Patent Grant
7354696
The present invention relates to a method for making a negative-working, heat-sensitive lithographic printing plate.
Lithographic printing presses use a so-called printing master such as a printing plate which is mounted on a cylinder of the printing press. The master carries a lithographic image on its surface and a print is obtained by applying ink to said image and then transferring the ink from the master onto a receiver material, which is typically paper. In conventional, so-called “wet” lithographic printing, ink as well as an aqueous fountain solution (also called dampening liquid) are supplied to the lithographic image which consists of oleophilic (or hydrophobic, i.e. ink-accepting, water-repelling) areas as well as hydrophilic (or oleophobic, i.e. water-accepting, ink-repelling) areas. In so-called driographic printing, the lithographic image consists of ink-accepting and ink-abhesive (ink-repelling) areas and during driographic printing, only ink is supplied to the master.
Printing masters are generally obtained by the image-wise exposure and processing of an imaging material called plate precursor. In addition to the well-known photosensitive, so-called pre-sensitized plates, which are suitable for UV contact exposure through a film mask, also heat-sensitive printing plate precursors have become very popular in the late 1990s. Such thermal materials offer the advantage of daylight stability and are especially used in the so-called computer-to-plate method wherein the plate precursor is directly exposed, i.e. without the use of a film mask. The material is exposed to heat or to infrared light and the generated heat triggers a (physico-)chemical process, such as ablation, polymerization, insolubilization by crosslinking of a polymer, heat-induced solubilization, or by particle coagulation of a thermoplastic polymer latex.
Although some of these thermal processes enable plate making without wet processing, the most popular thermal plates form an image by a heat-induced solubility difference in an alkaline developer between exposed and non-exposed areas of the coating. The coating typically comprises an oleophilic binder, e.g. a phenolic resin, of which the rate of dissolution in the developer is either reduced (negative working) or increased (positive working) by the image-wise exposure. During processing, the solubility differential leads to the removal of the non-image (non-printing) areas of the coating, thereby revealing the hydrophilic support, while the image (printing) areas of the coating remain on the support. Typical examples of such plates are described in e.g. EP-A 625728, 823327, 825927, 864420, 894622 and 901902. Negative working embodiments of such thermal materials often require a pre-heat step between exposure and development as described in e.g. EP-A 625,728.
Negative working plate precursors which do not require a pre-heat step may contain an image-recording layer that works by heat-induced particle coalescence of a thermoplastic polymer latex, as described in e.g. EP-As 770 494, 770 495, 770 496 and 770 497. These patents disclose a method for making a lithographic printing plate comprising the steps of (1) image-wise exposing an imaging element comprising hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles dispersed in a hydrophilic binder and a compound capable of converting light into heat, (2) and developing the image-wise exposed element by applying fountain and/or ink.
Another plate that works by latex coalescence is described in EP-A 800,928 which discloses a heat-sensitive imaging element comprising on a hydrophilic support an image-recording layer comprising an infrared absorbing compound and hydrophobic thermoplastic particles dispersed in an alkali soluble or swellable resin which contains phenolic hydroxyl groups.
A similar plate is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,595 which discloses a heat-sensitive imaging element for making lithographic printing plates comprising on a hydrophilic surface of a lithographic base an image-recording layer comprising a compound capable of converting light into heat and hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles, which have a specific particle size and polydispersity, dispersed in a hydrophilic binder.
EP-A 514,145 and EP-A 599,510 disclose a method for forming images by direct exposure of a radiation sensitive plate comprising a coating comprising core-shell particles having a water insoluble heat softenable core compound and a shell compound which is soluble or swellable in an aqueous alkaline medium. Image-wise exposing with infrared light causes the particles to coalesce, at least partially, to form an image, and the non-coalesced particles are then selectively removed by means of an aqueous alkaline developer. Afterwards, a baking step is performed.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,692,890 discloses a radiation-imageable element comprising a hydrophilic anodized aluminium base with a surface comprising pores and an image forming layer comprising polymer particles coated on the base wherein the ratio of said pores to the average diameter of the polymer particles ranges from about 0.4:1 to 10:1.
EP-A 1,243,413 discloses a method for making a negative-working heat-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor comprising the steps of (i) applying on a lithographic base having a hydrophilic surface an aqueous dispersion comprising hydrophobic thermoplastic particles and particles of a polymer B which have a softening point lower than the glass transition temperature of said hydrophobic thermoplastic particles and (ii) heating the image-recording layer at a temperature which is higher than the softening point of polymer B and lower than the glass temperature of the hydrophobic thermoplastic particles.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,948,591 discloses a heat sensitive element for making a lithographic printing plate comprising on a base having a hydrophilic surface an image-recording layer including an infrared absorbing agent, hydrophobic thermoplastic particles and a copolymer containing acetal groups and hydroxyl groups which have at least partially reacted with a compound with at least two carboxyl groups.
A problem associated with negative-working printing plates that work according to the mechanism of heat-induced latex coalescence, is to provide both a high run-length during printing and a high sensitivity during exposure. A high run-length can be obtained by exposing the printing plate with a high heat (infrared light) dose—i.e. a high energy density—so that the latex particles in the exposed areas coalesce to a high extent, adhere firmly to the support and are thereby rendered resistant to the development where the non-exposed areas are removed from the support. However, the use of a high energy dose implies a low speed plate which requires a long exposure time and/or a high power laser. When on the other hand a low heat dose is applied, the extent of coalescence is low and the exposed areas degrade rapidly during the press run and as a result, a low run-length is obtained.
Another major problem associated with negative-working printing plates that work according to the mechanism of heat-induced latex coalescence, is the complete and profound removal (i.e. clean out) of the non-exposed areas during the development step. Further problems associated with the development step of printing plates based on heat-induced latex coalescence include the occurrence of flocculation and/or scum during processing and the appearance of stain and/or toning at the non-image areas. During the development step, the non-exposed or non-image areas of the image-recording layer should be removed by the developer solution while the exposed areas or the image-areas should remain essentially unaffected. Thus, not only should the non-image areas be removed thereby revealing the underlying hydrophilic surface of the support, but at the same time the exposed areas should not be affected to such an extent that their ink-acceptance is rendered unacceptable.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for making a negative-working, heat-sensitive lithographic printing plate based on latex coalescence without the occurrence of stain and which has excellent printing properties. This object is realized by a method for making a lithographic printing plate comprising the steps of:
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are defined in the dependent claims.
It was surprisingly found that a printing plate precursor comprising latex particles with an average particle size ranging from 45 nm to 63 nm in an amount of at least 70% by weight and a hydrophilic binder, exposed to heat or infrared light, and processed with an aqueous alkaline solution with a pH≧11 comprising a phosphate or silicate buffer, provides a printing plate without stain. Furthermore, a substantially increased press life and an improved sensitivity is obtained.
The printing plate used in the invention provides prints with an excellent image quality and no toning.
The hydrophobic thermoplastic particles are present in an image-recording layer of the coating of the lithographic printing plate precursor of the method of the present invention. The average particle size is comprised between 45 nm and 63 nm, more preferably between 45 nm and 60 nm, more preferably between 45 nm and 59 nm, even more preferably between 45 nm and 55 nm and most preferably between 48 nm and 52 nm. Herein, the particle size is defined as the particle diameter, measured by Photon Correlation Spectrometry, also known as Quasi-Elastic or Dynamic Light-Scattering. This technique is a convenient method for measuring the particle size and the values of the measured particle size match well with the particle size measured with transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) as disclosed by Stanley D. Duke et al. in Calibration of Spherical Particles by Light Scattering, in Technical Note-002B, May 15, 2000 (revised Jan. 3, 2000 from a paper published in Particulate Science and Technology 7, p. 223-228 (1989).
The amount of hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles present in the image-recording layer of the coating is at least 70% by weight, preferably at least 75% by weight and more preferably at least 80% by weight. The amount of hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles in the image-recording layer of the coating is preferably between 70% by weight and 85% by weight and more preferably between 75% by weight and 85% by weight. The weight percentage of the hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles is determined relative to the weight of all the components in the image-recording layer.
The hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles are preferably selected from polyethylene, poly(vinyl)chloride, polymethyl(meth)acrylate, polyethyl(meth)acrylate, poyvinylidene chloride, poly(meth)acrylonitrile, polyvinylcarbazole, polystyrene or copolymers thereof. According to a preferred embodiment, the thermoplastic polymer particles comprise polystyrene or derivatives thereof, mixtures comprising polystyrene and poly(meth)acrylonitrile or derivatives thereof, or copolymers comprising polystyrene and poly(meth)acrylonitrile or derivatives thereof. The latter copolymers may comprise at least 50% by weight of polystyrene, and more preferably at least 65% by weight of polystyrene. In order to obtain sufficient resistivity towards organic chemicals such as hydrocarbons used in plate cleaners, the thermoplastic polymer particles preferably comprise at least 5% by weight of nitrogen containing units as described in EP 1,219,416, more preferably at least 30% by weight of nitrogen containing units, such as (meth)acrylonitrile. According to the most preferred embodiment, the thermoplastic polymer particles consist essentially of styrene and acrylonitrile units in a weight ratio between 1:1 and 5:1 (styrene:acrylonitrile), e.g. in a 2:1 ratio.
The weight average molecular weight of the thermoplastic polymer particles may range from 5,000 to 1,000,000 g/mol.
The hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles present in the image-recording layer can be applied onto the lithographic base in the form of a dispersion in an aqueous coating liquid and may be prepared by the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,476,937 or EP 1,217,010. Another method especially suitable for preparing an aqueous dispersion of the thermoplastic polymer particles comprises:
The image-recording layer further comprises a hydrophilic binder which is preferably soluble in an aqueous having a pH≧10. Examples of suitable hydrophilic binders are homopolymers and copolymers of vinyl alcohol, acrylamide, methylol acrylamide, methylol methacrylamide, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate and maleic anhydride/vinylmethylether copolymers.
The support of the lithographic printing plate precursor has a hydrophilic surface or is provided with a hydrophilic layer. The support may be a sheet-like material such as a plate or it may be a cylindrical element such as a sleeve which can be slid around a print cylinder of a printing press. Preferably, the support is a metal support such as aluminum or stainless steel. The support can also be a laminate comprising an aluminum foil and a plastic layer, e.g. polyester film.
A particularly preferred lithographic support is an electrochemically grained and anodized aluminum support. The aluminium is preferably grained by electrochemical graining, and anodized by means of anodizing techniques employing phosphoric acid or a sulphuric acid/phosphoric acid mixture. Methods of both graining and anodization of aluminum are very well known in the art.
By graining (or roughening) the aluminium support, both the adhesion of the printing image and the wetting characteristics of the non-image areas are improved. By varying the type and/or concentration of the electrolyte and the applied voltage in the graining step, different type of grains can be obtained.
By anodising the aluminium support, its abrasion resistance and hydrophilic nature are improved. The microstructure as well as the thickness of the Al2O3 layer are determined by the anodising step, the anodic weight (g/m2 Al2O3 formed on the aluminium surface) varies between 1 and 8 g/m2.
The grained and anodized aluminum support may be post-treated to improve the hydrophilic properties of its surface. For example, the aluminum oxide surface may be silicated by treating its surface with a sodium silicate solution at elevated temperature, e.g. 95° C. Alternatively, a phosphate treatment may be applied which involves treating the aluminum oxide surface with a phosphate solution that may further contain an inorganic fluoride. Further, the aluminum oxide surface may be rinsed with an organic acid and/or salt thereof, e.g. carboxylic acids, hydrocarboxylic acids, sulphonic acids or phosphonic acids, or their salts, e.g. succinates, phosphates, phosphonates, sulphates, and sulphonates. A citric acid or citrate solution is preferred. This treatment may be carried out at room temperature or may be carried out at a slightly elevated temperature of about 30° C. to 50° C. A further interesting treatment involves rinsing the aluminum oxide surface with a bicarbonate solution. Still further, the aluminum oxide surface may be treated with polyvinylphosphonic acid, polyvinylmethylphosphonic acid, phosphoric acid esters of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylsulfonic acid, polyvinylbenzenesulfonic acid, sulfuric acid esters of polyvinyl alcohol, and acetals of polyvinyl alcohols formed by reaction with a sulfonated aliphatic aldehyde. It is further evident that one or more of these post treatments may be carried out alone or in combination. More detailed descriptions of these treatments are given in GB 1084070, DE 4423140, DE 4417907, EP 659909, EP 537633, DE 4001466, EP A 292801, EP A 291760 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,458,005.
According to another embodiment, the support can also be a flexible support, which is provided with a hydrophilic layer, hereinafter called ‘base layer’. The flexible support is e.g. paper, plastic film, thin aluminum or a laminate thereof. Preferred examples of plastic film are polyethylene terephthalate film, polyethylene naphthalate film, cellulose acetate film, polystyrene film, polycarbonate film, etc. The plastic film support may be opaque or transparent.
The base layer is preferably a cross-linked hydrophilic layer obtained from a hydrophilic binder cross-linked with a hardening agent such as formaldehyde, glyoxal, polyisocyanate or a hydrolyzed tetra-alkylorthosilicate. The latter is particularly preferred. The thickness of the hydrophilic base layer may vary in the range of 0.2 to 25 μm and is preferably 1 to 10 μm. The hydrophilic binder for use in the base layer is e.g. a hydrophilic (co)polymer such as homopolymers and copolymers of vinyl alcohol, acrylamide, methylol acrylamide, methylol methacrylamide, acrylate acid, methacrylate acid, hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate or maleic anhydride/vinylmethylether copolymers. The hydrophilicity of the (co)polymer or (co)polymer mixture used is preferably the same as or higher than the hydrophilicity of polyvinyl acetate hydrolyzed to at least an extent of 60% by weight, preferably 80% by weight. The amount of hardening agent, in particular tetraalkyl orthosilicate, is preferably at least 0.2 parts per part by weight of hydrophilic binder, more preferably between 0.5 and 5 parts by weight, most preferably between 1 parts and 3 parts by weight.
According to another embodiment the base layer may also comprise Al2O3 and an optional binder. Deposition methods for the Al2O3 onto the flexible support may be (i) physical vapor deposition including reactive sputtering, RF-sputtering, pulsed laser PVD and evaporation of aluminium, (ii) chemical vapor deposition under both vacuum and non-vacuum condition, (iii) chemical solution deposition including spray coating, dipcoating, spincoating, chemical bath deposition, selective ion layer adsorption and reaction, liquid phase deposition and electroless deposition. The Al2O3 powder can be prepared using different techniques including flame pyrolisis, ball milling, precipitation, hydrothermal synthesis, aerosol synthesis, emulsion synthesis, sol-gel synthesis (solvent based), solution-gel synthesis (water based) and gas phase synthesis. The particle size of the Al2O3 powders can vary between 2 nm and 30 μm; more preferably between 100 nm and 2 μm.
The hydrophilic base layer may also contain substances that increase the mechanical strength and the porosity of the layer. For this purpose colloidal silica may be used. The colloidal silica employed may be in the form of any commercially available water dispersion of colloidal silica for example having an average particle size up to 40 nm, e.g. 20 nm. In addition inert particles of larger size than the colloidal silica may be added e.g. silica prepared according to Stöber as described in J. Colloid and Interface Sci., Vol. 26, 1968, pages 62 to 69 or alumina particles or particles having an average size of at least 100 nm which are particles of titanium dioxide or other heavy metal oxides.
Particular examples of suitable hydrophilic base layers for use in accordance with the present invention are disclosed in EP 601240, GB 1419512, FR 2300354, U.S. Pat. No. 3,971,660, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,284,705.
An optimal ratio between pore diameter of the surface of the aluminium support (if present) and the particle size of the hydrophobic thermoplastic particles may enhance the press life of the printing plate and may improve the toning behaviour of the prints. This ratio of the average pore diameter of the surface of the aluminium support to the average particle size of the thermoplastic particles present in the image-recording layer of the coating, preferably ranges from 0.05:1 to 0.8:1, more preferably from 0.10:1 to 0.35:1.
The coating preferably also contains a compound which absorbs infrared light and converts the absorbed energy into heat. The amount of infrared absorbing agent in the coating is preferably between 0.25 and 25.0% by weight, more preferably between 0.5 and 20.0% by weight. The infrared absorbing compound can be present in the image-recording layer and/or an optional other layer. In the embodiment the infrared absorbing agent is present in the image-recording layer of the coating, its concentration is preferably at least 6% by weight, more preferably at least 8% by weight, relative to the weight of all the components in the image-recording layer. Preferred IR absorbing compounds are dyes such as cyanine, merocyanine, indoaniline, oxonol, pyrilium and squarilium dyes or pigments such as carbon black. Examples of suitable IR absorbers are described in e.g. EP-As 823327, 978376, 1029667, 1053868, 1093934; WO 97/39894 and 00/29214. A preferred compound is the following cyanine dye IR-1:
To protect the surface of the coating, in particular from mechanical damage, a protective layer may also optionally be applied. The protective layer generally comprises at least one water-soluble polymeric binder, such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetates, gelatin, carbohydrates or hydroxyethylcellulose, and can be produced in any known manner such as from an aqueous solution or dispersion which may, if required, contain small amounts, i.e. less than 5% by weight, based on the total weight of the coating solvents for the protective layer, of organic solvents. The thickness of the protective layer can suitably be any amount, advantageously up to 5.0 μm, preferably from 0.05 to 3.0 μm, particularly preferably from 0.10 to 1.0 μm.
The coating may in addition to the image-recording layer also contain one or more additional layer(s). Besides the additional layers already discussed above—i.e. an optional light-absorbing layer comprising one or more compounds that are capable of converting infrared light into heat or a protective layer such as a covering layer which is removed during processing—the coating may further comprise for example an adhesion-improving layer between the image-recording layer and the support.
Optionally, the coating may further contain additional ingredients. These ingredients may be present in the image-recording layer or in on optional other layer. For example, additional binders, polymer particles such as matting agents and spacers, surfactants such as perfluoro surfactants, silicon or titanium dioxide particles, development inhibitors, development accelerators or colorants are well-known components of lithographic coatings. Especially addition of colorants such as dyes or pigments which provide a visible color to the coating and remain in the exposed areas of the coating after the processing step, are advantageous. Thus, the image-areas which are not removed during the processing step form a visible image on the printing plate and examination of the developed printing plate already at this stage becomes feasible. Typical examples of such contrast dyes are the amino-substituted tri- or diarylmethane dyes, e.g. crystal violet, methyl violet, victoria pure blue, flexoblau 630, basonylblau 640, auramine and malachite green. Also the dyes which are discussed in depth in the detailed description of EP-A 400706 are suitable contrast dyes. Dyes which, combined with specific additives, only slightly color the coating but which become intensively colored after exposure, are also of interest.
The printing plate precursor used in the present invention is image-wise exposed directly with heat, e.g. by means of a thermal head, or indirectly by infrared light by means of e.g. LEDs or an infrared laser. The infrared light is preferably converted into heat by an IR light absorbing compound as discussed above. The heat-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor used in the present invention is preferably not sensitive to visible light. Most preferably, the coating is not sensitive to ambient daylight, i.e. visible (400-750 nm) and near UV light (300-400 nm) at an intensity and exposure time corresponding to normal working conditions so that the material can be handled without the need for a safe light environment. Preferably, the light used for the exposure is a laser emitting near infrared light having a wavelength in the range from about 700 to about 1500 nm, e.g. a semiconductor laser diode, a Nd:YAG or a Nd:YLF laser. The required laser power depends on the sensitivity of the image-recording layer, the pixel dwell time of the laser beam, which is determined by the spot diameter (typical value of modern plate-setters at 1/e2 of maximum intensity: 10-25 μm), the scan speed and the resolution of the exposure apparatus (i.e. the number of addressable pixels per unit of linear distance, often expressed in dots per inch or dpi; typical value : 1000-4000 dpi).
Two types of laser-exposure apparatuses are commonly used: internal (ITD) and external drum (XTD) plate-setters. ITD plate-setters for thermal plates are typically characterized by a very high scan speed up to 1500 m/sec and may require a laser power of several Watts. The Agfa Galileo T (trademark of Agfa Gevaert N.V.) is a typical example of a plate-setter using the ITD-technology. XTD plate-setters for thermal plates having a typical laser power from about 20 mW to about 500 mW operate at a lower scan speed, e.g. from 0.1 to 20 m/sec. The Creo Trendsetter plate-setter family (trademark of Creo) and the Agfa Xcalibur plate-setter family (trademark of Agfa Gevaert N.V.) both make use of the XTD-technology.
Due to the heat generated during the exposure step, the hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles fuse or coagulate so as to form a hydrophobic phase which corresponds to the printing areas of the printing plate. Coagulation may result from heat-induced coalescence, softening or melting of the thermoplastic polymer particles. There is no specific upper limit to the coagulation temperature of the thermoplastic hydrophobic polymer particles, however the temperature should be sufficiently below the decomposition temperature of the polymer particles. Preferably the coagulation temperature is at least 10° C. below the temperature at which the decomposition of the polymer particles occurs. The coagulation temperature is preferably higher than 50° C., more preferably above 100° C.
After exposure, the material is developed by supplying to the coating an aqueous alkaline developer solution comprising a phosphate or silicate buffer solution and having a pH≧11, whereby the non-image areas of the coating are removed. Preferably the developer solution has a pH≧12, more preferably a pH≧13. This developing with an aqueous alkaline developer solution may be combined with mechanical rubbing, e.g. by a rotating brush. During the development step, any water-soluble protective layer present is preferably also removed. Silicate-based developers which have a ratio of silicon dioxide to alkali metal oxide of at least 1 are advantageous because they ensure that the alumina layer (if present) of the substrate is not damaged. Preferred alkali metal oxides include Na2O and K2O, and mixtures thereof. A particularly preferred silicate-based developer solution is a developer solution comprising sodium or potassium metasilicate, i.e. a silicate where the ratio of silicon dioxide to alkali metal oxide is 1. The developer may optionally contain further components, such as buffer substances, complexing agents, antifoaming agents, organic solvents in small amounts, corrosion inhibitors, dyes, surfactants and/or hydrotropic agents as known in the art. Preferred surfactants include non-ionic surfactants such as Genapol C 200 (trademark from Clariant GmbH) and amphoteric surfactants such as librateric AA30 (trademark from Libra Chemicals Limited). By incorporating surfactants to the developer solution, the surface tension reduces drastically and the developer solution becomes effective—i.e. removal of the non-image areas without occurrence of stain/toning—at a lower pH compared to the same developer solution without a surfactant.
The development is preferably carried out at temperatures of from 20 to 40° C. in automated processing units as customary in the art. For regeneration, alkali metal silicate solutions having alkali metal contents of from 0.6 to 2.0 mol/l can suitably be used. These solutions may have the same silica/alkali metal oxide ratio as the developer (generally, however, it is lower) and likewise optionally contain further additives. The required amounts of regenerated material must be tailored to the developing apparatuses used, daily plate throughputs, image areas, etc. and are in general from 1 to 50 ml per square meter of plate precursor. The addition of replenisher can be regulated, for example, by measuring the conductivity of the developer as described in EP-A 0,556,690.
The development step may be followed by a rinsing step and/or a gumming step. The gumming step involves post-treatment of the lithographic printing plate with a gum solution. A gum solution is typically an aqueous liquid which comprises one or more surface protective compounds that are capable of protecting the lithographic image of a printing plate against contamination or damaging. Suitable examples of such compounds are film-forming hydrophilic polymers or surfactants.
The plate precursor can, if required, be post-treated with a suitable correcting agent or preservative as known in the art. To increase the resistance of the finished printing plate and hence to extend the run length, the layer can be briefly heated to elevated temperatures (“baking”). The plate can be dried before baking or is dried during the baking process itself. During the baking step, the plate can be heated at a temperature which is higher than the glass transition temperature of the thermoplastic particles, e.g. between 100° C. and 230° C. for a period of 40 minutes to 5 minutes. A preferred baking temperature is above 60° C. For example, the exposed and developed plates can be baked at a temperature of 230° C. for 5 minutes, at a temperature of 150° C. for 10 minutes or at a temperature of 120° C. for 30 minutes. Baking can be done in conventional hot air ovens or by irradiation with lamps emitting in the infrared or ultraviolet spectrum. As a result of this baking step, the resistance of the printing plate to plate cleaners, correction agents and UV-curable printing inks increases. Such a thermal post-treatment is described, inter alia, in DE 1,447,963 and GB 1,154,749.
The printing plate thus obtained can be used for conventional, so-called wet offset printing, in which ink and an aqueous dampening liquid is supplied to the plate. Another suitable printing method uses so-called single-fluid ink without a dampening liquid. Suitable single-fluid inks have been described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,045,232; U.S. Pat. No. 4,981,517 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,392. In a most preferred embodiment, the single-fluid ink comprises an ink phase, also called the hydrophobic or oleophilic phase, and a polyol phase as described in WO 00/32705.
Preparation of the Lithographic Substrate.
A 0.30 mm thick aluminum foil was degreased by immersing the foil in an aqueous solution containing 40 g/l of sodium hydroxide at 60° C. for 8 seconds and rinsed with demineralized water for 2 seconds. The foil was then electrochemically grained during 15 seconds using an alternating current in an aqueous solution containing 12 g/l of hydrochloric acid and 38 g/l of aluminum sulfate (18-hydrate) at a temperature of 33° C. and a current density of 130 A/dm2. After rinsing with demineralized water for 2 seconds, the aluminum foil was then desmutted by etching with an aqueous solution containing 155 g/l of sulfuric acid at 70° C. for 4 seconds and rinsed with demineralized water at 25° C. for 2 seconds. The foil was subsequently subjected to anodic oxidation during 13 seconds in an aqueous solution containing 155 g/l of sulfuric acid at a temperature of 45° C. and a current density of 22 A/dm2, then washed with demineralized water for 2 seconds and post-treated for 10 seconds with a solution containing 4 g/l of polyvinylphosphonic acid at 40° C., rinsed with demineralized water at 20° C. during 2 seconds and dried.
The support thus obtained has a surface roughness Ra of 0.21 μm and an anodic weight of 4 g/m2 of Al2O3.
Preparation of Printing Plate Precursor 1.
The printing plate precursor 1 was produced by applying a coating onto the above described lithographic substrate. The composition of the dry coating is defined in Table 1. The coating was applied from an aqueous coating solution and a dry coating weight of 0.84 g/m2 was obtained.
Imaging and Processing of the Printing Plate Precursor and Print Results.
The plate precursor 1 was exposed with a Creo Trendsetter 2344T (40 W) (plate-setter available from Creo, Burnaby, Canada), operating at 200 mJ/cm2 and 150 rpm.
After imaging, the plate precursor was processed in an Agfa VA88 processor, operating at a speed of 1 m/min and at 23° C., using a carbonate based buffer solution (Table 2) with varying pH. After development, the plates were gummed with RC795 (trademark from Agfa).
The occurrence of stain on the obtained printing plates was determined (Dmin).
The high Dmin values in Table 2 indicate that a developer solution comprising a carbonate based buffer results in an unacceptable high stain. A Dmin value<0.1 is defined as no stain. Furthermore, the results show that the pH of the developer solution has no significant effect on the Dmin value.
The printing plate precursor 1 prepared as described in Comparative Example 1 was processed in an Agfa VA88 processor, operating at a speed of 1 m/min and at 23° C., using a phosphate buffer (Invention Example 2, Table 3) or a silicate buffer (Invention Example 3, Table 4). After development, the plates were gummed with RC795 (trademark from Agfa).
The occurrence of stain on the obtained printing plates was determined (Dmin).
The data in Table 3 indicate that the pH of the developer solution comprising a phosphate buffer has a large effect on stain (Dmin). A Dmin value of Dmin<0,1 defined as no stain is obtained at a pH of 11 or higher.
The data in Table 4 indicate that the pH of the developer solution comprising a silicate has a large effect on stain (Dmin). A Dmin value of <0,1 defined as no stain is obtained at a pH of 11.81 or higher.
Preparation of the Lithographic Substrate.
A 0.30 mm thick aluminum foil was degreased by immersing the foil in an aqueous solution containing 40 g/l of sodium hydroxide at 60° C. for 8 seconds and rinsed with demineralized water for 2 seconds. The foil was then electrochemically grained during 15 seconds using an alternating current in an aqueous solution containing 12 g/l of hydrochloric acid and 38 g/l of aluminum sulfate (18-hydrate) at a temperature of 33° C. and a current density of 130 A/dm2. After rinsing with demineralized water for 2 seconds, the aluminum foil was then desmutted by etching with an aqueous solution containing 155 g/l of sulfuric acid at 70° C. for 4 seconds and rinsed with demineralized water at 25° C. for 2 seconds. The foil was subsequently subjected to anodic oxidation during 13 seconds in an aqueous solution containing 155 g/l of sulfuric acid at a temperature of 45° C. and a current density of 22 A/dm2, then washed with demineralized water for 2 seconds and post-treated for 10 seconds with a solution containing 4 g/l of polyvinylphosphonic acid at 40° C., rinsed with demineralized water at 20° C. during 2 seconds and dried.
The support thus obtained has a surface roughness Ra of 0.21 μm and an anodic weight of 4 g/m2 of Al2O3.
Preparation of the Printing Plate Precursors 2-7.
Printing plate precursors 2 to 7 were produced by applying a coating solution onto the above described lithographic substrate. The composition of the coating is defined in Table 5. The average particle sizes of the styrene/acrylonitrile copolymers were measured with a Brookhaven BI-90 analyzer, commercially available from Brookhaven Instrument Company, Holtsville, N.Y., USA, and are indicated in Table 6. The coating was applied from an aqueous coating solution and a dry coating weight of 0.84 g/m2 was obtained.
Imaging and Processing of the Printing Plate Precursors 2-7.
The plate precursors 2-7 were exposed with a Creo Trendsetter 2344T (40 W) (plate-setter, trademark from Creo, Burnaby, Canada), operating at 200 mJ/cm2 and 150 rpm.
After imaging, the plate precursors were processed in an Agfa VA88 processor (trademark from Agfa), operating at a speed of 1 m/min and at 22° C., using Agfa PD91 (trademark from Agfa) as developer solution.
PD91 is a buffer solution comprising potassium metasilicate, Genapol C200 (surfactant commercially available from Clariant GmbH, Frankfurt am Main Germany) and Librateric AA30 (surfactant commercially available from Libra Chemicals Limited, Manchester UK) and has a pH=13.
After development, the plates were gummed with RC795 (trademark from Agfa).
Print Results.
The plates were mounted on a GTO46 printing press (available from Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG), and a print job was started using K+E Novavit 800 Skinnex ink (trademark of BASF Drucksysteme GmbH) and 3% FS101 in 10% isopropanol as a fountain liquid.
The lithographic properties of the plates were determined by visual inspection of the appearance of toning in the non-image areas of the plates and the quality of the coating was determined in terms of run-length (Table 6). An excellent run lenght resistance (++) means that after 100,000 prints the 1% highlight of a 200 lpi screen was still rendered on the print and a good run lenght resistance (+) means that after 100,000 prints the 2% highlight of a 200 lpi screen was still rendered on the print. An insufficient run lenght resistance (−) means that after 1,000 prints breakdown of the highlight of a 200 lpi screen occured.
The results in Table 6 demonstrate that the plates, comprising a latex with an average particle size between 45 nm and 61 nm, have no toning or only slightly toning when processed with a developer containing a silicate buffer. The plate comprising a latex with an average particle size below 45 nm shows toning and the plates with an average particle size of 77 nm or 83 nm have a reduced run length.
Preparation of the Lithographic Substrate.
The preparation of the lithographic substrate was done according to Example 4.
Preparation of the Printing Plate Precursors 8-11.
The printing plate precursors 8 to 11 were produced by applying a coating onto the above described lithographic substrate. The composition of the coating is defined in Table 7. The average particle sizes of the styrene/acrylonitrile copolymers were measured with a Brookhaven BI-90 analyzer, commercially available from Brookhaven Instrument Company, Holtsville, N.Y., USA, and are indicated in Table 8. The coating was applied from an aqueous coating solution and a dry coating weight of 0.84 g/m2 was obtained.
Imaging and Processing of the Printing Plate Precursors 8-11.
The plate precursors 8-11 were exposed with a Creo Trendsetter 2344T (40 W) (plate-setter available from Creo, Burnaby, Canada), operating at 150 rpm and varying energy densities upto 250 mJ/cm2.
After imaging, the plates were processed in an Agfa VA88 processor, operating at a speed of 1 m/min and at 25° C., and using Agfa PD91 (trademark from Agfa) as developer solution.
PD91 is a buffer solution comprising potassium metasilicate, Genapol C200 (surfactant commercially available from Clariant GmbH, Frankfurt am Main Germany) and Librateric AA30 (surfactant commercially available from Libra Chemicals Limited, Manchester UK) and has a pH=13.
After development, the plates were gummed with RC795 (trademark from Agfa).
Print Results.
The plates were mounted on a GTO46 printing press (available from Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG) and a print job was started using K+E Novavit 800 Skinnex ink (trademark of BASF Drucksysteme GmbH) and 4% Combifix XL with 10% isopropanol as a fountain liquid.
The sensitivity of the plate precursors was determined and is summarized in Table 8.
The results demonstrate that the plates, comprising a latex with an average particle size of 51 nm or 63 nm, processed with a developer containing a silicate buffer, have a high sensitivity. The plate comprising a latex with an average particle size of 41 nm results in flocculation and the plate with an average particle size of 79 nm results in a too low sensitivity (sensitivity>>250 mJ/cm2).
Preparation of the Lithographic Substrate.
The preparation of the lithographic substrate was done according to Example 4.
Preparation of the Printing Plate Precursors 12-17.
The printing plate precursors 12 to 17 were produced by applying a coating onto the above described lithographic substrate. The composition of the coating is defined in Table 9. The coating was applied from an aqueous coating solution and a dry coating weight of 0.84 g/m2 was obtained.
Imaging and Processing of the Printing Plate Precursors 12-17.
The plate precursors 12-17 were exposed with a Creo Trendsetter 2344T (40 W) (plate-setter available from Creo, Burnaby, Canada), operating at 260 mJ/m2 150 rpm.
After imaging, the plates were processed in an Agfa VA88 processor, operating at a speed of 1 m/min and at 25° C., and using Agfa PD91 (trademark from Agfa) as developer solution. PD91 is a buffer solution comprising potassium metasilicate, Genapol C200 (surfactant commercially available from Clariant GmbH, Frankfurt am Main Germany) and Librateric AA30 (surfactant commercially available from Libra Chemicals Limited, Manchester UK) and has a pH=13.
After development, the plates were gummed with RC795 (trademark from Agfa).
Print Results.
The plates were mounted on a GTO46 printing press (available from Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG) and a print job was started using K+E Novavit 800 Skinnex ink (trademark of BASF Drucksysteme GmbH) and 3% FS101 (trademark from Agfa) with 10% isopropanol as a fountain liquid.
The occurrence of stain (Dmin) and toning on the non-image areas of the plate was determined and is summarized in Table 10.
The results demonstrate that the plates, comprising a latex with an average particle size of 52 nm, in a concentration of 75%, 79%, 83% or 85%, processed with a developer containing a silicate buffer, have no stain and no toning. The plates, comprising a latex concentration of 65% wt, do not provide a good image quality.
Preparation of the Lithographic Substrate.
The preparation of the lithographic substrate was done according to Example 4.
Preparation of the Printing Plate Precursors 18-21.
The printing plate precursors 18 to 21 were produced by applying a coating onto the above described lithographic substrate. The composition of the coating is defined in Table 11. The coating was applied from an aqueous coating solution and a dry coating weight of 0.84 g/m2 was obtained.
Imaging and Processing of the Printing Plate Precursors 18-21.
The plate precursors 18-21 were exposed with a Creo Trendsetter 2344T (40 W) (plate-setter available from Creo, Burnaby, Canada), operating at 150 rpm.
After imaging, the plates were processed in an Agfa VA88 processor, operating at a speed of 1 m/min and at 25° C., and using Agfa PD91 (trademark from Agfa) as developer solution. PD91 is a buffer solution comprising potassium metasilicate, Genapol C200 (surfactant commercially available from Clariant GmbH, Frankfurt am Main Germany) and Librateric AA30 (surfactant commercially available from Libra Chemicals Limited, Manchester UK) and has a pH=13.
After development, the plates were gummed with RC795 (trademark from Agfa).
Print Results.
The plates were mounted on a GTO46 printing press (available from Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG) and a print job was started using K+E Novavit 800 Skinnex ink (trademark of BASF Drucksysteme GmbH) and 3% FS101 (trademark from Agfa) with 10% isopropanol as a fountain liquid.
The occurrence of stain and toning on the non-image areas of the plate was determined and is summarized in Table 12.
The results demonstrate that the plates, comprising a latex with an average particle size of 52 nm, in a concentration of 75%, or 83%, processed with a developer containing a silicate buffer, have no stain and no toning. The plates, comprising a latex concentration of 65% wt, do not provide a good image quality.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04103247 | Jul 2004 | EP | regional |
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/587,999 filed Jul. 14, 2004, which is incorporated by reference. In addition, this application claims the benefit of European Application No. 04103247.5 filed Jul. 8, 2004, which is also incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3476937 | Gevaert | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3615480 | Lam | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3647462 | Surash et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3890152 | Ruckert et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3930857 | Bendz et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3971660 | Staehle | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4045232 | Parkinson | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4284705 | Phlipot et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4458005 | Mohr et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4840713 | Pliefke | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4897168 | Boergerding et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4981517 | DeSanto, Jr. et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5026677 | Vanmaele | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5156723 | Pliefke et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5314787 | Elsaesser et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5556531 | Wiedemann | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5637441 | Brenk et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5716743 | Stein et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5930547 | Stein et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5948591 | Vermeersch et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6140392 | Kingman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6420083 | Kawamura | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6427595 | Van Damme et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6492093 | Gaschler et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6692890 | Huang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 20020006575 | Gaschler et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119404 | Fiebag et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20060014104 | Vermeersch et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019200 | Vermeersch et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 447 963 | Nov 1968 | DE |
| 40 01 466 | Jul 1991 | DE |
| 44 17 907 | Nov 1995 | DE |
| 44 23 140 | Jan 1996 | DE |
| 0 291 760 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 0 292 801 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 0 400 706 | Dec 1990 | EP |
| 0 514 145 | Nov 1992 | EP |
| 0 537 633 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0 556 690 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 599 510 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0 601 240 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0 625 728 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0 659 909 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0 770 497 | Oct 1995 | EP |
| 0 770 494 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0 770 495 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0 770 496 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0 800 928 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 816 070 | Jan 1998 | EP |
| 0 823 327 | Feb 1998 | EP |
| 0 864 420 | Sep 1998 | EP |
| 0 881 094 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 0 894 622 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 0 901 902 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0 978 376 | Feb 2000 | EP |
| 1 029 667 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1 053 868 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1 093 934 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1 217 010 | Jun 2002 | EP |
| 1 219 416 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 1 243 413 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1 266 753 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1 276 013 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1 281 514 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 23 00 354 | Sep 1976 | FR |
| 1 084 070 | Sep 1967 | GB |
| 1 154 749 | Jun 1969 | GB |
| 1 419 512 | Dec 1975 | GB |
| 11 038643 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| WO 9739894 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO 0029214 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO 0032705 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060014103 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60587999 | Jul 2004 | US |
