Method for preparing a physical plaster model

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9975294
  • Patent Number
    9,975,294
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 23, 2014
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 22, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
The invention provides a method for creating a physical teeth model. The method comprises the following steps: providing a virtual three dimensional (3D) representation of a patient's dentition that comprises at least a region of the teeth that includes a tooth stump on which a crown is to be fitted or a region on to which a bridge is to be fitted; and preparing a physical model of the jaws of a subject from a blank, based on information from said virtual 3D image.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of dentistry and in particular to a method of preparing plaster models for use in orthodontics, prosthodontics and other aspects of dental medicine.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

For a dentist or a dental technician, one of the main difficulties in making a working physical model of the teeth, including the inter-occlusal relationship between the jaws (also known by the term “master cast” or “working cast”), lies in respecting the position of a patient's artificial jaws when the teeth are in Centric Occlusion position. Separate molding of the upper and the lower teeth followed by the manual articulation of the two parts is a constant source of error. The precision of the cast depends on several factors, including, inter alia, the accuracy of the impressions and wax bites, the material from which the cast is constructed, and the identification of the anatomic. In addition, traditional methods using pins do not prevent linear expansion of the cast. This can result in the deformation of the new teeth that do not correspond perfectly to the original. Thus, the more precisely the working cast reproduces the anatomy of the mouth, the more accurate will be the spatial position, and the static and dynamic relationships. This provides a better possibility of producing a biomechanically acceptable restoration.


In order to reproduce with high precision the mechanical equivalent of functional and non-functional movements within the mouth, articulators (also known by the term “occluding devices”) have been and still are under development. The articulators are used to precisely hold models of a patient's upper and lower teeth, so a dentist can study their bite or make a restoration.


Articulators are primarily used when a crown needs to be prepared. According to current practice, after diagnosing in a patient the need for a crown or a bridge, the dentist cuts the tooth to be reconstructed by the crown or bridge and prepares two impressions and a wax bite of the patient's jaws. One impression is of the area prepared for the crown and the surrounding area. The other impression is of the opposite jaw. A wax bite is used to record the spatial relation between the jaws at occlusion. Based on the impressions, wax bite and written instructions of the dentist, a technician prepares in a lab the corresponding plaster jaws which are trimmed and mounted on an articulator. Using the wax bites, the spatial relation between the jaws is determined. At this stage, the tooth within the preparation to be reconstructed is temporarily separated from the plaster so that the area with the anatomic information (the area defining the anatomic contour) and the finish line are exposed. The finish line is typically marked manually by the lab technician in ink on the preparation and a crown is built based on the resulting preparation. The quality of the crown prepared is examined by placing the crown on the preparation in the articulator and verifying that there is a good occlusion of the crown with the opposite teeth. If in the affirmative, the crown is sent to the dentist for placement on the preparation in the patient's mouth.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention concerns a unique method of preparing a physical working teeth model of teeth, e.g. a model made of hard plaster, used for the fabrication of orthodontics and prosthodontics Crown or Bridges. The method utilizes a three dimensional (3D) virtual image of the patient's dentition or parts of it. Based on digital data representing said 3D image, a physical 3D teeth model is constructed.


The term “teeth model” will be used to denote a physical, three-dimensional representation of teeth in a solid matrix having a surface relief corresponding to the teeth arrangement of the individual. Such a model may be a “positive teeth model”, comprising a teeth replica, namely, a model where each tooth is represented by a projection or bulge having contours identical in size and shape to the corresponding tooth; or a “negative teeth model”, where each tooth is represented by a cavity or recess with contours identical in size, but opposite in shape to the contours of the corresponding tooth.


Thus, according to one embodiment, the invention provides a method for preparing a physical positive working model of a patient's dentition. According to another embodiment, the invention provides a method for preparing a physical negative model from which a positive working model can be fabricated, according to known dentistry procedures.


The method of the invention is of particular use in the construction of crowns or bridges. Thus, according to the invention, the 3D virtual image comprises at least the region of the teeth that includes a tooth stump on which a crown is to be fitted or a region on to which a bridge is to be fitted. Based on the virtual image of the dentition, a physical model of the two jaws is prepared. Thereafter, the resulting model, being positive or negative, as the case may be, is used for a variety of purposes, for example to prepare a crown, a bridge or other dental appliance; to analyze the relationship between the upper and lower jaws; to show the patient the crown or bridge; etc.


Alternatively, the virtual image may be further manipulated and based on the digital data representing the image, a virtual crown or bridge is constructed. Based on the virtual image of the crown or bridge, a physical model of the crown or bridge is prepared.


A virtual three-dimensional (3D) image is obtained e.g. in the manner as described in PCT publication No. W097/03622 or PCT publication No. W000/08415.


The dentist (or the technician, as the case may be) may construct a virtual image of the patient's dentition either with or without the virtual image of the crown or bridge, and then may send such data to the lab technician. There, a physical model may be prepared, e.g. by milling, 3D lithography or by any other appropriate means, according to said data. The physical model prepared by the technician can be sent to the dentist, for his approval (the physical model can also be fabricated at the dentist's office).


The physical model has typically one member that represents the upper jaw and another that represents the lower jaw. It order to render it easy to match these two members to one another, they may be produced with markings or appropriate physical alignment arrangement for aligning the jaws to represent the alignment of the jaws of the patient. Said data that includes the virtual image thus preferably includes also data bits for producing such markings or arrangement.


Markings may be in the form of depressions or protrusions on the face of the members that are made such so as to provide the technician with a tool for the proper alignment of the two members. A physical alignment arrangement may include a mounting arrangement for mounting the two members to an articulator to yield a proper occlusion alignment. By another example, the physical alignment arrangement may include one or more alignment reference components in one member that once fitted with one or more corresponding components in the other member, ensure proper alignment of the two members.


Thus, the present invention provides a dental articulator that precisely simulates the occlusion relationship of the jaws as well as the three-dimensional movement of a human jaw.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to understand the invention and to see how it may be carried out in practice, a preferred embodiment will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 shows, by way of a block diagram, a computerized device for constructing a virtual impression of the patient's dentition.



FIG. 2 shows, by way of a block diagram, a computerized device for milling a plaster model, based on the information from the virtual impression, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 shows a perspective view of the plaster model arranged on an articulator.



FIG. 4 shows a perspective view of the plaster model with references for aligning the jaws;



FIG. 5 shows, by way of a flow chart, a method for fabricating a physical teeth model, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 illustrate two specific examples, respectively, of the method of FIG. 5.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As is true in any method of making a physical model, e.g. a plaster model of a patient's dentition, it is most important to start with an accurate representation of the jaws and teeth and the inter-occlusal relationship between the jaws. For this purpose, the instant invention relies on a virtual model of the patient's dentition.


Digital data representing a virtual teeth model may be obtained by a variety of methods, such as that described in PCT Application No. PCT/IL96/00036 (publication No. W097/03622) and in PCT Application No. PCT/IL99/0043 1 (publication No. W000/08415). The virtual three-dimensional image may be manipulated, for example, in a manner described in PCT Application No. PCT/IL99/00577 (publication No. W000/25677). In particular, the virtual three-dimensional (3D) image is obtained by utilizing a physical negative teeth model, e.g. a negative teeth model that comprises the teeth impression by means of an impression matrix. The physical negative teeth model may be used as such, thus providing digital negative representation of the patient's dentition, from which a digital positive representation of the patient's dentition may be digitally obtained.


Alternatively, the physical negative teeth model may be used to prepare a physical positive teeth model, from which a digital positive teeth representation is provided. After the virtual image is generated, the display is typically a computerized display, provided with software permitting the technician to visualize the virtual image from different angles. As will be appreciated, the invention is not limited to any specific display means and any means for presenting the image such as, for example, in a printed format, on a computer display screen, etc., may be employed in accordance with the invention.


In most situations, the dentist will take three virtual impressions. One impression is of the preparation area for the crown, bridge or other dental appliances, along with the surrounding teeth. Another impression is of the teeth on the opposite jaw. The third impression records the spatial relationship between and the spacing of the two jaws in a centric occlusion. This information from the virtual impressions is placed in a 3D file that contains the two jaws and the spatial relationship between them in occlusion. Thereafter, the 3D file may be transferred to the laboratory.


Reference is made to FIG. 1 showing a computerized device generally designated 20 including a processor 22 and a display unit 24. Running in the processor 22 is a first software utility 26 that receives an input of a three dimensional virtual teeth model and then processes, automatically or through the user, manipulable software utility 28, to construct a three dimensional virtual teeth model that includes the region that is to be treated, which can then be fed for display to display unit 24. By this means, the virtual impression of the dentition is made and the information may then be stored. The technician may then simulate any treatment area on the computer. For example, the cutout in the tooth for the crown can be simulated, along with fitting of the crown.


Reference is now being made to FIG. 2 showing a system generally designated 40. In FIG. 2, like components to those shown in FIG. 1, are given the same reference numerals shifted by 20 (namely component 42, for example, is 30 functionally identical to component 22 in FIG. 1). System 40 of FIG. 2 includes an apparatus 50 that is used to construct a physical model utilizing digital data received from software utility 48. For this purpose, a Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling machine 50 may be used. However, the invention is not limited to the use of a CNC machine and any other CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing) technology that can produce a physical model out of virtual data may be used.


To manufacture a crown, a bridge, or any dental appliance, the lab technician requires two physical jaws models mounted on an articulator or placed in the correct spatial orientation one against the other. According to this method, the information for the two jaws and their spatial relationship in occlusion is in a digital 3D file. Alternatively, or in addition, the proper occlusion may be determined in a manner disclosed in WO 98/52493. The computer guided milling (or other technology) machine is connected to the computer with the 3D file of the virtual impression, and then a physical model of each one of the jaws is milled from a blank made of plaster, or other appropriate material taking into consideration also the spatial relation between the two jaws and their occlusion. At this point, the technician has his necessary physical model and can proceed with making the crown or the bridge.


Based on information from the virtual 3D image, the dentist or a technician may generate a 3D model of a crown to be fitted on a tooth stump or of a bridge to be fitted on the tooth surface, to generate a digital file on which basis the lab technician, through the use of a computer driven milling machine, may generate a physical crown, bridge or other dental appliances.


It should be noted that the physical model generated by device 40 might be a positive model or alternatively, a negative model. FIG. 3 shows plaster cast members 100 and 102 fabricated according to the invention and representing the upper and lower jaws, respectively. The members 100 and 102 can be mounted on an articulator 104 to simulate the proper occlusion relation. For that both members have articulator engagement portions 106 with reference holes 108 that can be registered with holes 110 engagement bit 112 of articulator 104, which engagement is through pins 114. The engagement portion 106 with the reference holes 108, are initially defined in the virtual 3D image. In this model the proper inter jaw occlusion are first defined, as explained above, and after the proper inter jaw occlusion is determined, the virtual 3D model may be virtually combined with an articulator to define the articulator-engagement portion with its reference holes.


This is then included in the digital file used to produce the plaster model. The reference holes may be produced automatically by the milling machine. However, the reference holes may be difficult to produce by the milling machine and may need to be produced after milling, as a separate step, for example, based on markings produced automatically during the milling procedure.


Reference is now made to FIG. 4 that shows another embodiment of a manner for proper alignment of the two cast members. The two cast members 120 and 122 are produced each with a corresponding aligning structures 124 and 126. Each of these aligning structures includes positioning reference components 124R and 126R, respectively, the former having an end abutment, that fits into a matching recess in the latter. This alignment structure is first produced virtually after virtual alignment of the two jaw members and thereafter structures 124 and 126 may then be added. The data file prepared from the virtual model and that is utilized for manufacture of the physical members 120 and 122, this includes, according to this embodiment, also data for integral production of said structures.


As may be appreciated, the lab technician has to build a crown, a bridge, or other dental appliances, that will have a good fit on the prepared area of the tooth. Contact with the surrounding teeth must be good, and such as in the case of crowns, there must also be correct contact with teeth on the opposing jaw. If the crown does not fit correctly, the bite will be affected and the crown will not fit comfortably in the mouth. The articulator is used to mount the model, so the crown and be formed and properly fitted. This is why the model must be highly accurate, or the crown will not fit correctly in the patient's mouth. It is from this information that an accurate 3D file of the dentition is created, and the milling of the plaster physical mold is based on the information in this 3D file. Due to the enhanced accuracy of the information about the dentition, the physical model can be made more accurately, thereby leading to a more accurate manufacture of the crown.


Reference is now being made to FIG. 5, and the reader is referred to FIG. 2 for a complete understanding of their function. Illustrated in FIG. 5 are the main steps 100 in a method of the invention for the fabrication of a physical teeth model utilizing the device 40 and a CAM machine (CNC milling machine 50, in this example) connectable to the device 40, as shown in FIG. 2.


At step 125, the device 40 receives an input of a 3D virtual teeth model (constituting a 3D representation of a patient's dentition), and based on which, generates, at 140, digital information for the fabrication of a physical teeth model. Then at step 160, the machine 50 fabricates the physical teeth model.


It should be noted that additional steps might be needed and carried out manually or automatically, e.g., for the generation of additional digital information, which can be displayed by the display utility 24, as previously explained. It should also be noted that the machine 50 does not need to be part of the device 40 and can be a separate utility. In the later case, the digital information generated by the device 40 is transmitted to the machine 50 via a direct connection (through wires or wireless communication means) or via a communication network (e.g. the Internet).


According to the common CAD techniques, soft materials such as wax may be used for the fabrication of the physical model. However, the fabricated physical model made of such relative soft materials is easily deformable by mechanical stresses. This outcome is highly undesirable in the context of dentistry, in which a positive working model is used, for example for the creation of orthodontic or prosthodontics appliances. Any deformation in the fabricated positive model degrades the precision of the appliance based on the positive model, as well as degrades the quality of the orthodontics and prosthodontics treatment.


The present invention, by one of its embodiment, solves the above problem by providing a method for the fabrication of a precise negative model, from which a positive working model can then be produced, for example from a hard plaster, by utilizing traditional dentistry procedures.



FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 more specifically illustrate flow diagrams 200 and 300 (respectively) for the fabrication of a negative teeth model utilizing the method of FIG. 5. In the example of FIG. 6, the device 40 receives an input of a 3D virtual positive teeth model (step 220), and generates digital information for the fabrication of a physical negative teeth model (step 240). The machine 50, being a part of or connectable to the device 40, operates to fabricate the physical negative teeth model (step 260). At a later stage (not shown), the fabricated physical negative teeth model is used for the fabrication of a positive working model, according to known procedures, e.g. by filling the negative cast with a hard plaster and removing the negative cast.


In the example of FIG. 7, the device 40 receives an input of a 3D virtual negative teeth model (step 320). The processing of this data for the generation of the digital information for the fabrication of the physical negative teeth model (at step 340) might not need the generation of a digital positive model. However, an additional step (not shown) can be carried out between steps 320 and 340, in which a digital positive model, from which the information is derived, is generated.


As mentioned above, the fabricated physical model can bear marking or articulator engagement portions, for proper relations. When a negative model is fabricated, it bears a negative marking and/or engagement portions (e.g. depressions), thus providing the positive working model with positive marking and/or engagement portions (e.g. corresponding protrusions).


It should be noted that a dedicated device could implement the procedures 100, 200 and 300. Alternatively, these procedures can be integrated with other computerized dentistry methods, e.g. virtual treatment plan and the like.


While some preferred embodiments have been shown and illustrated, it is to be understood by a skilled person that it is not intended thereby to limit the disclosure, but rather it is intended to cover all modifications and arrangements falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A computer system for generating a virtual model of teeth, comprising: a processor operably coupled to a computer readable storage medium comprising instructions which, when executed, cause the processor to: receive a virtual model of a patient's dentition including a virtual upper jaw member and a virtual lower jaw member respectively corresponding to at least a part of each upper and lower jaw of the patient's dentition;receive data representative of at least a spatial relationship between the upper and lower jaws in occlusion; andincorporate in the virtual model a virtual alignment arrangement configured to provide virtual occlusion alignment between the virtual upper and lower jaw members according to the spatial relationship, the virtual alignment arrangement comprising a first virtual alignment structure of the virtual upper jaw member that receives a second virtual alignment structure of the virtual lower jaw member or the virtual alignment arrangement comprises a first virtual alignment structure of the virtual lower jaw member that receives a second virtual alignment structure of the virtual upper jaw member, thereby defining an updated virtual model,wherein the first virtual alignment structure comprises a first plurality of virtual positioning reference components and the second virtual alignment structure comprises a second plurality of virtual positioning reference components, the first plurality of virtual positioning reference components configured to fit with the second plurality of virtual positioning reference components in order to yield proper occlusion alignment of the virtual upper and lower jaw members.
  • 2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to output data for preparing a physical model based on the updated virtual model, wherein the physical model comprises a physical alignment arrangement corresponding to the virtual alignment arrangement.
  • 3. The system according to claim 2, wherein the data for preparing the physical model includes instructions for a computer driven machine to prepare the physical model.
  • 4. The system according to claim 2, wherein the data for preparing the physical model includes a data file comprising updated virtual model data for 3D lithography manufacturing.
  • 5. The system according to claim 2, wherein the virtual model further comprises virtual dental surfaces including a region including at least one dental preparation.
  • 6. The system according to claim 5, wherein the data for preparing the physical model further comprises instructions for manufacturing a crown or a bridge to be fitted on the at least one dental preparation.
  • 7. The system according to claim 6, wherein the data for preparing the physical model further comprises instructions for a computer driven 3D lithography machine to make a physical model of the region that includes the at least one dental preparation, the physical model including a tooth stump on which a crown is to be fitted, and a physical model of the crown to be fitted on the tooth stump.
  • 8. The system according to claim 6, wherein the data for preparing the physical model further comprises instructions for a computer driven 3D lithography machine to make a physical model of the region of the teeth on which a bridge is to be fitted and a physical model of the bridge to be fitted on the dental preparation.
  • 9. The system according to claim 6, wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the processor to generate a virtual model of a crown or bridge to be fitted on the at least one dental preparation based on information from the virtual model.
  • 10. The system according to claim 9, wherein the data for preparing the physical model further comprises instructions for a CAM machine to prepare a physical crown or bridge based on the virtual model of the crown or bridge.
  • 11. The system according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the virtual upper or lower jaw members have markings configured to guide proper occlusion alignment of the virtual upper and lower jaw members.
  • 12. The system according to claim 1, wherein the first plurality of virtual positioning reference components and second plurality of virtual positioning reference components comprise end abutments and matching recesses.
  • 13. The system according to claim 1, wherein the updated virtual model comprises an articulator engagement portion, the articulator engagement portion being defined by virtually combining the virtual model with a virtual articulator model.
CROSS-REFERENCE

This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/886,159, filed May 2, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,845,330, issued Sep. 30, 2014, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/714,857, filed on Mar. 7, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,454,364, issued Jun. 4, 2013, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/676,257, filed Oct. 2, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,220,124, issued May 22, 2007, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/422,782, filed Oct. 31, 2002, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/415,931, filed Oct. 3, 2002, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (202)
Number Name Date Kind
2138254 Mink Nov 1938 A
2333795 Kellerman et al. Nov 1943 A
2467432 Kesling Apr 1949 A
2621406 Phee Dec 1952 A
3407500 Kesling Oct 1968 A
3576075 Scott Apr 1971 A
3600808 Reeve Aug 1971 A
3660900 Andrews May 1972 A
3683502 Wallshein Aug 1972 A
3738005 Cohen Jun 1973 A
3860803 Levine Jan 1975 A
3916526 Schudy Nov 1975 A
3922786 Lavin Dec 1975 A
3950851 Bergersen Apr 1976 A
3965576 Eveland Jun 1976 A
3983628 Acevedo Oct 1976 A
4014096 Dellinger Mar 1977 A
4184255 Gordon Jan 1980 A
4195046 Kesling Mar 1980 A
4253828 Coles et al. Mar 1981 A
4273533 Della Croce Jun 1981 A
4279595 Della Croce Jul 1981 A
4315740 Mercer et al. Feb 1982 A
4324546 Heitlinger et al. Apr 1982 A
4324547 Arcan et al. Apr 1982 A
4348178 Kurz Sep 1982 A
4478580 Barrut Oct 1984 A
4500294 Lewis Feb 1985 A
4504225 Yoshii Mar 1985 A
4505673 Yoshii Mar 1985 A
4521188 Metzler Jun 1985 A
4526540 Dellinger Jul 1985 A
4573917 Erickson Mar 1986 A
4575330 Hull Mar 1986 A
4575805 Moermann et al. Mar 1986 A
4591341 Andrews May 1986 A
4609349 Cain Sep 1986 A
4611288 Duret et al. Sep 1986 A
4656860 Orthuber et al. Apr 1987 A
4663720 Duret et al. May 1987 A
4664626 Kesling May 1987 A
4676747 Kesling Jun 1987 A
4742464 Duret et al. May 1988 A
4755139 Abbatte et al. Jul 1988 A
4763791 Halverson et al. Aug 1988 A
4786253 Morais Nov 1988 A
4793803 Martz Dec 1988 A
4798534 Breads Jan 1989 A
4812127 Hernandez Mar 1989 A
4836778 Baumrind et al. Jun 1989 A
4837732 Brandestini et al. Jun 1989 A
4850864 Diamond Jul 1989 A
4850865 Napolitano Jul 1989 A
4856991 Breads et al. Aug 1989 A
4877398 Kesling Oct 1989 A
4880380 Martz Nov 1989 A
4889238 Batchelor Dec 1989 A
4890608 Steer Jan 1990 A
4935635 O'Harra Jun 1990 A
4936862 Walker et al. Jun 1990 A
4937928 van der Zel Jul 1990 A
4941826 Loran et al. Jul 1990 A
4964770 Steinbichler et al. Oct 1990 A
4975052 Spencer et al. Dec 1990 A
4983334 Adell Jan 1991 A
5011405 Lemchen Apr 1991 A
5017133 Miura May 1991 A
5027281 Rekow et al. Jun 1991 A
5035613 Breads et al. Jul 1991 A
5055039 Abbatte et al. Oct 1991 A
5059118 Breads et al. Oct 1991 A
5100316 Wildman Mar 1992 A
5121333 Riley et al. Jun 1992 A
5125832 Kesling Jun 1992 A
5128870 Erdman et al. Jul 1992 A
5130064 Smalley Jul 1992 A
5131843 Hilgers et al. Jul 1992 A
5131844 Marinaccio et al. Jul 1992 A
5139419 Andreiko et al. Aug 1992 A
5145364 Martz et al. Sep 1992 A
5160262 Alpern et al. Nov 1992 A
5176517 Truax Jan 1993 A
5184306 Erdman et al. Feb 1993 A
5186623 Breads et al. Feb 1993 A
5257203 Riley et al. Oct 1993 A
5273429 Rekow et al. Dec 1993 A
5278756 Lemchen et al. Jan 1994 A
5328362 Watson et al. Jul 1994 A
5338198 Wu et al. Aug 1994 A
5340309 Robertson Aug 1994 A
5342202 Deshayes Aug 1994 A
5368478 Andreiko et al. Nov 1994 A
5382164 Stern Jan 1995 A
5395238 Andreiko et al. Mar 1995 A
5440326 Quinn Aug 1995 A
5440496 Andersson et al. Aug 1995 A
5447432 Andreiko et al. Sep 1995 A
5452219 Dehoff et al. Sep 1995 A
5454717 Andreiko et al. Oct 1995 A
5456600 Andreiko et al. Oct 1995 A
5431562 Andreiko et al. Nov 1995 A
5474448 Andreiko et al. Dec 1995 A
RE35169 Lemchen et al. Mar 1996 E
5518397 Andreiko et al. May 1996 A
5528735 Strasnick et al. Jun 1996 A
5533895 Andreiko et al. Jul 1996 A
5542842 Andreiko et al. Aug 1996 A
5549476 Stern Aug 1996 A
5562448 Mushabac Oct 1996 A
5569033 Michael Oct 1996 A
5573397 Silva Nov 1996 A
5587912 Andersson et al. Dec 1996 A
5605459 Kuroda et al. Feb 1997 A
5607305 Andersson et al. Mar 1997 A
5611686 Silva Mar 1997 A
5614075 Andre Mar 1997 A
5621648 Crump Apr 1997 A
5645420 Bergersen Jul 1997 A
5645421 Slootsky Jul 1997 A
5655653 Chester Aug 1997 A
5683243 Andreiko et al. Nov 1997 A
5692521 Leasure-Nelson Dec 1997 A
5692894 Schwartz et al. Dec 1997 A
5725376 Poirier Mar 1998 A
5725378 Wang Mar 1998 A
5733126 Andersson et al. Mar 1998 A
5740267 Echerer et al. Apr 1998 A
5742700 Yoon et al. Apr 1998 A
5788489 Huffman Aug 1998 A
5799100 Clarke et al. Aug 1998 A
5800174 Andersson Sep 1998 A
5823778 Schmitt et al. Oct 1998 A
5848115 Little et al. Dec 1998 A
5857853 van Nifterick et al. Jan 1999 A
5866058 Batchelder et al. Feb 1999 A
5879158 Doyle et al. Mar 1999 A
5880961 Crump Mar 1999 A
5880962 Andersson et al. Mar 1999 A
5934288 Avila et al. Aug 1999 A
5957686 Anthony Sep 1999 A
5964587 Sato Oct 1999 A
5971754 Sondhi et al. Oct 1999 A
5975893 Chishti et al. Nov 1999 A
6015289 Andreiko et al. Jan 2000 A
6044309 Honda Mar 2000 A
6049743 Baba Apr 2000 A
6062861 Andersson May 2000 A
6068482 Snow May 2000 A
6099314 Kopelman et al. Aug 2000 A
6123544 Cleary Sep 2000 A
6142779 Siegel Nov 2000 A
6152731 Jordon et al. Nov 2000 A
6183248 Chishti et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190165 Andreiko et al. Feb 2001 B1
6217325 Chishti et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217334 Hultgren Apr 2001 B1
6244861 Andreiko et al. Jun 2001 B1
6309215 Phan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6315553 Sachdeva et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322359 Jordan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6350120 Sachdeva et al. Feb 2002 B1
6382975 Poirier May 2002 B1
6398548 Muhammad et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402707 Ernst Jun 2002 B1
6431871 Luthardt Aug 2002 B1
6482298 Bhatnagar Nov 2002 B1
6524101 Phan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6554611 Chishti et al. Apr 2003 B2
6572372 Phan et al. Jun 2003 B1
6629840 Chishti et al. Oct 2003 B2
6705863 Phan et al. Mar 2004 B2
6722880 Chishti et al. Apr 2004 B2
7220124 Taub et al. May 2007 B2
7942671 Taub et al. May 2011 B2
8454364 Taub et al. Jun 2013 B2
8845330 Taub Sep 2014 B2
9427916 Taub et al. Aug 2016 B2
20010002310 Chishti et al. May 2001 A1
20020006597 Andreiko et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013636 O'Brien et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020015934 Rubbert et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020048741 Jordan Apr 2002 A1
20020064759 Durbin May 2002 A1
20020081554 Marshall et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020094503 Chishti et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020102514 Huffman Aug 2002 A1
20020110786 Dillier Aug 2002 A1
20020150859 Imgrund et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020164556 Huffman Nov 2002 A1
20030009252 Pavlovskaia et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030012423 Boland et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030083750 Schulter May 2003 A1
20030118970 Rusin et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030124492 Perot Jul 2003 A1
20030139834 Nikolskiy et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030224311 Cronauer Dec 2003 A1
20040128010 Pavlovskaia et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172150 Perot Sep 2004 A1
20040197740 Amar Oct 2004 A1
20050055118 Nikolskiy et al. Mar 2005 A1
20070154867 Taub et al. Jul 2007 A1
20110183294 Taub et al. Jul 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
3031677 May 1979 AU
517102 Jul 1981 AU
5598894 Jun 1994 AU
1121955 Apr 1982 CA
395385 May 1924 DE
2749802 May 1978 DE
3541891 Jun 1987 DE
29705816 May 1997 DE
69327661 Jul 2000 DE
0091876 Oct 1983 EP
0299490 Jan 1989 EP
0376873 Jul 1990 EP
0490848 Jun 1992 EP
0541500 May 1993 EP
0667753 Aug 1995 EP
0731673 Sep 1996 EP
0774933 May 1997 EP
463897 Jan 1980 ES
2369828 Jun 1978 FR
2652256 Mar 1991 FR
15500777 Aug 1979 GB
53-058191 May 1978 JP
04-028359 Jan 1992 JP
08-508174 Sep 1996 JP
WO 9008512 Aug 1990 WO
WO 9104713 Apr 1991 WO
WO 9410935 May 1994 WO
WO 9703622 Feb 1997 WO
WO 9832394 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9844865 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9852493 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9858596 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9915100 Apr 1999 WO
WO 0008415 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0025677 May 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (155)
Entry
AADR. American Association for Dental Research, Summary of Activities, Mar. 20-23, 1980, Los Angeles, CA, p. 195.
Alcaniz, et al, “An Advanced System for the Simulation and Planning of Orthodontic Treatments,” Karl Heinz Hohne and Ron Kikinis (eds.), Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 4th Intl. Conf., VBC '96, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 22-25, 1996, Springer-Verlag, pp. 511-520.
Alexander et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station Part 2 Clinical Management,” JCO, pp. 402-407 (Jul. 1990).
Altschuler et al., “Analysis of 3-D Data for Comparative 3-D Serial Growth Pattern Studies of Oral-Facial Structures, ” AADR Abstracts, Program and Abstracts of Papers, 57th General Session, IADR Annual Session, Mar. 29, 1979-Apr. 1, 1979, New Orleans Marriot, Journal of Dental Research, vol. 58, Jan. 1979, Special Issue A, p. 221.
Altschuler et al., “Laser Electro-Optic System for Rapid Three-Dimensional (3D) Topographic Mapping of Surfaces,” Optical Engineering, 20(6):953-961 (1981).
Altschuler et al., “Measuring Surfaces Space-Coded by a Laser-Projected Dot Matrix,” SPIE Imaging q Applications for Automated Industrial Inspection and Assembly, vol. 182, p. 187-191 (1979).
Altschuler, “3D Mapping of Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis,” AADR Abstract #607, 2 pages total, (1980).
Andersson et al., “Clinical Results with Titanium Crowns Fabricated with Machine Duplication and Spark Erosion,” Acta. Odontol. Scand., 47:279-286 (1989).
Andrews, The Six Keys to Optimal Occlusion Straight Wire, Chapter 3, pp. 13-24 (1989).
Bartels, et al., An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 422-425 (1987).
Baumrind et al., “A Stereophotogrammetric System for the Detection of Prosthesis Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty, NATO Symposium on Applications of Human Biostereometrics,” Jul. 9-13, 1978, SPIE, vol. 166, pp. 112-123.
Baumrind et al., “Mapping the Skull in 3-D,” reprinted from J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 48(2), 11 pages total, (1972 Fall Issue).
Baumrind, “A System for Craniofacial Mapping Through the Integration of Data from Stereo X-Ray Films and Stereo Photographs,” an invited paper submitted to the 1975 American Society of Photogram Symposium on Close-Range Photogram Systems, University of III., Aug. 26-30, 1975, pp. 142-166.
Baumrind, “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping: Background, Principles, and Perspectives,” Semin. in Orthod., 7(4):223-232 (Dec. 2001).
Begole et al., “A Computer System for the Analysis of Dental Casts,” The Angle Orthod., 51(3):253-259 (Jul. 1981).
Bernard et al.,“Computerized Diagnosis in Orthodontics for Epidemiological Studies: A ProgressReport,” Abstract, J. Dental Res. Special Issue, vol. 67, p. 169, paper presented at International Association for Dental Research 66th General Session, Mar. 9-13, 1988, Montreal, Canada.
Bhatia et al., “A Computer-Aided Design for Orthognathic Surgery,” Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 22:237-253 (1984).
Biggerstaff et al., “Computerized Analysis of Occlusion in the Postcanine Dentition,” Am. J. Orthod., 61(3): 245-254 (Mar. 1972).
Biggerstaff, “Computerized Diagnostic Setups and Simulations,” Angle Orthod., 40(1):28-36 (Jan. 1970).
Biostar Opeation & Training Manual. Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd. 199 Fire Tower Drive,Tonawanda, New York. 14150-5890, 20 pages total (1990).
Blu, et al., “Linear interpolation revitalized”, IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 13(5):710-719 (May 2004).
Bourke, “Coordinate System Transformation,” (Jun. 1996), p. 1, retrieved from the Internet Nov. 5, 2004, URL <http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/—pbourke/prolection/coords>.
Boyd et al., “Three Dimensional Diagnosis and Orthodontic Treatment of Complex Malocclusions With the Invisalipn Appliance,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):274-293 (Dec. 2001).
Brandestini et al., “Computer Machined Ceramic Inlays: In Vitro Marginal Adaptation,” J. Dent. Res. Special Issue, Abstract 305, vol. 64, p. 208 (1985).
Brook et al., “An Image Analysis System for the Determination of Tooth Dimensions from Study Casts: IK Comparison with Manual Measurements of Mesio-distal Diameter,” J. Dent. Res., 65(3):428-431 (Mar. 1986).
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on the Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 1),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(7):442-453 (Jul. 1979).
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on the Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 2),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(8):539-551 (Aug. 1979).
Burstone et al., Precision Adjustment of the Transpalatal Lingual Arch: Computer Arch Form IN Predetermination, Am, Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 79, No. 2 (Feb. 1981), pp. 115-133.
Cardinal Industrial Finishes, Powder Coatings information posted at <http://www.cardinalpaint.com> on Aug. 25, 2000, 2 pages.
Carnaghan, “An Alternative to Holograms for the Portrayal of Human Teeth,” 4th Int'l. Conf. on Holographic Systems, Components and Applications, Sep. 15, 1993, pp. 228-231.
Chaconas et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station, Part 1, Basic Concepts,” JCO, pp. 360-367 (Jun. 1990).
Chafetz et al., “Subsidence of the Femoral Prosthesis, A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 201, pp. 60-67 (Dec. 1985).
Chiappone, (1980). Constructing the Gnathologic Setup and Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 14, pp. 121-133.
Cottingham, (1969). Gnathologic Clear Plastic Positioner, Am. J. Orthod, vol. 55, pp. 23-31.
Crawford, “CAD/CAM in the Dental Office: Does It Work?”, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 121-123 (Feb. 1991).
Crawford, “Computers in Dentistry: Part 1: CAD/CAM: The Computer Moves Chairside,” “Part 2: F. Duret—A Man With A Vision,” “Part 3: The Computer Gives New Vision—Literally,” “Part 4: Bytes 'N Bites” The Computer Moves From the Front Desk to the Operatory, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 54(9), pp. 661-666 (1988).
Crooks, “CAD/CAM Comes to USC,” USC Dentistry, pp. 14-17 (Spring 1990).
Cureton, Correcting Malaligned Mandibular Incisors with Removable Retainers, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 30, No. 7 (1996) pp. 390-395.
Curry et al., “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping at the Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory/University of the Pacific,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):258-265 (Dec. 2001).
Cutting et al., “Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT-Based Models,” Plast. 77(6):877-885 (Jun. 1986).
DCS Dental AG, “The CAD/CAM ‘DCS Titan System’ for Production of Crowns/Bridges,” DSC Production, pp. 1-7 (Jan. 1992.
Definition for gingiva. Dictionary.com p. 1-3. Retrieved from the internet Nov. 5, 2004 <http://reference.com/search/search?q=gingiva>.
Defranco et al., “Three-Dimensional Large Displacement Analysis of Orthodontic Appliances,” J. Biomechanics, 9:793-801 (1976).
Dental Institute University of Zurich Switzerland, Program for International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the CEREC-Method, May 1991, 2 pages total.
Dentrac Corporation, Dentrac document, pp. 4-13 (1992).
Dent-X posted on Sep. 24, 1998 at <http://www.dent-x.com/DentSim.htm>, 6 pages.
Doyle, “Digital Dentistry,” Computer Graphics World, pp. 50-52, 54 (Oct. 2000).
DuraClearTM product information, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab, 1 page (1997).
Duret et al, “CAD-CAM in Dentistry,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 117:715-720 (Nov. 1988).
Duret et al., “CAD/CAM Imaging in Dentistry,” Curr. Opin. Dent., 1:150-154 (1991).
Duret, “The Dental CAD/CAM, General Description of the Project,” Hennson International Product Brochure, 18 pages total, Jan. 1986.
Duret,“Vers Une Prosthese Informatisee,” (English translation attached), Tonus, vol. 75, pp. 55-57 (Nov. 15, 1985).
Economides, “The Microcomputer in the Orthodontic Office,” JCO, pp. 767-772 (Nov. 1979).
Elsasser, Some Observations on the History and Uses of the Kesling Positioner, Am. J. Orthod. (1950) 36:368-374.
English translation of Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 63-11148 to inventor T. Ozukuri (Laid-Open on Jan. 18, 1998) pp. 1-7.
European search report and opinion dated Oct. 1, 2012 for EP Application No. 12159572.2.
Felton et al., “A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(6):478-483 (Dec. 1987).
Friede et al., “Accuracy of Cephalometric Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery,” Abstract of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:754-760 (1987).
Futterling et al., “Automated Finite Element Modeling of a Human Mandible with Dental Implants,” WSCG '98—Conference Program, retrieved from the Internet: <http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/papers98/Strasser 98.pdf>, 8 pages.
Gao et al., “3-D element Generation for Multi-Connected Complex Dental and Mandibular Structure,” Proc. Intl Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, pp. 267-271 (Jun. 12, 2001).
Gim-Alldent Deutschland, “Das DUX System: Die Technik,” 2 pages total (2002).
Gottleib et al., “JCO Interviews Dr. James A. McNamura, Jr., on the Frankel Appliance: Part 2: Clinical 1-1 Management,”J. Clin. Orthod., 16(6):390-407 (Jun. 1982).
Grayson, “New Methods for Three Dimensional Analysis of Craniofacial Deformity, Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxiiofacial Surgery,” AAOMS, 3 pages total, (Sep. 13, 1990).
Guess et al., “Computer Treatment Estimates in Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery,” JCO, pp. 262-28 (Apr. 1989).
Heaven et al., “Computer-Based Image Analysis of Artificial Root Surface Caries, Abstracts of Papers,” J. Dent. Res., 70:528 (Apr. 17-21, 1991).
Highbeam Research, “Simulating Stress Put on Jaw,” Tooling & Production [online], Nov. 1996, n pp. 1-2, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL http://static.highbeam.com/t/toolingampproduction/november011996/simulatingstressputonfa . . . >.
Hikage, “Integrated Orthodontic Management System for Virtual Three-Dimensional Computer Graphic Simulation and Optical Video Image Database for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning”, Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society, Feb. 1987, English translation, pp. 1-38, Japanese version, 46(2), pp. 248-269 (60 pages total).
Hoffmann, et al., “Role of Cephalometry for Planning of Jaw Orthopedics and Jaw Surgery Procedures,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Informatbnen, pp. 375-396 (Mar. 1991).
Hojjatie et al., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glass-Ceramic Dental Crowns,” J. Biomech., 23(11):1157-1166 (1990).
Huckins, “CAD-CAM Generated Mandibular Model Prototype from MRI Data,” AAOMS, p. 96 (1999).
Important Tip About Wearing the Red White & Blue Active Clear Retainer System, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab, 1 page 1998).
JCO Interviews, Craig Andreiko , DDS, on the Elan and Orthos Systems, JCO, pp. 459-468 (Aug. 1994).
JCO Interviews, Dr. Homer W. Phillips on Computers in Orthodontic Practice, Part 2, JCO. 1997; 1983:819-831.
Jerrold, “The Problem, Electronic Data Transmission and the Law,” AJO-DO, pp. 478-479 (Apr. 1988).
Jones et al., “An Assessment of the Fit of a Parabolic Curve to Pre- and Post-Treatment Dental Arches,” Br. J. Orthod., 16:85-93 (1989).
JP Faber et al., “Computerized Interactive Orthodontic Treatment Planning,” Am. J. Orthod., 73(1):36-46 (Jan. 1978).
Kamada et.al., Case Reports on Tooth Positioners Using LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1984) 26(1): 11-29.
Kamada et.al., Construction of Tooth Positioners with LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber and Some Case Reports, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1982) 24(1):1-27.
Kanazawa et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Occlusal Surfaces of Upper Molars in a Dutch Population,” J. Dent Res., 63(11):1298-1301 (Nov. 1984).
Kesling et al., The Philosophy of the Tooth Positioning Appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral surgery. 1945; 31:297-304.
Kesling, Coordinating the Predetermined Pattern and Tooth Positioner with Conventional Treatment, Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg. (1946) 32:285-293.
Kleeman et al., The Speed Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod. (1996) 30:673-680.
Kochanek, “Interpolating Splines with Local Tension, Continuity and Bias Control,” Computer Graphics, ri 18(3):33-41 (Jul. 1984). Oral Surgery (1945) 31 :297-30.
Kunii et al., “Articulation Simulation for an Intelligent Dental Care System,” Displays 15:181-188 (1994).
Kuroda et al., Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Analyzing System Using Laser Scanning, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. (1996) 110:365-369.
Laurendeau, et al., “A Computer-Vision Technique for the Acquisition and Processing of 3-D Profiles of 7 Dental Imprints: An Application in Orthodontics,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 10(3):453-461 (Sep. 1991).
Leinfelder, et al., “A New Method for Generating Ceramic Restorations: a CAD-CAM System,” J. Am. 1-1 Dent. Assoc., 118(6):703-707 (Jun. 1989).
Manetti, et al., “Computer-Aided Cefalometry and New Mechanics in Orthodontics,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Fortschr Kieferorthop. 44, 370-376 (Nr. 5), 1983.
McCann, “Inside the ADA,” J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 118:286-294 (Mar. 1989).
McNamara et al., “Invisible Retainers,” J. Cfin. Orthod., pp. 570-578 (Aug. 1985).
McNamara et al., Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition, Needham Press, pp. 347-353 (Jan. 1993).
Moermann et al., “Computer Machined Adhesive Porcelain Inlays: Margin Adaptation after Fatigue Stress,” IADR Abstract 339, J. Dent. Res., 66(a):763 (1987).
Moles, “Correcting Mild Malalignments—As Easy As One, Two, Three,” AOA/Pro Corner, vol. 11, No. 1, 2 pages (2002).
Mormann et al., “Marginale Adaptation von adhasuven Porzellaninlays in vitro,” Separatdruck aus:Schweiz. Mschr. Zahnmed. 95: 1118-1129, 1985.
Nahoum, “The Vacuum Formed Dental Contour Appliance,” N. Y. State Dent. J., 30(9):385-390 (Nov. 1964).
Nash, “CEREC CAD/CAM Inlays: Aesthetics and Durability in a Single Appointment,” Dent. Today, 9(8):20, 22-23 (Oct. 1990).
Nishiyama et al., “A New Construction of Tooth Repositioner by LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber,” J. Nihon Univ. Sch. Dent., 19(2):93-102 (1977).
Paul et al., “Digital Documentation of Individual Human Jaw and Tooth Forms for Applications in Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and Forensic Medicine” Proc. of the 24th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON '98), Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2415-2418.
Pinkham, “Foolish Concept Propels Technology,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Jan./Feb. 1989.
Pinkham, “Inventor's CAD/CAM May Transform Dentistry,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Sep. 1990.
Ponitz, “Invisible Retainers,” Am. J. Orthod., 59(3):266-272 (Mar. 1971).
PROCERA Research Projects, “PROCERA Research Projects 1993—Abstract Collection,” pp. 3-7; 28 (1993).
Proffit et al., Contemporary Orthodontics, (Second Ed.), Chapter 15, Mosby Inc., pp. 470-533 (Oct. 1993).
Raintree Essix & ARS Materials, Inc., Raintree Essix, Technical Magazine Table of contents and Essix Appliances, <http://www.essix.com/magazine/defaulthtml> Aug. 13, 1997.
Redmond et al., “Clinical Implications of Digital Orthodontics,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 117(2):240-242 (2000).
Rekow et al., “CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Some of the Curious Challenges,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 38(4):314-318 (Apr. 1991).
Rekow et al., “Comparison of Three Data Acquisition Techniques for 3-D Tooth Surface Mapping,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 13(1):344-345 1991.
Rekow, “A Review of the Developments in Dental CAD/CAM Systems,” (contains references to Japanese efforts and content of the papers of particular interest to the clinician are indicated with a one line summary of their content in the bibliography), Curr. Opin. Dent., 2:25-33 (Jun. 1992).
Rekow, “CAD/CAM in Dentistry: A Historical Perspective and View of the Future,” J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 58(4):283, 287-288 (Apr. 1992).
Rekow, “Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Dentistry: A Review of the State of the Art,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 58(4):512-516 (Oct. 1987).
Rekow, “Dental CAD-CAM Systems: What is the State of the Art?”, J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 122:43-48 1991.
Rekow, “Feasibility of an Automated System for Production of Dental Restorations, Ph.D. Thesis,” Univ. of Minnesota, 244 pages total, Nov. 1988.
Richmond et al., “The Development of a 3D Cast Analysis System,” Br. J. Orthod., 13(1):53-54 (Jan. 1986).
Richmond et al., “The Development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Reliability and Validity,” Eur. J. Orthod., 14:125-139 (1992).
Richmond, “Recording the Dental Cast in Three Dimensions,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(3):199-206 (Sep. 1987).
Rudge, “Dental Arch Analysis: Arch Form, A Review of the Literature,” Eur. J. Orthod., 3(4):279-284 1981.
Sakuda et al., “Integrated Information-Processing System in Clinical Orthodontics: An Approach with Use of a Computer Network System,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 101(3): 210-220 (Mar. 1992).
Schellhas et al., “Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Surgical Planning,” Arch. Otolamp!. Head Neck Surg., 114:438-442 (Apr. 1988).
Schroeder et al., Eds. The Visual Toolkit, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey (1998) Chapters 6, 8 & 9, (pp. 153-210,309-354, and 355-428, respectively).
Shilliday, (1971). Minimizing finishing problems with the mini-positioner, Am. J. Orthod. 59:596-599.
Siemens, “CEREC—Computer-Reconstruction,” High Tech in der Zahnmedizin, 14 pages total (2004).
Sinclair, “The Readers' Corner,” J. Clin. Orthod., 26(6):369-372 (Jun. 1992).
Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, CEREC 3D, Manuel utiiisateur, Version 2.0X (in French), 2003,114 pages total.
Stoll et al., “Computer-aided Technologies in Dentistry,” (article summary in English, article in German), Dtsch Zahna'rztl Z 45, pp. 314-322 (1990).
Sturman, “Interactive Keyframe Animation of 3-D Articulated Models,” Proceedings Graphics Interface '84, May-Jun. 1984, pp. 35-40.
The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee HI Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for doctors. http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/doctorhtml>, 5 pages (May 19, 2003).
The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee HJ Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, <http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/patients.html>, 2 pages (May 19, 2003).
The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information, 6 pages (2003).
The Red, White & Blue Way to Improve Your Smile! Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages 1992.
Truax L., “Truax Clasp-Less(TM) Appliance System,” Funct. Orthod., 9(5):22-4, 26-8 (Sep.-Oct. 1992).
Tru-Tain Orthodontic & Dental Supplies, Product Brochure, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, 16 pages total (1996).
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Automated Crown Replication Using Solid Photography SM,” Solid Photography Inc., Melville NY, Oct. 1977, 20 pages total.
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Holodontography: An Introduction to Dental Laser Holography,” School of Aerospace Medicine Brooks AFB Tex, Mar. 1973, 37 pages total.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/050,342, filed Jun. 20, 1997, 41 pages total.
Van Der Linden et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of Dental Casts by Means of the Optocom,” J. Dent. Res., p. 1100 (Jul.-Aug. 1972).
Van Der Linden, “A New Method to Determine Tooth Positions and Dental Arch Dimensions,” J. Dent. Res., 51(4):1104 (Jul.-Aug. 1972).
Van Der Zel, “Ceramic-Fused-to-Metal Restorations with a New CAD/CAM System,” Quintessence Int., 24(11):769-778 (1993).
Varady et al., “Reverse Engineering of Geometric Models—An Introduction,” Computer-Aided Design, 29(4):255-268,1997.
Verstreken et al., “An Image-Guided Planning System for Endosseous Oral Implants,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 17(5):842-852 (Oct. 1998).
Warunek et al., Physical and Mechanical Properties of Elastomers in Orthodonic Positioners, Am J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop, vol. 95, No. 5, (May 1989) pp. 399-400.
Warunek et.al., Clinical Use of Silicone Elastomer Applicances, JCO (1989) XXIII(10):694-700.
Wells, Application of the Positioner Appliance in Orthodontic Treatment, Am. J. Orthodont. (1970) 58:351-366.
Williams, “Dentistry and CAD/CAM: Another French Revolution,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 2-5 (Jan./Mar. 1987).
Williams, “The Switzerland and Minnesota Developments in CAD/CAM,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 50-55 (Apr./Jun. 1987).
Wishan, “New Advances in Personal Computer Applications for Cephalometric Analysis, Growth Prediction, Surgical Treatment Planning and Imaging Processing,” Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxilofacial Surgery Presented on Sep. 13, 1990.
WSCG'98—Conference Program, “The Sixth International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization '98,” Feb. 9-13, 1998, pp. 1-7, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL<http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/wscg98.h>.
Xia et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual-Reality Surgical Planning and Soft-Tissue Prediction for Orthognathic Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 5(2):97-107 (Jun. 2001).
Yamamoto et al., “Optical Measurement of Dental Cast Profile and Application to Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement in Orthodontics,” Front. Med. Biol. Eng., 1(2):119-130 (1988).
Yamamoto et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurement of Dental Cast Profiles and Its Applications to Orthodontics,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 12(5):2051-2053 (1990).
Yamany et al., “A System for Human Jaw Modeling Using Intra-Oral Images,” Proc. of the 20th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Nov. 1, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 563-566.
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); I. The D.P. Concept and Implementation of Transparent Silicone Resin (Orthocon),” Nippon Dental Review, 452:61-74 (Jun. 1980).
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); II. The D.P. Manufacturing Procedure and Clinical Applications,” Nippon Dental Review, 454:107-130 (Aug. 1980).
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); Ill.—The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 2. Skeletal Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 458:112-129 (Dec. 1980).
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); Ill. The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 1, Dental and Functional Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 457:146-164 (Nov. 1980).
You May Be a Candidate for This Invisible No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages (2002).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140336809 A1 Nov 2014 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60422782 Oct 2002 US
60415931 Oct 2002 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 13886159 May 2013 US
Child 14339181 US
Parent 11714857 Mar 2007 US
Child 13886159 US
Parent 10676257 Oct 2003 US
Child 11714857 US