Patent Application
20130168575
The invention relates to the field of radioactive radiations detection. More particularly, the invention relates to β− radiation detection on solid surfaces. Pure β− emitters are radionuclides the β− radiation of which is not accompanied by X or γ radiation.
It is important to be able to detect radioactive radiations on a nuclear site, in particular before dismantling thereof, in order to know the risks that the persons present on the site are incurring and to provide them with suitable protection.
Certain radiations are easier to detect than others. For these radiations, such as the γ (gamma) and X types, suitable tools are available today for knowing the intensity of these radiations in a localised manner.
However, other radiations are more difficult to detect since these are too weak, such as those of the β− type. β− radiations are emitted by atom nuclei, comprising neutrons and protons, presenting an excess of neutrons. At constant pressure, a neutron of the nucleus may transform into a proton. This is accompanied by the emission of an electron, which is a β− particle, and an antineutrino. β− radiations are termed moderately penetrating; a sheet of aluminium a few millimetres thick suffices to stop β− radiations, unlike γ and X radiations, which are termed highly penetrating.
In nuclear sites, β− radiations are due mainly to tritium 3H, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen 1H. Before proceeding with the dismantling of the site, it is wished to identify the areas emitting β− radiations, which reveals the presence of tritium 3H that it is necessary to decontaminate.
At the present time, in order to detect β− radiations due to tritium 3H on a solid surface, samplings are carried out, which destroys the solid surface being studied.
For example, in the document “Calculations and measurements of the activation induced in the protective concretes of a high-energy ion accelerator”, in Radioprotection 2000, volume 35, n° 3, pages 311 to 334, the dismantling of the Saturn II synchrotron is described, in operation from 1979 to 1997 at Saclay, France. Prior to the measurement, core sampling is carried out in the concrete of the synchrotron structure, and then the core taken is sampled with diamond. The tritium 3H is then measured on these cores by counting with a liquid scintillator. The sample preparation method is not known from this document.
One drawback of the method used in this article is the need to destroy the solid surface on which it is wished to carry out the measurements of tritium 3H. Another drawback is the very localised measurement of tritium 3H and, if a measurement at another place is required, another core sampling is necessary.
A device and method for measuring tritium 3H in a non-destructive manner are described in the document JP 3-041 386. The device comprises a connection head composed of one end of an aspiration tube, heating elements and fixing suckers for fixing to a solid surface. The aspiration tube is connected to a cold trap, itself connected to an aspiration pump provided with a flow meter.
The method used is as follows: the connection head is placed on the solid surface, in this case concrete. The fixing suckers hold the connection head in place. The heating elements heat the concrete 200° C. on the part covered by the connection head, thus evaporating the water present in the concrete. The pump sucks the water vapour escaping from the concrete. When the water vapour reaches the cold trap, it cools until it condenses into liquid water, which will be used subsequently for measuring the tritium 3H contained in this water.
One drawback of the device and method of this document is that discretising the solid surface is only possible in fractions of the size of the connection head. However, the size of the connection head must be sufficiently large to make it possible to aspirate a sufficient quantity of water in vapour form especially since the concrete does not contain an enormous amount thereof. This technique also assumes that the tritium 3H is labile whereas it may very well be strongly bonded to the concrete.
Another drawback is the need to transport potentially radioactive liquid samples.
Yet another drawback is the difficulty of robotising the placing of the connection head, which has a specific form.
One objective of the invention is to overcome at least one drawback of the prior art described given above by way of examples.
To this aim, the invention provides a kit for detecting β− radiations on a solid surface in a way that is not destructive to the solid surface, comprising at least two films sensitive to at least two distinct type of radiation, including the β− type.
One advantage of this kit is the simplicity of use thereof. In addition, the use of simple films allows robotised placing, which avoids a person entering the enclosure to be dismantled to carry out sampling operations.
Another advantage is the possibility of having a detection in two dimensions of the solid surface.
Other optional and non-limitative features are:
The invention also provides a method of using the kit described above comprising the following steps:
Other optional and non-limitative features of the method are:
Other objectives, features and advantages will emerge from reading the detailed description that follows, with reference to the drawings given by way of illustration and non-limitatively, among which:
a illustrates the steps of the method of using the kit of
b illustrates the steps of the method of using the kit of
a is a reproduction of a first film developed by laser after exposure to the radiations from the solid surface, the film being the one that is closer to the solid surface;
b is a reproduction of a second film developed by laser after exposure to the radiations of the solid surface, the film being the one farther away from the solid surface;
a illustrates the marking on a film due to a sampling scale for quantifying the β− and therefore tritium 3H radiations obtained on a film of the same material as the first film in
b is a reproduction of a developed film that has been placed on top of the film carrying the marking of the sampling scale of
With reference to
The kit K comprises at least two films 1, 2 sensitive to at least two distinct types of radiation, including the β− type.
For example, the two films 1, 2 may be identical and sensitive to β−, γ, X or even also α radiations.
In another example, the two films 1, 2 are different, one is sensitive to β− radiations and the other to γ radiations, or even also X but not to β− radiations.
The number of films in the kit K varies according to the type of radiations that it is wished to detect and/or measure.
The films 1, 2 are advantageously made from polymer covered with a layer of phosphorus. These films typically have a thickness of 1 mm. These films 1, 2, once exposed to the β−, γ, X or α radiations, can easily be reused by exposing them to an intense homogeneous white light but without UV.
The kit K may also comprise a protection 3 for protecting the films 1, 2 from the other radiations surrounding the solid surface S and in particular to the radiation of daylight, which could wipe the films. The protection 3 may be a thin sheet of polymer of approximately 450 μg/cm2, a black fabric or a cover made from a material that is not penetrated by the radiations to which the films 1, 2 are sensitive. In the case where the protection 3 is a cover, this may be made from lead.
The β− radiations are emitted by the nuclei of various atoms, for example tritium 3H and carbon 14 14C. In the case where the concern is solely with tritium 3H, it is necessary to detect only the β− radiations of tritium 3H. The β− radiations emitted by carbon 14 (14C) are more penetrating that the β− radiations emitted by tritium 3H. However, the β− radiations from carbon 14 14C may be separated from the β− radiations from tritium 3H using a separator 4 consisting for example of a sheet of paper between the solid surface S and the first film 1. In this case only carbon 14 14C is seen on the development of the film. The tritium 3H is then observed by the difference between two recordings, one with the separator and the other without the separator.
The kit K may also comprise a sampling scale 5 for quantifying the tritium 3H. The sampling scale 5 makes it possible to quantify the β− radiations and therefore to quantify tritium 3H.
The sampling scale 5 is a series of diverse matrices (for example polymer, concrete, metals, etc.) comprising tritium 3H in different concentrations, for example from 1 kBq/g to around 10 kBq/g, thus forming a set of standards. The sampling scale 5 is to be placed on the solid surface S and under the films 1, 2. The matrices are chosen so as to obtain a good contrast on the film 1 (the size of the matrix in the example in
The sampling scale impresses the films 1, 2 differently according to the exposure time. In the case of quantitative analysis, it is necessary for the films 1, 2 to be exposed for the same period of time on the scale and the materials to be analysed,
With reference to
First of all, a first film 1 is placed E2, E2′ on the solid surface S directly in contact therewith. This first film 1 will be marked by the β−, γ, X and a radiations and stop some of them.
Next, a second film 2 is placed E3, E3′ on the first film 1 directly in contact therewith. Some radiations have been stopped by the first film 1 and therefore the second film 2 will be marked only by the radiations that have passed through the first film 1 and therefore that are penetrating.
Other films can also be placed on each occasion by stacking on the previous stack and in contact therewith. The number of films to be used depends on the β− radiations that it is wished to detect and/or measure. This is because not all β− radiations penetrate in a material in the same way and over the same distance.
β− radiations are not very penetrating; in the majority of cases they are stopped by the first film 1 and therefore mark only the latter. However, in some cases, β− radiations may be more penetrating. It is therefore necessary to use at least one additional film. The most penetrating radiations such as γ or X mark all the films.
It is possible to verify whether the radiations detected on the second film 2 or, if several films are used, the last on the top of the stack, are radiations other than β− by using a suitable electronic detector. If the detector indicates that the radiations that mark the second film 2 or, in the case where several films have been used, the last film on the top of the stack, are γ or X radiations for example, then there is no need to add another film. Otherwise, if the detector indicates that there exists a point on the second film 2 or, where applicable, the last film on the top of the stack, which is not marked by γ or X radiations, for example, then it will be necessary to add an additional film since the mark left is probably due to more penetrating β− radiations.
In order to avoid as much as possible the impression and/or obliteration of the films by stray light coming from the environment around the solid surface S, the two films 1, 2 or the stack of films can be covered E4, E4′ with a protection 3, for example a cover.
The films 1, 2 are left exposed to the radiations from the solid surface S for a given time, for example two weeks in the case of low contamination with tritium 3H. The time is determined experimentally in order to optimise the signal to background ratio and obtain the best contrast on the film.
At the end of the exposure time, the films 1, 2 are collected and exposed by laser by means of suitable apparatus.
When the films 1, 2 are collected and optionally transported, it will be necessary to take care not to leave them exposed to ambient stray light so as to prevent deletion of the data recorded by the films 1, 2.
Where a separator 4 is used,
If a sampling scale 5 in the form of a series of matrices is used (
One advantage of this method is the simplicity of the successive operations to be put in place and which are summarised in the superimposition of films 1, 2 and optionally separator 4, protection 3 and sampling scale 5. Consequently the robotisation of these operations is simplified and the robot to be developed is not of great complexity.
Results Obtained with the Kit
a and 3b reproduce the markings of the first (
In
In
By comparing the two films 1 and 2, it can be noted that the regions G1 to G5 of the first film 1 correspond to the regions Γ1 to Γ5 of the second film 2. These five regions have therefore been marked by γ radiations more penetrating than the β− radiations, which for their part have only marked the regions B1 to B3 of the first film 1. It is the absence of marking of the corresponding regions of the second film 2 that indicates the β− type of these radiations.
The areas of the solid surface corresponding to the areas B1 to B3 have therefore been contaminated by tritium 3H.
This demonstrates that the detection of the β− radiations (and indirectly of the atom nuclei responsible for these radiations) is simplified. In addition, this detection gives information on the tritium 3H contamination in two dimensions.
In order to be able to measure the β− radiations (and consequently tritium 3H) quantitatively, a sampling scale 5 is used as illustrated in
b shows a film placed in contact with the film of
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1057230 | Sep 2010 | FR | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2011/065673 | 9/9/2011 | WO | 00 | 3/7/2013 |
