The present invention concerns a metal closure having a sidewall and separate disc, which forms the top plate of the closure.
A closure comprising a plastic sidewall and a metal disc is well known and a closure of this type is commonly referred to as a “combo closure”. Conventionally, the sidewall or “ring” is made from a plastic material by injection moulding. This plastic ring defines threads, which cooperate with similar threads on a container neck. A tamper evident band is defined at the free end of the “ring” and joined thereto by frangible bridges. The frangible bridges are designed to break upon opening of the closure, to indicate to a user of the closure/container package that the closure has been opened previously. Sealing compound is conventionally applied to the metal disc to form a seal between the metal disc and the mouth of the container.
relates to such a closure. An advantage of this type of closure is that the tamper evident band breaks before the seal between the metal disc and the container is broken, giving a user confidence that the contents within the container has not been subject to tampering.
The 2-piece closure design allows the breaking of the container seal to be controlled. The initial twisting of the closure “ring” activates the tamper-evident feature, such as breaking a tamper-evident band, whilst the disc remains sealed to the container. Thereafter, a further feature may be provided on the closure “ring” to prise the disc from the container, thereby breaking the seal between the disc and the container to equalise any difference between the internal pressure in the container and the external environment. This 2-stage opening reduces the torque required to open the closure and allows the closure to be removed more easily.
Disadvantages of the arrangement described in
are that the combination of metal and plastic material makes the closure more difficult to recycle. Also, the recent increase in plastic raw material costs makes the closure relatively expensive to manufacture and the plastic “ring” prevents the use of the closure on packages, which are subjected to a retort process.
Combo closures having a metal ring confining a glass top plate (or disc) are well known in the prior art and are used for home preserving. However, these closures are also made from two materials (metal and glass), which must be recycled separately.
describes a “combo” closure comprising a disc and a ring shaped element. A “special feature” is described, which reduces the torque required to unscrew the closure from a container. The closure described in this document utilises a separate, annular gasket, which enhances the seal between the closure and the container to which the closure is affixed.
If an all-metal equivalent of the known “combo closure” were provided, this would allow a user to gain the benefit of reduced opening torques, whilst a package incorporating the closure may pass through a retort process as currently used for one-piece metal twist closures. Such an all-metal “combo” closure would be easier to recycle as it is substantially composed of only one material. Furthermore, if the closure were manufactured from a conventional metal, twist closure shell, existing capping equipment may be used to apply the closure to the container.
The cost of manufacturing such an all-metal closure requires efficient use of metal raw material to reduce wastage. A problem arising from manufacture of a metal version of a “combo” closure comprising a metal ring and a metal disc is that if both these meal components are produced from separate pieces of material, the amount of wastage is significant. Alternatively, if a “disc” is simply cut from the top plate of a conventional metal closure blank, this disc will not be constrained by the remaining “ring”. This is because the “disc” will be able to pass through the resulting hole in the “ring” will be too large to constrain the aforementioned disc.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of manufacture for a metal closure having separate disc and a circumferential ring, including the steps of
The closure according to the invention is made predominantly from metal (except for a small quantity of sealing compound), which improves a user's ability to recycle the closure after it is no longer needed. Lugs may be provided at the edge of the ring opposite the disc according to conventional processes.
Preferably, a curl is formed at the free edge of the closure blank prior to separation of the sidewall (ring) from the top plate (disc). A curl protects the cut edge of the closure blank, preventing injury etc. and provides rigidity to the ring upon separation of the sidewall from the top plate.
The sidewall of the closure blank is cut adjacent to the top plate, to provide a ring and a separate disc. The closure blank may be cut using any conventional process e.g. laser cutting. The disc thus produced, will have the same diameter as the ring. Therefore, the cut edge of the disc is hemmed or curled to reduce its outside diameter and thereby allow it to be inserted into the ring.
Alternatively, the sidewall of the closure blank may be separated from the top plate by the known process of “clip trimming”. This process requires that the top of the sidewall (adjacent to the top plate) is first drawn to a smaller diameter by a first punch and die and then severed by a second punch part having a sharp corner and a diameter between that of the die and the first punch part. This technique is most commonly used for trimming metal container bodies or for trimming thin aluminium Roll On Pilfer Proof (ROPP) closures. The advantage of this technique is that the diameter of the disc is reduced and the subsequent hemming of the disc is not required.
In one embodiment of the invention, the disc is supported in the ring so that the cut edges of both the ring and the disc are proximate one another and then the cut edges of the ring and the disc are loosely curled together. This embodiment has the advantage that the ring requires no retention features because the loose curl loosely retains the disc within the ring, whilst allowing the disc both axial and rotational movement.
Finally, in another embodiment of the invention, an alternative blank configuration is proposed which allows the disc and the rink to be loosely curled together as discussed above, but in this embodiment the external surface of the blank may be printed or treated before separating into a disc and ring. The disc and ring may then be assembled as described above, but in this embodiment, both the external surface of the disc and the ring is already printed or treated.
Tamper evidence may be provided on the 2-piece metal closure by taking advantage of the fact that the ring and the disc are independent and move separately upon initial opening of the closure. Thus initially, when the ring is twisted by a defined amount, the disc remains sealed to the container and does not move. A frangible bridge or label may be secured to the disc and the ring and upon an attempt to remove the closure, the relative movement of the ring relative to the disc breaks the frangible bridge or label, giving a visual indication that an attempt has been made to remove the closure from the container.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
All same or similar components in the figures have been labelled using the same or similar reference numerals respectively.
Referring to
The free-edge of the sidewall 20 is formed into a closure curl 25, making a one-piece metal closure shell 1. The closure shell 1 may be cut at line A-A (see
Referring to
The flattened curl of the modified closure shown in
Referring to
In another embodiment, after cutting from the disc, the cut edge of the ring 20′ is provided with a ring curl 28, to protect the cut edge of the ring 20′ (as shown in
The closure shown in
A modification to the closure blank provided in
Referring to
As illustrated in
The embodiment illustrated in
Preferably, in any of the embodiments of the invention described above, sealant 50 is applied in the groove 12 of the disc 10′, prior to assembly of the disc 10′ in the ring 20′. This eases manufacture, because the disc 10′ is easier to control and handle when separate than when assembled in the ring 20′.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06123299 | Oct 2006 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/061744 | 10/31/2007 | WO | 00 | 4/30/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/053014 | 5/8/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
470529 | Williams | Mar 1892 | A |
1349837 | Johnson | Aug 1920 | A |
1699069 | Huntar | Jan 1929 | A |
1856941 | Anderson | May 1932 | A |
2139682 | Hothersall | Dec 1938 | A |
2166923 | Woodcock | Jul 1939 | A |
2216082 | Kronquest et al. | Sep 1940 | A |
2522301 | Rooney | Sep 1950 | A |
2527885 | Krueger | Oct 1950 | A |
2621622 | Henchert | Dec 1952 | A |
2702597 | Wickwire et al. | Feb 1955 | A |
2975740 | Smith et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
2991602 | Van De Kerke et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
D192757 | Foss et al. | May 1962 | S |
3068344 | Keinanen et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3124872 | Knodel | Mar 1964 | A |
3157080 | Hanni | Nov 1964 | A |
3186003 | Gregory, Jr. et al. | May 1965 | A |
3380419 | Moloney | Apr 1968 | A |
3446381 | Podesta | May 1969 | A |
3581691 | Ringler | Jun 1971 | A |
3802362 | Daniel et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3802363 | Langewis | Apr 1974 | A |
3813972 | Van Alsburg | Jun 1974 | A |
3836033 | Podesta | Sep 1974 | A |
3875833 | Kannegiesser et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
RE28872 | Larkin et al. | Jun 1976 | E |
D240595 | Kress | Jul 1976 | S |
4003324 | Tate et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4004478 | Morgan | Jan 1977 | A |
D244065 | Daenen | Apr 1977 | S |
4022141 | Bartenstein | May 1977 | A |
4030432 | Miller et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4087018 | Tebbutt | May 1978 | A |
4090004 | Tebbutt et al. | May 1978 | A |
4111330 | Jordan | Sep 1978 | A |
4171063 | Cloutier | Oct 1979 | A |
RE30746 | Stroobants et al. | Sep 1981 | E |
4299147 | Rogers | Nov 1981 | A |
D266906 | Guerette | Nov 1982 | S |
4473163 | Geiger | Sep 1984 | A |
4487539 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4557167 | Cvacho | Dec 1985 | A |
4671148 | Thatcher | Jun 1987 | A |
4762579 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4808053 | Nagai et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4914990 | Hellweg et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4942777 | Fife | Jul 1990 | A |
5014491 | Tsukada et al. | May 1991 | A |
5078564 | Zago | Jan 1992 | A |
5146818 | Hellweg | Sep 1992 | A |
5287713 | Mine et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5325696 | Jentzsch et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5564321 | Rath | Oct 1996 | A |
5694822 | Maidment | Dec 1997 | A |
5782599 | Moran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785198 | Credle, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5839869 | Moran et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
D480304 | Stodd | Oct 2003 | S |
6662958 | German et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
D489005 | Miceli et al. | Apr 2004 | S |
6748835 | Dickey | Jun 2004 | B2 |
D522364 | Hicks et al. | Jun 2006 | S |
D526740 | Xu | Aug 2006 | S |
D536975 | Smith et al. | Feb 2007 | S |
7250352 | Mizutani et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7387474 | Edler et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7461576 | Dickey | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7506529 | Bauer et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7526938 | Dunwoody et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
D612196 | Furlong | Mar 2010 | S |
7731048 | Alvares et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7832249 | Schumann et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
D628894 | Pontes | Dec 2010 | S |
D645741 | Dunwoody | Sep 2011 | S |
D647799 | Dunwoody | Nov 2011 | S |
D650275 | Dunwoody | Dec 2011 | S |
D650669 | Dunwoody | Dec 2011 | S |
D650670 | Dunwoody | Dec 2011 | S |
D651081 | Dunwoody | Dec 2011 | S |
D651082 | Dunwoody | Dec 2011 | S |
D652297 | Dunwoody | Jan 2012 | S |
8091455 | McKeeth et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8393192 | McEldowney et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20040016758 | Richardson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20070090111 | Alvares et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20110011866 | Dunwoody | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110036134 | Dunwoody | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2933547 | Mar 1981 | DE |
3619322 | Dec 1986 | DE |
0092884 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0599549 | Jun 1994 | EP |
1686070 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1918041 | May 2008 | EP |
620920 | May 1927 | FR |
769264 | Aug 1934 | FR |
2177118 | Nov 1973 | FR |
WO 9511104 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 2005063587 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2008053014 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2009060291 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009115377 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009130122 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/922,989, filed Feb. 12, 2009, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/988,933, filed Apr. 6, 2009, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,421, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,422, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,424, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,437, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,441, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,443, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,446, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,448, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,449, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,732, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Ramsey. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,735, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Dunwoody. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,738, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Dunwoody. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,739, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Dunwoody. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,744, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Dunwoody. |
Dunwoody et al., U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,449, “Closure Cap”, filed May 11, 2010, 11 pages. |
Ramsey, U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,732, “Closure Cap”, filed Jan. 6, 2011, 12 pages. |
Ramsey, U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,735, “Closure Cap”, filed Jan. 6, 2011, 4 pages. |
Ramsey, U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,738, “Closure Cap”, filed Jan. 6, 2011, 5 pages. |
Ramsey, U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,739, “Closure Cap”, filed Jan. 6, 2011, 4 pages. |
Ramsey, U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,744, “Closure Cap”, filed Jan. 6, 2011, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100003109 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |