The invention relates to a method of allocating a virtual register stack in a stack machine as well as to a corresponding stack machine, computer program, data carrier, and data structure.
In computer science, computer engineering, and programming language implementations, by stack machine is meant a type of processor whose instructions operate on a pushdown stack rather than on registers. Conventional stack machines typically have a stack of unlimited size and are either implemented in silicon or simulated by software on a standard register machine. As most machine instruction set architectures (ISAs) define only a finite number of so-called architected registers, conventional stack machines suffer performance penalties resulting from inefficient stack-register mapping. Stack-oriented programming languages such as Forth, RPL, and various assembly languages rely heavily on such stack machine implementations.
A known silicon-based stack machine implementation has been disclosed in Hand, Tom. “The Harris RTX 2000 Microcontroller.” Journal of Forth Application and Research 6.1 (1990): 5-13. For a discussion of register allocation methods for software-simulated stack machines within the context of compiler design, see SHANNON, Mark; BAILEY, Chris. Global Stack Allocation-Register Allocation for Stack Machines. In: Proceedings of the Euroforth Conference. 2006.
The invention as claimed is hereinafter disclosed in such a way that the technical problem with which it deals can be appreciated and the solution can be understood.
The problem to be solved is to seek an alternative to known instruction set architectures which provides the same or similar effects or is more cost-effective.
To elucidate the nature of the solution, reference is made to the characterizing portion of the independent claims.
The invention gives rise to efficient data processing, efficient data storage, and enhanced security.
The invention introduces an abstraction of the processor-specifically architected and named general-purpose registers that are key design elements of all known state-of-the-art processors and ISAs. (These general-purpose registers hereinafter will be plainly referred to as “registers” and distinguished from special-purpose registers that hold program state such as a stack pointer or correspond to specialized hardware elements.) To this end, an embodiment creates a universally abstract type of register which is declared in a virtual register space and addressed by ISA opcodes by means of virtual addresses (as opposed to state-of-the-art individual “register names”). Within this meaning, the invention defines a stack machine comprising a fully addressable virtual register stack and ISA.
As
101002=2010.
The overall memory organization scheme of
Considering the number of physical registers of that unit, the topmost elements (11)—in this case, a maximum of four such elements at any given time—of the virtual register stack (10) are allocated in the corresponding segment (12) of the register file (17—
Each element of the virtual register stack (10) is uniquely addressable by a zero-based index (15). To physically allocate that element, its respective index (15) is mapped by bitwise logical conjunction—an operation referred to in the art as “bit-masking”—with the unit's bitmask (RB) before undergoing bitwise logical disjunction with its offset (RO). Per this mechanism, for instance, the index 710=001112 would be mapped to physical register
(001112 AND 000112) OR 101002=000112 OR 101002=101112=2310.
Consequently, the virtual register #7 addressed by this index is allocated in physical register #23. It is to be noted however that there is by no means a one-to-one correspondence between virtual and physical registers throughout the entire runtime of a process, as physical register #23 had previously been used to store virtual register #3 and—in future cycles beyond the scope of
This approach bears the advantage that the respective segment (12) of the register file (17) is organized like a ring buffer, sometimes referred to as a circular buffer, circular queue, or cyclic buffer. Hence, there is no need to shift or shuffle the contents of the segment (12) when elements are pushed onto or popped from the virtual register stack (10). Further, virtual registers located near the stack-top—which are likely to be accessed as operands by the machine's arithmetic logic unit—tend to be stored in the readily accessible register file (17) as opposed to slower and less energy-efficient cache or even off-chip memory. The stack machine invented here thus exhibits an overall improved energy efficiency and performance that renders it suitable even for hard real-time applications. In use cases that impose less stringent restrictions, an embodiment of the invention still allows for reduced energy consumption as smaller register files are required to meet the same runtime objectives.
The overall memory organization and data handling scheme of
Each level of the cache hierarchy (13) further partly serves as backup for all lower levels of said cache hierarchy including “cache level 0”, meaning the register file (17) itself. In this respect, the pertinent memory locations (24) constitute a dual use shadow buffer which under steady-state process runtime conditions is used for lazy store and load operations and during process unload from its virtual processing unit is reused as a backup storage medium retaining the virtual registers evicted from the lower levels of the cache hierarchy whereas upon process reload said virtual registers in said lower levels of the cache hierarchy are restored from said backup storage medium. Note that process unload and the associated reload may be partial, meaning that not all lower levels of the register cache hierarchy need to be evicted and restored thereby allowing for runtime performance against memory use tradeoffs during process switches.
Note also that with exception of the highest level of a given cache hierarchy scheme each lower cache level—including “cache level 0”, register file—may hold zero virtual registers (11). As a consequence, any process may—but need not to—own a segment (12) of the register file which permits access to high performance features like parallel multiport access of e. g. multiple arithmetic logic units to the virtual register stack and associated ILP (instruction level parallelism). According to the invention, processes hence can be precisely fine-tuned to their respective register performance requirements, and it is even possible to build stack machines for low-end microcontroller applications that have no register file at all.
At application software level, only the boundless virtual register space common to all embodiments of the invention is visible while the details of the allocation of the virtual registers in the hardware may vary from processor type to type, from special register setup to setup, and even during program runtime without any effect or influence to the application software layer. In this meaning, application software can be compiled in hardware-abstract form directly to what in compiler technology is called a LLVM (Low Level Virtual Machine), thereby strictly decoupling a purely algorithmic software domain from its physical hardware implementation and configuration domain.
Said LLVM approach bears the advantage that an universal interface between computer software and hardware can be constructed defined by a virtual instruction set architecture (VISA) that is common to the whole computer class defined by the invention in such a way that a program written for any embodiment of said class by principle will run on any other embodiment of said class, not only with respect to hardware manufacturer, performance class, and application type (software portability) but also with respect to time (software persistence), as hardware technologies may be new, further developed, changed, improved, or abandoned without having the side-effect of rendering software written for an earlier technology grade of said computer class obsolete (software backward and forward compatibility).
The invention may be applied, inter alia, throughout the semiconductor industry.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/054532 | 2/27/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/144728 | 8/31/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4525780 | Bratt et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4575795 | Boothroyd et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
5107457 | Hayes et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5280614 | Munroe et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5325496 | Hays et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5509131 | Smith et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5564031 | Amerson | Oct 1996 | A |
5644709 | Austin | Jul 1997 | A |
5852726 | Lin | Dec 1998 | A |
58550101 | Wavish | Dec 1998 | |
6035391 | Isaman | Mar 2000 | A |
6574721 | Christenson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6886085 | Shuf et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
8996807 | Joshi | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9032174 | Nishiguchi | May 2015 | B2 |
9798873 | Glew et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10146707 | Kawai et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
20010044891 | McGrath et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020144091 | Widigen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030037037 | Adams et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065929 | Milliken | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030154363 | Soltis, Jr. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040003208 | Damron | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015876 | Applin | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050102494 | Grochowski | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108497 | Bridges et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050257051 | Richard | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060020946 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070106885 | Rychlik | May 2007 | A1 |
20080104325 | Narad | May 2008 | A1 |
20080222397 | Wilkerson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100161948 | Abdallah | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20140281398 | Rash et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150293767 | Michishita et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20180004678 | Bogusz et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0676691 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0793179 | Sep 1997 | EP |
1764682 | Mar 2007 | EP |
2211285 | Jul 2010 | EP |
1981002477 | Sep 1981 | WO |
2007048128 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/054532 dated May 18, 2017. |
Hand, Tom, “The Harris RTX 2000 Microcontroller”, Journal of Forth Application and Research, (1990), vol. 6.1, pp. 5-13. |
Wichtel et al.: “Mondrix: Memory Isolation for Linux Using Mondriaan Memory Protection”, SOSP'05, Oct. 23-26, 2005, Brighton, United Kingdom, Oct. 23, 2005 (Oct. 23, 2005),—Oct. 26, 2005 (Oct. 26, 2005), pp. 31-44, XP040029779, ACM, 2 Penn Plaza, Suite701—New York USA. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/054535 dated May 31, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190065198 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2016/000345 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 16079628 | US | |
Parent | PCT/EP2016/000344 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | PCT/EP2016/000345 | US |