The present invention is related to a method for manufacturing a stent and a stent manufactured thereby.
Drug-eluting implantable medical devices have become popular in recent times for their ability to perform their primary function (such as structural support of a vessel, for example) and their ability to medically treat the area in which they are implanted.
For example, drug-eluting stents have been used to act as scaffolds to support lumens of vessels in open positions and to prevent restenosis in coronary arteries. Drug-eluting stents may administer therapeutic agents such as anti-inflammatory compounds that block local invasion/activation of monocytes, thus preventing the secretion of growth factors that may trigger vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. Other potentially anti-restenotic compounds, including antiproliferative agents, may also be administered. Other classes of drugs such as anti-thrombotics, anti-oxidants, platelet aggregation inhibitors and cytostatic agents have also been suggested for anti-restenotic use.
Drug-eluting stents may be coated with a polymeric material which, in turn, is impregnated with a drug or a combination of drugs. Once the stent is implanted at a target location, the drug is released from the polymer for treatment of the local tissues. The drug is released by a process of diffusion through the polymer layer for biostable polymers, and/or as the polymer material degrades for biodegradable polymers.
Controlling the rate of elution of a drug from the drug impregnated polymeric material is generally based on the properties of the polymer material. However, at the conclusion of the elution process, the remaining polymer material in some instances has been linked to an adverse reaction with the vessel, possibly causing a small but dangerous clot to form. Further, drug impregnated polymer coatings on exposed surfaces of medical devices may flake off or otherwise be damaged during delivery, thereby preventing the drug from reaching the target site. Still further, drug impregnated polymer coatings are limited in the quantity of the drug to be delivered by the amount of a drug that the polymer coating can carry and the size of the medical devices. Controlling the rate of elution using polymer coatings is also difficult.
Stents can be manufactured from a variety of materials. These materials include, but are not limited to, metals and polymers. Both metal and polymer vascular stents have been associated with thrombosis, chronic inflammation at the implantation site, and impaired remodeling at the stent site. It has been proposed that limiting the exposure of the vessel to the stent to the immediate intervention period would reduce late thrombosis chronic inflammation and allow the vessel to return to its normal functional state. One means to produce a temporary stent is to implant a bioabsorbable or biodegradable stent.
There are several parameters to consider in the selection of a bioabsorbable material for stent manufacture. These include, but are not limited to, the strength of the material to avoid potential immediate recoil of the vessel, the rate of degradation and corrosion, and biocompatibility with the vessel wall. Additionally, it may be desirable to include therapeutic agents in the bioabsorbable stent such that the therapeutic agent is released at the implantation site during degradation of the stent. The mechanical properties of the stent and release profiles of therapeutic agents directly depend on the rate of degradation of the stent material which is controlled by selection of the stent materials, passivation agents and the manufacturing process of the stent. Currently there are two types of materials, i.e. polymers and metals, used in bioabsorbable stents.
Bioabsorbable polymer stent materials have several significant limitations. Their radial strength is lower than metallic materials, which can result in early recoil post implantation and other mechanical tradeoffs. Also, bioabsorbable polymer stent materials are associated with a significant degree of local inflammation, and they have a relatively slow bioabsorption rate. Additionally, polymeric stents are often radiolucent which impairs accurate positioning within a vessel lumen. The physical limitations of the polymer require thick struts to increase radial strength which impedes their profile and delivery capabilities. Non-biodegradable markers are also needed to provide radiopacity. Metal bioabsorbable stents are attractive since they have the potential to perform similarly to durable metal stents.
There exists a need for a bioabsorbable, drug-eluting stent that incorporates the strength characteristics of a metal with nonpolymer drug eluting properties.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for manufacturing a stent. The method includes forming a stent blank from a first material. The stent blank includes a plurality of struts and a plurality of crowns, each crown connecting at least two struts, and a plurality of slots in at least some of the plurality of struts and/or the plurality of crowns. The method includes depositing a second material over outer surfaces of the struts and the crowns and in the slots to encase the stent blank in the second material, creating an opening through the second material, and removing the first material to form a stent comprising the second material, the stent having a continuous lumen from one end of the stent to the other end of the stent, the continuous lumen being partitioned in portions corresponding to the locations of the slots in the stent blank.
In an embodiment, forming the stent blank includes laser cutting a cylindrical substrate that includes the first material to create a pattern comprising the struts and the crowns. In an embodiment, forming the stent blank includes etching a cylindrical substrate that includes the first material to create a pattern comprising the struts and the crowns.
In an embodiment, forming the stent blank further includes laser cutting the plurality of slots. In an embodiment, forming the stent blank further includes etching the plurality of slots.
In an embodiment, the method further includes cleaning the stent blank prior to depositing the second material.
In an embodiment, the depositing includes electron deposition of the second material onto the outer surfaces of the struts and the crowns and in the slots. In an embodiment, the depositing includes electrochemical deposition of the second material onto the outer surfaces of the struts and the crowns and in the slots. In an embodiment, the depositing includes sputter coating the second material onto the outer surfaces of the struts and the crowns and in the slots.
In an embodiment, the depositing includes depositing the second material over the outer surfaces of the struts and the crowns and in the slots to create a coating having a thickness of 10-30 μm. In an embodiment, the depositing includes depositing the second material over the outer surfaces of the struts and the crowns to create a coating having a thickness of at least one-half the width of the slots.
In an embodiment, the first material includes tantalum. In an embodiment, the second material includes iron.
In an embodiment, the method includes depositing a third material over at least the outer surfaces of the struts and the crowns, the third material being radiopaque. In an embodiment, the third material comprises platinum.
In an embodiment, the method includes filling the lumen with a therapeutic substance.
According to an aspect of the invention, a stent is manufactured by a method that includes forming a stent blank from a first material. The stent blank includes a plurality of struts and a plurality of crowns, each crown connecting at least two struts, and a plurality of slots in at least some of the plurality of struts and/or the plurality of crowns. The method includes depositing a second material over outer surfaces of the struts and the crowns and in the slots to encase the stent blank in the second material, creating an opening through the second material; and removing the first material to form a stent comprising the second material and having a continuous lumen from one end of the stent to the other end of the stent.
According to an aspect of the invention, a stent is manufactured by a method that includes forming a stent blank from a first material. The stent blank includes a plurality of struts and a plurality of crowns, each crown connecting at least two struts, and a plurality of slots in at least some of the plurality of struts and/or the plurality of crowns. The method includes depositing a second material over outer surfaces of the struts and the crowns and in the slots to encase the stent blank in the second material, creating an opening through the second material, removing the first material to form a stent comprising the second material and having a continuous lumen from one end of the stent to the other end of the stent, and filling the lumen with a therapeutic substance.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention be apparent from the following description of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention. The drawings are not to scale.
Specific embodiments of the present invention are now described with reference to the figures, where like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
As discussed in further detail below, the stent 10 includes a substance, such as a therapeutic substance or agent, disposed within a pair of parallel lumens, and a plurality of openings 18 in at least some of the plurality of struts 12 and/or plurality of crowns 14. More or less openings 18 may be provided. In an embodiment, the openings 18 may also be provided in at least some of the connectors 16. The illustrated embodiment is not intended to be limiting in any way.
Methods for manufacturing the stent 10 according to embodiments of the present inventions will now be described. In an embodiment, a stent blank 100, such as the stent blank 100 illustrated in
In another embodiment, a cylindrical wire may be shaped into a sinusoidal waveform and wrapped around a cylindrical mandrel to form the stent blank. The wire may then be flattened against the mandrel by techniques, such as swaging. In an embodiment, the wire may have a different cross-section, such as rectangular or square. Connectors between selected crowns from adjacent wraps may be created by fusion or welding techniques.
As part of the same process, or subsequent to the process of forming the desired pattern of struts, crowns, and connectors. A plurality of slots 118 may also be formed in at least some of the struts 112 and/or crowns 114 and/or connectors 116, as illustrated in
In another embodiment, the desired pattern of struts 112, crowns 114, and connectors 116, may be created from the cylindrical substrate 110 by etching. At the same time, the slots 118 may also be created by etching or micro-etching the cylindrical substrate 110. In an embodiment, the slots 118 may be formed at a later time and be etched or micro-etched, or may be cut out of the desired struts 112, crowns 114, and/or connectors 116 by a laser.
In another embodiment, the stent blank 100 and its desired pattern of struts 112, crowns 114, connectors 116, and slots 118 may be formed by three-dimensional (“3-D”) printing techniques.
After the stent blank 100 having the desired pattern of struts 112, crowns 114, connectors 116, and slots 118 has been formed, as illustrated in
After the stent blank 100 has been cleaned, a second material 121 may then be deposited over the outer surfaces of the stent blank 100 and into the slots 118 so as to encase, i.e. completely surround and envelope, the stent blank 100. The second material 121 may be a material known to be bioabsorbable, such as iron, magnesium, zinc, alloys of iron, alloys of magnesium, and alloys of zinc. In an embodiment, a third material may be mixed or alloyed with the second material 121 or may be deposited onto at least some of the outer surfaces of the stent blank 100 or in the slots 118 prior to the deposition of the second material 121. For example, in an embodiment, the third material may be radiopaque and may comprise, for example, platinum.
Various methods may be used to deposit the second material 121 over the first material 111 of the stent blank 100. For example, in an embodiment, electron deposition may be used to deposit the second material 121 over the outer surfaces and into the slots 118 of the stent blank 100. In an embodiment, the second material 121 may be sputter coated over the outer surfaces and into the slots 118 of the stent blank 100. Other coating techniques, such as electrodeposition, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), or plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) may be used to coat the second material 121 onto surfaces of the first material 111. In an embodiment, the second material 121 may be deposited so that it forms a coating having a thickness of 10-30 μm over the stent blank 100. In an embodiment, the thickness may be about 25 μm. In an embodiment, the second material 121 may be deposited over the outer surfaces of the stent blank 100 to create a coating having a thickness of at least one-half the width of the slots 118. In an embodiment, the second material 121 may be deposited over the outer surfaces of the stent blank 100 to create a coating having a thickness of equal to or less than one-half the width of the slots 118.
Openings 120 may be created through the second material 121 so as to expose the first material 111, as illustrated in
Various materials may be used for the first material 111, and various materials may be used for the second material 121. The materials and etchants are selected such that the etchants dissolve or otherwise remove the first material 111 without damaging the second material 121. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/500,359, filed Jul. 9, 2009, and published as U.S. 2011/0008405 on Jan. 13, 2011, incorporated herein in its entirety by reference, discloses various etchants that remove one metal or alloy without damaging another metal or alloy.
Upon removal of the first material 111, the second material 121 remains as the struts 12, crowns 14, and connectors 16 of the stent 10, and the stent 10 has a continuous lumen 122 from one end of the stent 10 to the other end of the stent 10, as illustrated, for example, in
If the stent 10 is a drug-eluting stent, the continuous lumen 122 may then be filled with an adjunctive or therapeutic substance 126, as illustrated in
It would be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the openings 120 may be located at various locations along the struts 12 and crowns 14. The size, shape, and/or density (number per unit length or area) of the openings 120 may be varied along the stent 10. Such variations may alter the elution rate of the adjunctive or therapeutic substance along the stent 10. For example, and not by way of limitation, more or larger openings may be providing in the middle portion of the stent 10 and less or smaller openings may be provided near the ends of the stent 10.
To determine the beneficial effect of having a partitioned lumen within a strut, crown, or connector, finite element analysis (FEA) was completed for various cross-sections of a strut made from iron (Fe). Based on literature, the mechanical properties of iron were estimated to be 211 GPa for the Young's Modulus, 300 MPa for the Yield Stress, 135 MPa for the Plastic Modulus, and 0.29 for Poisson's Ratio. Four single strut models were completed using FEA software, and the characteristics of the struts and the predicted strength results, are listed in Table I:
The modeling results indicate that with a constant material and contour geometry, i.e. constant segment length and deployment angles, the strength of the strut may be increased by increasing the thickness/volume of the strut. In addition, the strength of the strut may be increased by hollowing out the strut, i.e. providing a lumen or lumens in the strut, and increasing the volume of the strut. The Model 1 strut, which is solid in cross-section, but thinner than the struts of Models 3 and 4, is predicted to have a strength of 42 mN, while the Model 3 strut, which contains a single lumen, but is thicker than the struts of Models 1 and 2, is predicted to have a strength of 53 mN. Further increasing the strength of the strut cannot be done by making the lumen larger, without lowering the surface area or increasing the volume of the strut. The Model 4 strut, which includes a partitioned lumen, has the same mass as, but greater surface area than, the Model 1 solid strut, and a greater mass and surface area than the Model 3 strut, and is predicted to have a strength of 63 mN, which is higher than the predicted strength of the other Models.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a stent having an enhanced internal three-dimensional geometry that includes a continuous lumen from one end of the stent to the other end of the stent, and portions of the stent in which the lumen is partitioned with strengthening members in the partitioned portion of the lumen. It may be desirable to locate a partitioned lumen with a strengthening member in at least 30% of a curved section, i.e. crown, and/or areas of potential or anticipated high strain, and/or transition areas between straight and curved sections, i.e. between struts and crowns, or multi-curved sections. Although the illustrated embodiment depicts a strengthening member that resembles an I-beam, other shapes may be created by controlling the shape of the stent blank, including the slots.
The enhanced three-dimensional geometry may further increase the strength of the stent, without increasing the total volume of the stent material. For bioabsorbable stents, it is desirable to optimize the ratio of the surface area to volume to minimize the overall degradation time. For example, although iron is known to have good strength and mechanical properties, iron has a relatively slow degradation rate. By forming the stent in accordance to embodiments of the present invention, an improved bioabsorbable, drug-eluting stent with good mechanical properties and short degradation times may be provided.
The stent 10 may be used conventionally in blood vessels of the body to support such a vessel after an angioplasty procedure. It is known that certain drugs eluted from stents may prevent restenosis or other complications associated with angioplasty or stents. The stent 10 may alternatively be used in other organs or tissues of the body for delivery of drugs to treat tumors, inflammation, erectile dysfunction, nervous conditions, or other conditions that would be apparent to those skilled in the art.
The therapeutic substance or drug 126 may include, but is not limited to, antineoplastic, antimitotic, antiinflammatory, antiplatelet, anticoagulant, antifibrin, antithrombin, antiproliferative, antibiotic, antioxidant, and antiallergic substances as well as combinations thereof. Examples of such antineoplastics and/or antimitotics include paclitaxel (e.g., TAXOL® by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.), docetaxel (e.g., TAXOTERE® from Aventis S. A., Frankfurt, Germany), methotrexate, azathioprine, vincristine, vinblastine, fluorouracil, doxorubicin hydrochloride (e.g., ADRIAMYCIN® from Pharmacia & Upjohn, Peapack N.J.), and mitomycin (e.g., MUTAMYCIN® from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.). Examples of such antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antifibrin, and antithrombins include sodium heparin, low molecular weight heparins, heparinoids, hirudin, argatroban, forskolin, vapiprost, prostacyclin and prostacyclin analogues, dextran, D-phe-pro-arg-chloromethylketone (synthetic antithrombin), dipyridamole, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet membrane receptor antagonist antibody, recombinant hirudin, and thrombin inhibitors such as ANGIOMAX™ (Biogen, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.). Examples of such cytostatic or antiproliferative agents include ABT-578 (a synthetic analog of rapamycin), rapamycin (sirolimus), zotarolimus, everolimus, angiopeptin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors such as captopril (e.g., CAPOTEN® and CAPOZIDE® from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.), cilazapril or lisinopril (e.g., PRINIVIL® and PRINZIDE® from Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J.), calcium channel blockers (such as nifedipine), colchicine, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) antagonists, fish oil (omega 3-fatty acid), histamine antagonists, lovastatin (an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, a cholesterol lowering drug, brand name MEVACOR® from Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J.), monoclonal antibodies (such as those specific for Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) receptors), nitroprusside, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, prostaglandin inhibitors, suramin, serotonin blockers, steroids, thioprotease inhibitors, triazolopyrimidine (a PDGF antagonist), and nitric oxide. An example of an antiallergic agent is permirolast potassium. Other therapeutic substances or agents that may be used include nitric oxide, alpha-interferon, genetically engineered epithelial cells, and dexamethasone. In other examples, the therapeutic substance is a radioactive isotope for implantable device usage in radiotherapeutic procedures. Examples of radioactive isotopes include, but are not limited to phosphorus (P32), palladium (Pd103), cesium (Cs131), Iridium (Ir192) and iodine (I125). The substances or agents are provided by way of example and are not meant to be limiting. Other therapeutic substances are equally applicable for use with the disclosed methods and compositions.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of illustration and example only, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the appended claims and their equivalents. It will also be understood that each feature of each embodiment discussed herein, and of each reference cited herein, can be used in combination with the features of any other embodiment. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, brief summary or the detailed description. All patents and publications discussed herein are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
This application claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/781,717, filed Mar. 14, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2153936 | Owens et al. | Apr 1939 | A |
4531933 | Norton et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4643716 | Drach | Feb 1987 | A |
4720384 | DiLuccio et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4763647 | Gambale | Aug 1988 | A |
4800082 | Karbowski et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4813925 | Anderson, Jr. et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4886062 | Wiktor | Dec 1989 | A |
4913683 | Gregory | Apr 1990 | A |
5019090 | Pinchuk | May 1991 | A |
5063935 | Gambale | Nov 1991 | A |
5133732 | Wiktor | Jul 1992 | A |
5154705 | Fleischhacker et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5234456 | Silvestrini | Aug 1993 | A |
5306250 | March et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5345945 | Hodgson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5536274 | Neuss | Jul 1996 | A |
5538735 | Ahn | Jul 1996 | A |
5569197 | Helmus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5605162 | Mirzaee et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5630840 | Mayer | May 1997 | A |
5670161 | Healy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5772864 | Møller et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782903 | Wiktor | Jul 1998 | A |
5795318 | Wang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5824045 | Alt | Oct 1998 | A |
5843117 | Alt et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5882335 | Leone et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891108 | Leone et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902266 | Leone et al. | May 1999 | A |
5957903 | Mirzaee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6022369 | Jacobsen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6063101 | Jacobsen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071305 | Brown et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099561 | Alt | Aug 2000 | A |
6136023 | Boyle | Oct 2000 | A |
6248190 | Stinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6358276 | Edwin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6478778 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497709 | Heath | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6558422 | Baker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6623519 | Edwin et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6641607 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656162 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699281 | Vallana et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6752829 | Kocur et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6783543 | Jang | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6938668 | Whicher et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6989071 | Kocur et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7037330 | Rivelli et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7041130 | Santini, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7044965 | Spielberg | May 2006 | B1 |
7060093 | Dang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7101392 | Heath | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7122048 | Dimatteo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135039 | De Scheerder et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7182735 | Shireman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7288084 | Li | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7316565 | Liao | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7344563 | Vallana et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7384660 | Hossainy et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7400931 | Mandrusov et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419681 | Tormala et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7455667 | Uhland et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7575593 | Rea et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7736687 | Sims et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020038145 | Jang | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065548 | Birdsall et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087209 | Edwin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103527 | Kocur et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138048 | Tuch | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030021825 | Pathak et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030068353 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030125803 | Vallana et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030208256 | DiMatteo et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006382 | Sohier | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024449 | Boyle | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037889 | Richeal et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040106984 | Stinson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133270 | Grandt | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148012 | Jang | Jul 2004 | A9 |
20050043783 | Amis et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060020 | Jenson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070996 | Dinh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080481 | Madda et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050131521 | Marton | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145307 | Shireman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177226 | Banik et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186241 | Boyle et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050208100 | Weber et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050272806 | Falotico et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278016 | Welsh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004437 | Jayaraman | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064157 | Shanley | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060122689 | Kocur et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129231 | De Scheerder et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147489 | Shanley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155369 | Edwin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060212109 | Sirhan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224234 | Jayaraman | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224237 | Furst et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070005124 | De Scheerder et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027531 | Dimatteo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043423 | Grewe | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055352 | Naimark et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061007 | Nolting | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070112417 | Shanley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123805 | Shireman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070168021 | Holmes, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173923 | Savage et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070219628 | Shanley et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070282419 | Hilaire et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080003251 | Zhou | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051882 | Rubin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065201 | Li | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077233 | Diaz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080183281 | Rea et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188925 | Zhao | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195170 | Asgari | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195196 | Asgari | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234809 | Greenan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249599 | Allen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255659 | Huang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276935 | Wang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306579 | Dolan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024209 | Ozdil et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024210 | Klocke et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090035351 | Berglund et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090061071 | McMorrow et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093871 | Rea et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132031 | Cook et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143855 | Weber et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157172 | Kokate et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163995 | Shanley et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192593 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090220612 | Perera | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228095 | Shanley et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090281615 | Kocur et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312833 | Tittelbach et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319026 | Meyer | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010621 | Klocke | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023115 | Robaina et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036482 | Svrluga et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057196 | Pathak | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070022 | Kuehling | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082096 | Gregorich | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145437 | Girton et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110008405 | Birdsall et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110264187 | Melder | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120009325 | Storment | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120067008 | Bienvenu | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120070562 | Avelar et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120216916 | Pacetti | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130284310 | Peterson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130284311 | Peterson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
836839 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1600534 | Nov 2005 | EP |
836839 | Jul 2006 | EP |
WO9418956 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO9619255 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO9626682 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO9823228 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO0001322 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0155473 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO02060506 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO03092547 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004091686 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2007021749 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007033282 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2011008896 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO2012036929 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 09/716,146, filed Nov. 17, 2000, Boyle. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/428,581, filed Apr. 23, 2009, Hoff et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/500,359, filed Jul. 9, 2009, Storment et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/244,049, filed Sep. 20, 2009, Thompson et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/244,050, filed Sep. 20, 2009, Silver et al. |
Basarir et al., “Osseointegration in Arthroplasty: Can Simvastatin Promote Bone Response to Implants?” International Orthopaedics (SICOT)(2009) 33:855-859. |
Polacco et al. “Biodegradable Hollow Fibres Containing Drug-Loaded Nanoparticles as Controlled Release Systems” Polym International 51:1464-1472 (2002). |
Derle et al., “Particle Engineering Techniques to Enhance Dissolution of Poorly Water Soluble Drugs” International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 2, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 10-15. |
Purvis et al., “Cryogenic Liquids, Nanoparticles, and Microencapsulation” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2006. |
“Breakthrough Solubilization Technology Targets Stubborn Drug Candidates” Dowpharma. |
“Supercritical Carbon-Dioxide Cleaning Defined” Supercritical Carbon-Dioxide Cleaning Technology Review, Jul. 1996. |
Berger “Coating Drug-Eluting Arterial Stents Using Ultrasonic Spray Nozzle” ILASS Americas, 19th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, May 2006. |
Kim et al. “Electrically Controlled Hydrophobicity in a Surface Modified Nanoporous Carbon” Applied Physics Letters 98, 053106 (2011). |
Vallet et al. “Electrowetting of Water and Aqueous Solutions on Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Insulating Films” Polymer vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 2465-2470, 1996. |
PCT Search Report PCT/US2014/026648. |
PCT Search Report PCT/US2010/039087. |
PCT Search Report PCT/US2010/049439. |
PCT Search Report PCT/US2010/049437. |
PCT Search Report PCT/US2010/049434. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140277382 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61781717 | Mar 2013 | US |