Method for on-wafer high voltage testing of semiconductor devices

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8988097
  • Patent Number
    8,988,097
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 10, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 24, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A method for wafer high voltage testing of semiconductor devices is disclosed. The method involves adding a patterning layer onto a passivation layer of the semiconductor devices and then etching vias through the passivation layer to expose conductive test points. Testing of the semiconductor devices begins with engaging the conductive test points with high voltage test probes of a testing apparatus and then applying a high voltage test sequence to the conductive test points via the high voltage test probes. The testing of the semiconductor devices concludes by disengaging the high voltage test probes from a last one of the semiconductor devices and then removing the patterning layer from the passivation layer of the semiconductor devices.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates to high voltage testing of semiconductor devices.


BACKGROUND

On-wafer parametric and Known Good Device (KGD) testing for high voltage devices can be challenging. Test voltages in excess of 600 V are typically applied to a wafer with semiconductor devices under test in order to measure leakage and/or breakdown voltage. Often high voltage ionization and breakdown of air or surface flashover will confound electrical measurements of the semiconductor devices' intrinsic device performance. For example, an electric field of around about 30 kV/cm will cause the air between features of a semiconductor device to ionize, which will usually allow a destructive energy flow into the semiconductor device. Fortunately, electric field levels for materials making up semiconductor devices typically exceed 30 kV/cm. Thus, high voltage semiconductor devices are packaged such that an ionization of air to the point of breakdown is prevented. However, before packaging and during wafer testing an air ionization leading to a destructive voltage breakdown is an ever present risk for the semiconductor devices under test. Moreover, even nondestructive voltage breakdowns resulting from air ionization and/or flashover are not indicative of intrinsic device performance.


A common technique for suppressing air ionization and breakdown is to dispense a fluid having a relatively high dielectric strength onto a wafer having semiconductors to be tested. Examples of high dielectric strength fluids include fluorocarbon-based fluids such as perfluorohexane (C6F14). While suppressing air ionization and breakdown using high dielectric strength fluids is effective, it is also impractical for high volume production testing.



FIG. 1 depicts a cross-section of a prior art semiconductor device 10 before undergoing a prior art approach that involves depositing a relatively increased amount of a high dielectric strength material that makes up a passivation layer 12, that at least partially covers conductive features 14 and 16 to suppress air ionization. The semiconductor device 10 has a substrate 18 that carries epitaxial layers 20 onto which the conductive features 14 and 16 are disposed. The passivation layer 12 also covers a section of the epitaxial layers 20 that is between the conductive features 14 and 16.


High electric fields between the conductive features 14 and 16 can sometimes be confined to the passivation layer 12. However, a destructive breakdown may still occur if the layer thickness of the passivation layer 12 is not thick enough. In such a case, a thickening of the passivation layer 12 may be considered as illustrated in FIG. 2. However, there are practical limitations as to how thick the passivation layer 12 can be. For example, inorganic dielectrics like silicon nitride (SiN) are more prone to cracking as a function of increased thickness. A practical thickness for SiN is around about 1 μm, whereas a thickness approaching 5 μm is approaching impracticability. Moreover, if the passivation layer 12 is deposited using a relatively slow process such as atomic layer deposition (ALD), impracticalities of excessive time consumption and excessive cost are introduced for the deposition of material layers greater than 0.1 μm. Thus, a need remains for a high voltage on-wafer testing method for semiconductor devices in a high volume production environment.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure provides a method for on-wafer high voltage testing of semiconductor devices. The method involves adding a patterning layer onto a passivation layer of the semiconductor devices and then etching vias through the passivation layer to expose conductive test points. Testing of the semiconductor devices begins with engaging the conductive test points with high voltage test probes of a testing apparatus and then applying a high voltage test sequence to the conductive test points via the high voltage test probes. The testing of the semiconductor devices concludes by disengaging the high voltage test probes from a last one of the semiconductor devices and then removing the patterning layer from the passivation layer of the semiconductor devices.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description in association with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 is a cross-section diagram of a prior art semiconductor device that is subject to destruction during high voltage testing.



FIG. 2 is a cross-section diagram of the prior art semiconductor device having a thicker passivation layer for increasing the breakdown voltage between adjacent conductive features.



FIG. 3 is a cross-section view depicting the semiconductor device after preparation for on-wafer high voltage testing in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 4 is a graph depicting breakdown voltage tests of semiconductor devices having and not having a patterning layer.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart of method steps for conducting high voltage testing of a semiconductor device in accordance with the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure and illustrate the best mode of practicing the disclosure. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawings, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.


It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “over,” “on,” “in,” or extending “onto” another element, it can be directly over, directly on, directly in, or extend directly onto the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly over,” “directly on,” “directly in,” or extending “directly onto” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present.


Relative terms such as “below” or “above” or “upper” or “lower” or “horizontal” or “vertical” may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element, layer, or region to another element, layer, or region as illustrated in the Figures. It will be understood that these terms and those discussed above are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the Figures.


The present disclosure provides a method for on-wafer high voltage testing of semiconductor devices. The method involves adding a patterning layer onto a passivation layer of the semiconductor devices and then etching vias through the passivation layer to expose conductive test points. Testing of the semiconductor devices begins with engaging the conductive test points with high voltage test probes of a testing apparatus and then applying a high voltage test sequence to the conductive test points via the high voltage test probes. The testing of the semiconductor devices concludes by disengaging the high voltage test probes from a last one of the semiconductor devices and then removing the patterning layer from the passivation layer of the semiconductor devices. The patterning layer can be removed by any number of techniques known to those skilled in the art. For example, a common technique for removing the patterning layer is by chemical etching. Other techniques such as mechanical etching may also be employed.



FIG. 3 is a cross-section view depicting the semiconductor device 10 after preparation in accordance with the present disclosure for on-wafer high voltage testing. In a typical wafer fabrication process, a patterning layer 22 is used as a mask for etching vias through the passivation layer 12. Examples of resist materials usable for the patterning layer 22 can be, but are not limited to photoresist, polyimide, polybenzobisoxazole (PBO), and other type polymers. The patterning layer 22 can be relatively thick having a range of around about 1 μm to around about 10 μm. The patterning layer 22 also has a relatively high dielectric strength that is typical of similar materials used in wafer fabrication. A minimum dielectric strength for the patterning layer 22 significantly exceeds the dielectric strength of air, which is around 30 kV/cm. In one embodiment, a lower preferred range for the dielectric strength of the patterning layer 22 is from around about 2000 kV/cm to around about 2500 kV/cm. In another embodiment, a higher preferred range for the dielectric strength of the patterning layer 22 is from around about 4000 kV/cm to around about 5000 kV/cm.


A via 24 is shown etched through the passivation layer 12 to expose the conductive feature 14, which is typically made of metal. Another via 26 is depicted as being etched through the passivation layer 12 to expose the conductive feature 16, which is also typically made of metal. However, it is to be understood that the conductive features 14 and 16 can also be conductive nonmetals such as doped semiconductors.


In accordance with the present disclosure, the patterning layer 22 is left on the passivation layer 12 after via etching to protect the semiconductor device 10 from destructive air ionization and flashover during high voltage electrical testing. A wafer (not shown) typically includes a plurality of the semiconductor device 10. High voltage testing is typically conducted on each of a plurality of semiconductor devices 10 before the patterning layer 22 is removed from the passivation layer 12.



FIG. 4 is a graph depicting the breakdown voltage of the plurality of semiconductor devices 10 tested with and without the patterning layer 22 (FIG. 3). In the particular electrical tests conducted to produce the data shown in FIG. 4, gallium nitride (GaN) high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) made up the plurality of semiconductor devices 10. Each of the plurality of semiconductor devices 10 electrically tested included a 0.2 μm silicon nitride (SiN) passivation layer 12 deposited over conductive features 14 and 16 that in this case were top metal layers used for electrical probing and wire bonding.


Data points designated by the filled circles represent the breakdown voltage experienced by semiconductor devices tested with the patterning layer 22 added to the passivation layer 12 (FIGS. 1 and 3). Data points designated by open circles represent the breakdown voltage experienced by semiconductor devices tested without the patterning layer 22. Notice that the semiconductor devices tested without the patterning layer 22 experienced a breakdown voltage of around about 700 V due to air ionization. In contrast, the semiconductor devices tested with the patterning layer 22 experienced breakdown voltages that were considerably higher, including breakdown voltages up to around about 1400 V. In all, the semiconductor devices tested with the patterning layer 22 experienced breakdown voltages that ranged from around about 900 V to around about 1400 V.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart of method steps for conducting on-wafer high voltage testing of semiconductor devices in accordance with the present disclosure. The method steps begin by providing a wafer having semiconductor devices that include a passivation layer (step 100). A next step adds a patterning layer onto the passivation layer (step 102). Vias are then etched through the passivation layer to expose conductive test points (step 104). Next, the conductive test points are engaged with high voltage test probes of a test apparatus (step 106). A programmed high voltage test sequence of the test apparatus is then applied to the conductive test points by way of the high voltage test probes (step 108). Yet another step disengages the high voltage test probes from a last one of the semiconductor devices being tested (step 110). The process ends with the removal of the patterning layer from the passivation layer of the semiconductor devices (step 112). The patterning layer 22 can be removed by any number of techniques known to those skilled in the art. For example, a common technique for removing the patterning layer 22 is by chemical etching. Other techniques such as mechanical etching may also be employed.


Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A method for on-wafer high voltage testing of semiconductor devices comprising: providing a wafer having a plurality of semiconductor devices that include a passivation layer disposed over a plurality of conductive test points;adding a patterning layer onto the passivation layer;etching vias through the passivation layer to expose the plurality of conductive test points;providing an automated test apparatus having high voltage test probes;engaging the plurality of conductive test points through the vias using the high voltage test probes;applying a high voltage test to the plurality of conductive test points by way of the high voltage test probes;disengaging the high voltage test probes from the plurality of conductive test points; andremoving the patterning layer from the passivation layer of the semiconductor devices.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the patterning layer is made of a polymer.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the polymer is polyimide.
  • 4. The method of claim 2 wherein the polymer is polybenzobisoxazole (PBO).
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the patterning layer is made of photoresist.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the patterning layer has a thickness that ranges from around about 1 μm to around about 5 μm.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the patterning layer has a thickness that ranges from around about 5 μm to around about 10 μm.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein a dielectric strength of the patterning layer ranges from around about 2000 kV/cm to around about 2500 kV/cm.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein a dielectric strength of the patterning layer ranges from around about 4000 kV/cm to around about 5000 kV/cm.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of applying a high voltage test energizes the high voltage test probes to a voltage that ranges from around about 600 V to around about 1600 V.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of applying a high voltage test energizes the high voltage test probes to a voltage that ranges from around about 800 V to around about 2000 V.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the automated test apparatus is programmed to provide a high voltage test sequence that records predetermined electrical parameters associated with the plurality of semiconductor devices.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of semiconductor devices are gallium nitride (GaN) high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs).
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein the passivation layer has a thickness of around about 0.2 μm.
  • 15. The method of claim 13 wherein the passivation layer is made up of silicon nitride (SiN).
  • 16. The method of claim 1 wherein the passivation layer ranges in thickness from around about 0.2 μm to around about 0.3 μm.
  • 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the passivation layer ranges in thickness from around about 0.8 μm to around about 1.2 μm.
  • 18. The method of claim 1 wherein removing the patterning layer from the passivation layer is accomplished using chemical etching.
  • 19. The method of claim 1 wherein removing the patterning layer from the passivation layer is accomplished at least in part using mechanical etching.
  • 20. The method of claim 1 wherein the conductive test points are located on metal layers that are exposed by the vias.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/693,101, filed Aug. 24, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (182)
Number Name Date Kind
4317055 Yoshida et al. Feb 1982 A
4540954 Apel Sep 1985 A
4543535 Ayasli Sep 1985 A
4620207 Calviello Oct 1986 A
4788511 Schindler Nov 1988 A
5028879 Kim Jul 1991 A
5046155 Beyer et al. Sep 1991 A
5047355 Huber et al. Sep 1991 A
5107323 Knolle et al. Apr 1992 A
5118993 Yang Jun 1992 A
5208547 Schindler May 1993 A
5227734 Schindler et al. Jul 1993 A
5306656 Williams et al. Apr 1994 A
5361038 Allen et al. Nov 1994 A
5365197 Ikalainen Nov 1994 A
5389571 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1995 A
5414387 Nakahara et al. May 1995 A
5485118 Chick Jan 1996 A
5608353 Pratt Mar 1997 A
5629648 Pratt May 1997 A
5698870 Nakano et al. Dec 1997 A
5742205 Cowen et al. Apr 1998 A
5764673 Kawazu et al. Jun 1998 A
5834326 Miyachi et al. Nov 1998 A
5843590 Miura et al. Dec 1998 A
5864156 Juengling Jan 1999 A
5874747 Redwing et al. Feb 1999 A
5880640 Dueme Mar 1999 A
5914501 Antle et al. Jun 1999 A
5949140 Nishi et al. Sep 1999 A
6049250 Kintis et al. Apr 2000 A
6064082 Kawai et al. May 2000 A
6110757 Udagawa et al. Aug 2000 A
6130579 Iyer et al. Oct 2000 A
6133589 Krames et al. Oct 2000 A
6177685 Teraguchi et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191656 Nadler Feb 2001 B1
6229395 Kay May 2001 B1
6265943 Dening et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271727 Schmukler Aug 2001 B1
6285239 Iyer et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306709 Miyagi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307364 Augustine Oct 2001 B1
6313705 Dening et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329809 Dening et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333677 Dening Dec 2001 B1
6342815 Kobayashi Jan 2002 B1
6356150 Spears et al. Mar 2002 B1
6369656 Dening et al. Apr 2002 B2
6369657 Dening et al. Apr 2002 B2
6373318 Dohnke et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376864 Wang Apr 2002 B1
6377125 Pavio et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384433 Barratt et al. May 2002 B1
6387733 Holyoak et al. May 2002 B1
6392487 Alexanian May 2002 B1
6400226 Sato Jun 2002 B2
6404287 Dening et al. Jun 2002 B2
6448793 Barratt et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455877 Ogawa et al. Sep 2002 B1
6475916 Lee et al. Nov 2002 B1
6521998 Teraguchi et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525611 Dening et al. Feb 2003 B1
6528983 Augustine Mar 2003 B1
6560452 Shealy May 2003 B1
6566963 Yan et al. May 2003 B1
6589877 Thakur Jul 2003 B1
6593597 Sheu Jul 2003 B2
6608367 Gibson et al. Aug 2003 B1
6614281 Baudelot et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621140 Gibson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624452 Yu et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627552 Nishio et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633073 Rezvani et al. Oct 2003 B2
6633195 Baudelot et al. Oct 2003 B2
6656271 Yonehara et al. Dec 2003 B2
6657592 Dening et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660606 Miyabayashi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6701134 Epperson Mar 2004 B1
6701138 Epperson et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706576 Ngo et al. Mar 2004 B1
6720831 Dening et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723587 Cho et al. Apr 2004 B2
6724252 Ngo et al. Apr 2004 B2
6727762 Kobayashi Apr 2004 B1
6748204 Razavi et al. Jun 2004 B1
6750158 Ogawa et al. Jun 2004 B2
6750482 Seaford et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759907 Orr et al. Jul 2004 B2
6802902 Beaumont et al. Oct 2004 B2
6815722 Lai et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815730 Yamada Nov 2004 B2
6822842 Friedrichs et al. Nov 2004 B2
6861677 Chen Mar 2005 B2
6943631 Scherrer et al. Sep 2005 B2
7015512 Park et al. Mar 2006 B2
7026665 Smart et al. Apr 2006 B1
7033961 Smart et al. Apr 2006 B1
7042150 Yasuda May 2006 B2
7052942 Smart et al. May 2006 B1
7211822 Nagahama et al. May 2007 B2
7408182 Smart et al. Aug 2008 B1
7459356 Smart et al. Dec 2008 B1
7557421 Shealy et al. Jul 2009 B1
7719055 McNutt et al. May 2010 B1
7768758 Maier et al. Aug 2010 B2
7804262 Schuster et al. Sep 2010 B2
7968391 Smart et al. Jun 2011 B1
7974322 Ueda et al. Jul 2011 B2
8017981 Sankin et al. Sep 2011 B2
8405068 O'Keefe Mar 2013 B2
8502258 O'Keefe Aug 2013 B2
8633518 Suh et al. Jan 2014 B2
8692294 Chu et al. Apr 2014 B2
8785976 Nakajima et al. Jul 2014 B2
20010054848 Baudelot et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020031851 Linthicum et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020048302 Kimura Apr 2002 A1
20020079508 Yoshida Jun 2002 A1
20030003630 Iimura et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030122139 Meng et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030160307 Gibson et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030160317 Sakamoto et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030206440 Wong Nov 2003 A1
20030209730 Gibson et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030218183 Micovic et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040070003 Gaska et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040130037 Mishra et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040241916 Chau et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050139868 Anda Jun 2005 A1
20050189559 Saito et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050189562 Kinzer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050194612 Beach Sep 2005 A1
20050212049 Onodera Sep 2005 A1
20050225912 Pant et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050271107 Murakami et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060043385 Wang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068601 Lee et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060124960 Hirose et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060243988 Narukawa et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070093009 Baptist et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070295985 Weeks, Jr. et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080073752 Asai et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080112448 Ueda et al. May 2008 A1
20080121875 Kim May 2008 A1
20080142837 Sato et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080179737 Haga et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080190355 Chen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080272382 Kim et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080272422 Min Nov 2008 A1
20080283821 Park et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080308813 Suh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090072269 Suh et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090146185 Suh et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090146186 Kub et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090166677 Shibata et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100025657 Nagahama et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100133567 Son Jun 2010 A1
20100187575 Baumgartner et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100207164 Shibata et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100230656 O'Keefe Sep 2010 A1
20100230717 Saito Sep 2010 A1
20100258898 Lahreche Oct 2010 A1
20110017972 O'Keefe Jan 2011 A1
20110095337 Sato Apr 2011 A1
20110101300 O'Keefe May 2011 A1
20110115025 Okamoto May 2011 A1
20110127586 Bobde et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110163342 Kim et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175142 Tsurumi et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110199148 Iwamura Aug 2011 A1
20110211289 Kosowsky et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242921 Tran et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110290174 Leonard et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120018735 Ishii Jan 2012 A1
20120126240 Won May 2012 A1
20120199875 Bhalla et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120211802 Tamari Aug 2012 A1
20120218783 Imada Aug 2012 A1
20120262220 Springett Oct 2012 A1
20130277687 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130280877 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
1187229 Mar 2002 EP
1826041 Aug 2007 EP
10242584 Sep 1998 JP
2000031535 Jan 2000 JP
2003332618 Nov 2003 JP
2008148511 Jun 2008 JP
2008258419 Oct 2008 JP
20070066051 Jun 2007 KR
2004051707 Jun 2004 WO
2011162243 Dec 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (65)
Entry
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,182, mailed May 1, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed May 23, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Apr. 24, 2014, 13 pages.
Chang, S.J. et al, “Improved ESD protection by combining InGaN—GaN MQW LEDs with GaN Schottky diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Mar. 2003, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 129-131.
Chao, C-H., et al., “Theoretical demonstration of enhancement of light extraction of flip-chip GaN light-emitting diodes with photonic crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 2006, 4 pages.
Fath, P. et al., “Mechanical wafer engineering for high efficiency solar cells: An investigation of the induced surface damage,” Conference Record of the Twenty-Fourth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Dec. 5-9, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 1347-1350.
Han, D.S. et al., “Improvement of Light Extraction Efficiency of Flip-Chip Light-Emitting Diode by Texturing the Bottom Side Surface of Sapphire Substrate,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Jul. 1, 2006, vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 1406-1408.
Hibbard, D.L. et al., “Low Resistance High Reflectance Contacts to p-GaN Using Oxidized Ni/Au and Al or Ag,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83 No. 2, Jul. 14, 2003, pp. 311-313.
Lee, S.J., “Study of photon extraction efficiency in InGaN light-emitting diodes depending on chip structures and chip-mount schemes,” Optical Engineering, SPIE, Jan. 2006, vol. 45, No. 1, 14 pages.
Shchekin, O.B. et al., “High performance thin-film flip-chip InGaN—GaN light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 071109, Aug. 2006, 4 pages.
Wierer, J. et al., “High-power AlGaInN flip-chip light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78 No. 22, May 28, 2001, pp. 3379-3381.
Windisch, R. et al., “40% Efficient Thin-Film Surface-Textured Light-Emitting Diodes by Optimization of Natural Lithography,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Jul. 2000, vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 1492-1498.
Windisch, R. et al., “Impact of texture-enhanced transmission on high-efficiency surface-textured light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 8, 2001, vol. 79, No. 15, pp. 2315-2317.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Feb. 15, 2005, 2 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Dec. 16, 2004, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Jul. 23, 2004, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed May 3, 2005, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Dec. 8, 2005, 4 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,980, mailed Jan. 26, 2005, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,980, mailed May 12, 2005, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225 mailed Dec. 22, 2011, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,279, mailed Oct. 31, 2007, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,279, mailed Apr. 17, 2008, 7 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Jun. 29, 2005, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Jan. 11, 2005, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Oct. 26, 2005, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed Nov. 9, 2012, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,734, mailed Jan. 18, 2008, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,734, mailed Aug. 7, 2008, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,257 mailed Jan. 5, 2012, 13 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Feb. 2, 2010, 2 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Nov. 19, 2009, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Mar. 18, 2010, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed May 29, 2009, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Feb. 28, 2011, 8 pages.
Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Nov. 24, 2010, 4 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Dec. 15, 2008, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Apr. 1, 2008, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Mar. 9, 2009, 7 pages.
Invitation to Pay Fees for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Nov. 5, 2013, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056126, mailed Oct. 25, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056132, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056187, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 11 pages.
International Search Report for GB0902558.6, issued Jun. 15, 2010, by the UK Intellectual Property Office, 2 pages.
Examination Report for British Patent Application No. 0902558.6, mailed Nov. 16, 2012, 5 pages.
Examination Report for British Patent Application No. GB0902558.6, issued Feb. 28, 2013, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Feb. 9, 2012, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Apr. 4, 2013, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Jul. 19, 2012, 8 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed Apr. 16, 2012, 3 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225 mailed Feb. 1, 2012, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed May 2, 2012, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Feb. 12, 2014, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Sep. 25, 2014, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,182, mailed Sep. 17, 2014, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed Oct. 28, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Sep. 3, 2014, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,698, mailed Nov. 5, 2014, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed Nov. 5, 2014, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,926, mailed Dec. 19, 2014, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/942,998, mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Dec. 16, 2014, 17 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Jan. 20, 2015, 10 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Dec. 3, 2014, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Dec. 5, 2014, 16 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140057372 A1 Feb 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61693101 Aug 2012 US