Method for selecting implant components

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9888985
  • Patent Number
    9,888,985
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 22, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 13, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Methods of selecting or designing an implant to be used in a patient are provided. A CT scan of a patient's mouth is performed. A 3D CAD model of the patient's mouth is created utilizing data generated by the CT scan. Properties of the patient's mouth are determined based upon CT scan data and assigned to the 3D CAD model. A desired location for an implant is selected. A FEA simulation is performed on the 3D CAD model to choose an implant or to design an implant that optimizes a selected variable.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to implant systems for implants placed in bone. More particularly, the present invention relates to restoration components for dental implant systems and a computer model for selecting or developing an implant by optimizing at least one variable utilizing finite element analysis.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The dental restoration of a partially or wholly edentulous patient with artificial dentition is typically done in two stages. In the first stage, an incision is made through the gingiva to expose the underlying bone. An artificial tooth root, usually a dental implant, is placed in the jawbone for integration. The dental implant generally includes a threaded bore to receive a retaining screw holding mating components therein. During the first stage, the gum tissue overlying the implant is sutured and heals as the osseointegration process continues.


Once the osseointegration process is complete, the second stage is initiated. Here, the gum tissue is re-opened to expose the end of the dental implant. A healing component or healing abutment is fastened to the exposed end of the dental implant to allow the gum tissue to heal therearound. Preferably, the gum tissue heals such that the aperture that remains generally approximates the size and contour of the aperture that existed around the natural tooth that is being replaced. To accomplish this, the healing abutment attached to the exposed end of the dental implant has the same general contour as the gingival portion of the natural tooth being replaced.


During the typical second stage of dental restoration, the healing abutment is removed and an impression coping is fitted onto the exposed end of the implant. This allows an impression of the specific region of the patient's mouth to be taken so that an artificial tooth is accurately constructed. Thus, in typical dental implant systems, the healing component and the impression coping are two physically separate components. Preferably, the impression coping has the same gingival dimensions as the healing component so that there is no gap between the impression coping and the wall of the gum tissue defining the aperture. Otherwise, a less than accurate impression of the condition of the patient's mouth is made. The impression coping may be a “pick-up” type impression coping or a “transfer” type impression coping, both known in the art. After these processes, a dental laboratory creates a prosthesis to be permanently secured to the dental implant from the impression that was made.


More recently, single stage restoration have become more common, where an implant is placed in the patients mouth and a prosthesis is placed on this implant during the same procedure. Such a procedure typically reduces the number of visits a patient must make to a clinician, however, additional complications may occur in a patient during single stage restoration if an implant lacks proper initial stability. One way to help predict initial implant stability involves using finite element analysis (“FEA”) to attempt to predict effects of placing the implant into bone. These effects may include stress levels within the implant, stress levels in bone surrounding the implant, initial implant stability, torque required to seat an implant and many other factors. However, a real-time FEA simulation of the placement of an implant into bone has not been performed to date. Rather FEA simulations have only focused on the implant after it has already been placed into bone. Thus, a need exists for a method to accurately predict effects of placing an implant into bone.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one process, a method of selecting an implant to be used in a patient is provided that performs a CT scan of a patient's mouth. The method creates a 3D CAD model of the patient's mouth utilizing data generated by the CT scan. Properties of the patient's mouth are determined based upon data generated by the CT scan. The determined properties of the patient's mouth are assigned to the 3D CAD model. The method selects a desired location for the implant. The implant to be placed into the patient is selected. The method performs an FEA simulation of the selected implant being installed in the patient's mouth with the 3D CAD model. The method confirms the implant chosen by the act of selecting is clinically appropriate based upon the results of the FEA simulation of the 3D CAD model.


According to another process, a method of selecting an implant to be used in a patient is provided that performs a CT scan of the patient's mouth. A 3D CAD model of the patient's mouth is created utilizing data generated by the CT scan. The method determines properties of the patient's mouth based upon data generated by the CT scan. The determined properties of the patient's mouth are assigned to the 3D CAD model. The method selects a desired location for the implant. At least one variable to be optimized by a FEA simulation is assigned. The method performs an FEA simulation on the 3D CAD model to optimize the assigned variable. The method choosing the implant from a plurality of implants to use in the patient based upon results from the act of performing the FEA simulation.


According to a further process a method of designing an implant to be used in a patient is provided that performs a CT scan of the patient's mouth. The method creates a 3D CAD model of the patient's mouth utilizing data generated by the CT scan. Properties of the patient's mouth are determined based upon data generated by the CT scan. The determined properties of the patient's mouth are assigned to the 3D CAD model. The method selects a desired location for the implant. At least one variable to be optimized by a FEA simulation is assigned. The method performs a FEA simulation on the 3D CAD model to optimize the assigned variable. The implant to use in the patient is designed based upon results from the act of performing the FEA simulation.


According to yet another process, a method of verifying a FEA simulation used to select an implant is provided that creates a 3D CAD model of an actual calibration sample. Properties of the actual calibration sample are assigned to the 3D CAD model. The method performs an FEA simulation of placing the implant into the calibration sample on the 3D CAD model to generate FEA simulation data. An actual implant is placed into the actual calibration sample. The method collects measured data during the placement of the actual implant into the actual calibration sample. The measured data gathered during the act of collecting measured data is compared with the FEA simulation data generated by the act of performing the FEA simulation. The method ascertains whether the FEA simulation data accurately predicts the measured data. The method modifies FEA simulation variables if the act of ascertaining determines the FEA simulation does not accurately predict the measured data.


According to yet a further process, a method of selecting an implant to be used in a patient performs a CT scan of a region of the patient's body to contain the implant. A 3D CAD model of the region of the patient's body is created utilizing data generated by the CT scan. Properties of the region of the patient's body are determined based upon data generated by the CT scan. The method assigns the determined properties of the region of the patient's body to the 3D CAD model. A desired location for the implant is selected. The method selects the implant to be placed into the patient. An FEA simulation is performed of the selected implant being installed in the region of the patient's body with the 3D CAD model. The method confirms the implant chosen by the act of selecting is clinically appropriate based upon the results of the FEA simulation of the 3D CAD model.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a method according to one process for selecting a dental implant by utilizing a Finite Element Analysis (“FEA”) simulation;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a method according to another process for selecting a dental implant by utilizing a FEA simulation;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a method according to a further process for designing a dental implant by utilizing a FEA simulation;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a method according to one process for verifying a FEA simulation.





While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that it is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed but, on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.


DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

As shown in FIG. 1 a method 10 is shown to determine initial implant stability. As shown in block 12, a CT scan is performed on a patient. It is contemplated that various types of CT scans may be performed, such as Concentric CT scans or Cone-Beam CT scans. The CT scan produces data that may be used in forming a 3D CAD model of a patient's mouth within a CAD system as depicted in block 14. The CT scan allows a determination to be made regarding the type of bone found in the patient's mandible or maxilla where the implant is to be placed.


For example, the CT scan allows a practitioner to determine that Type I bone is present, a bone type that has almost all cortical bone tissue. Similarly, the CT scan may reveal that Type II, Type III, or Type IV bone is present at additional different planned implant locations. The various bone types have properties associated therewith, such as Type I bone being harder than Type IV bone. An implant being placed in Type I bone requires additional torque to seat the implant than an implant being placed in Type IV bone.


It is additionally contemplated that other technologies than CT scanning may be utilized to generate data used to form the 3D CAD model, such as ultrasonic scanning, MRI, or other scanning techniques.


Once the type, or types, of bone that implants will be placed in is determined, material properties for the bone may be assigned to the 3D CAD model of the patient's mouth, as shown in block 16.


The 3D CAD model of the patient's mouth allows a practitioner to determine locations to place the implants to be utilized, and also allows the practitioner to select particular implants to use on the patient. First, by analyzing the patient's particular anatomical structure, the practitioner determines desired locations for implants at block 18. Based on the patient's anatomical structure at the desired locations, a practitioner selects an implant to be placed within the patient at block 20. As the general ranges for material properties for Type I-Type IV bone are known, the 3D CAD model of the bones of the patient are assigned material properties at block 22. The assigning of material properties may be performed automatically by software based on the results of the CT scan, or a practitioner may analyze the CT scan and assign material properties to the 3D CAD model of the patient based on what is shown on the CT scan. Based on output from CT scan, such as the number of Hounsfield's units obtained from the CT scan, a bone type may be obtained.


The CAD system contains a library of dental implants and other restorative components that a practitioner may choose from when developing a treatment plan for a patient. As shown at block 24, the practitioner selects a proposed implant to use within a first implant site of the patient within the CAD system. The CAD system contains a library of dental implants, so that 3D models exist of the various implants that a practitioner may select. The selection of a proposed implant also causes the CAD system to create an osteotomy for the selected implant at the first implant site of the 3D CAD model.


As depicted in block 26, once the practitioner has selected a proposed implant, a finite element analysis (“FEA”) simulation is performed. The FEA simulation may evaluate placing the implant into a patient's bone, the implant and bone immediately after placement of the implant, and further may analyze the implant and bone after oseointegration occurs. Thus, the FEA simulation analyzes the characteristics and conditions of the implant and the bone as the implant is being placed into the bone, not just following the placement of the implant.


The FEA simulation of the implant placement analyzes the torque necessary to seat the implant into the bone. Based on the bone type present in the area around the implant site, as well as the characteristics of the implant and characteristic of the osteotomy, the amount of torque required to drive the implant into the bone is determined using the FEA simulation. After the simulation has determined the torque required to seat the implant within the bone, initial implant stability is analyzed. Knowing the amount of torque required to seat the implant is important, as using more torque than required to obtain a needed level of initial implant stability can generate more friction between the implant and the bone, which generates heat that can damage bone cells near the implant.


Initial implant stability is a measure of the stiffness of the connection between the bone and the dental implant, prior to osseointegration occurring. Initial implant stability can be used to determine how likely it is that the implant may loosen prior to osseointegration occurring. The higher the initial implant stability, the less likely the implant is to come loose. Factors that may influence initial implant stability, and that can be accounted for in the FEA simulation, include implant geometry, such as the thread design and implant size, bone type, and osteotomy properties, such as osteotomy geometry, whether the osteotomy has a counter sink, and whether the osteotomy is tapped.


Further, the FEA simulation may be used to calculate a resonant frequency of the implant and bone assembly, at the time of implantation. A resonant frequency analysis (“RFA”) allows a practitioner to track the osseointegration of the implant. As the implant is integrated into the bone, the resonant frequency changes, indicating to the practitioner how osseointegration is progressing.


The FEA simulation further may be used to analyze the stress and strain generated as the implant is placed in to the osteotomy. This analysis can be used to evaluate the stress and strain at the interface of the bone and the implant, as well as the stress and strain within the patient's bone. Thus, the FEA simulation allows a practitioner to determine the potential stress and strain that will exist within the patient as the implant is placed into the bone.


Thus, the FEA simulation allows a practitioner to evaluate many factors of a selected implant in a 3D virtual environment, prior to performing any surgical procedures on a patient. Thus, a practitioner may select an implant, virtually place the implant into the 3D model of the patient's bone, and perform an FEA simulation on the implant and the bone as the implant is being placed into the 3D model of the patient's bone.


From the FEA simulation, a practitioner may determine, as shown in block 28, whether the selected implant offers necessary initial implant stability without requiring too high a level of torque being needed to place the implant into the patient's bone and without placing too much stress or strain on the bone. If the practitioner determines that the FEA simulation indicates that the selected implant meets the patient's clinical needs and offers appropriate initial implant stability without producing too much stress or strain within the bone or at the bone and implant interface, the practitioner has verified that an acceptable implant has been selected.


If the selected implant is determined to not meet the patient's clinical needs, the practitioner selects a different implant, and repeats the process as shown in blocks 20-28 until an acceptable implant is found.


Once an acceptable implant is found, as shown in block 30, it is determined if there are any additional implant locations that need to be analyzed. If there are additional implant locations, the practitioner repeats the process shown in blocks 18-28 until there are no additional implant locations.


Once every desired implant location has been analyzed and an appropriate implant for each proposed location found, the FEA simulation may be ended.


It is contemplated that the FEA simulation may allow one or more of the properties to be optimized. For example, initial implant stability may be optimized, such that the selected implant allows immediate loading in a manner that will be less likely to cause the implant to come loose prior to osseointegration. Similarly, an implant may be selected that maximizes the initial implant stability relative to a given maximum torque required to install an implant.


Turning now to FIG. 2, a method 100 is shown that depicts a similar method to the method 10 depicted in FIG. 1, expect the method 100 of FIG. 2 uses software to optimize the implant selection based on a selected criteria or criterion.


As shown in block 112, a CT scan is performed on a patient that is used in block 114 to create a 3D CAD model of the patient's mouth. Based on the CT scan, properties of the patient's bone may be determined, as shown in block 116. It is contemplated that the properties of the patient's bone may be determined by selecting the types of bone in a patient's mouth, and assigning properties to regions of the 3D CAD model based upon typical material properties for that type of bone as shown in block 118. Alternatively, the CT scan may be used to determine bone density such that a magnitude of bone density is assigned various regions within the 3D CAD model based upon the CT scan.


Once the 3D CAD model has been assigned properties based upon the CT scan, the practitioner determines the desired locations for implant placement, as shown at block 120. Next, as shown in block 122, the practitioner determines at least one variable to optimize utilizing a FEA simulation. The variable to be optimized may be, for example, the initial implant stability, the amount of torque to install an implant, an acceptable amount of stress and strain within the bone around the implant, some other variable, or some combination of variables. An example of a combination of variables would be to optimize the initial implant stability for a low torque level required to seat an implant.


After the variable, or variables, to be optimized is selected, a FEA simulation of implant placement is performed at block 124. The FEA simulation may evaluate a plurality of implants contained in a library of the 3D CAD system. The FEA simulation produces a result at block 126 that informs a practitioner of the implant that optimizes the result for the variable, or variables, the practitioner had selected. For example, if a practitioner had chosen to maximize initial implant stability while minimizing placement torque, the FEA simulation would be performed on a variety of implants, and the FEA simulation would inform the practitioner of the particular implant that best meets the selected criterion. Once the implant for a first desired location has been selected, it is determined at block 128 if there are any additional implants required by the patient. If additional implants are required, the method returns to step 120 for the next implant. If there are no additional implants, the FEA simulation is ended, as shown in block 130.


It is contemplated according to another method that the practitioner may constrain the results given by the FEA simulation as shown in FIG. 2. For example, the practitioner may specify a diameter for the implant, and then the FEA simulation will be limited to optimizing the criterion selected only for implants of the chosen diameter. Additional examples of variable constraints the practitioner may place on the FEA simulation include, but are not limited to, implant length, implant thread design, osteotomy profile, whether the osteotomy has a countersink, and whether the osteotomy is tapped.


As shown in FIG. 3, a further method 200 is shown in which a custom patient specific implant is designed based upon an FEA simulation. Similar to the methods previously described, a CT scan of a patient's mouth is taken at block 212. From the CT scan, a 3D CAD model of the patient's mouth is created, as depicted at block 214. As depicted at block 216, properties of the patient's bone are determined from the CT scan, such as bone type, or bone density. Once the properties of the patient's mouth are determined, the properties are assigned to 3D CAD model of the patient's mouth at block 218.


At block 220 of FIG. 3, the practitioner then selects desired locations for at least one implant. The practitioner at block 222 selects at least one variable to optimize using an FEA simulation, such as, for example, creating a high level of initial implant stability with a low level of torque required to seat the implant.


An FEA simulation is performed on the 3D CAD model to determine implant-design variables at step 224. Based upon the implant-design variables determined by the FEA simulation, a custom implant is designed for the patient that optimizes the at least one variable previously selected by the practitioner, as shown at block 226. A 3D CAD model of the custom implant is created at block 228 that may be used to machine a custom implant. The method determines at block 230 if there is an additional implant required by the patient. If there is, the method returns to block 220 if not, the FEA simulation is ended as shown at block 232.


It is contemplated according to some processes that a limited number of implant design variables may be modified to create a custom implant for a patient. Implant variables that may be modified include, but are not limited to, implant diameter, implant length, implant material, implant surface preparation, and implant thread design including thread type, thread width, diameter, and the thread pitch.


While an FEA simulation is a valuable tool for selecting or designing a proper implant for a patient, the FEA simulation must be verified by comparing an FEA simulation with measured data collected when placing an implant into a sample, as shown by method 300 in FIG. 4. FIG. 4 illustrates the manner in which the FEA modeling analysis is verified.


As shown at block 310, a CT scan is performed on a calibration sample. Actual material properties of the calibration sample are known. Data generated by the CT scan of the calibration sample is used to form a 3D CAD model of the calibration sample at block 312. Next, properties of the calibration sample are determined at block 314 and assigned to the 3D CAD model at block 316. A desired location for placing the implant within the calibration sample is selected at block 318. Block 320 depicts a FEA simulation being performed on the 3D CAD model.


As shown at block 322, an actual implant is placed into the calibration sample. The implant is placed into the calibration sample using a test fixture that measures data during the placement of the implant into the calibration sample as shown at block 324. Examples of data that may be collected include the torque required to place the implant, the stress and strain levels of the implant, and the stress and strain level of the calibration sample near the implant. Once the measured data is obtained, the FEA simulation results are compared to the measured data, as shown at block 326. Next it is determined whether the FEA simulation result compares favorably with the measured data, as shown in block 328. If the FEA simulation does not accurately predict the measured data, FEA simulation variables are adjusted at block 330. Non-limiting examples of variables that may be adjusted include material properties, such as the modulus of elasticity of the bone, the yield strength of the bone or implant, shear strength of the bone or implant, mechanical properties, failure criteria, such as why the implant or bone failed, and failure response, such as what happened to the bone after failure. After adjusting the FEA simulation variables, the FEA simulation is performed again using the adjusted variables as shown at block 332. The adjusted FEA simulation results are then again compared with the measured data, and this process repeats until the FEA simulation results closely track the measured data. Once the FEA simulation is determined to accurately predict the measured data, the FEA simulation is considered to be properly calibrated, as shown at block 334.


Once the method 300 depicted in FIG. 4 is completed, one of the previous analysis methods shown in FIGS. 1-3 may be performed with confidence that the FEA simulation model produces results that accurately predict the forces and stresses present during the placement of the implant.


While the above methods have been described using CT scanning to generate data to form a 3D CAD model, it is contemplated that other methods may be used to gather this data. For example, an X-ray may be used in place of CT scan.


While the above embodiments have related to dental implants, it is contemplated that the above described methods may be utilized on other regions of a patient's body with other types of non-dental implants, such as orthopedic implants.


While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for placing an implant in a patient comprising: performing a CT scan of an anatomical area of a patient;creating a 3D CAD model of the anatomical area utilizing data generated by the CT scan;determining properties of the anatomical area based upon data generated by the CT scan;assigning the determined properties of the anatomical area to the 3D CAD model;selecting a desired location for the implant and an implant to be placed into the anatomical area;assigning at least one variable to be optimized by a FEA simulation;performing an FEA simulation in real-time of placing the implant into the anatomical area on the 3D CAD model to optimize the assigned variable;determining a necessary transient torque to seat the selected implant into the anatomical area based on the determined properties of the anatomical area, the selected implant and the desired location via the real-time FEA simulation; andchoosing a protocol to seat the selected implant based upon results from performing the FEA simulation and the necessary transient torque.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining properties determines the properties of the bone present in the anatomical area.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining properties determines a magnitude of bone density of the anatomical area.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein assigning the at least one variable to optimize assigns initial implant stability relative to the necessary transient torque to seat the implant in the bone as the variable to optimize.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein assigning the at least one variable to optimize assigns a maximum stress level not to be surpassed in the bone surrounding the implant.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein performing an FEA simulation occurs on a plurality of possible implants contained in a library of the 3D CAD system to optimize the assigned variable.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the anatomical area is a patient's mouth and the implant is a dental implant.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising designing an osteotomy for the anatomical area based on the determined properties of the anatomical area, the selected implant and the desired location via the real-time FEA simulation.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein performing the FEA simulation includes a simulating a plurality of possible protocols each including an osteotomy, wherein the associated geometries for the osteotomies are stored in a library of the 3D CAD system to optimize the assigned variable.
  • 10. A method for selecting a clinically appropriate implant to be used in an anatomical area of a patient including a bone, the method comprising: storing a CT scan of the anatomical area;creating a 3D CAD model of the anatomical area utilizing data generated by the CT scan;determining properties of the anatomical area based upon data generated by the CT scan assign the determined properties of the anatomical area to the 3D CAD model;accepting a selection of a desired location for the implant and an implant to be placed into the anatomical area;performing a real-time FEA simulation of placing the selected implant in the anatomical area with the 3D CAD model; anddetermining a necessary transient torque to seat the selected implant into the anatomical area based on the determined properties of the anatomical area, the selected implant and the desired location via the real-time FEA simulation.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the properties of the anatomical area includes properties of the bone present in the anatomical area.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the properties of the anatomical area includes a magnitude of bone density of the anatomical area.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the selection of an implant is made from a CAD library having a plurality of 3D CAD models of implants.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the anatomical area is a patient's mouth and the implant is a dental implant.
  • 15. The method of claim 10, further comprising a CT scanner operable to generate the CT scan of the anatomical area.
  • 16. The method of claim 10, further comprising optimizing at least one variable by the FEA simulation.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one variable is the initial implant stability relative to the necessary transient torque to seat the implant in the bone.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one variable is the maximum stress level not to be surpassed in the bone surrounding the implant.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/530,708, filed Jun. 22, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,089,380, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/151,261, filed on May 5, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,206,153, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/930,812, filed May 18, 2007. All of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (441)
Number Name Date Kind
3906634 Aspel Sep 1975 A
3919772 Lenczycki Nov 1975 A
3958471 Muller May 1976 A
4011602 Rybicki et al. Mar 1977 A
4056585 Waltke Nov 1977 A
4086701 Kawahara et al. May 1978 A
4177562 Miller et al. Dec 1979 A
4294544 Altschuler et al. Oct 1981 A
4306862 Knox Dec 1981 A
4325373 Slivenko et al. Apr 1982 A
4341312 Scholer Jul 1982 A
4364381 Sher et al. Dec 1982 A
4439152 Small Mar 1984 A
4543953 Slocum et al. Oct 1985 A
4547157 Driskell Oct 1985 A
4571180 Kulick Feb 1986 A
4611288 Duret Sep 1986 A
4624673 Meyer Nov 1986 A
4663720 Duret May 1987 A
4713004 Linkow et al. Dec 1987 A
4756689 Lundgren et al. Jul 1988 A
4758161 Niznick Jul 1988 A
4767331 Hoe Aug 1988 A
4772204 Soderberg Sep 1988 A
4795432 Karczmer Jan 1989 A
4821200 Oberg Apr 1989 A
4842518 Linkow et al. Jun 1989 A
4850870 Lazzara et al. Jul 1989 A
4850873 Lazzara et al. Jul 1989 A
4854872 Detsch Aug 1989 A
4856994 Lazzara et al. Aug 1989 A
4872839 Brajnovic Oct 1989 A
4906191 Soderberg Mar 1990 A
4906420 Brajnovic et al. Mar 1990 A
4931016 Sillard Jun 1990 A
4935635 O'Harra Jun 1990 A
4961674 Wang et al. Oct 1990 A
4964770 Steinbichler Oct 1990 A
4986753 Sellers Jan 1991 A
4988297 Lazzara et al. Jan 1991 A
4998881 Lauks Mar 1991 A
5000685 Brajnovic Mar 1991 A
5006069 Lazzara et al. Apr 1991 A
5015183 Fenick May 1991 A
5015186 Detsch May 1991 A
5030096 Hurson et al. Jul 1991 A
5035619 Daftary Jul 1991 A
5040982 Stefan-Dogar Aug 1991 A
5040983 Binon Aug 1991 A
5064375 Jorneus Nov 1991 A
5071351 Green, Jr. et al. Dec 1991 A
5073111 Daftary Dec 1991 A
5087200 Brajnovic et al. Feb 1992 A
5100323 Friedman et al. Mar 1992 A
5104318 Piche et al. Apr 1992 A
5106300 Voitik Apr 1992 A
5122059 Durr et al. Jun 1992 A
5125839 Ingber et al. Jun 1992 A
5125841 Carlsson et al. Jun 1992 A
5133660 Fenick Jul 1992 A
5135395 Marlin Aug 1992 A
5145371 Jorneus Sep 1992 A
5145372 Daftary Sep 1992 A
5176516 Koizumi Jan 1993 A
5188800 Green, Jr. et al. Feb 1993 A
5195892 Gersberg Mar 1993 A
5205745 Kamiya et al. Apr 1993 A
5209659 Friedman et al. May 1993 A
5209666 Balfour et al. May 1993 A
5213502 Daftary May 1993 A
5237998 Duret et al. Aug 1993 A
5246370 Coatoam Sep 1993 A
5257184 Mushabac Oct 1993 A
5281140 Niznick Jan 1994 A
5286195 Clostermann Feb 1994 A
5286196 Brajnovic et al. Feb 1994 A
5292252 Nickerson et al. Mar 1994 A
5297963 Dafatry Mar 1994 A
5302125 Kownacki et al. Apr 1994 A
5312254 Rosenlicht May 1994 A
5312409 McLaughlin et al. May 1994 A
5316476 Krauser May 1994 A
5320529 Pompa Jun 1994 A
5328371 Hund et al. Jul 1994 A
5334024 Niznick Aug 1994 A
5336090 Wilson, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5338196 Beaty et al. Aug 1994 A
5338198 Wu et al. Aug 1994 A
5343391 Mushabac Aug 1994 A
5344457 Pilliar et al. Sep 1994 A
5350297 Cohen Sep 1994 A
5359511 Schroeder et al. Oct 1994 A
5362234 Salazar et al. Nov 1994 A
5362235 Daftary Nov 1994 A
5368483 Sutter et al. Nov 1994 A
5370692 Fink et al. Dec 1994 A
5372502 Massen et al. Dec 1994 A
5386292 Massen et al. Jan 1995 A
5413481 Goppel et al. May 1995 A
5417569 Perisse May 1995 A
5417570 Zuest et al. May 1995 A
5419702 Beaty et al. May 1995 A
5431567 Daftary Jul 1995 A
5437551 Chalifoux Aug 1995 A
5440393 Wenz Aug 1995 A
5452219 Dehoff et al. Sep 1995 A
5458488 Chalifoux Oct 1995 A
5476382 Daftary Dec 1995 A
5476383 Beaty et al. Dec 1995 A
5492471 Singer Feb 1996 A
5516288 Sichler et al. May 1996 A
5527182 Willoughby Jun 1996 A
5533898 Mena Jul 1996 A
5538426 Harding et al. Jul 1996 A
5547377 Daftary Aug 1996 A
5556278 Meitner Sep 1996 A
5564921 Marlin Oct 1996 A
5564924 Kwan Oct 1996 A
5569578 Mushabac Oct 1996 A
5575656 Hajjar Nov 1996 A
5580244 White Dec 1996 A
5580246 Fried et al. Dec 1996 A
5595703 Swaelens Jan 1997 A
5613852 Bavitz Mar 1997 A
5630717 Zuest et al. May 1997 A
5636986 Pezeshkian Jun 1997 A
5651675 Singer Jul 1997 A
5652709 Andersson Jul 1997 A
5658147 Phimmasone Aug 1997 A
5662476 Ingber et al. Sep 1997 A
5674069 Osorio Oct 1997 A
5674071 Beaty et al. Oct 1997 A
5674073 Ingber et al. Oct 1997 A
5681167 Lazarof Oct 1997 A
5685715 Beaty et al. Nov 1997 A
5688283 Knapp Nov 1997 A
5704936 Mazel Jan 1998 A
5718579 Kennedy Feb 1998 A
5725376 Poirier Mar 1998 A
5733124 Kwan Mar 1998 A
5741215 D'Urso Apr 1998 A
5743916 Greenberg et al. Apr 1998 A
5759036 Hinds Jun 1998 A
5762125 Mastrorio Jun 1998 A
5762500 Lazarof Jun 1998 A
5768134 Swaelens et al. Jun 1998 A
5769636 Di Sario Jun 1998 A
5791902 Lauks Aug 1998 A
5800168 Cascione et al. Sep 1998 A
5813858 Singer Sep 1998 A
5823778 Schmitt Oct 1998 A
5842859 Palacci Dec 1998 A
5846079 Knode Dec 1998 A
5851115 Carlsson et al. Dec 1998 A
5857853 van Nifterick et al. Jan 1999 A
5871358 Ingber et al. Feb 1999 A
5873722 Lazzara et al. Feb 1999 A
5876204 Day et al. Mar 1999 A
5885078 Cagna et al. Mar 1999 A
5888034 Greenberg Mar 1999 A
5904483 Wade May 1999 A
5915962 Rosenlicht Jun 1999 A
5927982 Kruger Jul 1999 A
5938443 Lazzara et al. Aug 1999 A
5954769 Rosenlicht Sep 1999 A
5964591 Beaty et al. Oct 1999 A
5967777 Klein et al. Oct 1999 A
5984681 Huang Nov 1999 A
5989025 Conley Nov 1999 A
5989029 Osorio et al. Nov 1999 A
5989258 Hattori Nov 1999 A
5997681 Kinzie Dec 1999 A
6000939 Ray et al. Dec 1999 A
6008905 Breton et al. Dec 1999 A
6068479 Kwan May 2000 A
6099311 Wagner et al. Aug 2000 A
6099313 Dorken et al. Aug 2000 A
6099314 Kopelman et al. Aug 2000 A
6120293 Lazzara et al. Sep 2000 A
6129548 Lazzara et al. Oct 2000 A
6135773 Lazzara Oct 2000 A
6142782 Lazarof Nov 2000 A
6174168 Dehoff et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175413 Lucas Jan 2001 B1
6190169 Bluemli et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197410 Vallittu et al. Mar 2001 B1
6200125 Akutagawa Mar 2001 B1
6206693 Hultgren Mar 2001 B1
6210162 Chishti et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217334 Hultgren Apr 2001 B1
6227859 Sutter May 2001 B1
6283753 Willoughby Sep 2001 B1
6287119 Van Nifterick et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296483 Champleboux Oct 2001 B1
6319000 Brangnemark Nov 2001 B1
6322728 Brodkin et al. Nov 2001 B1
6382975 Poirier May 2002 B1
6402707 Ernst Jun 2002 B1
6488503 Lichkus et al. Dec 2002 B1
6497574 Miller Dec 2002 B1
6540784 Barlow et al. Apr 2003 B2
6568936 MacDougald et al. May 2003 B2
6575751 Lehmann et al. Jun 2003 B1
6594539 Geng Jul 2003 B1
6610079 Li et al. Aug 2003 B1
6619958 Beaty et al. Sep 2003 B2
6629840 Chishti et al. Oct 2003 B2
6634883 Ranalli Oct 2003 B2
6648640 Rubbert et al. Nov 2003 B2
6671539 Gateno et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672870 Knapp Jan 2004 B2
6688887 Morgan Feb 2004 B2
6691764 Embert et al. Feb 2004 B2
6743491 Cirincione et al. Jun 2004 B2
6755652 Nanni Jun 2004 B2
6772026 Bradbury et al. Aug 2004 B2
6776614 Wiechmann et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783359 Kapit Aug 2004 B2
6790040 Amber et al. Sep 2004 B2
6793491 Klein et al. Sep 2004 B2
6808659 Schulman et al. Oct 2004 B2
6814575 Poirier Nov 2004 B2
6821462 Schulman et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829498 Kipke et al. Dec 2004 B2
D503804 Phleps et al. Apr 2005 S
6882894 Durbin et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885464 Pfeiffer et al. Apr 2005 B1
6902401 Jorneus Jun 2005 B2
6913463 Blacklock Jul 2005 B2
6926442 Stöckl Aug 2005 B2
6926525 Ronrig et al. Aug 2005 B1
6939489 Moszner et al. Sep 2005 B2
6942699 Stone et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953383 Rothenberger Oct 2005 B2
6957118 Kopelman et al. Oct 2005 B2
6966772 Malin et al. Nov 2005 B2
6970760 Wolf et al. Nov 2005 B2
6971877 Harter Dec 2005 B2
6994549 Brodkin et al. Feb 2006 B2
7010150 Pfeiffer et al. Mar 2006 B1
7010153 Zimmermann Mar 2006 B2
7012988 Adler et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018207 Prestipino Mar 2006 B2
7021934 Aravena Apr 2006 B2
7029275 Rubbert et al. Apr 2006 B2
7044735 Malin May 2006 B2
7056115 Phan et al. Jun 2006 B2
7056472 Behringer Jun 2006 B1
7059856 Marotta Jun 2006 B2
7066736 Kumar et al. Jun 2006 B2
7084868 Farag et al. Aug 2006 B2
7086860 Schuman et al. Aug 2006 B2
7097451 Tang Aug 2006 B2
7104795 Dadi Sep 2006 B2
7110844 Kopelman et al. Sep 2006 B2
7112065 Kopelman et al. Sep 2006 B2
7118375 Durbin et al. Oct 2006 B2
D532991 Gozzi Dec 2006 S
7153132 Tedesco Dec 2006 B2
7153135 Thomas Dec 2006 B1
7163443 Basler et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175434 Brajnovic Feb 2007 B2
7175435 Andersson et al. Feb 2007 B2
7178731 Basler Feb 2007 B2
7214062 Morgan May 2007 B2
7220124 Taub et al. May 2007 B2
7228191 Hofmeister et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236842 Kopelman et al. Jun 2007 B2
7281927 Marotta Oct 2007 B2
7286954 Kopelman et al. Oct 2007 B2
7303420 Huch et al. Dec 2007 B2
7319529 Babayoff Jan 2008 B2
7322746 Beckhaus et al. Jan 2008 B2
7322824 Schmitt Jan 2008 B2
7324680 Zimmermann Jan 2008 B2
7329122 Scott Feb 2008 B1
7333874 Taub et al. Feb 2008 B2
7335876 Eiff et al. Feb 2008 B2
D565184 Royzen Mar 2008 S
7367801 Saliger May 2008 B2
7379584 Rubbert et al. May 2008 B2
D571471 Stöckl Jun 2008 S
7381191 Fallah Jun 2008 B2
7383094 Kopelman et al. Jun 2008 B2
D575747 Abramovich et al. Aug 2008 S
7421608 Schron Sep 2008 B2
7429175 Gittelson Sep 2008 B2
7435088 Brajnovic Oct 2008 B2
7476100 Kuo Jan 2009 B2
7481647 Samba et al. Jan 2009 B2
7488174 Kopelman et al. Feb 2009 B2
7497619 Stoeckl Mar 2009 B2
7497983 Khan et al. Mar 2009 B2
7520747 Stonisch Apr 2009 B2
7522764 Schwotzer Apr 2009 B2
7534266 Kluger May 2009 B2
7536234 Kopelman et al. May 2009 B2
7545372 Kopelman et al. Jun 2009 B2
7551760 Scharlack et al. Jun 2009 B2
7555403 Kopelman et al. Jun 2009 B2
7556496 Cinader, Jr. et al. Jul 2009 B2
7559692 Beckhaus et al. Jul 2009 B2
7563397 Schulman et al. Jul 2009 B2
D597769 Richter et al. Aug 2009 S
7572058 Pruss et al. Aug 2009 B2
7572125 Brajnovic Aug 2009 B2
7574025 Feldman Aug 2009 B2
7578673 Wen et al. Aug 2009 B2
7580502 Dalpiaz et al. Aug 2009 B2
7581951 Lehmann et al. Sep 2009 B2
7582855 Pfeiffer Sep 2009 B2
7628537 Schulze-Ganzlin Dec 2009 B2
7632097 Clerck Dec 2009 B2
7653455 Cinader, Jr. Jan 2010 B2
7654823 Dadi Feb 2010 B2
7655586 Brodkin et al. Feb 2010 B1
7658610 Knopp Feb 2010 B2
7665989 Brajnovic et al. Feb 2010 B2
7679723 Schwotzer Mar 2010 B2
7687754 Eiff et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689308 Holzner et al. Mar 2010 B2
D614210 Basler et al. Apr 2010 S
7698014 Dunne et al. Apr 2010 B2
7774084 Cinader, Jr. Aug 2010 B2
7780907 Schmidt et al. Aug 2010 B2
7785007 Stoeckl Aug 2010 B2
7787132 Körner et al. Aug 2010 B2
7796811 Orth et al. Sep 2010 B2
7798708 Erhardt et al. Sep 2010 B2
7801632 Orth et al. Sep 2010 B2
7815371 Schulze-Ganzlin Oct 2010 B2
7824181 Sers Nov 2010 B2
D629908 Jerger et al. Dec 2010 S
7855354 Eiff Dec 2010 B2
7865261 Pfeiffer Jan 2011 B2
7876877 Stockl Jan 2011 B2
7901209 Saliger et al. Mar 2011 B2
7982731 Orth et al. Jul 2011 B2
7985119 Basler et al. Jul 2011 B2
7986415 Thiel et al. Jul 2011 B2
8038440 Swaelens et al. Oct 2011 B2
8047895 Basler Nov 2011 B2
8057912 Basler et al. Nov 2011 B2
8062034 Hanisch et al. Nov 2011 B2
8206153 Berckmans et al. Jun 2012 B2
20010008751 Chishti et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010034010 MacDougald et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020010568 Rubbert et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020028418 Farag et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020160337 Klein et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020167100 Moszner et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030130605 Besek Jul 2003 A1
20030222366 Stangel et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040029074 Brajnovic Feb 2004 A1
20040048227 Brajnovic Mar 2004 A1
20040219477 Harter Nov 2004 A1
20040219479 Malin et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040219490 Gartner et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040220691 Hofmeister et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243481 Bradbury et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040259051 Brajnovic Dec 2004 A1
20050023710 Brodkin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050056350 Dolabdjian et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070782 Brodkin Mar 2005 A1
20050084144 Feldman Apr 2005 A1
20050100861 Choi May 2005 A1
20050170311 Tardieu et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050271996 Sporbert et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277089 Brajnovic Dec 2005 A1
20050277090 Anderson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277091 Andersson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050282106 Sussman et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283065 Babayoff Dec 2005 A1
20060006561 Brajnovic Jan 2006 A1
20060008763 Brajnovic Jan 2006 A1
20060008770 Brajnovic et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060093988 Swaelens et al. May 2006 A1
20060094951 Dean et al. May 2006 A1
20060127848 Sogo et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060210949 Stoop Sep 2006 A1
20060263741 Imgrund et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060281041 Rubbert et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070015111 Kopelman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031790 Raby et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070065777 Becker Mar 2007 A1
20070077532 Harter Apr 2007 A1
20070092854 Powell et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070118243 Schroeder May 2007 A1
20070141525 Cinader, Jr. et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070211081 Quadling et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070218426 Quadling et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070269769 Marchesi Nov 2007 A1
20070281277 Brajnovic Dec 2007 A1
20080038692 Andersson et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080044794 Brajnovic Feb 2008 A1
20080057467 Gittelson Mar 2008 A1
20080070181 Abolfathi et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080085489 Schmitt Apr 2008 A1
20080090210 Brajnovic Apr 2008 A1
20080114371 Kluger May 2008 A1
20080118895 Brajnovic May 2008 A1
20080124676 Marotta May 2008 A1
20080153061 Marcello Jun 2008 A1
20080153065 Brajnovic Jun 2008 A1
20080153069 Holzner et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080176189 Stonisch Jul 2008 A1
20080206714 Schmitt Aug 2008 A1
20080241798 Holzner et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080261165 Steingart et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080300716 Kopelman et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090017418 Gittelson Jan 2009 A1
20090026643 Wiest et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090042167 Van Der Zel Feb 2009 A1
20090081616 Pfeiffer Mar 2009 A1
20090087817 Jansen et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090098510 Zhang Apr 2009 A1
20090098511 Zhang Apr 2009 A1
20090123045 Quadling et al. May 2009 A1
20090123887 Brajnovic May 2009 A1
20090187393 Van Lierde et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090220916 Fisker et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090220917 Jensen Sep 2009 A1
20090239197 Brajnovic Sep 2009 A1
20090239200 Brajnovic et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090253097 Brajnovic Oct 2009 A1
20090287332 Adusumilli et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090298009 Brajnovic Dec 2009 A1
20090298017 Boerjes et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090317763 Brajnovic Dec 2009 A1
20090325122 Brajnovic et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100009314 Tardieu et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100028827 Andersson et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100038807 Brodkin et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100075275 Brainovic Mar 2010 A1
20100092904 Esposti et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100173260 Sogo Jul 2010 A1
20100280798 Pattijn et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110008751 Pettersson Jan 2011 A1
20110191081 Malfliet et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110275032 Tardieu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120010740 Swaelens et al. Jan 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (19)
Number Date Country
10029256 Nov 2000 DE
1994026200 Nov 1994 WO
1999032045 Jul 1999 WO
2000008415 Feb 2000 WO
2001058379 Aug 2001 WO
2002053055 Jul 2002 WO
2003024352 Mar 2003 WO
2004030565 Apr 2004 WO
2004075771 Sep 2004 WO
2004087000 Oct 2004 WO
2004098435 Nov 2004 WO
2006014130 Feb 2006 WO
2006062459 Jun 2006 WO
2006082198 Aug 2006 WO
2007033157 Mar 2007 WO
2007104842 Sep 2007 WO
2007129955 Nov 2007 WO
2008057955 May 2008 WO
2008083857 Jul 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Van Staden, R.C. et al. “Step-wise Analysis of Dental Implant Insertion Process Using Finite Element Technique.” Clinical Oral Implants Research. Jul. 2006 (19 pages).
Biomet 3i NavigatorTM “Navigator™ System for CT Guided Surgery Manual,” pp. 1-26, Oct. 2007.
Imaterialise Medical; “Surgical Guide Cookbook, Drill Guides for Every Scenario”, pp. 1-87, Prior to Oct. 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150320519 A1 Nov 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60930812 May 2007 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13530708 Jun 2012 US
Child 14805977 US
Parent 12151261 May 2008 US
Child 13530708 US