1. Field
This invention relates generally to fabrication processes for interferometric modulator arrays and more specifically to methods for manufacturing an array of interferometric modulators.
2. Description of the Related Art
An interferometric modulator is a class of MEM (micro-electromechanical) systems devices which have been described and documented in a variety of patents including U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,835,255, 5,986,796, 6,040,937, 6,055,090, 6,574,033 (application Ser. No. 10/084,893), 6,680,792 (application Ser. No. 09/974,544), 6,867,896 (application Ser. No. 09/966,843), and 7,067,846 (application Ser. No. 10/878,282), and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0072070 (application Ser. No. 10/082,397), herein incorporated by reference. One of the key attributes of these devices is the fact that they are fabricated monolithically using semiconductor-like fabrication processes. Specifically, these devices are manufactured in a sequence of steps which combine film deposition, photolithography, and etching using a variety of techniques. Costs in manufacturing processes of this sort are driven in large part by the number of steps in the sequence. Thus, a reduction in the number of masking steps in the overall manufacturing process will help to reduce manufacturing costs.
In the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, numerous specific details are set forth such as examples of specific materials, machines, and methods in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that these specific details need not be employed to practice the present invention. In other instances, well known materials, machines, or methods have not been described in detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,794,119 (application Ser. No. 10/074,562) herein incorporated by reference describes a prototypical fabrication sequence for building interferometric modulators. In general, interferometric modulator fabrication sequences and categories of sequences are notable for their simplicity and cost effectiveness. This is due in large part to the fact that all of the films are deposited using physical vapor deposition (PVD) techniques with sputtering being the preferred and least expensive of the approaches. The materials used are common throughout the liquid crystal display (LCD) industry. This is significant because this industry represents the most cost effective means for manufacturing large area arrays of devices and provides a prime infrastructure for use in building displays and other devices based on interferometric modulators or other MEM devices. This characteristic is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,867,896 herein incorporated by reference. The materials may be etched using low-cost wet etching processes, or higher cost dry etching techniques depending on the demands of the display application and the need for dimensional control. Photolithography may be achieved using low-cost imaging tools or higher cost step and repeat machines, also dependent on the dimensional requirements of the application. The dimensional requirements are primarily dictated by the resolution of the display in display-centric applications.
In Step 3, an insulator 106, an optical film 108, and a conductor 1010 are deposited also using sputtering and are of a thickness and composition which has been described in the aforementioned patents and patent applications. Examples of the insulator, optical film, and conductor include silicon dioxide, chrome, and aluminum respectively. The optical film 108 and the conductor 1010 have been subsequently patterned in Step 4.
For interferometric modulator matrices that are to be multi-color displays, some mechanism must be provided for depositing and patterning sacrificial layers with multiple heights. The height of the sacrificial layer is what determines one of the color modes or states of the interferometric modulator during operation. Typical full color displays require matrices capable of display in at least three colors, Red, Green, and Blue.
Steps 8-12 of the previous sequence represent the sacrificial layer subprocess, i.e. the sequence of steps whereby the sacrificial layer heights are defined and patterned. This is an additive approach.
The sub-process of
In Step 1 of
The opening in the resist 704 is used as a mask to define the support post via 708 when it is etched into the starter stack 702. Step 3 illustrates a lift-off process for establishing the support posts which in this case are deposited using some form of physical vapor deposition (PVD) technique as opposed to being spun on and photopolymerized using topside or backside exposure. Because of the reentrant profile, a distinct break is formed between the post material 710 in the hole 708 and the excess post material 712 on the surface of the photoresist 704. Thus in Step 4, the excess material 712 is removed in a lift-off process which uses a liquid solvent to dissolve the remaining photoresist and remove all post material which resides on top of it.
In another embodiment, the fabrication process is further streamlined by the elimination of the support posts. This is shown in
Referring now to
The fabrication sequences above are meant to illustrate various methods for building interferometric modulator matrices using different mask counts. They are not meant to be limiting in any way in terms of materials used, steps consolidated, or order of steps.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/414,594, filed Apr. 15, 2003 and published as U.S. patent application publication No. 2006/0261852 A1 on Nov. 23, 2006. The disclosure of the foregoing application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4500171 | Penz et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4519676 | te Velde | May 1985 | A |
4566935 | Hornbeck | Jan 1986 | A |
4710732 | Hornbeck | Dec 1987 | A |
4859060 | Kitagiri et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4900395 | Syverson et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4954789 | Sampsell | Sep 1990 | A |
4956619 | Hornbeck | Sep 1990 | A |
5034351 | Sun et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5083857 | Hornbeck | Jan 1992 | A |
5099353 | Hornbeck | Mar 1992 | A |
5124834 | Cusano et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5216537 | Hornbeck | Jun 1993 | A |
5231532 | Magel et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5233456 | Nelson | Aug 1993 | A |
5287215 | Warde et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5293272 | Jannson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5324683 | Fitch et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5345328 | Fritz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5454906 | Baker et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5497262 | Kaeriayama | Mar 1996 | A |
5526172 | Kanack | Jun 1996 | A |
5583688 | Hornbeck | Dec 1996 | A |
5600383 | Hornbeck | Feb 1997 | A |
5606441 | Florence et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5646768 | Kaeiyama | Jul 1997 | A |
5650881 | Hornbeck | Jul 1997 | A |
5673139 | Johnson | Sep 1997 | A |
5726480 | Pister | Mar 1998 | A |
5745281 | Yi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751469 | Arney et al. | May 1998 | A |
5783864 | Dawson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784212 | Hornbeck | Jul 1998 | A |
5808781 | Arney et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822110 | Dabbaj | Oct 1998 | A |
5825528 | Goosen | Oct 1998 | A |
5835255 | Miles | Nov 1998 | A |
5838484 | Goossen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5867302 | Fleming et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5914803 | Hwang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920421 | Choi | Jul 1999 | A |
5967163 | Pan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986796 | Miles | Nov 1999 | A |
5998293 | Dawson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6031653 | Yu | Feb 2000 | A |
6038056 | Florence et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040937 | Miles | Mar 2000 | A |
6100477 | Randall et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6165890 | Kohl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6204080 | Hwang | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215221 | Cabuz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218056 | Pinarbasi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6284560 | Jech et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288472 | Cabuz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297072 | Tilmans et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6358021 | Cabuz | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359673 | Stephenson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377233 | Colgan et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6407851 | Islam et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6447126 | Hornbeck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448622 | Franke et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465355 | Horsley | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6574033 | Chui et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602791 | Ouellet et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6618187 | Pilossof | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632698 | Ives | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635919 | Melendez et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650455 | Miles | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657832 | Williams et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674090 | Chua et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6674562 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6677225 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680792 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6713235 | Ide et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720267 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6747800 | Lin | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6756317 | Sniegowski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6782166 | Grote et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788175 | Prophet et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6794119 | Miles | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806110 | Lester et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812482 | Fleming et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6867896 | Miles | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6953702 | Miller et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6999236 | Lin | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008812 | Carley | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027202 | Hunter et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7041224 | Patel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7049164 | Bruner | May 2006 | B2 |
7110158 | Miles | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123216 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7172915 | Lin et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7250315 | Miles | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20010003487 | Miles | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010040675 | True et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020014579 | Dunfield | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021485 | Pilossof | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027636 | Yamada | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020054422 | Carr et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055253 | Rudhard | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058422 | Jang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071169 | Bowers et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086455 | Franosch et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020110948 | Huang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117728 | Brosnihhan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020146200 | Kudric et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186483 | Hagelin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197761 | Patel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006468 | Ma et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016428 | Kato et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030053078 | Missey et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053233 | Felton | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030072070 | Miles | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030123126 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030202264 | Weber et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202265 | Reboa et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210851 | Fu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231373 | Kowarz et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040027671 | Wu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035821 | Doan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040051929 | Sampsell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053434 | Bruner | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040100680 | Huibers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040124483 | Partridge et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040124495 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040125347 | Patel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136045 | Tran | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150915 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040191937 | Patel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191946 | Patel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040240032 | Miles | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050024557 | Lin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20080130089 | Miles | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 38 072 | Mar 2000 | DE |
0 069 226 | Jan 1983 | EP |
0 035 299 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0 695 959 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0 788 005 | Aug 1997 | EP |
1 209 738 | May 2002 | EP |
1 275 997 | Jan 2003 | EP |
49-004993 | Jan 1974 | JP |
05275401 | Oct 1993 | JP |
07-014985 | Jan 1995 | JP |
9-127439 | May 1997 | JP |
10-148644 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-097799 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2001-085519 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002-287047 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002-062490 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-207182 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-243937 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-328313 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003-001598 | Jan 2003 | JP |
WO 9105284 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9210925 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 0114248 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0163657 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0224570 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02079853 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03014789 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080068699 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10414594 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 11939746 | US |