Method for treatment of dredged materials to form a structural fill

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6293731
  • Patent Number
    6,293,731
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 15, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 25, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A method for treating materials dredged from a waterway, such as a harbor or channel, and forming a mixture suitable for beneficial re-use as structural fill. The dredged materials (28) may be placed in a treatment vessel (26) which transports the dredged materials (28) through a plurality of processing stages including a dewatering stage, a debris removal stage, a fixation, stabilization and solidification stage, a curing stage, and an offloading stage. The fixation, stabilization and solidification stage involves adding a cement type additive such as Portland Cement along with other additives which stabilize the dredged materials by chemical fixation and solidification to form the structural fill.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates in general to the fixation, stabilization and solidification of materials dredged from a waterways and, in particular to, a method for processing the dredged materials to form a mixture suitable for a beneficial re-use as a structural fill.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The waterways of the United States have served many practical needs, such as large-scale transportation of both commodities and manufactured goods, recreational activities, water front living environments, and oil, gas and mineral supplies. The utilization of these waterway resources has involved the construction and maintenance of many structures including harbors, locks, canals, marinas, breakwaters, shore protection and water intakes so that, among other things, ships and marine equipment may be operated in all kinds of weather conditions. It is estimated that up to 95 percent of the commerce in the United States depends on ocean transportation. For example, in 1994, 4,537 ships were called at port in New York Harbor, each carrying the equivalent of 1,000 railcars or 2,000 trucks which represents 12 percent of the total ocean commerce in the United States.




It has been found, however, that dredging is often required to maintain water depth in waterways such as harbors and channels. For example, New York Harbor is a natural shallow estuary fed by the Hudson, Passaic and Hackensack Rivers. It receives between about three and five million cubic yards of sediment drift each year, creating shoals that threaten to block its 240 miles of navigational channels. The natural depth of New York Harbor is only about 18 feet, while most cargo ships require at least a 40-foot draft.




The build up of sediment further decreases the depth of New York Harbor and, thus, large fully loaded container ships may no longer be accommodated. As a result, many vessels must unload part of their cargo on barges in deeper parts of the Harbor or at other ports. After lightening, the container ships float high enough in the water to be docked. Similarly, oil tankers must perform a procedure called “lightering” in which some of the crude oil is pumped into smaller barges out in the ocean. These types of procedures greatly impact the cost of transportation as well as increasing the risk of environmental contamination from oil spills. As such, the livelihood of harbors, such as New York Harbor, depends on the continued clearing of silt therefrom.




It has been found, however, that dredged sediments are often contaminated with pollutants. Specifically, dioxins, PCBs, heavy metals including lead, mercury and cadmium, pesticides, as well as other contaminants from waste water discharges and run off attach themselves to the silt that washes into harbors. In the past, silt and muck dredged up from the port of New York and New Jersey has been dumped in the ocean in a 2.2 square mile area known as the Mud Dump.




Since 1977, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has been testing sediment that is dumped into the ocean using a pass/fail test. The EPA's regional office in New York, however, enforces a more stringent guideline for New York Harbor. Dredged materials are classified into three categories: Category I means the sediment is clean enough to dump in the ocean; Category II mud has trace levels of chemicals which could formerly be dumped in the ocean and “capped” with clean sand but presently has been barred from disposal in the Mud Dump; and Category III is so contaminated that federal law prohibits ocean disposal. It has been estimated by the Army Corp of Engineers that two-thirds of the sediment in New York Harbor falls within Category III. An additional 20 percent of the sediment falls within Category II.




A variety of prior methods have been used to clear silt from navigational channels that do not require dumping the dredged materials into the ocean. For example, efforts have been made to level or reprofile the accumulated silt rather than removing it. At best, this approach yields a short term solution given the volume of sediment drift into harbors and channels. Other alternatives have been suggested to dispose of dredged materials. For example, digging an underwater pit to bury dredged materials that have been packaged in large containers or building a contaminant island to store the dredged material. Digging an underwater pit, however, could disturb heavy metals such as mercury, lead and cadmium below the sea floor and would require several years to prepare. Similarly, constructing a contaminant island may cost between $500 million and $1 billion and would take more than five years to prepare.




Alternatively, dredged materials have been transferred to landfills or other on land sites for disposal. This approach, however, may cost more than 20 times that of dumping in the ocean and requires the transfer and transportation of contaminated materials which creates a separate and further environmental risk. Additionally, prior methods for re-use of the dredged materials have not been successful. For example, prior attempts to use dredged material for resurfacing roads have yielded an asphalt with a limited life due to the low durability and friability of the end product.




Therefore, a need has arisen for a method and associated apparatus for the treatment of dredged materials that is cost effective on a large scale, that is environmentally sound and that creates a mixture that is suitable for a beneficial re-use as a structural fill.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention disclosed herein comprises a process and the associated apparatus for treatment of dredged materials that is cost effective on a large scale, that is environmentally responsible and that produces a mixture that is suitable for beneficial re-use as a structural file.




The process of the present invention involves dredging materials such as sediment or silt that has been deposited in navigable waterways such as channels, harbors, lakes and rivers. Dredging may be accomplished using a dredging vessel having an engineering clamshell which deposits the dredged material into a treatment vessel, such as a barge or scow. The dredged materials in the treatment vessel are then dewatered and debris is removed therefrom.




An additive is then blended thoroughly into the dredged materials in the treatment vessel. Mixing of the additives into the dredged material is accomplished using a mixing assembly which may have horizontal or vertical mixing systems. Thereafter, the curing process effectively completes the dewatering of the dredged materials, immobilizes the metals and organic constituents in the dredged materials, and creates a highly impermeable structural fill material which may be used as a cap for a landfill, as the site for the construction of a building or as a paving material for parking lots, airfield construction, road base or other Department of Transportation projects.




The treatment of dredged materials in a treatment vessel allows for the processing of contaminated dredged materials following a single move of the dredged materials from the waterway into the treatment vessel. This process not only minimizes the costs associated with moving the dredged materials from one containment vehicle to another, but also, minimizes the environmental impact associated with each move. The fixation, stabilization and solidification process of the present invention also physically and chemically transforms the dredged materials into a structural fill which has beneficial reuse applications and avoids the need and cost for dumping the dredged materials into the ocean or a landfill.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




For a more complete understanding of the present invention, including its features and advantages, reference is now made to the detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals in different drawings represent like parts and in which:





FIG. 1

is a schematic illustration of a dredging vessel centered over a waterway loading dredged materials into a treatment vessel;





FIG. 2

is a schematic illustration of the processing steps for dredged materials of the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a schematic illustration of a debris rake removing debris from dredged materials in a treatment vessel;





FIG. 4

is a schematic illustration of a dredging vessel loading dredged materials into a hopper;





FIG. 5

is a schematic illustration of a mixing assembly attached to a mixing apparatus for stabilizing dredged materials in a treatment vessel;





FIG. 6

is a schematic illustration of a mixing assembly attached to a mixing apparatus positioned on a barge;





FIG. 7

is a bottom view of a mixing apparatus with a mixing assembly attached thereto;





FIG. 8

is a front view partially in section of a mixing assembly of the present invention;





FIG. 9

is a side view of a mixing assembly of the present invention;





FIG. 10

is a schematic illustration of a land based offloading apparatus for transferring processed dredged materials into a hopper;





FIG. 11

is a schematic illustration of a crane positioned on a barge loading processed dredged materials into a hopper; and





FIG. 12

is a schematic illustration of the beneficial re-use of the mixture of the present invention as a structural fill.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




While the making and using of various embodiments of the present invention are discussed in detail below, it should be appreciated that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts which can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention and do not delimit the scope of the invention.




The present invention involves fixation, stabilization and solidification of dredged materials in an environmentally responsible manner requiring a minimum handling of the dredged materials prior to stabilization and avoiding the need for landfill or ocean dumping of the dredged materials.





FIG. 1

depicts a dredging operation that is generally designated


10


. A dredging vessel


12


is positioned in a waterway


14


such as a harbor or channel in which sediment


16


has accumulated. Once the dredging vessel


12


is in position in the waterway


14


, support members such as legs


18


, spuds or anchors may be extended into the sediment


16


to position the dredging vessel


12


which may be, for example, a barge or scow. The dredging vessel


12


may use a crane


20


with a boom


22


to control the position of a clamshell


24


as the sediment


16


is removed from the bottom of the waterway


14


and placed in a treatment vessel


26


. Once in the treatment vessel


26


, the sediment


16


will be referred to herein as dredged materials


28


. It should be noted that dredged materials


28


may typically include sands, silts, clays and other materials in addition to sediment


16


that is removed from the subaqueous location such as waterway


14


.




When performing the dredging operation


10


in an environmentally sensitive area or when the sediment


16


contains contaminants from waste water discharge or runoff such as dioxin, PCBs, heavy metals such as lead, mercury or cadmium or pesticides, specialized dredging practices may be used to help minimize the creation of suspended sediment


16


. For example, the clamshell


24


may be a closed environmental type clamshell and the bite of the clamshell


24


may be maximized to reduce the number of bites needed to move a set volume of sediment


16


. The treatment vessel


26


used for the movement of the dredged materials


28


is typically a solid hull scow.




The need for dredging the waterway


14


typically arises due to the constant sediment drift from interconnective rivers or other runoff which feed into the waterway


14


. Most modern cargo ships presently require at least a 40-foot draft. The new generation of cargo ships generally require a 45-foot draft and future ships are being designed to require even larger drafts. Thus, the need for dredging operations to maintain the depth of waterway


14


will continue.




Even though

FIG. 1

depicts dredging operation


10


as using the dredging vessel


12


in conjunction with the clamshell


24


, it should be noted by one skilled in the art that other mechanical types of dredging apparatus may be used, which are well known in the art, without departing from the principles of the present invention, such as a backhoe or a dipper. In addition, other type of dredging techniques may be used that will fall within the scope of the present invention, including, but not limited to, the use of hopper dredges and hydraulic dredges. The hopper dredges utilize a self-propelled vessel with a hollow hull into which dredged materials


28


are suctioned hydraulically through dragarms. The hydraulic dredges remove sediment


16


using revolving cutterheads to cut and churn sediment


16


and hydraulically pump sediment


16


by pipe to treatment vessel


26


.




Even though

FIG. 1

depicts treatment vessel


26


as an ocean-going vessel, it should be noted by one skilled in the art that alternative types of treatment vessels may be used, without departing from the principles of the present invention including, but not limited to, a land based containment vessel or a pit type containment vessel wherein treatment of the dredged materials


28


may occur.




As depicted in FIG.


2


and after the treatment vessel


26


is filled with the dredged materials


28


, the treatment vessel


26


is towed to a processing area which is generally designated


30


. For example, the treatment vessel


26


may be towed to a location near a dock


32


or adjacent to another barge (not pictured) . Once in place, free standing water is removed from the treatment vessel using pump


34


. The free standing water is pumped into a decant barge


36


which has a plurality of staging units. The water from the pump


34


enters a settling tank


38


wherein gross separation of suspended sentiment


16


from the free standing water takes place. The residence time within settling tank


38


is determined based upon the amount and type of sediment


16


suspended in the water.




After a sufficient time, water from settling tank


38


may spill over into a first polishing tank


40


for further gravitational separation of the constituents in the water. After a sufficient residence time in polishing tank


40


, the water may spill over into a second polishing tank


42


for additional clarification. Water from second polishing tank


42


is then pumped into a clarified water barge


44


which will return the clarified water to the site of the dredging operation


10


.




Even though

FIG. 2

depicts a decant barge


36


for processing water pumped from the treatment vessel


26


, it should be understood by one skilled in the art that water treatment may alternatively occur at the land based water treatment facility using techniques that are common in the art. In addition, it should be noted that the treated or clarified water may be recycled for use at a later stage of the solidification and stabilization process of dredged materials


28


. For example, the clarified water may be mixed with an additive slurry (as will be discussed in more detail below) and pumped into the dredged materials


28


. This approach is preferable particularly when contaminants such as heavy metals are entrained within the clarified water and would require treatment prior to disposal or redepositing in waterway


14


.




After the free standing water is pumped off the dredged materials


28


in the treatment vessel


26


, a debris rake


46


attached to a rake apparatus


48


is used to remove debris


50


from the dredged materials


28


as best seen in FIG.


3


. The raking step eliminates large objects that must be removed from the dredged material


28


to protect the mixing assembly


56


and to engineer the dredged materials


28


to the desired consistency which will allow for the production of a substantially homogeneous end product, for example, an end product that is suitable for beneficial re-use as an engineered structural fill.




The debris rake


46


may comprise a single hook or a plurality of tines which are spaced apart such that large objects on the order of 2-10 feet and small objects on the order of 6 inches are removed from the dredged materials


28


. After the debris


50


is removed from the dredged materials


28


, the debris


50


is placed in a debris container


52


that can be transported off for further processing, decontamination or disposal.




Alternatively, debris


50


may be separated prior to loading the treatment vessel


26


with the dredged materials


28


. For example, as best seen in

FIG. 4

, the dredged materials


28


may be loaded into a hopper


53


from clamshell


24


. The hopper


53


may include one or more vibrating screens which separate oversized materials such as debris


50


from the dredged materials


28


. The oversized materials may then be placed in one compartment in treatment vessel


26


while the remainder of the dredged materials


28


are placed in a separate compartment within the treatment vessel


26


. Alternatively, a non-vibrating screen may be used to separate oversized particles from the debris


50


. The non-vibrating screen may be placed within the hopper


53


or directly over the containment area within treatment vessel


26


.




After the removal of standing water and debris from the dredged materials


28


and now referring to

FIGS. 2

,


5


and


6


, the original treatment vessel


26


that was filled with the dredged materials


28


at dredging operation


10


is towed to a position along dock


32


or adjacent to a barge


54


for the treatment process.




Importantly, in one embodiment of the present invention, the dredged materials


28


are not transferred from one treatment vessel


26


to another or from the treatment vessel


26


to a land based treatment operation thus minimizing the potential environmental impact of the treatment process. Once in place, a mixing assembly


56


attached to a mixing apparatus


58


is placed in the treatment vessel


26


within the dredged materials


28


.




During the treatment process, a slurry of additives may be pumped into the dredged materials


28


as the mixing assembly


56


rotates, thereby transforming the dredged materials


28


into a homogeneous mixture


60


.




The additives, if necessary, may comprise a cement-based additive, such as Portland Cement. In addition or alternatively, the additives may comprise high alkali additives such as CaO, Ca(OH)


2


and CaCO


3


, or mixtures thereof. In addition or alternatively, the additives may comprise FeCl


3


, coal ash, fly ash, bed ash, cement kiln dust, lime kiln dust, clay slag, sodium silicate, calcium silicate, wood chips, ground corn cobs, diatomaceous earth, natural soil, or mixtures thereof. In addition or alternatively, the additives may comprise iron salts, ferrous sulfate, magnesium salts, silica, asphalt emulsions, alcohols, amides, amines, carboxylic acids, carbonyls, sulfonates, activated carbons, sodium carbonates, potassium permanganate, calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite or mixtures thereof. A total additive concentration on the order of 1 to 30 percent, by volume of the dredged materials


28


, is appropriate. A concentration of approximately 1 to 15 percent is preferred. The concentration chosen will be a function of the type, composition, moisture content and contamination level of the dredged materials


28


, as well as the desired characteristics of the end product, for example, for beneficial re-use as an engineered structural fill.




It should be noted that in the event that anaerobic activity is present in the dredged materials


28


which may prevent or delay the solidification of the dredged materials


28


, compressed air or oxygen may be introduced into the dredged materials


28


by, for example, bubbling the air or oxygen through the dredged materials


28


. In addition to introducing air or oxygen into the dredged materials


28


, one or more of the above-identified additives may be added to the dredged materials


28


to minimize anaerobic activity.




Additives may be received from ground transportation


62


and transferred to silos


64


for storage. The additives may be combined in a mixer


66


to form a slurry that is pumped through supply lines


68


via pump


70


directly to the mixing assembly


56


. The additives are introduced into the dredged material


58


in the form of a slurry to promote uniform mixing and to reduce the potential for particulate emissions. It will be understood by one skilled in the art that other methods for the transfer of dry additives from the silos


64


directly to the mixing assembly


56


, such as pneumatic transfer or via a conveyer, may also be used without departing from the principles of the present invention.




In addition to further dehydrating the dredged materials


28


, the physical and chemical treatment performed by mixing apparatus


58


greatly improves the compressive strength and the bearing strength of mixture


60


. Following a curing process, which may last between about one and ten days, the mixture


60


becomes a highly impermeable material


69


which has a compressive strength that exceeds 30 psi. Following the curing process, the material


69


is suitable for beneficial re-use as an engineered structural fill material. It should be noted that the curing of mixture


60


continues beyond the above specified time period as the compressive strengths are typically considered with respect to 28-day strength.




Now referring to

FIGS. 7-9

, one embodiment of the mixing assembly


56


is depicted. The mixing assembly


56


includes a heavy duty tine shaft


72


which is configured such that hydraulic drive motors


74


can be located within the cavities


76


of the tine shaft


72


. Placement of the hydraulic motors


74


within the shaft


72


protects the hydraulic motors


74


from unnecessary contact with the dredged material


58


.




The hydraulic drive motors


74


are attached to yoke arms


78


via a series of mechanical components. The shaft


72


is rotatably supported by yoke arms


78


. Hydraulic fluid is pumped into and out of the hydraulic motors


74


through hydraulic lines


80


,


82


. The hydraulic drive motors


74


apply torque to the torque shaft


84


, thereby affecting rotation of the shaft


72


. A sensor may be used to detect information indicative of torque on the mixing assembly


56


which is displayed to the user of the mixing apparatus


58


as an indication of the consistency of the dredged materials


28


. A rub bar


85


may be disposed about the mixing assembly


56


to prevent contact between the rotating tines


86


and the interior surfaces of the treatment vessel


26


.




As indicated in

FIG. 9

, the tines


86


may be cast as part of a star shaped pattern, with the tines


86


as the arms of the star. The angular position of the tines


86


may be staggered relative to each other, from one star shaped set


88


to the next


90


. One or more chisel-like teeth


92


may be affixed to the end of each tine


86


. As best seen in

FIG. 8

, each of the tines


86


may consist of a pair of spaced apart plates


94


providing for a single-toothed tine


86


alternating with a double-toothed tine


86


, as an example.




Even though

FIGS. 7 and 8

depict alternating single tooth and double tooth designs, it should be noted by one skilled in the art that all tines


86


can have a single tooth or a double tooth design. It should also be noted by one skilled in the art that tines


86


and teeth


92


may be constructed from a single piece of metal such as a half-bracket section that may be bolted or welded directly to shaft


72


.




Even though

FIGS. 7-9

have described mixing assembly


56


in detail as a horizontal mixer, it should be understood by one skilled in the art that a variety of other mixing assemblies including, but not limited to, a vertical auger mixer or a raking system, may be used without departing from the principles of the present invention.





FIG. 10

depicts one method for offloading the material


69


to ground transportation and is generally designated


96


. Following the curing process, the treatment vessel


26


is towed to a position next to dock


32


such that a shovel apparatus


98


may scoop the material


69


out of the treatment vessel


26


and place the material


69


into a hopper


100


. Through gravitational feed, the material


69


travels through the hopper


100


onto a conveyor


102


which transports the material


69


to another land location.




Alternatively, as depicted in

FIG. 11

, a crane


104


located on a barge


54


scoops the material


69


from the treatment vessel


26


using a clamshell


106


extending from the boom


108


. The crane


104


deposits the material


69


into the hopper


100


which feeds directly into ground transportation such as truck


110


or a rail car which may transport the material


69


to another ground location. Similarly, material


69


may be pumped in a pipeline to another ground location.




In

FIG. 12

, a beneficial re-use of the material


69


is depicted. Generally, the beneficial re-use of dredged materials


28


means using the dredged materials


28


as a resource in a productive way. Typically, in considering the beneficial re-use of dredged materials


28


, several criteria may be considered including whether the re-use is scientifically and environmentally sound, whether the re-use has public value, and whether the re-use is economically sound. Additionally, the beneficial re-use of dredged materials


28


may dependent upon local regulations, local preferences, environmental impact, grain size (see Table 1) and levels of contamination (see Table 2) in the dredged materials


28


.


















TABLE 1











Sand




Silt




Clay




Percentage




TOC







Gravel




62.5-2000




3.9-62.5




<3.9




of




dry






SAMPLE




>2000 μm




μm




μm




μm




Moisture




wt











Sample 1




1




28




45




28




47




1.34






Sample 2




0




63




29




 8




21




ND






Sample 3




0




16




60




34




44




1.26






Sample 4




0




 5




61




34




39




1.09






Sample 5




1




25




43




31




54




2.16






Sample 6




1




28




43




30




46




1.77






Sample 7




3




41




34




22




25




0.42






Sample 8




1




77




13




 9




21




0.23






Sample 9




0




34




37




29




48




1.83






Sample 10




0




30




36




34




51




2.14






Sample 11




1




81




10




 8




27




0.21






Sample 12




1




44




31




24




44




1.13






Sample 13




1




53




29




17




39




0.88






Sample 14




1




26




41




32




45




2.23






Sample 15




2




64




19




15




35




0.83






Sample 16




5




48




24




23




47




2.13






Sample 17




0




13




45




42




57




3.55






Sample 18




0




16




46




38




60




2.94






Sample 19




5




60




19




15




38




1.04






Sample 20




3




48




27




22




44




2.07






Sample 21




0




14




45




41




55




3.11






Sample 22




1




31




38




30




52




2.96






Sample 23




0




18




43




39




58




3.32






Sample 24




1




41




32




26




50




2.81






Sample 25




3




96




 0




 1




13




0.02














Table 1 details the composition of a series samples of dredged materials


28


which were analyzed, in total percent by dry weight. It should be noted that these samples are not intended to be representative of typical dredged materials


28


and are presented here as being illustrative only of the composition of dredged materials


28


obtained from a single location as it is well known in the art that the composition of dredged materials


28


will vary from location to location.




As the samples indicate, the majority of the constituents of the dredged materials


28


have a particle size of less than 2000 μm with a majority of some samples having a particle size of less than 62.5 μm. The dredged materials


28


, in the samples, have a high moisture content ranging between 13 and 60 percent. Given the particle size and the moisture content of the dredged materials


28


, it is infeasible to re-use the dredged materials


28


in their virgin form because of the moisture content and a lack a structural strength.




Alternatively, if the dredged materials


28


are allowed to dry without the benefit of the additives of the present invention, the dredged materials


28


become a powdery, dust-like substance with minimal strength and compaction characteristics that prevent beneficial re-use of dredged materials


28


. In addition, the dry form of dredged materials


28


may have an adverse environmental impact as a particulate. Thus, in order to beneficially re-use the dredged materials


28


, additives such as Portland Cement are blended thoroughly into the dredged materials


28


to form a substantially homogeneous materials


69


. This treatment process chemically and physically alters, through fixation, solidification and stabilization, the finer elements of the dredged material


28


so that, upon hydration, the material


69


gains structural strength and a soil-like material while minimizing the likelihood of wind-born fugitive dust emissions.




Additionally, the dredged materials


28


may contain a variety of contaminants, including heavy metals, such as Ag, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn. These and other metals are typical constituents in industrial waste water discharges and runoffs that form sediment


16


. In addition to these metals, other contaminants such as dioxins, PCBs, pesticides as well as other organic and inorganic industrial pollutants may also be present in the dredged material


28


which, along with the metals, may require treatment prior to the use of the dredged materials in a beneficial re-use scenario.




To transform the dredged materials


28


into the material


69


an additive is added thereto. For example, the additive may have a first agent, such as Portland Cement, and a second agent selected from the group consisting of CaO, Ca(OH)


2


and CaCO


3


, FeCl


3


, coal ash, fly ash, bed ash, cement kiln dust, lime kiln dust, clay slag, calcium silicate, wood chips, ground corn cobs, diatomaceous earth, natural soil, iron salts, ferrous sulfate, magnesium salts, silica, asphalt emulsions, alcohols, amides, amines, carboxylic acids, carbonyls, sulfonates, activated carbons, sodium carbonates, potassium permanganate, calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite or mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the concentration of the first agent is between about 1 and 15 percent by weight of dredged material


28


and the concentration of the second agent is between about 1 and 12 percent by weight of dredged material


28


.




After processing, the material


69


is transported to the desired location via ground transportation, such as truck


110


, rail cars or a conveyor. For example, truck


110


which may be equipped with sealed gates such that truck


110


may be loaded directly from treatment vessel


26


, hopper


100


or by a front end loader at a stockpile of the material


69


. The material


69


may be stockpiled to provide additional cure time which is directly related to the compressive strength of the material


69


.




If the material


69


is in a stockpile, it is monitored to determine the status of the curing process so that the material


69


may be moved to its intended beneficial re-use location at the proper time to achieve an engineered design as a structural fill. The stockpile will also allow the material


69


to reach its desired moisture content level such that the compaction and permeability characteristics of the material


69


are suitable for the intended beneficial re-use of material


69


such as for an engineered structural fill material.




Once the material


69


has reached the site for its beneficial re-use, the material


69


is dumped out of truck


110


and is compacted using a compactor


112


. The compaction process creates a plurality of highly impermeable layers or lifts, such as


114


,


116


.




The material


69


is suitable for a variety of beneficial re-use applications. For example, the material


69


may be used as a liner protective cover, a daily cover or a final cap over a landfill, for strip mine reclamation, or as a cap for a “Brownfield” property or in another environmental remediation plan. Material


69


may also be used for as a paving material for parking lots, airfield construction, road base or other Department of Transportation projects. In addition, material


69


may be used for beach nourishment or habitat development projects as well as for other uses the require the use of structural fill. Thus, the method for treatment of dredged materials


28


to form an engineered structural fill material


69


of the present invention not only removes the sediment


16


from the bottom of the waterway


14


, but also, provides for the capping of contaminated or formerly contaminated land making it suitable for industrial, commercial or residential redevelopment.




While this invention has been described in reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is therefore intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.



Claims
  • 1. A method for producing a structural fill material comprising the steps of:obtaining a dredged material; depositing the dredged material into a containment receptacle; removing free water from the dredged material and the containment receptacle; creating an additive slurry in a mixing container; pumping the additive slurry from the mixing container to a mixing assembly disposed within the containment receptacle; mixing the additive slurry into the dredged material to form a substantially homogenous mixture; and, curing the substantially homogenous mixture in the containment receptacle, thereby producing a structural fill material and reducing particulate emissions.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the additive slurry is selected from the group consisting of CaO, Ca(OH)2, CaCO3, FeCl3, natural soils and mixtures thereof.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the additive slurry is selected from the group consisting of CaO, Ca(OH)2, CaCO3, FeCl3, coal ash, fly ash, bed ash, cement kiln dust, lime kiln dust, clay slag, calcium silicate, wood chips, ground corn cobs, diatomaceous earth, natural soil, or mixtures thereof.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the additive slurry is selected from the group consisting of iron salts, ferrous sulfate, magnesium salts, silica, asphalt emulsions, alcohols, amides, amines, carboxylic acids, carbonyls, sulfonates, activated carbons, sodium carbonates, potassium permanganate, calcium hypochlorite, and sodium hypochlorite.
  • 5. A method for producing a stabilized dredged material comprising the steps of:obtaining a dredged material; depositing the dredged material into a containment receptacle; removing free water from the dredged material and the containment receptacle; creating an additive slurry in a mixing container; pumping the additive slurry from the mixing container to a mixing assembly disposed within the containment receptacle; mixing the additive slurry into the dredged material to form a substantially homogenous mixture wherein the additive further comprises a first agent, Portland Cement, and a second agent selected from the group consisting of CaO, Ca(OH)2, CaCO3, FeCl3, natural soils and mixtures thereof; and, curing the substantially homogenous mixture in the containment receptacle, whereby producing a stabilized dredged material and reducing particulate emissions.
  • 6. The method as recited in claim 5 wherein the concentration of the first agent is between about 1 and 15 percent by weight of the dredged material and the concentration of the second agent is between about 1 and 12 percent by weight of the dredged material.
  • 7. A method for producing a stabilized dredged material comprising the steps of:obtaining a dredged material; depositing the dredged material into a containment receptacle; removing free water from the dredged material and the containment receptacle; creating an additive slurry in a mixing container; pumping the additive slurry from the mixing container to a mixing assembly disposed within the containment receptacle; mixing the additive slurry into the dredged material to form a substantially homogenous mixture wherein the additive further comprises a first agent, Portland Cement, and a second agent selected from the group consisting of CaO, Ca(OH)2, CaCO3, FeCl3, coal ash, fly ash, bed ash, cement kiln dust, lime kiln dust, clay slag, sodium silicate, calcium silicate, wood chips, ground corn cobs, diatomaceous earth, natural soil, or mixtures thereof; and, curing the substantially homogenous mixture in the containment receptacle, whereby producing a stabilized dredged material and reducing particulate emissions.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 7 wherein the concentration of the first agent is between about 1 and 15 percent by weight of the dredged material and the concentration of the second agent is between about 1 and 12 percent by weight of the dredged material.
  • 9. A method for producing a stabilized dredged material comprising the steps of:obtaining a dredged material; depositing the dredged material into a containment receptacle; removing free water from the dredged material and the containment receptacle; creating an additive slurry in a mixing container; pumping the additive slurry from the mixing container to a mixing assembly disposed within the containment receptacle; mixing the additive slurry into the dredged material to form a substantially homogenous mixture wherein the additive further comprises a first agent, Portland Cement, and a second agent selected from the group consisting of iron salts, ferrous sulfates, magnesium salts, silica, asphalt emulsions, alcohols, amides, amines, carboxylic acids, carbonyls, sulfonates, activates carbons, sodium carbonates, potassium permanganate, calcium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite or mixture thereof; and, curing the substantially homogenous mixture in the containment receptacle, whereby producing a stabilized dredged material and reducing particulate emissions.
  • 10. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein the concentration of the first agent is between about 1 and 15 percent by weight of the dredged material and the concentration of the second agent is between about 1 and 12 percent by weight of the dredged material.
  • 11. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein the quantity of the additive slurry added to the dredged materials is between about 1 and 30 percent by weight of the dredged material.
  • 12. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein the quantity of the additive slurry added to the dredged materials is between about 1 and 15 percent by weight of the dredged material.
CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/046,616 filed May 15, 1997.

US Referenced Citations (19)
Number Name Date Kind
3947284 Kirsugi et al. Mar 1976
3975266 Baize Aug 1976
4129449 Kojima Dec 1978
4149968 Kupiec et al. Apr 1979
4230568 Chappell Oct 1980
4443260 Miyoshi et al. Apr 1984
4460292 Durham et al. Jul 1984
4465518 Miyoshi et al. Aug 1984
4482271 Mitchell et al. Nov 1984
4504321 Kapland et al. Mar 1985
4539121 Kapland et al. Sep 1985
4744829 Eirich et al. May 1988
5240608 Gurfinkel et al. Aug 1993
5266494 Lahoda et al. Nov 1993
5304701 Kigel et al. Apr 1994
5419839 Haley et al. May 1995
5489741 Weszley Feb 1996
5587947 Studer et al. Dec 1996
5868940 Gurfinkel Feb 1999
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/046616 May 1997 US