This application is related to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/841,176, filed on 28 Jun. 2013, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
This invention relates generally to touch-sensitive displays, and more specifically to a new and useful user method for reducing perceived optical distortion of light output through a dynamic tactile interface in the field of touch-sensitive displays.
The following description of the embodiment of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
1. Method and Variation
As shown in
As shown in
2. Applications and Dynamic Tactile Interface
As shown in
The method S100 can therefore be implemented on a computing device incorporating a dynamic tactile interface described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/969,848, filed on 4 Jan. 2008, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/319,334, filed on 5 Jan. 2009, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/497,622, filed on 3 Jul. 2009, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/652,704, filed on 5 Jan. 2010, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/652,708, filed on 5 Jan. 2010, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/830,426, filed on 5 Jul. 2010, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/830,430, filed on 5 Jul. 2010, which are incorporated in their entireties by this reference. For example, the method S100 can be implemented on a smartphone, tablet, mobile phone, personal data assistant (PDA), personal navigation device, personal media player, camera, watch, and/or gaming controller incorporating a dynamic tactile interface. The method S100 can additionally or alternatively be implemented on an automotive console, desktop computer, laptop computer, television, radio, desk phone, light switch or lighting control box, cooking equipment, a (dashboard) display within a vehicle, a commercial display, or any other suitable computing device incorporating a dynamic tactile interface. The digital display can include a touchscreen configured to both output an image and to detect an input, such as by a finger or by a stylus. Alternatively, the computing device can include the digital display that is a discrete display coupled to a touch sensor, such as an optical, capacitive, or resistive touch sensor.
In particular, the method S100 can be implemented on a computing device that includes a digital display coupled to a substrate opposite a tactile layer, and the method S100 can interface with a displacement device to displace a volume of fluid from a reservoir into a cavity adjacent a deformable region of the tactile layer (e.g., Block S130), thereby expanding the cavity and transitioning the deformable region into an expanded setting. In the expanded setting, the tactile surface at the deformable region is thus elevated above the tactile surface at the peripheral region such that an effective thickness of the tactile layer across the deformable region exceeds an effective thickness of the tactile layer across the peripheral region of the dynamic tactile interface.
The substrate, the tactile layer, and the volume of fluid (from hereon after the “dynamic tactile layer”) can each be substantially transparent such that images (or “frames”) rendered on the digital display can be visible to a user through the substrate, tactile layer, and fluid arranged over the digital display. However, the substrate, the tactile layer, and the fluid can each exhibit a refractive index that differs from that of air such that expansion of one or more deformable regions into expanded settings yields variations in thickness across the dynamic tactile layer and thus non-uniform distortion (e.g., refraction) of light output from the digital display through the dynamic tactile layer. In particular, transition of a deformable region of the dynamic tactile layer from the retracted setting into the expanded setting can cause a user to visually detect optical distortion of an image rendered on the digital display, and the method S100 can therefore modify an image rendered on the digital display prior to transition of the deformable region into the expanded setting to reduce a user's perceived optical distortion of the image once the deformable region enters the expanded setting. The method S100 can also systematically (e.g., cyclically) refresh the digital display with modifications of the image to compensate for a dynamically changing profile of the dynamic tactile layer throughout transition of the deformable region from the retracted setting into the expanded, and vice versa.
Furthermore, a user's viewing position relative to the digital display (e.g., the user's viewing angle to and/or viewing distance from the digital display) can dictate how light output through the dynamic tactile layer is perceived by the user, and the user's viewing position relative to the digital display can change over time as the user interacts and interfaces with the computing device such the perceived distortion of light through the dynamic tactile layer changes dynamically during such time. The method S100 can therefore modify (e.g., refresh, update) an image rendered on the digital display to compensate for a change in the user's viewing position relative to the digital display, such as when one or more deformable regions of the dynamic tactile layer is in the expanded setting or is transitioning between the expanded and retracted settings.
In particular, the method S100 can modify an image and/or refresh the digital display within the computing device to reduce or limit perceived light scattering effects, perceived internal reflection of regions of the image, perceived refraction and/or diffraction of the image, perceived directional or preferential light transmission or emission through the substrate (e.g., in favor of more uniform scattering, diffraction, reflection, and/or refraction of light), perceived chromatic dispersion of light transmitted through the dynamic tactile layer, and/or other perceived optical distortions of parallax effects of the displayed image. The method S100 can therefore predict (or estimate) a user viewing position (in Block S120), control a vertical position (e.g., height) of a deformable region (in Block S130), and modify the image displayed on the digital display (in Block S140)—based on the predicted user viewing position and the current position of the deformable region—to reduce and/or minimize optical distortion of the image output by the digital display as perceived by the user. In one example, the method S100 linearly stretches the image—rendered on the digital display—horizontally and/or vertically about a predicted point of focus of the user on the digital display. In another example, the method S100 translates (i.e., shifts laterally or vertically on the digital display) a subregion of the image adjacent (e.g., lying under) a deformable region based on an angle and distance of the user to the deformable region or to the digital display. In yet another example, the method S100 linearly or nonlinearly scales (i.e., alters a size of) a subregion of the image adjacent the deformable region to offset preferential magnification of the subregions of the image by the adjacent deformable region in the expanded setting.
In addition to the position of a deformable region and the user's angle and/or distance from the digital display, the method S100 can additionally or alternatively account for (average) refractive indices, wavelength-specific refractive indices, Abbe numbers, chromatic dispersion of different wavelengths of light, and/or other optical properties of materials within the dynamic tactile interface and/or the digital display to dictate compensation of optical distortion of all of a portion of the image rendered on the digital display. The method S100 can also account for mechanical properties of materials of the dynamic tactile interface, a thickness of a cover glass of the digital display, colors and/or a brightness of the rendered image, a thickness or other geometry of the substrate, tactile layer, and/or deformable regions(s), a gap between the digital display and the substrate, an orientation of the digital display relative to the user, and/or a shape and/or height of a deformable region, a change in thickness across the deformable region of the tactile in between expanded and retracted settings, etc. to dictate compensation of optical distortion of all of a portion of the image rendered on the digital display, such as to limit, reduce, and/or substantially eliminate optical distortion of the displayed image as perceived by a user. Therefore, the method S100 can adjust regions of a displayed image based on viewing position of the user to the digital display, optical properties, mechanical properties, and geometries of components of the computing device, and a three-dimensional profile (e.g., shape) of one or deformable regions across the tactile layer of the dynamic tactile interface.
As described above, the method S100 can repeat systematically to accommodate changes in the user's viewing position relative to the digital display and/or changes in the position of one or more deformable regions over time. In one example implementation, the method S100 estimates or measures a new position of a deformable region (such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/896,090, filed on 16 May 2013, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference), executes a process to estimate (e.g., predict, calculate) the viewing position of the user at a refresh rate, generates a new (or updates an existing) transfer matrix for modifying the image based on the new position of the deformable region and the predicted viewing position of the user, and applies the transfer matrix to the image and renders the updated image on the digital display at the refresh rate. The method S100 can therefore update the image substantially in real-time by cyclically capturing and implementing new user viewing position and/or deformable region position data. In another example implementation, the method S100 generates and applies a new (or update an existing) transfer matrix to the displayed image in response to a change in the predicted user viewing distance that exceeds a threshold distance change (e.g., more than 0.5″) and/or in response to a change in predicted user viewing angle that that exceeds a threshold angle change (e.g., more than 5°). In a similar example implementation, the method S100 generates and applies a new (or update an existing) transfer matrix to the displayed image in response to a setting change of one or more deformable regions, such as if a deformable region transitions from the expanded setting to the retracted setting, transitions from the retracted setting to the expanded setting, or transitions into an intermediate position between the retracted and expanded settings. However, the method S100 can update or modify the image rendered on the digital display in response to any other trigger(s) and/or threshold event(s).
3. Image
Block S110 of the method S100 recites rendering an image on a digital display. Generally, Block S110 functions to render an (initial) image on the digital display, such as when the deformable region is in the retracted setting. In one example, the tactile surface at the deformable region can be substantially flush (i.e., in plane) with the tactile surface at the peripheral region in the retracted setting, and Block S110 can control the digital display within the computing device to render a stock (i.e., standard, unadjusted) image on the digital display. Thus, in this example, Block S130 can expand the deformable region to elevate the tactile layer at the deformable region to a position offset above the peripheral region, and Block S140 can update the digital display to render a new or adjusted image that compensates for optical effects of the deformable region in the expanded setting. In an alternative example, the tactile surface at the deformable region is arranged at a first position above the tactile surface at the peripheral region in the expanded setting, and Block S110 outputs a first adjusted image that compensates for optical irregularities across the dynamic tactile layer stemming from a difference in effective thickness of the dynamic tactile layer across the peripheral region and the deformable region. In this alternative example, Block S130 can expand the deformable region to a second position further elevated above the tactile layer at the peripheral region, and Block S140 can update the digital display to render an adjusted image that compensates for different optical effects of the deformable region in the expanded setting. In a similar alternative example, the tactile surface at the deformable region can be retracted below the tactile surface at the peripheral region in the retracted setting, and Block S110 can output a first adjusted image that compensates for optical distortion of the digital display resulting from the concave form of the tactile surface across the retracted deformable region. In this example, Block S130 can expand the deformable region into a position offset above the deformable region in the retracted setting, such as flush with or offset above the peripheral region, and Block S140 can output a second adjusted image that compensates for non-uniform transmission of light through the dynamic tactile layer across the peripheral region and the deformable region in the expanded setting.
As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/319,334, the dynamic tactile interface can include the tactile layer that defines a peripheral region and a deformable region, the peripheral region adjacent the deformable region and coupled to the substrate opposite a tactile surface. The deformable region can also cooperate with the substrate to define a cavity, a displacement device can be coupled to the cavity via a fluid channel defined within the substrate, and actuation of the displacement device can pump fluid into and out of the cavity to expand and retract the deformable region, respectively. As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/319,334, the dynamic tactile interface can also include multiple deformable regions that can be transitioned between retracted and expanded settings in unison and/or independently, such as through actuation of various valves arranged between one or more displacement devices and one or more cavities and/or fluid channels.
In one implementation, the dynamic tactile interface includes an array of deformable regions patterned across the digital display in a keyboard arrangement. In one example of this implementation, Block S110 controls the digital display to render an initial image of a home screen for a smartphone incorporating the dynamic tactile interface when each deformable region of the dynamic tactile layer is set in the retracted setting. In this example, once a user selects a native text-input application (e.g., a native SMS text messaging application, an email application, a calendar application, a web browser applications including a search bar), Block S110 controls the digital display to render a new image of an interface including a 26-key virtual alphanumeric keyboard at a first time, Block S130 transitions a set of deformable regions—each arranged over and aligned with a key of the virtual keyboard—into the expanded setting over a period of time (e.g., two seconds) following the first time, and Block S140 modifies the position (and size) of one or more displayed keys (based on the user's viewing position) to mitigate perceived misalignment of the keys due to an effective variation in thickness of the tactile layer across the deformable regions.
In another example of the foregoing implementation, the method S100 is implemented through a road vehicle including a console display and a dynamic tactile interface arranged over the console display. In this example, once a user turns the vehicle on, Block S110 controls the console display to render an image of a virtual stereo control interface including multiple stereo control keys (e.g., volume, play, track forward, rewind, saved radio stations, etc.), and Block S130 controls a displacement device to transition a set of deformable regions—each substantially aligned with a virtual key of the virtual stereo control interface rendered on the digital display—within the dynamic tactile layer into the expanded setting. In this example, Block S130 interfaces with one or more cameras arranged within the vehicle to track the eyes of occupants of the vehicles, including when and from what position within the vehicle an occupant looks at the console display, and Block S140 modifies the position of one or more virtual keys rendered on the digital display to improve the perceived alignment of each virtual key with a corresponding deformable region for occupants of the vehicle look directly at the console display. In this example, Block S140 can prioritize modification of the rendered image of the virtual stereo control interface, such as by prioritizing modification of the image for the driver of the vehicle first, then a front-row passenger of the vehicle, and then rear-seat passengers of the vehicle, etc.
Block S110 can therefore interface with the digital display to render the initial image on the digital display. For example, Block S110 can execute on a display driver controlling the digital display or on a processor electrically coupled to the digital display driver within the computing device. Block S110 can output the initial image that defines a complete display area of the digital display, such as by assembly the initial image from icons, stock frames, digital still photographs, text, stock borders, and/or stock figures, etc. Block S110 can also generate the initial image including virtual input regions that visually demarcate one or more input-sensitive regions of a touchscreen (e digital display with an integrated touch sensor) that renders the initial image, and Block S110 can place the virtual input regions within the initial image such that the virtual input regions substantially align with corresponding deformable regions of the dynamic tactile interface in the retracted setting. In one example and as described above, Block S110 can control a touchscreen integrated with the computing device to display a set of virtual alphanumeric keys (e.g., A, B, C, . . . , X, Y, Z) that define an alphanumeric keyboard such that an input on the tactile surface (arranged over the touchscreen) over a particular virtual alphanumeric key triggers input of a corresponding alphanumeric symbol into the computing device. In another example, Block S110 can interface with the digital display a render an image of a home screen with a set of icons, each icon in the set of icons corresponding to a native applications installed on the computing device (e.g., smartphone) and displayed adjacent a corresponding deformable region.
As described above, Block S110 can control the digital display to render a ‘standard’ image for a dynamic tactile interface with a flush and continuous tactile surface (e.g., for the dynamic tactile interface with all deformable region in the retracted setting), the standard image not adjusted to compensate for a user's perceived optical distortion due to a substantially uniform effective thickness of the dynamic tactile layer that yields substantially uniform optical distortion of the image broadcast through the dynamic tactile layer.
Alternatively, Block S110 can implement one or more methods or techniques described below to adjust the initial image based on the user's viewing position relative to the computing device, such as when the tactile surface at the deformable region is offset from the tactile surface at the peripheral region in the retracted setting and/or while the deformable region transitions into the expanded setting. For example, Block S120 can execute prior to or in conjunction with Block S110 to predict a viewing position of a user relative to the digital display, and Block S110 can implement methods or techniques as in Block S140 described below to transform a ‘standard’ image into an initial modified image that compensates for optical distortions precipitated by a non-uniform surface profile of the tactile surface (in the retracted setting) based on the predicted viewing position of the user. However, Block S110 can function in any other way to render (or to interface with a digital display to render) an image on a digital display coupled to a substrate opposite a tactile layer.
4. Optical Distortion
Generally, given a first imaginary line extending from a first point (e.g., a first pixel) on the digital display normal to (a dominant face of) the digital display and bisecting a line between the user's eyes, the user may perceive the first point projected through the dynamic tactile layer without substantial optical distortion. Specifically, the angle of incidence of light output from the digital display—through the dynamic tactile layer—to the user is approximately 0° at the first point, and the angle of refraction of this light output from the first portion of the digital display is approximately 0°, as indicated by Snell's law, which recites
wherein each θ defines an angle measured from a normal boundary between the digital display and the dynamic tactile layer (or between the dynamic tactile layer and air), wherein each v represents a velocity of light through the respective medium in meters per second, and wherein n defines a the refractive index of the respective medium.
However, for a second point (e.g., second pixel) on the digital display offset from the first point, a second imaginary line extending from the second point to a center of the line between the user's eyes may not be normal to the dominant face of the digital display. Specifically, the angle of incidence of light output from second point of the digital display—through the dynamic tactile layer—to the user is non-zero (i.e., greater than 0°) in at least one of two planes perpendicular to the plane of the dominant face of the display. Therefore, light output from the second point of the digital display may refract (i.e., bend) across the junction between the digital display and the dynamic tactile layer and again across the junction between the dynamic tactile layer and air (e.g., at the tactile surface), thereby shifting a perceived position and/or light intensity of the second point on the digital display relative to the first point for the user. Furthermore, a thickness of the dynamic tactile layer over the second point of the digital display can affect a total distance between the actual second point of the digital display and the perceived position of the second point for the user. In particular, the offset between the real and perceived position of the second point can be directly proportional to a thickness of the dynamic tactile layer over (and around) the second point. Therefore, as the deformable regions with the dynamic tactile layer transition from the retracted setting into the expanded setting (or between other settings) and the effective thickness of the dynamic tactile layer becomes non-uniform over its breadth, refraction of light through the dynamic tactile layer also becomes non-uniform, thereby yielding distortion of an image rendered on the digital display as offsets between real and perceived position of points across the rendered image vary. For example, a user may perceive greater optical distortion of light output from a third point on the digital display, the third point at a distance from the first point greater than a distance between the first point and the second point.
Furthermore, light output from the digital display proximal the second point may exhibit greater internal reflection than light output from the digital display proximal the first point, thereby resulting in perceived lower intensity of light output at the second point compared to light output at the first point. Varying thickness of the dynamic tactile layer across its breadth due to expansion of one or more deformable regions may further yield non-uniform internal reflection of light output from the digital display and thus perception of non-uniform light intensity across the display. Similarly, a surface roughness of the tactile surface across a deformable region may be affected by a position of the deformable region, such as particularly along a junction between the deformable region and an adjacent peripheral region of the tactile surface, which may change how the tactile layer scatters and/or diffuses light transmitted through the tactile layer. Diffusion of light through the tactile layer may also be dependent on an angle of incidence of light—output from the display—onto a boundary between the display and the substrate and/or onto a boundary between the substrate and the tactile layer.
Light output from the digital display proximal the second point may also exhibit greater chromatic dispersion or other optical effects than light output from the digital display proximal the first point, resulting in further perceived optical distortion of the second point compared to the first point. In particular, the substrate, the fluid, the tactile layer, the display, and/or air may exhibit difference indices of refractions for light across the visible spectrum such that light transmitted from the digital display through the dynamic tactile layer may bend by different degrees for various wavelengths the light, thereby separating light output from the digital display by wavelength. Such effect may be substantially minimal across planar regions of the tactile surface but may be relatively significant and perceptible at a junction between a peripheral region and a deformable region.
Therefore, differences between average and/or wavelength-specific refractive indices of various materials of the dynamic tactile interface and the digital display, geometries (e.g., thicknesses) of and offsets between materials within the dynamic tactile layer and the display, orientation of the components of the dynamic tactile layer and the digital display (e.g., orientation of pixels in the digital display relative to a fluid channel within the dynamic tactile layer), etc. can yield non-uniform chromatic dispersion of different wavelengths of light output from the digital display and variations in degree and/or type of perceived optical distortion of light emitted across the digital display.
In one implementation, the method S100 models (or predicts, estimates) a user's perception of optical distortion of light emitted from each particular point (e.g., pixel or group of pixels) on the digital display based on an angle(s) and a distance from the user's eyes to each particular point on the digital display. For example, the method S100 can select a particular point on the digital display through which a line normal to the dominant face of the digital display can be drawn to the (center of the) user's eyes and define this particular point as a point of minimal perceived optical distortion of the digital display on the digital display and set this particular point as an anchor point. In this example, the method S100 can then apply a known geometry (e.g., width, length) of the digital display and/or of the dynamic tactile interface to estimate an angle and a distance of the user's eyes to each other point across the digital display (such as based on an orientation of the computing device) and to model perceived optical distortion of light emitted from these points according to these angles, these distances, and a current profile of the tactile surface. As described below, Block S140 (and Block S110) can thus implement such information to modify the displayed image to reduce perceived optical distortion of the image rendered across the digital display.
Furthermore, a shape and/or height (e.g., vertical position, internal or external radius of curvature) of a deformable region of the tactile layer can also affect types of optical distortion (i.e., reflection, refraction, diffraction, chromatic dispersion, etc.) that occur across the dynamic tactile layer by locally altering an effective thickness to the dynamic tactile layer and/or by introducing new material (e.g., fluid) into the dynamic tactile layer. As described below, Block S140 can further modify the image rendered on the digital display according to a known position, shape, height, etc. of one or more deformable regions of the tactile layer to reduce perception of non-uniform optical distortion across the deformable region(s). For example, Block S140 can implement one or more techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/896,090 to detect a height and/or shape of a deformable region based on an output of a capacitive touch sensor coupled to the dynamic tactile layer. Block S140 can also modify an image rendered on the digital display according to optical properties of the fluid, optical properties of the tactile layer under different strains or deformations, etc. to render an image—which yields a reduced perception of optical distortion by the dynamic tactile layer—on the display.
Therefore, perceived optical distortion of an image rendered on the digital display can be dependent on an angle between the user's eyes and points across the digital display, a distance from the user's eyes to the points across the digital display, and/or an orientation of the digital display relative to the user. Block S110 can therefore function to render an initial image, Block S120 can function to collect, predict, and/or estimate user eye position data, Block S130 can function to control a profile of the tactile surface of the dynamic tactile layer, and Block S140 can function to update or modify the image based on (a change in) the position of the user and/or (a change in) the profile of the tactile surface to compensate for changes corresponding actual or perceived changes in refraction, diffraction reflections, etc. of light output from the display.
5. Viewing Position
Block S120 of the method S100 recites estimating a viewing position of a user relative to the digital display. Block S120 functions to detect an angle (e.g., in each of two lanes) and/or a distance of the user's eyes to one or more points on the digital display, such as to each pixel or cluster of adjacent pixels of the display. Block S120 can also detect the user's point of focus on the digital display, the orientation of the computing device (and the dynamic tactile interface) relative to the user's eyes or to gravity, etc.
In one implementation, Block S120 interfaces with a forward-facing camera adjacent the digital display within the computing device to capture (or retrieve) a photographic image of the user viewing the digital display, and Block S120 further implement machine vision (e.g., objection recognition) and/or machine learning techniques to identify the user's eyes in the photographic image. Once the user's eyes (or pupils, cheekbones, eyelids, and/or eyebrows, etc. or an outline of the user's head, etc.) are identified in the photographic image, Block S120 can estimate a real distance between the user's eyes and the camera. For example, Block S120 can count a number of pixels between the centers of the user's pupils as shown in the photographic image, predict a real pupil center distance of the user, and calculate a real distance from the camera to the user's eyes based on the number of pixels between the user's pupils and the predicted real pupil center distance of the user, such as according to a parametric function specific to the camera arranged within the computing device. In this example, Block S120 can process the photographic image of the user to detect an age, gender, and/or ethnicity, etc. of the user and then generate a prediction for the real pupil center distance of the user based on these data based on a parametric function, a lookup table, etc. Alternatively, Block S120 can apply a static (i.e., preset) estimated real distance between eyes of users to estimate the distance between the user's eyes and the camera. Yet alternatively, Block S120 can implement a standard viewing distance for the computing device to estimate the user's viewing position relative to the camera. For example, for the computing device that includes a smartphone (or other computing device with a display less than sixteen square inches in size), Block S120 can apply a typical viewing distance of twelve inches between a user's eyes and a surface of the smartphone in determining the user's viewing position. In another example, for the computing device that includes a tablet (or other computing device with a display between sixteen and 100 square inches in size), Block S120 can apply a typical viewing distance of fifteen inches between a user's eyes and a surface of the smartphone in determining the user's viewing position. In yet another example, for the computing device that includes a laptop (or other computing device with a display between 100 and 200 square inches in size), Block S120 can apply a typical viewing distance of eighteen inches between a user's eyes and a surface of the smartphone in determining the user's viewing position. However, Block S120 can function in any other way to calculate, predict, or estimate a distance between the user's eyes and the camera (or digital display or other surface) of the computing device.
In this implementation, Block S120 can also estimate (e.g., calculate, extrapolate) an angle between the user's eyes and the camera along one or more axes based on a location of the user's eyes within the image. For example, Block S120 can (effectively) apply a virtual crosshatch centered on the photographic image (and corresponding to perpendicular centerlines of a lens of the camera), and Block S120 can determine that the user's viewing angle is 0° about a horizontal axis of the camera if a virtual horizontal centerline extending across the user's pupils within the photographic image lies substantially over a horizontal line of the virtual crosshatch, and Block S120 can determine that the user's viewing angle is 0° about a vertical axis of the camera if a vertical centerline centered between the user's pupils within the photographic image lies substantially over a vertical line of the virtual crosshatch, as shown in
However, as in this implementation, Block S120 can also determine one or more non-normal viewing angles of the user relative to the camera. For example, Block S120 can also interface with a gyroscope and/or accelerometer within the computing device (shown in
Block S120 can also determine the user's viewing angle about the vertical axis of the camera. For example, Block S120 can implement the detected orientation of the camera relative to the user to determine that the user's viewing angle about the vertical axis of the camera is less than 0° if the virtual vertical centerline between the user's pupils within the photographic image lies to the right of the vertical line of the virtual crosshatch applied to the photographic image, and Block S120 can determine that the user's viewing angle about the vertical axis of the camera is greater than 0° if the centerline between the user's pupils lies to the left of the vertical line of the virtual crosshatch in the photographic image. Therefore, Block S120 can estimate the yaw of the user relative to the center point of the camera and about a vertical axis of the camera based on a position of the user's eyes within the photographic image.
Therefore, as in this implementation, Block S120 can estimate angles between the user's eyes and the camera along two perpendicular axes based on the position of the user's eyes within a photographic image, as shown in
Block S120 can also set positive and negative directions for the user's viewing angle relative to the camera along the horizontal and vertical planes based on the orientation of computing device and/or the orientation of the user to the camera, and Block S120 can also define horizontal and vertical planes of the camera based on the orientation of computing device and/or the orientation of the user to the camera. For example, Block S120 can implement machine vision techniques, as described above, to identify the user's eyes and a second feature of the user within the photographic image of the user, detect a “roll” or angular position of the user relative to the camera based on the position of the eyes and the second feature of the user within the photographic image, and then define the horizontal and vertical planes of the camera according to the angular position of the user to the camera (i.e., not parallel to short and long sides of the computing device, an optical sensor within the camera, and/or the photographic image). Specifically, Block S120 can function as described above to detect an angular position of the user's eyes about an axis extending outward from (and normal to) the camera, and Block S120 can further define axes of the camera (and the computing device or the photographic image) according to the angular position of the user.
Block S120 can further transform the distance between the camera and the user's eyes, a known position of the camera relative to the digital display, the angle of the user's eyes about the horizontal axis of the camera, and/or the angle of the user's eyes about the vertical axis of the camera, etc. into user viewing angles at discrete positions (e.g., points, discrete areas) across the digital display. For example, as shown in
In another implementation, Block S120 can interface with a speaker within the computing device to output a low-frequency sound and then interface with a microphone within the computing device to receive reflected sounds originating from the speaker. Block S120 can then implement sonic imaging techniques to generate a virtual map of the user's facial futures (e.g., nose, eye sockets, forehead) and to estimate the angle and/or distance of the user's eyes to a reference point on the computing device (e.g., the microphone). Block S120 can then calculate the user's viewing angle (i.e., viewing position) relative to each pixel, group of pixels, or other regions across the digital display, such as based on known dimensions of the computing device, known dimensions of the digital display, and/or known dimensions of the dynamic tactile layer within the computing device. For example, Block S120 can generate a reference position matrix including the angle and/or distance of the user's eyes to the reference point on the computing device, cross the position matrix with a display region matrix (e.g., specifying the location of each pixel of the digital display relative to the reference point), and thus generate a viewing position matrix specifying viewing angles for each region of the digital display, shown in
Block S120 can also implement eye-tracking methods to identify the user's current point of focus on the digital display. However, Block S120 can interface with any other component within, coupled to, or in communication with the computing device and can implement any other method or technique to determine the viewing position of the user relative to the digital display. Block S120 can also calculate the user's viewing position substantially in real-time and can update continuously—such as at a sampling rate of 10 Hz—to capture changes in the user's viewing position relative to the computing device (or to the digital display, to the dynamic tactile layer, and/or to the camera, etc.)
5. Deformable Region
Block S130 of the method S100 recites transitioning the deformable region from a retracted setting into an expanded setting. Generally, Block S130 functions to alter the position of one or more deformable regions of the dynamic tactile interface, thereby transiently creating a tactile formation across the tactile surface of the dynamic tactile layer (and over the digital display).
In one implementation in which the deformable region cooperates with the substrate of the dynamic tactile layer to define a cavity and in which the cavity is coupled to a displacement device via a fluid channel, Block S130 can control the displacement device (e.g., a positive displacement pump) to displace fluid from a reservoir, through the fluid channel, and into the cavity, thereby expanding the tactile layer at the deformable region to a offset above the tactile surface at the peripheral region. Block S130 can further interface with the displacement device (or with multiple displacement devices) to transition multiple deformable regions from the retracted setting to the expanded setting in unison, such as a set of deformable regions arranged over a virtual alphanumeric keyboard rendered on the digital display below to provide tactile guidance to the user as the user enters text into the computing device. Block S130 can therefore implement techniques and/or interface with components as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/481,676, filed on 25 May 2012, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.
In this implementation, Block S130 can control the displacement device to displace a preset volume of fluid into the fluid channel fluidly coupled to the cavity cooperatively defined by the substrate and the deformable region to expand the deformable region to a target height offset above the peripheral region. For example, Block S130 can displace 0.2 mL of fluid into the fluid channel to transition the deformable region to a known three-dimensional convex profile at a known maximum height above the peripheral region (e.g., 1.8 mm), such as at a known external radius of curvature. Block S130 can also track or measure a volume of fluid displaced into the dynamic tactile layer and then calculate a profile across the tactile surface based on this volume of fluid, an elasticity or other mechanical property of the tactile layer, and a known position and footprint of each expanded deformable region defined in the dynamic tactile layer. For example, Block S130 can implement a lookup table to access a stored surface profile model of the dynamic tactile layer based on a volume of fluid pumped into the dynamic tactile layer. In another example, Block S130 can execute a parametric model to calculate the profile across the tactile surface based on the foregoing parameters. Yet alternatively, Block S130 can interface with a capacitive touch sensor coupled to the dynamic tactile layer to detect a vertical position of discrete positions across the tactile layer, such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/896,090.
However, Block S130 can function in any other way and can control any other component within the computing device to transition the deformable region from the retracted setting to the expanded setting and to monitor a profile of the tactile surface.
6. Image Modification
Block S140 of the method S100 recites modifying the portion of the image rendered on the digital display according to the estimated viewing position of the user and a profile of the tactile surface across the deformable region in the expanded setting. Generally, Block S140 functions to modify the image rendered on the digital display based on the viewing position of the user relative to (discrete positions across) the digital display and the profile of the tactile surface of the dynamic tactile layer to compensate for optical distortion of the image transmitted through the dynamic tactile layer to the user. In particular, Block S140 functions to modify the image to reduce the user's perception of distortion of the image rendered on the digital display.
As described above, differences in the indices of refraction of various materials of the dynamic tactile layer and the digital display and variations in the effective thickness of the dynamic tactile layer (i.e., between peripheral regions and deformable regions of the tactile layer) may yield optical distortion of an image rendered on the digital display across all regions of the digital display except a single point (i.e., pixel) in direct (i.e., normal) line of sight of the user. In particular, when the user views a ray of light—transmitted through the dynamic tactile layer—at an acute angle (i.e., a non-normal angle) between the user's eyes and the digital display, the user may perceive an origin (e.g., pixel) of the ray of light that is other than the true origin of the ray of light due to the thickness of the dynamic tactile layer that is arranged over the digital display. However, the distance between the true origin of a ray of light and the perceived origin of the ray of light may depend on an effective thickness of the dynamic tactile layer (and an effective thickness and material property of each of the substrate, fluid, and tactile layer of the dynamic tactile layer) such that the dynamic tactile layer with expanded deformable regions distorts an image rendered on the digital display. In one example, the tactile surface at the deformable region is substantially flush (i.e., in-plane) with the tactile surface at the peripheral region in the retracted setting, and the tactile surface at the deformable region is elevated (or offset) above the peripheral region when the deformable region transitions into the expanded setting. Thus, in the expanded setting, the deformable region can define a portion of the dynamic tactile layer of a (varying and) greater effective thickness relative to a portion of the dynamic tactile interface at the peripheral region. In this example, dissimilarity between the refractive index of materials of the dynamic tactile interface and air around the computing device can thus yield a greater distance between a perceived origin of a first ray of light and the true origin of the first ray of light transmitted through the deformable region in the expanded setting than for a second ray of light transmitted through the peripheral region for an equivalent viewing position of the user. For example, the dynamic tactile layer can exhibit a lensing effect locally across the deformable region in the expanded setting, thereby preferentially distorting light emitted from the digital display proximal the deformable region over light emitted from the digital display proximal the peripheral region. In particular, the user's viewing angle (and distance) to a region of the digital display (the “source”) adjacent the deformable region (the “lens”) can affect the user's perception of light emitted from the digital display (even if the user views the digital display at an angle of substantially co). Furthermore, as described above, the deformable region can be transitioned to various heights above (and/or below) the peripheral region, and the height and shape (i.e., “profile”) of the deformable region in the expanded setting can further affect distortion of light through the dynamic tactile layer and therefore the user's perception of an image rendered on the digital display.
Therefore, in one implementation, Block S140 can modify the image rendered on the digital display (or render a second image based on the original image on the digital display) to compensate for a non-uniform optical distortion (e.g., refraction) of light transmitted through the dynamic tactile layer due to a change in the position of one or more deformable regions. For example, Block S140 can update the image as a deformable region of the dynamic tactile layer transitions from the retracted setting into the expanded setting to compensate for a local difference in optical distortion of light transmitted from the digital display to the user's eyes through the deformable region. In another example, Block S140 updates the image as a deformable region transitions from the expanded setting into the retracted setting to compensate for a return to more uniform optical distortion of light transmitted through the dynamic tactile layer. In another implementation, Block S140 can modify the image rendered on the digital display to compensate for a change in the user's viewing position relative to the digital display to compensate for non-uniform optical distortion of light transmitted through the dynamic tactile layer due to a non-uniform surface profile of the dynamic tactile layer. Block S140 can therefore update, modify, or replace an image rendered on the digital display in response to a change in position of a deformable region of the dynamic tactile layer and/or based on a change in a viewing position of the user relative to the digital display (when one or more deformable regions of the dynamic tactile layer is in a position other than flush with the peripheral region). Therefore, as in these implementations, Block S140 can translate and/or scale regions of the image rendered on the digital display, such as shown in
In one implementation, Block S110 displays a frame of a messaging application—including alphanumeric keys of an alphanumeric keyboard—on a digital display integrated into a computing device (e.g., a smartphone, a tablet, an other mobile computing device), and Block S120 determines that the user is holding the computing device in a landscape orientation based on an output of a gyroscope and/or accelerometer integrated into the computing device, sets a viewing center for the user at the effective center of the output surface of the digital display, and selects a preset user viewing distance of twelve inches from the output surface of the digital display. Block S130 then transitions select deformable regions of the dynamic tactile interface into the expanded setting, each of the select deformable regions adjacent an alphanumeric key rendered on the digital display, and Block S140 horizontally shrinks a portion of the rendered image corresponding to the alphanumeric keyboard with the portion of the image anchored at the effective center of the digital display and the magnitude of the horizontal expansion of the image corresponding to the user's viewing distance. For example, Block S140 can leave a first alphanumeric key proximal the user's viewing center in a substantially unchanged position in the second image, translate a second alphanumeric key laterally adjacent the first alphanumeric key horizontally away from the first alphanumeric key by a first distance in the second image, and translate a third alphanumeric key—laterally adjacent the second alphanumeric key opposite the first alphanumeric key—horizontally away from the second alphanumeric key by a second distance greater than the first distance in the second image. In particular, in this implementation, Block S140 can scale the image horizontally from an anchor point of the image that is set based on a preset (or predicted) user viewing center. Thus, in this implementation, Block S140 can adjust the image to accommodate predicted refraction effects of various deformable regions arranged across the digital display based on a static preset user viewing distance and/or user viewing center.
In the foregoing implementation, Block S120 can alternatively interface with a forward-facing camera integrated into the computing device to capture in photographic image, analyze the photographic image as described above to identify a user viewing distance relative to a reference point on the computing device. In the foregoing implementation, Block S140 can apply the predicted user viewing distance to set a horizontal scaling magnitude corresponding to the user's viewing distance and thus scale the image rendered on the digital display relative to a scaling anchor point (based on a predicted user viewing center) substantially in real-time. Block S140 can therefore apply a linear scaling (and/or or translation) value or a non-linear scaling (and/or or translation) model to the image to shift portions of the image to compensate for the user's viewing position relative to the dynamic tactile layer and the position of one or more deformable regions across the tactile surface.
As described above and shown in
In another implementation, Block S140 can scale and/or transform only regions of the displayed image substantially adjacent a deformable region in an elevated position (i.e., in an expanded setting). For example, the tactile surface at the deformable region can define a three-dimensional convex domed geometry in the expanded setting, and Block S140 can translate a corresponding alphanumeric key displayed adjacent the deformable region such that a ray traced from the center of the corresponding alphanumeric key to the user's eyes (e.g., to the center of the bridge of the user's nose) passes through the deformable region normal to the tactile surface, such as shown in
Block S140 can implement similar techniques to select and/or generate a scaling matrix for one or more regions of the displayed image. For example, as described above, the deformable region in the expanded setting can define a three-dimensional convex domed geometry—mimicking a lens—over a region of the digital display such that the deformable region magnifies an adjacent region of an image rendered on the digital display. In particular, the magnification power of the deformable region in the expanded setting can be based on the shape (e.g., the vertical height, perimeter geometry, attachment geometry, optical and mechanical material properties, etc.) of the deformable region, a distance between the tactile layer and an output surface of the digital display, and the user's viewing angle (and distance) to the deformable region, etc. Block S140 can thus accommodate for such variables to scale a portion of the region of the image adjacent the deformable region to compensate for magnification of the portion of the image by the expanded deformable region. Block S140 can therefore estimate a three-dimensional surface profile of the tactile layer across the deformable region in the expanded setting (e.g., based on a magnitude of a volume of fluid displaced into the dynamic tactile layer), estimating a non-uniform magnification of the digital display across the portion of the image by the deformable region in the expanded setting based on the estimated three-dimensional surface profile, and non-uniformly scale the portion of the image, rendered on the digital display, to compensate for the non-uniform magnification of the digital display by the deformable region in the expanded setting.
In an example of the foregoing implementation, Block S110 includes rendering—on a digital display within a mobile computing device—a first images of a locked home screen with a set of icons, each original icon in the set of icons corresponding to a native application installed on the mobile computing device. In this implementation, when the mobile computing device is unlocked, Block S130 expands a set of deformable regions into expanded settings, each deformable region adjacent an original icon rendered on the display, and Block S140 generate a second image (or “frame”) including scaled and translated versions of the icons (“second icons”) based on the user's viewing position relative to the mobile computing device and renders the second image on the digital display such that the second icons appear to the user as substantially undistorted and substantially centered on corresponding deformable regions—substantially regardless of the user's viewing position—as the deformable regions expand. For example, for each first icon, Block S140 can set a scaling value for the first icon based on a vertical position of the corresponding (i.e., adjacent) deformable region in the expanded setting, set a translation magnitude value and a translation direction for the first icon based on a vertical position of the corresponding deformable region in the expanded setting and the estimated viewing position of the user relative to the corresponding deformable region, and then apply the scaling value uniformly across the first icon and translate the first icon according to the translation magnitude and the translation angle in the first image to generate the second image.
Furthermore, in the second image, Block S140 can shift to black a set of pixels in the digital display corresponding to an area of a first icon excluding an area of an intersection of the first icon and the second icon as rendered on the digital display, as shown in
In one variation, Block S130 retracts the deformable region from the expanded setting in which the deformable region is substantially flush with the peripheral region to the retracted setting below the peripheral region such that the deformable demagnifies an adjacent portion of the image. In this variation, Block S140 can thus expand the adjacent portion of the image to compensate for a user's perceived demagnification of the portion of the image by the deformable region in the retracted setting. In one example, Block S140 can (linearly or nonlinearly) expand an image of an icon rendered on the display adjacent the deformable region to compensate for the transition of the deformable region into the retracted setting, such as by expanding the image of the icon over a background color or background pattern rendered on the display.
Therefore, Block S140 can prioritize one or more portions of the image rendered on the display for modification to compensate for optical distortion of the image due to a non-planar three-dimensional profile of the tactile surface. For example, Block S140 select prioritize icons for native applications on a home screen rendered on the display or icons for alphanumeric keys rendered on the display for scaling and/or translation to compensate for a varying thickness and/or material compensation of the dynamic tactile layer.
In another implementation, Block S120 generates a reference position matrix including the angle and distance of the user's eyes to a reference point on the computing device, as described above, and Block S120 crosses the reference position matrix with a display region matrix (e.g., specifying the location of each pixel of the digital display relative to the reference point) to generate a viewing position matrix specifying the user's viewing angle(s) for each portion (e.g., pixel, cluster of pixels) across the digital display, as shown in
As shown in
Block S130 can therefore select or generate a geometry matrix defining a profile of the tactile surface for the deformable region in the expanded setting for each discrete position (e.g., discrete area) in a set of discrete positions across the tactile surface, and Block S140 can transform the (original) image rendered on the digital display according to the viewing position matrix and the geometry matrix to generate a second image and then rendering the second image on the digital display. Block S130 can therefore generate the geometry matrix defining an effective thickness of the tactile layer across the peripheral region and the set of deformable region in the expanded setting for each discrete position in the set of discrete positions, and Block S140 can transform the (original) image into the second image further based on an index of refraction of the tactile layer and an index of refraction of a fluid arranged between the deformable region and the substrate.
Block S140 can further map virtual pixels the second image to real pixels in the digital display. In particular, in translating and/or scaling the original image to generate the updated second image, Block S140 can translate a virtual pixel of the original image to a virtual position within the second image corresponding to a nearest real pixel of the digital display. However, Block S140 can map scaled and/or translated portions of the original image to real positions of pixels of the digital display to generate the second image in any other suitable way.
Block S140 can also apply any of the viewing position matrix, the tactile surface position matrix, the optical properties matrix, and/or the geometry matrix to generate a light level matrix, and Block S140 can implement the light level matrix to adjust the brightness of one or more regions of the image to accommodate for internal reflection and/or other optical effects that reduce perceived light intensity across one or more regions of the image due to a change in a position of a deformable region and/or a shift in the user's viewing position relative to the digital display. However, Block S140 can function in any other way to modify the image to reduce, limit, compensate for, and/or substantially eliminate perceived optical distortion of an image rendered on the digital display.
In one implementation, Block S140 selects a transfer matrix from a set of stored transfer matrices, wherein each transfer matrix in the set of stored transfer matrices is based on empirical optical data. For example, empirical optical data can be generated by displaying an image (e.g., a black and white grid) on a display of a test dynamic tactile interface, transitioning one or more deformable regions of the test dynamic tactile interface between vertical elevations (e.g., fully expanded, partially expanded, fully retracted), moving a camera to various positions (e.g., different angles and distances) over the digital display, and capturing a photographic image of all or a portion of the digital display at each camera position and at various deformable region elevations. Each photographic image can then be compared to the displayed image (of known two-dimensional content) to generate a matrix approximating perceived optical distortion of an image rendered on the digital display as captured by a camera (like a human user) at a corresponding position over the digital display and for a known elevation of the deformable region(s). Each perceived optical distortion matrix can then be manipulated (e.g., inverted) to generate a transfer matrix corresponding to a particular user viewing position relative to the digital display and to an elevation of each deformable region. A set of such transfer matrices corresponding to various viewing positions and deformable region elevations can thus be uploaded to and stored on the dynamic tactile interface. Block S140 can thus receive a user viewing position from Block S120 and a deformable region elevation from Block S130, and Block S140 can select a particular transfer matrix—from the set of stored transfer matrices—that best matches the received user viewing position and the received deformable region elevation(s). Block S140 can then apply the select transfer matrix to an image currently rendered on the digital display to generate a new image that compensates for optical distortion of the image by the dynamic tactile layer and/or that compensates for a shift in the users viewing position relative to he digital display.
In the foregoing implementation, Block S140 can alternatively (linearly) interpolate a composite transfer matrix based on two or more stored transfer matrices corresponding to user viewing positions and/or deformable region elevations similar to (e.g., “near”) the current user viewing position as determined in Block S120 and the deformable region elevation(s) set in Block S130. Block S140 can thus apply a ‘stock’ transfer matrix or a composite (e.g., interpolated) transfer matrix—based on multiple stock transfer matrices—to an image currently rendered on the digital display to reduce perceived optical distortion of the image by the user. However, Block S140 can function in any other way and/or apply any other suitable technique or method to modify the image displayed on the digital display.
7. Variations
In one variation of the method S100, Block S110 includes rendering the image on the digital display at a first time, Block S130 includes transitioning the deformable region into the expanded setting over a period of time succeeding the first time, the period of time terminating in a second time, and Block S120 includes cyclically refreshing an image rendered on the digital display according to a position of the deformable region over the peripheral region during the period of time. Generally, in this variation, the method S100 can cyclically detect the user's viewing position and update an image rendered on the digital display of the computing device to compensate for optical distortion of the image transmitted through the dynamic tactile layer, which may include one or more deformable region in expanded settings (i.e., in positions other than flush with the peripheral region).
In one example, Block S140 predicts a first perceived parallax of each pixel in the digital display by the user at a first time for the deformable region in the retracted setting, predicts a second perceived parallax of each pixel in the digital display by the user at a second time succeeding the first time for the deformable region in the expanded setting, and modifies the image to compensate for a change in perceived parallax of each pixel of the digital display from the first perceived parallax to the second perceived parallax. In a similar example, Block S130 includes transitioning the deformable region into the expanded setting at a first time, Block S110 includes rendering the image on the digital display substantially at the first time, Block S120 includes estimating a first viewing position of the user relative to the digital display substantially at the first time and estimating a second viewing position of the user relative to the digital display different from the first viewing position at a second time succeeding the first time, and Block S140 includes refreshing the image rendered on the digital display according to a difference between the first viewing position and the second viewing position.
Blocks S120 and S140 can thus repeat this process cyclically, such as at a refresh rate of the digital display, an image capture rate of a camera arranged within the computing device, or at an other preset rate, (e.g., 10 Hz), etc. For example, Block S140 can refreshing a transfer matrix—implemented as described above to adjust an image rendered on the digital display and defining transformation of images rendered on the digital display based on an estimated position of the user relative to the digital display—at the refresh rate. In this example, Block S140 can estimate a first perceived parallax of the image at the first time based on the first set of viewing angles at a set of discrete positions across the digital display, estimate a second perceived parallax of the image at the second time based on a second set of viewing angles of the user to the set of discrete positions across the digital display, and translate and scale a portion of the image to compensate for a difference between the first perceived parallax and the second perceived parallax. However, in this variation, Blocks S110, S120, S130, and S140 can repeat at any other rate and cooperate in any other way to adjust an image rendered on the digital display to compensate for a change in the user's viewing position and/or a position of one or more deformable regions within the dynamic tactile layer, which may other yield perception—by the user—of optical distortion of the image rendered on the display.
In another variation, the digital display includes in-pixel photodetectors configured to output signals corresponding to incident light on the digital display. In this variation, Block S140 can implement signals output from the in-pixel photodetectors to sense internal reflectance and/or other optical effects within the digital display and/or within the dynamic tactile interface. Block S140 can thus interface with the in-pixel photodetectors to measure local optical effects (e.g., internal reflection) within the digital display and/or within the dynamic tactile interface based on outputs of the in-pixel photodetectors, and Block S140 can calibrate an algorithm or any of the foregoing matrices based on these measured optical effects. For example, Block S140 can interface with the in-pixel photodetector to calibrate a retracted setting algorithm and/or matrix defining internal reflection of light across the dynamic tactile layer-digital display assembly for a set of deformable regions in the retracted setting and to similarly calibrate an expanded setting algorithm and/or matrix defining internal reflection of light across the dynamic tactile layer-digital display assembly for a set of deformable regions in the expanded setting. In this example, Block S140 can then adjust a brightness across an image rendered on the digital display based on a difference between the expanded setting algorithm and/or matrix and the retracted setting algorithm and/or matrix as the set of deformable regions transitions from the retracted setting into the expanded setting. However, the method S100 can function in any other way to reduce perceived optical distortion of light output through a dynamic tactile interface.
The systems and methods of the embodiments can be embodied and/or implemented at least in part as a machine configured to receive a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions can be executed by computer-executable components integrated with the application, applet, host, server, network, website, communication service, communication interface, native application, frame, iframe, hardware/firmware/software elements of a user computer or mobile device, or any suitable combination thereof. Other systems and methods of the embodiments can be embodied and/or implemented at least in part as a machine configured to receive a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions. The instructions can be executed by computer-executable components integrated by computer-executable components integrated with apparatuses and networks of the type described above. The computer-readable medium can be stored on any suitable computer readable media such as RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices (CD or DVD), hard drives, floppy drives, or any suitable device. The computer-executable component can be a processor, though any suitable dedicated hardware device can (alternatively or additionally) execute the instructions.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention as defined in the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2885967 | C et al. | May 1959 | A |
| 3034628 | Wadey | May 1962 | A |
| 3441111 | P | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3453967 | L et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3490733 | Jean | Jan 1970 | A |
| 3659354 | Sutherland | May 1972 | A |
| 3759108 | Borom et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3780236 | Gross | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3818487 | Brody et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 4109118 | Kley | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4181476 | Malbec | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4209819 | Seignemartin | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4290343 | Gram | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4307268 | Harper | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4467321 | Volnak | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4477700 | Balash et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4517421 | Margolin | May 1985 | A |
| 4543000 | Hasenbalg | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4584625 | Kellogg | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4700025 | Hatayama et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4743895 | Alexander | May 1988 | A |
| 4772205 | Chlumsky et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4920343 | Schwartz | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4940734 | Ley et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5090297 | Paynter | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5194852 | More et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5195659 | Eiskant | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5212473 | Louis | May 1993 | A |
| 5222895 | Fricke | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5286199 | Kipke | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5346476 | Elson | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5369228 | Faust | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5412189 | Cragun | May 1995 | A |
| 5459461 | Crowley et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5470212 | Pearce | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5488204 | Mead et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5496174 | Garner | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5666112 | Crowley et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5717423 | Parker | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5729222 | Iggulden et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5742241 | Crowley et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5754023 | Roston et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5766013 | Vuyk | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5767839 | Rosenberg | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5835080 | Beeteson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5880411 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889236 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5917906 | Thornton | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5943043 | Furuhata et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5977867 | Blouin | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5982304 | Selker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6067116 | Yamano et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6154198 | Rosenberg | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154201 | Levin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6160540 | Fishkin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169540 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6187398 | Eldridge | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6188391 | Seely et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6218966 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6243074 | Fishkin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6243078 | Rosenberg | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6268857 | Fishkin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6271828 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6278441 | Gouzman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6300937 | Rosenberg | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310614 | Maeda et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6323846 | Westerman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6337678 | Fish | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6354839 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6356259 | Maeda et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6359572 | Vale | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366272 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6369803 | Brisebois et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6384743 | Vanderheiden | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6414671 | Gillespie et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429846 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6437771 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6462294 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6469692 | Rosenberg | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6486872 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6498353 | Nagle et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6501462 | Garner | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6509892 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6529183 | Maclean et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6573844 | Venolia et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6636202 | Ishmael et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6639581 | Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6655788 | Freeman | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6657614 | Ito et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6667738 | Murphy | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6681031 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6683627 | Ullmann et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6686911 | Levin et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6697086 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6700556 | Richley et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6703924 | Tecu et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6743021 | Prince et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6788295 | Inkster | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6819316 | Schulz et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6850222 | Rosenberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6861961 | Sandbach et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6877986 | Fournier et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6881063 | Yang | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6930234 | Davis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937225 | Kehlstadt et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6975305 | Yamashita | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6979164 | Kramer | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6982696 | Shahoian | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6995745 | Boon et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004655 | Ferrara | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7015894 | Morohoshi | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7027032 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7056051 | Fiffie | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7061467 | Rosenberg | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7064655 | Murray et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7079111 | Ho | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7081888 | Cok et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7096852 | Gregorio | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7102541 | Rosenberg | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7104152 | Levin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7106305 | Rosenberg | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7106313 | Schena et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7109967 | Hioki et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7112737 | Ramstein | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7113166 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7116317 | Gregorio et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7124425 | Anderson, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7129854 | Arneson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7131073 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7136045 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7138977 | Kinerk et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7138985 | Nakajima | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143785 | Maerkl et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7144616 | Unger et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7148875 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7151432 | Tierling | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7151527 | Culver | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7151528 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7154470 | Tierling | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7158112 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7159008 | Wies et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7161276 | Face | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7161580 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7168042 | Braun et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7176903 | Katsuki et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7182691 | Schena | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7191191 | Peurach et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7193607 | Moore et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7195170 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7196688 | Schena | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7198137 | Olien | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7199790 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7202851 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7205981 | Cunningham | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7208671 | Chu | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7209028 | Boronkay et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7209113 | Park | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7209117 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7209118 | Shahoian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7210160 | Anderson, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7215326 | Rosenberg | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7216671 | Unger et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7218310 | Tierling et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7218313 | Marcus et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7233313 | Levin et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7233315 | Gregorio et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7233476 | Goldenberg et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7236157 | Schena et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7245202 | Levin | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7245292 | Custy | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7249951 | Bevirt et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7250128 | Unger et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7253803 | Schena et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7253807 | Nakajima | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7265750 | Rosenberg | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7280095 | Grant | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7283120 | Grant | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7283123 | Braun et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7283696 | Ticknor et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7289106 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7289111 | Asbill | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7307619 | Cunningham et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7308831 | Cunningham et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7319374 | Shahoian | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7336260 | Martin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7336266 | Hayward et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7339572 | Schena | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7339580 | Westerman et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7342573 | Ryynaenen | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7355595 | Bathiche et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7369115 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7382357 | Panotopoulos et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7390157 | Kramer | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7391861 | Levy | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7397466 | Bourdelais et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7403191 | Sinclair | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7432910 | Shahoian | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7432911 | Skarine | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7432912 | Cote et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7433719 | Dabov | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7453442 | Poynter | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7471280 | Prins | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7489309 | Levin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7511702 | Hotelling | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7522152 | Olien et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7545289 | Mackey et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7548232 | Shahoian et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7551161 | Mann | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7561142 | Shahoian et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7567232 | Rosenberg | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7567243 | Hayward | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7589714 | Funaki | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7592999 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7605800 | Rosenberg | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7609178 | Son et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7656393 | King et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7659885 | Kraus et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7671837 | Forsblad et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7679611 | Schena | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7679839 | Polyakov et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7688310 | Rosenberg | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7701438 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7728820 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7733575 | Heim et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7743348 | Robbins et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7755602 | Tremblay et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7808488 | Martin et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7834853 | Finney et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7843424 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7864164 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7869589 | Tuovinen | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7890257 | Fyke et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890863 | Grant et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7920131 | Westerman | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7924145 | Yuk et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7944435 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7952498 | Higa | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7956770 | Klinghult et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7973773 | Pryor | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7978181 | Westerman | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7978183 | Rosenberg et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7978186 | Vassallo et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7979797 | Schena | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7982720 | Rosenberg et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7986303 | Braun et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7986306 | Eich et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7989181 | Blattner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7999660 | Cybart et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8002089 | Jasso et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8004492 | Kramer et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8013843 | Pryor | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8020095 | Braun et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8022933 | Hardacker et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8031181 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8044826 | Yoo | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8047849 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8049734 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8059104 | Shahoian et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8059105 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8063892 | Shahoian et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8063893 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8068605 | Holmberg | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8077154 | Emig et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8077440 | Krabbenborg et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8077941 | Assmann | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8094121 | Obermeyer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8094806 | Levy | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8103472 | Braun et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8106787 | Nurmi | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8115745 | Gray | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8116831 | Meitzler et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8123660 | Kruse et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8125347 | Fahn | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8125461 | Weber et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8130202 | Levine et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8144129 | Hotelling et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8144271 | Han | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8154512 | Olien et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8154527 | Ciesla et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8159461 | Martin et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8162009 | Chaffee | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8164573 | Dacosta et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8166649 | Moore | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8169306 | Schmidt et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8169402 | Shahoian et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8174372 | Da Costa | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8174495 | Takashima et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8174508 | Sinclair et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8174511 | Takenaka et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8178808 | Strittmatter | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8179375 | Ciesla et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8179377 | Ciesla et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8188989 | Levin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8195243 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8199107 | Xu et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8199124 | Ciesla et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8203094 | Mittleman et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8203537 | Tanabe et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8207950 | Ciesla et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8212772 | Shahoian | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8217903 | Ma et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8217904 | Kim | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8223278 | Kim et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224392 | Kim et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8228305 | Pryor | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8232976 | Yun et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8243038 | Ciesla et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8253052 | Chen | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8253703 | Eldering | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8279172 | Braun et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8279193 | Birnbaum et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8310458 | Faubert et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8345013 | Heubel et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8350820 | Deslippe et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8362882 | Heubel et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8363008 | Ryu et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8367957 | Strittmatter | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8368641 | Tremblay et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8378797 | Pance et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8384680 | Paleczny et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8390594 | Modarres et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8390771 | Sakai et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8395587 | Cauwels et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8395591 | Kruglick | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8400402 | Son | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8400410 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8547339 | Ciesla | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8587541 | Ciesla et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8587548 | Ciesla et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8749489 | Ito et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8856679 | Sirpal et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8922503 | Ciesla et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8922510 | Ciesla et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8928621 | Ciesla et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8970403 | Ciesla et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9035898 | Ciesla | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9075429 | Karakotsios | Jul 2015 | B1 |
| 9116617 | Ciesla et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9128525 | Yairi et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9274612 | Ciesla et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9274635 | Birnbaum | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9372539 | Ciesla et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 20010008396 | Komata | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010043189 | Brisebois et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020063694 | Keely et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104691 | Kent et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020106614 | Prince et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020110237 | Krishnan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020125084 | Kreuzer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020149570 | Knowles et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180620 | Gettemy et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030087698 | Nishiumi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117371 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179190 | Franzen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030206153 | Murphy | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030223799 | Pihlaja | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001589 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040056876 | Nakajima | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040056877 | Nakajima | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106360 | Farmer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114324 | Kusaka et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040164968 | Miyamoto | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040178006 | Cok | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050007339 | Sato | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050007349 | Vakil et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050020325 | Enger et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050030292 | Diederiks | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050057528 | Kleen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050073506 | Durso | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050088417 | Mulligan | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110768 | Marriott et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050162408 | Martchovsky | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212773 | Asbill | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050231489 | Ladouceur et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050253816 | Himberg et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050270444 | Miller et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050285846 | Funaki | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060026521 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060026535 | Hotelling et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053387 | Ording | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060087479 | Sakurai et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060097991 | Hotelling et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098148 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060118610 | Pihlaja et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060119586 | Grant et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060152474 | Saito et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154216 | Hafez et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060197753 | Hotelling | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060214923 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060238495 | Davis | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060238510 | Panotopoulos et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060238517 | King et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256075 | Anastas et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060278444 | Binstead | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070013662 | Fauth | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036492 | Lee | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070085837 | Ricks et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070108032 | Matsumoto et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070122314 | Strand et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130212 | Peurach et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070152982 | Kim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070152983 | Mckillop et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070165004 | Seelhammer et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070171210 | Chaudhri et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070182718 | Schoener et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070229233 | Dort | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070229464 | Hotelling et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070236466 | Hotelling | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070236469 | Woolley et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070247429 | Westerman | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070257634 | Leschin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070273561 | Philipp | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296702 | Strawn et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296709 | Guanghai | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080010593 | Uusitalo et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080024459 | Poupyrev et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080054875 | Saito | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080062151 | Kent | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080136791 | Nissar | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080138774 | Ahn et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080143693 | Schena | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150911 | Harrison | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165139 | Hotelling et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080174321 | Kang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080174570 | Jobs et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080202251 | Serban et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080238448 | Moore et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080248836 | Caine | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080249643 | Nelson | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080251368 | Holmberg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080252607 | De et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080266264 | Lipponen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080286447 | Alden et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080291169 | Brenner et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080297475 | Woolf et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080303796 | Fyke | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312577 | Drasler et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080314725 | Karhiniemi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090002140 | Higa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090002205 | Klinghult et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090002328 | Ullrich et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090002337 | Chang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090009480 | Heringslack | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090015547 | Franz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090028824 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090033617 | Lindberg et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090059495 | Matsuoka | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090066672 | Tanabe et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085878 | Heubel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106655 | Grant et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090115733 | Ma et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090115734 | Fredriksson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128376 | Caine et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128503 | Grant et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129021 | Dunn | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132093 | Arneson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135145 | Chen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140989 | Ahlgren | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090160813 | Takashima et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090167508 | Fadell et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090167509 | Fadell et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090167567 | Halperin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090167677 | Kruse et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090167704 | Terlizzi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090174673 | Ciesla | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090174687 | Ciesla et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090181724 | Pettersson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182501 | Fyke et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195512 | Pettersson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090207148 | Sugimoto et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090215500 | You et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090231305 | Hotelling et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090243998 | Wang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090250267 | Heubel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090273578 | Kanda et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090289922 | Henry | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090303022 | Griffin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090309616 | Klinghult | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100043189 | Fukano | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100045613 | Wu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100073241 | Ayala et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100078231 | Yeh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100079404 | Degner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100097323 | Edwards et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103116 | Leung et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103137 | Ciesla et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100109486 | Polyakov et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121928 | Leonard | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141608 | Huang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142516 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162109 | Chatterjee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100171719 | Craig et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100171720 | Craig | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100171729 | Chun | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177050 | Heubel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100182135 | Moosavi | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100182245 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100225456 | Eldering | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100232107 | Dunn | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100237043 | Garlough | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238367 | Montgomery | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295820 | Kikin-Gil | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100296248 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298032 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100302199 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100321335 | Lim et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001613 | Ciesla et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110011650 | Klinghult | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110012851 | Ciesla et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110018813 | Kruglick | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029862 | Scott et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043457 | Oliver et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060998 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110074691 | Causey et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110102462 | Birnbaum | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110120784 | Osoinach et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110148793 | Ciesla et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110148807 | Fryer | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110157056 | Karpfinger | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110157080 | Ciesla et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110163978 | Park et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110175838 | Higa | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110175844 | Berggren | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110181530 | Park et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110193787 | Morishige et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110194230 | Hart et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110234502 | Yun | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241442 | Mittleman et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110242749 | Huang et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110248947 | Krahenbuhl et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110248987 | Mitchell | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110254672 | Ciesla | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110254709 | Ciesla et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110254789 | Ciesla et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120032886 | Ciesla et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120038583 | Westhues et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120043191 | Kessler et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120044277 | Adachi | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120056846 | Zaliva | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120062483 | Ciesla et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120080302 | Kim et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120098789 | Ciesla et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120105333 | Maschmeyer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120120357 | Jiroku | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120154324 | Wright et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120193211 | Ciesla et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120200528 | Ciesla et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120200529 | Ciesla et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120206364 | Ciesla et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218213 | Ciesla et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218214 | Ciesla et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120223914 | Ciesla et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235935 | Ciesla et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120242607 | Ciesla et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120306787 | Ciesla et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130019207 | Rothkopf et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130127790 | Wassvik | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130141118 | Guard | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130215035 | Guard | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130275888 | Williamson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140043291 | Ciesla et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140132532 | Yairi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140160044 | Yairi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140160063 | Yairi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140160064 | Yairi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140176489 | Park | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20150009150 | Cho et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150015573 | Burtzlaff | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150091834 | Johnson | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150091870 | Ciesla et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150138110 | Yairi et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150145657 | Levesque et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150205419 | Calub et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150293591 | Yairi et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1260525 | Jul 2000 | CN |
| 1530818 | Sep 2004 | CN |
| 1882460 | Dec 2006 | CN |
| 2000884 | Dec 2008 | EP |
| S63164122 | Jul 1988 | JP |
| 10255106 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| H10255106 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 2006268068 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2006285785 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2009064357 | Mar 2009 | JP |
| 2010039602 | Feb 2010 | JP |
| 2010072743 | Apr 2010 | JP |
| 2011508935 | Mar 2011 | JP |
| 20000010511 | Feb 2000 | KR |
| 100677624 | Jan 2007 | KR |
| 2004028955 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2006082020 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| 2009002605 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009044027 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009067572 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009088985 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2010077382 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2010078596 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2010078597 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2011003113 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2011087816 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| 2011087817 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| 2011112984 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011133604 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Essilor. “Ophthalmic Optic Files Materials,” Essilor International, Ser 145 Paris France, Mar. 1997, pp. 1-29, [retrieved on Nov. 18, 2014]. Retrieved from the internet. URL: <http://www.essiloracademy.eu/sites/default/files/9.Materials.pdf>. |
| Lind. “Two Decades of Negative Thermal Expansion Research: Where Do We Stand?” Department of Chemistry, the University of Toledo, Materials 2012, 5, 1125-1154; doi:10.3390/ma5061125, Jun. 20, 2012 (Jun. 20, 2012) pp. 1125-1154, [retrieved on Nov. 18, 2014]. Retrieved from the internet. URL: <https://www.google.com/webhp? sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=materials-05-01125.pdf>. |
| “Sharp Develops and Will Mass Produce New System LCD with Embedded Optical Sensors to Provide Input Capabilities Including Touch Screen and Scanner Functions,” Sharp Press Release, Aug. 31, 2007, 3 pages, downloaded from the Internet at: http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/070831.html. |
| Jeong et al., “Tunable Microdoublet Lens Array,” Optical Society of America, Optics Express; vol. 12, No. 11. May 31, 2004, 7 Pages. |
| Preumont, A. Vibration Control of Active Structures: An Introduction, Jul. 2011. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150177906 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61841176 | Jun 2013 | US |