Method for measuring center of rotation of a nozzle of a pick and place machine using a collimated laser beam

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7746481
  • Patent Number
    7,746,481
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 20, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 29, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
A method of measuring and storing a center of rotation of a nozzle in a pick and place machine is provided. The method includes coupling an artifact to the nozzle. A substantially collimated laser beam is directed at the artifact, which is rotated while the collimated laser beam is energized. Edges of a shadow cast by the rotating artifact are detected and used to calculate error of a coordinate of the center of rotation of the nozzle. A coordinate of the center of rotation of the nozzle is calculated based upon a previous coordinate of the center of rotation and the error. The calculated coordinate of the center of rotation is stored for subsequent measurements.
Description
BACKGROUND

Pick and place machines are generally used to manufacture electronic circuit boards. A blank printed circuit board is usually supplied to the pick and place machine, which then picks individual electronic components from component feeders, and places such components upon the board. The components are held upon the board temporarily by solder paste, or adhesive, until a subsequent step in which the solder paste is melted or the adhesive is fully cured. The individual electronic components must be placed precisely on the circuit board in order to ensure proper electrical contact, thus requiring correct angular orientation and lateral positioning of the component upon the board.


Pick and place machine operation is challenging. In order to drive the cost of the manufactured circuit board down, the machine must operate quickly to maximize the number of components placed per hour. However, as the state-of-the-art of the electronics industry has advanced, the sizes of the components have decreased and the density of interconnections has increased. Accordingly, the acceptable tolerance on component placement has decreased markedly. Actual pick and place machine operation often requires a compromise in speed to achieve an acceptable level of placement accuracy.


One way in which pick and place machine operation is efficiently sped up is in the utilization of a sensor that is able to accurately evaluate both the position and angular orientation of a picked component upon a nozzle or vacuum quill, while the component is in transit to the placement site. Such sensors essentially allow the task of determining the component position and orientation upon the vacuum quill to be performed without any impact on placement machine speed, unlike systems that require separate motion to a fixed alignment sensor. Such sensors are known, and are commercially available from CyberOptics Corporation, of Golden Valley, Minn., under the trade designation Model LNC-60. Several aspects of these sensors are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,278,634; 6,490,048; and 6,583,884.


These laser-based alignment sensors are used in pick and place machines to measure the offset (X, Y and θ) and size (Sx, Sy) of picked components. Laser-based alignment sensors generally transmit the measured offset values to the pick and place machine controller, so that the controller of the machine can correct for the offset and accurately place the component upon the circuit board at the placement site. Additionally, the part size (Sx, Sy) features are also measured and transmitted to the pick and place machine allowing the pick and place machine to detect incorrect part size, or other problems.


Increasing the capability of such a sensor is a significant benefit to the art of electronics assembly. In particular, it is desirable to provide very large measurement area in a compact sensor volume to allow accurate alignment of multiple components in parallel. These sensors rely on precise characterization of the measurement geometry.


SUMMARY

A method of measuring and storing a center of rotation of a nozzle in a pick and place machine is provided. The method includes coupling an artifact to the nozzle. A substantially collimated laser beam is directed at the artifact, which is rotated while the collimated laser beam is energized. Edges of a shadow cast by the rotating artifact are detected and used to calculate error of a coordinate of the center of rotation of the nozzle. A coordinate of the center of rotation of the nozzle is calculated based upon a previous coordinate of the center of rotation and the error. The calculated coordinate of the center of rotation is stored for subsequent measurements.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an elevation view illustrating a diagrammatic alignment sensor with which embodiments of the present invention are particularly useful.



FIG. 2 is a plan view illustrating a diagrammatic laser-based alignment sensor with which embodiments of the present invention are particularly useful.



FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic view illustrating error in diameter measurement of a round artifact in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic view of the intensity of a shadow cast by a round artifact where the left and right shadow edges are indicate by vertical bars.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a method of calculating a Center of Rotation of a nozzle of a pick and place machine in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

Some commercially-available laser-based alignment sensors, such as the LNC 60 laser-based alignment sensor available from CyberOptics, assumes a nominal Center of Rotation (COR) for the component rotation axis. The COR is represented by Cartesian coordinates (XCOR, YCOR) where the rotation axis intersects the sensor's x-y reference plane. When the sensor is attached to the placement head of the pick and place machine, the actual COR is not identical to the nominal COR due to mechanical tolerances of the placement machine. When the sensor is programmed with only the nominal COR, the sensor will measure the part with some error. In order to minimize the error, it is necessary to find the actual COR and for it to be programmed into the sensor prior to the measurement of a part. Additionally, with variations that occur during operation, such as from machine wear, faults, etc., the previously-programmed COR may not continue to be correct.


Embodiments of the present invention generally provide a laser-based alignment sensor with the ability to automatically measure a Center of Rotation and update the value, either within the sensor, or within the controller of the pick and place machine. This automatic measurement can be performed when the sensor is first installed and can be periodically performed during operation.


Commercially available laser-based alignment sensors have the ability to perform measurements in a two-edge or a single-edge mode. In the two-edge mode, a measurement is made using data collected from both left and right shadow edges. In the single-edge mode, only one of the shadow edges, left or right is used to compute a measurement. In the single-edge measurement mode, error (E) between the assumed Center of Rotation (COR) and the true Center of Rotation (COR) adds a bias to the size measurement that is proportional to E. More precisely, the size bias is equal to twice the component of E in the direction normal to the light ray defining the edge of the component. Because the laser beam in at least some commercially available-laser-based alignment sensors is nearly collimated, the right edge and left edge measurements will produce a bias with substantially the same magnitude, but opposite signs. Embodiments of the present invention generally leverage this property to determine true Center of Rotation within a sufficiently small error.



FIGS. 1 and 2 are elevation and plan views illustrating a diagrammatic laser-based alignment sensor with which embodiments of the present invention are particularly useful. One or more vacuum quills or nozzles 24 are used to pick up components, such as component 30, from a feeder, such as a tape feeder, and move the component 30 to a placement location upon a circuit board. While component 30 is undergoing the relative motion to its placement site, sensor 43 is able to determine both the location of component 30 upon vacuum quill 24, as well as the rotational orientation of component 30 upon vacuum quill 24. In the example illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, a source of monochromatic illumination, such as laser diode 60, directs illumination away from part 30. Two reflecting mirrors 70, 72, direct the laser light beam through collimating lens 61, and slit aperture 75, past electronic component 30 with that portion of the laser beam or stripe which passes the edge of component 30 being filtered by optical filter 26 to strike linear CCD array 65, which then provides data to be processed for angular orientation and x, y location. While the illumination is energized, vacuum quill 24, and accordingly, component 30, are rotated and the corresponding movement of shadows upon linear CCD array 65 are used to calculate the angular orientation and x, y location.


In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the true Center of Rotation of nozzle 24 is measured by the sensor. Initially, the sensor is programmed with a nominal position; CORprogrammed=(XCOR, YCOR)=(0, 0). The pick and place machine then picks up a round artifact, the diameter of which is known, and is small enough to allow both the left and right edge measurements to be performed. Two single-edge measurements of this round artifact are performed: a right edge-only measurement, and a left edge-only measurement. The Center of Rotation (COR) error vector, E, is defined by the following equation:

E=CORprogrammed−CORtrue


The component of the error vector (E) normal to the beam ray, Ex, produces the size bias. In order to measure the component size without bias, it is important to eliminate, or minimize, Ex by programming the sensor with the correct value for the x-coordinate for the Center of Rotation. The sensor design has the properties that the beam is nearly collimated and that the beam ray normal angle is within a few degrees of the sensor x-axis. As a consequence, the component of the Center of Rotation in the direction parallel to the beam, Ey, has very little effect on the measurement and can thus be neglected.


In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the algorithms and methods performed by laser-based alignment sensors process the data collected from the round artifact to compute three results: the offset coordinates (X, Y) of the center of the round part with respect to the Center of Rotation and the diameter (D). The Center of Rotation error will introduce a bias in D of +2Ex for the left edge-only measurement and −2Ex for the right edge-only measurement.

Dleft=Dtrue+2Ex;
Dright=Dtrue−2Ex


This relationship is illustrated in FIG. 3. The pick and place machine uses the equation Ex=(Dleft−Dright)/4 to compute Ex. From this, the pick and place machine computes the true value of the x-coordinate of the Center of Rotation:

XCOR,true=XCOR,programmed−Ex.

Since the beam is not perfectly collimated, the bias from the left edge-only and right edge-only measurements are not exactly equal. This results in a small residual error after using the procedure. Accordingly, a preferred embodiment of the present invention is to iterate, thus performing the procedure repeatedly until E is sufficiently small for the application, such as 0.002 millimeters. This would be accomplished within one or two iterations.



FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic view of the intensity of a shadow cast by a 1.0 millimeter round artifact where the left and right shadow edges are indicated by vertical bars.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a method of calculating a Center of Rotation of a nozzle of a pick and place machine in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Method 100 begins at block 102 and continues to block 104 where initial values for the Center of Rotation are arbitrarily set. This is preferably done programmatically by a technician, or other suitable entity, such as a manufacturer, entering zeros for both the X-coordinate Center of Rotation (XCOR) and the Y-coordinate Center of Rotation (YCOR). Method 100 continues at block 106 where the pick and place machine picks up an artifact designed to facilitate Center of Rotation calculation. Preferably this artifact has a circular shape, but any suitable shape can be used. At block 108, the sensor measures the artifact using only the left edge-only measurement and reports the value obtained as Dleft. Next, at block 110, the sensor measures the artifact using a right edge-only measurement, and reports Dright. At block 112, the pick and place machine, or the sensor, computes the error in the x coordinate (Ex) as:

Ex=(Dleft−Dright)/4.

Additionally, the x coordinate of the true Center of Rotation is calculated (XCOR,true)=XCOR,programmed−Ex. Next, at block 114, the Center of Rotation value for the x coordinate is updated from the previous value, such as 0, to the newly calculated value, XCOR,true. At block 116, the absolute value of the error in the x coordinate (|Ex|) is checked to see if it is greater than a threshold (Ex,max) in the x direction. If the absolute value is greater than the threshold, the method iterates by returning from block 116 to block 108. However, if the error is equal to or less than the selected threshold, then method 100 exits via block 118.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, while embodiments of the present invention have generally been described with respect to calculating a center of rotation of a single nozzle, any suitable number of nozzles within the illumination field of the collimated laser can have their centers of rotation calculated, as long as each nozzle is calculated separately from the others. Thus, the round artifact would only be coupled to a single nozzle at a time.

Claims
  • 1. A method of measuring a center of rotation of a nozzle in a pick and place machine, the method comprising: coupling an artifact to the nozzle;directing a substantially collimated laser beam at the artifact;rotating the artifact while the collimated laser beam is energized;detecting edges of a shadow cast by the rotating artifact;calculating error of a coordinate of the center of rotation of the nozzle using the detected edges;calculating a coordinate of the center of rotation of the nozzle based upon a previous coordinate of the center of rotation and the error; andstoring the calculated coordinate of the center of rotation for subsequent measurements.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the artifact is round.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the dimension is the diameter of the artifact.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the calculated coordinate is an x-axis coordinate, normal to a direction of the collimated laser beam.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the method is performed iteratively until the calculated error is below a selected threshold.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the selected threshold is 0.002 millimeters.
  • 7. The method of claim 4, wherein the method is repeated.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the calculated coordinate of the center of rotation is stored in a controller of a pick and place machine.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the calculated coordinate of the center of rotation is stored in an alignment sensor.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the previous coordinate is 0.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed periodically.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed when an alignment sensor is coupled to a placement head of the pick and place machine.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application is based on and claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/919,083, filed Mar. 20, 2007, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (86)
Number Name Date Kind
3337941 Drop et al. Aug 1967 A
3487226 Yetter et al. Dec 1969 A
3622396 Fernandez et al. Nov 1971 A
3624401 Stoller Nov 1971 A
3636635 Lemelson Jan 1972 A
3764813 Clement et al. Oct 1973 A
3781115 Rader et al. Dec 1973 A
3854052 Asar et al. Dec 1974 A
3876877 Wilhelmus et al. Apr 1975 A
3888362 Fletcher et al. Jun 1975 A
3905705 Petrohilos Sep 1975 A
4074938 Taylor Feb 1978 A
4144449 Funk et al. Mar 1979 A
4151945 Ragard et al. May 1979 A
4247767 O'Brien et al. Jan 1981 A
4312109 Kawana Jan 1982 A
4346293 Fetzer Aug 1982 A
4383359 Suzuki et al. May 1983 A
4405233 Grau Sep 1983 A
4424588 Satoh et al. Jan 1984 A
4456378 Goldowsky et al. Jun 1984 A
4553843 Langley et al. Nov 1985 A
4559452 Igaki et al. Dec 1985 A
4585350 Pryor Apr 1986 A
4598456 McConnell Jul 1986 A
4615093 Tews et al. Oct 1986 A
4628464 McConnell Dec 1986 A
4706379 Seno et al. Nov 1987 A
4733969 Case et al. Mar 1988 A
4741621 Taft et al. May 1988 A
4747198 Asai et al. May 1988 A
4776088 Biggs et al. Oct 1988 A
4794689 Seno et al. Jan 1989 A
4805110 Takahashi et al. Feb 1989 A
4812666 Wistrand Mar 1989 A
4881319 Yagi et al. Nov 1989 A
4891772 Case et al. Jan 1990 A
4905370 Hineno et al. Mar 1990 A
4973216 Domm Nov 1990 A
5005978 Skunes et al. Apr 1991 A
5012115 Asai et al. Apr 1991 A
5030839 van de Stadt Jul 1991 A
5035047 Harigane et al. Jul 1991 A
5039210 Welstead et al. Aug 1991 A
5040291 Janisiewicz et al. Aug 1991 A
5046851 Morgan Sep 1991 A
5060366 Asai Oct 1991 A
5088187 Takata et al. Feb 1992 A
5114229 Hideshima May 1992 A
5114230 Pryor May 1992 A
5131139 Oyama et al. Jul 1992 A
5162866 Tomiya et al. Nov 1992 A
5260791 Lubin Nov 1993 A
5278634 Skunes et al. Jan 1994 A
5293048 Skunes et al. Mar 1994 A
5309223 Konicek et al. May 1994 A
5331406 Fishbaine et al. Jul 1994 A
5377405 Sakurai et al. Jan 1995 A
5384956 Sakurai et al. Jan 1995 A
5455870 Sepai et al. Oct 1995 A
5467186 Indo et al. Nov 1995 A
5471310 Spigarelli et al. Nov 1995 A
5493391 Neal et al. Feb 1996 A
5493403 Nishi Feb 1996 A
5559727 Deley et al. Sep 1996 A
5566447 Sakurai Oct 1996 A
5570993 Onodera et al. Nov 1996 A
5608642 Onodera Mar 1997 A
5619328 Sakurai Apr 1997 A
5619528 Rebec et al. Apr 1997 A
5660519 Ohta et al. Aug 1997 A
5739525 Greve Apr 1998 A
5745241 Hashimoto Apr 1998 A
5749142 Hanamura May 1998 A
5897611 Case et al. Apr 1999 A
5900940 Aoshima May 1999 A
5901241 Koljonen et al. May 1999 A
5956149 Suzuki et al. Sep 1999 A
6031242 Hudson Feb 2000 A
6100922 Honda et al. Aug 2000 A
6118538 Haugan et al. Sep 2000 A
6195165 Sayegh Feb 2001 B1
6400459 Haugan et al. Jun 2002 B1
6490048 Rudd et al. Dec 2002 B1
RE38025 Skunes et al. Mar 2003 E
6583884 Rudd et al. Jun 2003 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (39)
Number Date Country
28 34 836 Jun 1979 DE
30 22 803 Apr 1981 DE
062335 Oct 1982 EP
144717 Jun 1985 EP
0293175 May 1988 EP
0374848 Dec 1989 EP
0582086 Jul 1993 EP
0582171 Feb 1994 EP
2183820 Jun 1987 GB
57-017804 Jan 1982 JP
60-183507 Sep 1985 JP
60-189951 Sep 1985 JP
61-225604 Oct 1986 JP
62-008006 Jan 1987 JP
62-263405 Nov 1987 JP
62-288504 Dec 1987 JP
63-202096 Aug 1988 JP
63249018 Oct 1988 JP
63-283100 Nov 1988 JP
63-299400 Dec 1988 JP
2059231 Feb 1990 JP
2062099 Mar 1990 JP
2303751 Dec 1990 JP
3045919 Feb 1991 JP
3115538 May 1991 JP
4322924 Nov 1992 JP
6104596 Apr 1994 JP
6249629 Sep 1994 JP
11040991 Feb 1999 JP
11040992 Feb 1999 JP
11068397 Mar 1999 JP
11068398 Mar 1999 JP
2000 088522 Mar 2000 JP
2000 180141 Jun 2000 JP
2001-230597 Aug 2001 JP
1370456 Jan 1988 SU
WO 9949713 Sep 1999 WO
WO 0174127 Oct 2001 WO
WO 2007033349 Mar 2007 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080231864 A1 Sep 2008 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60919083 Mar 2007 US