1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to electrical corona discharge devices and in particular to methods of and devices for fluid acceleration to provide velocity and momentum to a fluid, especially to air, through the use of ions and electrical fields.
2. Description of the Related Art
The prior art as described in a number of patents (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,210,847 of Spurgin and 4,231,766 of Shannon, et al.) has recognized that the corona discharge device may be used to generate ions and accelerate fluids. Such methods are widely used in electrostatic precipitators and electric wind machines as described in Applied Electrostatic Precipitation published by Chapman & Hall (1997). The corona discharge device may be generated by application of a high voltage to pairs of electrodes, e.g., a corona discharge electrode and an attractor electrode. The electrodes should be configured and arranged to produce a non-uniform electric field generation, the corona electrodes typically having sharp edges or otherwise being small in size.
To start and sustain the corona discharge device, high voltage should be applied between the pair of electrodes, e.g., the corona discharge electrode and a nearby attractor (also termed collector) electrode. At least one electrode, i.e., the corona discharge electrode, should be physically small or include sharp points or edges to provide a suitable electric field gradient in the vicinity of the electrode. There are several known configurations used to apply voltage between the electrodes to efficiently generate the requisite electric field for ion production. U.S. Pat. No. 4,789,801 of Lee and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,152,146 and 6,176,977 of Taylor, et al., describe applying a pulsed voltage waveform across pairs of the electrodes, the waveform having a duty cycle between 10% and 100%. These patents describe that such voltage generation decreases ozone generation by the resultant corona discharge device in comparison to application of a steady-state, D.C. power. Regardless of actual benefit of such voltage generation for reducing ozone production, air flow generation is substantially decreased by using a duty cycle less than 100%, while the resultant pulsating air flow is considered unpleasant.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,200,539 of Sherman, et al. describes use of a high frequency high voltage power supply to generate an alternating voltage with a frequency of about 20 kHz. Such high frequency high voltage generation requires a bulky, relatively expensive power supply typically incurring high energy losses. U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,135 of Weinberg describes a high voltage power supply that generates very narrow (i.e., steep, short duration) voltage pulses. Such voltage generation can generate only relatively low volume and rate air flow and is not suitable for the acceleration or movement of high air flows.
All of the above technical solutions focus on specific voltage waveform generation. Accordingly, a need exists for a system for and method of optimizing ion induced fluid acceleration taking into consideration all components and acceleration steps.
The prior art fails to recognize or appreciate the fact that the ion generation process is more complicated than merely applying a voltage to two electrodes. Instead, the systems and methods of the prior art are generally incapable of producing substantial airflow and, at the same time, limiting ozone production.
Corona related processes have three common aspects. A first aspect is the generation of ions in a fluid media. A second aspect is the charging of fluid molecules and foreign particles by the emitted ions. A third aspect is the acceleration of the charged particles toward an opposite (collector) electrode (i.e., along the electric field lines).
Air or other fluid acceleration that is caused by ions, depends both on quantity (i.e., number) of ions and their ability to induce a charge on nearby fluid particles and therefore propel the fluid particles toward an opposing electrode. At the same time, ozone generation is substantially proportional to the power applied to the electrodes. When ions are introduced into the fluid they tend to attach themselves to the particles and to neutrally-charged fluid molecules. Each particle may accept only a limited amount of charge depending on the size of a particular particle. According to the following formula, the maximum amount of charge (so called saturation charge) may be expressed as:
Qp={(1+2λ/dp)2+[1/(1+2λ/dp)]*[(∈r−1)/(∈r+2)]*π∈0dp2E,
where dp=particle size, ∈r is the dielectric constant of the dielectric material between electrode pairs and ∈0 is the dielectric constant in vacuum.
From this equation, it follows that a certain number of ions introduced into the fluid will charge the nearby molecules and ambient particles to some maximum level. This number of ions represents a number of charges flowing from one electrode to another and determines the corona current flowing between the two electrodes.
Once charged, the fluid molecules are attracted to the opposite collector electrode in the direction of the electric field. This directed space over which a force F is exerted, moves molecules having a charge Q which is dependent on the electric field strength E, that is, in turn proportional to the voltage applied to the electrodes:
F=−Q*E.
If a maximum number of ions are introduced into the fluid by the corona current and the resulting charges are accelerated by the applied voltage alone, a substantial airflow is generated while average power consumption is substantially decreased. This may be implemented by controlling how the corona current changes in value from some minimum value to some maximum value while the voltage between the electrodes is substantially constant. In other words, it has been found to be beneficial to minimize a high voltage ripple (or alternating component) of the power voltage applied to the electrodes (as a proportion of the average high voltage applied) while keeping the current ripples substantially high and ideally comparable to the total mean or RMS amplitude of the current. (Unless otherwise noted or implied by usage, as used herein, the term “ripples” and phrase “alternating component” refer to a time varying component of a signal including all time varying signals waveforms such as sinusoidal, square, sawtooth, irregular, compound, etc., and further including both bi-directional waveforms otherwise known as “alternating current” or “a.c.” and unidirectional waveforms such as pulsed direct current or “pulsed d.c.”. Further, unless otherwise indicated by context, adjectives such as “small”, “large”, etc. used in conjunction with such terms including, but not limited to, “ripple”, “a.c. component,”, “alternating component” etc., describe the relative or absolute amplitude of a particular parameter such as signal potential (or “voltage”) and signal rate-of-flow (or “current”). Such distinction between the voltage and current waveforms is possible in the corona related technologies and devices because of the reactive (capacitive) component of the corona generation array of corona and attractor electrodes. The capacitive component results in a relatively low amplitude voltage alternating component producing a relatively large corresponding current alternating component. For example, it is possible in corona discharge devices to use a power supply that generates high voltage with small ripples. These ripples should be of comparatively high frequency “f” (i.e., greater than 1 kHz). The electrodes (i.e., corona electrode and collector electrode) are designed such that their mutual capacitance C is sufficiently high to present a comparatively small impedance Xc when high frequency voltage is applied, as follows:
The electrodes represent or may be viewed as a parallel connection of the non-reactive d.c. resistance and reactive a.c. capacitive impedance. Ohmic resistance causes the corona current to flow from one electrode to another. This current amplitude is approximately proportional to the applied voltage amplitude and is substantially constant (d.c.). The capacitive impedance is responsible for the a.c. portion of the current between the electrodes. This portion is proportional to the amplitude of the a.c. component of the applied voltage (the “ripples”) and inversely proportional to frequency of the voltage alternating component. Depending on the amplitude of the ripple voltage and its frequency, the amplitude of the a.c. component of the current between the electrodes may be less or greater than the d.c. component of the current.
It has been found that a power supply that is able to generate high voltage with small amplitude ripples (i.e., a filtered d.c. voltage) but provides a current with a relatively large a.c. component (i.e., large amplitude current ripples) across the electrodes provides enhanced ions generation and fluid acceleration while, in case of air, substantially reducing or minimizing ozone production. Thus, the current ripples, expressed as a ratio or fraction defined as the amplitude of an a.c. component of the corona current divided by the amplitude of a d.c. component of the corona current (i.e., Ia.c./Id.c.) should be considerably greater (i.e., at least 2 times) than, and preferably at least 10, 100 and, even more preferably, 1000 times as large as the voltage ripples, the latter similarly defined as the amplitude of the time-varying or a.c. component of the voltage applied to the corona discharge electrode divided by the amplitude of the d.c. component (i.e., Va.c./Vd.c.).
It has been additionally found that optimal corona discharge device performance is achieved when the output voltage has small amplitude voltage alternating component relative to the average voltage amplitude and the current through the electrodes and intervening dielectric (i.e., fluid to be accelerated) is at least 2, and more preferably 10 times, larger (relative to a d.c. current component) than the voltage alternating component (relative to d.c. voltage) i.e., the a.c./d.c. ratio of the current is much greater by a factor of 2, 10 or even more than a.c./d.c. ratio of the applied voltage. That is, where the electrical power applied to a corona discharge device, such as an electrostatic fluid accelerator, is composed of a constant voltage/current component (e.g., a non-varying-in-time direct current or d.c. component) and a time-varying component (e.g., a pulsed or alternating current (a.c.) component) expressed as whereby Vt=Vd.c.+Va.c. and It=Id.c.+Ia.c., it is preferable to generate a voltage across the corona discharge electrodes such that a resultant current satisfies the following relationships:
Va.c.<<Vd.c. and Ia.c.˜Id.c.
or Va.c./Vd.c.<<Ia.c./Id.c.
or Va.c.<Vd.c. and Ia.c.>Id.c.
or VRMS≅VMEAN and IRMS>IMEAN
If any of the above requirements are satisfied, then the resultant corona discharge device consumes less power per cubic foot of fluid moved and produces less ozone (in the case of air) compared to a power supply wherein the a.c./d.c. ratios of current and voltage are approximately equal.
To satisfy these requirements, the power supply and the corona generating device should be appropriately designed and configured. In particular, the power supply should generate a high voltage output with only minimal and, at the same time, relatively high frequency ripples. The corona generating device itself should have a predetermined value of designed, stray or parasitic capacitance that provides a substantial high frequency current flow through the electrodes, i.e., from one electrode to another. Should the power supply generate low frequency ripples, then Xc will be relatively large and the amplitude of the alternating component current will not be comparable to the amplitude of the direct current component of the current. Should the power supply generate very small or no ripple, then alternating current will not be comparable to the direct current. Should the corona generating device (i.e., the electrode array) have a low capacitance (including parasitic and/or stray capacitance between the electrodes), then the alternating current again will not be comparable in amplitude to the direct current. If a large resistance is installed between the power supply and the electrode array (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,789,801 of Lee, FIGS. 1 and 2), then the amplitude of the a.c. current ripples will be dampened (i.e., decreased) and will not be comparable in amplitude to that of the d.c. (i.e., constant) component of the current. Thus, only if certain conditions are satisfied, such that predetermined voltage and current relationships exist, will the corona generating device optimally function to provide sufficient air flow, enhanced operating efficiency, and desirable ozone levels. The resultant power supply is also less costly.
In particular, a power supply that generates ripples does not require substantial output filtering otherwise provided by a relatively expensive and physically large high voltage capacitor connected at the power supply output. This alone makes the power supply less expensive. In addition, such a power supply has less “inertia” i.e., less stored energy tending to dampen amplitude variations in the output and is therefore capable of rapidly changing output voltage than is a high inertia power supply with no or negligible ripples.
Resistor 108 represents the non-reactive d.c. ohmic load resistance R characteristic of the air gap between the corona discharge and attractor electrodes. This resistance R depends on the voltage applied, typically having a typical value of 10 mega-Ohms.
The d.c. component from the HVPS 105 flows through resistor 108 while the a.c. component primarily flows through the capacitance 107 representing a substantially lower impedance at the 100 kHz operating range than does resistor 108. In particular, the impedance Xc of capacitor 107 is a function of the ripple frequency. In this case it is approximately equal to:
Xc=1/(2πf C)=1/(2*3.14*100,000*10*10−12)=160 kΩ
The a.c. component Ia.c. of the current flowing through capacitance 107 is equal to
Ia.c.=Va.c./Xc=640/160,000=0.004 A=4 mA.
The d.c. component Idc of the current flowing through the resistor 108 is equal to
Idc=Vdc/R=18 kV/10 MΩ=1.8 mA.
Therefore the a.c. component Iac of the resulting current between the electrodes is about 2.2 times greater than the d.c. component Idc of the resulting current.
The operation of device 100 may be described with reference to the timing diagram of FIG. 1B. When the ionization current reaches some maximum amplitude (Imax), ions are emitted from the corona discharge electrode so as to charge ambient molecules and particles of the fluid (i.e., air molecules). At this time maximum power is generated and maximum ozone production (in air or oxygen) occurs. When the current decreases to Imin, less power is generated and virtually no ozone is produced.
At the same time, charged molecules and particles are accelerated toward the opposite electrode (the attractor electrode) with the same force (since the voltage remains essentially constant) as in the maximum current condition. Thus, the fluid acceleration rate is not substantially affected and not to the same degree as the ozone production is reduced.
Acceleration of the ambient fluid results from the moment of ions forming the corona discharge electrodes to the attractor electrode. This is because under the influence of voltage 101, ions are emitted from the corona discharge electrode and create an “ion cloud” surrounding the corona discharge electrode. This ion cloud moves toward the opposite attractor electrode in response to the electric field strength, the intensity of which is proportional to the value of the applied voltage 101. The power supplied by power supply 105 is approximately proportional to the output current 102 (assuming voltage 101 is maintained substantially constant). Thus, the pulsated nature of current 102 results in less energy consumption than a pure d.c. current of the same amplitude. Such current waveform and relationship between a.c. and d.c. components of the current is ensured by having a low internal resistance 106 and small amplitude alternating component 103 of the output voltage. It has been experimentally determined that most efficient electrostatic fluid acceleration is achieved when relative amplitude of the current 102 alternating component (i.e., Iac/Idc) is greater than the relative amplitude of voltage 101 alternating component (i.e., Vac/Vdc). Further, as these ratios diverge, additional improvement is realized. Thus, if Vac/Vdc is considerably less than (i.e., no more than half) and, preferably, no more than 1/10, 1/100, or, even more preferably, 1/1000 that of Iac/Idc, (wherein Vac and Iac are similarly measured, e.g., both are RMS, peak-to-peak, or similar values) additional efficiency of fluid acceleration is achieved. Mathematically stated a different way, the product of the constant component of the corona current and the time-varying component of the applied voltage divided by the product of the time-varying component of the corona current and the constant component of the applied voltage should be minimized, each discrete step in magnitude for some initial steps providing significant improvements:
Measurements of system performance verify improved efficiency and enhanced removal and elimination of particulates present in air processed by the system. In particular, it has been found that systems employing various embodiments of the invention exhibit a dust collection efficiency exceeding 99.97% for the removal of dust particles of 0.1 μm and larger. Thus, the system ensures that most particles achieve some maximum charge, i.e., no further charges (e.g., ion) may be associated with each particle. This leads to the conclusion that the corona technology according to embodiments of the invention is functional to fully charge all particles of interest such that any increase in current would not further enhance system performance, particularly when the system is primarily used for air cleaning versus general fluid acceleration and control.
It has further been determined that the various embodiments of the invention operate efficiently regardless of relationship of the applied high voltage to the ground. For example, in one case the corona electrodes may be connected to, for example, positive high voltage potential while the corresponding collector electrodes are connected to the ground. In another embodiment the corona electrodes may be connected to ground while the collecting electrodes are connected to a high negative potential without affecting efficiency of the resultant device. Thus, for example, the embodiment depicted in
It has been found that preferred embodiments of the invention exhibit enhanced efficiency when high voltage and current ripples are in at least the ultrasonic frequency, i.e. when the frequency of alternating (i.e., a.c.) components of the corona voltage (Va.c.) and current (Ia.c.) are well in excess of 20 kHz. The advantages include at least two factors. A first factor takes into consideration acoustic noise generated by devices operating at audible or near-audible frequencies. That is, even ultrasonic frequencies can disturb and distress pets which are often capable of hearing such high frequency (i.e., super-sonic to humans) sounds. A second factor considers operating frequency in comparison to the distance traveled by particles passing through an electrostatic air cleaning device according to embodiments of the invention. That is, based on a relatively high fluid (e.g., air) velocity, fluid (e.g. air) molecules and particles present therein may pass most or all important portions of collection elements (e.g., the front parts or leading edges of the collecting electrodes) without being fully charged if the ripples frequency is low. Accordingly, this again dictates use of some minimum frequency for voltage or current varying (e.g., alternating or pulsed) components of the device operating voltage and current. In particular, it has been determined that such varying (e.g., a.c.) components should have a frequency that is at least ultrasonic, and, in particular above, 20-25 kHz and, more preferably, having a frequency in the 50+ kHz range. The frequency characteristic may also be defined such that a combination of the main frequency and an amplitude level thereof minimizes the generation of undesirable sounds to an imperceivable or imperceptible level, e.g., is inaudible to humans and/or animals, i.e., requires that the alternating component of the voltage Va.c. have a main frequency well in excess of an audible sound level.
In summary, the present invention includes embodiments in which a low inertia power supply is combined with an array of corona discharge elements presenting a highly reactive load to the power supply. That is, the capacitive loading of the array greatly exceeds any reactive component in the output of the power supply. This relationship provides a constant, low ripple voltage and a high ripple current. The result is on a highly efficient electrostatic fluid accelerator with reduced ozone production.
It should be noted and understood that all publications, patents and patent applications mentioned in this specification are indicative of the level of skill in the art to which the invention pertains. All publications, patents and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The instant application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/175,947 filed Jun. 21, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,664,741 issued Dec. 16, 2003 and is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/419,720 filed Oct. 14, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,504,308 issued Jan. 7, 2003 and incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1888606 | Nesbit | Nov 1932 | A |
2590447 | Nord, Jr. et al. | Mar 1952 | A |
2765975 | Lindenblad | Oct 1956 | A |
2949550 | Brown | Aug 1960 | A |
3026964 | Penney | Mar 1962 | A |
3071705 | Coleman et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3108394 | Ellman et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3198726 | Trikilis | Aug 1965 | A |
3267860 | Brown | Aug 1966 | A |
3374941 | Okress | Mar 1968 | A |
3518462 | Brown | Jun 1970 | A |
3582694 | Gourdine | Jun 1971 | A |
3638058 | Fritzius | Jan 1972 | A |
3675096 | Kiess | Jul 1972 | A |
3699387 | Edwards | Oct 1972 | A |
3740927 | Vincent | Jun 1973 | A |
3751715 | Edwards | Aug 1973 | A |
3892927 | Lindenberg | Jul 1975 | A |
3896347 | Gelfand | Jul 1975 | A |
3907520 | Huang et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3918939 | Hardt | Nov 1975 | A |
3936635 | Clark | Feb 1976 | A |
3981695 | Fuchs | Sep 1976 | A |
3983393 | Thettu et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3984215 | Zucker | Oct 1976 | A |
4008057 | Gelfand et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4011719 | Banks | Mar 1977 | A |
4061961 | Baker | Dec 1977 | A |
4086152 | Rich et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4086650 | Davis et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4124003 | Abe et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4126434 | Keiichi | Nov 1978 | A |
4156885 | Baker et al. | May 1979 | A |
4162144 | Cheney | Jul 1979 | A |
4210847 | Shannon et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4216000 | Kofoid | Aug 1980 | A |
4231766 | Spurgin | Nov 1980 | A |
4232355 | Finger et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4240809 | Elsbernd et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
RE30480 | Gelfand | Jan 1981 | E |
4246010 | Honacker | Jan 1981 | A |
4259707 | Penney | Mar 1981 | A |
4266948 | Teague et al. | May 1981 | A |
4267502 | Reese et al. | May 1981 | A |
4292493 | Selander et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4313741 | Masuda et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4315837 | Rourke et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4335414 | Weber | Jun 1982 | A |
4351648 | Penney | Sep 1982 | A |
4369776 | Roberts | Jan 1983 | A |
4376637 | Yang | Mar 1983 | A |
4379129 | Abe | Apr 1983 | A |
4380720 | Fleck | Apr 1983 | A |
4388274 | Rourke et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4390831 | Byrd et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4401385 | Katayama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4477268 | Kalt | Oct 1984 | A |
4481017 | Furlong | Nov 1984 | A |
4496375 | Le Vantine | Jan 1985 | A |
4567541 | Terai | Jan 1986 | A |
4600411 | Santamaria | Jul 1986 | A |
4604112 | Ciliberti et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4632135 | Lenting et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4643745 | Sakakibara et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646196 | Reale | Feb 1987 | A |
4649703 | Dettling et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4673416 | Sakakibara et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4689056 | Noguchi et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4713724 | Voelkel | Dec 1987 | A |
4719535 | Zhenjun et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4740862 | Halleck | Apr 1988 | A |
4741746 | Chao et al. | May 1988 | A |
4775915 | Walgrove, III | Oct 1988 | A |
4783595 | Seidl | Nov 1988 | A |
4789801 | Lee | Dec 1988 | A |
4790861 | Watai et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4811159 | Foster, Jr. | Mar 1989 | A |
4812711 | Torok et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4837658 | Reale | Jun 1989 | A |
4838021 | Beattie | Jun 1989 | A |
4853719 | Reale | Aug 1989 | A |
4853735 | Kodama et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4878149 | Stiehl et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4924937 | Beal et al. | May 1990 | A |
4938786 | Tonomoto | Jul 1990 | A |
4941068 | Hofmann | Jul 1990 | A |
4941353 | Fukatsu et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4980611 | Orenstein | Dec 1990 | A |
4996473 | Markson et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5012159 | Torok et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5024685 | Torok et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5055118 | Nagoshi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059219 | Plaks et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5072746 | Kantor | Dec 1991 | A |
5077500 | Torok et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5087943 | Creveling | Feb 1992 | A |
5136461 | Zellweger | Aug 1992 | A |
5138513 | Weinstein | Aug 1992 | A |
5155531 | Kurotori et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163983 | Lee | Nov 1992 | A |
5199257 | Colletta et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5215558 | Moon | Jun 1993 | A |
5245692 | Kawai | Sep 1993 | A |
5257073 | Gross et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5269131 | Brophy | Dec 1993 | A |
5330559 | Cheney et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5368839 | Aime et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369953 | Brophy | Dec 1994 | A |
5423902 | Strutz et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5469242 | Yu et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474599 | Cheney et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484472 | Weinberg | Jan 1996 | A |
5508880 | Beyer | Apr 1996 | A |
5535089 | Ford et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5556448 | Cheney et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569368 | Larsky et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5578112 | Krause | Nov 1996 | A |
5601636 | Glucksman | Feb 1997 | A |
5642254 | Benwood et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656063 | Hsu | Aug 1997 | A |
5661299 | Purser | Aug 1997 | A |
5667564 | Weinberg | Sep 1997 | A |
5707428 | Feldman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5769155 | Ohadi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779769 | Jiang | Jul 1998 | A |
5814135 | Weinberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5827407 | Wang et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5847917 | Suzuki | Dec 1998 | A |
5854742 | Faulk | Dec 1998 | A |
5892363 | Roman | Apr 1999 | A |
5894001 | Hitzler et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899666 | Chung et al. | May 1999 | A |
D411001 | Pinchuk | Jun 1999 | S |
5920474 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5951957 | Simpson | Sep 1999 | A |
5973905 | Shaw | Oct 1999 | A |
5982102 | Andzej | Nov 1999 | A |
5993521 | Loreth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
D420438 | Pinchuk | Feb 2000 | S |
6023155 | Kalinsky et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042637 | Weinberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6056808 | Krause | May 2000 | A |
D427300 | Pinchuk | Jun 2000 | S |
6084350 | Ezaki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108504 | Dickhoff | Aug 2000 | A |
6125636 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
D433494 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 2000 | S |
D434483 | Pinchuk | Nov 2000 | S |
6145298 | Burton | Nov 2000 | A |
6152146 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163098 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167196 | Huggins et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176977 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182671 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
D438513 | Pinchuk | Mar 2001 | S |
6195827 | Dumitriu | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200539 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203600 | Loreth | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D440290 | Pinchuk | Apr 2001 | S |
6210642 | Lee et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228330 | Herrmann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245126 | Feldman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245132 | Feldman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6312507 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6313064 | Miyafuji et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350417 | Lau et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6394086 | Barnes et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6574123 | Wiser et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6603268 | Lee | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6664741 | Krichtafovitch | Dec 2003 | B1 |
20010004046 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010032544 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010048906 | Lau et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020079212 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020098131 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122751 | Sinaiko et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020122752 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020127156 | Taylor | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141914 | Lau et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020155041 | McKinney Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030033176 | Hancock | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030147785 | Joannou | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165410 | Taylor | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030170150 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030206837 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030206839 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030206840 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030209420 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030234618 | Krichtafovitch | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004440 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040004797 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025497 | Truce | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040033340 | Lau et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047775 | Lau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052700 | Kotlyar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057882 | Lau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079233 | Lau et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040183454 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10175947 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 10735302 | US |