Patent Grant
10367863
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates in general to advanced voice services in wireless communications networks, and more specifically, to a system and method for providing dynamic quality-of-service (QoS) for Push-to-Talk (PTT) services.
2. Description of Related Art
Advanced voice services (AVS), also known as Advanced Group Services (AGS), such as two-way half-duplex voice calls within a group, also known as Push-to-talk-over-Cellular (PoC), Push-to-Talk (PTT), or Press-to-Talk (P2T), as well as other AVS functions, such as Push-to-Conference (P2C) or Instant Conferencing (IC), Push-to-Message (P2M), etc., are described in the co-pending and commonly-assigned patent applications cross-referenced above and incorporated by reference herein. These AVS functions have enormous revenue earnings potential for wireless communications systems, such as cellular networks, wireless data networks and IP networks.
One approach to AVS is based on packet or voice-over-IP (VoIP) technologies. This approach capitalizes on the “bursty” nature of PoC/PTT conversations and makes network resources available only during talk bursts and hence is highly efficient from the point of view of network and spectral resources. This approach promises compliance with newer and emerging packet-based standards, such as GPRS (General Packet Radio Service), UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System), 3G/4G/LTE (3rd Generation/4th Generation/Long Term Evolution), etc.
Nonetheless, there is a need in the art for improvements to the methods and systems for delivering the advanced voice services, such as PoC/PTT, that comply with both existing and emerging wireless standards and yet provide superior user experiences. For example, many existing implementations of PoC/PTT do not support the use of QoS settings in order to prioritize network resources. The present invention, on the other hand, satisfies the need for dynamic QoS for PTT services.
To overcome the limitations in the prior art described above, and to overcome other limitations that will become apparent upon reading and understanding the present specification, the present invention discloses a system and method for providing dynamic QoS for PTT services in a wireless communications network.
One or more servers interface to the wireless communications network to perform advanced voice services for one or more mobile units therein, wherein the advanced voice services include an instant two-way half-duplex voice call within a group of the mobile units comprising a PTT call session. Both the servers and the mobile units that use the advanced group services communicate with each other using control messages transmitted across bearers in the wireless communications network, and at least one of the servers transmits media streams comprised of voice messages for the advanced group services between the mobile units across the bearers in the wireless communications network. One of the servers manages the PTT call sessions by acting as an arbitrator for the PTT call session and by controlling the sending of the control messages and the media streams for the PTT call session.
At least one of the servers sets up a dedicated bearer in the wireless communications network for at least one of the mobile units, wherein the dedicated bearer has a specified quality of service (QoS) for transmission of at least the media streams to the mobile unit. The dedicated bearer may be a static dedicated bearer that is subscription-based and is established on a default bearer for the mobile unit. Alternatively, the dedicated bearer may be a dynamic dedicated bearer, wherein the dynamic dedicated bearer is a pre-established dynamic dedicated bearer that is setup prior to the PTT call session or the dynamic dedicated bearer is setup when the PTT call session is setup. In the latter situation, the dynamic dedicated bearer may be setup in parallel with the setup of the PTT call session, wherein the PTT call session is setup on a default bearer, and the media streams are transmitted on the default bearer until the dynamic dedicated bearer is setup. In either situation, the dynamic dedicated bearer is torn down when the PTT call session is ended.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
In the following description of the preferred embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration the specific embodiment in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized as structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The present invention discloses a system for implementing advanced voice services in wireless communications networks that provides a feature-rich server architecture with a flexible client strategy. This system is an Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) standards-compliant solution that can be easily deployed, thereby enabling carriers to increase their profits, improve customer retention and attract new customers without costly upgrades to their network infrastructure. This system is built on a proven, reliable all-IP (Internet Protocol) platform. The highly scalable platform is designed to allow simple network planning and growth. Multiple servers can be distributed across operator networks for broad geographic coverage and scalability to serve a large and expanding subscriber base.
The following table defines various acronyms, including industry-standard acronyms, that are used in this specification.
The following table defines various terms, including industry-standard terms, that are used in this specification.
Preferably, the system 100 includes one or more PoC Service Layers 102 and one or more Management Layers 104, each of which is comprised of one or more servers interconnected by one or more IP networks 106. Specifically, the PoC Service Layer 102 includes one or more XML Document Management (XDM) Servers 108, Presence Servers 110, PoC Servers 112, and Media Servers 114, while the Management Layer 104 includes one or more Element Management System (EMS) Servers 116, Lawful Intercept (LI) Servers 118, Web Customer Service Representative (WCSR) Servers 120, and Web Group Provisioning (WGP) Servers 122. These various servers are described in more detail below.
The PoC Service Layer 102 and Management Layer 104 are connected to one or more wireless communications networks, such as cellular phone networks 124 and wireless data networks 126, as well as one or more IP networks 106. Note that the cellular phone networks 124 and wireless data networks 126 may be implemented in a single network or as separate networks. The cellular phone network 124 includes one or more Short Message Service Centers (SMSCs) 128, Mobile Switching Centers (MSCs) 130, and Base Station Components (BSCs) 132, wherein the BSCs 132 include controllers and transceivers that communicate with one or more customer handsets 134 executing a PoC Client 136. A handset 134 is also referred to as a mobile unit, mobile station, mobile phone, cellular phone, etc. and may comprise any wireless and/or wired device. The wireless data network 126, depending on its type, e.g., GPRS or 4G/LTE, includes one or more Gateway GPRS Support Nodes (GGSNs) or Packet Gateways (PGWs) 138 and Serving GPRS Support Nodes (SGSNs) or Serving GateWays (SGWs) 140, which also communicate with customer handsets 134 via BSCs or eNodeBs 132.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the PoC Service Layer 102 and Management Layer 104 are connected to one or more Gateways 142, which are coupled to one or more external IP networks 144, in order to communicate with one or more PoC Clients 136 on one or more handsets 134. Traffic to and from the wireless data networks 126 may also traverse Gateways 142.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the handsets 134 may be WiFi-enabled and thus capable of communicating with local IP networks 144, which may be comprised of one or more WiFi Access Points (APs) 146, as well as other network 144 appliances such as Firewalls 148.
The PoC Service Layer 102 interacts with the SMSC 128 on the cellular phone network 124 to handle Short Message Service (SMS) operations, such as routing, forwarding and storing incoming text messages on their way to desired endpoints.
The PoC Service Layer 102 also interacts with the following entities on the wireless data network 126:
The PoC Service Layer 102 also interacts with the following entities on the IP network 144:
As noted above, the PoC Service Layer 102 is comprised of the following elements:
These elements are described in more detail below.
The PoC Server 112 handles the PoC/PTT call session management and is the core for managing the PoC/PTT services for the PoC Clients 136 using SIP protocol. The PoC Server 112 implements a Control Plane portion of Controlling and Participating PoC Functions. A Controlling PoC Function acts as an arbitrator for a call session and controls the sending of control and bearer traffic by the PoC Clients 136. A Participating PoC Function relays control and bearer traffic between the PoC Client 136 and the PoC Server 112 performing the Controlling PoC Function.
The Media Server 114 implements a User Plane portion of the Controlling and Participating PoC Functions. The Media Server 114 supports the Controlling PoC Function by duplicating voice packets received from an originator PoC Client 136 to all recipients of the PoC Session. The Media Server 114 also supports the Participating PoC Function by relaying the voice packets between PoC Clients 136 and the Media Server 114 supporting the Controlling PoC Function. The Media Server 114 also handles packets sent to and received from the PoC Clients 136 for floor control during call sessions.
The Presence Server no implements a presence enabler for the PoC service. The Presence Server no accepts, stores and distributes Presence Information for Presentities, such as PoC Clients 136.
The Presence Server no also implements a Resource List Server (RLS), which accepts and manages subscriptions to Presence Lists. Presence Lists enable a “watcher” application to subscribe to the Presence Information of multiple Presentities using a single subscription transaction.
The Presence Server no uses certain XDM functions to provide these functions, which are provided by XDM Server 108.
The XDM Server 108 implements an XDM enabler for the PoC service. The XDM enabler defines a common mechanism that makes user-specific service-related information accessible to the functions that need them. Such information is stored in the XDM Server 108 where it can be located, accessed and manipulated (e.g., created, changed, deleted, etc.). The XDM Server 108 uses well-structured XML documents and HTTP protocol for access and manipulation of such XML documents. The XDM Server 108 also connects to the operator SMSC 128 for the purposes of PoC Client 136 activation using SMS. In addition, the XDM Server 108 maintains the configuration information for all PoC subscribers.
The Gateway 142 implements an interworking solution for the PoC service to communicate via one or more IP network 144 to the PoC Clients 136. Specifically, the Gateway 142 provides PoC service over an IP network 144 (such as an external WiFi network), as well as the wireless data networks 126, and supports a seamless user experience while the transport of IP control messages and IP voice data is transitioned between different types of wireless communications networks, such as wireless data networks 126 comprising cellular data packet networks and IP networks 144. The Gateway 142 also resolves security concerns that arise with such interworking solutions.
This is necessary because the quality, performance and availability of the wireless data networks 126 typically vary from location to location based on various factors. In addressing these issues, the interworking solution implemented by the Gateway 142 provides following benefits:
These and other aspects of the interworking solution are described in more detail below.
These elements are described in more detail below.
The EMS Server 116 is an operations, administration, and maintenance platform for the system 100. The EMS Server 116 enables system administrators to perform system-related configuration, network monitoring and network performance data collection functions. The EMS Server 116, or another dedicated server, may also provide billing functions. All functions of the EMS Server 116 are accessible through a web-based interface.
The LI Server 118 is used for tracking services required by various Lawful Enforcement Agents (LEAs). The LI Server 118 generates and pushes an IRI (Intercept Related Information) Report for all PoC services used by a target. The target can be added or deleted in to the PoC Server 112 via the LI Server 118 using a Command Line Interface (CLI).
The WGP Server 122 provides a web interface for corporate administrators to manage PoC contacts and groups. The web interface includes contact and group management operations, such as create, delete and update contacts and groups.
The WCSR Server 120 provides access to customer service representatives (CSRs) for managing end user provisioning and account maintenance.
Typically, it supports the following operations:
The following sections describe various functions performed by each of the components of the system architecture.
The PoC Server 112 controls PoC/PTT call sessions, including 1-1, Ad Hoc and Pre-Arranged PoC/PTT call sessions. The PoC Server 112 also controls Instant Personal Alerts.
The PoC Server 112 expects the PoC Clients 136 to setup “pre-established sessions” at the time of start up and use these sessions to make outgoing calls. The PoC Server 112 also uses pre-established sessions to terminate incoming calls to the PoC Clients 136. The PoC Clients 136 are setup in auto-answer mode by default. The use of pre-established sessions and auto-answer mode together allow for faster call setup for call sessions.
The PoC Server 112 allocates and manages the media ports of the Media Servers 114 associated with each SIP INVITE dialog for pre-established sessions and controls the Media Servers 114 to dynamically associate these ports at run time for sending RTP packets during call sessions. Media ports are assigned and tracked by the PoC Server 112 at the time of setting up pre-established sessions. The PoC Server 112 instructs the Media Server 114 to associate the media ports of various subscribers dynamically into a session when a PoC call is originated and this session is maintained for the duration of the call. The PoC Server 112 also controls the floor states of the various participants in a PoC call session by receiving indications from the Media Servers 114 and sending appropriate requests back to the Media Servers 114 to send MBCP messages to the participants in the call. The Media Server 114 uses the media ports association and current talker information to send the RTP packets from the talker's media port onto the listeners' media ports.
In addition, the PoC Server 112 handles the incoming and outgoing Instant Personal Alerts (IPAs) by routing SIP MESSAGE requests to the PoC Clients 136 and remote PoC Servers 112 for final delivery as applicable.
The PoC Server 112 uses static and dynamic data related to each subscriber to perform these functions. Static data include subscriber profile, contacts and groups. Dynamic data include the subscriber's registration state, PoC/PTT settings and SIP dialog states are maintained only on the PoC Server 112.
The Media Server 114 handles the flow of data to and from the PoC Clients 136 as instructed by the PoC Server 112. Each Media Server 114 is controlled by a single PoC Server 112, although multiple Media Servers 114 may be controlled by a PoC Server 112 simultaneously.
The Media Server 114 is completely controlled by the PoC Server 112. As noted above, even the media ports of the Media Server 114 are allocated by the PoC Server 112 and then communicated to the Media Server 114. Likewise, floor control requests received by the Media Server 114 from PoC Clients 136 are sent to the PoC Server 112, and the PoC Server 112 instructs the Media Server 114 appropriately. Based on these instructions, the Media Server 114 sends floor control messages to the PoC Clients 136 and sends the RTP packets received from the talker to all the listeners.
The Presence Server no accepts presence information published by PoC Clients 136, as well as availability information received from other entities. The Presence Server no keeps track of these presence states and sends notifications to various “watcher” applications whenever a presence state changes. The Presence Server no maintains separate subscriptions for each watcher and dynamically applies the presence authorization rules for each watcher independently.
The Presence Server no also accepts resource list subscriptions from the watchers, which identify one or more entities (“Presentities”) whose presence should be monitored. The Presence Server no then aggregates all the presence information into one or more presence notifications transmitted to each watcher. This allows watchers to subscribe to large number of Presentities without putting strain on the network as well as client and server resources.
The XDM Server 108 performs client authentication and subscription functions. The XDM Server 108 also stores subscriber and group information data. The XDM Server 108 also interacts with the SMSC 128 to receive PoC Client 136 activation commands.
All subscriber provisioning and CSR operations in the XDM Server 108 are performed through the WCSR Server 120, while corporate administrative operations, as well as contacts and group management, are handled through the WGP Server 122.
The XDM Server 108 includes a Subscriber Profile Manager module that provides subscriber management functionality, such as creation, deletion and modification of subscriber profiles. The subscriber profile includes data such as the MDN, subscriber name, subscriber type, etc. This also determines other system-wide configurations applicable for the subscriber including the maximum number of contacts and groups per subscriber and the maximum number of members per group.
The XDM Server 108 includes a Subscriber Data Manager module that manages the subscriber document operations, such as contact and group management operations, initiated by the PoC Clients 136 or the WGP Server 122.
The Gateway 142 performs interworking for the PoC service by communicating with the PoC Clients 136 via one or more IP networks 144 and/or wireless data networks 126.
The PoC Client 136 sets up one or more connections using the configured Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN), or absolute domain name, of the Gateway 142, which may be publicly exposed to the Internet 142. Secure transport protocols may (or may not) be used for the connections across the IP networks 144 and/or wireless data networks 126. For example, the PoC Clients 136 may use the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and/or Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols for encrypting information transmitted over the connections between the PoC Client 136 and the Gateway 142.
In such an embodiment, all SIP signaling and voice data (RTP and RTCP) would be tunneled over the SSL/TLS connections between the PoC Client 136 and the Gateway 142. XCAP signaling may be transmitted using a Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS) protocol, which results from layering the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) on top of the SSL/TLS connections, thus adding the security capabilities of SSL/TLS to standard HTTP communications.
Consequently, the Gateway 142 may perform as an encryption/decryption off-loader that provides end-to-end encryption for all traffic transmitted to and from the PoC Client 136. Specifically, all of the traffic sent to the PoC Client 136 may be encrypted at the Gateway 142 and all the traffic received from the PoC Client 136 may be decrypted at the Gateway 142.
The Gateway 142 terminates the SSL/TLS connections and aggregates or dis-aggregates the PoC Client 136 traffic to the appropriate Servers 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120 and 122. Specifically, the Gateway 142 acts as an intelligent traffic distributor for SIP signaling and RTP/RTCP traffic by forwarding the traffic to the appropriate Servers 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120 and 122, depending on the message types and the availability of the Servers 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120 and 122. Consequently, the Gateway 142 is a single point-of-contact for all traffic to and from the PoC Clients 136 at an IP transport layer via the IP networks 144 and/or wireless data networks 126.
Typically, the SSL/TLS connections are persisted and used for any bidirectional data transfer between the Gateway 142, or other Servers, and the PoC Clients 136. Thus, a PoC Client 136 maintains an “always-on” connection with the Gateway 142 by periodically sending “keep-alive” messages over the SSL/TLS connections.
The system also simplifies the use of the WiFi APs 146 and Firewalls 148 or other network appliances.
The EMS Server 116 is the central management entity in the system and includes the following modules:
The WCSR Server 120 provides a web user interface for customer service representatives (CSRs) to carry out various operations. The web user interface provides access to CSRs for managing subscriber provisioning and account maintenance. Typically, it supports the following operations.
The WGP Server 122 allows provides for central management of all corporate subscribers and associated contacts and groups within a corporation. The WGP Server 122 allows corporate administrators to manage contacts and groups for corporate subscribers.
The WGP Server 122 includes a Corporate Administration Tool (CAT) that is used by corporate administrators to manage contacts and groups of corporate subscribers. The CAT has a Web User Interface for corporate administrators that supports the following operations:
With regard to group management, the CAT of the WGP Server 122 includes the following operations:
With regard to contact management, the CAT of the WGP Server 122 includes the following operations:
With regard to associations between corporations, the CAT of the WGP Server 122 includes the following operations:
Once the association is created and accepted, corporate administrators can create contacts and groups using the association policies. Administrators from other corporations can view the contacts, and may or may not have the capability to add, update or delete the contacts.
Note that, if the association is deleted, then usually all intercorporate contacts and group members will be deleted.
The PoC Client 136 is an OMA-compatible client application executed on a handset 134. The following features are supported by the PoC Client 136:
The PoC Client 136 includes a database module, a presence module, an XDM module and a client module.
The database module stores configuration information, presence information, contact and group information, user settings, and other information in an optimized and persistent way. Information is preserved when the user unregisters with the PoC Server 112 or power cycles the device. The database module also has a mechanism to reset the data and synchronize from the XDM Server 108 when the data in the database module is corrupt or unreadable.
The presence module creates and maintains the presence information for the subscriber. Typically, the presence information supports Available, Unavailable and Do-not-Disturb (DnD) states. The presence module also subscribes to the Presence Server no as a “watcher” of all contacts in the handset 134 and updates the user interface of the handset 134 whenever it receives a notification with such presence information.
The XDM module communicates with the XDM Server 108 for management of contacts and groups. The XDM module may subscribe with the XDM Server 108 to send and receive any changes to the contacts or group list, and updates the user interface of the handset 134 based on the notifications it receives from the XDM Server 108.
The client module provides the most important function of making and receiving PoC/PTT calls. To support PoC/PTT calls, the client module creates and maintains pre-established sessions with the PoC Server 112. The client module supports 1-1, Ad Hoc and Pre-Arranged PoC/PTT calls. The client module also supports sending and receiving Instant Personal Alerts (IPA).
State 200 represents a PoC Client 136 in a NULL state, i.e., the start of the logic. A transition out of this state is triggered by a user making a request to originate a PTT call, or by a request being made to terminate a PTT call at the handset 134. A request to originate a PTT call is normally made by pressing a PTT button, but may be initiated in this embodiment by dialing some sequence of one or more numbers on the handset 134 that are interpreted by the PoC Server 112, by pressing one or more other keys on the handset 134 that are interpreted by the PoC Server 112, by speaking one or more commands that are interpreted by the PoC Server 112, or by some other means.
State 202 represents the PoC Client 136 in an active group call state, having received a “floor grant” (permit to speak). In this state, the user receives a chirp tone that indicates that the user may start talking. The user responds by talking on the handset 134. The handset 134 uses the reverse traffic channel to send voice frames to the Media Server 114, and the Media Server 114 switches voice frames only in one direction, i.e., from talker to one or more listeners, which ensures the half-duplex operation required for a PTT call.
State 204 represents the group “floor” being available to all members of the group. When the talking user signals that the floor is released, the floor is available to all group members. The signal to release the floor is normally made by releasing the PTT button, but may be performed in this embodiment by voice activity detection, e.g., by not speaking for some time period (which is interpreted by the PoC Server 112 as a release command). All members of the group receive a “free floor” tone on their handset 134. A user who requests the floor first (in the “free-floor” state), for example, is granted the floor, wherein the system 100 sends a chirp tone to the successful user. The signal to request the floor is normally made by pressing the PTT button, but may be performed in this embodiment by voice activity detection, e.g., by speaking for some time period (which is interpreted by the PoC Server 112 as a request command).
State 206 represents the PoC Client 136 being in an active group call state. In this state, the user is listening to the group call. If a non-talking user requests the floor in the active group call state, the user does not receive any response from the system 100 and remains in the same functional state. As noted above, the signal to request the floor is normally made by pressing the PTT button, but may be performed in this embodiment by voice activity detection, e.g., by speaking for some time period (which is interpreted by the PoC Server 112 as a request command).
State 208 represents a user receiving an “unsuccessful bidding” tone on his handset 134, after the user has requested the floor, but was not granted the floor, of the group call. The user subsequently listens to the voice message of the talking user.
Non-talking users (including the talking user who must release the floor to make it available for others) can request the system 100 to end their respective call legs explicitly.
State 210 represents a terminating leg being released from the call after the user ends the call.
State 212 also represents a terminating leg being released from the call after the user ends the call.
State 214 represents all terminating legs being released from the call when no user makes a request for the within a specified time period, or after all users have ended their respective call legs.
This invention describes a method and apparatus for providing dynamic QoS over a network for PTT services. The invention includes methods utilized to establish dedicated bearers statically or dynamically, without incurring any additional delay during PTT call setup time. Various criteria can be applied based on policies defined per corporation, per subscribers, or per any dynamic conditions, such as load conditions. Policies may be derived based on the priority of the PTT call, that can be determined based on a static configuration, or that can be decided based on dynamic conditions.
The PoC Server 112 performs the role of an Application Function (AF) according to the IMS standard, and a Policy Charging and Rules Function (PCRF) defined by the IMS standard is implemented in a PCRF Server 150, which is also shown in
The PCRF Server 150 provides policy control decision and flow based charging control functionalities. For example, the PCRF Server 150 provides network control regarding service data flow detection, gating, QoS, and flow based charging to a Policy Control Enforcement Function (PCEF) defined by the IMS standard and implemented in the PGW 138, although the PCEF could be implemented in another server in the system 100.
The PoC Server 112 uses the Rx interface to communicate with the PCRF Server 150 during call initiation and re-negotiation to ensure that a call conforms to policy. The PoC Server 112 also uses the Rx interface during registration to learn access network 126 information.
Specifically, the PCRF Server 150 performs the following functions for the PoC Server 112 via the Rx interface:
The PCEF implemented by the PGW 138 provides service data flow detection, user plane traffic handling, triggering control plane session management, QoS handling, service data flow measurement, as well as online and offline charging interactions. The PCEF enforces the policy control as indicated by the PCRF Server 150, e.g., the PCRF Server 150 determines how a certain data flow is treated in the PCEF and ensures that the enforcement function traffic mapping and treatment is in accordance with a user's subscription profile. The PCRF Server 150 delivers rules concerning traffic classification, QoS, and charging to the PCEF in the PGW 138 via a Gx interface.
The PoC system 100 also includes a Home Subscriber Server (HSS) function, which is implemented in an HSS Server 152, which is also shown in
In the context of PTT service, there are premium subscribers who want to have better user experience on their UE device, e.g., the handset 134, as compared to regular PTT users. Also, the ability to provide preferential treatment for PIT traffic over other regular internal traffic, such as Internet browsing or file downloads, can be critical to real-time voice services, such as PTT, Voice-over-LTE (VoLTE), etc. To be able to fulfill this, QoS plays a key role, in that QoS defines priorities for certain customers and/or services during the time of high congestion in the network 126.
In an EPC/LTE access network 126, QoS is implemented between the handset 134 and the PGW 138, and is applied to a set of bearers. In this context, “bearer” is basically a virtual concept and is a set of network configurations to provide special treatment to set of traffic, e.g., PTT traffic is prioritized by the network 126 as compared to other traffic.
A bearer is a mechanism that enables the network 126 to discriminate both in quality and charging for different applications. When a handset 134 attaches to the network 126 for the first time, it is assigned a “default bearer,” which remains as long as the handset 134 is attached. Devices can have more than one default bearer, but each default bearer has a separate, unique IP address. The default bearer does not provide a GBR, and typically, non-GBR QCI values can be specified.
A dedicated bearer is essentially a dedicated tunnel for one or more specific applications (e.g., PTT, VoIP, video, gaming, etc.). A dedicated bearer does not require a separate IP address, and uses the IP address associated with the previously-established default bearer. A Traffic Flow Template (TFT) is used to specify QoS settings for a specific traffic application carried on a dedicated bearer, which can be GBR or non-GBR depending on the QCI value chosen to support a specific use case.
In this invention, QoS support for the PTT services can be provided by one of the following mechanisms:
(a) Network-Based Static Default QoS Bearers: QoS parameters in the network 126 are set up for any PTT traffic between the PoC Client 136 and the PoC Server 112 that requires QoS treatment based on the pre-defined IP addresses of the PoC Server 112 and Media Server 114, and the IP address range of the handset 134 in the network 126. Static QoS bearers are “nailed-up” connections, which are subscription-based and which are established when the handsets 134 for the subscribers are powered on and the PoC Client 136 is logged into the PoC system 100, wherein the connections stay on until the devices 134 are turned off. Here, the signaling path and media path are established on the default bearer by way of a static QoS configuration in the PCRF Server 150.
With this method, all the IP traffic between the PoC Client 136 and the PoC Server 112 receives the QoS treatment on the default bearer. However, this method does not allow for detection of situations where default QoS bearers cannot be established by the network 126, for example, because of network 126 congestion. There are several other downsides from an EPC/LTE perspective as well, as the network 126 cannot use intelligent admission control strategies to predict and admit users.
(b) Pre-Established Dynamic Dedicated QoS Bearer: The PoC Server 112 dynamically establishes one or more dedicated QoS bearers when the PoC Client 136 performs a login to the PoC system 100. This implies that the PoC Server 112 pre-establishes a dedicated QoS bearer in advance by providing the TFT information containing the IP addresses and port numbers of the PoC Server 112, Media Server 114 and handset 134 to the PCRF Server 150 using the Rx interface. This approach avoids the need to configure static QoS bearers in the network 126, but results in dedicated QoS bearers being used when there is no active PoC call in progress.
(c) Dynamic Dedicated QoS Bearer at Call Setup: In this case, the dedicated QoS bearers are established only when needed at PTT call setup. However, if the PTT call setup is delayed until the setup of the dynamic dedicated QoS bearer is completed, using the Rx interface would mean an addition delay (about 200-450 ms) for the PTT call setup. Dynamically establishing the dedicated QoS bearer requires communicating among various network 126 elements, which, in turn, increases the delay until the handset 134 is connected to the network 126.
This invention describes methods and systems to overcome the various limitations described above. This invention particularly focuses on providing QoS service dynamically using the Rx interface, without compromising any key service parameters such as PTT call setup time.
To establish dedicated QoS bearers dynamically at the time of the PTT call setup, the PoC Server 112 communicates with the PCRF Server 150 via the Rx interface to manage the QoS and authorize the usage of specific bearer services in relation to the PTT call. The Rx interface is used for the service-based policy set-up information exchange between the PCRF Server and the PoC Server 112.
As described previously, the PTT service uses a combination of SIP and RTCP messages for call signaling, and RTP for media. There are two possible deployment options to carry SIP traffic:
Preferably, the RTP and RTCP traffic are carried over dynamic dedicated QoS bearers with the required QoS. However, in order to preserve the PTT call setup time, the dynamic dedicated QoS bearers are established in parallel while PTT call setup is in progress over the default bearer. That means the RTCP and RTP packets are carried over the default bearer until the dynamic dedicated QoS bearers are established dynamically.
This mechanism as shown in
The use of various bearers for the PoC services is described below:
The PoC service can support multiple levels of priority, in which the priority of the dynamic dedicated bearers depends on user roles and types of calls. For example, dedicated bearers may only be used for dispatch group calls and dispatcher calls, but not for calls between fleet members. In another example, when a PoC call is setup with emergency priority, then dedicated bearers used for this call could have the highest priority and would pre-empt any other calls or data sessions in progress, and the dedicated bearers used for the emergency call itself could not be pre-empted by other types of data sessions or calls. Still another example is that a broadcast call may have a higher priority than normal PoC calls, and hence may pre-empt such PoC calls.
This can be achieved by using the capabilities of a Policy and Charging Framework (PCF) defined by the LTE standard that allows for specifying parameters to define the priority and pre-emption capability of a dedicated bearer. Specifically, Allocation Retention Priority (ARP) is a key parameter that is applied during congestion situations for preemption. ARP is stored in the subscriber profile (HSS), typically on a per APN basis, and is not included within the EPS QoS profile sent to the handset 134.
ARP has following three sub-parameters:
1. The PoC Server 112 first attempts to establish the PTT call regardless of whether the dynamic QoS feature is enabled or not.
2. At the time of PTT call initiation, the PoC Server 112 validates the following on the calling and each called party's call leg before sending a request to setup a dynamic dedicated QoS bearer for that call leg:
3. If the configuration is enabled to upgrade all call legs to dynamic QoS, regardless of subscription, and at least one participant has dynamic QoS subscribed, then for each of the participants including calling and called parties that have not subscribed for dynamic QoS, the PoC Server 112 validates the following before sending a request to setup the dynamic dedicated QoS bearer for that call leg:
4. For each of the call legs, if the corresponding subscriber is not currently on the network 126, then the dynamic dedicated QoS bearer shall not be setup for that subscriber regardless of their feature subscription.
5. After the dynamic dedicated QoS bearer has been setup for a call leg due to their feature subscription or due to upgrading all of the call legs within a PTT call, each call leg's dynamic dedicated QoS bearer shall be handled independently of other participants in the PTT call.
6. The PoC Server 112 stores information that the call itself is upgraded to a dynamic dedicated QoS bearer for all call legs at the time of call initiation and applies this information for all call legs in this call for the duration of the call.
1. When a call leg disconnects from a PTT call and a dynamic dedicated QoS bearer has been setup for that call leg, then the PoC Server 112 sends an Rx interface request to release the dynamic dedicated QoS bearer for that call leg.
2. When a PTT call ends, either due to only one participant remaining on the call or the floor idle timer expiring, then the PoC Server 112 releases the dynamic dedicated QoS bearer for each call leg, if it has been setup for that call leg for the PTT call.
1. When a subscriber moves out of the coverage area of the network 126:
2. When a subscriber moves into the coverage area of the network 126:
The following table provides a detailed summary of the various use cases on transitions between the WiFi network 144 and the EPC/LTE access network 126:
The following table provides a detailed summary of the various use cases on LTE network 126 and non-LTE network transitions, for example, using different Radio Access Technology (RAT), such as eHRPD, 3G/UMTS, HSPA, etc.
The following table provides a detailed summary of the dedicated bearers at the time of call setup and during the call.
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not with this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
This application is a continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/058804, filed on Nov. 3, 2015, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of the following commonly-assigned patent application: U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/074,386, filed on Nov. 3, 2014, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Ramu Kandula, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, and Ramu Kandula, entitled “METHOD TO PROVIDE DYNAMIC QoS FOR PoC USING Rx INTERFACE,” which applications are incorporated by reference herein. This application is related to the following commonly-assigned patent applications: U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/515,556, filed Nov. 23, 2004, by Gorachand Kundu, Ravi Ayyasamy and Krishnakant Patel, entitled “DISPATCH SERVICE ARCHITECTURE FRAMEWORK,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,787,896, issued Aug. 31, 2010, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 365 of P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US03/16386, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/382,981, 60/383,179 and 60/407,168; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/564,903, filed Jan. 17, 2006, by F. Craig Farrill, Bruce D. Lawler and Krishnakant M. Patel, entitled “PREMIUM VOICE SERVICES FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 365 of P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US04/23038, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/488,638, 60/492,650 and 60/576,094 and which application is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Sections 119, 120 and/or 365 of P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US03/16386; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/126,587, filed May 11, 2005, by Ravi Ayyasamy and Krishnakant M. Patel, entitled “ARCHITECTURE, CLIENT SPECIFICATION AND APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE (API) FOR SUPPORTING ADVANCED VOICE SERVICES (AVS) INCLUDING PUSH TO TALK ON WIRELESS HANDSETS AND NETWORKS,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,892, issued Jun. 15, 2010, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/569,953 and 60/579,309, and which application is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Sections 119, 120 and/or 365 of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/515,556 and P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US04/23038; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/129,268, filed May 13, 2005, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Gorachand Kundu, Ravi Ayyasamy and Basem Ardah, entitled “ROAMING GATEWAY FOR SUPPORT OF ADVANCED VOICE SERVICES WHILE ROAMING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,403,775, issued Jul. 22, 2008, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/571,075, and which application is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Sections 119, 120 and/or 365 of U.S. Utility Application Ser. No. 10/515,556 and P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US04/03038; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/134,883, filed May 23, 2005, by Krishnakant Patel, Vyankatesh V. Shanbhag, Ravi Ayyasamy, Stephen R. Horton and Shan-Jen Chiou, entitled “ADVANCED VOICE SERVICES ARCHITECTURE FRAMEWORK,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,764,950, issued Jul. 27, 2010, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/573,059 and 60/576,092, and which application is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Sections 119, 120 and/or 365 of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/515,556, P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US04/23038, U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/126,587, and U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/129,268; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/136,233, filed May 24, 2005, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Vyankatesh Vasant Shanbhag, and Anand Narayanan, entitled “SUBSCRIBER IDENTITY MODULE (SIM) ENABLING ADVANCED VOICE SERVICES (AVS) INCLUDING PUSH-TO-TALK, PUSH-TO-CONFERENCE AND PUSH-TO-MESSAGE ON WIRELESS HANDSETS AND NETWORKS,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,896, issued Jun. 15, 2010, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/573,780, and which application is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Sections 119, 120 and/or 365 of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/515,556, P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US04/23038, U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/126,587, and U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/134,883; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/158,527, filed Jun. 22, 2005, by F. Craig Farrill, entitled “PRESS-TO-CONNECT FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,529,557, issued May 5, 2009, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/581,954, and which application is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Sections 119, 120 and/or 365 of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 10/515,556 and P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US04/23038; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/183,516, filed Jul. 18, 2005, by Deepankar Biswaas, entitled “VIRTUAL PUSH TO TALK (PTT) AND PUSH TO SHARE (PTS) FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/588,464; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/356,775, filed Feb. 17, 2006, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Bruce D. Lawler, Giridhar K. Boray, and Brahmananda R. Vempati, entitled “ENHANCED FEATURES IN AN ADVANCED VOICE SERVICES (AVS) FRAMEWORK FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,813,722, issued Oct. 12, 2010, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/654,271; P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2006/011628, filed Mar. 30, 2006, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Gorachand Kundu, Sameer Dharangaonkar, Giridhar K. Boray, and Deepankar Biswas, entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR IMPLEMENTING ADVANCED VOICE SERVICES USING AN UNSTRUCTURED SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICE DATA (USSD) INTERFACE,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/666,424; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/462,332, filed Aug. 3, 2006, by Deepankar Biswas, Krishnakant M. Patel, Giridhar K. Boray, and Gorachand Kundu, entitled “ARCHITECTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CLOSED USER GROUP AND LIMITING MOBILITY IN WIRELESS NETWORKS,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,689,238, issued Mar. 30, 2010, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/705,115; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/463,186, filed Aug. 8, 2006, by Ravi Ayyasamy and Krishnakant M. Patel, entitled “ADVANCED VOICE SERVICES CLIENT FOR BREW PLATFORM,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,036,692, issued Oct. 11, 2011, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/706,265; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/567,098, filed Dec. 5, 2006, by Ravi Ayyasamy, Bruce D. Lawler, Krishnakant M. Patel, Vyankatesh V. Shanbhag, Brahmananda R. Vempati, and Ravi Shankar Kumar, entitled “INSTANT MESSAGING INTERWORKING IN AN ADVANCED VOICE SERVICES (AVS) FRAMEWORK FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/742,250; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/740,805, filed Apr. 26, 2007, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Giridhar K. Boray, Ravi Ayyasamy, and Gorachand Kundu, entitled “ADVANCED FEATURES ON A REAL-TIME EXCHANGE SYSTEM,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,853,279, issued Dec. 14, 2010, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/795,090; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 11/891,127, filed Aug. 9, 2007, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Deepankar Biswas, Sameer P. Dharangaonkar and Terakanambi Nanjanayaka Raja, entitled “EMERGENCY GROUP CALLING ACROSS MULTIPLE WIRELESS NETWORKS,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/836,521; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/259,102, filed on Oct. 27, 2008, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Gorachand Kundu, and Ravi Ayyasamy, entitled “CONNECTED PORTFOLIO SERVICES FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/982,650 and 61/023,042; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/359,861, filed on Jan. 26, 2009, by Bruce D. Lawler, Krishnakant M. Patel, Ravi Ayyasamy, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, Binu Kaiparambil, Shiva Cheedella, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Ravi Shankar Kumar, and Avrind Shanbhag, entitled “CONVERGED MOBILE-WEB COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTION,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,676,189, issued Mar. 18, 2014, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/023,332; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/582,601, filed Oct. 20, 2009, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Ravi Ayyasamy, Gorachand Kundu, Basem A. Ardah, Anand Narayanan, Brahmananda R. Vempati, and Pratap Chandana, entitled “HYBRID PUSH-TO-TALK FOR MOBILE PHONE NETWORKS,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,958,348, issued Feb. 17, 2015, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/106,689; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/781,566, filed on May 17, 2010, by Bruce D. Lawler, Krishnakant M. Patel, Ravi Ayyasamy, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, Binu Kaiparambil, Shiva K. K. Cheedella, Brahmananda R. Vempati, and Ravi Shankar Kumar, entitled “CONVERGED MOBILE-WEB COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTION,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,670,760, issued Mar. 11, 2014, which application is a continuation-in-part and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Sections 119, 120 and/or 365 of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/582,601; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/750,175, filed on Mar. 30, 2010, by Bruce D. Lawler, Krishnakant M. Patel, Ravi Ayyasamy, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, Basem A. Ardah, Gorachund Kundu, Ramu Kandula, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Ravi Shankar Kumar, Chetal M. Patel, and Shiva K. K. Cheedella, entitled “ENHANCED GROUP CALLING FEATURES FOR CONNECTED PORTFOLIO SERVICES IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,498,660, issued Jul. 30, 2013, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 61/164,754 and 61/172,129; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/961,419, filed Dec. 6, 2010, by Ravi Ayyasamy, Bruce D. Lawler, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Gorachand Kundu and Krishnakant M. Patel, entitled “COMMUNITY GROUP CLIENT AND COMMUNITY AUTO DISCOVERY SOLUTIONS IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/266,896; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/039,635, filed on Mar. 3, 2011, by Narasimha Raju Nagubhai, Ravi Shankar Kumar, Krishnakant M. Patel, and Ravi Ayyasamy, entitled “PREPAID BILLING SOLUTIONS FOR PUSH-TO-TALK IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,369,829, issued Feb. 5, 2013, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/310,245; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/093,542, filed Apr. 25, 2011, by Brahmananda R. Vempati, Krishnakant M. Patel, Pratap Chandana, Anand Narayanan, Ravi Ayyasamy, Bruce D. Lawler, Basem A. Ardah, Ramu Kandula, Gorachand Kundu, Ravi Shankar Kumar, and Bibhudatta Biswal, and entitled “PREDICTIVE WAKEUP FOR PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR (PoC) CALL SETUP OPTIMIZATIONS,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,478,261, issued Jul. 2, 2013, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/347,217; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/710,683, filed Dec. 11, 2012, by Ravi Ayyasamy, Gorachand Kundu, Krishnakant M. Patel, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Harisha M. Negalaguli, Shiva K. K. Cheedella, Basem A. Ardah, Ravi Shankar Kumar, Ramu Kandula, Arun Velayudhan, Shibu Narendranathan, Bharatram Setti, Anand Narayanan, and Pratap Chandana, entitled “PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR (PoC),” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/570,694; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/917,561, filed Jun. 13, 2013, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Anand Narayanan, Gregory J. Morton, and Ravi Ayyasamy, entitled “RUGGEDIZED CASE OR SLEEVE FOR PROVIDING PUSH-TO-TALK (PTT) FUNCTIONS,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/659,292; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/682,524; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/705,748; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/757,520, filed Feb. 1, 2013, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Shiva Koteshwara Kiran Cheedella, Arun Velayudhan, Raajeev Kuppa, Gorachand Kundu, Ravi Ganesh Ramamoorthy, Ramu Kandula, Ravi Ayyasamy, and Ravi Shankar Kumar, entitled “WiFi INTERWORKING SOLUTIONS FOR PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR (PoC),” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,088,876, issued Jul. 21, 2015, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 61/593,485; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/093,240, filed Nov. 29, 2013, by Gorachand Kundu, Krishnakant M. Patel, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, Ramu Kandula, and Ravi Ayyasamy, entitled “METHOD AND FRAMEWORK TO DETECT SERVICE USERS IN INSUFFICIENT WIRELESS RADIO COVERAGE NETWORK AND IMPROVE SERVICE DELIVERY EXPERIENCE BY GUARANTEED PRESENCE,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,137,646, issued Sep. 15, 2015, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/730,856; P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2014/036414, filed May 1, 2014, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, Arun Velayudhan, Ramu Kandula, Syed Nazir Khadar, Shiva Koteshwara Kiran Cheedella, and Subramanyam Narasimha Prashanth, entitled “VOICE-OVER-IP (VOIP) DENIAL OF SERVICE (DOS) PROTECTION MECHANISMS FROM ATTACK,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/818,109; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/821,975; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/286,427, filed May 23, 2014, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Ravi Ayyasamy and Brahmananda R. Vempati, entitled “METHOD TO ACHIEVE A FULLY ACKNOWLEDGED MODE COMMUNICATION IN PUSH-TO-TALK OVER CELLULAR (PoC),” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/826,895; P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2014/047863, filed on Jul. 23, 2014, by Gorachand Kundu, Giridhar K. Boray, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Krishnakant M. Patel, Ravi Ayyasamy, and Harisha M. Negalaguli, entitled “EFFECTIVE PRESENCE FOR PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR (PoC) NETWORKS,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/857,363; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/944,168; P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US15/10617, filed Jan. 8, 2015, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Brahmananda R. Vempati, and Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, entitled “OPTIMIZED METHODS FOR LARGE GROUP CALLING USING UNICAST AND MULTICAST TRANSPORT BEARER FOR PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR (PoC),” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/924,897; U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/639,794, filed Mar. 5, 2015, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Ravi Ayyasamy, and Bibhudatta Biswal, entitled “PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR (POC) SERVICE IN HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS (HETNETS) AND MULTIMODE SMALL CELL ENVIRONMENTS,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 61/948,429; P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2014/047886, filed on Jul. 23, 2014, by Gorachand Kundu, Giridhar K. Boray, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Krishnakant M. Patel, Ravi Ayyasamy, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, and Ramu Kandula, entitled “RADIO ACCESS NETWORK (RAN) AWARE SERVICE DELIVERY FOR PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR (PoC) NETWORKS,” which application is a continuation-in-part under 35 U.S.C. Section 120 of P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2014/047863; and P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2015/45951, filed on Aug. 19, 2015, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Brahmananda R. Vempati, and Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, entitled “RELAY-MODE AND DIRECT-MODE OPERATIONS FOR PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR (PoC) USING WIFI TECHNOLOGIES,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/039,272; P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2015/56712, filed on Oct. 21, 2015, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Ramu Kandula, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Pravat Kumar Singh, and Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, entitled “SYSTEM FOR INTER-COMMUNICATION BETWEEN LAND MOBILE RADIO AND PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR SYSTEMS,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/066,533; P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2015/58088, filed on Oct. 29, 2015, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Bibhudatta Biswal, Ravi Ayyasamy, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, and Ramu Kandula, entitled “METHODS TO LEVERAGE WEB REAL-TIME COMMUNICATION FOR IMPLEMENTING PUSH-TO-TALK SOLUTIONS,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 62/072,135 and 62/117,575; P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2015/058821, filed on Nov. 3, 2015, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, and Ramu Kandula, entitled “ARCHITECTURE FRAMEWORK TO REALIZE PUSH-TO-X SERVICES USING CLOUD-BASED STORAGE SERVICES,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/074,391; P.C.T. International Application Serial Number PCT/US2015/058880, filed on Nov. 3, 2015, by Krishnakant M. Patel, Ramu Kandula, Brahmananda R. Vempati, Pravat Kumar Singh, and Harisha Mahabaleshwara Negalaguli, entitled “METHOD FOR MULTIPLEXING MEDIA STREAMS TO OPTIMIZE NETWORK RESOURCE USAGE FOR PUSH-TO-TALK-OVER-CELLULAR SERVICE,” which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 62/074,472 and 62/111,409; all of which applications are incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3912874 | Botterell et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
| 4796293 | Blinken et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 5353328 | Jokimies | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5442809 | Diaz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5546449 | Hogan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5711011 | Urs et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5752196 | Ahvenainen et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5987318 | Alperovich et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987331 | Grube et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6011976 | Michaels et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021326 | Nguyen | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6138011 | Sanders, iii et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141556 | Dougherty et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6192119 | Wilson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6304558 | Mysore | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6397054 | Hoirup et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405030 | Suprunov | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411815 | Balasuriya | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6473501 | Paulsrud | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6477366 | Valentine et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6477387 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6549773 | Linden et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6577874 | Dailey | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6606305 | Boyle et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6628937 | Salin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6661878 | Mirashrafi et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6725053 | Rosen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6751468 | Heubel et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6801762 | Huilgol | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6856676 | Pirot et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6865398 | Mangal et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6892074 | Tarkiainen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6895254 | Dorenbosch | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6898436 | Crockett et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6993355 | Pershan | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6996414 | Vishwanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7026926 | Walker, III | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7043266 | Chaturvedi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7082316 | Elden et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7085364 | Ahmed et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7099291 | Harris et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7123905 | Allaway et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7170863 | Denman et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7231225 | Rao et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7236580 | Sarkar et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7330540 | Darby et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7366535 | Glass et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7403775 | Patel et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7460861 | Zabawskj | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7529557 | Farrill | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7689238 | Biswas et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7738861 | Fournier | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7738892 | Ayyasamy et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7738896 | Patel et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7751348 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7764950 | Patel et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7768999 | Dhanoa | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7787896 | Kundu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7797010 | Manroa et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7813722 | Patel et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7853279 | Patel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7941171 | Vempati | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8036692 | Ayyasamy et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8244252 | Descombes | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8369829 | Nagubhai et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8478261 | Vempati et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8498660 | Lawler et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8670760 | Lawler et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8676189 | Lawler et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 20010005372 | Cave et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20020009990 | Kleier et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020024943 | Karaul et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077136 | Maggenti et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020086659 | Lauper | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020086676 | Hendrey et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020102989 | Calvert et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187750 | Majumdar | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196781 | Salovuori | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009463 | Gallant | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030016632 | Refai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030017836 | Vishwanathan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078064 | Chan | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119540 | Mathis | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148779 | Aravamudan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149774 | McConnell et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030153343 | Crockett et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190888 | Mangal et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040032843 | Schaefer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040057449 | Black | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040067751 | Vandermeijden et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040095954 | Varney et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121760 | Wetman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127233 | Harris et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040152441 | Wong | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176100 | Florkey et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040179531 | Bi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196826 | Bao et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203793 | Dorenbosch | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219941 | Haaramo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224710 | Koskelainen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040228292 | Edwards | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040259580 | Florkey et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050047362 | Harris et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101308 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111430 | Spear et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119012 | Merheb et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143135 | Brems et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050164737 | Brown | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189337 | Baune | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192041 | Oxley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050202807 | Ayyasamy et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050220079 | Asokan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221819 | Patel et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050232241 | Wu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239485 | Kundu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050254464 | Patel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261016 | Patel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288047 | Ananthanarayanan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060003740 | Munje | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060003751 | Vo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019654 | Farrill | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060029189 | Patel et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030347 | Biswas | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056361 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060067499 | Oliveira et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078064 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060094455 | Hannu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116150 | Bhutiani | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060128411 | Turcanu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178138 | Ostroff et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189337 | Farrill et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060198334 | Civanlar et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229090 | Ladue | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234687 | Patel et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070037562 | Smith-Kerker et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070037597 | Biswas et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070037598 | Ayyasamy et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049314 | Balachandran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070070976 | Mussman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070099609 | Cai | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133757 | Girouard et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154005 | Daigle | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070189487 | Sharland et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070190492 | Schmitt | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070190984 | Ayyasamy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070197234 | Gill et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204039 | Inamdar | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070217591 | Yasuma | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070218885 | Pfleging et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253347 | Patel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259673 | Willars | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080064364 | Patel et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080096597 | Vempati | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080126230 | Bellora et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147671 | Simon et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080299953 | Rao | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090092116 | Jiang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090119678 | Shih et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149167 | Patel et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209235 | Lawler et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325540 | Yach et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100035593 | Fanco et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142414 | Patel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100190492 | Jiang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100234018 | Lawler et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110065481 | Patel et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151917 | Mao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110183659 | Ayyasamy et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110250923 | Miller et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120033623 | Chu | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20130155875 | Ayyasamy et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130196706 | Patel et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130315164 | Arur | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130337859 | Patel | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140064210 | Anchan | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140148210 | Kundu et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140185470 | Bernath | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2338150 | Mar 1998 | GB |
| 200392776 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 00069189 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| 0079825 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0167674 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 02101981 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 03101007 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| 2005009006 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| 2005112494 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2005115032 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2005117474 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006105287 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2010048217 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010117815 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| ETSI: “ETSI TS 100 812-2 v2.3.1 Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) Subscriber Identity Module to Mobile Equipment (SIM-ME) interface; Part 2: Universal Integrated Circuit Card (UfCC) Characteristics of the TSIM application”, ETSI Technical Specification, Oct. 2003, all pages. |
| Nokia: “What is TETRA? Why Nokia TETRA?”, The Nokia TETRA Primer, 2002, pp. 1-29. |
| Skype: “Skype”, Web Archive—Skype, May 22, 2004, pp. 1-2. |
| Trachwell: “TrackWell Software and Tetra Iceland deliver value added services to Tetra users”, Trackwell.com, Oct. 2002, pp. 1-1. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170237790 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62074386 | Nov 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/US2015/058804 | Nov 2015 | US |
| Child | 15585976 | US |
