The present disclosure relates in general to semiconductor fabrication techniques and more particularly to a method for minimizing defects in a semiconductor substrate due to ion implantation.
In conventional semiconductor manufacturing processes, ion implantation into a substrate is typically performed through a thermal oxide layer. During ion implantation, oxygen atoms are likely to be driven into the silicon lattice of the substrate. This phenomenon, known in the industry as oxygen “knock on”, is responsible for current leakage into the substrate that may degrade operation. Thus, knock-on oxide provides a source for crystalline defects. To offset the effects of knock-on oxide, adequate thermal annealing with its inherent diffusion of impurities is typically performed to contain the defects within the dopant profile.
Ion implantation also introduces substrate crystal damage, in which lattice atoms are knocked out of lattice sites, while at the same time a certain number of the newly-introduced atoms will likewise come to rest in positions outside the lattice positions. Such out-of-position phenomena are termed defects. A vacant lattice site is termed a vacancy defect, while an atom located at a non-lattice site is referred to as an interstitial defect. Another defect is the creation of amorphous silicon which must be annealed to return it to its crystalline state. The restorative method generally employed in the art consists of annealing the substrate, where heat is applied to the lattice to mildly energize the atoms, allowing them to work themselves back into the lattice structure and restoring the ion-implanted substrate to its pre-implant condition.
From the foregoing, it may be appreciated by those skilled in the art that a need has arisen to reduce defects introduced into a semiconductor substrate caused by ion implantation that would effect the operation of a device formed therein. In accordance with the present disclosure, there is provided a method for minimizing defects in a semiconductor substrate due to ion implantation that substantially eliminates or greatly reduces problems and limitations associated with conventional semiconductor fabrication processes.
According to the present disclosure, a method for minimizing defects in a semiconductor substrate due to ion implantation is provided that includes providing a semiconductor substrate and forming a thin layer of native oxide on the semiconductor substrate. Ion implantation is performed through the native oxide layer. The native oxide layer reduces the phenomenon of knock-on oxide and oxygen concentration within the semiconductor substrate. Further reduction may be achieved by etching the surface of the semiconductor substrate in order to eliminate a concentration of oxygen at a surface of the semiconductor substrate.
The present disclosure provides various technical advantages over devices made by conventional semiconductor fabrication processes. For example, one technical advantage is in the reduction of the effect of knock-on oxide caused by ion implantation. Another technical advantage is to use a thin layer of native oxide instead of thermal oxide to protect the surface of the substrate for ion implantation. Another technical advantage is to perform a silicon etch after ion implantation to further eliminate oxygen concentration at the surface of the substrate. Damage due to ion implantation is further minimized by performing a low temperature anneal and then a high temperature anneal following ion implantation. Some of these technical advantages are shown and described in the following description. Embodiments described herein may enjoy some, all, or none of these advantages. Other technical advantages may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, description, and claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and the advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts in which:
Process 10 begins in block 12 by manufacturing or providing a semiconductor substrate 100. A mask alignment mark 101 may be formed in substrate 100. During conventional processing steps, a thermal oxide layer is typically formed on the surface of the substrate for protection. Ion implantation is then performed through this thermal oxide layer, resulting in the knock-on oxide phenomenon. For the present application, a native oxide layer 102 is formed on the surface instead of the thermal oxide layer of conventional processes. Native oxide layer 102 is formed on substrate 100 in block 14 by dipping substrate 100 in a chemical wet bath.
The chemical wet bath may include hydrogen peroxide H2O2 or nitric acid HNO3. Solutions with two or more compounds may also be used for the chemical wet bath, such as HCl/H2O2/H2O. An example concentration for the solution may be 1 part HCl, two parts H2O2, and 110 parts H2O. The substrate 100 may be dipped in the chemical wet bath for a period sufficient to grow at least a monolayer of native oxide on substrate 100. The time and temperature parameters to perform such growth may be 5 to 20 minutes at a temperature of 25° C. to 70° C. The time and temperature parameters for the chemical wet bath may be adjusted as desired. Prior to the chemical wet bath, substrate 100 may be subjected to hydrofluoric acid HF cleaning and then rinsed.
The result of the chemical wet bath is the growth of a thin layer 102 of native oxide. This native oxide layer 102 may have a thickness of approximately 1 nm and provides protection to the surface of substrate 100. Native oxide provides better properties than thermal oxide to reduce the effects of knock-on oxide occurring as a result of ion implantation.
After the chemical wet bath dip, process 10 continues at block 16 where ion implantation is performed through native oxide layer 102 to create one or more implant regions 104 in substrate 100. Substrate 100 may be subject to the HF clean and rinse and the chemical wet bath dip prior to the separate formation of each implant region 104.
In order to further reduce the effect of knock-on oxide, process 10 continues at block 18 with an anisotropic silicon etch to remove an amount of the surface of substrate 100. The majority of the oxygen atoms driven into the silicon lattice of the substrate by ion implantation are near the surface of substrate 100. Etching a small portion of the surface of substrate 100 will eliminate those oxygen atoms and improve operation of the end device.
The silicon etching may be performed in a chemical wet bath. The solution used in this chemical wet bath may include tetramethylammonium hydroxide TMAH. An example etching process may include a solution of 5% to 25% by weight TMAH in water at a temperature between 70° C. and 90°. Other parameters and other solutions may be used in the etching process as desired to achieve a similar result. For example, a potassium hydroxide KOH solution or an ammonium hydroxide NH4OH solution may be used instead of TMAH. The silicon etch need only take away about 1 to 5 nm of the surface of substrate 100 as further etching produces insignificant additional benefits in reducing the knock-on phenomenon. An HF clean may be performed prior and/or subsequent to silicon etching to remove any native oxide remaining on the surface of substrate 100.
After silicon etching, process 10 may proceed at block 20 with convention processing steps. These steps may include the formation of an epitaxial layer 106 to establish a channel region for a transistor device and defining the source, drain, and gate regions and contacts of the transistor device. Final annealing and secondary ion mass spectrometry may then performed as desired.
Returning to
Although the present disclosure has been described in detail with reference to a particular embodiment, it should be understood that various other changes, substitutions, and alterations may be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, although the present disclosure includes a description with reference to a specific ordering of processes, other process sequencing may be followed to achieve the end result discussed herein.
Numerous other changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be ascertained by those skilled in the art and it is intended that the present disclosure encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Moreover, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited in any way by any statement in the specification that is not otherwise reflected in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20010019285 | Lin et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010046787 | Kerber et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001890 | Lee | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020142525 | Ohnuma | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050181612 | Brask et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050212038 | Fujiwara | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060011214 | Liu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070224773 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070235757 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080072926 | Munakata | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080305598 | Horsky et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090130816 | Takahashi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090209059 | Isaka et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100107927 | Stewart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100151677 | Braeckelmann et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100203704 | Inumiya et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100252873 | Cheng | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110006349 | Ota et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110201164 | Chung et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110248348 | Gan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Native oxide (web page). |
Fluoric acid (web page). |
MSDS-TMAH (web page). |
“Epitaxy” (Webpage). |
Alan Doolittle, “Ion Implantation” (Web Page). |
Alan Doolittle, “Ion Implantation”, Webpage, No date. |
Wikiepedia, “Epitaxy”, Webpage, No date. |
J. Ruzyllo, “Native Oxide”, Webpage, 2001-2009. |
Chemtrec, “MSDS—TMAH”, webpage, Jul. 16, 2004. |
Wikiepedia, “Hydrofluoric Acid”, Webpage, Jan. 10, 2012. |
PCT Notice of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or the Declaration, PCT/US2011/026589, 11 pages dated Jun. 20, 2011. |
Hori, et al., “Sub-nm screening layer approach for ultra shallow junction formation”, SI Font-End Processing—Physics and Technology of Dopant-Defect Interactions Symposium Mater. Res. Soc. Warrendale, PA, 1999 pp. 15-18. |
Duffy, et al., “Influence of preamorphization and recrystallization on indium doping profiles in silicon”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics Processing and Phenomena American Vacuum Society, New York, NY, vol. 22, No. 3, May 1, 2004 pp. 865-868. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120083132 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |