The present invention relates to a method for the production of a tank, especially a cryogenic tank, and to a tank obtained using the method.
The invention relates more particularly to the production of a tank, especially a cryogenic tank, comprising two concentric walls, namely an internal wall and an external wall, defining between them an inter-wall space designed to be subjected to a working pressure, called low pressure, the internal wall being designed to be subjected to a positive internal service pressure, the method comprising:
Cryogenic tanks generally consist of two concentric metal walls separated from each other by an inter-wall space. The inter-wall space under vacuum is designed for thermally insulating the inner tank, which contains the cold cryogenic fluid, from the temperature external to the tank, which is hotter. The working pressure within the inter-wall space is in general of the order of 10−5 mbar.
An insulation called multilayer insulation is in general installed in this inter-wall space so as to optimize the insulation, in particular as regards radiative heat transfer.
On-board liquid hydrogen tanks for automobile applications are of relatively small size (capacities typically between 60 and 200 liters) and have outside diameters that have to be compatible with their automobile integration (for example between 450 and 800 mm).
In general, the service pressure of the internal wall of these cryogenic tanks does not exceed 10 bar. The internal wall is conventionally designed (its thickness) with respect to the construction codes in force (for example PED or ASME) with large safety factors. This means that, for example, the internal wall must be able to withstand internal pressures of the order of four times the service pressure before bursting.
Conventionally, the external wall is designed (its thickness) so as to be able to withstand an internal vacuum (substantially zero internal pressure). This means that the external wall is designed to withstand a force of the buckling type.
The walls are generally made of metal and manufactured using the known principle of rolling for the shells and of deep-drawing for the ends. Of course, such metal walls may be manufactured using any other similar known method, for example by hydroforming.
However, the tanks of this type have a high mass, which is in particular critical for a mass-production application on motor vehicles.
One object of the present invention is to provide a method for the production of a tank that alleviates all or some of the drawbacks of the prior art mentioned above.
For this purpose, the method according to the invention, which moreover meets the generic definition given in the above preamble, is essentially characterized in that the second safety constraint is the pressure withstand capability and the burst strength of the external wall for the intended service pressure for the internal wall and in that the first safety constraint is the burst strength of the internal wall, said first safety constraint being below the second safety constraint.
According to other features:
Another object of the invention is to provide a tank, especially a cryogenic tank.
According to one feature, the tank, especially a cryogenic tank, comprises two concentric walls defining between them an inter-wall space subjected to a pressure called low pressure, the tank being obtained using the method in accordance with any one of the above features.
Moreover, the invention may include one or more of the following features:
Other features and advantages will become apparent on reading the description below, given with reference to the figures in which:
The cryogenic tank 20 shown in
The tank 20 includes a second, external wall 3. The external wall 3 is placed concentrically around the internal wall 1. The two walls 1, 3 define between them an inter-wall space 2 in which a working pressure, called low pressure (for example a pressure of the order of 10−5 mbar) prevails.
Conventionally, the inter-wall space 2 contains means 5 forming a support for the inner tank 1. The inter-wall space 2 also contains insulation means 4, such as a conducting or non-conducting multilayer. For example, the insulation means 4 comprise a multilayer consisting of a combination of aluminized polyethylene terephthalate and glass paper.
Conventionally, the tank 20 also comprises, emerging in the internal wall 1: a filling tube 7; a gas withdrawal tube 6; a level probe 19; and a tube 8 for warming the liquid hydrogen contained in the tank so as to allow the pressure therein to be maintained as gas is being drawn off via the line 6.
The tank 20 is equipped in a known manner with a vacuum pump valve 10 and connected to a first device 11 for protecting the outer tank 3 from any overpressure (for example a valve for discharging to the atmosphere). The vacuum pump valve 10 is also connected to a second device 12 for protecting the outer tank 3 from any overpressure (for example a rupture disk or valve for discharge to the atmosphere). Both protection devices 11, 12 are connected to vents 14 via a venting line.
The Applicant has found, surprisingly and advantageously, that, at least in certain cases, employing usual design rules taken from pressure vessel codes, the calculated thickness of a wall for resistance to a service pressure (for example 10 bar) is smaller than the thickness calculated for the same tank for simple resistance to buckling with a zero internal pressure and a defined external pressure (for example an external pressure of 1 bar).
This is illustrated in more detail in Tables 1 and 2 below.
Table 1 shows a number of calculated thicknesses Eext (in mm) of an external wall 3 for meeting vacuum withstand conditions. The thicknesses were calculated for a number of geometries, namely internal volumes VINT of 50 liters, 100 liters, 150 liters and 200 liters respectively, and outside diameters Dext of 450, 500, 550, 600 and 650 mm, respectively.
This means that for a wall enclosing a volume of 100 liters and having an outside diameter of 550 mm, the minimum thickness to meet the vacuum pressure withstand conditions is 1.51 mm.
Table 2 below shows a number of calculated thicknesses Eext (in mm) for the same external walls in order to meet pressure withstand (burst) conditions according to the CODAP construction code. The calculations were made for a service pressure of 10 bar.
Thus, it may be seen that in certain cases the calculated thickness of a wall for resistance to a service pressure (for example 10 bar) is smaller than the thickness calculated for the same tank for simple resistance to buckling. The critical criteria of the external wall (vacuum or pressure) are given in Table 2a below for each case.
In this table, in all the boxes denoted by “vacuum”, the vacuum design (buckling resistance) gives a greater thickness than the pressure design. Thus, for these cases, the external wall, which must withstand an external pressure of 1 bar, also makes it possible, (by regulation) to withstand an internal pressure of 10 bar. Consequently, no additional thickness is required in respect of these walls so that they also conform to the pressure vessel construction code for the envisioned design pressure in the example of 10 bar.
Starting from this information, the invention proposes that the safety conditions governing double-walled tanks be redefined by proposing that the external wall also be designed as per regulations for withstanding the maximum service pressure of the inner tank (burst resistance) instead of being specifically designed for withstanding buckling.
This means that it is not the internal wall 1 that is considered as defining the “pressure vessel”, but the external wall 3, the internal wall 1 then being considered from the standpoint of its resistance as per the regulations as a “simple accessory”. The withstand characteristics of the internal wall 1 may thus be calculated according to the invention, and not according to the rules dictated by pressure vessel codes, but according to separate rules with lower and less constricting safety factors, without thereby reducing the safety of the final tank 20.
By applying these characteristics, the invention allows thickness savings of the internal tank, and therefore weight savings for double-walled tanks, to be achieved.
Examples of weight saving from the approach described above may be summarized by the following Tables 3 to 9. These Tables 3 to 9 were obtained for the following example: AISI 316L (14404) stainless steel walls according to the CODAP thickness design code, d=7.8 representing the density of the steel in tonnes per cubic meter.
Thus, for an external wall made of stainless steel defined above, having an outside diameter Dext of 600 mm and an internal volume VINT of 200 liters, the weight of the wall calculated to meet the vacuum withstand safety condition is 33.91 kg.
Thus, for an external wall made of stainless steel defined above, having an outside diameter Dext of 600 mm and an internal volume VINT of 200 liters, the weight of the wall calculated to meet the pressure withstand condition (working pressure of 10 bar) is 31.44 kg.
Table 4a shows the maximum values of the stresses in Tables 3 and 4, that is to say the weight of the tank withstanding both vacuum and pressure stresses according to a design code. Thus, the tank of 100 liter volume and 500 mm outside diameter has a weight of 17.51 kg (since in this case the “vacuum” stress is the critical stress, as indicated in Table 2a.
Thus, for an internal wall made of stainless steel defined above, having an outside diameter Dext of 600 mm and an internal volume VINT of 200 liters, the weight of the wall 1 calculated to meet the pressure withstand condition (working pressure of 10 bar) is 28.80 kg.
Because the external wall has dimensions allowing it to meet the pressure (especially burst pressure) safety conditions, the withstand characteristics of the internal wall 1 may thus, according to the invention, be calculated with lower and less constricting safety factors (cf. the example below in Table 6).
In Table 6, the weight of the internal wall was designed to meet pressure withstand conditions with a downgraded rupture coefficient (equal to only twice the surface pressure). By way of comparison, the “normal” rupture coefficient used in Table 5 is around 4 times the service pressure (Pdesign=10 bar in this example).
This means that, for an internal wall 1 made of stainless steel defined above having an outside diameter Dext of 600 mm and an internal volume VINT of 200 liters, the weight of the wall 1 designed to meet the downgraded pressure withstand condition (working pressure of 10 bar) is 17.78 kg.
The weight of the “final” tank (only the two walls are considered) according to the prior art is therefore the sum (in kg) of the design weight of the external wall 3 for withstanding a vacuum and the design weight of the internal wall 1 for withstanding a pressure (sum of the weights given in Tables 3 and 5 and given in Table 7).
Thus, for a tank according to the prior art having an outside diameter Dext of 600 mm and an internal volume VINT of 200 liters, the total weight (internal wall+external wall) is equal to 33.91+28.80=62.71 kg.
In contrast, the “total” weight of the tank obtained by the manufacturing method according to the invention is, in each case, the sum of the design weight of the external wall 3 for withstanding a pressure (Pdesign=10 bar) and for withstanding a vacuum and of the design weight of the internal wall 1 for withstanding a pressure (Pdesign=10 bar) with a reduced or downgraded resistance coefficient (i.e. the sum of the weights in Tables 4a and 6 and given in Table 8).
Thus, for a tank according to the invention having an outside diameter Dext of 600 mm and an internal volume VINT of 200 liters, the total weight (internal wall+external wall) is equal to 33.91+17.78=51.69 kg.
Thus, the tank according to the invention provides a weight saving of around 17.5% over the prior art without reducing the safety factors of said tank (for example by simply comparing the weights indicated in Tables 7 and 8).
Table 9 below illustrates the percentage weight savings obtained for each geometry according to the invention.
This shows that the manufacturing method according to the invention allows weight savings in almost all the configurations. In the cases in which the method according to the invention leads to an increase in weight of the tank (Dext=550, 600 or 650 liters and VINT=50 liters or Dext=650 liters and VINT=100 liters), the method according to the prior art may be preferred. The method according to the invention may also include a step of comparing the design weight of the tank obtained according to the invention with the weight of a tank obtained according to the prior art and a step of manufacturing the tank according to the invention only when the design weight of the tank obtained according to the invention is equal to or less than the weight of a tank obtained according to the prior art.
The invention may apply to any type of tank having two walls and irrespective of the geometry of the tank, having an external length Lext, an outside diameter Dext, an external thickness Eext, an inside diameter DINT, an internal thickness Eint and an internal volume VINT (cf.
The invention applies to tanks in which the internal wall and/or the internal wall consists of any type of stainless steel and/or aluminum grade or of any other material.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0553421 | Nov 2005 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2006/051094 | 10/24/2006 | WO | 00 | 11/10/2008 |