This application is the U.S. National Phase of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2016/056310, entitled “Method for Operating a Gear Cutting Machine”, filed on Mar. 23, 2016, which claims priority from German Patent Application No. 10 2015 104 289.4 filed on Mar. 23, 2015, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated in their entirety.
The subject matter of the invention is a method for operating a gear cutting machine. In particular, it relates to a method for temperature compensation in a gear cutting machine.
There are various methods for the chip removing cutting of gearwheels. The correspondingly designed machines are referred to here as gear cutting machines.
It is known that the temperature of the gear cutting machine increases with time because of various procedures in the machine. In continuous operation of a machine, it reaches a so-called steady-state temperature. The steady-state temperature results in a thermally stationary state. In this state, the temperature of the machine has thermally stabilized. A stabilization of the heat flows thus occurs over time, which results in a stationary state.
It is also known that inaccuracies can occur in a machining process because of thermal expansion processes. This is because, inter alia, the greatly varying elements of the machine experience a thermal expansion with increasing temperature. A corresponding thermal contraction occurs upon cooling. On the one hand, the dimensions of the individual machine elements change with increasing temperature of the machine. Since numerous elements are connected to one another in a machine, tensions (and warping) can occur because of different coefficients of expansion, which are displayed in nonlinear expansion behavior, which cannot be computed accurately, of the machine.
The thermal behavior of a machine is influenced by the effect of heat sources and heatsinks. A differentiation is made in the case of thermal effects between internal and external influences. For example, the heat emission of motors is considered to be an internal influence. A further internal influence results from the cutting interaction of a tool with a workpiece, because mechanical energy is converted into heat here. External influences are, for example, the ambient temperature in a machine shop.
It is immediately apparent that the length, for example, of a cantilever, which is connected on one side to a machine stand, for example, increases with increasing temperature. Such a cantilever experiences a linear expansion in the longitudinal direction. In the case of complicated machine elements and more complex geometries, for example, a spindle bearing, the relationships are significantly more complex.
The operating accuracy of chip producing machines is substantially dependent on how accurately the movements in the three-dimensional space between the tool and the workpiece can be executed. Finally, relative deviations during the movement of the tool relative to the workpiece result due to all temperature-related effects. These relative deviations result in deviations on the workpiece.
Productivity and accuracy are important aspects of machine tools. The thermal accuracy of machines is gaining more and more significance in consideration of strongly increased demands in the matter of manufacturing precision. Particularly in the case of small manufacturing batches and therefore changing machine tasks, a thermally stable state cannot be achieved. In the case of machines which are in continuous use, the accuracy gains significance above all after an interruption. Moreover, one wishes to reduce the discards which typically occur after an interruption until the machine has again reached the steady-state temperature to some extent. Thus, in addition to accuracy, this also relates to questions of cost-effectiveness.
One common approach is to keep machine and surroundings at a consistent temperature level. The deformation of the machine may be avoided by way of a uniform temperature. For this purpose, on the one hand the machine shop has to be climate-controlled and, on the other hand, the machine has to be continuously operated. The expenditure in costs and energy is correspondingly high.
Another approach is monitoring the deformation of the machine by way of integrated sensors. On the basis of a mathematical model, in which the data of the sensors are further processed, the foundation can be formed for an approximate prediction of the flaws, which would arise on the workpiece. If these flaws are known, the machine can thus adapt accordingly and compensate for the flaws. The expenditure is also high here. Moreover, there have been no technological approaches up to this point which meet the high accuracy requirements.
In consideration of the above statements, the following object results. It relates to finding an approach which enables compensating for temperature-related changes of a machine. Above all, this relates to improving the accuracy of a machining process in a machine immediately after an interruption, to thus reduce the discards. A pause which is preferably longer than 15 minutes is referred to as an interruption.
In one embodiment, the method for operating a gear cutting machine comprises the steps of machining a first workpiece in the gear cutting machine wherein the temperature of the first workpiece increases as a result of the machining, determining at least one characteristic workpiece variable on the first workpiece at the increased temperature wherein a measuring device on the gear cutting machine is used for determining the at least one characteristic workpiece variable, determining a compensation value by comparing the at least one characteristic workpiece variable of the first workpiece and at least one characteristic workpiece variable of a reference workpiece wherein the characteristic workpiece variable of the reference workpiece was determined in the gear cutting machine after reaching a steady-state temperature, adjusting at least one gear cutting machine setting based upon the at least one compensation value, and machining a workpiece in the gear cutting machine after adjusting the at least one gear cutting machine setting.
In one embodiment, the reference workpiece is a workpiece which was machined while the gear cutting machine was operating at a steady state temperature. In another embodiment the machining of the first workpiece and the determination of the at least one characteristic workpiece variable are performed when the gear cutting machine is operating at less than a steady state temperature. In another embodiment, the steady-state temperature is the temperature of the gear cutting machine after a period of continuous operation. In one embodiment, the determination of the characteristic workpiece variables of the first workpiece and the reference workpiece is performed by a measuring probe of a measuring device, wherein the measuring device is part of the gear cutting machine and wherein the corresponding workpiece is not re-chucked during the determination of the characteristic workpiece variables. In another embodiment, the gear cutting machine is operating at less than a steady state temperature due to at least one of stoppage of the gear cutting machine because of a shutdown, stoppage of the gear cutting machine because of maintenance or repair, or stoppage of the gear cutting machine because of refitting. In one embodiment, the stoppage of the gear cutting machine is for a period of at least 15 minutes. In another embodiment, the stoppage of the gear cutting machine results in a reduction of the temperature measured in the gear cutting machine of more than 10% of the steady-state temperature in the gear cutting machine following a period of continuous operation. In one embodiment, the method for operating the gear cutting machine further comprises the steps of, prior to machining of the first workpiece, machining a test workpiece in the gear cutting machine, wherein the test workpiece heats up during the machining, and allowing the test workpiece to cool to ambient temperature and determining one or more characteristic variables of test workpiece in the cooled state, to determine whether the one or more charateristic variables correspond to target values.
Further details and advantages of the invention will be described hereafter on the basis of exemplary embodiments and with reference to the drawings.
Terms are used in conjunction with the present invention, which are also used in relevant publications and patents. However, it is to be noted that the use of these terms is only to serve for better comprehension. The inventive concept and the scope of protection of the patent claims are not to be restricted in the interpretation thereof by the specific selection of the terms. The invention may be readily transferred to other term systems and/or technical fields. The terms are to be applied accordingly in other technical fields.
The machine 100 is especially designed for the cutting machining (for example, grinding or milling) of the tooth flanks of gearwheels. Since this primarily relates to the mass production of gearwheels here, reference is made hereafter to a first workpiece 1, a second workpiece 2, and a third workpiece 3. Numerals are used here to specify a chronological sequence. The first workpiece 1 is machined in chronological sequence before the second and each further workpiece. The second workpiece 2 is machined after the workpiece 1 and before the workpiece 3. It is important to note in conjunction with the present invention that the second workpiece 2 does not have to be machined directly after the first workpiece 1 and the third workpiece 3 does not have to be machined directly after the second workpiece 2.
Exemplary details of the operating range of a machine 100 are shown in
It can be inferred from
In addition, the machine 100 comprises a measuring device 50, as shown in very schematic form in
The measuring device 50 is preferably designed in all embodiments so that it can be moved away, so as not to be damaged during the machining of the workpiece 1 using the tool 5. It is indicated by way of example in
In all embodiments, the machine 100 preferably comprises a reference point or a reference surface 13, which is indicated in
The measuring device 50 is preferably designed as temperature-neutral in all embodiments, so that corrupted measurement results are not obtained due to temperature changes.
In all embodiments, the measuring device 50 is preferably positioned as close as possible to the workpiece spindle 7 and not in the region of the tool 5 (temperature neutral with respect to its location relative to the workpiece 1) or the measuring device 50 is to be referenced before the measurement (see
In all embodiments, the measuring device 50 preferably comprises a temperature-neutral and rigid construction, so that it also remains stable under various temperature influences. The essential elements of the measuring device 50 can be constructed, for example, from a combination of carbon fiber composite materials and ceramic (for a minimum weight and high for a high level of rigidity). The measuring standards which are used can be manufactured, for example, from a temperature-neutral ceramic. Additionally or alternatively, the measuring device 50 can be embodied as temperature-compensated (for example, having an active dynamic temperature compensation).
In machines 100 which are equipped with a reference point or a reference surface 13, the measuring device 50 can get a spatial reference during referencing, for example, by the sensor 51 scanning the reference point or the reference surface 13. The coordinate values of the reference point or the reference surface 13 can then be used during subsequent computations as a computer reference, for example.
Because of the cutting machining, a workpiece temperature TW results, which reaches the value T1 indicated in
The measuring device 50 is now used, as indicated in
Several exemplary numeric values from practice are provided hereafter. The steady-state temperature TVH of a machine 100 is dependent, inter alia, on the ambient temperature. Temperature differences between a machine just put into operation and an operationally-hot machine of 20° to greater than 30° result during milling, for example. The temperatures of the workpieces 1 can increase to up to 60° C. after milling machining, i.e., they experience a temperature increase by approximately 40° C. due to the machining. The temperature changes on a grinding machine are significantly below these values.
Since blanks 4 or workpieces 1 are machined in the machine 100 which are turned parts, for example, the circumferential surface thereof (cylinder lateral surface in a spur gear or truncated cone surface in a bevel gear) are not are not accurately dimensioned. The scanning of the circumferential surface using the measuring device 50 therefore does not result in usable workpiece variables, even if the measuring device 50 operates accurately in the event of changing temperatures or measures in a temperature-compensated manner. According to the invention, the characteristic workpiece variable W.1 is therefore preferably determined in all embodiments on surfaces or points which were just machined in the machine 100. In the example of
Further aspects of the invention will be described hereafter on the basis of the method steps which are executed during the operation of the gear cutting machine 100. The machine 100 according to the invention is distinguished in that it is designed for carrying out the method described in greater detail hereafter. A suitable machine 100 preferably also comprises, in addition to the required axes, clamping means, and drives, the mentioned measuring device 50. Furthermore, software is used, which is installed in the machine 100 or in a system connectable to the machine 100.
The method preferably comprises the following steps:
This example is clarified further on the basis of
A fixed coordinate axis x is shown on the left in each of
The rotational axis of the tool RW is in the plane of the drawing in
After the workpiece 1 has been machined, workpiece 1 and tool 5 are separated in relation to one another. This step is shown in
In the described example, for example, the gap width of the reference workpiece R is somewhat less than the gap width of the first workpiece 1. The difference of the two gap widths (i.e., the difference of the two characteristic workpiece variables W.R and W.1) is computed in the scope of the compensation determination.
In a subsequent method step, as shown in
According to the invention, the determination of characteristic workpiece variables can be repeated from time to time while the machine 100 heats up further. Thus, for example, the third workpiece 3 and the fourth to tenth workpieces can be manufactured with the same compensation value as described in conjunction with
To preclude faults after an interruption (for example, because an incorrect tool was chucked), before carrying out the machining of the first workpiece 1, the following steps can be carried out on another workpiece 0:
This can be carried out in a separate measuring machine, which is connectable via a closed loop to the machine 100.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2015 104 289 | Mar 2015 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/056310 | 3/23/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/150986 | 9/29/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4533858 | Tlaker | Aug 1985 | A |
4714387 | Seishichi | Dec 1987 | A |
5421683 | Keehn | Jun 1995 | A |
5904457 | Suwijn | May 1999 | A |
20060218811 | Sato | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20100023297 | Kikuchi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20130289917 | Chang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2833923 | Mar 1979 | DE |
2394770 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2007090871 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/EP2016/056310, dated Jun. 24, 2016, 2 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/EP2016/056310, dated Oct. 5, 2017, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180052440 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |