propylated and crosslinked starch, is identified as Commercial Product AO in Table 6. As shown in Table 6, cake having Commercial Product AI is superior in moisture retention and has less shrinkage over time in freezer storage, and has better texture analyzer scores (i.e., less hardness) over time in the freezer (i.e., 18 months) than cake having Commercial Product AO. Cake having Commercial Product AI did not have tunneling after 18 months in the freezer, unlike cake having Commercial Product AO, which did having tunneling after 18 months in the freezer.


Comparison of moisture retention and percent shrinkage of various commercial starches, including the preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2, is provided in Table 7 below. The preferred commercial starch of Tables 1 and 2, i.e., INSCOSITY® B656, is identified as Commercial Product AI in Table 7. The commercial starch identified as Commercial Product B in Table 3, which is a drum dried pre-gelatinized tapioca hydroxy propylated crosslinked starch, is identified as Commercial Product AP in Table 7. The commercial starch identified as Commercial Product AQ in Table 7 is an alcohol processed dent corn hydroxy propylated cross linked starch. The commercial starch identified as Commercial Product M in Table 3 is an alcohol processed waxy hydroxy propylated cross linked starch and is identified as Commercial Product AR in Table 7. As shown in Table 7, cake having Commercial Product AI is superior in moisture retention and has less shrinkage, and has better texture analyzer scores (i.e., less hardness) over time at room temperature (i.e., 8 days) than cake having Commercial Product AP, AQ, and AR. These numbers suggest that in the freezer, cake having Commercial Product AI will hold up better in terms of moisture retention, less percent shrinkage, and less hardness than cake having the other commercial starches. Cake having Commercial Product AI did not have tunneling after 8 days at room temperature, unlike cake having Commercial Products AP, AQ, and AR, which did having tunneling after 8 days at room temperature.









TABLE 3







Comparison of Instant Starch Viscosity










Dry Solids Basis
As is Basis



















Starch
Manufacturing
Base

10
20
30
60

10
20
30
60


Name
Process
Starch
Initial
min
min
min
min
Initial
min
min
min
min






















Commercial Product A
Drum Dried
Waxy
1060
1230
1440
1760
2260
380
450
590
660
840


Commercial Product B
Drum Dried
Tapioca
5810
5940
6170
6500
6470
3590
3910
4130
4320
4960


Commercial Product C
Drum Dried
Waxy
12240
12040
12040
12960
12720
8950
8790
9690
10580
10660


Commercial Product D
Drum Dried
Waxy
1790
2000
2740
2930
3900
990
1110
1350
1700
2180


Commercial Product E
Drum Dried
Waxy
11420
12300
13720
13760
15180
6980
7650
8620
8910
9280


Commercial Product F
Drum Dried
Waxy
2760
2930
3140
3180
3790
1680
1890
2100
2260
2350


Commercial Product G
Spray Cooked
Waxy
1880
2010
2210
2520
3250
640
710
890
940
1500


Commercial Product H
Spray Cooked
Tapioca
1350
1870
2830
3590
4750
290
510
630
830
1490



did not disperse



well


Commercial Product I
Spray Cooked
Waxy
3670
3720
4380
4550
5010
1620
1930
2140
2330
2710


Commercial Product J
Spray Cooked
Waxy
11900
13780
15280
15400
14800
9590
10780
11620
11900
11220


Commercial Product K
Spray Cooked
Waxy
2560
2720
3210
3130
3970
930
1010
1290
1310
1740


Commercial Product L
Spray Cooked
Waxy
2950
2990
3700
3840
4010
1030
1100
1380
1580
2080


Commercial Product M
Alcohol Process
Waxy
7990
7850
7600
7520
7130
7020
6600
6380
6360
6290


Commercial Product N
Spray Cooked
Dent
3370
3510
3780
3900
4240
1410
1640
1880
2150
2300


Commercial Product O
Spray Cooked
Dent
3370
3510
4100
4340
4350
4000
4110
4200
4290
4390


Commercial Product P
Spray Cooked
Dent
6280
6390
6410
6380
6530
3590
3750
3960
4530
4390


Commercial Product Q
Spray Cooked
Dent
5570
6230
6260
6280
6300
3770
3990
4190
4090
4340


Commercial Product R
Alcohol Process
Dent
6030
6100
5780
5790
5650
3470
3230
3540
3450
3220


Commercial Product S
Alcohol Process
Dent
10500
10240
9300
9280
8770
6600
6400
6200
6200
5910
















TABLE 4







Comparison of Starches















Batter








Viscosity
Volume
Moisture
Shrinkage
Textural Analysis


Cake Variable
Date
Centipoise
cc
%
% Height
Hardness, grams
















Control
Day 1, Room Temp.
20,420
1551
27.8

396.15



Day 8, Room Temp.


22.7

617.42



Frozen, 9 months


24.6
13.4
493.59


Commercial Product AA
Day 1, Room Temp.
20,980
1579
27.3

391.88


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


23.8

606.76



Frozen, 9 months


24.6
5.4
478.84


Commercial Product AB
Day 1, Room Temp.
20,373
1518
28.2

435.12


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


26.7

620.87



Frozen, 9 months


27.1
12.4
462.92


Commercial Product AC
Day 1, Room Temp.
19,351
1515
27.2

389.61


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


25.2

630.86



Frozen, 9 months


25.3
16.7
438.54


Commercial Product AD
Day 1, Room Temp.
22,500
1476
26.6

378.84


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


25.8

602.96



Frozen, 9 months


25.5
31.3
510.53


Commercial Product AE
Day 1, Room Temp.
18,472
1544
26

415.94


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


25

603.42



Frozen, 9 months


23.9
6.5
495.5


Commercial Product AF
Day 1, Room Temp.
16,342
1538
25.7

353.85


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


24.7

544.46



Frozen, 9 months


23.7
11.3
491.42


Commercial Product AG
Day 1, Room Temp.
23,323
1509
29.6

389.54


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


24.3

587.16



Frozen, 9 months


27.7
2.5
360.73


Commercial Product AH
Day 1, Room Temp.
28,014
1570
27

341.39


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


25.9

521.97



Frozen, 9 months


25
10.4
415.93


Commercial Product AI
Day 1, Room Temp.
33,500
1520
28.9

384.07


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


25.9

567.24



Frozen, 9 months


28.3
1.6
354.58


Commercial Product AI
Day 1, Room Temp.
27,340
1528
29.7

417.5


0.5%
Day 8, Room Temp.


25.8

547.11



Frozen, 9 months


23
5.4
477.95


Commercial Product AI
Day 1, Room Temp.
23,171
1570
27.9

344.72


0.45%
Day 8, Room Temp.


27.1

505.1


Commercial Product AG
Frozen, 9 months


25
6
417.37


0.25%


Commercial Product AJ
Day 1, Room Temp.
48,900
1526
27

391.75


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


24.5

571.52



Frozen, 9 months


25.6
9.3
387.09


Commercial Product AK
Day 1, Room Temp.
29,320
1499
25.5

409.14


0.10%
Day 8, Room Temp.


19.6

645.76



Frozen, 9 months


24
10.8
503.01


Commercial Product AL
Day 1, Room Temp.
41,000
1510
29

392.73


1%
Frozen, 6 months


27.3
16.6
421.14


Commercial Product AM
Day 1, Room Temp.
38,380
1520
28.6

360.81


1%
Day 8, Room Temp.


25.3

546.21



Frozen, 9 months


26.8
5.8
414.95
















TABLE 5







Comparison of Starches















Batter








Viscosity
Volume
Moisture
Shrinkage
Textural Analysis


Cake Variable
Date
Centipoise
cc
%
% Height
Hardness, grams
















Control
Day 1, Room Temp.
19,790
1663
27.7

410.37



May 5, 2003



Day 8, Room Temp.


28.2

N/A



May 13, 2003



Frozen, 13 months


25
10
443.95



(Jun. 4, 2004)


Commercial Product AI
Day 1, Room Temp.
25,754
1598
27.4

392.84


1%
May 5, 2003



Day 8, Room Temp.


25

N/A



May 13, 2003



Frozen, 13 months


25.7
1.3
342.95



(Jun. 4, 2004)


Commercial Product AN
Day 1, Room Temp.
33,651
1584
27

394.86


1%
May 5, 2003



Day 8, Room Temp.


24.7

N/A



May 13, 2003



Frozen, 13 months


23.1
6.1
411.62



(Jun. 4, 2004)
















TABLE 6







Comparison of Starches















Batter








Viscosity
Volume
Moisture
Shrinkage
Textural Analysis


Cake Variable
Date
Centipoise
cc
%
% Height
Hardness, grams
















Control
Day 1, Room Temp.
20,560
1550
26.1

349.37



Dec. 30, 2002



Day 8, Room Temp.


22.9

556.06



Jan. 7, 2003



Frozen, 18 months


24
12.8
501.26



(Jun. 5, 2004)


Commercial Product AI
Day 1, Room Temp.
34,560
1535
27.9

320.97


1%
Dec. 30, 2002



Day 8, Room Temp.


24.8

538.39



Jan. 7, 2003



Frozen, 18 months


26.2
3
430.19



(Jun. 5, 2004)


Commercial Product AO
Day 1, Room Temp.
44,933
1510
28.5

355.37


1%
Dec. 30, 2002



Day 8, Room Temp.


23

576.49



Jan. 7, 2003



Frozen, 18 months


22.7
3.7
496.35



(Jun. 5, 2004)


Commercial Product AO
Day 1; Room Temp.
31,280
1590
26.1
3.4
322.5


0.75%
Dec. 30, 2002



Day 8, Room Temp.


23.8

543.58



Jan. 7, 2003



Frozen, 18 months


22.7

478.87



(Jun. 5, 2004)
















TABLE 7







Comparison of Starches















Batter








Viscosity
Volume
Moisture
Shrinkage
Textural Analysis


Cake Variable
Date
Centipoise
cc
%
% Height
Hardness, grams
















Control
Day 1, Room Temp.
21,120
1575
28.9

N/A



May 27, 2004



Day 8, Room Temp.


27.1

566.62



Jun. 4, 2004


Commercial Product AI
Day 1, Room Temp.
31,560
1525
31.4

N/A


1%
May 27, 2004



Day 8, Room Temp.


28.8

510.8



Jun. 4, 2004


Commercial Product AP
Day 1, Room Temp.
37,200
1525
29.6

N/A


1%
May 27, 2004



Day 8, Room Temp.


27

541.7



Jun. 4, 2004


Commercial Product AQ
Day 1, Room Temp.
28,200
1525
30.7

N/A


1%
May 27, 2004



Day 8, Room Temp.


26.4

558.69



Jun. 4, 2004


Commercial Product AR
Day 1, Room Temp.
31,880
1500
30.5

N/A


1%
May 27, 2004



Day 8, Room Temp.


26.8

553.15



Jun. 4, 2004









Example 3

In accordance with the invention, a pre-gelatinized starch is incorporated into a baked cake. A glaze may also be applied to the surface of the baked cake. The cake may also be flash-frozen.


All references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples or exemplary language provided herein is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.


Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.

Claims
  • 1. A method of reducing moisture loss in a frozen baked good comprising: (a) preparing a baked good comprising a pre-gelatinized modified starch, said starch comprising a hydroxypropyl starch phosphate being substantially completely in granular form and,(b) freezing the baked good, said starch being present in said baked good in an amount effective to provide less than 5% moisture loss upon freezing.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the pre-gelatinized modified granular starch is hydroxypropyl dent corn distarch phosphate.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the baked good is frozen for a period of about two months to about nine months and has less than 2% moisture loss.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the baked good comprises about 0.5% w/w to about 10% w/w of the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the baked good comprises about 0.75% w/w to about 1% w/w of the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the starch is present in said baked good in an amount effective to provide less than 2% shrinkage of the baked good after nine months.
  • 7. A method of reducing shrinkage of a frozen baked good, which method comprises: (a) preparing a baked good batter comprising a pre-gelatinized modified starch, said starch comprising a hydroxypropyl starch phosphate being substantially completely in granular form, the batter having a viscosity less than about 35,000 centipoise at room temperature,(b) preparing the baked good batter to form a baked good, and(c) freezing the baked good, said starch being present in said baked good in an amount effective to provide less than 5% moisture loss upon freezing.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the pre-gelatinized modified granular starch is hydroxypropyl dent corn distarch phosphate.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the baked good is frozen for a period of about two months to about nine months and has less than 2% moisture loss.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein the baked good comprises about 0.5% w/w to about 10% w/w of the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the baked good comprises about 0.75% w/w to about 1% w/w of the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch.
  • 12. The method of claim 7, wherein the baked good is a high ratio cake.
  • 13. The method of claim 7, wherein the batter has a viscosity less than about 33,000 centipoise at room temperature.
  • 14. The method of claim 7, wherein the starch is present in said baked good in an amount effective to provide less than 2% shrinkage of the baked good after nine months.
  • 15. A method of reducing moisture loss in a frozen baked good comprising: (a) preparing a baked good comprising a pre-gelatinized modified starch, said starch comprising a hydroxypropyl starch phosphate being substantially completely in granular form and,(b) freezing the baked good, said starch being present in said baked good in an amount effective to reduce moisture loss upon freezing relative to the absence of said starch, wherein the batter has a viscosity less than about 33,000 centipoise at room temperature.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the pre-gelatinized modified granular starch is hydroxypropyl dent corn distarch phosphate.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the baked good comprises about 0.5% w/w to about 10% w/w of the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the baked good comprises about 0.75% w/w to about 1% w/w of the pre-gelatinized modified granular dent corn starch.
RELATED APPLICATION

This is a nonprovisional application of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/486,685, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60486685 Jul 2003 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10889481 Jul 2004 US
Child 13238835 US