The invention relates to a method for operating a packaging machine.
DE 10 2010 028 697 A1, for example, discloses a generic packaging machine. This packaging machine comprises in particular a drive motor by means of which a functional unit, namely a screw conveyor, can be driven. With generic packaging machines, a parameter set having a load parameter is stored in the control, the load parameter limiting the torque which can be maximally exerted by the motor and the current which can be maximally consumed by the drive motor. The load parameter prevents the drive motor from becoming overloaded, as could happen when the screw conveyor becomes blocked, for example.
A problem of the known packaging machines is that different kinds of packaging are produced using the packaging machines. Depending on the corresponding packaging to be produced, the functional unit driven by the drive motor can be retrofitted. Should, for instance, smaller packaging be filled and sealed, the corresponding screw conveyor of a smaller size is installed. This can be problematic since the load parameter which limits the maximum current consumption and the maximum torque of the corresponding drive motor remains unchanged. Should a functional error arise at the functional unit, for instance due to packaging of the powder to be conveyed by the screw conveyor, then the limit of the output to be generated by the drive motor as programmed with the load parameter is not reached until after considerable damage has already been done to the corresponding functional unit, e.g. by the corresponding small screw conveyor becoming unscrewed.
Starting from this state of the art, it is the object of the invention at hand to propose a new method for operating a packaging machine by means of which the disadvantages described above are avoided.
Advantageous embodiments of the invention are the subject matter of the dependent claims.
With the method according to the invention, a parameter set having a load parameter is first loaded as commonly practiced, the load parameter limiting the torque or the current consumption of the motor to a predefined maximum when producing a specific packaging. This predefined maximum of the performance capacity which is represented by the load parameter can be configured specifically to prevent the drive motor from becoming overloaded.
Subsequently, the packaging machine is put into operation and the corresponding packaging is produced using the corresponding required functional units of the packaging machine. While the packaging machine is in operation for producing the packaging, the maximally occurring actual value of the torque mustered at the motor and the maximally occurring actual value of the current consumed at the motor is measured. If the packaging is a correspondingly small packaging, this maximally occurring actual value typically lies far below the hitherto set load parameter.
In the next step, a new load parameter is calculated from the measured actual value of the maximally mustered torque or the maximally consumed current. This new load parameter represents precisely the limit of the performance capacity of the drive motor which has to be mustered during the fault-free normal operation of the packaging machine when producing the corresponding packaging. Naturally, the new load parameter can then be set slightly above the measured actual value to avoid undesired error messages when exceeding a too narrow load parameter.
Lastly, the new load parameter which is derived from the measured actual value of the maximally mustered torques and/or the maximally consumed current is saved in a parameter set allocated specifically to the packaging to be produced. During further operation of the packaging machine, the specifically allocated parameter set can always be loaded into the control of the packaging machine whenever a corresponding packaging is to be produced using the packaging machine, thereby easily precluding damage not only to the drive motor but also to the functional unit driven by the drive motor.
The maximum current consumed during production of packaging or the maximum torque mustered during production of a packaging unit can fluctuate within certain tolerance thresholds. In order to be able to take such fluctuations into account when determining the new load parameter, it is particularly advantageous if the new load parameter is determined after a predefined minimum number of packaging has been produced and after the arisen maximum actual value has been measured correspondingly. An average from the different maximum actual values can be used for determining the new load parameter. Alternatively thereto, it is also possible to use the largest of the measured maximum actual values for determining the new load parameter.
Different approaches are viable for the continued use of the new load parameter. According to a first method variation, the old load parameter is automatically overwritten after a new load parameter for a specific packaging has been determined.
Alternatively to automatically overwriting the old load parameter, the use of the new load parameter can be tied to the user first affirming a corresponding message before the old load parameter is overwritten with the new load parameter.
It is of generally no importance in which manner the new load parameter is determined as a function of the measured actual value. Known calculating formulas can be easily used therefor. A particularly simple and easily understandable calculating formula is found in the use of a linear formula F (new load parameter)=f (maximum actual value).
According to a preferred embodiment variation, it is intended to calculate the new load parameter as a percentage of the maximally measured actual value. Preferably, the new load parameter can be 110% or 120% or 130% or 140% or 150% of the maximally measured actual value.
If the newly saved load parameter is exceeded during production of packaging, different reactions can be triggered. According to one variation, a warning is issued when a first load parameter is exceeded. If the measured actual value exceeds a load parameter of 110%, for example, of the maximum actual value measured according to the invention, then a warning is displayed to the user indicating a potential problem due to the increased load.
According to a second method alternative, it is intended to issue an error message when a second load parameter, for example of 130% of the maximum actual value measured using the method according to the invention, is exceeded.
According to a third method alternative, if the fourth load parameter, for example of 150% of the maximum actual value measured using the method according to the invention, is exceeded, an emergency shutdown signal can be issued to automatically shut down the machine and thus prevent damage to the mechanical functional units due to undesired overloads.
An embodiment of the invention is schematically illustrated in the drawings and is described in an exemplary manner in the following.
In the figures,
A metering device 01 is sketched in
A gap 08 is provided between stirrer 06 and funnel 03. From a functional viewpoint, gap 08 is as small as possible though large enough to prevent contact between stirrer 06 and funnel 03. The same principle applies to gap 07 between tube 04 and metering screw 05.
Nevertheless, collision of the corresponding parts cannot be precluded by means of a small gap 07 or 08.
Screw conveyor 05 is driven by a drive motor 09. For drive motor 09, a load parameter 10 (cf.
It is obvious that maximum actual value 13 of the torque mustered by drive motor 09 is far below load parameter 10 saved in the control. If actual torque 12 were to exceed maximum value 13 attained during normal operation during a fault, such as when the powder to be conveyed is packaged, then a fault would not be recognized by the control until load parameter 10 has been reached, though massive mechanical damage will have already been done to the screw conveyor in this instance.
In order to preclude such damage, actual value 13 measured during normal operation is used for determining a new load parameter 14.
As shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2018 101 180.6 | Jan 2018 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/050447 | 1/9/2019 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/141566 | 7/25/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3616968 | James et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
5568028 | Uchiyama et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5587931 | Jones et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5836136 | Highberger | Nov 1998 | A |
10948894 | Brambach et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20080218112 | Beifus et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080272725 | Bojrup et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090033265 | Fleischmann et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100060225 | Kosaka | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20130186515 | Kleiner et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20160114923 | Kiyota | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20170139391 | Yamamoto | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102010028697 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102013207363 | Oct 2014 | DE |
102013207363 | Oct 2014 | DE |
102016208670 | Nov 2017 | DE |
0661212 | Jul 1995 | EP |
1757522 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1168591 | Jun 2011 | EP |
3046250 | Jul 2016 | EP |
2007028865 | Feb 2007 | JP |
9640558 | Dec 1996 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210141370 A1 | May 2021 | US |