Method for varying nitride strip makeup process based on field oxide loss and defect count

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6376261
  • Patent Number
    6,376,261
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 3, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 23, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A method is provided for manufacturing, the method including processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step and measuring a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the first workpiece. The method also includes forming an output signal corresponding to the thickness of the field oxide feature. In addition, the method includes feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a predetermined threshold value.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates generally to semiconductor fabrication technology, and, more particularly, to a method for manufacturing a workpiece.




2. Description of the Related Art




There is a constant drive within the semiconductor industry to increase the quality, reliability and throughput of integrated circuit devices, e.g., microprocessors, memory devices, and the like. This drive is fueled by consumer demands for higher quality computers and electronic devices that operate more reliably. These demands have resulted in a continual improvement in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, e.g., transistors, as well as in the manufacture of integrated circuit devices incorporating such transistors. Additionally, reducing the defects in the manufacture of the components of a typical transistor also lowers the overall cost per transistor as well as the cost of integrated circuit devices incorporating such transistors.




The technologies underlying semiconductor processing tools have attracted increased attention over the last several years, resulting in substantial refinements. However, despite the advances made in this area, many of the processing tools that are currently commercially available suffer certain deficiencies. In particular, such tools often lack advanced process data monitoring capabilities, such as the ability to provide historical parametric data in a user-friendly format, as well as event logging, real-time graphical display of both current processing parameters and the processing parameters of the entire run, and remote, i.e., local site and worldwide, monitoring. These deficiencies can engender nonoptimal control of critical processing parameters, such as throughput accuracy, stability and repeatability, processing temperatures, mechanical tool parameters, and the like. This variability manifests itself as within-run disparities, run-to-run disparities and tool-to-tool disparities that can propagate into deviations in product quality and performance, whereas an ideal monitoring and diagnostics system for such tools would provide a means of monitoring this variability, as well as providing means for optimizing control of critical parameters.




Among the parameters it would be useful to monitor and control are the field oxide (FOX) thickness and the residual FOX defect count following a nitride stripping and/or etching process step. As consecutive lots of workpieces (such as silicon wafers with various process layers formed thereon) are processed through a nitride stripping and/or etching process step, increasing silicon (Si) concentration in the stripping and/or etching bath causes the FOX also to etch in varying amounts. For example, when hot aqueous phosphoric acid (H


3


PO


4


) is used to selectively etch silicon nitride (Si


3


N


4


), the Si


3


N


4


etches away fairly steadily, at roughly ten times the initial etch rate of the FOX (SiO


2


). However, when the H


3


PO


4


bath is fresh and the Si concentration is relatively low, the initial etch rate of the FOX (SiO


2


) is much faster than the later etch rate of the FOX (SiO


2


), as the H


3


PO


4


bath ages and the Si concentration increases. This causes the FOX thicknesses to increase with time, as the H


3


PO


4


bath ages and the Si concentration increases. In particular, the FOX thicknesses typically vary from run to run and/or batch to batch, leading to varying device performance and an increased number of residual FOX defects, lowering the workpiece throughput and increasing the workpiece manufacturing costs. In addition, if the Si concentration oversaturates, Si may precipitate, contaminating the workpiece(s) and increasing the number of defects.




The present invention is directed to overcoming, or at least reducing the effects of, one or more of the problems set forth above.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for manufacturing, the method including processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step and measuring a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the first workpiece. The method also includes forming an output signal corresponding to the thickness of the field oxide feature. In addition, the method includes feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a predetermined threshold value.




In another aspect of the present invention, a computer-readable, program storage device is provided, encoded with instructions that, when executed by a computer, perform a method for manufacturing a workpiece, the method including processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step and measuring a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the first workpiece. The method also includes forming an output signal corresponding to the thickness of the field oxide feature. In addition, the method includes feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a predetermined threshold value.




In yet another aspect of the present invention, a computer programmed to perform a method of manufacturing is provided, the method including processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step and measuring a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the first workpiece. The method also includes forming an output signal corresponding to the thickness of the field oxide feature. In addition, the method includes feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a predetermined threshold value.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The invention may be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which the leftmost significant digit(s) in the reference numerals denote(s) the first figure in which the respective reference numerals appear, and in which:





FIGS. 1-26

illustrate schematically various embodiments of a method for manufacturing according to the present invention; and, more particularly:





FIGS. 1-2

,


5


-


12


,


14


-


15


and


17


illustrate schematically a flow chart for various embodiments of a method for manufacturing according to the present invention;





FIGS. 3-4

illustrate schematically various embodiments of field oxide (FOX) features used in various embodiments of a method for manufacturing according to the present invention; and





FIGS. 13

,


16


and


18


-


21


illustrate schematically various embodiments of displays used in various embodiments of a method for manufacturing according to the present invention;





FIG. 22

schematically illustrates a method for fabricating a semiconductor device practiced in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 23

schematically illustrates workpieces being processed using a nitride strip processing tool, using a plurality of control input signals, in accordance with the present invention;





FIGS. 24-25

schematically illustrate one particular embodiment of the process and tool in

FIG. 23

; and





FIG. 26

schematically illustrates one particular embodiment of the method of

FIG. 22

as may be practiced with the process and tool of FIGS.


24


-


25


.











While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS




Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.




Illustrative embodiments of a method for manufacturing according to the present invention are shown in

FIGS. 1-26

. As shown in

FIG. 1

, a workpiece


100


, such as a semiconducting substrate or wafer, having one or more process layers disposed thereon, is delivered to a nitride processing step


105


. The nitride processing step


105


may include nitride stripping and/or nitride etching, for example. The nitride stripping and/or nitride etching may be a wet chemical process involving hot aqueous phosphoric acid (H


3


PO


4


), for example.




As shown in

FIG. 2

, the workpiece


100


is sent from the nitride processing step


105


and delivered to a field oxide (FOX) thickness measuring step


110


. In the measuring step


110


, the FOX thickness of at least one feature on the workpiece


100


is measured by a metrology or measuring tool (not shown).




As shown in

FIG. 3

, the workpiece


100


may have a FOX feature


300


disposed thereon. The FOX feature


300


may be used for electrical isolation of semiconductor devices such as transistors (not shown) subsequently formed on the workpiece


100


. Alternatively, the FOX feature


300


may be formed on the workpiece


100


specifically as a test structure used to monitor the nitride stripping and/or nitride etching of the nitride processing step


105


. A silicon nitride (Si


3


N


4


) layer


310


may be formed above the workpiece


100


and adjacent the FOX feature


300


. The Si


3


N


4


layer


310


may be removed by the nitride stripping and/or nitride etching of the nitride processing step


105


. The Si


3


N


4


layer


310


may have a thickness τ in a range from approximately 1500-2000 Ångstroms (Å) before the nitride processing step


105


, and a thickness τ of about 0 Å subsequent to the nitride processing step


105


. Similarly, the FOX feature


300


may have a thickness t in a range from approximately 4000-5500 Å before the nitride processing step


105


, and a thickness t in a range from approximately 4000-5000 Å subsequent to the nitride processing step


105


. Typically, about 0-500 Å of the FOX feature


300


may be etched away in the nitride processing step


105


. In various illustrative embodiments of the present invention, a predetermined threshold thickness value of FOX features such as the FOX feature


300


may be in a range of approximately 4000-5000 Å, subsequent to the nitride processing step


105


.




As shown in

FIG. 4A

, the workpiece


100


may have several FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A, respectively, disposed thereon. One or more of the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A may be used for electrical isolation of semiconductor devices such as transistors (not shown) subsequently formed on the workpiece


100


. Alternatively, one or more of the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A may be formed on the workpiece


100


specifically as a test structure used to monitor the nitride stripping and/or nitride etching of the nitride processing step


105


. The FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A may have respective thicknesses t


1


, t


2


and t


3


in a range from approximately 4000-5000 Å subsequent to the nitride processing step


105


.




As shown in

FIG. 2

, in the FOX thickness measuring step


110


, the metrology or measuring tool (not shown) may measure the thickness t of the FOX feature


300


(see

FIG. 3

) disposed on the workpiece


100


, producing FOX data


115


indicative of the thickness t of the measured FOX feature


300


. In alternative embodiments, the metrology or measuring tool (not shown) in the FOX thickness measuring step


110


may measure the respective thicknesses t


1


, t


2


and t


3


of more than one of the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A (see

FIG. 4A

) disposed on the workpiece


100


, producing FOX data


115


indicative of the median and/or mean thickness of the measured FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A. In one illustrative embodiment, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to perform the FOX thickness measurements of the FOX features formed to have thickness t, producing sample thickness values t


1


, t


2


, . . . , t


m


, where m is the total number of the FOX features (similar to the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A in

FIG. 4A

) that are measured by the SEM (e.g., m=3 in FIG.


3


).




As discussed above, as consecutive lots of workpieces (such as silicon wafers with various process layers formed thereon) are processed through a conventional nitride stripping and/or etching process step, increasing silicon (Si) concentration in the stripping and/or etching bath causes the FOX also to etch in varying amounts. For example, when hot aqueous hosphoric acid (H


3


PO


4


) is used to selectively etch silicon nitride (Si


3


N


4


), the Si


3


N


4


etches way fairly steadily, at roughly ten times the initial etch rate of the FOX (SiO


2


). However, when the H


3


PO


4


bath is fresh and the Si concentration is relatively low, the initial etch rate of the FOX (SiO


2


) is much faster than the later etch rate of the FOX (SiO


2


), as the H


3


PO


4


bath ages and the Si concentration increases, in conventional nitride stripping. This causes the FOX thicknesses to increase with time, as the H


3


PO


4


bath ages and the Si concentration increases, in conventional nitride stripping. In particular, the FOX thicknesses typically vary from run to run and/or batch to batch, in conventional nitride stripping, as shown schematically by comparing

FIG. 4A

with FIG.


4


B.




As shown in

FIG. 4B

, a conventional workpiece


420


may have several FOX features


400


B,


405


B and


410


B, respectively, disposed thereon. The FOX features


400


B,


405


B and


410


B may have respective thicknesses T


1


, T


2


and T


3


that are each larger than the respective thicknesses t


1


, t


2


and t


3


of the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A disposed on the workpiece


100


, as shown in FIG.


4


A. The conventional workpiece


420


is shown in

FIG. 4B

as it would appear after conventional nitride stripping in an aged H


3


PO


4


bath, having an increased Si concentration, relative to the H


3


PO


4


bath in which the workpiece


100


, as shown in

FIG. 4A

, had been processed. By way of contrast, any of the various illustrative embodiments of the present invention reduce such FOX thickness variations from run to run and/or batch to batch.




As shown in

FIG. 5

, the FOX data


115


is sent from the FOX thickness measuring step


110


to an Advanced Process Control (APC) system monitor/controller


120


. In the APC system monitor/controller


120


, the FOX data


115


may be used to monitor and control the processing taking place in the nitride processing step


105


.




As shown in

FIG. 6

, a feedback control signal


125


may be sent from the APC system monitor/controller


120


to the nitride processing step


105


, for example, depending on the FOX data


115


sent from the FOX thickness measuring step


110


. The feedback control signal


125


may be used to adjust the processing performed in the nitride processing step


105


to adjust the thickness t of a FOX feature formed on a subsequent workpiece (not shown) processed in the nitride processing step


105


toward at least a predetermined threshold value. In one illustrative embodiment, the thickness t of the FOX feature formed on the subsequent workpiece (not shown) processed in the nitride processing step


105


may be in a range of approximately 4000-5000 Å. In various illustrative embodiments of the present invention, the predetermined threshold thickness value (of FOX features such as the FOX feature


300


) may be in a range of approximately 4000-5000 Å.




As shown in

FIG. 7

, one response to the feedback control signal


125


sent from the APC system monitor/controller


120


to the nitride processing step


105


may be to drain an old portion


130


of a chemical bath (not shown) used in the nitride processing step


105


into a waste outlet


135


. One of the factors contributing to the variation of the thickness t of the FOX feature


300


formed on the workpiece


100


is the concentration of silicon (Si) in the chemical bath (not shown) used in the nitride processing step


105


. By draining the old portion


130


of the chemical bath (not shown) into the waste outlet


135


, the concentration of Si may be reduced in a case where the chemical bath is not well stirred so that the concentration of Si may be greater toward the bottom of the chemical bath, for example. In one illustrative embodiment, the concentration of silicon (Si) after the old portion


130


has been drained into the waste outlet


135


may be in a range of approximately 10-100 parts per billion (ppb).




As shown in

FIG. 8

, another response to the feedback control signal


125


sent from the APC system monitor/controller


120


to the nitride processing step


105


may be to add new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) used in the nitride processing step


105


from a new chemical supply


145


. By adding the new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) from the new chemical supply


145


, the concentration of silicon (Si) may also be reduced, for example. In another illustrative embodiment, the concentration of Si after the new chemicals


140


have been added from the new chemical supply


145


may be in a range of approximately 10-100 parts per billion (ppb).




As shown in

FIG. 9

, yet another response to the feedback control signal


125


sent from the APC system monitor/controller


120


to the nitride processing step


105


may be to add the new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) from the new chemical supply


145


, and, if the chemical bath is substantially fill, also to drain the old portion


130


of the chemical bath (not shown) used in the nitride processing step


105


into the waste outlet


135


. By adding the new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) from the new chemical supply


145


, and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining the old portion


130


of the chemical bath (not shown) into the waste outlet


135


, the overall concentration of silicon (Si) may be reduced, for example. In yet another illustrative embodiment, the concentration of Si after the new chemicals


140


have been added from the new chemical supply


145


and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, after the old portion


130


has been drained into the waste outlet


135


, may be in a range of approximately 10-100 parts per billion (ppb).




The APC system monitor/controller


120


may be a preferred platform used in various illustrative embodiments of the present invention. In various illustrative embodiments, the APC system monitor/controller


120


may be part of a factory-wide software system. The APC system monitor/controller


120


also allows remote access and monitoring of the process performance. Furthermore, by utilizing the APC system monitor/controller


120


, data storage can be more convenient, more flexible, and less expensive than local data storage on local drives, for example. The APC system monitor/controller


120


allows for more sophisticated types of control because it provides a significant amount of flexibility in writing the necessary software code.




Deployment of the control strategies used in various illustrative embodiments of the present invention onto the APC system monitor/controller


120


may require a number of software components. In addition to components within the APC system monitor/controller


120


, a computer script may be written for each of the semiconductor manufacturing tools involved in the control system. When a semiconductor manufacturing tool in the control system is started in the semiconductor manufacturing fab, the semiconductor manufacturing tool may call upon a script to initiate the action that is required by a nitride processing step controller (not shown). The control methods are generally defined and performed in these scripts. The development of these scripts may involve a substantial portion of the development of a control system. Various illustrative embodiments using an APC system for implementing nitride strip/etching processing are described below in conjunction with

FIGS. 22-26

.




As shown in

FIG. 10

, the workpiece


100


is sent from the FOX thickness measuring step


110


to a residual FOX defect sensor


150


. In the residual FOX defect sensor


150


, residual FOX defects may be detected, generating a residual FOX defect count


155


. The workpiece


100


may be sent from the residual FOX defect sensor


150


for further processing and/or handling.




As shown in

FIG. 11

, the residual FOX defect count


155


is sent from the residual FOX defect sensor


150


to the APC system monitor/controller


120


. In the APC system monitor/controller


120


, the residual FOX defect count


155


may be used to monitor and control the processing taking place in the nitride processing step


105


. In one illustrative embodiment, the APC system monitor/controller


120


may use the residual FOX defect count


155


to send a feedback control signal


125


to the nitride processing step


105


. In another illustrative embodiment, the APC system monitor/controller


120


may use both the residual FOX defect count


155


(sent from the FOX defect sensor


150


) and the FOX data


115


(sent from the FOX thickness measuring step


110


) to send a feedback control signal


125


to the nitride processing step


105


.




As shown in

FIG. 11

, the response to the feedback control signal


125


sent from the APC system monitor/controller


120


to the nitride processing step


105


may be to add the new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) from the new chemical supply


145


, and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, also to drain the old portion


130


of the chemical bath (not shown) used in the nitride processing step


105


into the waste outlet


135


. By adding the new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) from the new chemical supply


145


, and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining the old portion


130


of the chemical bath (not shown) into the waste outlet


135


, the overall concentration of silicon (Si) may be reduced, for example. In one illustrative embodiment, the concentration of Si after the new chemicals


140


have been added from the new chemical supply


145


and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, after the old portion


130


has been drained into the waste outlet


135


, may be in a range of approximately 10-100 parts per billion (ppb).




As shown in

FIG. 12

, in addition to, and/or instead of, the feedback control signal


125


, output data


160


may be sent from the APC system monitor/controller


120


to a FOX thickness threshold data display step


165


. In the FOX thickness threshold data display step


165


, the output signal


160


may be displayed, for example, by being presented in the form of a graph, as illustrated in

FIG. 13

, showing the FOX thickness (measured in angstroms, Å) on the workpiece


100


plotted as a function of time (measured in seconds). In one illustrative embodiment, the FOX thickness displayed is the thickness t of the FOX feature


300


formed on the workpiece


100


. In another illustrative embodiment, the FOX thickness displayed is the median t


median


and/or average thickness t


average


of the thickness values t


1


, t


2


, . . . , t


m


, where m is the total number of the FOX features (similar to the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A in

FIG. 4A

) formed on the workpiece


100


.




As shown in

FIG. 13

, in one illustrative embodiment, the FOX thickness may be between the FOX underetch threshold


1300


(shown in dashed phantom) and the FOX overetch threshold


1305


(shown in dashed phantom) for a period of time. The FOX thickness may eventually cross the FOX overetch threshold


1305


(shown in dashed phantom) at the time


1310


(shown in dotted phantom).




The display of the FOX thickness in the FOX thickness threshold data display step


165


may be used to alert an engineer of the need to adjust the processing performed in the nitride processing step


105


to reduce the overall concentration of nitride, for example. The engineer may also adjust, for example, the FOX underetch threshold


1300


(shown in dashed phantom) and the FOX overetch threshold


1305


(shown in dashed phantom).




As shown in

FIG. 14

, a feedback control signal


170


may be sent from the FOX thickness threshold data display step


165


to the nitride processing step


105


. As shown in

FIG. 14

, the response to the feedback control signal


170


sent from the FOX thickness threshold data display step


165


to the nitride processing step


105


may be to add the new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) from the new chemical supply


145


, and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, also to drain the old portion


130


of the chemical bath (not shown) used in the nitride processing step


105


into the waste outlet


135


. By adding the new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) from the new chemical supply


145


, and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining the old portion


130


of the chemical bath (not shown) into the waste outlet


135


, the overall concentration of silicon (Si) may be reduced, for example. In one illustrative embodiment, the concentration of Si after the new chemicals


140


have been added from the new chemical supply


145


and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, after the old portion


130


has been drained into the waste outlet


135


, may be in a range of approximately 10-100 parts per billion (ppb).




As shown in

FIG. 15

, in addition to, and/or instead of, the feedback control signal


170


, defect counts


175


may be sent from the FOX thickness threshold data display step


165


to a defect count display step


180


. In the defect count display step


180


, the defect counts


175


may be displayed, for example, by being presented in the form of a histogram, as illustrated in

FIG. 16

, showing both the count number (defect counts


175


) and the types of defects represented by the output signal


160


. As shown in

FIG. 16

, in one illustrative embodiment, the number of residual FOX defects (shown shaded at


1600


) is about 80, in the locations scanned, for the duration of the scan.




The display of the number of residual FOX defects in the defect count display step


180


may be used to alert an engineer of the need to adjust the processing performed in the nitride processing step


105


to reduce the overall concentration of nitride, for example. The engineer may also alter and/or select, for example, the type of residual FOX defect whose defect counts


175


are to be displayed in the defect count display step


180


.




As shown in

FIG. 16

, a feedback control signal


185


may be sent from the defect count display step


180


to the nitride processing step


105


. As shown in

FIG. 16

, the response to the feedback control signal


185


sent from the defect count display step


180


to the nitride processing step


105


may be to add the new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) from the new chemical supply


145


, and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, also to drain the old portion


130


of the chemical bath (not shown) used in the nitride processing step


105


into the waste outlet


135


. By adding the new chemicals


140


to the chemical bath (not shown) from the new chemical supply


145


, and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining the old portion


130


of the chemical bath (not shown) into the waste outlet


135


, the overall concentration of silicon (Si) may be reduced, for example. In one illustrative embodiment, the concentration of Si after the new chemicals


140


have been added from the new chemical supply


145


and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, after the old portion


130


has been drained into the waste outlet


135


, may be in a range of approximately 10-100 parts per billion (ppb).




In one illustrative embodiment, in both the FOX thickness threshold data display step


165


and the defect count display step


180


, and/or by using the APC system monitor/controller


120


, the engineer may be provided with advanced process data monitoring capabilities, such as the ability to provide historical parametric data in a user-friendly format, as well as event logging, real-time graphical display of both current processing parameters and the processing parameters of the entire run, and remote, i.e., local site and worldwide, monitoring. These capabilities may engender more optimal control of critical processing parameters, such as throughput accuracy, stability and repeatability, processing temperatures, mechanical tool parameters, and the like. This more optimal control of critical processing parameters reduces this variability. This reduction in variability manifests itself as fewer within-run disparities, fewer run-to-run disparities and fewer tool-to-tool disparities. This reduction in the number of these disparities that can propagate means fewer deviations in product quality and performance. In such an illustrative embodiment of a method of manufacturing according to the present invention, a monitoring and diagnostics system may be provided that monitors this variability and optimizes control of critical parameters.




As shown in

FIG. 18

, in various illustrative embodiments, the FOX thickness may be the median t


median


of the thickness values t


1


i, t


2


, . . . , t


m


, where m is the total number of the FOX features (similar to the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A in

FIG. 4A

) formed on the workpiece


100


. For example, as shown in

FIG. 18

, using a Tukey “box and whiskers” plot, the FOX thickness measurements performed on the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A (see

FIG. 4A

) formed on the workpiece


100


may have a median value


1800


of approximately 800 Å. The median value


1800


of the FOX thickness measurements is the sample value at the midpoint of the FOX thickness measurements, so that half of the FOX thickness measurement values are less than or equal to the median value


1800


and half of the FOX thickness measurement values are greater than or equal to the median value


1800


.




As shown in

FIG. 18

, Tukey box and whiskers plots may be used to compare the FOX thickness measurement values taken using the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A (see

FIG. 4A

) formed on the workpiece


100


with FOX thickness measurement values taken using FOX features (not shown) formed on a workpiece


1810


(not shown), similar to the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A (see

FIG. 4A

) formed on the workpiece


100


, for example. The median value


1815


is approximately 800 Å for the FOX thickness measurements of the FOX features (not shown) formed on the workpiece


1810


(not shown), similar to the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A (see

FIG. 4A

) formed on the workpiece


100


.




Alternatively, the FOX thickness may be the average thickness t


average


of the thickness values t


1


, t


2


, . . . , t


m


, where m is the total number of the FOX features (similar to the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A in

FIG. 4A

) formed on the workpiece


100


. As shown in

FIG. 19

, using a Student's t-distribution plot


1900


, the FOX thickness measurement values taken using the FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A (see

FIG. 4A

) formed on the workpiece


100


may have a sample mean value


1905


of approximately 800 Å. The sample mean value


1905


of the FOX thickness measurements taken using FOX features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A (see

FIG. 4A

) is the sample average







x
_

=


1
m






i
=
1

m



x
i













of the FOX thickness measurements over all m of the features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A that are measured, where x


i


is the FOX thickness measurement of the ith of the features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A. Note that the number m of the features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A that are measured may be less than or equal to the total number M of the features


400


A,


405


A and


410


A on the workpiece


100


.




As shown in

FIG. 19

, Student's t-distribution plots


1900


and


1910


may be used to compare the sample mean value


1905


of the FOX thickness measurements (performed on the workpiece


100


) with the sample mean value


1905


of the FOX thickness measurements performed on the workpiece


1810


(not shown), for example. The sample mean value


1905


of approximately 800 Å of the FOX thickness measurements performed on the workpiece


1810


(not shown) is the sample average







y
_

=


1
n






j
=
1

n



y
j













of the FOX thickness measurements over all n of the features (not shown) that are measured on the workpiece


1810


(not shown), where y


j


is the FOX thickness measurement of the jth of the features (not shown) that are measured on the workpiece


1810


(not shown). Note that the number n of the features (not shown) that are measured on the workpiece


1810


(not shown) may be less than or equal to the total number T of the features (not shown) that are measured on the workpiece


1810


(not shown).




As shown in

FIG. 19

, the Student's t-distribution plots


1900


and


1910


may approach the Gaussian normal z-distribution plot


1915


as the number of features n and m becomes very large, for m>n>>about 25. The Gaussian normal z-distribution plot


1915


has the mean value


1905


(μ) given by the expressions









μ
=





1
m






i
=
1

m



x
i





=



1
m






i
=
1

m





x
i





=



1
m






i
=
1

m


μ


=


m
m


μ





and












μ
=





1
n






j
=
1

n



y
j





=



1
n






j
=
1

n





y
j





=



1
n






j
=
1

n


μ


=


n
n


μ





,


















in the limit m>n>>about 25, where x


i


(the FOX thickness measurement of the ith of the features on the workpiece


100


) and y


j


(the FOX thickness measurement of the jth of the features on the workpiece


1810


) are treated as independent random variables with means <x


i


>=μ=<y


j


> for 1≦i≦m and 1≦j≦n, and where the mean value


1905


(μ) may also be approximately 800 Å.




As shown in

FIG. 20

, using a Tukey “box and whiskers” plot, the FOX thickness measurements performed on the workpiece


100


may have the median value


1800


(see

FIG. 18

) contained within an interquartile range (IQR) box


2005


bounded by first and third quartile values


2010


and


2015


, respectively. Whiskers


2020


and


2025


may not extend beyond one and a half times the difference between the third and first quartiles


2015


and


2010


(1.5×IQR).




The first quartile value


2010


is the median value of the FOX thickness measurements that are less than or equal to the median value


1800


. The third quartile value


2015


is the median value of the FOX thickness measurements that are greater than or equal to the median value


1800


. The IQR is the difference between the third and first quartiles


2015


and


2010


. Any FOX thickness measurement values beyond the whiskers


2020


and


2025


are “outliers” and may not always be depicted in a Tukey box and whiskers plot.




As shown in

FIG. 20

, Tukey box and whiskers plots may be used to compare the FOX thickness measurement values taken on the workpiece


100


with the FOX thickness measurement values taken on the workpiece


1810


(not shown), for example. The FOX thickness measurements performed on the workpiece


1810


may have the median value


1815


(see

FIG. 18

) contained within an IQR box


2035


bounded by first and third quartile values


2040


and


2045


, respectively. Whiskers


2050


and


2055


may not extend beyond one and a half times the difference between the third and first quartiles


2045


and


2040


(1.5×IQR).




The first quartile value


2040


is the median value of the FOX thickness measurements that are less than or equal to the median value


1815


. The third quartile value


2045


is the median value of the FOX thickness measurements that are greater than or equal to the median value


1815


. The IQR is the difference between the third and first quartile values


2045


and


2040


. Any FOX thickness measurement values beyond the whiskers


2050


and


2055


are “outliers” and may not always be depicted in a Tukey box and whiskers plot.




Alternatively, as shown in

FIG. 21

, using the Student's t-distribution plot


1900


, the FOX thickness measurements performed on the workpiece


100


may have the sample mean value


1905


and a sample standard error


2100


, bounded by the sample mean value


1905


and a first standard error line


2105


. The sample standard error


2100


is








SE


(

x
_

)


=


s

m


=



1

m


(

m
-
1

)








i
=
1

m




(


x
i

-

x
_


)

2






,










where the sample standard deviation is






s
=



1

(

m
-
1

)







i
=
1

m




(


x
i

-

x
_


)

2














for the FOX thickness measurements taken over all m of the features that are measured on the workpiece


100


, where x


i


is the FOX thickness measurement of the ith FOX feature. Note that the number m of the FOX features that are measured may be less than or equal to the total number M of the FOX features on the workpiece


100


. The sample standard error


2100


for the FOX thickness measurements decreases as the number m (the number of the FOX features on the workpiece


100


that are measured) increases.




As shown in

FIG. 21

, Student's t-distribution plots


1900


and


1910


may be used to compare the FOX thickness measurement values taken on the workpiece


100


with the FOX thickness measurement values taken on the workpiece


1810


(not shown), for example. The FOX thickness measurements performed on the workpiece


1810


may have the sample mean value


1905


and a sample standard error


2110


, bounded by the sample mean value


1905


and a first standard error line


2115


. The sample standard error


2110


is








SE


(

y
_

)


=


s

n


=



1

n


(

n
-
1

)








j
=
1

n




(


y
j

-

y
_


)

2






,




where




s
=



1

(

n
-
1

)







j
=
1

n




(


y
j

-

y
_


)

2














for the FOX thickness measurements taken over all n of the FOX features that are measured on the workpiece


1810


, where y


j


is the FOX thickness measurement of the jth FOX feature. Note that the number n of the FOX features that are measured on the workpiece


1810


may be less than or equal to the total number T of the FOX features on the workpiece


1810


. The sample standard error


2110


for the FOX thickness measurements decreases as the number n (the number of the FOX features


820


on the workpiece


1810


that are measured) increases.




As shown in

FIG. 21

, the Student's t-distribution plots


1900


and


1910


may approach the Gaussian normal z-distribution plot


1915


as the number of features n and m becomes very large, for m>n>>about 25. The Gaussian normal z-distribution plot


1915


has a standard deviation


2120


(σ/m), bounded by the mean value


1905


(μ) and a first standard deviation line


2125


. The Gaussian normal standard deviation


2120


(σ/m) is given by the expression










σ

m


=






(





i
=
1

m




x
i

m


-
μ

)

2




1
2


=







i
=
1

m





(


x
i

-
μ

)

2


m
2






1
2









=




1
m



[




i
=
1

m






(


x
i

-
μ

)

2




]



1
2


=




1
m



[




i
=
1

m



σ
2


]



1
2


=


σ






m


m
















that is substantially equivalent to the normal standard deviation σ/(n) given by










σ

n


=






(





j
=
1

n




y
j

n


-
μ

)

2




1
2


=







j
=
1

n





(


y
j

-
μ

)

2


n
2






1
2









=




1
n



[




j
=
1

n






(


y
j

-
μ

)

2




]



1
2


=




1
n



[




j
=
1

n



σ
2


]



1
2


=


σ






n


n
















in the limit m>n>>about 25, where x


i


(the FOX thickness measurement of the ith FOX feature on the workpiece


100


) and y


j


(the FOX thickness measurement of the jth FOX feature on the workpiece


1810


) are treated as independent random variables with means <x


i


>=μ=<y


j


> and with variances <(x


i


−μ)


2


>=σ


2


=<(y


j


−μ)


2


> for 1≦i≦m and 1≦j≦n, and where the standard deviation


2120


(σ/m) may be approximately 150 Å and may also be substantially equivalent to the normal standard deviation σ/(n). Note that the independence means that











(





i
=
1

m




x
i

m


-
μ

)

2



=







i
=
1

m





(


x
i

-
μ

)

2


m
2





+

2







j
<
i







i
=
1

m





(


x
i

-
μ

)



(


x
j

-
μ

)



m
2

















and





that













j
<
i







i
=
1

m





(


x
i

-
μ

)



(


x
j

-
μ

)



m
2






=




j
<
i







i
=
1

m







(


x
i

-
μ

)



(


x
j

-
μ

)





m
2










=




j
<
i







i
=
1

m








(


x
i

-
μ

)







(


x
j

-
μ

)





m
2







and





that

















j
<
i







i
=
1

m







(


x
i

-
μ

)







(


x
j

-
μ

)





m
2




=




j
<
i







i
=
1

m





(




x
i



-


μ



)



(




x
j



-


μ



)



m
2










=





j
<
i







i
=
1

m





(

μ
-
μ

)



(

μ
-
μ

)



m
2




=
0.

















Similarly
,

note





that









(





j
=
1

n




y
j

n


-
μ

)

2



=







j
=
1

n





(


y
j

-
μ

)

2


n
2





+

2







i
<
j







j
=
1

n





(


y
i

-
μ

)



(


y
j

-
μ

)



n
2












and





that













i
<
j







j
=
1

n





(


y
i

-
μ

)



(


y
j

-
μ

)



n
2






=




i
<
j







j
=
1

n







(


y
i

-
μ

)



(


y
j

-
μ

)





n
2










=




i
<
j







j
=
1

n







(


y
i

-
μ

)







(


y
j

-
μ

)





n
2











and





that











i
<
j







j
=
1

n







(


y
i

-
μ

)







(


y
j

-
μ

)





n
2




=




i
<
j







j
=
1

n





(




y
i



-


μ



)



(




y
j



-


μ



)



n
2










=





i
<
j







j
=
1

n





(

μ
-
μ

)



(

μ
-
μ

)



n
2




=
0.















FIG. 22

illustrates one particular embodiment of a method


2200


practiced in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 23

illustrates one particular apparatus


2300


with which the method


2200


may be practiced. For the sake of clarity, and to further an understanding of the invention, the method


2200


shall be disclosed in the context of the apparatus


2300


. However, the invention is not so limited and admits wide variation, as is discussed further below.




Referring now to both

FIGS. 22 and 23

, a batch or lot of workpieces or wafers


2305


is being processed through a nitride strip processing tool


2310


. The nitride strip processing tool


2310


may be any nitride strip processing tool known to the art, provided it includes the requisite control capabilities. The nitride strip processing tool


2310


includes a nitride strip processing tool controller


2315


for this purpose. The nature and function of the nitride strip processing tool controller


2315


will be implementation specific. For instance, the nitride strip processing tool controller


2315


may control nitride strip control input parameters such as nitride stripping bath control input parameters. The nitride stripping bath control input parameters may include nitride strip control input parameters for adding hot aqueous phosphoric acid (H


3


PO


4


) to the bath used to selectively etch the silicon nitride (Si


3


N


4


), draining the bath, stirring the bath, and the like. Four workpieces


2305


are shown in

FIG. 23

, but the lot of workpieces or wafers, i.e., the “wafer lot,” may be any practicable number of wafers from one to any finite number.




The method


2200


begins, as set forth in box


2220


, by measuring a parameter characteristic of the nitride strip processing performed on the workpiece


2305


in the nitride strip processing tool


2310


. The nature, identity, and measurement of characteristic parameters will be largely implementation specific and even tool specific. For instance, capabilities for monitoring process parameters vary, to some degree, from tool to tool. Greater sensing capabilities may permit wider latitude in the characteristic parameters that are identified and measured and the manner in which this is done. Conversely, lesser sensing capabilities may restrict this latitude. For example, a metrology tool (not shown) may the FOX thickness of a workpiece


2305


, and/or an average of the FOX thicknesses of the workpieces


2305


in a lot, and the metrology tool may need to be calibrated, but this calibration may vary from wafer to wafer. The metrology tool by itself typically does not feed back the FOX thickness information to the nitride strip tool. The FOX thickness of a workpiece


2305


, and/or an average of the FOX thicknesses of the workpieces


2305


in a lot, is an illustrative example of a parameter characteristic of the nitride strip processing performed on the workpiece in the nitride strip processing tool


2310


. Another illustrative example of a parameter characteristic of the nitride strip processing performed on the workpiece in the nitride strip processing tool


2310


is the residual FOX defect count


155


detected by a residual FOX defect sensor


150


, as discussed above in the description of

FIGS. 10-11

.




Turning to

FIG. 23

, in this particular embodiment, the nitride strip process characteristic parameters are measured and/or monitored by tool sensors (not shown). The outputs of these tool sensors are transmitted to a computer system


2330


over a line


2320


. The computer system


2330


analyzes these sensor outputs to identify the characteristic parameters.




Returning, to

FIG. 22

, once the characteristic parameter is identified and measured, the method


2200


proceeds by modeling the measured and identified characteristic parameter, as set forth in box


2230


. The computer system


2330


in

FIG. 23

is, in this particular embodiment, programmed to model the characteristic parameter. The manner in which this modeling occurs will be implementation specific.




In the embodiment of

FIG. 23

, a database


2335


stores a plurality of models that might potentially be applied, depending upon which characteristic parameter is identified. This particular embodiment, therefore, requires some a priori knowledge of the characteristic parameters that might be measured. The computer system


2330


then extracts an appropriate model from the database


2335


of potential models to apply to the identified characteristic parameters. If the database


2335


does not include an appropriate model, then the characteristic parameter may be ignored, or the computer system


2330


may attempt to develop one, if so programmed. The database


2335


may be stored on any kind of computer-readable, program storage medium, such as an optical disk


2340


, a floppy disk


2345


, or a hard disk drive (not shown) of the computer system


2330


. The database


2335


may also be stored on a separate computer system (not shown) that interfaces with the computer system


2330


.




Modeling of the identified characteristic parameter may be implemented differently in alternative embodiments. For instance, the computer system


2330


may be programmed using some form of artificial intelligence to analyze the sensor outputs and controller inputs to develop a model on-the-fly in a real-time implementation. This approach might be a useful adjunct to the embodiment illustrated in

FIG. 23

, and discussed above, where characteristic parameters are measured and identified for which the database


2335


has no appropriate model.




The method


2200


of

FIG. 22

then proceeds by applying the model to modify a nitride strip control input parameter, as set forth in box


2240


. Depending on the implementation, applying the model may yield either a new value for the nitride strip control input parameter or a correction to the existing nitride strip control input parameter. The new nitride strip control input is then formulated from the value yielded by the model and is transmitted to the nitride strip processing tool controller


2315


over the line


2320


. The nitride strip processing tool controller


2315


then controls subsequent nitride strip process operations in accordance with the new nitride strip control inputs.




Some alternative embodiments may employ a form of feedback to improve the modeling of characteristic parameters. The implementation of this feedback is dependent on several disparate facts, including the tool's sensing capabilities and economics. One technique for doing this would be to monitor at least one effect of the model's implementation and update the model based on the effect(s) monitored. The update may also depend on the model. For instance, a linear model may require a different update than would a non-linear model, all other factors being the same.




As is evident from the discussion above, some features of the present invention are implemented in software. For instance, the acts set forth in the boxes


2220


-


2240


in

FIG. 22

are, in the illustrated embodiment, software-implemented, in whole or in part. Thus, some features of the present invention are implemented as instructions encoded on a computer-readable, program storage medium. The program storage medium may be of any type suitable to the particular implementation. However, the program storage medium will typically be magnetic, such as the floppy disk


2345


or the computer


2330


hard disk drive (not shown), or optical, such as the optical disk


2340


. When these instructions are executed by a computer, they perform the disclosed functions. The computer may be a desktop computer, such as the computer


2330


. However, the computer might alternatively be a processor embedded in the nitride strip processing tool


2310


. The computer might also be a laptop, a workstation, or a mainframe in various other embodiments. The scope of the invention is not limited by the type or nature of the program storage medium or computer with which embodiments of the invention might be implemented.




Thus, some portions of the detailed descriptions herein are, or may be, presented in terms of algorithms, functions, techniques, and/or processes. These terms enable those skilled in the art most effectively to convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. These terms are here, and are generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electromagnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated.




It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, and the like. All of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities and actions. Unless specifically stated otherwise, or as may be apparent from the discussion, terms such as “processing,” “computing,” “calculating,” “determining,” “displaying,” and the like, used herein refer to the action(s) and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic and/or mechanical computing device, that manipulates and transforms data, represented as physical (electromagnetic) quantities within the computer system's registers and/or memories, into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system's memories and/or registers and/or other such information storage, transmission and/or display devices.




Construction of an Illustrative Apparatus. An exemplary embodiment


2400


of the apparatus


2300


in

FIG. 23

is illustrated in

FIGS. 24-25

, in which the apparatus


2400


comprises a portion of an Advanced Process Control (“APC”) system.

FIGS. 24-25

are conceptualized, structural and functional block diagrams, respectively, of the apparatus


2400


. A set of processing steps is performed on a lot of wafers


2405


on a nitride strip processing tool


2410


. Because the apparatus


2400


is part of an APC system, the wafers


2405


are processed on a run-to-run basis. Thus, process adjustments are made and held constant for the duration of a run, based on run-level measurements or averages. A “run” may be a lot, a batch of lots, or even an individual wafer.




In this particular embodiment, the wafers


2405


are processed by the nitride strip processing tool


2410


and various operations in the process are controlled by a plurality of nitride strip control input signals on a line


2420


between the nitride strip processing tool


2410


and a workstation


2430


. Exemplary nitride strip control inputs for this embodiment might include nitride stripping bath control input parameters for adding hot aqueous phosphoric acid (H


3


PO


4


) to the bath used to selectively etch the silicon nitride (Si


3


N


4


), draining the bath, stirring the bath, and the like.




When a process step in the nitride strip processing tool


2410


is concluded, the semiconductor wafers


2405


being processed in the nitride strip processing tool


2410


is examined in a review station


2417


. The nitride strip control inputs generally affect the FOX thickness of the semiconductor wafers


2405


and, hence, the variability and properties of the dielectric film etched/deposited by the nitride strip processing tool


2410


on the wafers


2405


. Once errors are determined from the examination after the run of a lot of wafers


2405


, the nitride strip control inputs on the line


2420


are modified for a subsequent run of a lot of wafers


2405


. Modifying the control signals on the line


2420


is designed to improve the next process step in the nitride strip processing tool


2410


. The modification is performed in accordance with one particular embodiment of the method


2200


set forth in

FIG. 22

, as described more fully below. Once the relevant nitride strip control input signals for the nitride strip processing tool


2410


are updated, the nitride strip control input signals with new settings are used for a subsequent run of semiconductor devices.




Referring now to both

FIGS. 24 and 25

, the nitride strip processing tool


2410


communicates with a manufacturing framework comprising a network of processing modules. One such module is an APC system manager


2540


resident on the computer


2440


. This network of processing modules constitutes the APC system. The nitride strip processing tool


2410


generally includes an equipment interface


2510


and a sensor interface


2515


. A machine interface


2530


resides on the workstation


2430


. The machine interface


2530


bridges the gap between the APC framework, e.g., the APC system manager


2540


, and the equipment interface


2510


. Thus, the machine interface


2530


interfaces the nitride strip processing tool


2410


with the APC framework and supports machine setup, activation, monitoring, and data collection. The sensor interface


2515


provides the appropriate interface environment to communicate with external sensors such as LabView® or other sensor bus-based data acquisition software. Both the machine interface


2530


and the sensor interface


2515


use a set of functionalities (such as a communication standard) to collect data to be used. The equipment interface


2510


and the sensor interface


2515


communicate over the line


2420


with the machine interface


2530


resident on the workstation


2430


.




More particularly, the machine interface


2530


receives commands, status events, and collected data from the equipment interface


2510


and forwards these as needed to other APC components and event channels. In turn, responses from APC components are received by the machine interface


2530


and rerouted to the equipment interface


2510


. The machine interface


2530


also reformats and restructures messages and data as necessary. The machine interface


2530


supports the startup/shutdown procedures within the APC System Manager


2540


. It also serves as an APC data collector, buffering data collected by the equipment interface


2510


, and emitting appropriate data collection signals.




In the particular embodiment illustrated, the APC system is a factory-wide software system, but this is not necessary to the practice of the invention. The control strategies taught by the present invention can be applied to virtually any semiconductor nitride strip processing tool on a factory floor. Indeed, the present invention may be simultaneously employed on multiple nitride strip processing tools in the same factory or in the same fabrication process. The APC framework permits remote access and monitoring of the process performance. Furthermore, by utilizing the APC framework, data storage can be more convenient, more flexible, and less expensive than data storage on local drives. However, the present invention may be employed, in some alternative embodiments, on local drives.




The illustrated embodiment deploys the present invention onto the APC framework utilizing a number of software components. In addition to components within the APC framework, a computer script is written for each of the semiconductor nitride strip processing tools involved in the control system. When a semiconductor nitride strip processing tool in the control system is started in the semiconductor manufacturing fab, the semiconductor nitride strip processing tool generally calls upon a script to initiate the action that is required by the nitride strip processing tool controller. The control methods are generally defined and performed using these scripts. The development of these scripts can comprise a significant portion of the development of a control system.




In this particular embodiment, there are several separate software scripts that perform the tasks involved in controlling the nitride strip processing operation. There is one script for the nitride strip processing tool


2410


, including the review station


2417


and the nitride strip processing tool controller


2415


. There is also a script to handle the actual data capture from the review station


2417


and another script that contains common procedures that can be referenced by any of the other scripts. There is also a script for the APC system manager


2540


. The precise number of scripts, however, is implementation specific and alternative embodiments may use other numbers of scripts.




Operation of an Illustrative Apparatus.

FIG. 26

illustrates one particular embodiment


2600


of the method


2200


in FIG.


22


. The method


2600


may be practiced with the apparatus


2400


illustrated in

FIGS. 24-25

, but the invention is not so limited. The method


2600


may be practiced with any apparatus that may perform the functions set forth in FIG.


26


. Furthermore, the method


2200


in

FIG. 22

may be practiced in embodiments alternative to the method


2600


in FIG.


26


.




Referring now to all of

FIGS. 24-26

, the method


2600


begins with processing a lot of wafers


2405


through a nitride strip processing tool


2410


, as set forth in box


2610


. In this particular embodiment, the nitride strip processing tool


2410


has been initialized for processing by the APC system manager


2540


through the machine interface


2530


and the equipment interface


2510


. In this particular embodiment, before the nitride strip processing tool


2410


is run, the APC system manager script is called to initialize the nitride strip processing tool


2410


. At this step, the script records the identification number of the nitride strip processing tool


2410


and the lot number of the wafers


2405


. The identification number is then stored against the lot number in a data store


2460


. The rest of the script, such as the APCData call and the Setup and StartMachine calls, are formulated with blank or dummy data in order to force the machine to use default settings.




As part of this initialization, the initial setpoints for nitride strip control are provided to the nitride strip processing tool controller


2415


over the line


2420


. These initial setpoints may be determined and implemented in any suitable manner known to the art. In the particular embodiment illustrated, nitride strip controls are implemented by control threads. Each control thread acts like a separate controller and is differentiated by various process conditions. For nitride strip control, the control threads are separated by a combination of different conditions. These conditions may include, for example, the semiconductor nitride strip processing tool


2410


currently processing the wafer lot, the semiconductor product, the semiconductor manufacturing operation, and one or more of the semiconductor processing tools (not shown) that previously processed the semiconductor wafer lot.




Control threads are separated because different process conditions affect nitride strip error differently. By isolating each of the process conditions into its own corresponding control thread, the nitride strip error can become a more accurate portrayal of the conditions in which a subsequent semiconductor wafer lot in the control thread will be processed. Since the error measurement is more relevant, changes to the nitride strip control input signals based upon the error will be more appropriate.




The control thread for the nitride strip control scheme depends upon the current nitride strip processing tool, current operation, the product code for the current lot, and the identification number at a previous processing step. The first three parameters are generally found in the context information that is passed to the script from the nitride strip processing tool


2410


. The fourth parameter is generally stored when the lot is previously processed. Once all four parameters are defined, they are combined to form the control thread name; NITR


02


_OPER


01


_PROD


01


_NITR


01


is an example of a control thread name. The control thread name is also stored in correspondence to the wafer lot number in the data store


2460


.




Once the lot is associated with a control thread name, the initial settings for that control thread are generally retrieved from the data store


2460


. There are at least two possibilities when the call is made for the information. One possibility is that there are no settings stored under the current control thread name. This can happen when the control thread is new, or if the information was lost or deleted. In these cases, the script initializes the control thread assuming that there is no error associated with it and uses the target values of the nitride strip errors as the nitride strip control input settings. It is preferred that the controllers use the default machine settings as the initial settings. By assuming some settings, the nitride strip errors can be related back to the control settings in order to facilitate feedback control.




Another possibility is that the initial settings are stored under the control thread name. In this case, one or more wafer lots have been processed under the same control thread name as the current wafer lot, and have also been measured for nitride strip error using the review station


2417


. When this information exists, the nitride strip control input signal settings are retrieved from the data store


2460


. These settings are then downloaded to the nitride strip processing tool


2410


.




The wafers


2405


are processed through the nitride strip processing tool


2410


. This includes, in the embodiment illustrated, dielectric film or layer etch and/or deposition and/or etch/deposition. The wafers


2405


are measured on the review station


2417


after their nitride strip processing on the nitride strip processing tool


2410


. The review station


2417


examines the wafers


2405


after they are processed for a number of errors. The data generated by the instruments of the review station


2417


is passed to the machine interface


2530


via sensor interface


2515


and the line


2420


. The review station script begins with a number of APC commands for the collection of data. The review station script then locks itself in place and activates a data available script. This script facilitates the actual transfer of the data from the review station


2417


to the APC framework. Once the transfer is completed, the script exits and unlocks the review station script. The interaction with the review station


2417


is then generally complete.




As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure, the data generated by the review station


2417


should be preprocessed for use. Review stations, such as KLA review stations, provide the control algorithms for measuring the control error. Each of the error measurements, in this particular embodiment, corresponds to one of the nitride strip control input signals on the line


2420


in a direct manner. Before the error can be utilized to correct the nitride strip control input signal, a certain amount of preprocessing is generally completed.




For example, preprocessing may include outlier rejection. Outlier rejection is a gross error check ensuring that the received data is reasonable in light of the historical performance of the process. This procedure involves comparing each of the nitride strip errors to its corresponding predetermined boundary parameter. In one embodiment, even if one of the predetermined boundaries is exceeded, the error data from the entire semiconductor wafer lot is generally rejected.




To determine the limits of the outlier rejection, thousands of actual semiconductor manufacturing fabrication (“fab”) data points are collected. The standard deviation for each error parameter in this collection of data is then calculated. In one embodiment, for outlier rejection, nine times the standard deviation (both positive and negative) is generally chosen as the predetermined boundary. This was done primarily to ensure that only the points that are significantly outside the normal operating conditions of the process are rejected.




Preprocessing may also smooth the data, which is also known as filtering. Filtering is important because the error measurements are subject to a certain amount of randomness, such that the error significantly deviates in value. Filtering the review station data results in a more accurate assessment of the error in the nitride strip control input signal settings. In one embodiment, the nitride strip control scheme utilizes a filtering procedure known as an Exponentially-Weighted Moving Average (“EWMA”) filter, although other filtering procedures can be utilized in this context.




One embodiment for the EWMA filter is represented by Equation (1):






AVG


N




=W*M




C


+(1


−W


)*AVG


P


  (1)






where




AVG


N


≡the new EWMA average;




W≡a weight for the new average (AVG


N


);




M


C


≡the current measurement; and




AVG


P


≡the previous EWMA average.




The weight is an adjustable parameter that can be used to control the amount of filtering and is generally between zero and one. The weight represents the confidence in the accuracy of the current data point. If the measurement is considered accurate, the weight should be close to one. If there were a significant amount of fluctuations in the process, then a number closer to zero would be appropriate.




In one embodiment, there are at least two techniques for utilizing the EWMA filtering process. The first technique uses the previous average, the weight, and the current measurement as described above. Among the advantages of utilizing the first implementation are ease of use and minimal data storage. One of the disadvantages of utilizing the first implementation is that this method generally does not retain much process information. Furthermore, the previous average calculated in this manner would be made up of every data point that preceded it, which may be undesirable. The second technique retains only some of the data and calculates the average from the raw data each time.




The manufacturing environment in the semiconductor manufacturing fab presents some unique challenges. The order that the semiconductor wafer lots are processed through a nitride strip processing tool may not correspond to the order in which they are read on the review station. This could lead to the data points being added to the EWMA average out of sequence. Semiconductor wafer lots may be analyzed more than once to verify the error measurements. With no data retention, both readings would contribute to the EWMA average, which may be an undesirable characteristic. Furthermore, some of the control threads may have low volume, which may cause the previous average to be outdated such that it may not be able to accurately represent the error in the nitride strip control input signal settings.




The nitride strip processing tool controller


2415


, in this particular embodiment, uses limited storage of data to calculate the EWMA filtered error, i.e., the first technique. Wafer lot data, including the lot number, the time the lot was processed, and the multiple error estimates, are stored in the data store


2460


under the control thread name. When a new set of data is collected, the stack of data is retrieved from data store


2460


and analyzed. The lot number of the current lot being processed is compared to those in the stack. If the lot number matches any of the data present there, the error measurements are replaced. Otherwise, the data point is added to the current stack in chronological order, according to the time periods when the lots were processed. In one embodiment, any data point within the stack that is over 258 hours old is removed. Once the aforementioned steps are complete, the new filter average is calculated and stored to data store


2460


.




Thus, the data is collected and preprocessed, and then processed to generate an estimate of the current errors in the nitride strip control input signal settings. First, the data is passed to a compiled Matlab® plug-in that performs the outlier rejection criteria described above. The inputs to a plug-in interface are the multiple error measurements and an array containing boundary values. The return from the plug-in interface is a single toggle variable. A nonzero return denotes that it has failed the rejection criteria, otherwise the variable returns the default value of zero and the script continues to process.




After the outlier rejection is completed, the data is passed to the EWMA filtering procedure. The controller data for the control thread name associated with the lot is retrieved, and all of the relevant operation upon the stack of lot data is carried out. This includes replacing redundant data or removing older data. Once the data stack is adequately prepared, it is parsed into ascending time-ordered arrays that correspond to the error values. These arrays are fed into the EWMA plug-in along with an array of the parameter required for its execution. In one embodiment, the return from the plug-in is comprised of the six filtered error values.




Returning to

FIG. 26

, data preprocessing includes measuring a characteristic parameter in a nitride strip operation, such as workpiece


2405


FOX thickness, arising from nitride strip processing control of the nitride strip processing tool


2410


, as set forth in box


2620


. Known, potential characteristic parameters may be identified by characteristic data patterns or may be identified as known consequences of modifications to control input parameters. The example of how changes in silicon (Si) concentration in the nitride stripping bath affect FOX thickness variability given above falls into this latter category.




The next step in the control process is to calculate the new settings for the nitride strip processing tool controller


2415


of the nitride strip processing tool


2410


. The previous settings for the control thread corresponding to the current wafer lot are retrieved from the data store


2460


. This data is paired along with the current set of nitride strip errors. The new settings are calculated by calling a compiled Matlab® plug-in. This application incorporates a number of inputs, performs calculations in a separate execution component, and returns a number of outputs to the main script. Generally, the inputs of the Matlab® plug-in are the nitride strip control input signal settings, the review station errors, an array of parameters that are necessary for the control algorithm, and a currently unused flag error. The outputs of the Matlab® plug-in are the new controller settings, calculated in the plug-in according to the controller algorithm described above.




A nitride strip process engineer or a control engineer, who generally determines the actual form and extent of the control action, can set the parameters. They include the threshold values, maximum step sizes, controller weights, and target values. Once the new parameter settings are calculated, the script stores the setting in the data store


2460


such that the nitride strip processing tool


2410


can retrieve them for the next wafer lot to be processed. The principles taught by the present invention can be implemented into other types of manufacturing frameworks.




Returning again to

FIG. 26

, the calculation of new settings includes, as set forth in box


2630


, modeling the identified characteristic parameter. This modeling may be performed by the Matlab® plug-in. In this particular embodiment, only known, potential characteristic parameters are modeled and the models are stored in a database


2435


accessed by a machine interface


2530


. The database


2435


may reside on the workstation


2430


, as shown, or some other part of the APC framework. For instance, the models might be stored in the data store


2460


managed by the APC system manager


2540


in alternative embodiments. The model will generally be a mathematical model, i e., an equation describing how the change(s) in nitride stripping bath control(s) affects the nitride strip performance and the FOX thickness variability from wafer to wafer and/or from run to run, and the like.




The particular model used will be implementation specific, depending upon the particular nitride strip processing tool


2410


and the particular characteristic parameter being modeled. Whether the relationship in the model is linear or non-linear will be dependent on the particular parameters involved.




The new settings are then transmitted to and applied by the nitride strip processing tool controller


2415


. Thus, returning now to

FIG. 26

, once the identified characteristic parameter is modeled, the model is applied to modify at least one nitride stripping bath control input parameter, as set forth in box


2640


. In this particular embodiment, the machine interface


2530


retrieves the model from the database


2435


, plugs in the respective value(s), and determines the necessary change(s) in the nitride stripping bath control input parameter(s). The change is then communicated by the machine interface


2530


to the equipment interface


2510


over the line


2420


. The equipment interface


2510


then implements the change.




The present embodiment furthermore provides that the models be updated. This includes, as set forth in boxes


2650


-


2660


of

FIG. 26

, monitoring at least one effect of modifying the nitride stripping bath control input parameters (box


2650


) and updating the applied model (box


2660


) based on the effect(s) monitored. For instance, various aspects of the nitride strip processing tool


2410


's operation will change as the hot aqueous phosphoric acid (H


3


PO


4


) bath, used to selectively etch silicon nitride (Si


3


N


4


) in the nitride strip processing tool


2410


, ages. By monitoring the effect of the nitride stripping bath change(s) implemented as a result of the characteristic parameter (e.g., workpiece


2405


FOX thickness and/or residual FOX defect count


155


) measurement, the necessary value could be updated to yield superior performance.




As noted above, this particular embodiment implements an APC system. Thus, changes are implemented “between” lots. The actions set forth in the boxes


2620


-


2660


are implemented after the current lot is processed and before the second lot is processed, as set forth in box


2670


of FIG.


26


. However, the invention is not so limited. Furthermore, as noted above, a lot may constitute any practicable number of wafers from one to several thousand (or practically any finite number). What constitutes a “lot” is implementation specific, and so the point of the fabrication process in which the updates occur will vary from implementation to implementation.




Any of the above-disclosed embodiments of a method of manufacturing according to the present invention enables the use of central values and spreads of FOX thickness measurements sent from a measuring tool to make run-to-run processing tool adjustments, either manually and/or automatically, to improve and/or better control the yield. Additionally, any of the above-disclosed embodiments of a method of manufacturing according to the present invention enables semiconductor device fabrication with increased device density and precision, increased efficiency and increased signal-to-noise ratio for the metrology tools, enabling a streamlined and simplified process flow, thereby decreasing the complexity and lowering the costs of the manufacturing process and increasing throughput.




Any of the above-disclosed embodiments of a method of manufacturing according to the present invention enables the monitoring and control of the FOX thickness following a nitride stripping and/or etching process step. As consecutive lots of workpieces (such as silicon wafers with various process layers formed thereon) are processed through a nitride stripping and/or etching process step, any of the above-disclosed embodiments of a method of manufacturing according to the present invention enables the monitoring and control of the silicon concentration in the stripping and/or etching bath, decreasing the FOX thickness variations. In particular, the FOX thickness will be more uniform from run to run and/or batch to batch, leading to a decreased number of residual FOX defects, further raising the workpiece throughput and further decreasing the workpiece manufacturing costs.




The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.



Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing, the method comprising:processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step; measuring a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the first workpiece; forming an output signal corresponding to the thickness of the field oxide feature; and feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a threshold value.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein feeding back the control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on the second workpiece in the nitride processing step includes adding fresh chemicals to a chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining a portion of the chemical bath.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained based on the output signal.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained and determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 6. A method of manufacturing, the method comprising:processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step; measuring a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the first workpiece; detecting residual field oxide defects on the first workpiece; forming an output signal corresponding to the thickness of the field oxide feature and the residual field oxide defects; and feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a threshold value and to reduce residual field oxide defects on the second workpiece.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein feeding back the control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on the second workpiece in the nitride processing step includes adding fresh chemicals to a chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining a portion of the chemical bath.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained based on the output signal.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained and determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 11. A method of manufacturing, the method comprising:processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step; measuring thicknesses of a plurality of field oxide features formed on the first workpiece; forming an output signal corresponding to the thicknesses of the plurality of field oxide features; and feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a predetermined threshold value.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein feeding back the control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on the second workpiece in the nitride processing step includes adding fresh chemicals to a chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining a portion of the chemical bath.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained based on the output signal.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, wherein adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained and determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 16. A method of manufacturing, the method comprising:processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step; measuring thicknesses of a plurality of field oxide features formed on the first workpiece; detecting residual field oxide defects on the first workpiece; forming an output signal corresponding to the thicknesses of the plurality of field oxide features and the residual field oxide defects; and feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a predetermined threshold value and to reduce residual field oxide defects on the second workpiece.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein feeding back the control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on the second workpiece in the nitride processing step includes adding fresh chemicals to a chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining a portion of the chemical bath.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained based on the output signal.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 20. The method of claim 17, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained and determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 21. A computer-readable, program storage device, encoded with instructions that, when executed by a computer, perform a method for manufacturing a workpiece, the method comprising:processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step; measuring a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the first workpiece; forming an output signal corresponding to the thickness of the field oxide feature; and feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a predetermined threshold value.
  • 22. The device of claim 21, wherein feeding back the control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on the second workpiece in the nitride processing step includes adding fresh chemicals to a chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining a portion of the chemical bath.
  • 23. The device of claim 22, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained based on the output signal.
  • 24. The device of claim 22, wherein adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 25. The device of claim 22, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained and determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 26. A computer programmed to perform a method of manufacturing, the method comprising:processing a first workpiece in a nitride processing step; measuring a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the first workpiece; forming an output signal corresponding to the thickness of the field oxide feature; and feeding back a control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on a second workpiece in the nitride processing step to adjust a thickness of a field oxide feature formed on the second workpiece toward at least a predetermined threshold value.
  • 27. The computer of claim 26, wherein feeding back the control signal based on the output signal to adjust processing performed on the second workpiece in the nitride processing step includes adding fresh chemicals to a chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and, if the chemical bath is substantially full, draining a portion of the chemical bath.
  • 28. The computer of claim 27, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained based on the output signal.
  • 29. The computer of claim 27, wherein adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
  • 30. The computer of claim 27, wherein draining the portion of the chemical bath used in the nitride processing step and adding the fresh chemicals to the chemical bath includes determining the portion of the chemical bath to be drained and determining an amount of the fresh chemicals based on the output signal.
US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
5126028 Hurwitt et al. Jun 1992 A
5131752 Yu et al. Jul 1992 A
5270222 Moslehi Dec 1993 A
5503707 Maung et al. Apr 1996 A
5622636 Huh et al. Apr 1997 A
5779927 Lo Jul 1998 A
5955139 Iturralde Sep 1999 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Article entitled, “In-Situ Chemical Concentration Control for Wafer Wet Cleaning”; authors Ismail Kashkoush, Rich Novak and Eric Brause; published in the May/Jun. 1998 Journal of the IEST; pp. 24-30.