This application is the U.S. National Stage Application of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2017/057458 filed on Mar. 29, 2017, which relates and claims priority to German patent application No. DE 102016105717.7, filed on Mar. 29, 2016, the entire disclosure of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a method for conifying a cylindrical bore using a honing tool, as well as a process chain for shape machining cylindrical bores.
The manufacturers of motor vehicles are faced with the long-term task of continually reducing the fuel consumption of their vehicle fleet equipped with reciprocating piston engines. The friction in reciprocating piston engines between the piston or piston rings, on one hand, and the cylinder bore has a large proportion, up to 35%, of the internal friction loss. Reducing friction in the region of the cylinder bore therefore offers a significant potential for reducing fuel consumption.
An approach to reducing friction between pistons and the cylinder bore is the shape honing developed by the applicant, which is described in detail in EP 2 170 556 B1. In this method, deviations from the geometry of the cylinder caused by tensions during mounting and/or thermal expansion of the cylinder bore are equalized in that complementary raised points or recesses are formed during the shape honing. This method is very effective and is successfully used during the manufacturing of different reciprocating piston engines.
A honing method is known from DE 10 2013 204 714 A1, via which the cylinder bore of a combustion engine obtains a bottle shape. A shape described as a bottle form is one, in which the cylinder bore has two sections that have a different diameter. The section having the smaller diameter is provided in the region of the cylinder head while the section having the larger diameter is provided in the region of the crankshaft. A conical transition region is formed between these regions that takes up approximately 5% to 20% of the bore length.
A method is known from U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,685 for honing a cylindrical bore in which during the honing process the diameter of the bore being machined measures at the upper reversal point ZU and at the lower reversal point ZL of the honing spindle and in the middle ZL between these reversal points. Then the diameter DM in the middle between the reversal points is compared to the diameters DU and DL in the reversal points. Depending on the differences DM-DU and DM-DL, the upper reversal point ZU and the lower reversal point ZL of the honing spindle are changed, thereby improving the cylindricity of the bore.
The invention is based on the object of preparing a honing method that permits the economical and reproducible manufacture of cylinder bores, wherein the friction between the piston rings and especially between the piston skirt and the cylinder bore is minimized and, as a consequence, the emissions behaviour and the fuel consumption of the combustion vehicle equipped with such cylinders is optimized. The invention is also based on the object of providing a honing machine designed and equipped for this.
The method is intended to allow for the use of a wide variety of geometries of the cylinder bore specified by the user in series production in a precise and process stable manner. In this method, the geometries specified by the user, for example a cone, a bottle shape or a contour line that can be defined by a polynomial of the nth order, can be the “cylinder bore” of a combustion vehicle.
This object is achieved according to the invention by a method for conifying a cylindrical bore or parts of a cylindrical bore.
In the method, a honing tool is used that has measuring devices which allow the varying diameters D (y) of the cylinder bore along the length of the cylinder bore to be detected during the machining. Air-measurement nozzles are suitable as measuring devices. In general, honing bars have a length that is shorter than one third of the length of the bore to be machined. The smaller the honing bar length, the shorter the wavelength of the target shape can be, because, as bar length increases, the wavelengths of the target shapes which are smaller than the honing bar length get mechanically filtered out. The measuring devices are generally arranged between the honing bars so that the bore measurement can be detected there, where the material removal takes place.
The method according to the invention has a closed control circuit, as a result, causes the different diameters D across the length of the bore to be machined to be measured during the machining by means of a permanent measuring (=permanent detection) and gradually reduced diameter corresponding to the measured actual values of the diameter of the stroke of the honing tool so that only the regions of the bore are machined in which the actual diameter of the bore is still smaller than the target diameter. In the region or regions of the bore in which the actual diameter of the bore is equal to the target diameter specified there, no further machining of the bore takes place. “Permanent measuring” means that the diameter of the bore is detected during the honing process continuously as well as with a high temporal and spatial resolution. In this manner, the current shape of the bore being machined is already available in real time for regulation of the honing process during the honing process.
Because of the permanent measuring, a continuous comparison takes place between the actual shape and the target shape and a permanent stroke displacement takes place with the smallest variations in travel, so that a continuous, stepless shape is produced. The smallest-possible amounts of stroke dislocation are essentially only specified by the resolution of the position measuring system.
By regulation of the diameter D(y) of the bore, a variety of non-cylindrical contour lines can be produced simply, process stable and with the highest reproducibility. One reason for the high achievable precision is that effects such as wear and tear on the cutting faces of the honing bars or changes in the contact pressure force and the like have have no influence on the result of the honing process according to the invention because the control circuit according to the invention eliminates these influencing variables. The control variable of the control circuit according to the invention is the stroke OP-UP of the honing tool. The stroke of the honing tool is limited by an upper reversal point OP and by a lower reversal point UP.
The method according to the invention comprises the steps explained in more detail in conjunction with
In an additional advantageous embodiment of the invention, it is provided that—based on a stroke Hn—the stroke of the honing tool is reduced to a stroke Hn+1 if the actual diameter of the bore for at least one reversal point OPn, UPn of the honing tool is equal to the target diameter in one of these reversal points and that the honing bars of the honing tool, after the stroke Hn has been reduced to Hn+1, the point or the region of the bore in the previous reversal points OPn, UPn is no longer machined. In this manner, it is ensured that only the region or regions of the bore in which the actual diameter DIST (y) is still smaller than the target diameter DSOLL (y) desired there are machined further.
The reduction of the stroke can be accomplished in different ways. An alternative that can be very easily realized in terms of control technology provides that the stroke Hn is always reduced by a specified amount DeltaH in order to arrive at a reduced stroke Hn+1. The amount of DeltaH is generally selected as a function of the total length of the bore to be honed. The desired contour line can also have an influence on the amount of DeltaH.
The stroke Hn+1 is further reduced if at a further reversal point OPn+1, UPn+1 the actual diameter DIst(n+1) of the bore section honed last is equal to the target diameter Dsoll UPn+1 of the bore at this reversal point OPn+1, UPn+1.
Alternatively to this reduction of the stroke by a constant amount, it is also possible that, based on the current actual diameter of the bore or the honing bars, a diameter amount DeltaX is always added to the actual diameter and the cutting point of the contour line of the desired bore is formed having this diameter DIst+DeltaX any time the stroke is to be reduced. The cutting site then forms the new reversal point OP, UP of the honing tool.
This alternative is explained in detail below in conjunction with the figures (see
At the beginning of the honing process according to the invention, the bore is generally machined along the entire length so that the method according to the invention proceeds from a cylindrical bore.
The desired target shape or contour line of the bore to be machined can be given as a mathematical function, e.g. as a polynomial of the nth order as a function of the Y-axis (longitudinal axis of the bore). Alternatively, it is also possible to specify the diameter in a table of values. The corresponding diameters for different points of the bore along the Y-axis are entered into this table of values. Intermediate values between these reference points can be formed by interpolation (linearly or progressively).
In order to achieve as uniform a honing pattern as possible, it can be advantageous to increase the speed of the honing spindle as the stroke decreases. The cutting characteristics and the abrasive performance for the honing bars then remain unchanged in the first approach. It is also possible to increase the contact pressure with which the honing bars are pressed against the bore instead of the speed in order to achieve an unaltered removal. A combination of the two measures is also possible.
The same advantages are achieved by the use of the honing machine according to the invention.
Additional advantages and advantageous embodiments can be derived from the drawings to follow, their description and the claims. All features identified in the drawings, their description and the claims can be significant for the invention both alone or in any combination.
Shown are:
It is the object of the method according to the invention to produce a bore that is primarily conical. In the example illustrated in
It has been found, surprisingly, that by using the method according to the invention, conified or other non-cylindrical bores can be produced in the shortest time process stable and with high precision. A variety of contour lines can thus be specified.
Exemplary different bore shapes or contour lines are illustrated in
The largest diameter DMax is found on the lower end of the bore in the exemplary embodiments having numbers 1 to 4. The example having the number 5 illustrates that even rotationally symmetrical bores whose largest diameter is located neither on the upper nor the lower end can also be produced. The largest diameter DMAX in this example is located between the upper and the lower end of the bore.
In
The contour line of the bore is provided with reference character 1. In a non-cylindrical bore, target diameter DSOLL is a function of the longitudinal axis Y (DSOLL=f(y)).
In the exemplary embodiment represented in
The starting point of the method according to the invention is a cylinder block in which the bore has been pre-machined so that it has a cylindrical shape with diameter DIst,0. In this state, the machining according to the method of the invention begins by a honing tool having a honing bar (not shown) being inserted into the bore with diameter DIst, 0. The bore is honed along the entire length of the bore. The reversal points of the honing tool or its honing bars are designated with OP1 and UP1 (see
By means of the honing process, diameter DIST of the bore is enlarged uniformly over its entire length starting from DIst,0 until the still-cylindrical bore has the diameter DIst,1.
It is evident from
As soon as the diameter of bore DIst is equal to target diameter DSoll, 1 in region b, the method according to the invention provides that the stroke of the honing tool is reduced in such a manner that region b is not machined further.
This is achieved in this dislocated by upper reversal point OP (see
During the honing process with reversal points OP2 and UP (see
As soon as actual diameter DIst of the bore in the region between OP2 and UP is equal to the target value at the upper reversal point OP2, the stroke is further reduced (not shown in
The differences between diameters DSoll, 1, DSoll, 2 and DSoll, 3 and the corresponding actual diameters D1, D2 and D3 are only a few thousandths of a millimeter. Because of the permanent measuring, a permanent stroke displacement also takes place with the smallest variations in travel, so that a continuous, stepless shape is produced. The respective variation in travel is only limited by the resolution of the position sensor for the stroke movement that is substantially smaller than the local slope of the desired shape. During the subsequent smooth-honing that takes place along the entire length of the bore, the previously prepared shape is machined to the desired final roughness profile. The “steps” in
A first variant of the reduction of the stroke according to this invention is illustrated using
The honing tool or the honing bars 5 belonging to the honing tool are shown very schematically once at the upper reversal point OP and once at the lower reversal point UP. The stroke of the honing bars corresponds to the spacing of OP1 and UP if the bore is honed along its entire length.
An air-measurement nozzle that belongs to the honing tool is provided with the reference character 7 in
The amount of DeltaH can be specified by the operator of the honing machine as a parameter in the control system.
Because the bore in region b, where reversal point OP1 is located, already has desired target diameter DSoll (1), upper reversal point OP2 is dislocated downward in the direction of lower reversal point UP. New reversal point OP2 is obtained by the displacement of previous upper reversal point OP1 by the amount DeltaH in the direction of lower reversal point UP.
A second target diameter DSoll,2 is associated with a new second reversal point OP2. Second target diameter DSoll,2 is equal to the target diameter of the bore at reversal point OP2.
New diameter DSoll, 2 at reversal point OP2 can also be determined based on diameter DSoll (1) using the formula DSoll,2=DSoll, 1+DeltaX.
The amount of DeltaX is not constant, but depends upon the slope of the contour line at upper reversal point OP1 and new upper reversal point OP2. Because the contour line of the bore is stored in the machine controls—for example, as a polynomial or a table of values—the corresponding target diameter at the reversal point can be determined for each reversal point OP, UP.
The strokes of the honing tool over the time t are plotted in the right-hand part of
The variant “default constant DeltaX for the determination of DeltaH” is represented in
It is clear that the reduction of the stroke can be implemented not only in the region of the upper reversal OP point, but also in the region of lower reversal point UP.
For reasons of clarity, such an exemplary embodiment is not shown. Reference is made to
The crosshatched surfaces 91, 92 and 93 illustrate where material must still be removed in order to achieve desired contour line 1.
All figures are schematic illustrations and are not to scale.
In the method variants described so far, it was assumed that the wall of the (cylinder) bore to be machined is so thick that the forces acting in the radial direction on the wall during the honing process by the honing bars effect no or only small deformations on the wall. The radial force (contact pressure force) with which the honing bars are pressed against the cylinder bore are caused by the feeding device or the control of the honing machine of the.
This principle functions for quasi-fixed workpiece structures or workpieces whose wall thickness is constant. These conditions are not always present in practice for modern cylinder crankcases, so that elastic deformations due to machining forces arise because of locally varying wall thicknesses and/or high feeding forces during the machining and the removed material shifts away in the radial direction (radial widening). Because the widening is elastic, the wall “springs” back as soon as the honing process is completed. In this manner, the achieved actual shape in the tensioned state deviates strongly from the target shape. This circumstance is illustrated in
If the bore is now widened radially in thin-walled section 34 during the honing process and the desired target shape is produced corresponding to line 36 according to the method of the invention, the bore then springs radially back after the end of the honing process and results in an actual shape according to line 38 in
It is clear from a comparison of lines 36 and 38 that the actual shape and the target shape in thin-walled section 34 vary significantly from each other.
A solution according to the invention for this problem is that the target shape 36 becomes, at least locally, a corrected target shape.
The corrected target shape is the shape that the cylinder bore must assume during the honing process in order for it to have the desired target shape 36 after the end of the honing process and without radial widening.
The corrected target shape is obtained by the radial widening being added to target shape 36 (particularly in the region of thin-walled section 34). The corrected target shape in
If the cylinder bore is now brought into corrected target shape 42 via the method according to the invention, the deviations between actual shape 38 and target shape 36 of the cylinder bore after the end of the honing process are minimal. This circumstance is illustrated in
In other words: Corrected target shape 42 offsets these local different deformations by additional local material removal. In this manner, it is possible to keep the diameter of the non-cylindric rotationally symmetric cylinder bore within a very narrow tolerance zone between lines 44 along the entire length of the cylinder bore.
Corrected target shape 42 can be determined empirically or by calculation. In the case of an empirical determination, it is possible to iteratively change from the target shape to the corrected target shape based on the particular results achieved by correcting the target shape in small steps (for example in the range of one more micrometers) at a plurality of support points until the actual shape (see 38 in
In the case of a calculated determination, the radial widening (Ar) of the cylinder bore in thin-walled region 34 can be at least roughly determined based on the force with which the honing bars are pressed against the cylinder wall and this widening can be added to target shape 36. Starting from the target shape, the respective results achieved can be iteratively changed to the corrected target shape if the target shape is corrected in small steps at a plurality of support points (for example in the region of one or a plurality of micrometers) until the actual shape (see 38 in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 105 717.7 | Mar 2016 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/057458 | 3/29/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/167829 | 10/5/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4455789 | Gehring | Jun 1984 | A |
4504917 | Grimm | Mar 1985 | A |
4945685 | Kajitani et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5193314 | Wormley | Mar 1993 | A |
20030120374 | Klink | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050130560 | Klink et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070298685 | Cloutier | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20110223833 | Rauscher | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120184182 | Mayer | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20160303702 | Xavier et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170129070 | Flores | May 2017 | A1 |
20170304978 | Nonaka | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102011076213 | Mar 2012 | DE |
1020130204714 | Oct 2014 | DE |
20150203051 | Aug 2016 | DE |
1020150209609 | Dec 2016 | DE |
864078755 | Mar 1989 | JP |
H09047957 | Feb 1997 | JP |
2007015036 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2008023596 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2016516595 | Jun 2016 | JP |
2014146919 | Sep 2014 | WO |
20140146919 | Sep 2014 | WO |
20160131735 | Aug 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion Form PCT/ISA/210 and PCT/ISA/237, International Application No. PCT/EP2017/057458, pp. 1-10, International Filing Date Mar. 29, 2017, mailing date of search report Jun. 14, 2017. |
German Office Action 1102016105717.7, pp. 1-5, created on Feb. 15, 2017. |
Written Opinion Form PCT/IPEA/408, Application PCT/EP2017/057458, pp. 1-8, International Filing Date Mar. 29, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Form PCT/IPEA/416, Application PCT/EP2017/057458, pp. 1-56, dated Aug. 15, 2018. |
Japanese Patent Office Communication, pp. 1-6. |
Japanese Patent Office Communication, pp. 1-4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190111540 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |