Patent Application
20110159505
This application claims the benefit of the Japanese patent application: JP2008-159527 filed in the Japanese Patent Office, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The subject invention pertains to a unique method of manufacturing a mixture of amplified double-stranded nucleic acids comprising unknown sequence.
2. Discussion of the Background
The precise determination of the sequence around each 5′ end of nucleic acids is of a special interest in biology. In the case of ribonucleic acid (RNA), this sequence reveals a corresponding location in the chromosomes, the gene promoter, which is a crucial component of the gene regulation mechanism. Therefore, many efforts have been made to isolate 5′ ends of RNA molecules. However, it is difficult to be certain that the observed 5′ end corresponds to a molecule really existing in vivo and is not the product of the truncation of a longer RNA molecule during the experiment.
Several approaches have taken advantage of the fact that the 5′ ends of the complex fraction of the total RNA content of living cells—comprising the messenger RNAs (mRNAs)—can be distinguished by the presence of a specific modification, called the cap, which consists of a guanosine 5′ triphosphate modified by one or more methylations. In experimental conditions, RNA molecules bearing the cap can be considered intact in their 5′ end, and methods aimed to capture the 5′ ends ensure that only these molecules participate to the final product. For instance, in the Cap-Trapper method, the diol group of the cap is used to bind 5′-intact RNA molecules on beads and to exclude complementary deoxyribonucleic acids (cDNAs) of truncated RNA molecules [Carninci 2001, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.]. In the oligo-capping method, a 5′ oligonucleotide is attached to the RNA molecules in three reactions using phosphatase, pyrophosphatase and ligase [Maruyama 1994, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.]. In the CAPswitch method, the propensity of the reverse transcriptase (RTase) to add extra cytidine nucleotides to the first-strand cDNAs templated from capped molecules is exploited to distinguish them from the uncapped RNAs [Chenchik 1999, U.S. Pat. No. 5,962,272, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.].
Chenchick et al invented the CAPswitch method, “for the synthesis and cloning of full-length cDNA, or cDNA fragments, that correspond to the complete sequence of 5′-ends of mRNA molecules”. Pivotal in this method is the use of a template switching (TS) oligonucleotide that serves as a new template to extend the first-strand cDNAs after they reach the cap of their mRNA template. The mechanism of CAPswitch was not clearly understood at the when this method was patented. The optimal sequence at the 3′ end of the TS oligonucleotide was determined by Chenchick et al by using TS oligonucleotide finishing with random nucleotides and analyzing the sequence of the resulting full-length cDNAs. It was then refined by a mutagenesis analysis. They hypothesized that the TS oligonucleotide would hybridize to the cap structure of the mRNA (see the CAPswitch patent's abstract and figures), or to extra 3′ cytidine residues on the first-strand cDNA added by a terminal transferase activity of the RTase. The role of the CAP was unclear, as it was stated that it was not a necessary requirement for strand template-switching, but was making the reaction more effective for full-length
In fact, It has been demonstrated that the mechanism for first-strand cDNA extension depends on the molecular nature of the cap, because it is used by the RTase as a template for a short extension of the full-length cDNA: cytosines are added for 7-methylguanosine caps [Hirzmann 1993, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.], but in the case of adenosine caps (very frequent intermediate steps in enzymatic reactions), the extra nucleotides added are thymidines [Ohtake 2004, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.]. A residual terminal transferase activity is detected for cap-less RNA molecules and as a 5% background for capped molecules. This explains why only cDNAs that reached the 5′ end of a RNA molecule can switch template.
The patent of Chenchick et al is written broadly and covers usage of total RNA or polyA-tailed RNA, the use of oligodT or random RT primers, the specific amplification of one gene or the amplification of a whole library.
However, eight years after it was issued, there is no academic or commercial evidence that the patented method can be used to amplify a library of complete 5′ ends of capped RNA (with and without polyA tails) using random RT primers on total RNA at nanogram scale. In the example number 1 of the patent, a library is made using random primers, but together with polyadenylated RNA. In example 2, a library is made from 100 nanograms of total RNA, but using oligodT RT primers. In example number 3 polyadenylated RNA is reverse-transcribed with a double stranded oligodT primer. In example number 4, total RNA is reverse-transcribed by oligodT primers, and the subsequent steps include a enzymatic cleavage in which the 5′ completeness is lost. The patent does contain an example of usage of CAPswitch with total RNA and random RT primers. However, it is in the context of the “5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends” method, which is gene-specific: the products of the RT are not amplified as a library.
Consequently, simultaneous practical usage of random RT primers and total RNA for preparing a library of complete 5′ ends is absent in the patent or in the later literature, and thus the RT products having the complete 5′ ends are not amplified as a library.
Suppressive PCR is known as a method used for the preparation of libraries of target nucleic acids in a complex nucleic acid mixture and used to selectively control the size of PCR products which can be amplified in a reaction.
Suppressive PCR was invented by Chenchik et al, who were issued the U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,340 in 1996 ([Chenchik 1996, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.]). In this method, some DNA molecules are prevented from being amplified during a PCR by adding complementary adapters to their 5′ and 3′ ends. The complementarity between the adapters exceeds the complementarity between adapters and PCR primers. During the annealing step of the reaction, intramolecular folding will be favored compared to hybridization with PCR primers, and the folded templates will not be extended. Due to the exponential nature of the PCR, when a significant number of molecules skip amplification at every cycle, their contribution to the final product becomes neglectable.
The strategies of suppressive PCR can be classified in two categories. In the first, the PCR is made with a pair of different forward and reverse primers, and each adapter have complementarity to one of them. Therefore, the templates flanked by the same adapter will be suppressed, whereas templates that match both PCR primers will be amplified.
In the second category, the PCR is made with a single primer. In this case, the molecules that will be amplified are the ones for which the intramolecular folding is the less probable: the longer molecules. This approach is usually employed to suppress primer dimers and counterbalance the tendency of the PCR to favour the shortest amplicons [Brownie 1997, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.].
To summarize, there are two possible strategies of suppressive PCR with distinct advantages: the first strategy described above results in a sequence-based selection while the latter strategy gives rise to a size-based selection, trying to overcome the bias towards short-sized templates that commonly affects PCR.
However, it is unfortunately difficult to get all the benefits of the suppressive PCR method at the same time: to normalize the size of the amplicons and eliminate primer dimers, the templates should have the suppressive sequences in 5′ and 3′, but when the method is used to eliminate other artifacts, the desired templates should be amplified with distinct forward and reverse PCR primers.
The reason why it was very difficult to combine total RNA, CAPswitch and random priming for the preparation of libraries of complete 5′ ends from nanograms of template is the artifacts created during the RT. Since only low quantities of template are used, the second-strand cDNA synthesis should be coupled with an amplification step, typically PCR, in which the artifacts will outcompete the 5′-complete cDNAs. Artifacts can be created in the following situations:
At first the inventors thought to use suppressive PCR to avoid the amplification of the primers dimers, by giving them a sequence tail designed according to Chenchick et al's method and using single universal PCR primer.
However, this design does not allow suppressing the artifacts created by premature template-switching after strand invasion, or by priming the RNA with the TS oligonucleotide. Each artifact introduces noise in the information: when the RT primer triggers template switching of the RTase, some internal sequences can be mistaken for transcription starting sites, and when the TS oligonucleotide primes the RNA, the resulting cDNA loses directionality and can be mistaken for an antisense transcript.
Therefore, the purpose of the subject invention is to provide a method of manufacturing a mixture of amplified double-stranded nucleic acids comprising unknown sequence including the complete 5′ end sequence.
The inventors found that using a different sequence for the TS oligonucleotide and the RT primer tails would tackle the problem of the long artifacts, but in practice the primer dimers originating from the interaction between the TS oligonucleotide and the RT primer take over the PCR.
Consequently, the inventors succeeded in inventing the following method to tackle all issues at the same time based on the above finding.
The subject invention relates to a method of manufacturing a mixture of amplified double-stranded nucleic acids.
The method of the subject invention comprises (a) preparing a single-stranded nucleic acid comprising a single-stranded adapter 1, a single-stranded nucleic acid fragment and a single-stranded adapter 2, and (b) conducting PCR with the single-stranded nucleic acid prepared in step (a). Example of the single-stranded nucleic acid is one comprising the single-stranded adapter 1, the single-stranded nucleic acid fragment and the single-stranded adapter 2 in 5′ to 3′ direction.
In step (a), the single-stranded adapter 1 comprises a common sequence 1 and a suffix sequence 1, the single-stranded adapter 2 comprises a common sequence 2 and a suffix sequence 2. The common sequence 1 and the common sequence 2 are reverse-complementary. The suffix sequence 1 and the suffix sequence 2 are not reverse-complementary. Example of the single-stranded adapter 1 is one comprising the common sequence 1 and the suffix sequence 1 in 5′ to 3′ direction, example of the single-stranded adapter 2 is one comprising the suffix sequence 2 and the common sequence 2 in 5′ to 3′ direction,
In step (b), a primer 1 comprising a part of the common sequence 1 and the suffix sequence 1, and a primer 2 reverse-complementary to a part of the common sequence 2 and the suffix sequence 2 are used to amplify double-stranded nucleic acids. In the embodiments herein, the primer 1 is being referred to as “reverse PCR primer” in moderately suppressive PCR, and the primer 2 is being referred to as “forward PCR primer” in the moderately suppressive PCR.
The single-stranded nucleic acid fragment either comprises a target sequence or consists of a target sequence. The target sequence is a desired sequence to be amplified in the mixture of amplified double-stranded nucleic acids. Examples of the target sequence include sequence of 5′ end side of RNA which is of a special interest in biology and is not the product of the truncation of a longer RNA molecule during the experiment.
The common sequence 1 and the common sequence 2 have the same nucleotide length and the nucleotide length is preferably in a range of from 10 to 40, more preferably is in a range of from 15 to 30, still more preferably is in a range of from 20 to 30. This is because in step (b), the nucleotide length of the common sequences 1 and 2 in the above range allows the common sequences 1 and 2 to hybridize with each other.
The common sequence 1 is reverse-complementary the common sequence 2. The reason why the nucleotide sequences of the common sequences 1 and 2 are in the above relation is that the common sequences 1 and 2 can hybridize with each other in step (b). Examples of the common sequence 1 and the common sequence 2 are ones that are the same nucleotide length, but nucleotide sequence in 5′ to 3′ direction of the common sequence 1 is complementary to nucleotide sequence in 3′ to 5′ direction of the common sequence 2.
The common sequence 1 and the common sequence 2 may form a restriction site(s) when annealed, and the number thereof can be one, two, three, four or more.
The suffix sequence 1 and the suffix sequence 2 have the same nucleotide length and the nucleotide length is preferably in a range of from 2 to 10, more preferably is in a range of from 2 to 5, still more preferably is 3 or 4. This is because the nucleotide length of the suffix sequences 1 and 2 in the above range can moderately suppress PCR of step (b), as stated below.
Nucleotide sequence of the suffix sequence 1 is not reverse-complementary to the suffix sequence 2. The reason why the nucleotide sequence directions of the suffix sequences 1 and 2 are in the above relation is that the suffix sequences 1 and 2 cannot hybridize with each other in step (b). Examples of the suffix sequence 1 and the suffix sequence 2 are ones that are the same nucleotide length, but nucleotide sequence in 5′ to 3′ direction of the suffix sequence 1 is not complementary to nucleotide sequence in 3′ to 5′ direction of the suffix sequence 2.
The adapter 1 preferably comprises a prefix sequence 1 at 5′ end of the adapter 1 and the adapter 2 preferably comprises a prefix sequence 2 at 3′ end of the adapter 2. The prefix sequences 1 and 2 have the same or different nucleotide length and the nucleotide lengths are independently and preferably in a range of from 1 to 25, more preferably are from 5 to 20, still more preferably is from 5 to 15. This is because the nucleotide length of the prefix sequences 1 and 2 in the above range can moderately suppress PCR of step (b) together with the suffix sequences 1 and 2.
It is preferable that the nucleotide sequence in of the prefix sequence 1 is not reverse-complementary to nucleotide sequence of the prefix sequence 2 to distinguish the prefix sequences 1 and 2 from the common sequences 1 and 2.
In a case where the adapter 1 comprises the common sequence 1 and the suffix sequence 1, the nucleotide length of the adapter 1 is preferably about 12 to 50, more preferably 20 to 40. In a case where the adapter 1 comprises the common sequence 1, the suffix sequence 1 and the prefix sequence 1, the nucleotide length of the adapter 1 is preferably about 13 to 75, more preferably 25 to 50. The same is true of the adapter 2. This is because in step (b), the nucleotide length of the adapter 1 in the above range allows the adapter 1 to hybridize with the primer 1.
The following scheme is example of the single-stranded nucleic acid where the adapter 1 comprises the prefix sequence 1.
As described below, preparation of the single-stranded nucleic acid in step (a) preferably comprises attaching a sequence reverse-complementary to the adapter 2 to 5′ end of a single-stranded template nucleic acid comprising a sequence reverse-complementary to the single-stranded nucleic acid fragment, and conducting nucleic acid strand synthesis reaction with a primer comprising both the adapter 1 at 5′ end side thereof and a sequence complementary to at least a part of the single-stranded nucleic acid fragment at 3′ end thereof. However, there is no intention to limit the present invention to the above mode.
The adapter 2 is preferably introduced through the tail of an oligonucleotide (e.g. also referred to as “strand-switching oligonucleotide” and “TS oligo” herein) and the adapter 1 is preferably introduced through the tail of a primer 3 by means of nucleic acid strand synthesis reaction such as reverse transcription reaction using the CAPswitch method. In the embodiments herein, the primer 3 is being referred to as “random RT primer” in the moderately suppressive PCR. For example, in a case where the single-stranded template nucleic acid comprising a sequence complementary to the single-stranded nucleic acid fragment has a cap structure such as 7-methylguanosine caps at 5′ end thereof, or one or more extra 3′-ribonucleotide such as 3′-cytidine at 5′ end thereof, said step (a) can comprise nucleic acid strand synthesis reaction using the single-stranded template nucleic acid; an oligonuculeotide comprising at 3′ end thereof at least one nucleotide that can hybridize to the extra 3′-ribonucleotide at 3′ end of the single-stranded nucleic acid fragment, a sequence reverse-complementary to the adapter 2, and the primer 3 comprising at least a random sequence or an oligo-T at 3′ end thereof and a sequence corresponding to the adapter 1. In the case where the single-stranded template nucleic acid has 7-methylguanosine cap(s) or adenosine cap(s), example of the step (a) comprises reverse transcription reaction using RNA comprising a sequence complementary to the single-stranded nucleic acid fragment, the oligonucleotide comprising at least an oligo-riboguanosine or an oligo-riboadenosine at 3′ end thereof and a sequence reverse-complementary to the adapter 2, and the primer 3 comprising at least a random sequence or an oligo-T at 3′ end thereof and a sequence corresponding to the adapter 1.
The following scheme shows an example of step (a) where the primer 3 comprises random sequence at 3′ end thereof and the oligonucleotide comprises oligo-riboguanosine at 3′ end thereof.
In the above case, the reverse transcriptase reaches 3′ end of RNA in course of reverse transcription reaction with the primer 3 and then the reverse transcribed cDNA that is complementary to RNA adds some extra cytosine residues to 3′ end of the cDNA if a cap is present at 5′ end of RNA. The oligonucleotide having some guanine residues at 3′ end thereof can hybridize with the extra cytosine residues added to RNA. This hybrid is then extended by the reverse transcription reaction. The remarkable point is that the above oligonucleotide hybridizes with the first strand cDNA, not with RNA.
The oligo-riboguanosine and the oligo-riboadenosine mean a sequence consisting of consecutive riboguanosine or riboadenosine residues. In the oligonucleotide, the use of the oligo-riboguanosine or the oligo-riboadenosine depends on 5′ end modification of the single-stranded template nucleic acid. When the modification is a cap, the oligo-riboguanosine can be employed. When the modification is an ADP moiety, the oligo-riboadenosine can be employed.
The random sequence consists of a random sequence and the oligo-T consists of consecutive thymine residues sequence, which can specifically hybridize with a part of the single-stranded template nucleic acid.
The primer 1 used in step (b) comprises both a part of the common sequence 1 and the whole suffix sequence 1. The primer 1 preferably comprises the prefix sequence 1 at 5′ end thereof. Whenever the adapter 1 comprises the prefix sequence 1, the primer 1 comprises the prefix sequence 1. However, when the primer 1 comprises the prefix sequence 1, the adapter 1 may be a sequence not comprising the prefix sequence 1.
The primer 2 used in step (b) comprises a sequence reverse-complementary to a part of the common sequence 2 and a sequence reverse-complementary to the whole suffix sequence 2, and preferably comprises a sequence reverse-complementary to the prefix sequence 2 at 5′ end thereof. Whenever the adapter 2 comprises the prefix sequence 2, the primer 2 comprises a sequence reverse-complementary to the prefix sequence 2. However, when the primer 2 comprises a sequence reverse-complementary to the prefix sequence 2, the adapter 2 may be a sequence not comprising the prefix sequence 2.
The PCR conducted in step (b) can carried out under the general PCR conditions such as 5 min 95° C., n×(10 s at 95° C., 15 s at 65° C., 6 min at 68° C.) and using hot start, wherein n represents the number of cycles, for example 30.
In the PCR, a sequence reverse-complementary to the single-stranded nucleic acid is extended starting from the primer 1 hybridized with the single-stranded nucleic acid as a template to obtain a double-stranded nucleic acid. The double-stranded nucleic acid is then amplified by using the primer 1 and the primer 2 under the general conditions. The PCR conditions can be modified optimally in view of the nucleotide length and sequence of the sequence to amplify.
The single-stranded adapter 1 may comprise an additional sequence, named extra sequence 1, at 3′ end of the suffix sequence 1. As well, the single-stranded adapter 2 may comprise an extra sequence 2 at 3′ end of the suffix sequence 2, regardless of whether the single-stranded adapter 1 comprises the extra sequence 1 or not. The extra sequences 1 and/or 2 can hybridize with a primer used in order to sequence the single-stranded nucleic acid fragment by using methods known to persons having ordinary skills in the art. Each length of the extra sequences 1 and 2 is one capable of hybridizing with the primer under the condition of annealing step in a general PCR, which is such as, but not limited to, 15 to 30 bp.
The method of the subject invention is that the dimers that contain any combination of the adapters can be also suppressed. Although the adapter 1 and the adapter 2 are not fully complementary, they share the common sequence (see
The method of the subject invention allows in a single reaction the suppression of the smallest single-stranded nucleic acid and the discrimination of the single-stranded nucleic acid that is flanked by two identical adapters. This was not possible in suppressive PCR published by Chenchick et al.
As shown in
In the worst scenario, the yield of an amplification during which half of the adapters are occupied by primers that do not allow the sequence complementary to the single-stranded nucleic acid to extend (because the suffix sequence 1 and the suffix sequence 2 mismatch) would be (¾)n of a normal PCR, where n is the number of cycles. For 30 cycles, this is a reduction of more than 5000 times. However, by using an annealing temperature that is not too different from the melting temperature of nucleic acid duplexes of the common sequence, it is possible to let the primer 1 and the primer 2 compete efficiently for their best target sequence, and obtain an acceptable yield, while benefiting of the suppressive and discriminative advantages of the suppressing PCR method.
The comparison of the method of the subject invention with suppressive PCR is shown in the following table.
As shown in Table 1, the method of the subject invention is superior to suppressive PCR in terms of the moderate of suppression, the circumstance and length of molecule to be suppressed, and the suppression for molecules that use two different adapters. Furthermore, the method of the subject invention can suppress amplification of primer dimers, resulting in amplifying a small quantity of RNA e.g. polysomal poly A− RNA, which cannot be analyzed with CAGE.
Surprisingly, the method of the subject invention can keep directionality and suppress small artifacts that cannot be achieved by suppressive PCR.
The use of the primers 1 and 2 that match the common sequence at 5′ end side and the suffix sequence at 3′ end side in the method of the subject invention is very innovative. This is because taking into consideration suppressive PCR, it is even recommended that the PCR primers match only the 5′ half or the common sequence but not the whole primer.
The method of the subject invention can provide double-stranded cDNA comprising a sequence corresponding to a 5′ end side sequence of RNA. Therefore, the 5′ end side sequence of RNA that is used as the single-stranded template nucleic acid can be determined by sequencing the double-stranded nucleic acids in the mixture of amplified double-stranded nucleic acids obtained by the method of the subject invention. the sequencing of the double-stranded nucleic acids can be carried out (i) from 3′ end side to 5′ end side, (ii) from 5′ end side to 3′ end side, or (iii) simultaneously from both 3′ and 5′ end sides by means of the methods known to those skilled in the art.
The embodiments of the above (i) are being shown in the following Examples 1 to 8. The embodiments of the above (ii) are being shown in the following Examples 9 and 11. Furthermore, the embodiment of the above (iii) is being shown in the following Example 10.
The method for determining the 5′ end side sequence of RNA in the case of the above (i) may comprise moderately suppressive PCR followed by, but not limited to, the steps of cleavage of the 3′ end sides of the double-stranded nucleic acids with a restriction enzyme such as, but not limited to, EcoP15I; ligation of an adapter at the cleavage site; 2nd PCR; exonuclease treatment; and then sequencing the double-stranded nucleic acids obtained as the 2nd PCR production. The method for determining the 5′ end side sequence of RNA in the case of the above (ii) may comprise moderately suppressive PCR followed by, but not limited to, the steps of 2nd PCR or inner 3′ RACE, 454 adapter PCR, and then sequencing the double-stranded nucleic acids obtained as the 454 adapter PCR production. The method for determining the 5′ end side sequence of RNA in the case of the above (iii) may comprise moderately suppressive PCR followed by, but not limited to, the steps of 2nd PCR, and then sequencing the double-stranded nucleic acids obtained as the 2nd PCR production. As well, the method for determining the 5′ end side sequence of RNA in each case of the above (i) to (iii) may comprise moderately suppressive PCR followed by the known method such as, but not limited to, the method for utilizing the 5′ end of mRNA for cloning and analysis disclosed in WO 03/106672, including sequencing the double-stranded nucleic acids.
The following scheme shows a strategy of determining the 5′ end side sequence of RNA used as the single-stranded template nucleic acid by sequencing from 3′ end side to 5′ end side the double-stranded nucleic acids in the mixture of amplified double-stranded nucleic acids obtained by the method of the subject invention.
The following scheme shows a strategy of determining the 5′ end side sequence of RNA used as the single-stranded template nucleic acid by sequencing from 5′ end side to 3′ end side or from both end side the double-stranded nucleic acids in the mixture of amplified double-stranded nucleic acids obtained by the method of the subject invention.
The following scheme shows an another strategy of determining the 5′ end side sequence of RNA used as the single-stranded template nucleic acid by sequencing from 5′ end side to 3′ end side the double-stranded nucleic acids in the mixture of amplified double-stranded nucleic acids obtained by the method of the subject invention.
According to the method of the subject invention, a reverse transcription reaction is executed with RNA as a single-stranded template nucleic acid, the oligonucleotide, and the primer 3 to produce the single-stranded nucleic acid comprising the adapters 1 and 2 as well as cDNA complementary to RNA. Moderately-suppressive PCR is then conducted with the single-stranded nucleic acid as a template as well as the primers 1 and 2 to amplify the double-stranded nucleic acids. Optionally, there may be additional PCRs such as, but not limited to, nested PCR and 454 PCR and the other treatments suitable for the following sequencing. As the result, the sequence can be determined by carrying out the sequencing with the methods known by those skilled in the art such as, but not limited to, 454 Sequencing.
Each of the sequencings in the case of the above (i) to (iii) has benefits different from each other. For example, in this case, no protocol to make 3′ RACE analysis with random primers would be used. As well, the sequencing of the double-stranded nucleic acids from both 5′ and 3′ end sides at the same time can analyze inner exons with a shorter protocol that does not involve tag cleavage and amplification.
The presented method is embodied in the following protocol, used create a library of 5′ end sequence tags (CAGE tags, [Shiraki 2003, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.]) suitable for direct sequencing with Illumina-Solexa platform.
5 to 10 ng of total RNA microdissected from fixed cryostat histological sections were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 5 μl with 50 μmol of strand-switching oligonucleotide (TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG, wherein rG shows riboguanosine), 10 μmol of random RT primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTN15), 10 pmol of polythimine RT primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT18) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 20 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 0.5 mM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 0.75 M betaine (WAKO), 0.41 M D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque), 3.4% D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and 400 units of SuperScriptII (Invitrogen), and incubated at 12° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 45 min, 75° C. for 10 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles, defined as the last cycle before the intensity of the product ceases to increase. 10 μl aliquots were taken every two cycles and analyzed on 1% agarose gel. 2 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 250 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM forward PCR primer (TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC), 100 nM reverse PCR primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min 95° C., n×(10 s at 95° C., 15 s at 65° C., 6 min at 68° C.) and using hot start (
Half of the pooled cDNA was digested in 4 reactions of 300 μl each, using 150 units of EcoP15I (NEB), 1× buffer 3 (NEB), 1 mM ATP (NEB), 1×BSA (NEB) incubated at 37° C. for 4 hours. The low molecular weight cleavage products were purified through the Microcon YM-100 membranes (Millipore) and the flow-through was concentrated on Microcon YM-10 (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Equimolar amounts of the teo oligonucleotides (NNAGCTGTAGAACTCTGAACCTGT and ACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGCT), were annealed in a water bath heated at 95° C. and left to cool down to room temperature. to form ligation adapters. 2 μM adapters were ligated to 15 μl of the EcoP15I cleavage products 1200 units of T4 DNA ligase (NEB) in 30 μl and incubated for 16 hours at 16° C. in a water bath. Optimal number of cycles for the ligation product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 5 μM of forward PCR primer (AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAG), 5 μM of reverse PCR primer (CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGATAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAG), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa). The program was 5 min 95° C., n×(20 s at 95° C., 20 s at 57° C., 20 s at 68° C.). 6 PCR reactions in 100 μl for each sample were performed.
The excess of the primers was digested with 20 units of Exonuclease I (TaKaRa) at 37° C. for 30 min and then the enzyme was heat inactivated at 55° C. for 15 min. Then the PCR products were purified by electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide gel and the band corresponding to the expected size (112 base pairs) was cut, passed through a syringe to break the structure of polyacrylamide and the DNA was extracted at R.T. in microtube on rotation with 800 μl of 1× TE buffer over night. The tubes were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant was collected. 600 μl of 1×TE buffer were added to the polyacrylamide in the microtube and let to rotate at room temperature for 1 hour. This step was repeated once more. Then for each sample, all the collected fractions were pooled together and passed through a Microspin filter (GE Healthcare) to eliminate residual traces of polyacrylamide. A total of 2 ml of filtrate was concentrated to 100 μl passing through a Microcon YM-10 column (Millipore), further purified using a Qiaquick PCR purification column (Qiagen) and eluted in 100 μl of EB buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5). The purity and the concentration of the sample was estimated by Nanodrop UV spectrophotometer and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and an aliquot of 10 μl was analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to check for the correct size of the recovered DNA.
The library was sequenced using a Illumina-Solexa platform. 2,859,511 reads were recorded, and 2,535,405 CAGE tags were extracted. 33,558 were mapped to mouse ribosomal DNA and 2,316,861 to the mouse genome (assembly mm9). The most frequent tag mapped to the ubb gene on the chromosome 14 in the region 46,703,702-46,703,726 and was counted 18,116 times. The very low proportion of tags matching ribosomal sequences indicates that capped molecules were correctly discriminated from non-capped molecules like the very abundant 28 S and 18 S ribosomal RNAs. The tags identify many 5′ ends, as exemplified by the tag GAGTGACGAGAGGCTTTGTCCGGTT that matches with the 5′end of the ubb transcript, which encodes for the ubiquitin B protein, important for neuronal survival.
In this experiment, total RNA from the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Hep G2 (ATCC number HB-8065) was used to create CAGE tags by random priming.
50 ng of total RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 100 μmol of strand-switching oligonucleotide (TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG) and 10 μmol of random RT primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTN15), in 1.62 μM D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque) and 13.3% D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 10 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 0.5 mM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 0.75 M betaine (WAKO) and 400 units of SuperScriptII (Invitrogen), and incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 45 min, 75° C. for 10 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles (
All the cDNAs were digested at 37° C. for 4 hours in a volume of 96 gi each, using 100 units of EcoP15I (NEB), 1× buffer 3 (NEB), 1 mM ATP (NEB), 1×BSA (NEB). The low molecular weight cleavage products were purified through the Microcon YM-100 membranes (Millipore) and the flow-through was concentrated on Microcon YM-10 (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The two oligonucleotides NNACCCTGTAGAACTCTGAACCTGT and ACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGCT were annealed in 10 μl at 1 mM each in a thermocycler heated at 95° C. and left to cool down to room temperature. to form ligation adapters. 1 μmol adapters were ligated to 10 μl of the EcoP15I cleavage products using 10 μl of Mighty Ligation Mix (TaKaRa) and incubated for 16 hours at 16° C. in a water bath. Optimal number of cycles for the ligation product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 5 μM of forward PCR primer (AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAG), 5 μM of reverse PCR primer (CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGATAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAG), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) and 1 μl of ligation product. The program was 2 min 95° C., n×(10 s at 95° C., 10 s at 57° C.). For the large-scale amplification, 3×100 μl of PCR were performed with 1 μl of ligation product in each tube and 12 cycles.
The excess of the primers was digested with 20 units of Exonuclease I (TaKaRa) at 37° C. for 30 min and then the enzyme was heat inactivated at 55° C. for 15 min. Then the PCR products were purified by electrophoresis on 6% polyacrylamide gel and the band corresponding to the expected size (112 base pairs) was cut, passed through a syringe to break the structure of polyacrylamide and the DNA was extracted at R.T. in microtube on rotation with 800 μl of 1× TE buffer over night. The tubes were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant was collected. 600 μl of 1×TE buffer were added to the polyacrylamide in the microtube and let to rotate at room temperature for 1 hour. This step was repeated once more. Then for each sample, all the collected fractions were pooled together and passed through a Microspin filter (GE Healthcare) to eliminate residual traces of polyacrylamide. A total of 2 ml of filtrate was concentrated to 100 ml passing through a Microcon YM-10 column (Millipore). The purity and the concentration of the sample was estimated by Nanodrop UV spectrophotometer and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and an aliquot of 10 μl was analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to check for the correct size of the recovered DNA.
The library was sequenced using a Illumina-Solexa platform. 4,314,825 reads were recorded, and 1,972,665 CAGE tags were extracted. 215,933 were mapped to mouse ribosomal DNA and 1,458,717 to the mouse genome (assembly mm9). The most frequent tag mapped to the TF gene on the chromosome 3 in the region 134,947,926-134,947,950 and was counted 12,446 times. The very low proportion of tags matching ribosomal sequences indicates that capped molecules were correctly discriminated from non-capped molecules like the very abundant 28 S and 18 S ribosomal RNAs. The tags identify many 5′ ends, as exemplified by the tag GACAGAAGCGAGTCCGACTGTGCTC that matches with the 5′ end of the TF transcript, which encodes for the transferrin protein, that is important for iron metabolism and abundant in liver.
In this experiment, polysomal polyA− RNA from the K562 cell line (ATCC lot number 4607240) was used to create CAGE tags by random priming.
500 ng of polysomal polyA− RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 50 μM of strand-switching oligonucleotide (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG-3′) and 5 μM of random RT primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTN15), in 264 μM D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque) and 1.32 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 10.5 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (WAKO) and 200 units of SuperScript (Invitrogen), and incubated at 22° C. for 10 mM, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 mM in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles, defined as the last cycle before the intensity of the product ceases to increase. 1 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM forward PCR primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC-3′), 100 nM reverse PCR primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT-3′), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 95° C., n×(15 s at 95° C., 10 s at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), 15 min at 68° C. and using hot start. 10 μl aliquots were taken every two cycles and analyzed on 2% agarose gel. (
All the cDNAs were digested at 37° C. for 4 hours in a volume of 100 μl each, using 100 units of EcoP15I (NEB), 1× buffer 3 (NEB), 1 mM ATP (NEB), 1×BSA (NEB). The low molecular weight cleavage products were purified through the Microcon YM-100 membranes (Millipore) and the flow-through was concentrated on Microcon YM-10 (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The two oligonucleotides 5′-NNGTCCTGTAGAACTCTGAACCTGT-3′ and 5′-ACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGGAC-3′ were annealed in 10 μl at 1 mM each in a thermocycler heated at 95° C. and left to cool down to room temperature to form ligation adapters. 10 μmol adapters were ligated to 10 μl of the EcoP15I cleavage products using 10 μl of Mighty Ligation Mix (TaKaRa) and incubated for 16 hours at 16° C. in a thermocycler. Optimal number of cycles for the ligation product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 50 nM of forward PCR primer (5′-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAG-3′), 50 nM of reverse PCR primer (5′-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGATAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAG-3′), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) and 1 μl of ligation product in a total volume of 100 μl. The program was 2 min 95° C., n×(10 s at 95° C., 10 s at 57° C.). For the large-scale amplification, 5×100 μl of PCR were performed with 1 μl of ligation product in each tube and 8 cycles (
The excess of the primers was digested with 5 units of Exonuclease I (TaKaRa) per 1000 PCR reaction at 37° C. for 15 min and then the enzyme was heat inactivated at 55° C. for 15 min. Then the PCR products were purified by electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gel and the band corresponding to the expected size (112 base pairs) was cut and extracted by Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) (
The library was sequenced using a illumine-Solexa platform. 23,204,073 reads were recorded, and 17,902,698 CAGE tags were extracted. 26.31% of these tags were mapped to human ribosomal DNA and 82.42% to the human genome.
In this experiment, nucleolus total RNA from the K562 cell line was used to create CAGE tags by random priming.
500 ng of nucleolus total RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 50 μM of strand-switching oligonucleotide (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG-3′) and 5 μM of random RT primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTN15-3′) in 264 μM D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque) and 1.32 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 10.5 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (WAKO) and 200 units of SuperScriptII (Invitrogen), and incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 mM in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles, defined as the last cycle before the intensity of the product ceases to increase. 1 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM forward PCR primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC-3′), 100 nM reverse PCR primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT-3′), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 95° C., n×(15 s at 95° C., 10 s at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), 15 min at 68° C. and using hot start. 10 μl aliquots were taken every two cycles and analyzed on 2% agarose gel (
All the cDNAs were digested at 37° C. for 4 hours in a volume of 100 μl each, using 100 units of EcoP15I (NEB), 1× buffer 3 (NEB), 1 mM ATP (NEB), 1×BSA (NEB). The low molecular weight cleavage products were purified through the Microcon YM-100 membranes (Millipore) and the flow-through was concentrated on Microcon YM-10 (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The two oligonucleotides (5′-NNGGACTGTAGAACTCTGAACCTGT-3′) and (5′-ACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGTCC-3′) were annealed in 10 μl at 1 mM each in a thermocycler heated at 95° C. and left to cool down to room temperature to form ligation adapters. 10 μmol adapters were ligated to 10 μl of the EcoP 15I cleavage products using 10 μl of Mighty Ligation Mix (TaKaRa) and incubated for 16 hours at 16° C. in a thermocycler. Optimal number of cycles for the ligation product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 50 nM of forward PCR primer (5′-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAG-3′), 50 nM of reverse PCR primer (5′-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGATAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAG-3′), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) and 1 μl of ligation product in a total volume of 100 μl. The program was 2 min 95° C., n×(10 s at 95° C., 10 s at 57° C.). For the large-scale amplification, 5×100 μl of PCR were performed with 1 μl of ligation product in each tube and 8 cycles (
The excess of the primers was digested with 5 units of Exonuclease I (TaKaRa) per 100 μl PCR reaction at 37° C. for 15 min and then the enzyme was heat inactivated at 55° C. for 15 min. Then the PCR products were purified by electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gel and the band corresponding to the expected size (112 base pairs) was cut and extracted by Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) (
The library was sequenced using a illumine-Solexa platform. 27,839,343 reads were recorded, and 21,856,936 CAGE tags were extracted. 26.01% of these tags were mapped to human ribosomal DNA and 76.58% to the human genome.
In this experiment, nuclear plasma total RNA from the K562 cell line was used to create CAGE tags by random priming.
500 ng of nuclear plasma total RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 50 μM of strand-switching oligonucleotide (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG-3′) and 5 μM of random RT primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTN15-3′) in 264 μM D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque) and 1.32 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 10.5 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (WAKO) and 200 units of SuperScriptII (Invitrogen), and incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles, defined as the last cycle before the intensity of the product ceases to increase. 1 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM forward PCR primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC-3′), 100 nM reverse PCR primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT-3′), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 95° C., n×(15 s at 95° C., 10 s at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), 15 min at 68° C. and using hot start. 10 μl aliquots were taken every two cycles and analyzed on 2% agarose gel (
All the cDNAs were digested at 37° C. for 4 hours in a volume of 100 μl each, using 100 units of EcoP15I (NEB), 1× buffer 3 (NEB), 1 mM ATP (NEB), 1×BSA (NEB). The low molecular weight cleavage products were purified through the Microcon YM-100 membranes (Millipore) and the flow-through was concentrated on Microcon YM-10 (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The two oligonucleotides (5′-NNGAGCTGTAGAACTCTGAACCTGT-3′) and (5′-ACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGCTC-3′) were annealed in 10 μl at 1 mM each in a thermocycler heated at 95° C. and left to cool down to room temperature to form ligation adapters. 10 μmol adapters were ligated to 10 μl of the EcoP15I cleavage products using 10 μl of Mighty Ligation Mix (TaKaRa) and incubated for 16 hours at 16° C. in a thermocycler. Optimal number of cycles for the ligation product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 50 nM of forward PCR primer (5′-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAG-3′), 50 nM of reverse PCR primer (5′-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGATAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAG-3′), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) and 1 μl of ligation product in a total volume of 100 μl. The program was 2 min 95° C., n×(10 s at 95° C., 10 s at 57° C.). For the large-scale amplification, 5×100 μl of PCR were performed with 1 μl of ligation product in each tube and 8 cycles (
The excess of the primers was digested with 5 units of Exonuclease I (TaKaRa) per 100 μl PCR reaction at 37° C. for 15 min and then the enzyme was heat inactivated at 55° C. for 15 min. Then the PCR products were purified by electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gel and the band corresponding to the expected size (112 base pairs) was cut and extracted by Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) (
The library was sequenced using a illumine-Solexa platform. 25,305,506 reads were recorded, and 20,328,111 CAGE tags were extracted. 10.95% of these tags were mapped to human ribosomal DNA and 86.30% to the human genome.
In this experiment, chromatin total RNA from the K562 cell line was used to create CAGE tags by random priming.
500 ng of chromatin total RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 50 μM of strand-switching oligonucleotide (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG-3′) and 5 μM of random RT primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTN15-3′) in 264 μM D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque) and 1.32 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 10.5 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (WAKO) and 200 units of SuperScriptII (Invitrogen), and incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles, defined as the last cycle before the intensity of the product ceases to increase. 1 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM forward PCR primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC-3′), 100 nM reverse PCR primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT-3′), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 95° C., n×(15 s at 95° C., 10 s at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), 15 min at 68° C. and using hot start. 10 μl aliquots were taken every two cycles and analyzed on 2% agarose gel (
All the cDNAs were digested at 37° C. for 4 hours in a volume of 100 μl each, using 100 units of EcoP15I (NEB), 1× buffer 3 (NEB), 1 mM ATP (NEB), 1×BSA (NEB). The low molecular weight cleavage products were purified through the Microcon YM-100 membranes (Millipore) and the flow-through was concentrated on Microcon YM-10 (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The two oligonucleotides (5′-NNGCTCTGTAGAACTCTGAACCTGT-3′) and (5′-ACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGAGC-3′) were annealed in 10 μl at 1 mM each in a thermocycler heated at 95° C. and left to cool down to room temperature to form ligation adapters. 10 μmol adapters were ligated to 10 μl of the EcoP15I cleavage products using 10 μl of Mighty Ligation Mix (TaKaRa) and incubated for 16 hours at 16° C. in a thermocycler. Optimal number of cycles for the ligation product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 50 nM of forward PCR primer (5′-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAG-3′), 50 nM of reverse PCR primer (5′-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGATAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAG-3′), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) and 1 μl of ligation product in a total volume of 100 μl The program was 2 min 95° C., n×(10 s at 95° C., 10 s at 57° C.). For the large-scale amplification, 5×100 μl of PCR were performed with 1 μl of ligation product in each tube and 8 cycles (
The excess of the primers was digested with 5 units of Exonuclease I (TaKaRa) per 100 μl PCR reaction at 37° C. for 15 min and then the enzyme was heat inactivated at 55° C. for 15 min. Then the PCR products were purified by electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gel and the band corresponding to the expected size (112 base pairs) was cut and extracted by Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) (
The library was sequenced using a illumine-Solexa platform. 21,253,077 reads were recorded, and 16,137,405 CAGE tags were extracted. 5.28% of these tags were mapped to human ribosomal DNA and 86.71% to the human genome.
In this experiment, total RNA were prepared from microdissected brain tissues from the rat neonate to create CAGE tags by random priming. The stages of rat neonate are 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 18, 28 days. The microdissected samples were containing between 10 and 20 ng of RNA. We also used commercial total RNA for control (whole embryo and whole adult brain).
Between 10 and 20 ng of total RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 50 μM of strand-switching oligonucleotide (TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG) and 5 μM of random RT primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTN15), in 264 μM D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque) and 1.32 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 10.5 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (WAKO) and 200 units of SuperScriptII (Invitrogen), and incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles, defined as the last cycle before the intensity of the product ceases to increase. 1.5 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM forward PCR primer (TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC), 100 nM reverse PCR primer primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 95° C., n×(15 s at 95° C., 10 s at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), 15 min at 68° C. and using hot start. 5 μl aliquots were taken every two cycles and analyzed on 2% agarose gel (
All the cDNAs were digested at 37° C. for 4 hours in a volume of 100 μl each, using 100 units of EcoP15I (NEB), 1× buffer 3 (NEB), 1 mM ATP (NEB), 1×BSA (NEB). The low molecular weight cleavage products were purified through the Microcon YM-100 membranes (Millipore) and the flow-through was concentrated on Microcon YM-10 (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The nine pairs of oligonucleotides, which were
5′-ACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGCTC-3′, were annealed in 10 μl at 1 mM each in a thermocycler heated at 95° C. and left to cool down to room temperature to form ligation adapters. 10 pmol adapters were ligated to 10 μl of the EcoP15I cleavage products using 10 μl of Mighty Ligation Mix (TaKaRa) and incubated for 16 hours at 16° C. in a thermocycler. Optimal number of cycles for the ligation product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 50 nM of forward PCR primer (AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAG), 50 nM of reverse PCR primer (CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGATAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAG), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) and 2 μl of ligation product in a total volume of 100 μl. The program was 2 min 95° C., n×(10 s at 95° C., 10 s at 57° C.). For the large-scale amplification, 2˜4×100 μl of PCR were performed with 2 μl of ligation product in each tube and 13 cycles.
The excess of the primers was digested with 5 units of Exonuclease I (TaKaRa) per 100 μl PCR reaction at 37° C. for 15 min and then the enzyme was heat inactivated at 55° C. for 15 min. Then the PCR products were purified by electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gel and the band corresponding to the expected size (112 base pairs) was cut and extracted by Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) (
In this experiment, as well as above, total RNA were prepared from microdissected brain tissues from the rat neonate to create CAGE tags by random priming. The stages of rat neonate are 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 18, 28 days. The microdissected samples were containing between 10 and 20 ng of RNA. We also used commercial total RNA for control (whole embryo and whole adult brain).
Between 10 and 20 ng of total RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 50 μM of strand-switching oligonucleotide (TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG) and 5 μM of random RT primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTN15), in 264 μM D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque) and 1.32 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 10.5 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (WAKO) and 200 units of SuperScriptII (Invitrogen), and incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles, defined as the last cycle before the intensity of the product ceases to increase. 1.5 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM forward PCR primer (TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC), 100 nM reverse PCR primer primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 95° C., n×(15 s at 95° C., 10 s at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), 15 min at 68° C. and using hot start. 5 μl aliquots were taken every two cycles and analyzed on 2% agarose gel (
All the cDNAs were digested at 37° C. for 4 hours in a volume of 100 μl each, using 100 units of EcoP15I (NEB), 1× buffer 3 (NEB), 1 mM ATP (NEB), 1×BSA (NEB). The low molecular weight cleavage products were purified through the Microcon YM-100 membranes (Millipore) and the flow-through was concentrated on Microcon YM-10 (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The nine pairs of oligonucleotides, which were
5′-ACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGAGC-3′, were annealed in 10 μl at 1 mM each in a thermocycler heated at 95° C. and left to cool down to room temperature to form ligation adapters. 10 μmol adapters were ligated to 10 μl of the EcoP 15I cleavage products using 10 μl of Mighty Ligation Mix (TaKaRa) and incubated for 16 hours at 16° C. in a thermocycler. Optimal number of cycles for the ligation product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 50 nM of forward PCR primer (AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAG), 50 nM of reverse PCR primer (CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGATAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAG), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) and 2 μl of ligation product in a total volume of 100 μl. The program was 2 min 95° C., n×(10 s at 95° C., 10 s at 57° C.). For the large-scale amplification, 2˜4×100 μl of PCR were performed with 2 μl of ligation product in each tube and 13 cycles.
The excess of the primers was digested with 5 units of Exonuclease I (TaKaRa) per 100 μl PCR reaction at 37° C. for 15 min and then the enzyme was heat inactivated at 55° C. for 15 min. Then the PCR products were purified by electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gel and the band corresponding to the expected size (112 base pairs) was cut and extracted by Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) (
In this experiment, total RNA from the C2C12 MBc WT cell line was used to create CAGE tags by random priming.
1 μg of total RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 5 μM of random RT primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTN15-3′), in 264 μM D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque) and 1.32 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 10.5 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (WAKO) and 200 units of SuperScriptII (Invitrogen), and incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles, defined as the last cycle before the intensity of the product ceases to increase. 2.0 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM L1-6 forward PCR primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCACAAGAAGCCTACAGGACT-3′) or L1-13 forward PCR primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCGCCTACAGGACTCCAAATA-3′), 100 nM reverse PCR primer (GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 95° C., n×(15 s at 95° C., 10 at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), 15 min at 68° C. and using hot start. 5 μl aliquots were taken every two cycles and analyzed on 1.5% agarose gel (
Inner 3′ RACE PCR was performed with a part of sequencing adapters. 2.0 μl of PCR products were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM L1-6 454-A up forward PCR primer (5′-CATCTGTTCCCTCCCTGTCTCAGACAAGAAGCCTACAGGACT-3′) or L1-13 454-A up forward PCR primer (5′-CATCTGTTCCCTCCCTGTCTCAGGCCTACAGGACTCCAAATA-3′), 100 nM reverse 454-B up PCR primer (5′-CTATCCCCTGTTGCGTGTCTCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT-3′), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 94° C., 35 cycles×(30 s at 94° C., 30 s at 60° C., 2 min at 72° C.), 15 min at 72° C. and using hot start. PCR products were purified by QIAGEN MinElute column (Qiagen) and analyzed on 1.5% agarose gel (
For synthesizing the biotinyilated PCR products with biotinylated primers, 20 ng (2.0 of inner PCR products were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM 454-A up forward PCR primer (5′-CCATCTCATCCCTGCGTGTCCCATCTGTTCCCTCCCTGTCTCAG-3′), 100 nM reverse 454-B up biotinylated PCR primer (5′-Biotin-CCTATCCCCTGTGTGCCTTGCCTATCCCCTGTTGCGTGTCTCAG-3′), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 94° C., 5 cycles×(30 s at 94° C., 30 s at 60° C., 2 min at 72° C.), 15 min at 72° C. and using hot start. PCR products were purified and concentrated by QIAGEN MinElute column (Qiagen) and analyzed on 1.5% agarose gel (
For single strand DNA separation, PCR products were treated with 0.1N NaOH and single strand PCR products were binded to M-270 magnetic beads (invitrogen) and separated. Separated ssDNAs were purified by MinElute purification kit (Qiagen) and their elution volume was 15 d. The purity and the concentration of the samples were analyzed with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. The library (L1-6 and L1-13) were mixed each, and finally sequenced using FLX-454 sequencer.
In this experiment, nuclear polyA− RNA, nuclear polyA+ RNA, cytoplasm polyA-RNA and cytoplasm polyA+ RNA from the K562 cell line were used to create CAGE tags by random priming.
The volume of water was reduced to 2 μl each by centrifugal evaporation at room temperature in the presence of 100 ng of RNA, 0.66 M D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque), 3.3 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO), 100 μM of TS oligonucleotide (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCA(rG)(rG)(rG)-3′), 10 μM of random RT primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCGAACCGCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNN-3′ was added to nuclear polyA− RNA, 5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCGAACCGCTCTTCCGATCTCGANNNNNN-3′ was added to nuclear polyA+ RNA, 5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCGAACCGCTCTTCCGATCTATC-3′ was added to cytoplasm polyA− RNA and 5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCGAACCGCTCTTCCGATCTGCTNNNNNN-3′ was added to cytoplasm polyA+ RNA). The mixture was then heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a thermocycler(MWG) and transferred quickly on a ice/water mixture, to avoid the formation of secondary structures. Reverse transcription and template switching were accomplished together in a volume of 10.5 μl with the following components: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (Spiess and Ivell, 2002) (WAKO), and 200 units of SuperScriptII (Invitrogen). And they were incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis a small scale moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed to evaluate the optimal number of cycles, defined as the last cycle before the intensity of the product ceases to increase. 1 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.0 μM forward PCR primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC-3′), 1.0 μM reverse PCR primer (5′-TGACGTCGTCTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCGAACC-3′), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 95° C., n×(15 s at 95° C., 10 s at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), ∞ at 4° C. and using hot start. 10 μl aliquots were taken every two cycles and analyzed on 1.5% agarose gel. (
Then PCR reaction was performed again. Optimal number of cycles for the PCR product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 1.0 μM of forward PCR primer (5′-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTAGTCGAACTGAAGG-3′), 1.0 μM of reverse PCR primer (5′-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATCGGTCTCGGCATTCCTGCTGAACCGCT CTTCCGATCT-3′), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 2.5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) and 20 ng of PCR product in a total volume of 100 The program was 5 min 95° C., 10 sec at 55° C., 2 min at 68° C., n×(15 sec at 95° C., 10 sec at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), ∞ at 4° C. For the large-scale amplification, 5×50 μl of PCR were performed with 20 ng of PCR product in each tube. (
In this experiment, total RNA from HepG2 cell line (human) was used to create CAGE tags by random priming.
Reverse transcription reaction started by mixing 1 μg of RNA with 0.66 M D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque), 3.3 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO), 100 μM of each TS oligonucleotide (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCA(rG)(rG)(rG)-3′, 5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCA(rA)(rA)(rA)-3′, 5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCA(rC)(rC)(rC)-3′ and 5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCA(rU)(rU)(rU)-3′, wherein rA, rC and rU show riboadenosine, ribocytosine and ribouridine, respectively.) and 10 μM of random RT primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCGAACCGCTCTTCCGATC-3′. The volume of the each mixture was kept 2 μl by centrifugal evaporation and then heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a thermocycler(MWG) and transferred quickly on a ice/water mixture, to avoid the formation of secondary structures. Reverse transcription and template switching were accomplished together in a volume of 10.5 μl with the following components: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (Spiess and Ivell, 2002) (WAKO), and 200 units of SuperScript III (Invitrogen). And they were incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. To guess the optimum cycles, Real-time PCR was performed by using 1 μl of 5× diluted RT samples as template, forward PCR primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC-3′), reverse PCR primer (5′-TGACGTCGTCTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCGAACC-3′) and SYBR Premix ExTaq (Perfect Real Time) (TAKARA) with attached protocol in Applied Bio-Systems StepOne Real Time PCR System (
To introduce solexa adaptors, PCR reaction was performed again. Optimal number of cycles for the PCR product to be amplified was determined by PCR with 1.0 μM of forward PCR primer (5′-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTAGTCGAACTGAAGG-3′), 1.0 μM of reverse PCR primer (5′-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATCGGTCTCGGCATTCCTGCTGAACCGCT CTTCCGATCT-3′), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 2.5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) and 20 ng of PCR product in a total volume of 50 The program was 5 min 95° C., 10 sec at 55° C., 2 min at 68° C., n×(15 sec at 95° C., 10 sec at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), ∞ at 4° C. For the large-scale amplification, 2×100 μl of PCR were performed with 20 ng of PCR product in each tube (
We tested four deletions and one random permutation (shuffle) of random RT primer to assess the moderately suppressive PCR protocol. Each of them had a corresponding reverse PCR primer.
50 ng of total RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 50 μM of strand-switching oligonucleotide (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG-3′) and 5μM of random RT primer (N-15: 5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN-3′, N-15-notail: 5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN-3′, N-15-del4: 5′-GTACCAGCAGCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCTNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN-3′, N-15-del8: 5′-GTACCAGCAGCTGAAGGTCTCCTCTNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN-3′, N-15-shuffled: 5′-CGTCATACCTCGGCACAATTGCGATATCGGGTANNNNNNNNNNNNNNN-3′) (
From the result, removing the tail of N-15 weakened the moderately suppressive effect (signal appears in the negative control), but did not abolish it. Randomly permuting the sequence of N-15 completely abolished the moderately suppressive effect. So only very short molecules were amplified. Progressively shortening the common region (del4 and 8) had a drastic effect as strong as the randomisation.
We tested a strand-switching oligonucleotide, which is a DNA oligonucleotide, to compare to a DNA/RNA hybrid where the last bases are riboguanosines. 50 ng of total RNA were heat-denatured at 65° C. for 10 min in a final volume of 2 μl with 50 μM of strand-switching oligonucleotide (DNA/RNA hybrid: 5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCArGrGrG-3′, DNA/DNA 5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGCAGGG-3′) and 5 μM of random RT primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTC-3′), in 264 μM D-Threalose (Nacalai Tesque) and 1.32 M D-Sorbitol (WAKO) and then transferred quickly on ice/water mix. RT was accomplished in a volume of 10.5 μl adding the following components to reach these final concentrations: 1.19× first strand buffer (Invitrogen), 595 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 1.24 mM DTT (Invitrogen), 881 mM betaine (WAKO) and 200 units of SuperSCriptII (Invitrogen), and incubated at 22° C. for 10 min, 50° C. for 30 min, 75° C. for 15 min in a MWG thermocycler. The tubes were then immediately transferred on ice/water mix. For the second strand synthesis moderately suppressive PCR reaction was performed. 2 μl of first strand cDNA were amplified in a total volume of 100 μl using a mixture containing 1× ExTaq Buffer (TaKaRa), 200 μM dNTPs (TaKaRa), 100 nM forward PCR primer (5′-TAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCAGC-3′), 100 nM reverse PCR primer (5′-GTACCAGCAGTAGTCGAACTGAAGGTCTCCTCT-3′), and 5 units of ExTaq (TaKaRa) with the following PCR program 5 min at 95° C., n×(15 s at 95° C., 10 s at 65° C., 2 min at 68° C.), 15 min at 68° C. and using hot start. 5 μl aliquots were taken every cycles and analyzed on 1% agarose gel (
Surprisingly, the cDNAs looked almost as good if the strand-switching oligonucleotide was a DNA oligonucleotide when the last bases were guanosines, compared to a DNA/RNA hybrid where the last bases were riboguanosines.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-159527 | Jun 2008 | JP | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2009/061552 | 6/18/2009 | WO | 00 | 3/16/2011 |
