Patent Application
20080199812
The present invention relates to a method for making a heat-sensitive, negative-working lithographic printing plate precursor.
Lithographic printing presses use a so-called printing master such as a printing plate which is mounted on a cylinder of the printing press. The master carries a lithographic image on its surface and a print is obtained by applying ink to said image and then transferring the ink from the master onto a receiver material, which is typically paper. In conventional, so-called “wet” lithographic printing, ink as well as an aqueous fountain solution (also called dampening liquid) are supplied to the lithographic image which consists of oleophilic (or hydrophobic, i.e. ink-accepting, water-repelling) areas as well as hydrophilic (or oleophobic, i.e. water-accepting, ink-repelling) areas. In so-called driographic printing, the lithographic image consists of ink-accepting and ink-abhesive (ink-repelling) areas and during driographic printing, only ink is supplied to the master.
Printing masters are generally obtained by the image-wise exposure and processing of an imaging material called plate precursor. In addition to the well-known photosensitive, so-called pre-sensitized plates, which are suitable for UV contact exposure through a film mask, also heat-sensitive printing plate precursors have become very popular in the late 1990s. Such thermal materials offer the advantage of daylight stability and are especially used in the so-called computer-to-plate method wherein the plate precursor is directly exposed, i.e. without the use of a film mask. The material is exposed to heat or to infrared light and the generated heat triggers a (physico-)chemical process, such as ablation, polymerization, insolubilization by crosslinking of a polymer, heat-induced solubilization, or by particle coagulation of a thermoplastic polymer latex.
Although some of these thermal processes enable plate making without wet processing, the most popular thermal plates form an image by a heat-induced solubility difference in an alkaline developer between exposed and non-exposed areas of the coating. The coating typically comprises an oleophilic binder, e.g. a phenolic resin, of which the rate of dissolution in the developer is either reduced (negative working) or increased (positive working), by the image-wise exposure. During processing, the solubility differential leads to the removal of the non-image (non-printing) areas of the coating, thereby revealing the hydrophilic support, while the image (printing) areas of the coating remain on the support. Typical examples of such plates are described in e.g. EP-A 625728, 823327, 825927, 864420, 894622 and 901902. Negative working embodiments of such thermal materials often require a pre-heat step between exposure and development as described in e.g. EP-A 625,728.
Negative working plate precursors which do not require a pre-heat step may contain an image-recording layer that works by heat-induced particle coalescence of a thermoplastic polymer latex, as described in e.g. EP-As 770 494, 770 495, 770 496 and 770 497. These patents disclose a method for making a lithographic printing plate comprising the steps of (1) image-wise exposing an imaging element comprising hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles dispersed in a hydrophilic binder and a compound capable of converting light into heat, (2) and developing the image-wise exposed element by applying fountain and/or ink.
Another plate that works by latex coalescence is described in EP-A 800,928 which discloses a heat-sensitive imaging element comprising on a hydrophilic support an image-recording layer comprising an infrared absorbing compound and hydrophobic thermoplastic particles dispersed in an alkali soluble or swellable resin which contains phenolic hydroxyl groups.
A similar plate is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,595 which discloses a heat-sensitive imaging element for making lithographic printing plates comprising on a hydrophilic surface of a lithographic base an image-recording layer comprising a compound capable of converting light into heat and hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles, which have a specific particle size and polydispersity, dispersed in a hydrophilic binder.
EP-A 514,145 and EP-A 599,510 disclose a method for forming images by direct exposure of a radiation sensitive plate comprising a coating comprising core-shell particles having a water insoluble heat softenable core compound and a shell compound which is soluble or swellable in an aqueous alkaline medium. Image-wise exposing with infrared light causes the particles to coalesce, at least partially, to form an image, and the non-coalesced particles are then selectively removed by means of an aqueous alkaline developer. Afterwards, a baking step is performed.
EP 950 517 discloses a lithographic printing plate precursor consisting of a lithographic base with a hydrophilic surface and an IR-sensitive top layer comprising a polymer soluble in an aqueous alkaline solution and a polysiloxane surfactant.
EP 1 462 252 discloses a positive-working heat-sensitive printing plate precursor comprising on a support having a hydrophilic surface, a coating comprising a cross-linked polysiloxane spacer particle with a particle size between 1 and 15 μm, an infrared absorbing agent, an oleophilic resin soluble in an aqueous alkaline solution and a developer resistance means.
EP-A 1,243,413 discloses a method for making a negative-working heat-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor comprising the steps of (i) applying on a lithographic base having a hydrophilic surface an aqueous dispersion comprising hydrophobic thermoplastic particles and particles of a polymer B which have a softening point lower than the glass transition temperature of said hydrophobic thermoplastic particles and (ii) heating the image-recording layer at a temperature which is higher than the softening point of polymer B and lower than the glass temperature of the hydrophobic thermoplastic particles.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,948,591 discloses a heat sensitive element for making a lithographic printing plate comprising on a base having a hydrophilic surface an image-recording layer including an infrared absorbing agent, hydrophobic thermoplastic particles and a copolymer containing acetal groups and hydroxyl groups which have at least partially reacted with a compound with at least two carboxyl groups.
EP 832,739 discloses a heat-sensitive element comprising on a support having an ink-accepting surface an image-forming layer containing hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles and a compound capable of converting light into heat, and a cured ink-repellent surface layer.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,737,220 discloses a printing plate precursor comprising a support onto which a coating liquid containing thermoplastic particles and a water-soluble material such as a saccharide is applied; said coating liquid may comprise a water-soluble silicon or fluorine containing surfactant to improve its coatability.
EP 849 090 discloses an imaging element for making a lithographic printing plate comprising on a flexible support (i) an ink-repellent layer comprising a cross-linked hydrophilic binder, (ii) a thermo-sensitive layer comprising hydrophobic thermoplastic particles dispersed in a hydrophilic binder and (iii) an outermost layer on top of said layers comprising a solid or liquid lubricant in a hydrophilic binder.
EP 1,428,676 discloses a printing material comprising on an aluminium support an image forming layer comprising thermoplastic particles and a light-to-heat conversion dye; said imaging forming layer may further comprise a water-soluble resin and/or a water-soluble silicon or fluorine atom-containing surfactant.
Printing plate precursors are susceptible to damage caused by mechanical forces applied to the surface of the coating during automatic transport, mechanical handling and/or manual handling. The risk of damage occurs especially before and after the imaging step prior to the processing step. In a typical platesetter the plate precursors are conveyed by mechanical means—e.g. rollers or suction cups/devices which are applied to the surface of the precursors and thereby may cause damage to the coating. Rollers may for example cause latex particles to partially coalesce thereby forming ink-accepting areas at non-image areas while suction cups may destroy the coating resulting in disturbed image areas. Furthermore, after coating and drying the thermal printing plates are stacked and are then, by means of specified packaging equipment, cut and packed in boxes. During cutting and packing of the printing plate precursors as well as during transport of the packed printing plate precursors, the plates can move relatively to each other whereby the heat-sensitive coating is rubbed which also may result in surface damage. Moreover, the manual handling of the printing plate precursors may result in so-called fingerprints which leads to a reduced printing quality.
Thus, the major problems associated with the prior art plate materials that work by latex coalescence, is that they are easily damaged by automatic plate handling systems and/or by mechanical and manual contact; this damage results in a reduced printing quality due to a destruction of the surface of the coating of the printing plate precursor or to a pressure-induced coalescence of the latex particles in the image recording layer.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for making a negative-working, heat-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor based on latex coalescence with improved handling characteristics, i.e. a printing plate precursor which is less sensitive to damage by pressure, abrasion, fingerprints or suction cups.
This object is realized by claim 1—i.e. by a method for making a heat-sensitive negative-working lithographic printing plate precursor comprising the steps of
It was found that the presence of the polymer comprising siloxane and/or perfluoroalkyl monomeric units in the coating reduces the sensitivity of the coating to damage.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are defined in the dependent claims.
The coating solution that is used in the method of the present invention comprises a polymer comprising siloxane and/or perfluoroalkyl monomeric units. These polymers are typically water-repellent and are preferably present in the coating in an amount between 0.5 and 60 mg/m2, more preferably between 0.5 and 45 mg/m2 and most preferably between 0.5 and 30 mg/m2. Addition of higher amounts may result in a too high resistance towards an aqueous developer. The polymer comprising siloxane and/or perfluoroalkyl monomeric units may be a linear, cyclic or complex cross-linked polymer or copolymer. The polymer comprising siloxane monomeric units, hereinafter also referred to as polysiloxane, includes any polymer that contains more than one siloxane unit or group —Si(R,R′)—O—, wherein R and R′ are optionally substituted alkyl or aryl groups. Preferred siloxanes are phenylalkylsiloxanes and dialkylsiloxanes. The polymer comprising perfluoroalkyl monomeric units includes any polymer that contains more than one perfluoroalkyl unit —(CF2)—. The number of perfluoroalkyl or siloxane monomeric units in the polymer is at least 2, preferably at least 10, more preferably at least 20. It may be less than 100, preferably less than 60.
In a preferred embodiment, the polymer comprising siloxane and/or perfluoroalkyl monomeric units is a block-copolymer or a graft-copolymer comprising a poly- or (oligo)alkylene oxide block and a block comprising siloxane and/or perfluoroalkyl monomeric units. The block comprising the siloxane and/or perfluoroalkyl monomeric units may be a linear, branched, cyclic or complex cross-linked polymer or copolymer.
The perfluoroalkyl unit and the polysiloxane unit of the block-copolymer or graft-copolymer are as described above.
The alkylene block preferably includes units of the formula —CnH2n—O— wherein n is preferably an integer in the range 2 to 5. The moiety —CnH2n— may include straight or branched chains. The alkylene moiety may also comprise optional substituents.
A suitable polysiloxane is preferably a random or block-copolymer comprising siloxane and alkyleneoxide groups, suitably comprising about 15 to 25 siloxane units and 50 to 70 alkyleneoxide groups. Preferred embodiments and explicit examples of such polymers have been disclosed in WO99/21725. Preferred examples include copolymers comprising phenylmethylsiloxane and/or dimethylsiloxane as well as ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide and are commercially available.
The polymer comprising siloxane and/or perfluoroalkyl monomeric units is present in the layer comprising the hydrophobic thermoplastic particles and the hydrophilic binder—i.e. the imaging layer. According to the method of the present invention, a coating solution comprising an infrared absorbing agent, the polymer comprising siloxane and/or perfluoroalkyl monomeric units, hydrophobic thermoplastic particles and a hydrophilic binder is applied onto a support having a hydrophilic surface or which is provided with a hydrophilic layer.
The hydrophobic thermoplastic particles present in the coating preferably have an average particle size comprised between 15 nm and 150 nm, more preferably between 45 nm and 100 nm, even more preferably between 45 nm and 80 nm and most preferably between 48 nm and 58 nm.
The amount of hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles present in the coating is preferably at least 70% by weight, more preferably at least 75% by weight and most preferably at least 80% by weight. Alternatively, the amount of hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles in the coating is preferably between 70% by weight and 84% by weight and more preferably between 75% by weight and 84% by weight. The weight percentage of the hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles is determined relative to all the components of the coating.
The hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles are preferably selected from polyethylene, poly(vinyl)chloride, polymethyl(meth)acrylate, polyethyl (meth)acrylate, poyvinylidene chloride, poly(meth)acrylonitrile, polyvinylcarbazole, polystyrene or copolymers thereof. According to a preferred embodiment, the thermoplastic polymer particles comprise polystyrene or derivatives thereof, mixtures comprising polystyrene and poly(meth)acrylonitrile or derivatives thereof, or copolymers comprising polystyrene and poly(meth)acrylonitrile or derivatives thereof. The latter copolymers may comprise at least 50% by weight of polystyrene, and more preferably at least 65% by weight of polystyrene. In order to obtain sufficient resistivity towards organic chemicals such as hydrocarbons used in plate cleaners, the thermoplastic polymer particles preferably comprise at least 0.1% by weight of nitrogen as described in EP 1,219,416. A preferred example is (meth)acrylonitrile. According to the most preferred embodiment, the thermoplastic polymer particles consist essentially of styrene and acrylonitrile units in a weight ratio between 1:1 and 5:1 (styrene:acrylonitrile), e.g. in a 2:1 ratio.
The weight average molecular weight of the thermoplastic polymer particles may range from 5,000 to 1,000,000 g/mol.
The hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles present in the coating can be applied onto the lithographic base in the form of a dispersion in an aqueous coating liquid and may be prepared by the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,476,937 or EP 1,217,010. Another method especially suitable for preparing an aqueous dispersion of the thermoplastic polymer particles comprises:
The coating further comprises a hydrophilic binder which is preferably soluble in an aqueous developer. Examples of suitable hydrophilic binders are homopolymers and copolymers of vinyl alcohol, acrylamide, methylol acrylamide, methylol methacrylamide, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate and maleic anhydride/vinylmethylether copolymers.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the coating further comprises spacer particles. The spacer particles may be inorganic or organic particles.
Inorganic spacer particles include for example silicon-, titanium-, aluminum-, zinc-, iron-, chromium- or zirconium containing particles, metal oxides or hydroxides thereof, aluminiumsilicates, and metal salts such as calcium carbonate, barium sulfate, barium titanate and strontium titanate.
Examples of organic spacer particles include optionally cross-linked polyalkyl(meth)acrylate such as polymethylmethacrylate, polystyrene, melamine, polyolefins such as polyethylene or polypropylene, halogenated polyolefins such as fluorinated polyolefins for example polytetrafluoroethylene, silicones such as cross-linked polysiloxane particles, or copolymers thereof. Examples of polysiloxane particles include cross-linked polyalkylsiloxanes such as polymethylsiloxane. Commercially available cross-linked polysiloxane particles are for example Tospearl from TOSHIBA SILICONE Co.,Ltd.
The spacer particles have preferably a particle size larger than 0.5 μm, more preferably a particle size larger than 0.8 μm, most preferably equal to or larger than 1.0 μm. The particle size is preferably comprised between 0.5 μm and 15 μm, more preferably between 0.5 μm and 7 μm, most preferably between 0.8 μm and 5 μm. The particle size refers to the average particle size and may be measured by a laser diffraction particle analyzer such as the Coulter LS Particle Size Analyzer, e.g. the Coulter LS-230, commercially available by Beckman Coulter Inc. The average particle size is defined as the mean or median of the volume distribution of particle size.
By adding the spacer particles to the coating, the resistance of the coating against manual or mechanical damage is further improved. For obtaining a significant effect, the spacer particles preferably have a diameter, which is greater than the thickness of the coating. The coating has preferably a layer thickness greater than 0.5 μm, more preferably the layer thickness is comprised between 0.6 μm and 2.8 μm. The particle size of the spacer particles is preferably comprised between one to two times the thickness of the coating.
According to the present invention, the amount of the particles in the coating layer is preferably comprised between 8 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2, more preferably between 10 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2, most preferably between 20 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2.
When the coating comprises more than one distinct layers, at least one of these layers may comprise the spacer particles. The spacer particles may be present in the imaging layer and/or in an optional other layer.
The support of the lithographic printing plate precursor has a hydrophilic surface or is provided with a hydrophilic layer. The support may be a sheet-like material such as a plate or it may be a cylindrical element such as a sleeve which can be slid around a print cylinder of a printing press. Preferably, the support is a metal support such as aluminum or stainless steel. The support can also be a laminate comprising an aluminum foil and a plastic layer, e.g. polyester film.
A particularly preferred lithographic support is an electrochemically grained and anodized aluminum support. The aluminium is preferably grained by electrochemical graining, and anodized by means of anodizing techniques employing phosphoric acid or a sulphuric acid/phosphoric acid mixture. Methods of both graining and anodization of aluminum are very well known in the art.
By graining (or roughening) the aluminium support, both the adhesion of the printing image and the wetting characteristics of the non-image areas are improved. By varying the type and/or concentration of the electrolyte and the applied voltage in the graining step, different type of grains can be obtained.
By anodising the aluminium support, its abrasion resistance and hydrophilic nature are improved. The microstructure as well as the thickness of the Al2O3 layer are determined by the anodising step, the anodic weight (g/m2 Al2O3 formed on the aluminium surface) varies between 1 and 8 g/m2.
The grained and anodized aluminum support may be post-treated to improve the hydrophilic properties of its surface. For example, the aluminum oxide surface may be silicated by treating its surface with a sodium silicate solution at elevated temperature, e.g. 95° C. Alternatively, a phosphate treatment may be applied which involves treating the aluminum oxide surface with a phosphate solution that may further contain an inorganic fluoride. Further, the aluminum oxide surface may be rinsed with an organic acid and/or salt thereof, e.g. carboxylic acids, hydrocarboxylic acids, sulphonic acids or phosphonic acids, or their salts, e.g. succinates, phosphates, phosphonates, sulphates, and sulphonates. A citric acid or citrate solution is preferred. This treatment may be carried out at room temperature or may be carried out at a slightly elevated temperature of about 30° C. to 50° C. A further interesting treatment involves rinsing the aluminum oxide surface with a bicarbonate solution. Still further, the aluminum oxide surface may be treated with polyvinylphosphonic acid, polyvinylmethylphosphonic acid, phosphoric acid esters of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylsulfonic acid, polyvinylbenzenesulfonic acid, sulfuric acid esters of polyvinyl alcohol, and acetals of polyvinyl alcohols formed by reaction with a sulfonated aliphatic aldehyde. It is further evident that one or more of these post treatments may be carried out alone or in combination. More detailed descriptions of these treatments are given in GB 1084070, DE 4423140, DE 4417907, EP 659909, EP 537633, DE 4001466, EP A 292801, EP A 291760 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,458,005.
According to another embodiment, the support can also be a flexible support, which is provided with a hydrophilic layer, hereinafter called ‘base layer’. The flexible support is e.g. paper, plastic film, thin aluminum or a laminate thereof. Preferred examples of plastic film are polyethylene terephthalate film, polyethylene naphthalate film, cellulose acetate film, polystyrene film, polycarbonate film, etc. The plastic film support may be opaque or transparent.
The base layer is preferably a cross-linked hydrophilic layer obtained from a hydrophilic binder cross-linked with a hardening agent such as formaldehyde, glyoxal, polyisocyanate or a hydrolyzed tetra-alkylorthosilicate. The latter is particularly preferred. The thickness of the hydrophilic base layer may vary in the range of 0.2 to 25 μm and is preferably 1 to 10 μm. Particular examples of suitable hydrophilic base layers for use in accordance with the present invention are disclosed in EP 601240, GB 1419512, FR 2300354, U.S. Pat. No. 3,971,660, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,284,705.
An optimal ratio between pore diameter of the surface of the aluminium support (if present) and the average particle size of the hydrophobic thermoplastic particles may enhance the press life of the printing plate and may improve the toning behaviour of the prints. This ratio of the average pore diameter of the surface of the aluminium support to the average particle size of the thermoplastic particles present in the image-recording layer of the coating, preferably ranges from 0.05:1 to 0.8:1, more preferably from 0.10:1 to 0.35:1.
The coating further contains a compound which absorbs infrared light and converts the absorbed energy into heat. The amount of infrared absorbing agent in the coating is preferably between 0.25 and 25.0% by weight, more preferably between 0.5 and 20.0% by weight. In a preferred embodiment, its concentration is at least 4% by weight, more preferred at least 6% by weight. When the coating comprises more than one distinct layers, at least one of these layers may comprise the infrared absorbing agent. The infrared absorbing agent is preferably present in the imaging layer and/or in an optional other layer. Preferred IR absorbing agents are dyes such as cyanine, merocyanine, indoaniline, oxonol, pyrilium and squarilium dyes or pigments such as carbon black. Examples of suitable IR absorbers are described in e.g. EP-As 823327, 978376, 1029667, 1053868, 1093934; WO 97/39894 and 00/29214. A preferred compound is the following cyanine dye IR-1:
To further protect the surface of the coating a protective layer may also optionally be applied. The protective layer generally comprises at least one water-soluble polymeric binder, such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetates, gelatin, carbohydrates or hydroxyethylcellulose, and can be produced in any known manner such as from an aqueous solution or dispersion which may, if required, contain small amounts, i.e. less than 5% by weight, based on the total weight of the coating.
The coating may in addition to the layers already discussed above further comprise for example an adhesion-improving layer between the coating and the support.
Optionally, the coating may further contain additional ingredients such as for example additional binders or colorants. Especially addition of colorants such as dyes or pigments which provide a visible color to the coating and remain in the exposed areas of the coating after the processing step, are advantageous. Thus, the image-areas which are not removed during the processing step form a visible image on the printing plate and examination of the developed printing plate already at this stage becomes feasible. Typical examples of such contrast dyes are the amino-substituted tri- or diarylmethane dyes, e.g. crystal violet, methyl violet, victoria pure blue, flexoblau 630, basonylblau 640, auramine and malachite green. Also the dyes which are discussed in depth in the detailed description of EP-A 400,706 are suitable contrast dyes. Dyes which, combined with specific additives, only slightly color the coating but which become intensively colored after exposure, are also of interest. If the coating comprises mote than one layer, these colorants may be present in the image-recording layer and/or in on optional other layer.
The printing plate precursor according to the method of the present invention can be image-wise exposed by infrared light, preferably near infrared light. The infrared light is preferably converted into heat by an IR light absorbing compound as discussed above. The heat-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor of the present invention is preferably not sensitive to visible light. Most preferably, the coating is not sensitive to ambient daylight, i.e. visible (400-750 nm) and near UV light (300-400 nm) at an intensity and exposure time corresponding to normal working conditions so that the material can be handled without the need for a safe light environment.
The printing plate precursor can be exposed to infrared light by means of e.g. LEDs or an infrared laser. Preferably, the light used for the exposure is a laser emitting near infrared light having a wavelength in the range from about 700 to about 1500 nm, e.g. a semiconductor laser diode, a Nd:YAG or a Nd:YLF laser. The required laser power depends on the sensitivity of the image-recording layer, the pixel dwell time of the laser beam, which is determined by the spot diameter (typical value of modern plate-setters at 1/e2 of maximum intensity: 10-25 μm), the scan speed and the resolution of the exposure apparatus (i.e. the number of addressable pixels per unit of linear distance, often expressed in dots per inch or dpi; typical value: 1000-4000 dpi).
Two types of laser-exposure apparatuses are commonly used: internal (ITD) and external drum (XTD) plate-setters. ITD plate-setters for thermal plates are typically characterized by a very high scan speed up to 1500 m/sec and may require a laser power of several Watts. The Agfa Galileo T (trademark of Agfa Gevaert N.V.) is a typical example of a plate-setter using the ITD-technology. XTD plate-setters for thermal plates having a typical laser power from about 20 mW to about 500 mW operate at a lower scan speed, e.g. from 0.1 to 20 m/sec. The Creo Trendsetter plate-setter family (trademark of Creo) and the Agfa Xcalibur plate-setter family (trademark of Agfa Gevaert N.V.) both make use of the XTD-technology.
Due to the heat generated during the exposure step, the hydrophobic thermoplastic polymer particles fuse or coagulate so as to form a hydrophobic phase which corresponds to the printing areas of the printing plate. Coagulation may result from heat-induced coalescence, softening or melting of the thermoplastic polymer particles. There is no specific upper limit to the coagulation temperature of the thermoplastic hydrophobic polymer particles, however the temperature should be sufficiently below the decomposition temperature of the polymer particles. Preferably the coagulation temperature is at least 10° C. below the temperature at which the decomposition of the polymer particles occurs. The coagulation temperature is preferably higher than 50° C., more preferably above 100° C.
After exposure, the material can be developed by supplying to the coating an aqueous alkaline solution and/or a gum solution and/or by rinsing it with plain water or an aqueous liquid, whereby the non-image areas of the coating are removed. The developing step may be combined with mechanical rubbing, e.g. by a rotating brush. During the development step, any water-soluble protective layer present is preferably also removed.
Alternatively, the printing plate precursor can, after exposure, be mounted on a printing press and be developed on-press by supplying ink and/or fountain to the precursor.
The gum solution which can be used in the development step, is typically an aqueous liquid which comprises one or more surface protective compounds that are capable of protecting the lithographic image of a printing plate against contamination or damaging. Suitable examples of such compounds are film-forming hydrophilic polymers or surfactants. The gum solution has preferably a pH from 3 to 8, more preferably from 5 to 8. Preferred gum solutions are described in EP 1,342,568.
A preferred aqueous alkaline developer solution is a developer with a pH of at least 10, more preferably at least 11, most preferably at least 12. Preferred developer solutions are buffer solutions such as for example silicate-based developers or developer solutions comprising phosphate buffers. Silicate-based developers which have a ratio of silicon dioxide to alkali metal oxide of at least 1 are advantageous because they ensure that the alumina layer (if present) of the substrate is not damaged. Preferred alkali metal oxides include Na2O and K2O, and mixtures thereof. A particularly preferred silicate-based developer solution is a developer solution comprising sodium or potassium metasilicate, i.e. a silicate where the ratio of silicon dioxide to alkali metal oxide is 1.
In addition to alkali metal silicates, the aqueous alkaline developer may optionally contain further components, such as buffer substances, complexing agents, antifoams, organic solvents in small amounts, corrosion inhibitors, dyes, surfactants and/or hydrotropic agents as known in the art.
The development step with an aqueous alkaline solution is preferably carried out at temperatures of from 20 to 40° C. in automated processing units as customary in the art. For regeneration, alkali metal silicate solutions having alkali metal contents of from 0.6 to 2.0 mol/l can suitably be used. These solutions may have the same silica/alkali metal oxide ratio as the developer (generally, however, it is lower) and likewise optionally contain further additives. The required amounts of regenerated material must be tailored to the developing apparatuses used, daily plate throughputs, image areas, etc. and are in general from 1 to 50 ml per square meter of plate precursor. The addition of replenisher can be regulated, for example, by measuring the conductivity of the developer as described in EP-A 0,556,690.
The development step with an aqueous alkaline solution may be followed by a rinsing step and/or a gumming step. The gumming step involves post-treatment of the lithographic printing plate with a gum solution (as described above).
The plate precursor can, if required, be post-treated with a suitable correcting agent or preservative as known in the art. To increase the resistance of the finished printing plate and hence to extend the run length, the layer can be briefly heated to elevated temperatures (“baking”). The plate can be dried before baking or is dried during the baking process itself. During the baking step, the plate can be heated at a temperature which is higher than the glass transition temperature of the thermoplastic particles, e.g. between 100° C. and 230° C. for a period of 40 minutes to 5 minutes. A preferred baking temperature is above 60° C. For example, the exposed and developed plates can be baked at a temperature of 230° C. for 5 minutes, at a temperature of 150° C. for 10 minutes or at a temperature of 120° C. for 30 minutes. Baking can be done in conventional hot air ovens or by irradiation with lamps emitting in the infrared or ultraviolet spectrum. As a result of this baking step, the resistance of the printing plate to plate cleaners, correction agents and UV-curable printing inks increases. Such a thermal post-treatment is described, inter alia, in DE 1,447,963 and GB 1,154,749.
The printing plate thus obtained can be used for conventional, so-called wet offset printing, in which ink and an aqueous dampening liquid are supplied to the plate. Another suitable printing method uses so-called single-fluid ink without a dampening liquid. Suitable single-fluid inks have been described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,045,232; U.S. Pat. No. 4,981,517 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,392. In a most preferred embodiment, the single-fluid ink comprises an ink phase, also called the hydrophobic or oleophilic phase, and a polyol phase as described in WO 00/32705.
Preparation of the Lithographic Substrate.
A 0.30 mm thick aluminum foil was degreased by immersing the foil in an aqueous solution containing 40 g/l of sodium hydroxide at 60° C. for 8 seconds and rinsed with demineralized water for 2 seconds. The foil was then electrochemically grained during 15 seconds using an alternating current in an aqueous solution containing 12 g/l of hydrochloric acid and 38 g/l of aluminum sulfate (18-hydrate) at a temperature of 33° C. and a current density of 130 A/dm2. After rinsing with demineralized water for 2 seconds, the aluminum foil was then desmutted by etching with an aqueous solution containing 155 g/l of sulfuric acid at 70° C. for 4 seconds and rinsed with demineralized water at 25° C. for 2 seconds. The foil was subsequently subjected to anodic oxidation during 13 seconds in an aqueous solution containing 155 g/l of sulfuric acid at a temperature of 45° C. and a current density of 22 A/dm2, then washed with demineralized water for 2 seconds and post-treated for 10 seconds with a solution containing 4 g/l of polyvinylphosphonic acid at 40° C., rinsed with demineralized water at 20° C. during 2 seconds and dried.
The support thus obtained has a surface roughness Ra of 0.21 μm and an anodic weight of 4 g/m2 of Al2O3.
Preparation of the Printing Plate Precursors 1-7.
Preparation of Comparative Printing Plate Precursor 1.
Comparative printing plate precursor 1 was produced by first applying a coating solution onto the above described lithographic substrate. The composition of the coating is defined in Table 1. The coating was applied from an aqueous coating solution and dried at 60° C.; a dry coating weight of 0.8 g/m2 was obtained.
Preparation of Invention Printing Plate Precursors 2 to 7.
Printing plate precursors 2 to 7 were prepared by applying the coating solution of Table 1 to which a polymer comprising siloxane monomeric units was added to improve the sensitivity to suction cups as used in automatic plate handling (Table 2).
Determination of the Sensitivity to Suction Cups of the Printing Plate Precursors 1-7.
A simulation test as described in detail below was performed to assess the sensitivity to suction cups as used in automatic plate handling.
Procedure of the Simulation Test.
A series of suction cups are contacted to the plate under a reduced pressure of 85 kPa. The contact time is varied: four cups are contacted for respectively 30, 60, 180 and 300 seconds. After processing and printing (printing conditions see below) the damage for all pressures on plate and/or print is integrated and compared to the reference precursor.
Exposure Step.
After the above test, the plate precursors 1-7 were exposed with a Creo Trendsetter 2344T (40W) (plate-setter, trademark from Creo, Burnaby, Canada), operating at 150 rpm and a varying density up to 210 mJ/cm2.
Processing and Gumming Step.
After exposure, the plate precursors were processed in an Agfa VA88 processor (trademark from Agfa-Gevaert), operating at a speed of 1.1 m/min and at 22° C., using Agfa PD91 (see below) as developer solution (trademark from Agfa-Gevaert).
Agfa PD91 is a buffer solution comprising potassium metasilicate, Genapol C200 (surfactant commercially available from Clariant GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) and Librateric AA30 (surfactant commercially available from Libra Chemicals Limited, Manchester UK) and has a pH=13.
After development, the plates are gummed with RC795 (trademark from Agfa-Gevaert).
Printing Step.
The plates were mounted on a GTO46 printing press (available from Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG), and a print job was started using K+E Novavit 800 Skinnex ink (trademark of BASF Drucksysteme GmbH) and 3% FS101 (trademark of Agfa-Gevaert) in 10% isopropanol as a fountain liquid.
Print Results.
The results of the simulation test to assess the sensitivity to suction cups were determined and are summarized in Table 3.
The results in Table 3 demonstrate that the sensitivity to suction cups as used in automatic plate handling on print is improved by adding a copolymer comprising siloxane units. A concentration of 7 mg/m2 is sufficient while an amount of 21 mg/m2 is even better.
The sensitivity to finger prints upon manual handling was also assessed and the printing plates comprising the copolymer comprising siloxane units showed a decreased sensitivity to finger prints upon manual handling. A concentration of 7 mg/m2is sufficient while a level of 21 mg/m2 is preferred.
Preparation of the Lithographic Substrate.
The preparation of the lithographic substrate was done as described in Example 1.
Preparation of the Printing Plate Precursors 8-11.
Preparation of Comparative Printing Plate Precursor 8.
Comparative printing plate precursor 8 was produced by first applying a coating solution onto the above described lithographic substrate. The composition of the coating is defined in Table 4. The coating was applied from an aqueous coating solution and dried for 1 minute at 50° C.; a dry coating weight of 0.69 g/m2 was obtained.
Preparation of Invention Printing Plate Precursors 9 to 11.
Printing plate precursors 9 to 11 were prepared by applying the coating solution of Table 4 to which one or more additional ingredients were added as indicated in the Table 5 below (Table 5).
Determination of the Sensitivity to Suction Cups of the Printing Plate Precursors 8-11.
The simulation test as described in detail in Example 1 was performed to assess the sensitivity to suction cups as used during automatic plate handling.
Exposure Step.
The plate precursors 8-11 were exposed with a Creo Trendsetter 2344T (40W) (plate-setter, trademark from Creo, Burnaby, Canada), operating at a varying density up to 210 mJ/cm2.
Processing and Gumming Step.
After exposure, the plate precursors were processed in an Agfa VA88 processor (trademark from Agfa), operating at a speed of 1.1 m/min and at 22° C., using Agfa PD91 (see below) as developer solution (trademark from Agfa).
Agfa PD91 is a buffer solution comprising potassium metasilicate, Genapol C200 (surfactant commercially available from Clariant GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) and Librateric AA30 (surfactant commercially available from Libra Chemicals Limited, Manchester UK) and has a pH=13.
After development, the plates are gummed with RC795 (trademark from Agfa).
Printing Step.
The plates were mounted on a GTO52 printing press (available from Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG), and a print job was started using K+E Novavit 800 Skinnex ink (trademark of BASF Drucksysteme GmbH) and 3% FS101 (trademark of Agfa) in 10% isopropanol as a fountain liquid.
Print Results.
The results of the simulation test to assess the sensitivity to suction cups as used during automatic plate handling were determined and are summarized in Table 6.
The results in Table 6 demonstrate that the invention printing plates 10 and 11 which comprise polysiloxanes, are less sensitive to suction cups as used in automatic plate handling on plate/print compared to the comparative printing plates 8 and 9. The result of printing plate 11 which further comprises a spacer particle, is even better.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05105378.3 | Jun 2005 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP05/56194 | 11/24/2005 | WO | 00 | 12/17/2007 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60694228 | Jun 2005 | US |
