The present invention relates devices and methods for administering immunotherapy to a patient, particularly for the treatment of patients with solid tumors.
For many years the basic treatment for cancer has consisted of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. More recently, drugs that target cancer cells, such as imatinib (Gleevac®) and trastuzumab (Herceptin®) by guiding themselves to specific molecular changes seen in the cancer cells have also become standard treatments for a number of cancers.
Now, therapies that take advantage of a patient's immune system to fight their cancers are in clinical use or in development and gaining interest. There are four basic versions of immunotherapy products today, which can be used alone or in combination. These immunotherapy products include immunomodulators, vaccines, modified cells and check-point inhibitors.
Immunomodulators include IL-2, IL-7, IL-12, Interferons, G-CSF, Imiquimod, CCL3, CCL26, CXCL7, cytosine phosphate-guanosine, oligodeoxynucleotides, and glucans, and all operate to systemically increase the patient's immune response. Vaccines comprise an infusion of antigen directly or antigen-activated dendritic cells, which activate the patients white blood cells. Modified cells are blood-derived immune cells from the patient which are engineered and incubated to grow to a large number of modified cells that specifically target a region of tumor. This approach, referred to as adoptive cell transfer (ACT) has generated remarkable responses in the small clinical trials in which it has been investigated. Check-point inhibitors include anti-PD-1, which block the patient's natural suppression of T-cells, thereby effectively increasing the time and number of T-cells that can fight the cancer.
Immunotherapy practice has had success in “liquid” tumors, such as leukemia, where the therapy is easily delivered to the site of the cancer via intravenous injection or infusion. Further, immunotherapy has promise for solid tumors. However, delivery of the therapy with sufficient penetration into the tumors to allow the therapy to interact with the cancer cells remains a challenge.
In current practice, the immunotherapy agents are delivered by oral dosage, venous delivery, or catheter-based delivery to an organ of interest with a traditional microcatheter.
In venous delivery, the agent is generally infused into the patient through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or a port implanted in the patient. PICCs and ports can remain in place for several weeks or months and are used to reduce the number of times that a patient is subject to needle sticks and to reduce risk of tissue and muscle damage that can occur with a standard IV. While a PICC or port may be suitable for infusion of a chemotherapy treatment agent, which is generally circulated throughout the patient's circulation system, or for a “liquid” tumor, it may not be suitable for delivery of the immunotherapy agent to a solid tumor.
Microcatheters can be delivered to localize delivery of the agent to the vascular system adjacent the organ of interest. However, various issues prevent desirable agent uptake at the tumor.
In accord with the invention, systems and methods are provided for delivery of immunotherapy agents to a solid tumor.
Solid tumors undergo angiogenesis, which creates unique vascular characteristics compared to healthy tissue. Solid tumors often have regions of high vascular density, a reduced resistance to flow, and a high capacitance for therapy. As a result of the unregulated tumor angiogenic process, a dense branching network of vessels is formed in the tumor. The formed dense network has a different vessel structure than health vessels. A healthy vessel is encased in endothelium, which maintains vascular tone and provides resistance to flow. Tumor vessels have a deteriorated endothelium and lack tone; this results in lower resistance to flow. Also, the dense network of vessels creates a relatively large vascular volume for the relative volume of the tissue, permitting a significantly higher volume of therapy to be deposited in the tumor compared to healthy tissue. Further, solid tumors can exhibit regions of low pressure within their vessels where there is robust flow, and they can have regions of high pressure where the vessels have become leaky and there is poor to no endogenous arterial flow. For these reasons, it is important to have an infusion system that does not rely solely on endogenous arterial flow to control delivery.
In view of these identified factors, it is believed by the inventors that immunotherapy systems and procedures should achieve several goals. Highly targeted delivery to the organ of interest should be obtained without the chance of back-flow into non-target regions. There should be the ability to increase pressure during infusion to overcome regions of high pressure in the tumor. More therapy should be deposited in the tumor than in the healthy tissue. The immunotherapy dose should deliver a maximum amount of intact cells or antibodies (a maximum percentage of healthy immunotherapy dose), and a minimum amount of damaged, destroyed cells, or activated cells during infusion. In addition, it is desirable to have a catheter deliver a homogenous immunotherapy dose across a vessel, including across a vessel branching network.
In accord with these goals, an immunotherapy treatment is delivered through a fully or partially deployed intravascular pressure modulating anti-reflux catheter, such as a catheter with microvalve and filter or a balloon catheter.
Further, the anti-reflux catheter may have one or more additional attributes that are advantageous in the delivery of cancer treatments. By way of example, these attributes can include the following. The catheter has self-centering capability that provides homogeneous distribution of therapy in a downstream branching network of vessels. The catheter includes an anti-reflux capability that blocks the retrograde flow of therapy into proximal non-target vessels proximal to the catheter tip. The system allows forward flow at a reduced pressure when not infusing therapy to target regions of low vascular resistance (tumor) and high capacitance (tumor). The valve and filter or a fully deployed balloon allows the pressure to be increased during infusion, with the pressure being modulated by the physician. An increased pressure allows increased delivery to and penetration into regions of the tumor that are naturally subject to high pressure conditions. According to another aspect of the device, a coating can be provided to the hub and inner lumen of the catheter to inhibit T-cell activation. According to yet another aspect of the device, a coating or construct can be provided to the hub and inner lumen of the catheter that optimize the wall shear during delivery of the therapy. By optimizing the wall shear gradient, the T-cells are subject to reduced trauma and maintain integrity during delivery while preventing clumping of the cells.
In accord with the method described herein, the treatment catheter is used in a method of delivering an immunotherapy agent. The treatment includes infusion of immunotherapy cells, anti-bodies, and/or other biologics into the target organ, including a selected location within the target organ, while maintaining a high integrity of the cells of the immunotherapy dose.
A modified Seldinger technique is used to introduce the catheter into the patient. More particularly, the catheter is introduced into the femoral artery, and then advanced up the aorta to the celiac axis. The catheter is then advanced into the left gastric artery. From the left gastric artery, the distal end of the catheter is advanced to the target artery that feeds the target organ. The catheter is then deployed for organ targeting.
Then, the immunotherapy agent, including immunotherapy T-cells, is infused under pressure through the catheter and to the tumor. Infusion is continued until the prescribed dose of immunotherapy is completely infused. This can occur at sub-stasis, at stasis, or beyond stasis. At stasis, the immunotherapy can be infused without any reflux. Further, by either manually inflating the balloon of a balloon catheter to block flow past the balloon in the vessel, or by use of the dynamically adjustable anti-reflux infusion catheter with valve, the immunotherapy can be infused beyond stasis without concern that the immunotherapy will reflux back toward the vessels of non-target tissues and/or organs.
After the infusion of the immunotherapy agent, the anti-reflux catheter is removed from the patient, and an arterial closure device is used to close the arterial access point for the procedure.
With reference to the human body and components of the devices and systems described herein which are intended to be hand-operated by a user, the terms “proximal” and “distal” are defined in reference to the user's hand, with the term “proximal” being closer to the user's hand, and the term “distal” being further from the user's hand, unless alternate definitions are specifically provided.
Methods are provided herein for infusing an immunotherapy agent to a tumor site for treatment of cancer. The method includes use of an infusion catheter device. In accord with the method, the infusion catheter device is an infusion microcatheter with valve and filter, or filter valve, (hereinafter “microvalve catheter”) or an infusion microcatheter with a distal balloon (hereinafter “balloon catheter”), with both such devices collectively referred to herein as “anti-reflux infusion catheters”. Whereas the balloon catheter is manually operable between expanded (open) and collapsed (closed) configurations, the microvalve catheter is a dynamic device, automatically moving between open and closed configurations based on local fluid pressure conditions to which the proximal and distal surfaces of the valve and filter are subject.
By way of example, referring to
Turning now to
In accord with one preferred aspect of the anti-reflux infusion catheter used in the method, the anti-reflux infusion catheter is adapted to self-center within a vessel 224. This can be accomplished with the expandable balloon 314 being centered about the balloon catheter, or the expandable valve 212 (
In accord with another preferred aspect of the anti-reflux infusion catheter, such catheter blocks retrograde flow of immunotherapy into proximal non-target vessels proximal to the catheter tip, or a balloon or a valve on the catheter. In accord with yet another aspect of the anti-reflux infusion catheter, the valve and filter or a partially deployed balloon permit forward flow at a reduced pressure when not infusing the immunotherapy to target regions of low vascular resistance (tumor) and high capacitance (tumor).
In accord with yet another aspect of the anti-reflux infusion catheter, the valve and filter or a fully deployed balloon allows the infusion pressure to be increased during infusion, with the pressure being modulatable by the physician. By increasing the pressure, an increase in delivery and penetration of the immunotherapy into regions of the tumor that are naturally subject to high pressure conditions is effected. Referring to
In accord with another aspect of the anti-reflux catheter (with reference to device 202, but equally applicable to device 302), an inner lining of the lumen 208 of the catheter 204 is tailored to minimize surface energy and interaction with T-cells. The inner lining of the lumen 208 is coated with one or more polymers 230 (
In accord with another aspect of the anti-reflux catheter, as an addition to or alternative to the coating described above, an inner lining surface 232a of the lumen 208a of the catheter 204a is structurally patterned to create an oleophobic and/or a hydrophobic surface geometry (
In accord with another aspect of the anti-reflux catheter, as an addition to or alternative to the coatings and structure described above, the inner lining surface of the lumen can be modified with hydrogels that can act to inhibit T-cell attachment and/or activation or can be used as protectants against fluid-mechanical cell damage. Such polymers are typically hydrophilic and electrically neutral and hydrogen bond acceptors rather than hydrogen bond donors. Examples include but are not limited to polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and chemically modified PEO-(X) hybrid gels, poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG) and chemically modified PEG-(X) hybrid gels (PEGylated polymers), polyethylene oxide (PEO) and chemically modified PEO-(X) hybrid gels, Poly(acrylic acid), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)-based polymers and zwitterionic hydrogels such as phosphobetaine, sulfobetaine, and carboxybetaine which can display variable surface activity based on environmental pH. Furthermore, natural or artificial protein layers can be provided to the lumen surface or the hydrogel network and can have specific cellular stabilizing activities. Such a protein layer can include cytokines. Such polymers and proteins can be attached in cross-linked networks or in “brushy” layers of polymer strands. Methodology includes self-assembled monolayers of short chain hydrogels or peptides attached to the inner surface of the lumen of the catheter using a variety of covalent or ionic bonding chemistry and layer-by-layer self-assembly of tailored functionality nano-composite gels.
In accord with another aspect of the anti-reflux infusion catheter, an alternative or additional coating or structure can be provided to the hub and/or inner lining of the lumen of the catheter that will reduce the wall shear stress during delivery of the immunotherapy. Such a coating or structure can include a hydrophilic coating, a hydrophobic coating, or a small ‘brushy’ fibrous layer that acts to create a region of low flow or no flow along the wall of the catheter. By way of example, the coating can include glycocalyx or a glycocalyx-mimicking layer. Glycocalyx is a glycoprotein-polysaccharide, including several carbohydrate moieties of membrane glycolipids and glycoproteins. In the vascular endothelial tissue, the glycocalyx is a small, irregularly shaped layer extending approximately 50-100 nm into the lumen of a blood vessel, but can be up to 11 μm thick. The coating in the lumen can mimic such biological structure.
In accord with another aspect of the anti-reflux infusion catheter, wall shear stress along the lumen can be modified by incorporating a surfactant coating 230b into the lining of the lumen of the catheter. By way of another example, the wall shear stress can be modified by extruding the lumen 208b of the catheter 204b with features, including elongate channels 234b formed along length and open to the central lumen 208b (
By way of another example, the catheter is negatively charged. In one manner, this can be effected by providing wires or even a braid about the lumen and applying a negative voltage to the wires (with no/negligible current during use); in another manner, the catheter is constructed with a negatively charged polymer. The immunotherapy agent is naturally negatively charge (as T-cells have negative surface charge). Then, the T-cells in the immunotherapy agent are repelled from the lumen surface to thereby reduce the shear stress upon infusion of the immunotherapy agent.
In accord with another manner of reducing wall shear stress, the wall shear stress can be minimized by incorporating a surfactant into the immunotherapy fluid containing the T cells. The surfactant can be premixed with the immunotherapy agent or mixed at the time of infusion.
In accord with a preferred procedure for delivering immunotherapy, a modified Seldinger technique is utilized. In the Seldinger technique, which is well-known and will not be described in detail herein, access is provided from the thigh to the femoral artery and a guidewire is advanced to the aorta. The delivery catheter is advanced over the guidewire. Once the delivery catheter is at its intended position, and in accord with the method herein, an anti-reflux infusion catheter is advanced through the delivery catheter and over the guidewire.
Then the anti-reflux catheter is displaced relative to the delivery catheter to expose the distal end of the anti-reflux catheter. The anti-reflux catheter is deployed.
Then, the immunotherapy agent, including immunotherapy T-cells, is infused through the catheter and under pressure to the tumor. Infusion is continued until the prescribed dose of immunotherapy is completely infused. This can occur at sub-stasis, at stasis, or beyond stasis. At stasis, the immunotherapy can be infused without any reflux. Further, by either manually inflating the balloon of a balloon catheter to block flow past the balloon in the vessel, or by use of the dynamically adjustable anti-reflux infusion catheter with valve, the immunotherapy can be infused beyond stasis without concern that the immunotherapy will reflux back toward the vessels of non-target tissues and/or organs.
After the infusion of the immunotherapy agent, the anti-reflux catheter is removed from the patient, and an arterial closure device is used to close the arterial access point for the procedure.
There have been described and illustrated herein embodiments of apparatus and methods for delivering immunotherapy agents to target tissue. While particular embodiments of the invention have been described, it is not intended that the invention be limited thereto, as it is intended that the invention be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Particularly, it is intended that various aspects presented with respect to coated and structurally modifying the lining of the lumen described herein can be used either alone, or in combination with one or multiple other aspects. To such extent, it is anticipated that the lumen can include both structural modification and/or multiple coatings to facilitate passage of the immunotherapy with the least negative effect on the T-cells in the therapy. It will therefore be appreciated by those skilled in the art that yet other modifications could be made to the provided invention without deviating from its spirit and scope as claimed.
This application is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 15/064,158, filed Mar. 8, 2016, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/140,651, filed Mar. 31, 2015, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
926591 | Odquist | Jun 1909 | A |
4261341 | Hakim | Apr 1981 | A |
4311587 | Nose | Jan 1982 | A |
4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
4714460 | Calderon | Dec 1987 | A |
4738740 | Pinchuk | Apr 1988 | A |
4800016 | Yang | Jan 1989 | A |
4840542 | Abbott | Jun 1989 | A |
4883459 | Calderon | Nov 1989 | A |
4892518 | Cupp | Jan 1990 | A |
5030199 | Barwick | Jul 1991 | A |
5071407 | Termin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5084015 | Moriuchi | Jan 1992 | A |
5234425 | Fogarty | Aug 1993 | A |
5397307 | Goodin | Mar 1995 | A |
5411478 | Stillabower | May 1995 | A |
5419763 | Hildebrand | May 1995 | A |
5484399 | DiResta | Jan 1996 | A |
5484412 | Pierpont | Jan 1996 | A |
5496277 | Termin et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5607466 | Imbert et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5668237 | Popall | Sep 1997 | A |
5688237 | Rozga | Nov 1997 | A |
5725571 | Imbert et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5755769 | Richard et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759205 | Valentini | Jun 1998 | A |
5810789 | Powers | Sep 1998 | A |
5836905 | Lemelson | Nov 1998 | A |
5836967 | Schneider | Nov 1998 | A |
5893869 | Barnhart | Apr 1999 | A |
5895399 | Barbut | Apr 1999 | A |
5897567 | Ressemann | Apr 1999 | A |
5910154 | Tsugita | Jun 1999 | A |
5911734 | Tsugita | Jun 1999 | A |
5957974 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6001118 | Daniel | Dec 1999 | A |
6010522 | Barbut | Jan 2000 | A |
6027520 | Tsugita | Feb 2000 | A |
6042598 | Tsugita | Mar 2000 | A |
6051014 | Jang | Apr 2000 | A |
6059745 | Gelbfish | May 2000 | A |
6152946 | Broome | Nov 2000 | A |
6165199 | Barbut | Dec 2000 | A |
6165200 | Tsugita | Dec 2000 | A |
6168579 | Tsugita | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179851 | Barbut | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6231551 | Barbut | May 2001 | B1 |
6235044 | Root | May 2001 | B1 |
6258120 | McKenzie | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6306074 | Waksman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306163 | Fitz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309399 | Barbut | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6361545 | Macoviak | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371969 | Tsugita | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371971 | Tsugita | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383206 | Gillick | May 2002 | B1 |
6395014 | Macoviak | May 2002 | B1 |
6416495 | Kriesel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436112 | Wensel | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6443926 | Kletschka | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478783 | Moorehead | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485456 | Kletschka | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485502 | Don Michael | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6499487 | McKenzie | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500203 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6520183 | Amar | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530935 | Wensel | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533800 | Barbut | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537294 | Boyle | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537297 | Tsugita | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540722 | Boyle | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551303 | Van Tassel | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565552 | Barbut | May 2003 | B1 |
6569146 | Werner | May 2003 | B1 |
6582396 | Parodi | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589264 | Barbut | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592546 | Barbut | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6607506 | Kletschka | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620148 | Tsugita | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635070 | Leeflang | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641553 | Chee | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6641572 | Cherkassky | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645220 | Huter | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645222 | Parodi | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645223 | Boyle | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652555 | VanTassel | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652556 | VanTassel | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656351 | Boyle | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673090 | Root et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6676682 | Tsugita | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689150 | VanTassel | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692508 | Wensel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692509 | Wensel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692513 | Streeter | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695813 | Boyle | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695858 | Dubrul | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699231 | Sterman | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6702834 | Boylan | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6706053 | Boylan | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6706055 | Douk | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730108 | VanTassel | May 2004 | B2 |
6746469 | Mouw | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746489 | Dua et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6802317 | Goebel | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818006 | Douk | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830579 | Barbut | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837898 | Boyle | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855154 | Abdel-Gawwad | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866677 | Douk | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6887258 | Denison | May 2005 | B2 |
6896690 | Lambrecht | May 2005 | B1 |
6902540 | Dorros | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908474 | Hogendijk | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911036 | Douk | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6936060 | Hogendijk | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939362 | Boyle | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964670 | Shah | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6964673 | Tsugita | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974469 | Broome | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6989027 | Allen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997898 | Forman | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7044958 | Douk | May 2006 | B2 |
7044966 | Svanidze | May 2006 | B2 |
7066946 | Douk | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7101396 | Artof | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118600 | Dua et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7162303 | Levin | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169164 | Borillo | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172614 | Boyle | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7172621 | Theron | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7214237 | Don Michael | May 2007 | B2 |
7217255 | Boyle | May 2007 | B2 |
7223253 | Hogendijk | May 2007 | B2 |
7232452 | Adams | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232453 | Shimon | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241304 | Boyle | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250041 | Chiu | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252675 | Denison | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7279000 | Cartier | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7306575 | Barbut | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7322957 | Kletschka | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326226 | Root et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331973 | Gesswein | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338510 | Boylan | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344549 | Boyle | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7364566 | Elkins | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371249 | Douk | May 2008 | B2 |
7425215 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7503904 | Choi | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7537600 | Eskuri | May 2009 | B2 |
7544202 | Cartier | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7572272 | Denison | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7582100 | Johnson | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7585309 | Larson | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591832 | Eversull | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7604650 | Bergheim | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7647115 | Levin | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653438 | Deem | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658747 | Forde | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7686781 | Vinten-Johansen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7833242 | Gilson | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842084 | Bicer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846139 | Zinn | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853333 | Demarais | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7873417 | Demarais | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7922691 | Kletchka | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7935075 | Tockman | May 2011 | B2 |
7937143 | Demarais | May 2011 | B2 |
7938799 | Epstein | May 2011 | B2 |
7993324 | Barbut | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8162879 | Hattangadi | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8172792 | Wang | May 2012 | B2 |
8182446 | Schaeffer | May 2012 | B2 |
8200312 | Degani | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8251948 | Goldman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8257384 | Bates | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8262611 | Teesllink | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8397578 | Miesel | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409166 | Wiener | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8500775 | Chomas et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8696698 | Chomas et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696699 | Chomas | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8821476 | Agah | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852207 | Simpson | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9023010 | Chiu | May 2015 | B2 |
9061117 | Roberts | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9078982 | Lane | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9089341 | Chomas | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9126016 | Chomas | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9174020 | Allen | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9205226 | Allen | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9265914 | Fulton, III | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9364358 | Cohen | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9457171 | Agah | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9463304 | Agah | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9474533 | Mathis | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9539081 | Chomas | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9550046 | Allen | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9597480 | Purdy | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9604037 | Fischer, Jr. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9770319 | Pinchuk | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9808332 | Chomas | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9844383 | Allen | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9913959 | Purdy | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9968740 | Pinchuk et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10092742 | Genstler | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10099040 | Agah | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10130762 | Allen | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20010041862 | Glickman | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020042593 | Mickley | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020161390 | Mouw | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161394 | Macoviak | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030097114 | Duriel | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125790 | Fastovsky | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030187474 | Keegan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212361 | Boyle | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233115 | Eversull et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040054315 | Levin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068288 | Palmer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040143185 | Zatezalo | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040215142 | Matheis | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220511 | Scott et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220521 | Barbut | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220609 | Douk | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225354 | Allen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040256584 | Zimmerling | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260333 | Dubral | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004517 | Courtney et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010285 | Lambrecht | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015048 | Chiu | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015112 | Cohn | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050119688 | Burgheim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149112 | Barbut | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050261759 | Lambrecht | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060124140 | Forsell | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060167537 | Larsson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173490 | LaFontaine | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177478 | Humes | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060264898 | Beasley | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070106324 | Gamer | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179590 | Lu | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070239135 | Barbut | Oct 2007 | A9 |
20080031740 | Miyazaki | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080031962 | Boyan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080033341 | Grad | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039786 | Epstein | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080097273 | Levin | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103523 | Chiu | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147007 | Freyman | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090018498 | Chiu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076409 | Wu | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088676 | Murata | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090198321 | Sutermeister et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222035 | Schneiderman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234266 | Solomon | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234283 | Burton | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264819 | Diethrich | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100168785 | Parker | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100331815 | Alt | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110046542 | Evans | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110130657 | Chomas | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137399 | Chomas | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110218494 | Gerrans et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110288529 | Fulton | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295114 | Agah | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295203 | Hayes | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120116351 | Chomas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120259206 | Roberts | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130079731 | Chomas | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130116655 | Bacino | May 2013 | A1 |
20130226166 | Chomas | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140066830 | Lad et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140073536 | Lin | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140207178 | Chomas | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140276135 | Agah | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276411 | Cowan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140364835 | Allen | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378951 | Dye | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150272716 | Pinchuk | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150306311 | Pinchuk et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160015948 | Agah | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160074633 | Schaffner | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160082178 | Agah | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160235942 | Alt | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160235950 | Murata | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160256626 | Chomas | Sep 2016 | A9 |
20160310148 | Allen | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170000493 | Boehm, Jr. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170049946 | Kapur | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170056629 | Agah | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170157370 | Agah | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170173309 | Fischer, Jr. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170209666 | Quigley | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170319820 | Johnson | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170368306 | Tal | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180055620 | Chomas | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180116522 | Brenneman | May 2018 | A1 |
20180125502 | Allen | May 2018 | A1 |
20180250469 | Pinchuk | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180263752 | Pinchuk | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180289464 | Kassab | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180333563 | Agah | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190046157 | Unser | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190083705 | Allen | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20200078555 | Agah | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8910603 | Dec 1989 | DE |
0533511 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0554579 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0416662 | Mar 1996 | EP |
1226795 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1527740 | May 2005 | EP |
1743524 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1803423 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2652267 | Mar 1991 | FR |
2020557 | Jan 1983 | GB |
8905667 | Jun 1989 | WO |
199916382 | Apr 1999 | WO |
199944510 | Sep 1999 | WO |
200141679 | Jun 2001 | WO |
200145592 | Jun 2001 | WO |
200149215 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0197879 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2004043293 | May 2004 | WO |
2011068946 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Application No. PCT/US16/23723 dated Sep. 2, 2016. |
“Allogenic Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified Cells for Adoptive Cell Therapy of Cancer”, Marcus, Assaf et al., Mar. 24, 2014, Expert Opinion of Biological Therapy, vol. 14, Issue 7. |
A Study of the Geometrical and Mechanical Properties of a Self-Expandig Metallic Stent Theory and Experiment, Dr. Michael R. Jedwab, Claude 0. Clerc, Journal of Applied Biomaterials, vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 77-85, Spring 1993. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/266,068, filed Dec. 2, 2009, Chomas et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/382,290, filed Sep. 13, 2010, Chomas et al. |
Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: a Multicentre Safety and Proof-of Principle Cohort Study, Krum et al, The Lancet, 2009. |
Embolization II, Scientific Session 11, JVIR, Mar. 27, 2012. |
Embolization procedure lowers levels of “hunger hormone,” leads to weight loss, EurekAlert Public Release, Mar. 7, 2013. |
Finite Element Stent Design, M. De Beule, R. Van Impe, P. Verdonck, B. Verhegghe, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2005. |
First-In-Man Study of Left Gastric Artery Embolization for Weight Loss, Nicholas Kipshidze et al., ACC.13, E2056, UACC Mar. 12, 2013, vol. 61, Issue 10. |
Fusion Drug Delivery System-Novel Catheter/Stent Design for Targeted Drug Delivery, Gerschwind & Barnett, Non-Published US provisional patent application filed Sep. 17, 2007. |
International Search Report of PCT/US18/22171 dated Aug. 3, 2018. |
Left Gastric Embolization Leads to Weight Loss, Bariatriac News, Owen Haskins, Dec. 4, 2013. |
Renal Denervation as a Therapeutic Approach for Hypertension: Novel Implications for an Old Concept, Schlaich et al., Hypertension, Journal of the American Heart Association, 2009, 54:1195-1201. |
Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension, Schlaich et al, The New England Journal of Medicine, 2009, pp. 932-934, Aug. 27, 2009. |
RenovoCath(tm) RC120 The Future of Targeted Delivery, RenovoRx Inc., web brochure downloaded from Internet on Feb. 2, 2015. |
Cannulation of the Cardiac Lymphatic Sytem in Swine, Vazquez-Jiminez et al., European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 18 (2000) 223-232. |
Development of Repeatable Microcatheter Access Port for Intra-arterial Therapy of Liver Cancer, Yasushi Fukuoka et al., Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (2019) 42:298-303. |
Long-Term Catheterization of the Intestinal Lymph Trunk and Collection of Lymph in Neonatal Pigs, Richard R. Uwiera et al., Journal of Visualized Experiments, Mar. 2016, 109, e53457. |
Lymphaniography to Treat Postoperative Lymphatic Leakage: A Technical Review, Edward Wolfgang Lee, et al., Korean Journal of Radiology 15(6), Nov./Dec. 2014. |
Radiologic Placement of Side-hole Catheter with Tip Fixation for Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy, Toshihiro Tanaka et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003: 14:63-68. |
Superselective Retrograde Lymphatic Duct Embolization for Management of Postoperataive Lymphatic Leak, Bulent Arslan et al., Diagn Interv Radiol 2017; 23:379-380. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Application No. PCT/US19/13482 dated Jun. 10, 2019. |
Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure (TIFP) Noninvasively, Long Lian Liu et al., PLoS One | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0140892 Jul. 28, 2016. |
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 6, 2020 of application No. PCT/US 19/54406. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190111234 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62140651 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15064158 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 16219738 | US |