Not applicable.
This invention relates generally to fabrication and handling of nanostructures.
In recent years, there has been much interest in nanostructures, such as carbon nanotubes and related structures, e.g., nanofibers and nanowires, and their potential use in a wide range of applications. Some nanostructure-based products have already appeared in the market place, for example, scanning probe microscopy probes with carbon nanotube probe tips. However, wide-spread commercial use has been hampered by difficulties in integrating individual nanostructures into target micro-scale devices. One challenging aspect of such integration involves nanostructure handling. More specifically, individual nanostructures cannot yet be easily transferred to a target site. Controlling nanostructures in terms of number, shape, size and location has also proven challenging. Of course, to successfully commercialize any nanostructure product use, it is critical that the nanostructure that has been integrated in a target device retain its original properties. Preserving the nanostructure's original properties during product manufacture with existing technologies remains an issue. These problems must be addressed in order to achieve the high yield, fast rate and low cost needed for mass production of nanostructure-based devices.
Prior efforts have tended to focus on two alternative approaches: i) attaching the individual nanostructure directly to the target site; or ii) synthesizing the nanostructure on the target site. These approaches require additional tasks that not only are labor-intensive and time-consuming but subject the nanostructures to further manipulation as well. Typically, when nanostructures are grown on target sites, there is a need to remove redundant nanostructures and/or trim nanostructures to achieve a desired nanostructure length. Nanostructures that are fabricated elsewhere are usually welded (or bonded) to the target site. Consequently, product manufacturing based on existing approaches such as these is inadequate for large-scale production purposes.
In one aspect, a method of fabricating nanostructures includes forming an array of encapsulated nanostructures on a substrate. The encapsulated nanostructures include nanostructures and multi-block structures to encapsulate the nanostructures.
Embodiments may include one or more of the following features. The array of encapsulated nanostructures can be formed by: disposing catalytic material at sites on the substrate; growing the nanostructures on the sites of the catalytic material; providing layers of polymers, including at least a bottom layer and a top layer, over the nanostructures; and processing the layers of polymers to form the multi-block structures. The bottom layer and the top layer can have etching selectivity to each other. The nanostructures can be carbon nanotubes or other types of nanostructures.
In another aspect, a method of fabricating a scanning probe microscopy probe includes fabricating an encapsulated nanostructure that includes a nanostructure and a multi-block structure to encapsulate the nanostructure, attaching the encapsulated nanostructure to a probe tip end of a cantilever, and removing a portion of the multi-block structure to expose a portion of the nanostructure. The exposed portion of the nanostructure provides a probe tip at the probe tip end of the cantilever.
In yet another aspect, a device includes a nanostructure and a multi-block structure that encapsulates the nanostructure. The nanostructure is a nanostructure that was grown on a substrate and the multi-block structure is a multi-block structure that was formed by providing layers of polymers over the nanostructure and processing the layers to produce the multi-block structure.
This nanostructure encapsulation scheme, which can be achieved with simple polymer coating and pattern processes, provides a robust mechanism for nanostructure control and handling. It controls nanostructure orientation and desired length (for a given application) in a deterministic and repeatable way. In addition, the encapsulation of the nanostructure with a multi-block structure makes nanostructure handling much easier. Individual nanostructures need not be manipulated during transfer to a target site. In addition to providing a protective carrier for the nanostructure, the multi-block structure also allows precise attachment of the nanostructure to the target site. Moreover, a portion of the multi-block structure remains at the target site to support and hold the nanostructure firmly during use. Each encapsulated nanostructure can be made usable by a target device by removing, e.g., by etching, one of the layers to expose a portion of the nanostructure. Because the nanostructure is not directly attached to the target site, as it is with some conventional techniques, there is greater control over the orientation of the nanostructure when it is integrated or installed in a target device. Thus, overall, the polymer layering and patterning techniques, which produce a micro-scale “packaging” for the nanostructure, ensure greater control over the manipulation of nanostructures while providing geometrical uniformity. This approach to nanostructure and nanostructure-based device production offers an effective solution to the problems of mass-producing nanostructure-based devices.
The foregoing features of the structures, methods and concepts described above and elsewhere herein may be more fully understood from the following description of the drawings in which:
Referring to
Presented herein are exemplary techniques for producing the device 18. Some processing occurs prior to transfer of a nanostructure to a particular target site. This “pre-transfer processing” produces individually encapsulated nanostructures. In one embodiment, as will be described, the pre-processing simultaneously produces an array of individually encapsulated nanostructures for use at numerous target sites. Further processing, or “post-transfer processing,” may occur at a target site to produce a device like device 18, that is, one in which embedded portion of the nanostructure is firmly held in a micro-scale block while the other portion of the nanostructure is exposed for use by an application (i.e., the type of target device in which it is utilized). The exposed portion, shown in the illustrative device 18 of
Referring to
Still referring to
Further details of the encapsulated nanostructure production process 20 (from
Referring first to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The patterning of the polymer materials is illustrated in
Still referring to
Referring now to
Further details of the process 130 (from
Turning first to
Referring to
Referring now to
As shown in a fourth assembly 190 of
As discussed above, movement is required to position the cantilever's probe tip end 154 relative to the encapsulated nanostructure 96 with attached substrate 40 as well as to separate the encapsulated nanostructure 96 from the substrate 40. Commercially available scanners, motion stages and other motion devices can be used to effect the necessary movement along various axes of motion.
Referring now to
Multiple encapsulated nanostructures can be mounted at the same time for parallel assembly, for example, parallel probe assembly or single SPM, multi-probe assembly. In the case of the probe application, if the cantilever or tip end is wide or there is multiple cantilever tip end, multiple encapsulated nanostructures can be mounted at the same time. More generally, parallel assembly is feasible by implementing assembly schemes already available in industry. One example is the slider bonding process used for head gimbal assembly in hard disk drive manufacturing.
Nanostructure dimensions, including diameter and length, can be changed to suit the needs of the application. For example, and referring back to step 26 in
The support provided by the remaining micro-scale block (i.e., the block 92 formed from the top layer 78) to the nanostructure 64 is predetermined through the selection of top layer thicknesses 79, and patterning of the top layer 78, which defines the shape of the top block 92 (by determining how much material remains to surround the nanostructure 64). It will be appreciated that that these selections are a matter of design choice, taking into account the intended function of the nanostructure in its target application.
Typically, the end (or top) of a nanotube is flat, but may be shaped for tilt compensation angles using known techniques. In addition, the end may be coated or otherwise adapted for certain purposes.
Referring now to
The above-described approach to producing devices that have a nanostructure such as a CNT as a component offers significant advantages over conventional technologies. The fabrication of the nanostructure, including its encapsulation, is performed prior to device assembly. Thus, the nanostructure growth is decoupled from the device assembly. In addition, the encapsulation of individual nanostructures in micro-scale polymer blocks serves to bridge the gap between the nano-scale domain of the nanostructures and the micro-scale domain of the target devices. The scale mismatches between nano- and micro-fabrication processes, which in the past have limited the practical production of nanostructure-based devices, are therefore eliminated. The length of usable “exposed” nanostructure available at the target site, can be set to meet requirements of a target device through the choice of bottom layer thickness as well as the etch rates of the materials selected for the polymer layers. The orientation of the nanostructures, including the vertical alignment on the substrate, as well as the position of the nanostructure at the target site is also helped by the encapsulation. The layers surround the nanostructures on the substrate and the post-patterning multi-block structure supports the nanostructure during transfer and attachment. The top block/top layer securely holds the nanostructure during device use, thus providing increased stability and durability. The encapsulated nanostructure can be more easily and firmly attached to the target site, as the encapsulated nanostructure is easier to manipulate than an unencapsulated one. Therefore, the encapsulation can transform CNTs and other nanostructures into more manageable and manufacturable form with which existing micro-scale manufacturing technologies can be utilized.
The processes described above are compatible and can be integrated with many existing commercial manufacturing processes, making the encapsulated nanostructures easy to incorporate into existing devices and future device designs. For example, the processes can be integrated into standard scanning probe (e.g., silicon probe) manufacturing processes. The encapsulated nanostructures can be made available to probe manufacturers on a small piece of the substrate, allowing such users to easily produce probes with nanostructure probe tips following an assembly process such as that described above with reference to
Although the encapsulated nanostructure concept has been discussed within the context of a scanning probe microscopy application, it will be appreciated that it can be applied to other types of devices and applications. Other applications can include nano electric devices having a nanotube or nanowire bridge, for example, electron beam guns, single-electron transistors, field emission devices, nanolithography systems among many other electronic applications, as well as electro-mechanical, structural material and biological applications.
All references cited herein are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Having described preferred embodiments which serve to illustrate various concepts, structures and techniques which are the subject of this patent, it will now become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating these concepts, structures and techniques may be used. Accordingly, it is submitted that that scope of the patent should not be limited to the described embodiments but rather should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/117,388, filed Nov. 24, 2008, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5264722 | Tonucci et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5292689 | Cronin et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5380546 | Krishnan et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5899734 | Lee | May 1999 | A |
6146227 | Mancevski | Nov 2000 | A |
6452171 | Moloni | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457350 | Mitchell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464853 | Iwasaki et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504292 | Choi et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6545396 | Ohki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566704 | Choi et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6628053 | Den et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6716409 | Hafner et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719602 | Nakayama et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737939 | Hoppe et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740910 | Roesner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6831017 | Li et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6838297 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6864481 | Kaito et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866801 | Mau et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871528 | Schlaf et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882051 | Majumdar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7032437 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038299 | Furukawa | May 2006 | B2 |
7048903 | Colbert et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7077939 | Crooks | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7081383 | Gutsche | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091120 | Buretea et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118941 | Zhang | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7151256 | Guillorn et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7170055 | Deng et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181958 | Schlaf | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7211795 | Collier et | May 2007 | B2 |
7258901 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7491631 | Furukawa | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507987 | Kim et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514214 | Wade | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7897030 | Suh | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947548 | Altebaeumer | May 2011 | B2 |
20020163079 | Awano | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020172820 | Majumdar | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030020060 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030052585 | Guillorn et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030096104 | Tobita et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030178617 | Appenzeller et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179559 | Engelhardt et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030211724 | Haase | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040055892 | Oh | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040071951 | Jin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040137730 | Kim | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050208304 | Collier | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070066080 | Kugler | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070092431 | Resasco | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070108068 | Suh | May 2007 | A1 |
20070170071 | Suh | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080014573 | Nagamura | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029851 | Kirby | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080032238 | Lu | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080194073 | Park | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090242912 | Altebaeumer | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100085684 | Suh | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100300893 | Suh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301299 | Suh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100301734 | Suh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304215 | Suh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 022 763 | Jul 2000 | EP |
WO 0211216 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 02059392 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02100931 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2004033370 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kim (“Transplanting Assembly of Carbon Nanotubes;” CIRP Annals; vol. 55; No. 1 Jan. 1, 2006; pp. 15-18). |
Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the ISA for PCT/US2009/063676 dated Jun. 3, 2011. |
Cheung, et al.; “Carbon Nanotube Atomic Force Microscopy Tips: Direct Growth by Chemical Vapor Deposition and Application to High-Resolution Imaging;” PNAS; vol. 97; No. 8; Apr. 11, 2000; pp. 3809-3813. |
El-Aguizy, et al.; “Transplanting Carbon Nanotubes;” American Institute of Physics; Applied Physics Letter; vol. 85; No. 24; Dec. 13, 2004; pp. 5995-5997. |
Kim; “Transplanting Assembly of Carbon Nanotubes;” CIRP Annals; vol. 55; No. 1; Jan. 1, 2006; pp. 15-18. |
Kim, et al.; “Deterministic Transplanting Assembly of Individual Carbon Nanotubes to Mems Cantilevers for Bioscanning;” Twelfth International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Science; Oct. 16, 2008; pp. 880-882. |
PCT Search Report of the ISA for PCT/US 2009/063676 dated Dec. 27, 2010. |
Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2009/063676 dated Dec. 27, 2010. |
Choi et al., “Fully sealed high-brightness carbon-nanotube field-emission display”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75 No. 7 (Nov. 15, 1999) 3129-3131, 3 pages. |
Gröning et al., “Properties and characterization of chemical vapor deposition, diamond field emitters”, Solid State Electronics, 45 (2001), 929-944, 16 pages. |
Li et al., “Bottom-up approach for carbon nanotube interconnects”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82 No. 15 (Apr. 14, 2003), 2491-2493, 3 pages. |
Lee et al., “Fabrication of flexible field emitter arrays of carbon nanotubes using self-assembly monolayers”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82 No. 21 (May 26, 2003), 3770-3772, 3 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US03/32109 dated Mar. 1, 2004, 5 pages. |
Database Online “Method for Manufacture of Switching Devices by Selective Growth of Carbon Nanotubes”, XP-002270461, Abstract dated Jan. 14, 1999, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100132080 A1 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61117388 | Nov 2008 | US |